The remaining external incidents of Fleeming’s life, pleasures, honours, fresh interests, new friends, are not such as will bear to be told at any length or in the temporal order. And it is now time to lay narration7 by, and to look at the man he was and the life he lived, more largely.
Edinburgh, which was thenceforth to be his home, is a metropolitan9 small town; where college professors and the lawyers of the Parliament House give the tone, and persons of leisure, attracted by educational advantages, make up much of the bulk of society. Not, therefore, an unlettered place, yet not pedantic11, Edinburgh will compare favourably12 with much larger cities. A hard and disputatious element has been commented on by strangers: it would not touch Fleeming, who was himself regarded, even in this metropolis13 of disputation, as a thorny14 table-mate. To golf unhappily he did not take, and golf is a cardinal15 virtue16 in the city of the winds. Nor did he become an archer17 of the Queen’s Body-Guard, which is the Chiltern Hundreds of the distasted golfer. He did not even frequent the Evening Club, where his colleague Tait (in my day) was so punctual and so genial18. So that in some ways he stood outside of the lighter19 and kindlier life of his new home. I should not like to say that he was generally popular; but there as elsewhere, those who knew him well enough to love him, loved him well. And he, upon his side, liked a place where a dinner party was not of necessity unintellectual, and where men stood up to him in argument.
The presence of his old classmate, Tait, was one of his early attractions to the chair; and now that Fleeming is gone again, Tait still remains20, ruling and really teaching his great classes. Sir Robert Christison was an old friend of his mother’s; Sir Alexander Grant, Kelland, and Sellar, were new acquaintances and highly valued; and these too, all but the last, have been taken from their friends and labours. Death has been busy in the Senatus. I will speak elsewhere of Fleeming’s demeanour to his students; and it will be enough to add here that his relations with his colleagues in general were pleasant to himself.
Edinburgh, then, with its society, its university work, its delightful21 scenery, and its skating in the winter, was thenceforth his base of operations. But he shot meanwhile erratic22 in many directions: twice to America, as we have seen, on telegraph voyages; continually to London on business; often to Paris; year after year to the Highlands to shoot, to fish, to learn reels and Gaelic, to make the acquaintance and fall in love with the character of Highlanders; and once to Styria, to hunt chamois and dance with peasant maidens24. All the while, he was pursuing the course of his electrical studies, making fresh inventions, taking up the phonograph, filled with theories of graphic25 representation; reading, writing, publishing, founding sanitary associations, interested in technical education, investigating the laws of metre, drawing, acting26, directing private theatricals, going a long way to see an actor — a long way to see a picture; in the very bubble of the tideway of contemporary interests. And all the while he was busied about his father and mother, his wife, and in particular his sons; anxiously watching, anxiously guiding these, and plunging27 with his whole fund of youthfulness into their sports and interests. And all the while he was himself maturing — not in character or body, for these remained young — but in the stocked mind, in the tolerant knowledge of life and man, in pious28 acceptance of the universe. Here is a farrago for a chapter: here is a world of interests and activities, human, artistic29, social, scientific, at each of which he sprang with impetuous pleasure, on each of which he squandered30 energy, the arrow drawn31 to the head, the whole intensity32 of his spirit bent33, for the moment, on the momentary34 purpose. It was this that lent such unusual interest to his society, so that no friend of his can forget that figure of Fleeming coming charged with some new discovery: it is this that makes his character so difficult to represent. Our fathers, upon some difficult theme, would invoke35 the Muse36; I can but appeal to the imagination of the reader. When I dwell upon some one thing, he must bear in mind it was only one of a score; that the unweariable brain was teeming37 at the very time with other thoughts; that the good heart had left no kind duty forgotten.
I.
In Edinburgh, for a considerable time, Fleeming’s family, to three generations, was united: Mr. and Mrs. Austin at Hailes, Captain and Mrs. Jenkin in the suburb of Merchiston, Fleeming himself in the city. It is not every family that could risk with safety such close interdomestic dealings; but in this also Fleeming was particularly favoured. Even the two extremes, Mr. Austin and the Captain, drew together. It is pleasant to find that each of the old gentlemen set a high value on the good looks of the other, doubtless also on his own; and a fine picture they made as they walked the green terrace at Hailes, conversing38 by the hour. What they talked of is still a mystery to those who knew them; but Mr. Austin always declared that on these occasions he learned much. To both of these families of elders, due service was paid of attention; to both, Fleeming’s easy circumstances had brought joy; and the eyes of all were on the grandchildren. In Fleeming’s scheme of duties, those of the family stood first; a man was first of all a child, nor did he cease to be so, but only took on added obligations, when he became in turn a father. The care of his parents was always a first thought with him, and their gratification his delight. And the care of his sons, as it was always a grave subject of study with him, and an affair never neglected, so it brought him a thousand satisfactions. ‘Hard work they are,’ as he once wrote, ‘but what fit work!’ And again: ‘O, it’s a cold house where a dog is the only representative of a child!’ Not that dogs were despised; we shall drop across the name of Jack39, the harum-scarum Irish terrier ere we have done; his own dog Plato went up with him daily to his lectures, and still (like other friends) feels the loss and looks visibly for the reappearance of his master; and Martin, the cat, Fleeming has himself immortalised, to the delight of Mr. Swinburne, in the columns of the Spectator. Indeed there was nothing in which men take interest, in which he took not some; and yet always most in the strong human bonds, ancient as the race and woven of delights and duties.
He was even an anxious father; perhaps that is the part where optimism is hardest tested. He was eager for his sons; eager for their health, whether of mind or body; eager for their education; in that, I should have thought, too eager. But he kept a pleasant face upon all things, believed in play, loved it himself, shared boyishly in theirs, and knew how to put a face of entertainment upon business and a spirit of education into entertainment. If he was to test the progress of the three boys, this advertisement would appear in their little manuscript paper:— ‘Notice: The Professor of Engineering in the University of Edinburgh intends at the close of the scholastic40 year to hold examinations in the following subjects: (1) For boys in the fourth class of the Academy — Geometry and Algebra41; (2) For boys at Mr. Henderson’s school — Dictation and Recitation; (3) For boys taught exclusively by their mothers — Arithmetic and Reading.’ Prizes were given; but what prize would be so conciliatory as this boyish little joke? It may read thin here; it would smack42 racily in the playroom. Whenever his sons ‘started a new fad’ (as one of them writes to me) they ‘had only to tell him about it, and he was at once interested and keen to help.’ He would discourage them in nothing unless it was hopelessly too hard for them; only, if there was any principle of science involved, they must understand the principle; and whatever was attempted, that was to be done thoroughly44. If it was but play, if it was but a puppetshow they were to build, he set them the example of being no sluggard45 in play. When Frewen, the second son, embarked46 on the ambitious design to make an engine for a toy steamboat, Fleeming made him begin with a proper drawing — doubtless to the disgust of the young engineer; but once that foundation laid, helped in the work with unflagging gusto, ‘tinkering away,’ for hours, and assisted at the final trial ‘in the big bath’ with no less excitement than the boy. ‘He would take any amount of trouble to help us,’ writes my correspondent. ‘We never felt an affair was complete till we had called him to see, and he would come at any time, in the middle of any work.’ There was indeed one recognised playhour, immediately after the despatch49 of the day’s letters; and the boys were to be seen waiting on the stairs until the mail should be ready and the fun could begin. But at no other time did this busy man suffer his work to interfere50 with that first duty to his children; and there is a pleasant tale of the inventive Master Frewen, engaged at the time upon a toy crane, bringing to the study where his father sat at work a half-wound reel that formed some part of his design, and observing, ‘Papa, you might finiss windin’ this for me; I am so very busy today.’
I put together here a few brief extracts from Fleeming’s letters, none very important in itself, but all together building up a pleasant picture of the father with his sons.
‘Jan. 15th, 1875. — Frewen contemplates51 suspending soap bubbles by silk threads for experimental purposes. I don’t think he will manage that. Bernard’ [the youngest] ‘volunteered to blow the bubbles with enthusiasm.’
‘Jan. 17th. — I am learning a great deal of electrostatics in consequence of the perpetual cross-examination to which I am subjected. I long for you on many grounds, but one is that I may not be obliged to deliver a running lecture on abstract points of science, subject to cross — examination by two acute students. Bernie does not cross-examine much; but if anyone gets discomfited52, he laughs a sort of little silver-whistle giggle53, which is trying to the unhappy blunderer.’
‘May 9th. — Frewen is deep in parachutes. I beg him not to drop from the top landing in one of his own making.’
‘June 6th, 1876. — Frewen’s crank axle is a failure just at present — but he bears up.’
‘June 14th. — The boys enjoy their riding. It gets them whole funds of adventures. One of their caps falling off is matter for delightful reminiscences; and when a horse breaks his step, the occurrence becomes a rear, a shy, or a plunge54 as they talk it over. Austin, with quiet confidence, speaks of the greater pleasure in riding a spirited horse, even if he does give a little trouble. It is the stolid55 brute56 that he dislikes. (N.B. You can still see six inches between him and the saddle when his pony57 trots58.) I listen and sympathise and throw out no hint that their achievements are not really great.’
‘June 18th. — Bernard is much impressed by the fact that I can be useful to Frewen about the steamboat’ [which the latter irrepressible inventor was making]. ‘He says quite with awe59, “He would not have got on nearly so well if you had not helped him.”’
‘June 27th. — I do not see what I could do without Austin. He talks so pleasantly and is so truly good all through.’
‘June 27th. — My chief difficulty with Austin is to get him measured for a pair of trousers. Hitherto I have failed, but I keep a stout60 heart and mean to succeed. Frewen the observer, in describing the paces of two horses, says, “Polly takes twenty-seven steps to get round the school. I couldn’t count Sophy, but she takes more than a hundred.”’
‘Feb. 18th, 1877. — We all feel very lonely without you. Frewen had to come up and sit in my room for company last night and I actually kissed him, a thing that has not occurred for years. Jack, poor fellow, bears it as well as he can, and has taken the opportunity of having a fester on his foot, so he is lame62 and has it bathed, and this occupies his thoughts a good deal.’
‘Feb. 19th. — As to Mill, Austin has not got the list yet. I think it will prejudice him very much against Mill — but that is not my affair. Education of that kind! . . . I would as soon cram63 my boys with food and boast of the pounds they had eaten, as cram them with literature.’
But if Fleeming was an anxious father, he did not suffer his anxiety to prevent the boys from any manly64 or even dangerous pursuit. Whatever it might occur to them to try, he would carefully show them how to do it, explain the risks, and then either share the danger himself or, if that were not possible, stand aside and wait the event with that unhappy courage of the looker-on. He was a good swimmer, and taught them to swim. He thoroughly loved all manly exercises; and during their holidays, and principally in the Highlands, helped and encouraged them to excel in as many as possible: to shoot, to fish, to walk, to pull an oar66, to hand, reef and steer67, and to run a steam launch. In all of these, and in all parts of Highland life, he shared delightedly. He was well onto forty when he took once more to shooting, he was forty-three when he killed his first salmon68, but no boy could have more single-mindedly rejoiced in these pursuits. His growing love for the Highland character, perhaps also a sense of the difficulty of the task, led him to take up at forty-one the study of Gaelic; in which he made some shadow of progress, but not much: the fastnesses of that elusive69 speech retaining to the last their independence. At the house of his friend Mrs. Blackburn, who plays the part of a Highland lady as to the manner born, he learned the delightful custom of kitchen dances, which became the rule at his own house and brought him into yet nearer contact with his neighbours. And thus at forty-two, he began to learn the reel; a study, to which he brought his usual smiling earnestness; and the steps, diagrammatically represented by his own hand, are before me as I write.
It was in 1879 that a new feature was added to the Highland life: a steam launch, called the Purgle, the Styrian corruption72 of Walpurga, after a friend to be hereafter mentioned. ‘The steam launch goes,’ Fleeming wrote. ‘I wish you had been present to describe two scenes of which she has been the occasion already: one during which the population of Ullapool, to a baby, was harnessed to her hurrahing73 — and the other in which the same population sat with its legs over a little pier74, watching Frewen and Bernie getting up steam for the first time.’ The Purgle was got with educational intent; and it served its purpose so well, and the boys knew their business so practically, that when the summer was at an end, Fleeming, Mrs. Jenkin, Frewen the engineer, Bernard the stoker, and Kenneth Robertson a Highland seaman75, set forth8 in her to make the passage south. The first morning they got from Loch Broom into Gruinard bay, where they lunched upon an island; but the wind blowing up in the afternoon, with sheets of rain, it was found impossible to beat to sea; and very much in the situation of castaways upon an unknown coast, the party landed at the mouth of Gruinard river. A shooting lodge76 was spied among the trees; there Fleeming went; and though the master, Mr. Murray, was from home, though the two Jenkin boys were of course as black as colliers, and all the castaways so wetted through that, as they stood in the passage, pools formed about their feet and ran before them into the house, yet Mrs. Murray kindly77 entertained them for the night. On the morrow, however, visitors were to arrive; there would be no room and, in so out-of-the-way a spot, most probably no food for the crew of the Purgle; and on the morrow about noon, with the bay white with spindrift and the wind so strong that one could scarcely stand against it, they got up steam and skulked78 under the land as far as Sanda Bay. Here they crept into a seaside cave, and cooked some food; but the weather now freshening to a gale79, it was plain they must moor80 the launch where she was, and find their way overland to some place of shelter. Even to get their baggage from on board was no light business; for the dingy81 was blown so far to leeward82 every trip, that they must carry her back by hand along the beach. But this once managed, and a cart procured83 in the neighbourhood, they were able to spend the night in a pot-house on Ault Bea. Next day, the sea was unapproachable; but the next they had a pleasant passage to Poolewe, hugging the cliffs, the falling swell84 bursting close by them in the gullies, and the black scarts that sat like ornaments85 on the top of every stack and pinnacle86, looking down into the Purgle as she passed. The climate of Scotland had not done with them yet: for three days they lay storm-stayed in Poolewe, and when they put to sea on the morning of the fourth, the sailors prayed them for God’s sake not to attempt the passage. Their setting out was indeed merely tentative; but presently they had gone too far to return, and found themselves committed to double Rhu Reay with a foul88 wind and a cross sea. From half-past eleven in the morning until half-past five at night, they were in immediate48 and unceasing danger. Upon the least mishap89, the Purgle must either have been swamped by the seas or bulged90 upon the cliffs of that rude headland. Fleeming and Robertson took turns baling and steering91; Mrs. Jenkin, so violent was the commotion92 of the boat, held on with both hands; Frewen, by Robertson’s direction, ran the engine, slacking and pressing her to meet the seas; and Bernard, only twelve years old, deadly sea-sick, and continually thrown against the boiler93, so that he was found next day to be covered with burns, yet kept an even fire. It was a very thankful party that sat down that evening to meat in the Hotel at Gairloch. And perhaps, although the thing was new in the family, no one was much surprised when Fleeming said grace over that meal. Thenceforward he continued to observe the form, so that there was kept alive in his house a grateful memory of peril94 and deliverance. But there was nothing of the muff in Fleeming; he thought it a good thing to escape death, but a becoming and a healthful thing to run the risk of it; and what is rarer, that which he thought for himself, he thought for his family also. In spite of the terrors of Rhu Reay, the cruise was persevered95 in and brought to an end under happier conditions.
One year, instead of the Highlands, Alt Aussee, in the Steiermark, was chosen for the holidays; and the place, the people, and the life delighted Fleeming. He worked hard at German, which he had much forgotten since he was a boy; and what is highly characteristic, equally hard at the patois96, in which he learned to excel. He won a prize at a Schutzen-fest; and though he hunted chamois without much success, brought down more interesting game in the shape of the Styrian peasants, and in particular of his gillie, Joseph. This Joseph was much of a character; and his appreciations97 of Fleeming have a fine note of their own. The bringing up of the boys he deigned98 to approve of: ‘Fast So Gut99 Wie Ein Bauer,’ was his trenchant100 criticism. The attention and courtly respect with which Fleeming surrounded his wife, was something of a puzzle to the philosophic101 gillie; he announced in the village that Mrs. Jenkin — Die Silberne Frau, as the folk had prettily102 named her from some silver ornaments — was a ‘Geborene Grafin’ who had married beneath her; and when Fleeming explained what he called the English theory (though indeed it was quite his own) of married relations, Joseph, admiring but unconvinced, avowed103 it was ‘Gar Schon.’ Joseph’s cousin, Walpurga Moser, to an orchestra of clarionet and zither, taught the family the country dances, the Steierisch and the Landler, and gained their hearts during the lessons. Her sister Loys, too, who was up at the Alp with the cattle, came down to church on Sundays, made acquaintance with the Jenkins, and must have them up to see the sunrise from her house upon the Loser, where they had supper and all slept in the loft104 among the hay. The Mosers were not lost sight of; Walpurga still corresponds with Mrs. Jenkin, and it was a late pleasure of Fleeming’s to choose and despatch a wedding present for his little mountain friend. This visit was brought to an end by a ball in the big inn parlour; the refreshments105 chosen, the list of guests drawn up, by Joseph; the best music of the place in attendance; and hosts and guests in their best clothes. The ball was opened by Mrs. Jenkin dancing Steierisch with a lordly Bauer, in gray and silver and with a plumed106 hat; and Fleeming followed with Walpurga Moser.
There ran a principle through all these holiday pleasures. In Styria as in the Highlands, the same course was followed: Fleeming threw himself as fully65 as he could into the life and occupations of the native people, studying everywhere their dances and their language, and conforming, always with pleasure, to their rustic etiquette107. Just as the ball at Alt Aussee was designed for the taste of Joseph, the parting feast at Attadale was ordered in every particular to the taste of Murdoch the Keeper. Fleeming was not one of the common, so-called gentlemen, who take the tricks of their own coterie108 to be eternal principles of taste. He was aware, on the other hand, that rustic people dwelling109 in their own places, follow ancient rules with fastidious precision, and are easily shocked and embarrassed by what (if they used the word) they would have to call the vulgarity of visitors from town. And he, who was so cavalier with men of his own class, was sedulous110 to shield the more tender feelings of the peasant; he, who could be so trying in a drawing-room, was even punctilious111 in the cottage. It was in all respects a happy virtue. It renewed his life, during these holidays, in all particulars. It often entertained him with the discovery of strange survivals; as when, by the orders of Murdoch, Mrs. Jenkin must publicly taste of every dish before it was set before her guests. And thus to throw himself into a fresh life and a new school of manners was a grateful exercise of Fleeming’s mimetic instinct; and to the pleasures of the open air, of hardships supported, of dexterities improved and displayed, and of plain and elegant society, added a spice of drama.
II.
Fleeming was all his life a lover of the play and all that belonged to it. Dramatic literature he knew fully. He was one of the not very numerous people who can read a play: a knack112, the fruit of much knowledge and some imagination, comparable to that of reading score. Few men better understood the artificial principles on which a play is good or bad; few more unaffectedly enjoyed a piece of any merit of construction. His own play was conceived with a double design; for he had long been filled with his theory of the true story of Griselda; used to gird at Father Chaucer for his misconception; and was, perhaps first of all, moved by the desire to do justice to the Marquis of Saluces, and perhaps only in the second place, by the wish to treat a story (as he phrased it) like a sum in arithmetic. I do not think he quite succeeded; but I must own myself no fit judge. Fleeming and I were teacher and taught as to the principles, disputatious rivals in the practice, of dramatic writing.
Acting had always, ever since Rachel and the Marseillaise, a particular power on him. ‘If I do not cry at the play,’ he used to say, ‘I want to have my money back.’ Even from a poor play with poor actors, he could draw pleasure. ‘Giacometti’s Elisabetta,’ I find him writing, ‘fetched the house vastly. Poor Queen Elizabeth! And yet it was a little good.’ And again, after a night of Salvini: ‘I do not suppose any one with feelings could sit out Othello, if Iago and Desdemona were acted.’ Salvini was, in his view, the greatest actor he had seen. We were all indeed moved and bettered by the visit of that wonderful man. — ‘I declare I feel as if I could pray!’ cried one of us, on the return from Hamlet. — ‘That is prayer,’ said Fleeming. W. B. Hole and I, in a fine enthusiasm of gratitude113, determined114 to draw up an address to Salvini, did so, and carried it to Fleeming; and I shall never forget with what coldness he heard and deleted the eloquence115 of our draft, nor with what spirit (our vanities once properly mortified) he threw himself into the business of collecting signatures. It was his part, on the ground of his Italian, to see and arrange with the actor; it was mine to write in the Academy a notice of the first performance of Macbeth. Fleeming opened the paper, read so far, and flung it on the floor. ‘No,’ he cried, ‘that won’t do. You were thinking of yourself, not of Salvini!’ The criticism was shrewd as usual, but it was unfair through ignorance; it was not of myself that I was thinking, but of the difficulties of my trade which I had not well mastered. Another unalloyed dramatic pleasure which Fleeming and I shared the year of the Paris Exposition, was the Marquis De Villemer, that blameless play, performed by Madeleine Brohan, Delaunay, Worms, and Broisat — an actress, in such parts at least, to whom I have never seen full justice rendered. He had his fill of weeping on that occasion; and when the piece was at an end, in front of a cafe, in the mild, midnight air, we had our fill of talk about the art of acting.
But what gave the stage so strong a hold on Fleeming was an inheritance from Norwich, from Edward Barron, and from Enfield of the Speaker. The theatre was one of Edward Barron’s elegant hobbies; he read plays, as became Enfield’s son-inlaw, with a good discretion116; he wrote plays for his family, in which Eliza Barron used to shine in the chief parts; and later in life, after the Norwich home was broken up, his little granddaughter would sit behind him in a great armchair, and be introduced, with his stately elocution, to the world of dramatic literature. From this, in a direct line, we can deduce the charades117 at Claygate; and after money came, in the Edinburgh days, that private theatre which took up so much of Fleeming’s energy and thought. The company — Mr. and Mrs. R. O. Carter of Colwall, W. B. Hole, Captain Charles Douglas, Mr. Kunz, Mr. Burnett, Professor Lewis Campbell, Mr. Charles Baxter, and many more — made a charming society for themselves and gave pleasure to their audience. Mr. Carter in Sir Toby Belch118 it would be hard to beat. Mr. Hole in broad farce119, or as the herald120 in the Trachiniae, showed true stage talent. As for Mrs. Jenkin, it was for her the rest of us existed and were forgiven; her powers were an endless spring of pride and pleasure to her husband; he spent hours hearing and schooling121 her in private; and when it came to the performance, though there was perhaps no one in the audience more critical, none was more moved than Fleeming. The rest of us did not aspire122 so high. There were always five performances and weeks of busy rehearsal123; and whether we came to sit and stifle124 as the prompter, to be the dumb (or rather the inarticulate) recipients125 of Carter’s dog whip in the Taming of the Shrew, or having earned our spurs, to lose one more illusion in a leading part, we were always sure at least of a long and an exciting holiday in mirthful company.
In this laborious126 annual diversion, Fleeming’s part was large. I never thought him an actor, but he was something of a mimic127, which stood him in stead. Thus he had seen Got in Poirier; and his own Poirier, when he came to play it, breathed meritoriously129 of the model. The last part I saw him play was Triplet, and at first I thought it promised well. But alas130! the boys went for a holiday, missed a train, and were not heard of at home till late at night. Poor Fleeming, the man who never hesitated to give his sons a chisel131 or a gun, or to send them abroad in a canoe or on a horse, toiled132 all day at his rehearsal, growing hourly paler, Triplet growing hourly less meritorious128. And though the return of the children, none the worse for their little adventure, brought the colour back into his face, it could not restore him to his part. I remember finding him seated on the stairs in some rare moment of quiet during the subsequent performances. ‘Hullo, Jenkin,’ said I, ‘you look down in the mouth.’ — ‘My dear boy,’ said he, ‘haven’t you heard me? I have not one decent intonation133 from beginning to end.’
But indeed he never supposed himself an actor; took a part, when he took any, merely for convenience, as one takes a hand at whist; and found his true service and pleasure in the more congenial business of the manager. Augier, Racine, Shakespeare, Aristophanes in Hookham Frere’s translation, Sophocles and AEschylus in Lewis Campbell’s, such were some of the authors whom he introduced to his public. In putting these upon the stage, he found a thousand exercises for his ingenuity134 and taste, a thousand problems arising which he delighted to study, a thousand opportunities to make these infinitesimal improvements which are so much in art and for the artist. Our first Greek play had been costumed by the professional costumer, with unforgetable results of comicality and indecorum: the second, the Trachiniae, of Sophocles, he took in hand himself, and a delightful task he made of it. His study was then in antiquarian books, where he found confusion, and on statues and bas-reliefs, where he at last found clearness; after an hour or so at the British Museum, he was able to master ‘the chiton, sleeves and all’; and before the time was ripe, he had a theory of Greek tailoring at his fingers’ ends, and had all the costumes made under his eye as a Greek tailor would have made them. ‘The Greeks made the best plays and the best statues, and were the best architects: of course, they were the best tailors, too,’ said he; and was never weary, when he could find a tolerant listener, of dwelling on the simplicity135, the economy, the elegance136 both of means and effect, which made their system so delightful.
But there is another side to the stage-manager’s employment. The discipline of acting is detestable; the failures and triumphs of that business appeal too directly to the vanity; and even in the course of a careful amateur performance such as ours, much of the smaller side of man will be displayed. Fleeming, among conflicting vanities and levities137, played his part to my admiration138. He had his own view; he might be wrong; but the performances (he would remind us) were after all his, and he must decide. He was, in this as in all other things, an iron taskmaster, sparing not himself nor others. If you were going to do it at all, he would see that it was done as well as you were able. I have known him to keep two culprits (and one of these his wife) repeating the same action and the same two or three words for a whole weary afternoon. And yet he gained and retained warm feelings from far the most of those who fell under his domination, and particularly (it is pleasant to remember) from the girls. After the slipshod training and the incomplete accomplishments140 of a girls’ school, there was something at first annoying, at last exciting and bracing141, in this high standard of accomplishment139 and perseverance142.
III.
It did not matter why he entered upon any study or employment, whether for amusement like the Greek tailoring or the Highland reels, whether from a desire to serve the public as with his sanitary work, or in the view of benefiting poorer men as with his labours for technical education, he ‘pitched into it’ (as he would have said himself) with the same headlong zest143. I give in the Appendix a letter from Colonel Fergusson, which tells fully the nature of the sanitary work and of Fleeming’s part and success in it. It will be enough to say here that it was a scheme of protection against the blundering of builders and the dishonesty of plumbers144. Started with an eye rather to the houses of the rich, Fleeming hoped his Sanitary Associations would soon extend their sphere of usefulness and improve the dwellings145 of the poor. In this hope he was disappointed; but in all other ways the scheme exceedingly prospered146, associations sprang up and continue to spring up in many quarters, and wherever tried they have been found of use.
Here, then, was a serious employment; it has proved highly useful to mankind; and it was begun besides, in a mood of bitterness, under the shock of what Fleeming would so sensitively feel — the death of a whole family of children. Yet it was gone upon like a holiday jaunt147. I read in Colonel Fergusson’s letter that his schoolmates bantered149 him when he began to broach150 his scheme; so did I at first, and he took the banter148 as he always did with enjoyment151, until he suddenly posed me with the question: ‘And now do you see any other jokes to make? Well, then,’ said he, ‘that’s all right. I wanted you to have your fun out first; now we can be serious.’ And then with a glowing heat of pleasure, he laid his plans before me, revelling152 in the details, revelling in hope. It was as he wrote about the joy of electrical experiment. ‘What shall I compare them to? A new song? — a Greek play?’ Delight attended the exercise of all his powers; delight painted the future. Of these ideal visions, some (as I have said) failed of their fruition. And the illusion was characteristic. Fleeming believed we had only to make a virtue cheap and easy, and then all would practise it; that for an end unquestionably good, men would not grudge153 a little trouble and a little money, though they might stumble at laborious pains and generous sacrifices. He could not believe in any resolute154 badness. ‘I cannot quite say,’ he wrote in his young manhood, ‘that I think there is no sin or misery155. This I can say: I do not remember one single malicious156 act done to myself. In fact it is rather awkward when I have to say the Lord’s Prayer. I have nobody’s trespasses157 to forgive.’ And to the point, I remember one of our discussions. I said it was a dangerous error not to admit there were bad people; he, that it was only a confession158 of blindness on our part, and that we probably called others bad only so far as we were wrapped in ourselves and lacking in the transmigratory forces of imagination. I undertook to describe to him three persons irredeemably bad and whom he should admit to be so. In the first case, he denied my evidence: ‘You cannot judge a man upon such testimony,’ said he. For the second, he owned it made him sick to hear the tale; but then there was no spark of malice159, it was mere87 weakness I had described, and he had never denied nor thought to set a limit to man’s weakness. At my third gentleman, he struck his colours. ‘Yes,’ said he, ‘I’m afraid that is a bad man.’ And then looking at me shrewdly: ‘I wonder if it isn’t a very unfortunate thing for you to have met him.’ I showed him radiantly how it was the world we must know, the world as it was, not a world expurgated and prettified with optimistic rainbows. ‘Yes, yes,’ said he; ‘but this badness is such an easy, lazy explanation. Won’t you be tempted43 to use it, instead of trying to understand people?’
In the year 1878, he took a passionate160 fancy for the phonograph: it was a toy after his heart, a toy that touched the skirts of life, art, and science, a toy prolific161 of problems and theories. Something fell to be done for a University Cricket Ground Bazaar162. ‘And the thought struck him,’ Mr. Ewing writes to me, ‘to exhibit Edison’s phonograph, then the very newest scientific marvel163. The instrument itself was not to be purchased — I think no specimen164 had then crossed the Atlantic — but a copy of the Times with an account of it was at hand, and by the help of this we made a phonograph which to our great joy talked, and talked, too, with the purest American accent. It was so good that a second instrument was got ready forthwith. Both were shown at the Bazaar: one by Mrs. Jenkin to people willing to pay half a crown for a private view and the privilege of hearing their own voices, while Jenkin, perfervid as usual, gave half-hourly lectures on the other in an adjoining room — I, as his lieutenant165, taking turns. The thing was in its way a little triumph. A few of the visitors were deaf, and hugged the belief that they were the victims of a new kind of fancy-fair swindle. Of the others, many who came to scoff166 remained to take raffle167 tickets; and one of the phonographs was finally disposed of in this way, falling, by a happy freak of the ballot-box, into the hands of Sir William Thomson.’ The other remained in Fleeming’s hands, and was a source of infinite occupation. Once it was sent to London, ‘to bring back on the tinfoil168 the tones of a lady distinguished169 for clear vocalisations; at another time Sir Robert Christison was brought in to contribute his powerful bass’; and there scarcely came a visitor about the house, but he was made the subject of experiment. The visitors, I am afraid, took their parts lightly: Mr. Hole and I, with unscientific laughter, commemorating170 various shades of Scotch171 accent, or proposing to ‘teach the poor dumb animal to swear.’ But Fleeming and Mr. Ewing, when we butterflies were gone, were laboriously172 ardent173. Many thoughts that occupied the later years of my friend were caught from the small utterance174 of that toy. Thence came his inquiries175 into the roots of articulate language and the foundations of literary art; his papers on vowel176 sounds, his papers in the Saturday Review upon the laws of verse, and many a strange approximation, many a just note, thrown out in talk and now forgotten. I pass over dozens of his interests, and dwell on this trifling177 matter of the phonograph, because it seems to me that it depicts178 the man. So, for Fleeming, one thing joined into another, the greater with the less. He cared not where it was he scratched the surface of the ultimate mystery — in the child’s toy, in the great tragedy, in the laws of the tempest, or in the properties of energy or mass — certain that whatever he touched, it was a part of life — and however he touched it, there would flow for his happy constitution interest and delight. ‘All fables179 have their morals,’ says Thoreau, ‘but the innocent enjoy the story.’ There is a truth represented for the imagination in these lines of a noble poem, where we are told, that in our highest hours of visionary clearness, we can but
‘see the children sport upon the shore
And hear the mighty180 waters rolling evermore.’
To this clearness Fleeming had attained181; and although he heard the voice of the eternal seas and weighed its message, he was yet able, until the end of his life, to sport upon these shores of death and mystery with the gaiety and innocence182 of children.
IV.
It was as a student that I first knew Fleeming, as one of that modest number of young men who sat under his ministrations in a soul-chilling class-room at the top of the University buildings. His presence was against him as a professor: no one, least of all students, would have been moved to respect him at first sight: rather short in stature183, markedly plain, boyishly young in manner, cocking his head like a terrier with every mark of the most engaging vivacity184 and readiness to be pleased, full of words, full of paradox185, a stranger could scarcely fail to look at him twice, a man thrown with him in a train could scarcely fail to be engaged by him in talk, but a student would never regard him as academical. Yet he had that fibre in him that order always existed in his class-room. I do not remember that he ever addressed me in language; at the least sign of unrest, his eye would fall on me and I was quelled186. Such a feat71 is comparatively easy in a small class; but I have misbehaved in smaller classes and under eyes more Olympian than Fleeming Jenkin’s. He was simply a man from whose reproof187 one shrank; in manner the least buckrammed of mankind, he had, in serious moments, an extreme dignity of goodness. So it was that he obtained a power over the most insubordinate of students, but a power of which I was myself unconscious. I was inclined to regard any professor as a joke, and Fleeming as a particularly good joke, perhaps the broadest in the vast pleasantry of my curriculum. I was not able to follow his lectures; I somehow dared not misconduct myself, as was my customary solace188; and I refrained from attending. This brought me at the end of the session into a relation with my contemned189 professor that completely opened my eyes. During the year, bad student as I was, he had shown a certain leaning to my society; I had been to his house, he had asked me to take a humble190 part in his theatricals; I was a master in the art of extracting a certificate even at the cannon’s mouth; and I was under no apprehension191. But when I approached Fleeming, I found myself in another world; he would have naught192 of me. ‘It is quite useless for you to come to me, Mr. Stevenson. There may be doubtful cases, there is no doubt about yours. You have simply not attended my class.’ The document was necessary to me for family considerations; and presently I stooped to such pleadings and rose to such adjurations, as made my ears burn to remember. He was quite unmoved; he had no pity for me. — ‘You are no fool,’ said he, ‘and you chose your course.’ I showed him that he had misconceived his duty, that certificates were things of form, attendance a matter of taste. Two things, he replied, had been required for graduation, a certain competency proved in the final trials and a certain period of genuine training proved by certificate; if he did as I desired, not less than if he gave me hints for an examination, he was aiding me to steal a degree. ‘You see, Mr. Stevenson, these are the laws and I am here to apply them,’ said he. I could not say but that this view was tenable, though it was new to me; I changed my attack: it was only for my father’s eye that I required his signature, it need never go to the Senatus, I had already certificates enough to justify193 my year’s attendance. ‘Bring them to me; I cannot take your word for that,’ said he. ‘Then I will consider.’ The next day I came charged with my certificates, a humble assortment194. And when he had satisfied himself, ‘Remember,’ said he, ‘that I can promise nothing, but I will try to find a form of words.’ He did find one, and I am still ashamed when I think of his shame in giving me that paper. He made no reproach in speech, but his manner was the more eloquent195; it told me plainly what a dirty business we were on; and I went from his presence, with my certificate indeed in my possession, but with no answerable sense of triumph. That was the bitter beginning of my love for Fleeming; I never thought lightly of him afterwards.
Once, and once only, after our friendship was truly founded, did we come to a considerable difference. It was, by the rules of poor humanity, my fault and his. I had been led to dabble196 in society journalism197; and this coming to his ears, he felt it like a disgrace upon himself. So far he was exactly in the right; but he was scarce happily inspired when he broached198 the subject at his own table and before guests who were strangers to me. It was the sort of error he was always ready to repent199, but always certain to repeat; and on this occasion he spoke200 so freely that I soon made an excuse and left the house with the firm purpose of returning no more. About a month later, I met him at dinner at a common friend’s. ‘Now,’ said he, on the stairs, ‘I engage you — like a lady to dance — for the end of the evening. You have no right to quarrel with me and not give me a chance.’ I have often said and thought that Fleeming had no tact70; he belied201 the opinion then. I remember perfectly202 how, so soon as we could get together, he began his attack: ‘You may have grounds of quarrel with me; you have none against Mrs. Jenkin; and before I say another word, I want you to promise you will come to her house as usual.’ An interview thus begun could have but one ending: if the quarrel were the fault of both, the merit of the reconciliation203 was entirely204 Fleeming’s.
When our intimacy205 first began, coldly enough, accidentally enough on his part, he had still something of the Puritan, something of the inhuman206 narrowness of the good youth. It fell from him slowly, year by year, as he continued to ripen207, and grow milder, and understand more generously the mingled208 characters of men. In the early days he once read me a bitter lecture; and I remember leaving his house in a fine spring afternoon, with the physical darkness of despair upon my eyesight. Long after he made me a formal retractation of the sermon and a formal apology for the pain he had inflicted209; adding drolly210, but truly, ‘You see, at that time I was so much younger than you!’ And yet even in those days there was much to learn from him; and above all his fine spirit of piety211, bravely and trustfully accepting life, and his singular delight in the heroic.
His piety was, indeed, a thing of chief importance. His views (as they are called) upon religious matters varied212 much; and he could never be induced to think them more or less than views. ‘All dogma is to me mere form,’ he wrote; ‘dogmas are mere blind struggles to express the inexpressible. I cannot conceive that any single proposition whatever in religion is true in the scientific sense; and yet all the while I think the religious view of the world is the most true view. Try to separate from the mass of their statements that which is common to Socrates, Isaiah, David, St. Bernard, the Jansenists, Luther, Mahomet, Bunyan — yes, and George Eliot: of course you do not believe that this something could be written down in a set of propositions like Euclid, neither will you deny that there is something common and this something very valuable. . . . I shall be sorry if the boys ever give a moment’s thought to the question of what community they belong to — I hope they will belong to the great community.’ I should observe that as time went on his conformity213 to the church in which he was born grew more complete, and his views drew nearer the conventional. ‘The longer I live, my dear Louis,’ he wrote but a few months before his death, ‘the more convinced I become of a direct care by God — which is reasonably impossible — but there it is.’ And in his last year he took the communion.
But at the time when I fell under his influence, he stood more aloof214; and this made him the more impressive to a youthful atheist215. He had a keen sense of language and its imperial influence on men; language contained all the great and sound metaphysics, he was wont216 to say; and a word once made and generally understood, he thought a real victory of man and reason. But he never dreamed it could be accurate, knowing that words stand symbol for the indefinable. I came to him once with a problem which had puzzled me out of measure: what is a cause? why out of so many innumerable millions of conditions, all necessary, should one be singled out and ticketed ‘the cause’? ‘You do not understand,’ said he. ‘A cause is the answer to a question: it designates that condition which I happen to know and you happen not to know.’ It was thus, with partial exception of the mathematical, that he thought of all means of reasoning: they were in his eyes but means of communication, so to be understood, so to be judged, and only so far to be credited. The mathematical he made, I say, exception of: number and measure he believed in to the extent of their significance, but that significance, he was never weary of reminding you, was slender to the verge217 of nonentity218. Science was true, because it told us almost nothing. With a few abstractions it could deal, and deal correctly; conveying honestly faint truths. Apply its means to any concrete fact of life, and this high dialect of the wise became a childish jargon219.
Thus the atheistic220 youth was met at every turn by a scepticism more complete than his own, so that the very weapons of the fight were changed in his grasp to swords of paper. Certainly the church is not right, he would argue, but certainly not the anti-church either. Men are not such fools as to be wholly in the wrong, nor yet are they so placed as to be ever wholly in the right. Somewhere, in mid47 air between the disputants, like hovering221 Victory in some design of a Greek battle, the truth hangs undiscerned. And in the meanwhile what matter these uncertainties222? Right is very obvious; a great consent of the best of mankind, a loud voice within us (whether of God, or whether by inheritance, and in that case still from God), guide and command us in the path of duty. He saw life very simple; he did not love refinements223; he was a friend to much conformity in unessentials. For (he would argue) it is in this life as it stands about us, that we are given our problem; the manners of the day are the colours of our palette; they condition, they constrain224 us; and a man must be very sure he is in the right, must (in a favourite phrase of his) be ‘either very wise or very vain,’ to break with any general consent in ethics225. I remember taking his advice upon some point of conduct. ‘Now,’ he said, ‘how do you suppose Christ would have advised you?’ and when I had answered that he would not have counselled me anything unkind or cowardly, ‘No,’ he said, with one of his shrewd strokes at the weakness of his hearer, ‘nor anything amusing.’ Later in life, he made less certain in the field of ethics. ‘The old story of the knowledge of good and evil is a very true one,’ I find him writing; only (he goes on) ‘the effect of the original dose is much worn out, leaving Adam’s descendants with the knowledge that there is such a thing — but uncertain where.’ His growing sense of this ambiguity226 made him less swift to condemn227, but no less stimulating228 in counsel. ‘You grant yourself certain freedoms. Very well,’ he would say, ‘I want to see you pay for them some other way. You positively229 cannot do this: then there positively must be something else that you can do, and I want to see you find that out and do it.’ Fleeming would never suffer you to think that you were living, if there were not, somewhere in your life, some touch of heroism, to do or to endure.
This was his rarest quality. Far on in middle age, when men begin to lie down with the bestial230 goddesses, Comfort and Respectability, the strings231 of his nature still sounded as high a note as a young man’s. He loved the harsh voice of duty like a call to battle. He loved courage, enterprise, brave natures, a brave word, an ugly virtue; everything that lifts us above the table where we eat or the bed we sleep upon. This with no touch of the motive-monger or the ascetic232. He loved his virtues233 to be practical, his heroes to be great eaters of beef; he loved the jovial234 Heracles, loved the astute235 Odysseus; not the Robespierres and Wesleys. A fine buoyant sense of life and of man’s unequal character ran through all his thoughts. He could not tolerate the spirit of the pick-thank; being what we are, he wished us to see others with a generous eye of admiration, not with the smallness of the seeker after faults. If there shone anywhere a virtue, no matter how incongruously set, it was upon the virtue we must fix our eyes. I remember having found much entertainment in Voltaire’s Saul, and telling him what seemed to me the drollest touches. He heard me out, as usual when displeased236, and then opened fire on me with red-hot shot. To belittle237 a noble story was easy; it was not literature, it was not art, it was not morality; there was no sustenance238 in such a form of jesting, there was (in his favourite phrase) ‘no nitrogenous food’ in such literature. And then he proceeded to show what a fine fellow David was; and what a hard knot he was in about Bathsheba, so that (the initial wrong committed) honour might well hesitate in the choice of conduct; and what owls239 those people were who marvelled240 because an Eastern tyrant241 had killed Uriah, instead of marvelling242 that he had not killed the prophet also. ‘Now if Voltaire had helped me to feel that,’ said he, ‘I could have seen some fun in it.’ He loved the comedy which shows a hero human, and yet leaves him a hero, and the laughter which does not lessen243 love.
It was this taste for what is fine in human-kind, that ruled his choice in books. These should all strike a high note, whether brave or tender, and smack of the open air. The noble and simple presentation of things noble and simple, that was the ‘nitrogenous food’ of which he spoke so much, which he sought so eagerly, enjoyed so royally. He wrote to an author, the first part of whose story he had seen with sympathy, hoping that it might continue in the same vein244. ‘That this may be so,’ he wrote, ‘I long with the longing245 of David for the water of Bethlehem. But no man need die for the water a poet can give, and all can drink it to the end of time, and their thirst be quenched246 and the pool never dry — and the thirst and the water are both blessed.’ It was in the Greeks particularly that he found this blessed water; he loved ‘a fresh air’ which he found ‘about the Greek things even in translations’; he loved their freedom from the mawkish247 and the rancid. The tale of David in the Bible, the Odyssey248, Sophocles, AEschylus, Shakespeare, Scott; old Dumas in his chivalrous249 note; Dickens rather than Thackeray, and the Tale of Two Cities out of Dickens: such were some of his preferences. To Ariosto and Boccaccio he was always faithful; Burnt Njal was a late favourite; and he found at least a passing entertainment in the Arcadia and the Grand Cyrus. George Eliot he outgrew250, finding her latterly only sawdust in the mouth; but her influence, while it lasted, was great, and must have gone some way to form his mind. He was easily set on edge, however, by didactic writing; and held that books should teach no other lesson but what ‘real life would teach, were it as vividly251 presented.’ Again, it was the thing made that took him, the drama in the book; to the book itself, to any merit of the making, he was long strangely blind. He would prefer the Agamemnon in the prose of Mr. Buckley, ay, to Keats. But he was his mother’s son, learning to the last. He told me one day that literature was not a trade; that it was no craft; that the professed252 author was merely an amateur with a door-plate. ‘Very well,’ said I, ‘the first time you get a proof, I will demonstrate that it is as much a trade as bricklaying, and that you do not know it.’ By the very next post, a proof came. I opened it with fear; for he was indeed, as the reader will see by these volumes, a formidable amateur; always wrote brightly, because he always thought trenchantly253; and sometimes wrote brilliantly, as the worst of whistlers may sometimes stumble on a perfect intonation. But it was all for the best in the interests of his education; and I was able, over that proof, to give him a quarter of an hour such as Fleeming loved both to give and to receive. His subsequent training passed out of my hands into those of our common friend, W. E. Henley. ‘Henley and I,’ he wrote, ‘have fairly good times wigging254 one another for not doing better. I wig255 him because he won’t try to write a real play, and he wigs256 me because I can’t try to write English.’ When I next saw him, he was full of his new acquisitions. ‘And yet I have lost something too,’ he said regretfully. ‘Up to now Scott seemed to me quite perfect, he was all I wanted. Since I have been learning this confounded thing, I took up one of the novels, and a great deal of it is both careless and clumsy.’
V.
He spoke four languages with freedom, not even English with any marked propriety257. What he uttered was not so much well said, as excellently acted: so we may hear every day the inexpressive language of a poorly-written drama assume character and colour in the hands of a good player. No man had more of the Vis Comica in private life; he played no character on the stage, as he could play himself among his friends. It was one of his special charms; now when the voice is silent and the face still, it makes it impossible to do justice to his power in conversation. He was a delightful companion to such as can bear bracing weather; not to the very vain; not to the owlishly wise, who cannot have their dogmas canvassed258; not to the painfully refined, whose sentiments become articles of faith. The spirit in which he could write that he was ‘much revived by having an opportunity of abusing Whistler to a knot of his special admirers,’ is a spirit apt to be misconstrued. He was not a dogmatist, even about Whistler. ‘The house is full of pretty things,’ he wrote, when on a visit; ‘but Mrs. —‘s taste in pretty things has one very bad fault: it is not my taste.’ And that was the true attitude of his mind; but these eternal differences it was his joy to thresh out and wrangle259 over by the hour. It was no wonder if he loved the Greeks; he was in many ways a Greek himself; he should have been a sophist and met Socrates; he would have loved Socrates, and done battle with him staunchly and manfully owned his defeat; and the dialogue, arranged by Plato, would have shown even in Plato’s gallery. He seemed in talk aggressive, petulant260, full of a singular energy; as vain you would have said as a peacock, until you trod on his toes, and then you saw that he was at least clear of all the sicklier elements of vanity. Soundly rang his laugh at any jest against himself. He wished to be taken, as he took others, for what was good in him without dissimulation261 of the evil, for what was wise in him without concealment262 of the childish. He hated a draped virtue, and despised a wit on its own defence. And he drew (if I may so express myself) a human and humorous portrait of himself with all his defects and qualities, as he thus enjoyed in talk the robust263 sports of the intelligence; giving and taking manfully, always without pretence264, always with paradox, always with exuberant265 pleasure; speaking wisely of what he knew, foolishly of what he knew not; a teacher, a learner, but still combative266; picking holes in what was said even to the length of captiousness267, yet aware of all that was said rightly; jubilant in victory, delighted by defeat: a Greek sophist, a British schoolboy.
Among the legends of what was once a very pleasant spot, the old Savile Club, not then divorced from Savile Row, there are many memories of Fleeming. He was not popular at first, being known simply as ‘the man who dines here and goes up to Scotland’; but he grew at last, I think, the most generally liked of all the members. To those who truly knew and loved him, who had tasted the real sweetness of his nature, Fleeming’s porcupine268 ways had always been a matter of keen regret. They introduced him to their own friends with fear; sometimes recalled the step with mortification269. It was not possible to look on with patience while a man so lovable thwarted270 love at every step. But the course of time and the ripening271 of his nature brought a cure. It was at the Savile that he first remarked a change; it soon spread beyond the walls of the club. Presently I find him writing: ‘Will you kindly explain what has happened to me? All my life I have talked a good deal, with the almost unfailing result of making people sick of the sound of my tongue. It appeared to me that I had various things to say, and I had no malevolent272 feelings, but nevertheless the result was that expressed above. Well, lately some change has happened. If I talk to a person one day, they must have me the next. Faces light up when they see me. — “Ah, I say, come here,” — “come and dine with me.” It’s the most preposterous273 thing I ever experienced. It is curiously274 pleasant. You have enjoyed it all your life, and therefore cannot conceive how bewildering a burst of it is for the first time at forty-nine.’ And this late sunshine of popularity still further softened275 him. He was a bit of a porcupine to the last, still shedding darts276; or rather he was to the end a bit of a schoolboy, and must still throw stones, but the essential toleration that underlay277 his disputatiousness, and the kindness that made of him a tender sicknurse and a generous helper, shone more conspicuously278 through. A new pleasure had come to him; and as with all sound natures, he was bettered by the pleasure.
I can best show Fleeming in this later stage by quoting from a vivid and interesting letter of M. Emile Trelat’s. Here, admirably expressed, is how he appeared to a friend of another nation, whom he encountered only late in life. M. Trelat will pardon me if I correct, even before I quote him; but what the Frenchman supposed to flow from some particular bitterness against France, was only Fleeming’s usual address. Had M. Trelat been Italian, Italy would have fared as ill; and yet Italy was Fleeming’s favourite country.
Vous savez comment j’ai connu Fleeming Jenkin! C’etait en Mai 1878. Nous etions tous deux membres du jury de l’Exposition Universelle. On n’avait rien fait qui vaille a la premiere seance de notre classe, qui avait eu lieu le matin. Tout61 le monde avait parle et reparle pour ne rien dire23. Cela durait depuis huit heures; il etait midi. Je demandai la parole pour une motion d’ordre, et je proposai que la seance fut levee a la condition que chaque membre francais, Emportat a dejeuner un jure etranger. Jenkin applaudit. ‘Je vous emimene dejeuner,’ lui criai-je. ‘Je veux bien.’ . . . Nous partimes; en chemin nous vous rencontrions; il vous presente et nous allons dejeuner tous trois aupres du Trocadero.
Et, depuis ce temps, nous avons ete de vieux amis. Non seulement nous passions nos journees au jury, ou nous etions toujours ensemble279, cote-a-cote. Mais nos habitudes s’etaient faites telles que, non contents de dejeuner en face l’un de l’autre, je le ramenais diner presque tous les jours chez moi. Cela dura une quinzaine: puis il fut rappele en Angleterre. Mais il revint, et nous fimes encore une bonne etape de vie intellectuelle, morale280 et philosophique. Je crois qu’il me rendait deja tout ce que j’eprouvais de sympathie et d’estime, et que je ne fus pas pour rien dans son retour a Paris.
Chose singuliere! nous nous etions attaches l’un a l’autre par10 les sous-entendus bien plus que par la matiere de nos conversations. A vrai dire, nous etions presque toujours en discussion; et il nous arrivait de nous rire au nez l’un et l’autre pendant des heures, tant nous nous etonnions reciproquement de la diversite de nos points de vue. Je le trouvais si Anglais, et il me trouvais si Francais! Il etait si franchement revolte de certaines choses qu’il voyait chez nous, et je comprenais si mal certaines choses qui se passaient chez vous! Rien de plus interessant que ces contacts qui etaient des contrastes, et que ces rencontres d’idees qui etaient des choses; rien de si attachant que les echappees de coeur ou d’esprit auxquelles ces petits conflits donnaient a tout moment cours. C’est dans ces conditions que, pendant son sejour a Paris en 1878, je conduisis un peu partout mon nouvel ami. Nous all?mes chez Madame Edmond Adam, ou il vit passer beaucoup d’hommes politiques avec lesquels il causa. Mais c’est chez les ministres qu’il fut interesse. Le moment etait, d’ailleurs, curieux en France. Je me rappelle que, lorsque je le presentai au Ministre du Commerce, il fit cette spirituelle repartie: ‘C’est la seconde fois que je viens en France sous la Republique. La premiere fois, c’etait en 1848, elle s’etait coiffee de travers: je suis bien heureux de saluer aujourd’hui votre excellence281, quand elle a mis son chapeau droit.’ Une fois je le menai voir couronner la Rosiere de Nanterre. Il y suivit les ceremonies civiles et religieuses; il y assista au banquet donne par le Maire; il y vit notre de Lesseps, auquel il porta un toast. Le soir, nous revinmes tard a Paris; il faisait chaud; nous etions un peu fatigues282; nous entr?mes dans un des rares cafes encore ouverts. Il devint silencieux. — ‘N’etes-vous pas content de votre journee?’ lui dis-je. — ‘O, si! mais je reflechis, et je me dis que vous etes un peuple gai — tous ces braves gens etaient gais aujourd’hui. C’est une vertu, la gaiete, et vous l’avez en France, cette vertu!’ Il me disait cela melancoliquement; et c’etait la premiere fois que je lui entendais faire une louange adressee a la France. . . . Mais il ne faut pas que vous voyiez la une plainte de ma part. Je serais un ingrat si je me plaignais; car il me disait souvent: ‘Quel bon Francais vous faites!’ Et il m’aimait a cause de cela, quoiqu’il sembl?t n’ainier pas la France. C’etait la un trait de son originalite. Il est vrai qu’il s’en tirait en disant que je ne ressemblai pas a mes compatriotes, ce a quoi il ne connaissait rien! — Tout cela etait fort curieux; car, moi-meme, je l’aimais quoiqu’il en e-t a mon pays!
En 1879 il amena son fils Austin a Paris. J’attirai celui-ci. Il dejeunait avec moi deux fois par semaine. Je lui montrai ce qu’etait l’intimite francaise en le tutoyant paternellement. Cela reserra beaucoup nos liens283 d’intimite avec Jenkin. . . . Je fis inviter mon ami au congres de L’Association Francaise Pour l’Avancement des Sciences, qui se tenait a Rheims en 1880. Il y vint. J’eus le plaisir de lui donner la parole dans la section du genie284 civil et militaire, que je presidais. II y fit une tres interessante communication, qui me montrait une fois de plus l’originalite de ses vaes et la s-rete de sa science. C’est a l’issue de ce congres que je passai lui faire visite a Rochefort, ou je le trouvai installe en famille et ou je presentai pour la premiere fois mes hommages a son eminente compagne. Je le vis la sous un jour nouveau et touchant pour moi. Madame Jenkin, qu’il entourait si galamment, et ses deux jeunes fils donnaient encore plus de relief a sa personne. J’emportai des quelques heures que je passai a cote de lui dans ce charmant paysage un souvenir emu.
J’etais alle en Angleterre en 1882 sans pouvoir gagner Edimbourg. J’y retournai en 1883 avec la commission d’assainissement de la ville de Paris, dont je faisais partie. Jenkin me rejoignit. Je le fis entendre par mes collegues; car il etait fondateur d’une societe de salubrite. Il eut un grand succes parmi nous. Mais ce voyaye me restera toujours en memoire parce que c’est la que se fixa defenitivement notre forte285 amitie. Il m’invita un jour a diner a son club et au moment de me faire asseoir a cote de lui, il me retint et me dit: ‘Je voudrais vous demander de m’accorder quelque chose. C’est mon sentiment que nos relations ne peuvent pas se bien continuer si vous ne me donnez pas la permission de vous tutoyer. Voulez-vous que nous nous tutoyions?’ Je lui pris les mains et je lui dis qu’une pareille proposition venant d’un Anglais, et d’un Anglais de sa haute distinction, c’etait une victoire, dont je serais fier toute ma vie. Et nous commencions a user de cette nouvelle forme dans nos rapports286. Vous savez avec quelle finesse287 il parlait le francais: comme il en connaissait tous les tours, comme il jouait avec ses difficultes, et meme avec ses petites gamineries. Je crois qu’il a ete heureux de pratiquer avec moi ce tutoiement, qui ne s’adapte pas a l’anglais, et qui est si francais. Je ne puis vous peindre l’etendue et la variete de nos conversations de la soiree. Mais ce que je puis vous dire, c’est que, sous la caresse du tu, nos idees se sont elevees. Nous avions toujours beaucoup ri ensemble; mais nous n’avions jamais laisse des banalites s’introduire dans nos echanges de pensees. Ce soir-la, notre horizon intellectual s’est elargie, et nous y avons pousse des reconnaissances profondes et lointaines. Apres avoir vivement cause a table, nous avons longuement cause au salon288; et nous nous separions le soir a Trafalgar Square, apres avoir longe les trotters, stationne aux coins des rues289 et deux fois rebrousse chemie en nous reconduisant l’un l’autre. Il etait pres d’une heure du matin! Mais quelle belle290 passe d’argumentation, quels beaux echanges de sentiments, quelles fortes291 confidences patriotiques nous avions fournies! J’ai compris ce soir la que Jenkin ne detestait pas la France, et je lui serrai fort les mains en l’embrassant. Nous nous quittions aussi amis qu’on puisse l’etre; et notre affection s’etait par lui etendue et comprise dans un tu francais.
点击收听单词发音
1 highland | |
n.(pl.)高地,山地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 rustic | |
adj.乡村的,有乡村特色的;n.乡下人,乡巴佬 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 theatricals | |
n.(业余性的)戏剧演出,舞台表演艺术;职业演员;戏剧的( theatrical的名词复数 );剧场的;炫耀的;戏剧性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 sanitary | |
adj.卫生方面的,卫生的,清洁的,卫生的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 maturity | |
n.成熟;完成;(支票、债券等)到期 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 heroism | |
n.大无畏精神,英勇 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 narration | |
n.讲述,叙述;故事;记叙体 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 forth | |
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 metropolitan | |
adj.大城市的,大都会的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 par | |
n.标准,票面价值,平均数量;adj.票面的,平常的,标准的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 pedantic | |
adj.卖弄学问的;迂腐的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 favourably | |
adv. 善意地,赞成地 =favorably | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 metropolis | |
n.首府;大城市 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 thorny | |
adj.多刺的,棘手的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 cardinal | |
n.(天主教的)红衣主教;adj.首要的,基本的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 virtue | |
n.德行,美德;贞操;优点;功效,效力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 archer | |
n.射手,弓箭手 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 genial | |
adj.亲切的,和蔼的,愉快的,脾气好的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 lighter | |
n.打火机,点火器;驳船;v.用驳船运送;light的比较级 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 delightful | |
adj.令人高兴的,使人快乐的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 erratic | |
adj.古怪的,反复无常的,不稳定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 dire | |
adj.可怕的,悲惨的,阴惨的,极端的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 maidens | |
处女( maiden的名词复数 ); 少女; 未婚女子; (板球运动)未得分的一轮投球 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 graphic | |
adj.生动的,形象的,绘画的,文字的,图表的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 acting | |
n.演戏,行为,假装;adj.代理的,临时的,演出用的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 plunging | |
adj.跳进的,突进的v.颠簸( plunge的现在分词 );暴跌;骤降;突降 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 pious | |
adj.虔诚的;道貌岸然的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 artistic | |
adj.艺术(家)的,美术(家)的;善于艺术创作的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 squandered | |
v.(指钱,财产等)浪费,乱花( squander的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 drawn | |
v.拖,拉,拔出;adj.憔悴的,紧张的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 intensity | |
n.强烈,剧烈;强度;烈度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 bent | |
n.爱好,癖好;adj.弯的;决心的,一心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 momentary | |
adj.片刻的,瞬息的;短暂的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 invoke | |
v.求助于(神、法律);恳求,乞求 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 muse | |
n.缪斯(希腊神话中的女神),创作灵感 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 teeming | |
adj.丰富的v.充满( teem的现在分词 );到处都是;(指水、雨等)暴降;倾注 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 conversing | |
v.交谈,谈话( converse的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 jack | |
n.插座,千斤顶,男人;v.抬起,提醒,扛举;n.(Jake)杰克 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 scholastic | |
adj.学校的,学院的,学术上的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 algebra | |
n.代数学 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 smack | |
vt.拍,打,掴;咂嘴;vi.含有…意味;n.拍 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 tempted | |
v.怂恿(某人)干不正当的事;冒…的险(tempt的过去分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 thoroughly | |
adv.完全地,彻底地,十足地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 sluggard | |
n.懒人;adj.懒惰的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 embarked | |
乘船( embark的过去式和过去分词 ); 装载; 从事 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 mid | |
adj.中央的,中间的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 immediate | |
adj.立即的;直接的,最接近的;紧靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 despatch | |
n./v.(dispatch)派遣;发送;n.急件;新闻报道 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 interfere | |
v.(in)干涉,干预;(with)妨碍,打扰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 contemplates | |
深思,细想,仔细考虑( contemplate的第三人称单数 ); 注视,凝视; 考虑接受(发生某事的可能性); 深思熟虑,沉思,苦思冥想 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 discomfited | |
v.使为难( discomfit的过去式和过去分词);使狼狈;使挫折;挫败 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 giggle | |
n.痴笑,咯咯地笑;v.咯咯地笑着说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 plunge | |
v.跳入,(使)投入,(使)陷入;猛冲 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 stolid | |
adj.无动于衷的,感情麻木的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 brute | |
n.野兽,兽性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 pony | |
adj.小型的;n.小马 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 trots | |
小跑,急走( trot的名词复数 ); 匆匆忙忙地走 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 awe | |
n.敬畏,惊惧;vt.使敬畏,使惊惧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61 tout | |
v.推销,招徕;兜售;吹捧,劝诱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62 lame | |
adj.跛的,(辩解、论据等)无说服力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63 cram | |
v.填塞,塞满,临时抱佛脚,为考试而学习 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64 manly | |
adj.有男子气概的;adv.男子般地,果断地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65 fully | |
adv.完全地,全部地,彻底地;充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
66 oar | |
n.桨,橹,划手;v.划行 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
67 steer | |
vt.驾驶,为…操舵;引导;vi.驾驶 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
68 salmon | |
n.鲑,大马哈鱼,橙红色的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
69 elusive | |
adj.难以表达(捉摸)的;令人困惑的;逃避的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
70 tact | |
n.机敏,圆滑,得体 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
71 feat | |
n.功绩;武艺,技艺;adj.灵巧的,漂亮的,合适的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
72 corruption | |
n.腐败,堕落,贪污 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
73 hurrahing | |
v.好哇( hurrah的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
74 pier | |
n.码头;桥墩,桥柱;[建]窗间壁,支柱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
75 seaman | |
n.海员,水手,水兵 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
76 lodge | |
v.临时住宿,寄宿,寄存,容纳;n.传达室,小旅馆 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
77 kindly | |
adj.和蔼的,温和的,爽快的;adv.温和地,亲切地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
78 skulked | |
v.潜伏,偷偷摸摸地走动,鬼鬼祟祟地活动( skulk的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
79 gale | |
n.大风,强风,一阵闹声(尤指笑声等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
80 moor | |
n.荒野,沼泽;vt.(使)停泊;vi.停泊 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
81 dingy | |
adj.昏暗的,肮脏的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
82 leeward | |
adj.背风的;下风的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
83 procured | |
v.(努力)取得, (设法)获得( procure的过去式和过去分词 );拉皮条 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
84 swell | |
vi.膨胀,肿胀;增长,增强 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
85 ornaments | |
n.装饰( ornament的名词复数 );点缀;装饰品;首饰v.装饰,点缀,美化( ornament的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
86 pinnacle | |
n.尖塔,尖顶,山峰;(喻)顶峰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
87 mere | |
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
88 foul | |
adj.污秽的;邪恶的;v.弄脏;妨害;犯规;n.犯规 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
89 mishap | |
n.不幸的事,不幸;灾祸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
90 bulged | |
凸出( bulge的过去式和过去分词 ); 充满; 塞满(某物) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
91 steering | |
n.操舵装置 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
92 commotion | |
n.骚动,动乱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
93 boiler | |
n.锅炉;煮器(壶,锅等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
94 peril | |
n.(严重的)危险;危险的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
95 persevered | |
v.坚忍,坚持( persevere的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
96 patois | |
n.方言;混合语 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
97 appreciations | |
n.欣赏( appreciation的名词复数 );感激;评定;(尤指土地或财产的)增值 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
98 deigned | |
v.屈尊,俯就( deign的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
99 gut | |
n.[pl.]胆量;内脏;adj.本能的;vt.取出内脏 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
100 trenchant | |
adj.尖刻的,清晰的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
101 philosophic | |
adj.哲学的,贤明的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
102 prettily | |
adv.优美地;可爱地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
103 avowed | |
adj.公开声明的,承认的v.公开声明,承认( avow的过去式和过去分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
104 loft | |
n.阁楼,顶楼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
105 refreshments | |
n.点心,便餐;(会议后的)简单茶点招 待 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
106 plumed | |
饰有羽毛的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
107 etiquette | |
n.礼仪,礼节;规矩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
108 coterie | |
n.(有共同兴趣的)小团体,小圈子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
109 dwelling | |
n.住宅,住所,寓所 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
110 sedulous | |
adj.勤勉的,努力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
111 punctilious | |
adj.谨慎的,谨小慎微的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
112 knack | |
n.诀窍,做事情的灵巧的,便利的方法 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
113 gratitude | |
adj.感激,感谢 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
114 determined | |
adj.坚定的;有决心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
115 eloquence | |
n.雄辩;口才,修辞 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
116 discretion | |
n.谨慎;随意处理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
117 charades | |
n.伪装( charade的名词复数 );猜字游戏 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
118 belch | |
v.打嗝,喷出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
119 farce | |
n.闹剧,笑剧,滑稽戏;胡闹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
120 herald | |
vt.预示...的来临,预告,宣布,欢迎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
121 schooling | |
n.教育;正规学校教育 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
122 aspire | |
vi.(to,after)渴望,追求,有志于 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
123 rehearsal | |
n.排练,排演;练习 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
124 stifle | |
vt.使窒息;闷死;扼杀;抑止,阻止 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
125 recipients | |
adj.接受的;受领的;容纳的;愿意接受的n.收件人;接受者;受领者;接受器 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
126 laborious | |
adj.吃力的,努力的,不流畅 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
127 mimic | |
v.模仿,戏弄;n.模仿他人言行的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
128 meritorious | |
adj.值得赞赏的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
129 meritoriously | |
参考例句: |
|
|
130 alas | |
int.唉(表示悲伤、忧愁、恐惧等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
131 chisel | |
n.凿子;v.用凿子刻,雕,凿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
132 toiled | |
长时间或辛苦地工作( toil的过去式和过去分词 ); 艰难缓慢地移动,跋涉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
133 intonation | |
n.语调,声调;发声 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
134 ingenuity | |
n.别出心裁;善于发明创造 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
135 simplicity | |
n.简单,简易;朴素;直率,单纯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
136 elegance | |
n.优雅;优美,雅致;精致,巧妙 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
137 levities | |
n.欠考虑( levity的名词复数 );不慎重;轻率;轻浮 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
138 admiration | |
n.钦佩,赞美,羡慕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
139 accomplishment | |
n.完成,成就,(pl.)造诣,技能 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
140 accomplishments | |
n.造诣;完成( accomplishment的名词复数 );技能;成绩;成就 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
141 bracing | |
adj.令人振奋的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
142 perseverance | |
n.坚持不懈,不屈不挠 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
143 zest | |
n.乐趣;滋味,风味;兴趣 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
144 plumbers | |
n.管子工,水暖工( plumber的名词复数 );[美][口](防止泄密的)堵漏人员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
145 dwellings | |
n.住处,处所( dwelling的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
146 prospered | |
成功,兴旺( prosper的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
147 jaunt | |
v.短程旅游;n.游览 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
148 banter | |
n.嘲弄,戏谑;v.取笑,逗弄,开玩笑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
149 bantered | |
v.开玩笑,说笑,逗乐( banter的过去式和过去分词 );(善意地)取笑,逗弄 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
150 broach | |
v.开瓶,提出(题目) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
151 enjoyment | |
n.乐趣;享有;享用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
152 revelling | |
v.作乐( revel的现在分词 );狂欢;着迷;陶醉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
153 grudge | |
n.不满,怨恨,妒嫉;vt.勉强给,不情愿做 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
154 resolute | |
adj.坚决的,果敢的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
155 misery | |
n.痛苦,苦恼,苦难;悲惨的境遇,贫苦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
156 malicious | |
adj.有恶意的,心怀恶意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
157 trespasses | |
罪过( trespass的名词复数 ); 非法进入 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
158 confession | |
n.自白,供认,承认 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
159 malice | |
n.恶意,怨恨,蓄意;[律]预谋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
160 passionate | |
adj.热情的,热烈的,激昂的,易动情的,易怒的,性情暴躁的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
161 prolific | |
adj.丰富的,大量的;多产的,富有创造力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
162 bazaar | |
n.集市,商店集中区 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
163 marvel | |
vi.(at)惊叹vt.感到惊异;n.令人惊异的事 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
164 specimen | |
n.样本,标本 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
165 lieutenant | |
n.陆军中尉,海军上尉;代理官员,副职官员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
166 scoff | |
n.嘲笑,笑柄,愚弄;v.嘲笑,嘲弄,愚弄,狼吞虎咽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
167 raffle | |
n.废物,垃圾,抽奖售卖;v.以抽彩出售 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
168 tinfoil | |
n.锡纸,锡箔 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
169 distinguished | |
adj.卓越的,杰出的,著名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
170 commemorating | |
v.纪念,庆祝( commemorate的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
171 scotch | |
n.伤口,刻痕;苏格兰威士忌酒;v.粉碎,消灭,阻止;adj.苏格兰(人)的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
172 laboriously | |
adv.艰苦地;费力地;辛勤地;(文体等)佶屈聱牙地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
173 ardent | |
adj.热情的,热烈的,强烈的,烈性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
174 utterance | |
n.用言语表达,话语,言语 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
175 inquiries | |
n.调查( inquiry的名词复数 );疑问;探究;打听 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
176 vowel | |
n.元音;元音字母 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
177 trifling | |
adj.微不足道的;没什么价值的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
178 depicts | |
描绘,描画( depict的第三人称单数 ); 描述 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
179 fables | |
n.寓言( fable的名词复数 );神话,传说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
180 mighty | |
adj.强有力的;巨大的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
181 attained | |
(通常经过努力)实现( attain的过去式和过去分词 ); 达到; 获得; 达到(某年龄、水平、状况) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
182 innocence | |
n.无罪;天真;无害 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
183 stature | |
n.(高度)水平,(高度)境界,身高,身材 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
184 vivacity | |
n.快活,活泼,精神充沛 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
185 paradox | |
n.似乎矛盾却正确的说法;自相矛盾的人(物) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
186 quelled | |
v.(用武力)制止,结束,镇压( quell的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
187 reproof | |
n.斥责,责备 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
188 solace | |
n.安慰;v.使快乐;vt.安慰(物),缓和 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
189 contemned | |
v.侮辱,蔑视( contemn的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
190 humble | |
adj.谦卑的,恭顺的;地位低下的;v.降低,贬低 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
191 apprehension | |
n.理解,领悟;逮捕,拘捕;忧虑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
192 naught | |
n.无,零 [=nought] | |
参考例句: |
|
|
193 justify | |
vt.证明…正当(或有理),为…辩护 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
194 assortment | |
n.分类,各色俱备之物,聚集 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
195 eloquent | |
adj.雄辩的,口才流利的;明白显示出的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
196 dabble | |
v.涉足,浅赏 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
197 journalism | |
n.新闻工作,报业 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
198 broached | |
v.谈起( broach的过去式和过去分词 );打开并开始用;用凿子扩大(或修光);(在桶上)钻孔取液体 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
199 repent | |
v.悔悟,悔改,忏悔,后悔 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
200 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
201 belied | |
v.掩饰( belie的过去式和过去分词 );证明(或显示)…为虚假;辜负;就…扯谎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
202 perfectly | |
adv.完美地,无可非议地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
203 reconciliation | |
n.和解,和谐,一致 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
204 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
205 intimacy | |
n.熟悉,亲密,密切关系,亲昵的言行 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
206 inhuman | |
adj.残忍的,不人道的,无人性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
207 ripen | |
vt.使成熟;vi.成熟 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
208 mingled | |
混合,混入( mingle的过去式和过去分词 ); 混进,与…交往[联系] | |
参考例句: |
|
|
209 inflicted | |
把…强加给,使承受,遭受( inflict的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
210 drolly | |
adv.古里古怪地;滑稽地;幽默地;诙谐地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
211 piety | |
n.虔诚,虔敬 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
212 varied | |
adj.多样的,多变化的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
213 conformity | |
n.一致,遵从,顺从 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
214 aloof | |
adj.远离的;冷淡的,漠不关心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
215 atheist | |
n.无神论者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
216 wont | |
adj.习惯于;v.习惯;n.习惯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
217 verge | |
n.边,边缘;v.接近,濒临 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
218 nonentity | |
n.无足轻重的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
219 jargon | |
n.术语,行话 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
220 atheistic | |
adj.无神论者的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
221 hovering | |
鸟( hover的现在分词 ); 靠近(某事物); (人)徘徊; 犹豫 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
222 uncertainties | |
无把握( uncertainty的名词复数 ); 不确定; 变化不定; 无把握、不确定的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
223 refinements | |
n.(生活)风雅;精炼( refinement的名词复数 );改良品;细微的改良;优雅或高贵的动作 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
224 constrain | |
vt.限制,约束;克制,抑制 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
225 ethics | |
n.伦理学;伦理观,道德标准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
226 ambiguity | |
n.模棱两可;意义不明确 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
227 condemn | |
vt.谴责,指责;宣判(罪犯),判刑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
228 stimulating | |
adj.有启发性的,能激发人思考的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
229 positively | |
adv.明确地,断然,坚决地;实在,确实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
230 bestial | |
adj.残忍的;野蛮的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
231 strings | |
n.弦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
232 ascetic | |
adj.禁欲的;严肃的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
233 virtues | |
美德( virtue的名词复数 ); 德行; 优点; 长处 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
234 jovial | |
adj.快乐的,好交际的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
235 astute | |
adj.机敏的,精明的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
236 displeased | |
a.不快的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
237 belittle | |
v.轻视,小看,贬低 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
238 sustenance | |
n.食物,粮食;生活资料;生计 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
239 owls | |
n.猫头鹰( owl的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
240 marvelled | |
v.惊奇,对…感到惊奇( marvel的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
241 tyrant | |
n.暴君,专制的君主,残暴的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
242 marvelling | |
v.惊奇,对…感到惊奇( marvel的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
243 lessen | |
vt.减少,减轻;缩小 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
244 vein | |
n.血管,静脉;叶脉,纹理;情绪;vt.使成脉络 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
245 longing | |
n.(for)渴望 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
246 quenched | |
解(渴)( quench的过去式和过去分词 ); 终止(某事物); (用水)扑灭(火焰等); 将(热物体)放入水中急速冷却 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
247 mawkish | |
adj.多愁善感的的;无味的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
248 odyssey | |
n.长途冒险旅行;一连串的冒险 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
249 chivalrous | |
adj.武士精神的;对女人彬彬有礼的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
250 outgrew | |
长[发展] 得超过(某物)的范围( outgrow的过去式 ); 长[发展]得不能再要(某物); 长得比…快; 生长速度超过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
251 vividly | |
adv.清楚地,鲜明地,生动地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
252 professed | |
公开声称的,伪称的,已立誓信教的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
253 trenchantly | |
参考例句: |
|
|
254 wigging | |
n.责备,骂,叱责 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
255 wig | |
n.假发 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
256 wigs | |
n.假发,法官帽( wig的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
257 propriety | |
n.正当行为;正当;适当 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
258 canvassed | |
v.(在政治方面)游说( canvass的过去式和过去分词 );调查(如选举前选民的)意见;为讨论而提出(意见等);详细检查 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
259 wrangle | |
vi.争吵 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
260 petulant | |
adj.性急的,暴躁的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
261 dissimulation | |
n.掩饰,虚伪,装糊涂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
262 concealment | |
n.隐藏, 掩盖,隐瞒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
263 robust | |
adj.强壮的,强健的,粗野的,需要体力的,浓的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
264 pretence | |
n.假装,作假;借口,口实;虚伪;虚饰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
265 exuberant | |
adj.充满活力的;(植物)繁茂的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
266 combative | |
adj.好战的;好斗的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
267 captiousness | |
吹毛求疵的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
268 porcupine | |
n.豪猪, 箭猪 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
269 mortification | |
n.耻辱,屈辱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
270 thwarted | |
阻挠( thwart的过去式和过去分词 ); 使受挫折; 挫败; 横过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
271 ripening | |
v.成熟,使熟( ripen的现在分词 );熟化;熟成 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
272 malevolent | |
adj.有恶意的,恶毒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
273 preposterous | |
adj.荒谬的,可笑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
274 curiously | |
adv.有求知欲地;好问地;奇特地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
275 softened | |
(使)变软( soften的过去式和过去分词 ); 缓解打击; 缓和; 安慰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
276 darts | |
n.掷飞镖游戏;飞镖( dart的名词复数 );急驰,飞奔v.投掷,投射( dart的第三人称单数 );向前冲,飞奔 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
277 underlay | |
v.位于或存在于(某物)之下( underlie的过去式 );构成…的基础(或起因),引起n.衬垫物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
278 conspicuously | |
ad.明显地,惹人注目地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
279 ensemble | |
n.合奏(唱)组;全套服装;整体,总效果 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
280 morale | |
n.道德准则,士气,斗志 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
281 excellence | |
n.优秀,杰出,(pl.)优点,美德 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
282 fatigues | |
n.疲劳( fatigue的名词复数 );杂役;厌倦;(士兵穿的)工作服 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
283 liens | |
n.留置权,扣押权( lien的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
284 genie | |
n.妖怪,神怪 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
285 forte | |
n.长处,擅长;adj.(音乐)强音的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
286 rapports | |
n.友好关系(rapport的复数形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
287 finesse | |
n.精密技巧,灵巧,手腕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
288 salon | |
n.[法]沙龙;客厅;营业性的高级服务室 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
289 rues | |
v.对…感到后悔( rue的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
290 belle | |
n.靓女 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
291 fortes | |
n.特长,专长,强项( forte的名词复数 );强音( fortis的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |