“See here!” cried a friend of mine the other day, “you’re always crying down the magazines, but I’ll bet you couldn’t write a magazine story to save your neck!”
My dear boy, I never said I could write one—in fact, I am very sure I couldn’t; it’s all I can do to read them after the other people have written them. That is an infirmity which has, I am sure, interfered2 seriously with my labors3 as a critic—this inability to wade4 through everything that the magazine editors are kind enough to set before us. But I contrive[Pg 100] to keep in touch with contemporary fiction by frequenting the Mercantile Library, where I can not only read and write undisturbed, but also take note of what others are reading and writing. And toward the close of each month I make it a point to arrive very early of a morning and take a superficial glance at the pages of the different periodicals, in order to gain an idea of the relative popularity of each one, and of the stories which they contain. When I find a story that is smeared5 with the grime of innumerable hands, or a magazine that has been torn almost to shreds6 by scores of eager readers, I retire to a corner and try to find out the cause of all the trouble.
But this labor-saving system, excellent as it is in many ways, has its defects; and so it happened that I came very near missing one of the most charming stories that I have ever found in the pages of a magazine.
[Pg 101]One bleak7 autumnal morning not many years ago I paid one of my periodical early visits to the library, and had just finished my examination of the literary market when my eye happened to fall on the name of Fran?ois Coppée printed in about the last place in the world that one would be apt to look for it—namely, in the table of contents of Harper’s Magazine. It was signed to a story called “The Rivals,” and although the pages of that story were neither torn by nervous feminine claws nor blackened by grimy hands I began to read it, and as I read New York slipped away from me, the wheezing8 of the asthmatic patrons of the library became inaudible to me, for I was in Paris with the young poet and his two loves. When I had finished the book I looked up and saw that I was still in the library, for there were the shelves full of what are termed the “leading periodicals of the day,” and two elderly ladies were racing[Pg 102] across the room for the new number of Life.
And then in the fullness of my heart I gave thanks to the great firm of publishers that had dared to violate all the sacred traditions that have been handed down from the Bonnerian to the Johnsonian age of letters and print a story that could make me forget for half an hour that I had a thousand words of “humorous matter” to write before twelve o’clock.
It was sad to come back from the coulisses of the Vaudeville9 and find myself directly opposite the shelf containing the Chautauquan Magazine and within earshot of the rustling10 of Harper’s Bazar; but I turned to my work in a better spirit because of M. Coppée and the Harpers, and I have reason to believe that the quality of the “humorous matter” which I constructed that afternoon was superior in fibre and durability11 to the ordinary products of my hands. I know that a[Pg 103] dealer12 to whom I occasionally brought a basketful of my wares13 gave me an order the very next day to serve him once a week regularly thereafter, and as he has been a steady and prompt-paying customer ever since I have special cause to feel grateful to the famous house of Harper for the literary stimulus14 which the story gave me.
I have already alluded15 to the fact that the pages on which “The Rivals” was printed were not torn and discolored like those containing other much-read and widely discussed romances. It was this circumstance which led me to reflect on the difficulties and discouragement which confront the editor whose ambition it is to give his subscribers fiction of the very best literary quality. In this instance the experiment had been fairly tried and yet at the end of the month the virgin16 purity of these pages was, to me at least, sadly significant of the fact that Coppée’s delightful[Pg 104] work had not met with the appreciation17 which it deserved.
I did not, of course, lose sight of the fact that the story appealed almost exclusively to a class of people who keep their fingers clean (and have cleanly minds also), and that it was, therefore, not improbable that it had found more readers than the condition of its pages would indicate; but nevertheless I was forced to the reluctant admission that from a commercial point of view the publication of “The Rivals” had proved a failure; nor has the opinion which I formed then been upset by later observation and knowledge. All of which served to heighten my admiration19 for the enlightened policy which gave this unusual bit of fiction to the American public.
I said something of this sort to a friend of mine, who, although rather given to fault-finding, had to admit that the Harpers had done a praiseworthy and courageous[Pg 105] thing in printing M. Coppée’s story. “Yes,” said my friend, rather grudgingly20, “it was a big thing of Alden to buy that story; but if that story had been offered to them by an American they wouldn’t have touched it with a forty-foot pole.”
My friend was quite right, for if that story, or one like it, were offered in the literary market by an American writer, the editor to whom it was offered would know at once that it had been stolen, and would be perfectly21 justified22 in locking his office door and calling for the police. Coppée has simply told the story of a young poet beloved of two women, a shop-girl and an actress; and he has told it truthfully as well as artistically—so truthfully, in fact, that I shudder23 when I think of the number of people of the “Christian Endeavor” type who must have withdrawn24 their names from the Monthly’s subscription-list because of it. If I could be assured that the number of these[Pg 106] wretched Philistines25 were far exceeded by that of the intelligent men and women who added their names because of this important step in the direction of true art, I would feel far more confident than I do now of a bright near future for American letters.
The very next day after that on which I read “The Rivals” I was aroused by a sudden agitation26 which spread through the reading-room of the quiet library in which I was at work. The table on which my books and papers were spread shook so that the thought of a possible earthquake flashed across my startled mind, and I looked up in time to see the young woman opposite to me drop the tattered27 remnants of Harper’s Bazar, from which she had just deciphered an intricate pattern, rush across the room, and pounce28 upon a periodical which had just been placed on its shelf by the librarian. If she had been a second later the three other[Pg 107] women who approached at the same moment from three different parts of the room would have fought for this paper like ravening29 wolves.
The Christmas number of the Ladies’ Home Journal had arrived.
I do not know of any magazine which so truthfully reflects the literary tendency of the age as this extraordinary Philadelphia publication, and I am not surprised to learn, as I have on undisputed authority, that it has a larger circulation than any other journal of its class in this country. It is conducted by that gifted literary exploiter and brilliant romancer, Mr. E. W. Bok, the legitimate30 successor to Mr. Johnson, and the present crown-prince of American letters.
I took the trouble to examine the number which the librarian had removed, and found that it had been pawed perfectly black, while many of its pages were torn and frayed31 in a way that indicated that[Pg 108] they had found a host of eager readers. Here was pawed literature with a vengeance32, and so, after leaving the library that afternoon, I purchased a copy of the Christmas number, thrust it under my coat, and skulked33 home.
All that evening until well into the early hours of the new day, I sat with that marvelous literary production before me, eagerly devouring34 every line of its contents, and honestly admiring the number of high-priced advertisements which met my eye, and the high literary quality of many of them. When I finally pushed the Christmas number away and rose from my table it was with a feeling of enthusiasm tempered with awe1 for the many-sided genius that controlled and had devised this widely circulated and incomparable journal. I must confess, also, to a feeling of admiration tinged35 with envy that took possession of my soul as I read the serials36 to which were affixed38 the names[Pg 109] of some of the most distinguished39 writers in America. I have spoken in an earlier chapter of the “good bad stuff” produced by my friend the poet, and in which he took such honest pride; and I would like nothing better than to ask him his opinion of the “bad bad stuff” which the acknowledged leaders of our national school of letters had unblushingly contributed, and for which, as I have since learned, they were paid wages that were commensurate with their shame. Now the author who writes a good story is entitled to his just mead40 of praise, but what shall we say of the author who succeeds in selling for a large sum the serial37 that he wrote during his sophomore41 year in college? I say, and I am sure my friend the practical poet will agree with me, that he ought to be the president of an industrial life-insurance company.
As for the literary huckster who succeeds in distending42 the circulation of an[Pg 110] almost moribund43 weekly journal to unheard-of limits by the infusion44 of this and other equally bad bad stuff, I am at a loss for terms that will do fitting tribute to his ability, and must leave that duty for some more comprehensive reviewer of a future generation who will do full justice to the genius of our great contemporary in an exhaustive treatise46 on English Literature from Chaucer to Bok.
Although as yet only the heir apparent to the crown of letters, Mr. Bok has acquired an undeniable and far-reaching influence in the realm which he will one day be called upon to govern, and has strongly impressed his individuality on contemporaneous literature, in which respect his position is not unlike that of the Prince of Wales in England. Among the more noteworthy of the literary products which have added lustre47 to the period of his minority may be mentioned “Heart-to-Heart Talks about Pillow-shams”; “Why[Pg 111] My Father Loved Muffins,” by Mamie Dickens; “Where the Tidies Blow”; “The Needs of a Canary,” by the Rev45. Elijah Gas; and “How I Blow My Nose,” by the Countess of Aberdeen. Mr. Bok has also made a strong bid for the favor of the sex which is always gentle and fair by his vigorous championship of what is termed an “evening musicale,” an abomination which still flourishes in spite of the persistent48 and systematic49 efforts of strong, brave men to suppress it. A timely Christmas article on the subject, published about a year ago, was found to be almost illegible50 before it had been on the Mercantile Library shelves a fortnight. This article is by the wife of an eminent51 specialist in nervous diseases—it may be that she has an eye on her husband’s practice—and it contains elaborate instructions as to the best way of inflicting52 the evening musicale on peaceful communities. How to entrap53 the guests, what indigestibles to serve,[Pg 112] how to prevent the men from escaping when the bass54 viol begins its deadly work, and how to make them believe they have had a pleasant time, are among the minuti? treated in this invaluable55 essay.
It is by sheer force of tireless industry and a complete mastery of every detail of his prodigious56 literary enterprise that Mr. Bok has placed himself in the proud position which he occupies to-day. He is the acknowledged authority on such subjects as the bringing up of young girls, the care of infants, the cleansing57 of flannel58 garments, and the crocheting59 of door-mats. In the gentle art of tatting he has no superior, and has long held the medal as the champion light-weight tatter of America. In his leisure moments he “chats with Mrs. Burnett,” “spends evenings with Mark Twain,” and interviews the clever progeny60 of distinguished men in the interest of his widely circulated monthly.
The homely61 qualities to which I have[Pg 113] alluded in the preceding paragraph have made Mr. Bok our crown-prince, but he will live in history as the discoverer of a new force in literary mechanics—a force which may, with justice, be compared to the sound-waves which have been the mainspring of Mr. Edison’s inventions, and one which is destined62 to produce results so far-reaching and important that the most acute literary observer is utterly63 unable to make any estimate of them.
The use of the names of distinguished men and women to lend interest to worthless or uninteresting articles on topics of current interest dates back to the most remote period of the world’s history, but it was Mr. Bok who discovered, during a temporary depression in the celebrity64 market, that a vast horde65 of their relations were available for literary purposes, and that there was not much greater “pull” in the name of a citizen who had won distinction in commerce, art, literature,[Pg 114] in the pulpit or on the bench, than there was in those of his wife, his aunt, his sister, and his children even unto the third and fourth generation.
It was this discovery that led to the publication of the popular and apparently66 endless series of essays bearing such titles as “The Wives of Famous Pastors,” “Bright Daughters of Well-known Men,” “Proud Uncles of Promising67 Young Story-writers,” and “Invalid Aunts of Daring Athletes.” The masterpiece of these biographical batches68 was the one bearing the general head of “Faces We Seldom See,” and it was this one which established beyond all question or doubt the permanent worth and importance of Mr. Bok’s discovery. The faces of those whom we often see have been described in the public prints from time immemorial, but it was the editor of the Ladies’ Home Journal who discovered the great commercial value that lurked69 in the faces of men and[Pg 115] women who were absolutely unknown outside their own limited circles of friends.
Then the relations of the celebrities70 became writers on their own account, and straightway the pages of Mr. Bok’s invaluable magazine glistened71 with “How My Wife’s Great-uncle Wrote ‘Rip Van Winkle,’” by Peter Pointdexter; “My Childhood in the White House,” by Ruth McKee; “How Much Money My Uncle is Worth,” by Cornelius Waldorf Astorbilt: and “Recollections of R. B. Hayes,” by his ox and his ass18.
Even a well-trained mind becomes stunned72 and bewildered in an attempt to estimate the extent to which this newly discovered force can be carried. The imagination can no more grasp it than it can grasp the idea of either space or eternity73, and it is my firm belief that under the impetus74 already acquired in the Ladies’ Home Journal the hoofs75 of the relations of celebrities[Pg 116] will go clattering76 down through the literature of centuries as yet unborn.
In the mind of a celebrity the prospect77 is one calculated to rob the grave of half its repose78; nevertheless it must be a comfort to pass away in the great white light of fame, cheered by the thought that the stricken wife, the orphaned79 children, and the consumptive aunt are left with a perpetual source of income at their fingers’ ends.
A well-thumbed paragraph in a recent number of the Journal announces that Mr. Bok has trampled80 upon his diffident, sensitive nature to the extent of permitting “what he considers a very satisfactory portrait” of himself to be offered to his admirers at the low price of a quarter of a dollar apiece. This offer, which bears the significant heading “The Girl Who Loves Art,” is made with the express stipulation81 that intending purchasers shall not deepen the blush on the gifted editor’s[Pg 117] cheek by sending their orders direct to the Home Journal office, but shall address them direct to the photographer, Mr. C. M. Gilbert, of 926 Chestnut82 Street, Philadelphia.
I desire to add that I reprint this generous proposition of my own free will and without either solicitation83 on the part of Mr. Bok or hope of reward from the photographer whose precious privilege it has been to transmit to the cabinet-sized cardboard the likeness84 of America’s crown-prince. I would not do this for Mr. Gilder85, for Mr. Scribner, or for any of the Harpers. I would do it only for Mr. E. W. Bok.
点击收听单词发音
1 awe | |
n.敬畏,惊惧;vt.使敬畏,使惊惧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 interfered | |
v.干预( interfere的过去式和过去分词 );调停;妨碍;干涉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 labors | |
v.努力争取(for)( labor的第三人称单数 );苦干;详细分析;(指引擎)缓慢而困难地运转 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 wade | |
v.跋涉,涉水;n.跋涉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 smeared | |
弄脏; 玷污; 涂抹; 擦上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 shreds | |
v.撕碎,切碎( shred的第三人称单数 );用撕毁机撕毁(文件) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 bleak | |
adj.(天气)阴冷的;凄凉的;暗淡的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 wheezing | |
v.喘息,发出呼哧呼哧的喘息声( wheeze的现在分词 );哮鸣 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 vaudeville | |
n.歌舞杂耍表演 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 rustling | |
n. 瑟瑟声,沙沙声 adj. 发沙沙声的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 durability | |
n.经久性,耐用性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 dealer | |
n.商人,贩子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 wares | |
n. 货物, 商品 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 stimulus | |
n.刺激,刺激物,促进因素,引起兴奋的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 alluded | |
提及,暗指( allude的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 virgin | |
n.处女,未婚女子;adj.未经使用的;未经开发的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 appreciation | |
n.评价;欣赏;感谢;领会,理解;价格上涨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 ass | |
n.驴;傻瓜,蠢笨的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 admiration | |
n.钦佩,赞美,羡慕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 grudgingly | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 perfectly | |
adv.完美地,无可非议地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 justified | |
a.正当的,有理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 shudder | |
v.战粟,震动,剧烈地摇晃;n.战粟,抖动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 withdrawn | |
vt.收回;使退出;vi.撤退,退出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 philistines | |
n.市侩,庸人( philistine的名词复数 );庸夫俗子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 agitation | |
n.搅动;搅拌;鼓动,煽动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 tattered | |
adj.破旧的,衣衫破的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 pounce | |
n.猛扑;v.猛扑,突然袭击,欣然同意 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 ravening | |
a.贪婪而饥饿的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 legitimate | |
adj.合法的,合理的,合乎逻辑的;v.使合法 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 frayed | |
adj.磨损的v.(使布、绳等)磨损,磨破( fray的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 vengeance | |
n.报复,报仇,复仇 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 skulked | |
v.潜伏,偷偷摸摸地走动,鬼鬼祟祟地活动( skulk的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 devouring | |
吞没( devour的现在分词 ); 耗尽; 津津有味地看; 狼吞虎咽地吃光 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 tinged | |
v.(使)发丁丁声( ting的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 serials | |
n.连载小说,电视连续剧( serial的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 serial | |
n.连本影片,连本电视节目;adj.连续的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 affixed | |
adj.[医]附着的,附着的v.附加( affix的过去式和过去分词 );粘贴;加以;盖(印章) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 distinguished | |
adj.卓越的,杰出的,著名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 mead | |
n.蜂蜜酒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 sophomore | |
n.大学二年级生;adj.第二年的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 distending | |
v.(使)膨胀,肿胀( distend的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 moribund | |
adj.即将结束的,垂死的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 infusion | |
n.灌输 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 rev | |
v.发动机旋转,加快速度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 treatise | |
n.专著;(专题)论文 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 lustre | |
n.光亮,光泽;荣誉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 persistent | |
adj.坚持不懈的,执意的;持续的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 systematic | |
adj.有系统的,有计划的,有方法的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 illegible | |
adj.难以辨认的,字迹模糊的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 eminent | |
adj.显赫的,杰出的,有名的,优良的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 inflicting | |
把…强加给,使承受,遭受( inflict的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 entrap | |
v.以网或陷阱捕捉,使陷入圈套 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 bass | |
n.男低音(歌手);低音乐器;低音大提琴 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 invaluable | |
adj.无价的,非常宝贵的,极为贵重的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 prodigious | |
adj.惊人的,奇妙的;异常的;巨大的;庞大的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 cleansing | |
n. 净化(垃圾) adj. 清洁用的 动词cleanse的现在分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 flannel | |
n.法兰绒;法兰绒衣服 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 crocheting | |
v.用钩针编织( crochet的现在分词 );钩编 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60 progeny | |
n.后代,子孙;结果 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61 homely | |
adj.家常的,简朴的;不漂亮的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62 destined | |
adj.命中注定的;(for)以…为目的地的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63 utterly | |
adv.完全地,绝对地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64 celebrity | |
n.名人,名流;著名,名声,名望 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65 horde | |
n.群众,一大群 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
66 apparently | |
adv.显然地;表面上,似乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
67 promising | |
adj.有希望的,有前途的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
68 batches | |
一批( batch的名词复数 ); 一炉; (食物、药物等的)一批生产的量; 成批作业 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
69 lurked | |
vi.潜伏,埋伏(lurk的过去式与过去分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
70 celebrities | |
n.(尤指娱乐界的)名人( celebrity的名词复数 );名流;名声;名誉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
71 glistened | |
v.湿物闪耀,闪亮( glisten的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
72 stunned | |
adj. 震惊的,惊讶的 动词stun的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
73 eternity | |
n.不朽,来世;永恒,无穷 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
74 impetus | |
n.推动,促进,刺激;推动力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
75 hoofs | |
n.(兽的)蹄,马蹄( hoof的名词复数 )v.(兽的)蹄,马蹄( hoof的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
76 clattering | |
发出咔哒声(clatter的现在分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
77 prospect | |
n.前景,前途;景色,视野 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
78 repose | |
v.(使)休息;n.安息 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
79 orphaned | |
[计][修]孤立 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
80 trampled | |
踩( trample的过去式和过去分词 ); 践踏; 无视; 侵犯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
81 stipulation | |
n.契约,规定,条文;条款说明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
82 chestnut | |
n.栗树,栗子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
83 solicitation | |
n.诱惑;揽货;恳切地要求;游说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
84 likeness | |
n.相像,相似(之处) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
85 gilder | |
镀金工人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |