This is no new conclusion. The despair of institutions, and the inexorable “ye must be born again,” with Mrs Poyser’s stipulation16, “and born different,” recurs17 in every generation. The cry for the Superman did not begin with Nietzsche, nor will it end with his vogue18. But it has always been silenced by the same question: what kind of person is this Superman to be? You ask, not for a super-apple, but for an eatable apple; not for a superhorse, but for a horse of greater draught or velocity19. Neither is it of any use to ask for a Superman: you must furnish a specification20 of the sort of man you want. Unfortunately you do not know what sort of man you want. Some sort of goodlooking philosopher-athlete, with a handsome healthy woman for his mate, perhaps.
Vague as this is, it is a great advance on the popular demand for a perfect gentleman and a perfect lady. And, after all, no market demand in the world takes the form of exact technical specification of the article required. Excellent poultry21 and potatoes are produced to satisfy the demand of housewives who do not know the technical differences between a tuber and a chicken. They will tell you that the proof of the pudding is in the eating; and they are right. The proof of the Superman will be in the living; and we shall find out how to produce him by the old method of trial and error, and not by waiting for a completely convincing prescription22 of his ingredients.
Certain common and obvious mistakes may be ruled out from the beginning. For example, we agree that we want superior mind; but we need not fall into the football club folly of counting on this as a product of superior body. Yet if we recoil23 so far as to conclude that superior mind consists in being the dupe of our ethical24 classifications of virtues25 and vices26, in short, of conventional morality, we shall fall out of the fryingpan of the football club into the fire of the Sunday School. If we must choose between a race of athletes and a race of “good” men, let us have the athletes: better Samson and Milo than Calvin and Robespierre. But neither alternative is worth changing for: Samson is no more a Superman than Calvin. What then are we to do?

点击
收听单词发音

1
incapable
![]() |
|
adj.无能力的,不能做某事的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2
decided
![]() |
|
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3
providence
![]() |
|
n.深谋远虑,天道,天意;远见;节约;上帝 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4
formerly
![]() |
|
adv.从前,以前 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5
mere
![]() |
|
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6
capitalism
![]() |
|
n.资本主义 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7
monarchy
![]() |
|
n.君主,最高统治者;君主政体,君主国 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8
atheism
![]() |
|
n.无神论,不信神 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9
humanitarianism
![]() |
|
n.博爱主义;人道主义;基督凡人论 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10
illiteracy
![]() |
|
n.文盲 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11
crab
![]() |
|
n.螃蟹,偏航,脾气乖戾的人,酸苹果;vi.捕蟹,偏航,发牢骚;vt.使偏航,发脾气 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12
draught
![]() |
|
n.拉,牵引,拖;一网(饮,吸,阵);顿服药量,通风;v.起草,设计 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13
subduing
![]() |
|
征服( subdue的现在分词 ); 克制; 制服; 色变暗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14
folly
![]() |
|
n.愚笨,愚蠢,蠢事,蠢行,傻话 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15
aspiration
![]() |
|
n.志向,志趣抱负;渴望;(语)送气音;吸出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16
stipulation
![]() |
|
n.契约,规定,条文;条款说明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17
recurs
![]() |
|
再发生,复发( recur的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18
Vogue
![]() |
|
n.时髦,时尚;adj.流行的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19
velocity
![]() |
|
n.速度,速率 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20
specification
![]() |
|
n.详述;[常pl.]规格,说明书,规范 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21
poultry
![]() |
|
n.家禽,禽肉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22
prescription
![]() |
|
n.处方,开药;指示,规定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23
recoil
![]() |
|
vi.退却,退缩,畏缩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24
ethical
![]() |
|
adj.伦理的,道德的,合乎道德的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25
virtues
![]() |
|
美德( virtue的名词复数 ); 德行; 优点; 长处 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26
vices
![]() |
|
缺陷( vice的名词复数 ); 恶习; 不道德行为; 台钳 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |