We shall understand them better yet if we observe the scientist at work, and first of all it is necessary to know the psychologic mechanism6 of invention and, in particular, that of mathematical creation. Observation of the processes of the work of the mathematician is particularly instructive for the psychologist.
In all the sciences of observation account must be taken of the errors due to the imperfections of our senses and our instruments. Luckily, we may assume that, under certain conditions, these errors are in part self-compensating, so as to disappear in the average; this compensation is due to chance. But what is chance? This idea is difficult to justify7 or even to define; and yet what I have just said about the errors of observation, shows that the scientist can not neglect it. It therefore is necessary to give a definition as precise as possible of this concept, so indispensable yet so illusive8.
These are generalities applicable in sum to all the sciences; and for example the mechanism of mathematical invention does not differ sensibly from the mechanism of invention in general. Later I attack questions relating more particularly to certain special sciences and first to pure mathematics.
In the chapters devoted9 to these, I have to treat subjects a little more abstract. I have first to speak of the notion of space; every one knows space is relative, or rather every one says so, but many think still as if they believed it absolute; it suffices to reflect a little however to perceive to what contradictions they are exposed.
The questions of teaching have their importance, first in themselves, then because reflecting on the best way to make new ideas penetrate10 virgin11 minds is at the same time reflecting on how these notions were acquired by our ancestors, and consequently on their true origin, that is to say, in reality on their true nature. Why do children usually understand nothing of the definitions which satisfy scientists? Why is it necessary to give them others? This is the question I set myself in the succeeding chapter and whose solution should, I think, suggest useful reflections to the philosophers occupied with the logic5 of the sciences.
On the other hand, many geometers believe we can reduce mathematics to the rules of formal logic. Unheard-of efforts have been made to do this; to accomplish it, some have not hesitated, for example, to reverse the historic order of the genesis of our conceptions and to try to explain the finite by the infinite. I believe I have succeeded in showing, for all those who attack the problem unprejudiced, that here there is a fallacious illusion. I hope the reader will understand the importance of the question and pardon me the aridity12 of the pages devoted to it.
The concluding chapters relative to mechanics and astronomy will be easier to read.
Mechanics seems on the point of undergoing a complete revolution. Ideas which appeared best established are assailed13 by bold innovators. Certainly it would be premature14 to decide in their favor at once simply because they are innovators.
But it is of interest to make known their doctrines15, and this is what I have tried to do. As far as possible I have followed the historic order; for the new ideas would seem too astonishing unless we saw how they arose.
Astronomy offers us majestic16 spectacles and raises gigantic problems. We can not dream of applying to them directly the experimental method; our laboratories are too small. But analogy with phenomena17 these laboratories permit us to attain18 may nevertheless guide the astronomer19. The Milky20 Way, for example, is an assemblage of suns whose movements seem at first capricious. But may not this assemblage be compared to that of the molecules21 of a gas, whose properties the kinetic22 theory of gases has made known to us? It is thus by a roundabout way that the method of the physicist may come to the aid of the astronomer.
Finally I have endeavored to give in a few lines the history of the development of French geodesy; I have shown through what persevering23 efforts, and often what dangers, the geodesists have procured24 for us the knowledge we have of the figure of the earth. Is this then a question of method? Yes, without doubt, this history teaches us in fact by what precautions it is necessary to surround a serious scientific operation and how much time and pains it costs to conquer one new decimal.
点击收听单词发音
1 physicist | |
n.物理学家,研究物理学的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 mathematician | |
n.数学家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 instinctively | |
adv.本能地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 foretell | |
v.预言,预告,预示 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 logic | |
n.逻辑(学);逻辑性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 mechanism | |
n.机械装置;机构,结构 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 justify | |
vt.证明…正当(或有理),为…辩护 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 illusive | |
adj.迷惑人的,错觉的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 devoted | |
adj.忠诚的,忠实的,热心的,献身于...的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 penetrate | |
v.透(渗)入;刺入,刺穿;洞察,了解 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 virgin | |
n.处女,未婚女子;adj.未经使用的;未经开发的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 aridity | |
n.干旱,乏味;干燥性;荒芜 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 assailed | |
v.攻击( assail的过去式和过去分词 );困扰;质问;毅然应对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 premature | |
adj.比预期时间早的;不成熟的,仓促的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 doctrines | |
n.教条( doctrine的名词复数 );教义;学说;(政府政策的)正式声明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 majestic | |
adj.雄伟的,壮丽的,庄严的,威严的,崇高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 phenomena | |
n.现象 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 attain | |
vt.达到,获得,完成 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 astronomer | |
n.天文学家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 milky | |
adj.牛奶的,多奶的;乳白色的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 molecules | |
分子( molecule的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 kinetic | |
adj.运动的;动力学的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 persevering | |
a.坚忍不拔的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 procured | |
v.(努力)取得, (设法)获得( procure的过去式和过去分词 );拉皮条 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |