This is hardly to be wondered at when the nature of such contracts comes to be considered. The "dust" or "slopping" contractor, or whatever he may be designated, can hardly be expected to be a philanthropist, whose principal object in carrying out his contract is that of benefiting his fellow creatures and not himself; on the contrary, it may fairly be assumed that the contractor's object is to[87] serve his own interests, and to make his contract pay. It is but natural, although the result may not be eminently6 satisfactory either to the ratepayers, who require a careful and systematic7 cleansing8 of their dustbins and streets, or to the Sanitary Authority and their officers who have to look after him. The officers, if they do their strict duty, will probably be engaged in constant disputes and litigation with the contractor as to the due and proper observance of the terms of his contract, and the consequence of their time being thus occupied instead of in other more important matters, is naturally detrimental9 to the interests of the ratepayers.
If we turn to the articles of agreement or contract usually drawn10 up between a Sanitary Authority and a contractor for scavenging, we find that they are generally very binding11 in their phraseology, and enter fully12 into the details of the work; they should state very clearly the number of times in every week that the contractor shall cause all the ashpits in the districts enumerated13 to be emptied and cleansed14, the manner in which this work shall be performed, and how the materials thus removed shall be disposed of and the place of their ultimate destination. The conditions should further specify15 what amount of manual, team labour, and carts, are necessary for the[88] work, and also what plant the contractor must keep in the way of ladders, baskets, shovels16, and brooms, &c. The conditions should also contain a carefully prepared list of the streets to be swept, and the manner and number of times this work must be executed, and arrange for the disposal of the materials thus removed.
In many such contracts it is found necessary to insert clauses binding the contractor under all sorts of fearful penalties, to be always at the disposal and under the commands of the inspector17 of nuisances, or such other officer or officers as the Sanitary Authority may appoint. The contractor's men also are forbidden to refuse gratuities18 (an order which they no doubt fully carry out?) and are directed on no account to remove either trade or garden refuse, and they are also enjoined19 to be "careful to consult the convenience of the householders in their visits, and to thoroughly clean up all dirt and litter that they may cause in the discharge of their duties." If they fail in any or either of these injunctions and commands, or for any other dereliction of duty, the inspector of nuisances, or such other officer as the Sanitary Authority shall appoint, may summarily dismiss them, without any reference being made on the subject to their employer the contractor, and in[89] fact the conditions have necessarily to be made so stringent20 and binding as to be either totally inoperative or open to grave abuses, or, on the other hand, the work can be carelessly and improperly21 executed by the contractor.
I am, therefore, strongly of opinion that the work of the collection of house refuse and cleansing the streets should be carried out by the Local Authority with their own officers and staff, and that executing this work by contract is a mistake and a false economy. It is, perhaps, true that it may be done in the latter manner at less actual cost to the ratepayers, but all public work should be done in the best manner possible, irrespective of cost, thoroughly, but without extravagance, and the result of such work, especially where it affects the cleanliness and the appearance of a town, soon fully repays any moderate extra cost that may thus have been incurred22, irrespective of the enormous benefit that is conferred upon any community by the reduction of disease and the death-rate by a proper attention to such necessary sanitary work.
点击收听单词发音
1 sanitary | |
adj.卫生方面的,卫生的,清洁的,卫生的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 contractor | |
n.订约人,承包人,收缩肌 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 contractors | |
n.(建筑、监造中的)承包人( contractor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 dispense | |
vt.分配,分发;配(药),发(药);实施 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 thoroughly | |
adv.完全地,彻底地,十足地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 eminently | |
adv.突出地;显著地;不寻常地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 systematic | |
adj.有系统的,有计划的,有方法的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 cleansing | |
n. 净化(垃圾) adj. 清洁用的 动词cleanse的现在分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 detrimental | |
adj.损害的,造成伤害的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 drawn | |
v.拖,拉,拔出;adj.憔悴的,紧张的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 binding | |
有约束力的,有效的,应遵守的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 fully | |
adv.完全地,全部地,彻底地;充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 enumerated | |
v.列举,枚举,数( enumerate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 cleansed | |
弄干净,清洗( cleanse的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 specify | |
vt.指定,详细说明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 shovels | |
n.铲子( shovel的名词复数 );锹;推土机、挖土机等的)铲;铲形部份v.铲子( shovel的第三人称单数 );锹;推土机、挖土机等的)铲;铲形部份 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 inspector | |
n.检查员,监察员,视察员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 gratuities | |
n.报酬( gratuity的名词复数 );小账;小费;养老金 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 enjoined | |
v.命令( enjoin的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 stringent | |
adj.严厉的;令人信服的;银根紧的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 improperly | |
不正确地,不适当地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 incurred | |
[医]招致的,遭受的; incur的过去式 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |