The baron had met De Guise in the Rue9 St. Honoré, and some words arose between them relative to the death of the late De Guise, who had been assassinated10 at Blois by order of Henry III. The baron was on foot, De Guise on horseback; he immediately alighted, and requested the baron to draw: the old man could scarcely believe that the chevalier was in earnest, 134 yet drew his sword in self-defence. He was aged11, and for years had been out of practice; whereas his antagonist12 was a young man, in the prime of life, and famed for his swordsmanship. His first thrust proved fatal, his sword passing through the body of his adversary13, who staggered to a shoemaker’s shop hard by, and fell down dead. His antagonist quietly remounted his horse, and rode off in the most unconcerned manner.
The deceased had a son about the same age as the chevalier, who upon hearing of his father’s death, was determined14 to avenge15 him. From the high rank and station of De Guise, he well knew that, if he fell, no part of Europe could afford him an asylum17 from prosecution18; yet was he determined in so just a cause to run every risk, and, as he did not dare approach the hotel of the proud nobleman, he sent him a challenge by his squire19, couched in the following respectful language.
“No one, my lord, can bear witness to the just reason of my sorrow more forcibly than your lordship; I therefore entreat20 your lordship to forgive my resentment21 when expressing my desire that you will do me the honour of meeting me sword in hand, to give me satisfaction for my father’s death. The esteem22 which I entertain for your well-known courage induces me to hope that your lordship will not 135 plead your high rank to avoid a meeting in which your honour is so deeply compromised, The gentleman who bears this, will conduct you to the place where I am waiting for your lordship with a good horse and two swords, of which you will have the choice; or, should your lordship prefer it, I shall attend you at any place you may command.”
The meeting took place on horseback; and, after a desperate conflict, the murderer of the father gave the son the satisfaction of taking his life also: while they were fighting, their seconds wounded each other. D’Audiguier, who gives the particulars of this duel23, adds, that “this victory would have been more gratifying to God if he had fought for the same cause that led his ancestors into Palestine!”
This De Guise was grandson of Henri de Lorraine, Duc de Guise, surnamed the Great, and who was killed at the siege of Orleans; his father, surnamed the Balafré, from a deep scar on the face, was assassinated at Blois: they were both looked upon as Doctors in the science of duelling, and their opinion and decision considered law.
This De Guise was banished24 to Italy by Richelieu, where he died in 1640. His son, Henri de Lorraine, was equally celebrated25 for his amorous26 adventures and chivalric27 achievements, and was brought to trial by Richelieu as an accomplice28 in the conspiracy29 of the Count 136 de Soissons, and sentenced to death, par16 contumace, as he had fled to Italy; but he returned afterwards to France, and we find him one of the champions in the celebrated carousel30 of 1662, having previously31 killed in a duel the Count de Coligny, grandson of the admiral, who was assassinated in the massacre32 of St. Barthelemi: with him ended the turbulent and bloodthirsty family of De Guise, as society was rid of him in 1664.
The Balafré had a third son, Louis, who was a cardinal33, and archbishop of Rheims. This prelate was a worthy35 scion36 of the desperate stock. He was often seen doffing37 his canonical38 vestments to don the cuirass and helm; he fought in the ranks of his sovereign during his expedition in Poitou, and died after the attack on Saint Jean d’Angely. This worthy member of the church militant39, having a lawsuit40 with the Duke de Nevers, wanted to decide the cause at the point of the sword.
D’Audiguier, who has related many of the duels41 of his time, was a gentleman belonging to the court of Louis XIII, and made a supplication42 to that monarch not only to cancel all edicts against duelling, but to allow the practice, in the following terms: “A great trial, Sire, is carried on between the nobility and the law in your Majesty43’s dominions44, in which you alone can decide: your nobility maintain 137 that a gentleman whose honour is impeached45 should either vindicate46 it with his sword, or forfeit47 his life; whereas law asserts that a gentleman who draws his sword shall lose his life: and surely your Majesty, who is the chief of the most generous nobility in existence, cannot feel it your interest thus to blunt their valour; or, under the vain pretence48 of preserving their honour, behold49 them reduced to the necessity of losing sight of its dictates50, or seek to maintain it with their pen, like the low-bred, disputing the right of arms before menial clerks.” Our advocate of the rights of honour concludes by imploring51 the King to render duels less frequent by permitting them to take place on certain occasions when the King himself should be present; and when the public, he adds, “instead of being involved in differences and lawsuits52, which consume both blood and fortune, would be delivered of the two monsters, and would feel proud of displaying their courage in your service, and their valour in your royal presence.”
Despite these arguments, various prohibitory edicts were issued during this reign: one in particular, dated 1626, forbade all applications for pardon or solicitation53 in favour of the criminals; and, like his predecessor54 Henri IV, Louis even denounced as criminal all such applications from the Queen, whom he called his 138 très chère et aymée compagne; he further protested and declared before Heaven, that he would never grant any exemption55 from this ordonnance. Notwithstanding the sanctity of these protestations, we find Louis XIII. granting a free pardon to duellists, “on account of the earnest entreaties57 made by his much-loved and dear sister, the Queen of Great Britain, upon the occasion of her marriage.”
Duels must have been of frequent occurrence during this reign, since Lord Herbert of Cherbury, then our ambassador at the French court, asserts that there was scarcely a Frenchman deemed worth looking on who had not killed his man in a duel.
This chivalric nobleman, to show the prevalence of duelling in France, and the respect in which duellists were held, relates the case of a M. Mennon, who being desirous to marry a niece of M. Disancour, who it was thought would be his heiress, was thus answered by him; “Friend, it is not time yet to marry: I will tell you what you must do if you will be a brave man. You must first kill in single combat two or three men; then marry, and engender58 two or three children; and the world will neither have gained nor lost by you.” Of which strange counsel, Disancour was no otherwise the author than inasmuch as he had been an example, at least of the former 139 part, it being his fortune to have fought three or four gallant59 duels in his time.
Another anecdote60 of Lord Herbert shows in what consideration duellists were held by the fair sex. “All things being ready for the ball, and every one being in their place, and I myself next to the Queen, expecting when the dancers would come in, one knocked at the door somewhat louder than became, I thought, a very civil person; when he came in, I remember there was a sudden whisper amongst the ladies, saying, ‘C’est Monsieur Balaguy!’ Whereupon I also saw the ladies and gentlemen, one after another, invite him to sit near them; and, what is more, when one lady had his company a while, another would say, ‘You have enjoyed him long enough, I must have him now.’ At which bold civility of them, though I was astonished, yet it added to my wonder that his person could not be thought at most but ordinary handsome; his hair, which was cut very short, half grey; his doublet, but of sackcloth, cut to his skin; and his breeches only of plain grey cloth. Informing myself by some standers-by who he was, I was told that he was one of the gallantest men in the world, as having killed eight or nine men in single fight, and that for this reason the ladies made so much of him; it being the manner of all French women to cherish gallant 140 men, as thinking they could not make so much of any else with the safety of their honour.”
It appears, however, that, notwithstanding this reckless spirit of duelling that prevailed in France, Lord Herbert had found some difficulty in bringing various noblemen to the field; and the following account gives a fair picture of the times.
“It happened one day that a daughter of the Duchess de Ventadour, of about ten or eleven years of age, going one evening from the castle to walk in the meadows, myself, with divers61 French gentlemen, attended her and some gentlewomen that were with her. This young lady wearing a knot of riband on her head, a French cavalier took it suddenly and fastened it to his hatband: the young lady, offended, herewith demands her riband; but he refusing to restore it, the young lady, addressing herself to me, said, ‘Monsieur, I pray, get my riband from that gentleman.’ Hereupon, going towards him, I courteously62, with my hat in my hand, desired him to do me the honour that I might deliver the lady her riband or bouquet64 again; but he roughly answering me, ‘Do you think I will give it to you, when I have refused it to her?’ I replied, ‘Nay, then, sir, I will make you restore it by force!’ Whereupon, also, putting on my hat, and reaching at his, he to save himself ran away; and after a long course in the meadow, 141 finding that I had almost overtook him, he turned short, and, running to the young lady, was about to put the riband in her hand, when I, seizing upon his arm, said to the young lady, ‘It was I that gave it.’ ‘Pardon me,’ quoth she, ‘it is he that gives it me.’ I said then, ‘Madam, I will not contradict you; but, if he dare say that I did not constrain65 him to give it, I will fight with him.’ The French gentleman answered nothing thereunto for the present, and we conducted the lady again to the castle. The next day I desired Mr. Aurelian Townshend to tell the French cavalier that he must confess that I constrained66 him to restore the riband, or fight with me. But the gentleman, seeing him unwilling67 to accept of this challenge, went out from the place; whereupon, I following him, some of the gentlemen that belonged to the Constable68, taking notice hereof, acquainted him therewith, who, sending for the French cavalier, checked him well for his sauciness69 in taking the riband away from his grandchild, and afterwards bid him depart his house: and this was all I ever heard of the gentleman, with whom I proceeded in that manner, because I thought myself obliged thereunto by the oath taken when I was made Knight70 of the Bath.”
It seems that our hero was a very pugnacious71 defender72 of ladies’ top-knots and ribands, for he relates another quarrel of a similar nature, 142 in the case of a Scotch73 gentleman, “who, taking a riband in the like manner from Mrs. Middleton, a maid of honour, in a back-room behind Queen Anne’s lodging74 in Greenwich, she likewise desired me to get her the said riband. I repaired, as formerly75, to him in a courteous63 manner to demand it; but he refusing, as the French cavalier did, I caught him by the neck, and had almost thrown him down, when company came in and parted us. I offered, likewise, to fight with this gentleman, and came to the place appointed, by Hyde Park; but this also was interrupted, by order of the Lords of the Council, and I never heard more of it.”
His lordship, notwithstanding his constant quarrels, which he most decidedly sought for, by his own account, asserts “that, although I lived in the armies and courts of the greatest princes in Christendom, yet I never had a quarrel with man for mine own sake; so that, although in mine own nature I was ever choleric76 and hasty, yet I never, without occasion given, quarrelled with anybody: for my friends often have I hazarded myself, but never yet drew my sword for my own sake singly.”
It is difficult to reconcile this assertion with a quarrel he picked with the same Balaguy, so much renowned77 amongst the ladies, of whom he had already spoken. “I remembered myself,” he says, “of the bravado79 of M. Balaguy, and, 143 coming to him, told him that I knew how brave a man he was, and that, as he had put me to one trial of daring when I was last with him in the trenches80, I would put him to another; and saying that I had heard he had a fair mistress, and that the scarf he wore was her gift, I would maintain I had a worthier81 mistress than he, and that I would do as much for her sake as he, or any one else, durst do for his.”
Balaguy very wisely declined the meeting, with a joke of somewhat an indelicate nature: to which Lord Herbert replied, “that he spoke78 more like a paillard than a cavalier!” And here, strange to say, the matter ended. To doubt the courage of Balaguy, is out of the question; and it is but reasonable to infer that Lord Herbert was looked upon in the court of France as a crackbrained knight-errant. In the case of the young lady’s top-knot, there is little doubt but that the French cavalier was her favourite, whom in a pettish82 moment she sought to embroil83 with our hero; and the Frenchman very wisely considered the whole business a childish joke.
The Quixotic character of Lord Herbert was fully84 illustrated85 after the siege of Rees, when a trumpeter came from the Spanish army with a challenge from a Spanish cavalier, purporting87, that if any cavalier would fight a single combat for the sake of his mistress, the said Spaniard 144 would meet him upon the assurance of a field. His lordship was the only madman found to accept the defiance88; and on this occasion received from the Prince of Orange a very salutary piece of advice. “His Excellency thereupon,” he says, “looking earnestly upon me, told me he was an old soldier, and that he had observed two sorts of men who used to send challenges of this kind: one of them, who, having lost perchance some part of their honour in the field before the enemy, would recover it again by a single fight; the other was of those who sent it only to discover whether our army had in it men affected89 to give trial of themselves in this kind. Howbeit, if this man was a person without exception to be taken against him, he said, there was none he knew upon whom he would sooner venture the honour of his army than myself. Hereupon, by his Excellency’s permission, I sent a trumpet86 to the Spanish army, when another trumpet came to me from Spinola, saying, the challenge was made without his consent, and that therefore he would not permit it.” This did not satisfy our knight; but he forthwith repaired to the Spanish camp to seek out the challenger. There he was received with great cordiality by Spinola; and, instead of a battle, the visit ended in a festive90 dinner, during which a conversation took place between his lordship and the Spanish general, descriptive of 145 the times. “Di che moriva Signor Francesco Vere?” To which Lord Herbert replied, “Per aver91 niente a fare.” When Spinola observed, “E basta per un generale.” Lord Herbert adds, “Indeed, that brave commander, Sir Francis Vere, died, not in time of war, but in peace.” He then parted from his noble host, with a particular request to be allowed to fight the infidels if ever he undertook a crusade, when he would be the first man who died in the quarrel.
It appears, however, that on one occasion a Frenchman, the favourite Luynes, showed less of spirit than our countryman. Through some misrepresentations Lord Herbert was recalled, and Luynes procured92 his brother the Duke of Chaun, with a train of officers, “each of whom had killed his man,” to go to England as ambassador extraordinary to complain of the conduct of Lord Herbert. The inquiry93 terminated in his favour, when he fell upon his knees before King James, in presence of the Duke of Buckingham, to request that a trumpeter, if not a herald94, might be sent to Luynes to tell him that he had made a false relation of the whole affair, and that he demanded satisfaction sword in hand. The King answered, “that he would take it into consideration.” But Luynes soon after died, and Herbert was again sent to France.
It may be easily imagined that Richelieu would not allow these edicts, apparently95 humane96, 146 to put an end to a practice which was both directly and indirectly97 of material service to his lofty ambition; and when he could not bring to the scaffold illustrious victims, such as the Cinque-Mars, De Thous, and Montmorency, he sought for guilt98, real or supposed, amongst those nobles who had infringed99 these useless laws. Thus we find, in 1626, the young Prince de Chalais, of the house of Talleyrand, killing100 in a duel the Count of Pont Gibaut, grandson of Schomberg. He was immediately apprehended101; but being a favourite of Gaston d’Orleans the King’s brother, and moreover the lover of the famous Duchess de Chevreuse, the cardinal was for the time deprived of his victim, until the year 1626, when he was accused of a conspiracy against his sovereign, sentenced to death, and executed the same day. This judicial102 murder was attended with circumstances of a most cruel nature. No executioner could be found to carry the sentence into effect, when two malefactors were pardoned on condition that they would perform the hateful duty; which they executed in so fearful a manner, that the unfortunate young nobleman received thirty blows of the axe103 ere his head was severed104 from the body.
The following year, history records another merciless act of the cardinal. Fran?ois de Montmorency, better known under the name 147 of Boutteville, was one of the most renowned duellists of the day. This nobleman, whenever he heard that a person bore the reputation of a courageous105 man, was in the practice of walking up to him, and quietly saying, “I understand, sir, that you are courageous; I wish to enable you to prove it,—what are your weapons?” Every morning the hall of his hotel was crowded with what was called the “golden youth of France,” where fencing and trials of skill at all arms were practised, and a sumptuous106 collation107 laid out for the company. The excesses of these desperadoes were so reckless, that a special edict appeared to keep them within limits. Such was the audacity108 of Boutteville, that he actually compelled the Count of Pont Gibaut on an Easter Sunday to quit his devotions and fight him: he was also denounced for having killed the Marquis de Portes and the Count de Thorigny. Shortly after, fighting the Baron de la Frette, in which duel his second was killed, he was obliged to absent himself from Paris: he fixed109 upon Brussels to meet another adversary, the Marquis de Beuvron, a relation of Thorigny, whose death he was anxious to avenge. The King, upon hearing of this determination, wrote immediately to the Archduchess, who then governed the Low Countries, to prevent this meeting; and directed the Marquis de Spinola to settle their differences. For 148 this purpose, this nobleman invited them both to a splendid repast, and made them embrace each other, with vows110 of everlasting111 friendship, and a total forgiveness of all past injuries, in the presence of a numerous company. Notwithstanding these solemn protestations, De Beuvron, on quitting the house, whispered to Boutteville, “that he never would rest satisfied until he had met him sword in hand.” Boutteville however refused to meet him, on the plea of the solemn promise he had made the Archduchess to abstain112 from any hostile act while on her territory; but he entreated113 that princess to write to Louis XIII, to obtain the King’s permission to return to France: to which application the monarch replied, “that all that he could do, for the love he bore her, was to allow him to remain in France without further prosecution, but he could not permit him to make his appearance at court.”
Beuvron returned to Paris, wrote no less than eight letters to Boutteville to request him to meet him there, and on his arrival proposed a duel without seconds: to which Boutteville replied, “that he would have had no objection to this arrangement, had not two of his friends expressed a wish to join the party; and that he should have to give them satisfaction if they were, disappointed.” The following day, the 12th of May, was fixed for the meeting, at three in 149 the afternoon, on the Place Royale, one of the most public places in the capital; Boutteville declaring that “he would fight under sunshine,” and following, in this remark, the example of the celebrated duellist56 De Bussy, who, being challenged to fight by night, replied, “that he would not condescend114 to display his valour to the stars, or even to the moon, since they were not able to contemplate115 him properly, or appreciate his skill; the obscurity of night being only fit to screen deeds of darkness:” he further advised the parties to bring two pioneers with them to dig their graves. It appears that strange notions prevailed on such occasions; and Brant?me relates the case of a gentleman who invited another to fight him on a winter’s night in their shirts; to which he sent answer, “that he would not expose himself to catch a cold, or a purging116, which he dreaded117 more than his antagonist’s valour.”
Howbeit, our champions met, with their four seconds; one of whom left his sick bed for the purpose. The combat began with sword and dagger4, when, casting the former weapon away, the principals collared each other, and fought with their daggers; which both holding at each other’s throat, they mutually asked for quarter. In the mean time, one of the seconds, the celebrated Bussy D’Amboise, had been run through the throat by a mortal thrust; and another second, 150 La Berthe, was also put hors de combat. The principals very quietly went to lunch at a barber’s shop; and, after seeing La Berthe’s wounds dressed, rode out of Paris. Bussy had just time to cross himself, and die in the arms of a worthy friar.
The fugitives118, who were quietly quitting the kingdom, were recognised by the emissaries of the sister of the deceased Bussy: Boutteville was arrested, after having eaten a hearty119 supper, and retired120 to rest; he was carried to the Bastille. On the 21st, being condemned121 to death, he was executed the following day on the Place de Grève with great military pomp, attended by the Bishop34 of Nantes: he was as anxious to preserve his mustachoes as Sir Thomas More was to put his beard out of the way of the executioner’s axe; when the worthy prelate observed, “Oh! my son, you must no longer dwell on worldly matters! Do you still think of life?” “I only think of my mustachoes!—the very finest in France,” replied the penitent122.
![](../../../skin/default/image/4.jpg)
点击
收听单词发音
![收听单词发音](/template/default/tingnovel/images/play.gif)
1
reign
![]() |
|
n.统治时期,统治,支配,盛行;v.占优势 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2
monarch
![]() |
|
n.帝王,君主,最高统治者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3
daggers
![]() |
|
匕首,短剑( dagger的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4
dagger
![]() |
|
n.匕首,短剑,剑号 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5
remarkable
![]() |
|
adj.显著的,异常的,非凡的,值得注意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6
tragic
![]() |
|
adj.悲剧的,悲剧性的,悲惨的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7
baron
![]() |
|
n.男爵;(商业界等)巨头,大王 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8
guise
![]() |
|
n.外表,伪装的姿态 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9
rue
![]() |
|
n.懊悔,芸香,后悔;v.后悔,悲伤,懊悔 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10
assassinated
![]() |
|
v.暗杀( assassinate的过去式和过去分词 );中伤;诋毁;破坏 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11
aged
![]() |
|
adj.年老的,陈年的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12
antagonist
![]() |
|
n.敌人,对抗者,对手 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13
adversary
![]() |
|
adj.敌手,对手 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14
determined
![]() |
|
adj.坚定的;有决心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15
avenge
![]() |
|
v.为...复仇,为...报仇 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16
par
![]() |
|
n.标准,票面价值,平均数量;adj.票面的,平常的,标准的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17
asylum
![]() |
|
n.避难所,庇护所,避难 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18
prosecution
![]() |
|
n.起诉,告发,检举,执行,经营 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19
squire
![]() |
|
n.护卫, 侍从, 乡绅 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20
entreat
![]() |
|
v.恳求,恳请 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21
resentment
![]() |
|
n.怨愤,忿恨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22
esteem
![]() |
|
n.尊敬,尊重;vt.尊重,敬重;把…看作 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23
duel
![]() |
|
n./v.决斗;(双方的)斗争 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24
banished
![]() |
|
v.放逐,驱逐( banish的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25
celebrated
![]() |
|
adj.有名的,声誉卓著的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26
amorous
![]() |
|
adj.多情的;有关爱情的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27
chivalric
![]() |
|
有武士气概的,有武士风范的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28
accomplice
![]() |
|
n.从犯,帮凶,同谋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29
conspiracy
![]() |
|
n.阴谋,密谋,共谋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30
carousel
![]() |
|
n.旋转式行李输送带 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31
previously
![]() |
|
adv.以前,先前(地) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32
massacre
![]() |
|
n.残杀,大屠杀;v.残杀,集体屠杀 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33
cardinal
![]() |
|
n.(天主教的)红衣主教;adj.首要的,基本的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34
bishop
![]() |
|
n.主教,(国际象棋)象 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35
worthy
![]() |
|
adj.(of)值得的,配得上的;有价值的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36
scion
![]() |
|
n.嫩芽,子孙 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37
doffing
![]() |
|
n.下筒,落纱v.脱去,(尤指)脱帽( doff的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38
canonical
![]() |
|
n.权威的;典型的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39
militant
![]() |
|
adj.激进的,好斗的;n.激进分子,斗士 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40
lawsuit
![]() |
|
n.诉讼,控诉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41
duels
![]() |
|
n.两男子的决斗( duel的名词复数 );竞争,斗争 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42
supplication
![]() |
|
n.恳求,祈愿,哀求 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43
majesty
![]() |
|
n.雄伟,壮丽,庄严,威严;最高权威,王权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44
dominions
![]() |
|
统治权( dominion的名词复数 ); 领土; 疆土; 版图 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45
impeached
![]() |
|
v.控告(某人)犯罪( impeach的过去式和过去分词 );弹劾;对(某事物)怀疑;提出异议 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46
vindicate
![]() |
|
v.为…辩护或辩解,辩明;证明…正确 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47
forfeit
![]() |
|
vt.丧失;n.罚金,罚款,没收物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48
pretence
![]() |
|
n.假装,作假;借口,口实;虚伪;虚饰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49
behold
![]() |
|
v.看,注视,看到 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50
dictates
![]() |
|
n.命令,规定,要求( dictate的名词复数 )v.大声讲或读( dictate的第三人称单数 );口授;支配;摆布 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51
imploring
![]() |
|
恳求的,哀求的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52
lawsuits
![]() |
|
n.诉讼( lawsuit的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53
solicitation
![]() |
|
n.诱惑;揽货;恳切地要求;游说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54
predecessor
![]() |
|
n.前辈,前任 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55
exemption
![]() |
|
n.豁免,免税额,免除 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56
duellist
![]() |
|
n.决斗者;[体]重剑运动员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57
entreaties
![]() |
|
n.恳求,乞求( entreaty的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58
engender
![]() |
|
v.产生,引起 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59
gallant
![]() |
|
adj.英勇的,豪侠的;(向女人)献殷勤的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60
anecdote
![]() |
|
n.轶事,趣闻,短故事 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61
divers
![]() |
|
adj.不同的;种种的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62
courteously
![]() |
|
adv.有礼貌地,亲切地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63
courteous
![]() |
|
adj.彬彬有礼的,客气的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64
bouquet
![]() |
|
n.花束,酒香 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65
constrain
![]() |
|
vt.限制,约束;克制,抑制 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
66
constrained
![]() |
|
adj.束缚的,节制的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
67
unwilling
![]() |
|
adj.不情愿的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
68
constable
![]() |
|
n.(英国)警察,警官 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
69
sauciness
![]() |
|
n.傲慢,鲁莽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
70
knight
![]() |
|
n.骑士,武士;爵士 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
71
pugnacious
![]() |
|
adj.好斗的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
72
defender
![]() |
|
n.保卫者,拥护者,辩护人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
73
scotch
![]() |
|
n.伤口,刻痕;苏格兰威士忌酒;v.粉碎,消灭,阻止;adj.苏格兰(人)的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
74
lodging
![]() |
|
n.寄宿,住所;(大学生的)校外宿舍 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
75
formerly
![]() |
|
adv.从前,以前 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
76
choleric
![]() |
|
adj.易怒的,性情暴躁的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
77
renowned
![]() |
|
adj.著名的,有名望的,声誉鹊起的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
78
spoke
![]() |
|
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
79
bravado
![]() |
|
n.虚张声势,故作勇敢,逞能 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
80
trenches
![]() |
|
深沟,地沟( trench的名词复数 ); 战壕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
81
worthier
![]() |
|
应得某事物( worthy的比较级 ); 值得做某事; 可尊敬的; 有(某人或事物)的典型特征 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
82
pettish
![]() |
|
adj.易怒的,使性子的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
83
embroil
![]() |
|
vt.拖累;牵连;使复杂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
84
fully
![]() |
|
adv.完全地,全部地,彻底地;充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
85
illustrated
![]() |
|
adj. 有插图的,列举的 动词illustrate的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
86
trumpet
![]() |
|
n.喇叭,喇叭声;v.吹喇叭,吹嘘 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
87
purporting
![]() |
|
v.声称是…,(装得)像是…的样子( purport的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
88
defiance
![]() |
|
n.挑战,挑衅,蔑视,违抗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
89
affected
![]() |
|
adj.不自然的,假装的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
90
festive
![]() |
|
adj.欢宴的,节日的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
91
aver
![]() |
|
v.极力声明;断言;确证 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
92
procured
![]() |
|
v.(努力)取得, (设法)获得( procure的过去式和过去分词 );拉皮条 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
93
inquiry
![]() |
|
n.打听,询问,调查,查问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
94
herald
![]() |
|
vt.预示...的来临,预告,宣布,欢迎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
95
apparently
![]() |
|
adv.显然地;表面上,似乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
96
humane
![]() |
|
adj.人道的,富有同情心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
97
indirectly
![]() |
|
adv.间接地,不直接了当地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
98
guilt
![]() |
|
n.犯罪;内疚;过失,罪责 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
99
infringed
![]() |
|
v.违反(规章等)( infringe的过去式和过去分词 );侵犯(某人的权利);侵害(某人的自由、权益等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
100
killing
![]() |
|
n.巨额利润;突然赚大钱,发大财 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
101
apprehended
![]() |
|
逮捕,拘押( apprehend的过去式和过去分词 ); 理解 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
102
judicial
![]() |
|
adj.司法的,法庭的,审判的,明断的,公正的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
103
axe
![]() |
|
n.斧子;v.用斧头砍,削减 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
104
severed
![]() |
|
v.切断,断绝( sever的过去式和过去分词 );断,裂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
105
courageous
![]() |
|
adj.勇敢的,有胆量的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
106
sumptuous
![]() |
|
adj.豪华的,奢侈的,华丽的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
107
collation
![]() |
|
n.便餐;整理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
108
audacity
![]() |
|
n.大胆,卤莽,无礼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
109
fixed
![]() |
|
adj.固定的,不变的,准备好的;(计算机)固定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
110
vows
![]() |
|
誓言( vow的名词复数 ); 郑重宣布,许愿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
111
everlasting
![]() |
|
adj.永恒的,持久的,无止境的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
112
abstain
![]() |
|
v.自制,戒绝,弃权,避免 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
113
entreated
![]() |
|
恳求,乞求( entreat的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
114
condescend
![]() |
|
v.俯就,屈尊;堕落,丢丑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
115
contemplate
![]() |
|
vt.盘算,计议;周密考虑;注视,凝视 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
116
purging
![]() |
|
清洗; 清除; 净化; 洗炉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
117
dreaded
![]() |
|
adj.令人畏惧的;害怕的v.害怕,恐惧,担心( dread的过去式和过去分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
118
fugitives
![]() |
|
n.亡命者,逃命者( fugitive的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
119
hearty
![]() |
|
adj.热情友好的;衷心的;尽情的,纵情的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
120
retired
![]() |
|
adj.隐退的,退休的,退役的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
121
condemned
![]() |
|
adj. 被责难的, 被宣告有罪的 动词condemn的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
122
penitent
![]() |
|
adj.后悔的;n.后悔者;忏悔者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |