The very unexpected welcome which the book has received prompts me to take this plan and means of replying to many who have honored me by writing me personal letters. First, permit me to thank those who have written letters of praise and gratitude1, and to say that, although I may be unable to reply in a private letter, I am not indifferent to these evidences of your interest, and am greatly helped in my work by your sympathy and encouragement. I have also received most courteous2 letters from various clergymen who, disagreeing with me, desire to convert me either by mail or personal (private) interviews.
It is wholly impossible for me to grant these requests, since my time and strength are demanded in other work, but I wish to say here what I have written to several of my clerical correspondents, and desire to say to them all.
Although I cannot enter into private correspondence with, nor grant personal interviews to, such a number of your body, I am entirely4 willing to respond in a public way to any replies to my arguments which come under the following conditions:
1. On page fourteen of the introduction to my book Col. Ingersoll says: “No human being can answer her arguments. There is no answer. All the priests in the world cannot explain away her objections. There is no explanation. They should remain dumb unless they can show that the impossible is the probable, that slavery is better than freedom, that polygamy is the friend of woman, that the innocent can justly suffer for the guilty, and that to persecute5 for opinion’s sake is an act of love and worship.”
Now, whenever any one of these gentlemen who wish to convert me will show that the Colonel is wrong in this brief paragraph; whenever they will, in print or in public, refute the arguments to which he refers, and to which they object, I shall not be slow to respond.
2. It must be argument, not personal abuse, and it must be conducted in a courteous manner and tone.
3. It must proceed upon the basis that I am as honest, as earnest, and as virtuous6 in my motives7 and intentions as they are in theirs.
Now, surely these gentlemen cannot object to these simple requirements; and since some of them are men whose names are preceded by a title and followed by several capital letters (ranging from D.D. to O.S.F. —— which last I, in my ignorance, guess at as meaning Order of St. Francis, but shall like to be corrected if I am wrong) they must believe that to answer the arguments themselves is both simple and easy.
If they do not so believe they surely have no right to occupy the positions which they do occupy. If they do so believe it will do much more good to answer them publicly, since they have been made publicly, and are already in the hands of several thousand people, who could not be reached by any amount of eloquence8 poured out on ray devoted9 head in the privacy of my own parlor10 (or writing-desk).
Therefore, gentlemen, permit me to say to you all that which I have already written to several of you personally — that Col. Ingersoll’s paragraph, quoted above, expresses my own views and those of a great many other people, and will continue so to do so long as your efforts to show that he is wrong are only whispered to me behind a fan, or in the strict seclusion11 of a letter marked “private and personal.”
The arguments I have given against the prevailing12 Christian13 dogmas and usages, which you uphold, are neither private nor personal, nor shall I allow them to take that phase. Life is too short for me to spend hours day after day in sustaining, in private, a public argument which has never been (and, in my opinion, never will be), refuted. And it would do no good to the thousands whom you are pleased to say you fear will be led astray by my position. You have a magnificent opportunity to lead them back again by honest public letters, or lectures, or sermons, not by an afternoon’s chat with me.
And, while I recognize the courtesy of your pressing requests (made, without exception, in the most gentlemanly terms) to permit you to meet me personally and refute my arguments, I feel compelled to say that, unless you are willing to show the courage of your convictions, and the quality of your defense14, to the public, I fear they would have no weight with me, and I should have wasted your precious time as well as my own, which I should feel I had no right to do, nor to allow you to do, without this frank statement of the case.
Now, do not suppose that I have the slightest objection to meeting the clergy3 personally and socially. Upon the contrary, many of my friends are clergymen — even bishops15 — but candor16 compels me to state that up to the present time not one of them has (either privately17 or otherwise) been able to answer either of the first two lectures in that little book, and as to the third one, no one of them, in my opinion, will ever try to answer it.
Time will show whether I am right in this.
In the mean time accept my thanks for your interest, and believe me,
Sincerely,
Helen H. Gardener.
Helen H. Gardener.
点击收听单词发音
1 gratitude | |
adj.感激,感谢 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 courteous | |
adj.彬彬有礼的,客气的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 clergy | |
n.[总称]牧师,神职人员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 persecute | |
vt.迫害,虐待;纠缠,骚扰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 virtuous | |
adj.有品德的,善良的,贞洁的,有效力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 motives | |
n.动机,目的( motive的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 eloquence | |
n.雄辩;口才,修辞 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 devoted | |
adj.忠诚的,忠实的,热心的,献身于...的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 parlor | |
n.店铺,营业室;会客室,客厅 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 seclusion | |
n.隐遁,隔离 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 prevailing | |
adj.盛行的;占优势的;主要的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 Christian | |
adj.基督教徒的;n.基督教徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 bishops | |
(基督教某些教派管辖大教区的)主教( bishop的名词复数 ); (国际象棋的)象 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 candor | |
n.坦白,率真 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 privately | |
adv.以私人的身份,悄悄地,私下地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |