Let no one be surprised if, in speaking of entirely1 new principalities as I shall do, I adduce the highest examples both of prince and of state; because men, walking almost always in paths beaten by others, and following by imitation their deeds, are yet unable to keep entirely to the ways of others or attain2 to the power of those they imitate. A wise man ought always to follow the paths beaten by great men, and to imitate those who have been supreme3, so that if his ability does not equal theirs, at least it will savour of it. Let him act like the clever archers4 who, designing to hit the mark which yet appears too far distant, and knowing the limits to which the strength of their bow attains5, take aim much higher than the mark, not to reach by their strength or arrow to so great a height, but to be able with the aid of so high an aim to hit the mark they wish to reach.
I say, therefore, that in entirely new principalities, where there is a new prince, more or less difficulty is found in keeping them, accordingly as there is more or less ability in him who has acquired the state. Now, as the fact of becoming a prince from a private station presupposes either ability or fortune, it is clear that one or other of these things will mitigate6 in some degree many difficulties. Nevertheless, he who has relied least on fortune is established the strongest. Further, it facilitates matters when the prince, having no other state, is compelled to reside there in person.
But to come to those who, by their own ability and not through fortune, have risen to be princes, I say that Moses, Cyrus, Romulus, Theseus, and such like are the most excellent examples. And although one may not discuss Moses, he having been a mere7 executor of the will of God, yet he ought to be admired, if only for that favour which made him worthy8 to speak with God. But in considering Cyrus and others who have acquired or founded kingdoms, all will be found admirable; and if their particular deeds and conduct shall be considered, they will not be found inferior to those of Moses, although he had so great a preceptor. And in examining their actions and lives one cannot see that they owed anything to fortune beyond opportunity, which brought them the material to mould into the form which seemed best to them. Without that opportunity their powers of mind would have been extinguished, and without those powers the opportunity would have come in vain.
It was necessary, therefore, to Moses that he should find the people of Israel in Egypt enslaved and oppressed by the Egyptians, in order that they should be disposed to follow him so as to be delivered out of bondage9. It was necessary that Romulus should not remain in Alba, and that he should be abandoned at his birth, in order that he should become King of Rome and founder10 of the fatherland. It was necessary that Cyrus should find the Persians discontented with the government of the Medes, and the Medes soft and effeminate through their long peace. Theseus could not have shown his ability had he not found the Athenians dispersed11. These opportunities, therefore, made those men fortunate, and their high ability enabled them to recognize the opportunity whereby their country was ennobled and made famous.
Those who by valorous ways become princes, like these men, acquire a principality with difficulty, but they keep it with ease. The difficulties they have in acquiring it rise in part from the new rules and methods which they are forced to introduce to establish their government and its security. And it ought to be remembered that there is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous12 to conduct, or more uncertain in its success, than to take the lead in the introduction of a new order of things, because the innovator13 has for enemies all those who have done well under the old conditions, and lukewarm defenders14 in those who may do well under the new. This coolness arises partly from fear of the opponents, who have the laws on their side, and partly from the incredulity of men, who do not readily believe in new things until they have had a long experience of them. Thus it happens that whenever those who are hostile have the opportunity to attack they do it like partisans15, whilst the others defend lukewarmly, in such wise that the prince is endangered along with them.
It is necessary, therefore, if we desire to discuss this matter thoroughly16, to inquire whether these innovators can rely on themselves or have to depend on others: that is to say, whether, to consummate17 their enterprise, have they to use prayers or can they use force? In the first instance they always succeed badly, and never compass anything; but when they can rely on themselves and use force, then they are rarely endangered. Hence it is that all armed prophets have conquered, and the unarmed ones have been destroyed. Besides the reasons mentioned, the nature of the people is variable, and whilst it is easy to persuade them, it is difficult to fix them in that persuasion18. And thus it is necessary to take such measures that, when they believe no longer, it may be possible to make them believe by force.
If Moses, Cyrus, Theseus, and Romulus had been unarmed they could not have enforced their constitutions for long—as happened in our time to Fra Girolamo Savonarola, who was ruined with his new order of things immediately the multitude believed in him no longer, and he had no means of keeping steadfast19 those who believed or of making the unbelievers to believe. Therefore such as these have great difficulties in consummating20 their enterprise, for all their dangers are in the ascent21, yet with ability they will overcome them; but when these are overcome, and those who envied them their success are exterminated22, they will begin to be respected, and they will continue afterwards powerful, secure, honoured, and happy.
To these great examples I wish to add a lesser23 one; still it bears some resemblance to them, and I wish it to suffice me for all of a like kind: it is Hiero the Syracusan.(*) This man rose from a private station to be Prince of Syracuse, nor did he, either, owe anything to fortune but opportunity; for the Syracusans, being oppressed, chose him for their captain, afterwards he was rewarded by being made their prince. He was of so great ability, even as a private citizen, that one who writes of him says he wanted nothing but a kingdom to be a king. This man abolished the old soldiery, organized the new, gave up old alliances, made new ones; and as he had his own soldiers and allies, on such foundations he was able to build any edifice24: thus, whilst he had endured much trouble in acquiring, he had but little in keeping.
(*) Hiero II, born about 307 B.C., died 216 B.C.
点击收听单词发音
1 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 attain | |
vt.达到,获得,完成 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 archers | |
n.弓箭手,射箭运动员( archer的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 attains | |
(通常经过努力)实现( attain的第三人称单数 ); 达到; 获得; 达到(某年龄、水平、状况) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 mitigate | |
vt.(使)减轻,(使)缓和 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 mere | |
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 worthy | |
adj.(of)值得的,配得上的;有价值的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 bondage | |
n.奴役,束缚 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 Founder | |
n.创始者,缔造者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 dispersed | |
adj. 被驱散的, 被分散的, 散布的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 perilous | |
adj.危险的,冒险的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 innovator | |
n.改革者;创新者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 defenders | |
n.防御者( defender的名词复数 );守卫者;保护者;辩护者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 partisans | |
游击队员( partisan的名词复数 ); 党人; 党羽; 帮伙 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 thoroughly | |
adv.完全地,彻底地,十足地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 consummate | |
adj.完美的;v.成婚;使完美 [反]baffle | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 persuasion | |
n.劝说;说服;持有某种信仰的宗派 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 steadfast | |
adj.固定的,不变的,不动摇的;忠实的;坚贞不移的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 consummating | |
v.使结束( consummate的现在分词 );使完美;完婚;(婚礼后的)圆房 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 ascent | |
n.(声望或地位)提高;上升,升高;登高 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 exterminated | |
v.消灭,根绝( exterminate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 lesser | |
adj.次要的,较小的;adv.较小地,较少地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 edifice | |
n.宏伟的建筑物(如宫殿,教室) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |