But apart from war in which we now know that “fair play” is ridiculously impossible, a little friendly hurting of each other in a roped ring and cold blood will do no harm to any two men. Not as a preparation for the hardships of warfare5, not necessarily as a means of self-defence, but in view of a fine ideal of physical fitness, the strain and pain of violent athletics6 should be perpetuated7. 202 And this, apart from the fun of the thing (which after all matters most) is the excuse and reason for amateur boxing. So let boxing be regarded as a sport, and let us leave it at that.
Old prejudices live with extraordinary vigour8: and boxing—the very fact of it—the peaceful and positively9 harmless encounter of two men with well-padded gloves stirs the deepest rancour still. We are not surprised at this rancour in people who are not English, French, or American: most of us have to take their point of view for granted, because we find it so difficult to capture. We think that bull-fights are barbarous, and a friend of mine who organised an amateur boxing competition in Monte Video and tried to hire the bull-ring for the purpose was prohibited by the Uruguayan authorities because boxing was—barbarous. You come up against a brick wall sometimes, and you can’t see through it, so it’s not the slightest good trying to explain the plants which grow on the other side.
But in England, and in America too, the prejudices of the “righteous overmuch,” in fact, the prejudices of the Puritan tradition against the Prize-Ring have lived on to regard modern boxing in a similar light. My personal prejudice against overmuch righteousness and the Puritan tradition make the gist11 of my researches into the history of the Prize-Ring and of professional boxing a very nasty pill to swallow, very painful to digest. I don’t know that I ever hoped to disprove calumnies12, for I had always supposed that there was no reason, but a mere13 love of softness and Pleasant-Sunday-Afternoon respectability behind these objections to boxing. But, as a matter of fact, I have found, to my disgust, that there is much to be said for the “respectable” view—not, of course, on Puritan grounds, but both on humane14 grounds and in the cause of good sportsmanship. I believe that sport to-day (I don’t say “amateur sport” because I am unable to recognise as sport any pastime that is not, in its true sense, “amateur”) is better and finer and more chivalrous15 than it has ever been. It is, as a rule, fair—quixotically fair very often, and the more quixotic it is the better. Where a good sportsman could 203 win a fight within the rules, but risks the chance of losing because, on a particular occasion, he is not satisfied that the letter of the rules is adequate, he is behaving quixotically, and as no one suffers but himself, his quixoticism doesn’t matter. A game is only a game.
We might almost define sportsmanship as quixotry, the giving of something for nothing. The word amateur in other relations has become derisive16, and has lost its genuine meaning. But an amateur in sport is still recognised as one who loves an occupation for its own sake. He loves it so much that he will deny himself softer pleasures in order to be proficient17, and is prepared to undergo serious hardship in its pursuit.
In an affair of life and death, sportsmanship is not involved. We try very hard indeed to make out that it is or that it ought to be, but a man who obeys the rules of—say—the Amateur Boxing Association when he is attacked in a dark lane by a ruffian with half a brick, will have no tribute to his wisdom in any obituary18 notice written by me.
Sport to-day is beautifully fair. Not so, invariably, are professional athletics.
The Prize-Ring, by its rules, the application of its rules, and the disregard of its rules was what ordinarily intelligent and humane people nowadays call brutal. The professional boxing contest is seldom that, though, as we have seen, individual cases of deliberate cruelty have been known. The object amongst the majority of professional pugilists nowadays is not the enjoyment19 of a good contest and the money for a contest fairly won, but the money alone for a contest won anyhow. The average pro10. is quite happy so long as the referee20 leaves him alone. He will do anything the referee lets him. What, he asks, is that official for? He is there to see fair play, and to stop the boxer21 if he does wrong.
But apart from the actual boxing, much connected with its “promotion” and management is so nauseously vulgar, false, unfair, and dishonest, that remaining prejudices based on that foundation are not unintelligible22.
The End
点击收听单词发音
1 brutal | |
adj.残忍的,野蛮的,不讲理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 brutality | |
n.野蛮的行为,残忍,野蛮 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 pessimists | |
n.悲观主义者( pessimist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 inevitable | |
adj.不可避免的,必然发生的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 warfare | |
n.战争(状态);斗争;冲突 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 athletics | |
n.运动,体育,田径运动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 perpetuated | |
vt.使永存(perpetuate的过去式与过去分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 vigour | |
(=vigor)n.智力,体力,精力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 positively | |
adv.明确地,断然,坚决地;实在,确实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 pro | |
n.赞成,赞成的意见,赞成者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 gist | |
n.要旨;梗概 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 calumnies | |
n.诬蔑,诽谤,中伤(的话)( calumny的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 mere | |
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 humane | |
adj.人道的,富有同情心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 chivalrous | |
adj.武士精神的;对女人彬彬有礼的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 derisive | |
adj.嘲弄的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 proficient | |
adj.熟练的,精通的;n.能手,专家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 obituary | |
n.讣告,死亡公告;adj.死亡的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 enjoyment | |
n.乐趣;享有;享用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 referee | |
n.裁判员.仲裁人,代表人,鉴定人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 boxer | |
n.制箱者,拳击手 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 unintelligible | |
adj.无法了解的,难解的,莫明其妙的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |