Dear Sir,—In reply to your request that I should write an introduction to a work which you are about to compose on cremation1, I am placed in the great difficulty of knowing nothing of your book, not even having seen its title-page or table of contents. It is quite impossible, therefore, for me to say how far your views and my own may accord. But, as I suppose your object is to bring before the people of America proof of the evil effects to the living inseparable from the present mode of disposal of the dead by burying them in the earth, as well as to show how these evils may be avoided by burning dead bodies,—in a word, by the substitution of cremation for burial, of purification for putrefaction2,—I have great pleasure in doing the little that is in my power to assist in bringing a very important question of sanitary3 reform before a thoughtful, intelligent, and advancing nation.
I do not know how far I am right in supposing that with you in the West, as with us in the East, a knowledge of sanitary science, of the conditions which are necessary for the health of mankind, is still confined to the comparatively few who may be called the well educated class. Nor do I know how far this knowledge has been diffused4 among the classes of your population who have received but little education. But I do know xiiwith us it is the highest classes, in the sense of the best educated classes, who are the most earnest in their efforts to disseminate5 that branch of knowledge or science which, in the words of Parkes, aims at rendering6 “youth most perfect, decay less rapid, life more vigorous, and death more remote.” Parkes is dead, but he still speaks to us by his book, and he says:—
“The disposal of the dead is always a question of difficulty. If the dead are buried, so great at last is the accumulation of bodies that the whole country round a great city becomes gradually a vast cemetery7. After death, the buried body returns to its elements. If, instead of being buried, the body is burned, the same process occurs more rapidly. A community must always dispose of its dead, either by burial in land or water, or by burning, or chemical destruction equivalent to burning, or by embalming9 or preserving. The eventual10 dispersion of our frame is the same in all cases. Neither affection nor religion can be outraged11 by any manner of disposal of the dead which is done with proper solemnity and respect to the earthly dwelling-places of our friends. The question should be entirely12 placed on sanitary grounds. Burying in the ground appears certainly to be the most insanitary plan.”
Parkes died before we had learned how perfectly13 and cheaply, how rapidly and inoffensively cremation could be carried on; and he favored burying in the sea rather than in the earth, whenever the distance was not too great for transport. He knew well how impossible it is to prevent graveyards14 within towns, or suburban15 cemeteries16, from becoming sooner or later a source of danger or nuisance to the living, how difficult it is to xiiifind a suitable site and soil, sufficient space, and to secure proper regulations and management. These difficulties may not be so great amid your unlimited17 space as with us; but they must be an increasing evil in and around your large cities. I trust, therefore, that your work may assist in the more rapid progress of cremation as a substitute for burial.
With us the legal objection has ceased. It is now acknowledged by the government, and has been decided18 by three judges that if cremation is so performed as to create no nuisance, and incite19 to no breach20 of the peace, it is not illegal.
The religious objection has been answered by the Bishop21 of Manchester, by Canon Liddon, and by the Earl of Shaftesbury. The bishop said: “No intelligent faith can suppose that any Christian22 doctrine23 is affected24 by the manner in which this mortal body of ours crumbles25 into dust and sees corruption26.”
Canon Liddon said, in a sermon at St. Paul’s Cathedral:—
“The resurrection of a body from its ashes is not a greater miracle than the resurrection of an unburnt body; each must be purely27 miraculous28.”
Lord Shaftesbury said to me that any doubt as to the resurrection of a body because it had been burnt was an “audacious limitation of the Almighty”; and he asked, “What, then, has become of the blessed martyrs29 who were burned at the stake in ancient and modern persecution30?”
The medico-legal objection that murdered or poisoned persons if burned could not be exhumed31, as is sometimes done if suspicion of foul32 play arise after burial, is answered by the strict observance of proper regulations xivbefore cremation. Much more complete medical certificates as to the cause of death are required by the cremation society of England than by any cemetery company; and in some cases, a post-mortem examination is insisted on. In this way, cremation becomes a security to the public against secret poisoning or any form of murder.
The sentimental33 objection is that which can only be overcome by time and education. When the people know how great are the evils dependent on burial in the earth, even when this is done under the most favorable conditions, how seldom these conditions can be secured, and, when the knowledge becomes general that when a human body which would require five, ten, or twenty years to slowly putrefy in any soil can in one hour be cheaply and inoffensively converted into a white ash, public sentiment must favor cremation in place of corruption, and for putrefaction substitute purification. The same religious ceremonial might accompany either mode of disposal of the dead. The ashes might be dispersed34 to the winds, harmlessly buried, or preserved in urns8 near monuments or memorial tablets in our cemeteries, or beneath or around any place of worship, or in any family mausoleum, or in some park, public garden, or any ornamental35 open space near a great city, as the wishes of the dead or of the surviving relations and friends may prefer.
Here, we hope the city of London will be the first municipal body in the Kingdom to set the example in this sanitary reform. But, perhaps, the impetus36 may be given by our American cousins and brothers.
I am, dear sir, faithfully yours,
T. SPENCER WELLS.
点击收听单词发音
1 cremation | |
n.火葬,火化 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 putrefaction | |
n.腐坏,腐败 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 sanitary | |
adj.卫生方面的,卫生的,清洁的,卫生的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 diffused | |
散布的,普及的,扩散的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 disseminate | |
v.散布;传播 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 rendering | |
n.表现,描写 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 cemetery | |
n.坟墓,墓地,坟场 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 urns | |
n.壶( urn的名词复数 );瓮;缸;骨灰瓮 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 embalming | |
v.保存(尸体)不腐( embalm的现在分词 );使不被遗忘;使充满香气 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 eventual | |
adj.最后的,结局的,最终的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 outraged | |
a.震惊的,义愤填膺的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 perfectly | |
adv.完美地,无可非议地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 graveyards | |
墓地( graveyard的名词复数 ); 垃圾场; 废物堆积处; 收容所 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 suburban | |
adj.城郊的,在郊区的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 cemeteries | |
n.(非教堂的)墓地,公墓( cemetery的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 unlimited | |
adj.无限的,不受控制的,无条件的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 incite | |
v.引起,激动,煽动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 breach | |
n.违反,不履行;破裂;vt.冲破,攻破 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 bishop | |
n.主教,(国际象棋)象 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 Christian | |
adj.基督教徒的;n.基督教徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 doctrine | |
n.教义;主义;学说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 affected | |
adj.不自然的,假装的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 crumbles | |
酥皮水果甜点( crumble的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 corruption | |
n.腐败,堕落,贪污 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 purely | |
adv.纯粹地,完全地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 miraculous | |
adj.像奇迹一样的,不可思议的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 martyrs | |
n.martyr的复数形式;烈士( martyr的名词复数 );殉道者;殉教者;乞怜者(向人诉苦以博取同情) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 persecution | |
n. 迫害,烦扰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 exhumed | |
v.挖出,发掘出( exhume的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 foul | |
adj.污秽的;邪恶的;v.弄脏;妨害;犯规;n.犯规 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 sentimental | |
adj.多愁善感的,感伤的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 dispersed | |
adj. 被驱散的, 被分散的, 散布的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 ornamental | |
adj.装饰的;作装饰用的;n.装饰品;观赏植物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 impetus | |
n.推动,促进,刺激;推动力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |