All the realities of this war are things of the mind. This is a conflict of cultures, and nothing else in the world. All the world-wide pain and weariness, fear and anxieties, the bloodshed and destruction, the innumerable torn bodies of men and horses, the stench of putrefaction1, the misery2 of hundreds of millions of human beings, the waste of mankind, are but the material consequences of a false philosophy and foolish thinking. We fight not to destroy a nation, but a nest of evil ideas.
We fight because a whole nation has become obsessed3 by pride, by the cant4 of cynicism and the vanity of violence, by the evil suggestion of such third-rate writers as Gobineau and Stewart Chamberlain that they were a people of peculiar5 excellence6 destined7 to dominate the earth, by the base offer of advantage in cunning and treachery held out by such men as Delbruck and Bernhardi, by the theatricalism8 of the Kaiser, and by two stirring songs about Deutschland and the Rhine. These things, interweaving with the tradesmen’s activities of the armaments trust and the common vanity and 98weaknesses of unthinking men, have been sufficient to release disaster—we do not begin to measure the magnitude of the disaster. On the back of it all, spurring it on, are the idea-mongers, the base-spirited writing men, pretentious9 little professors in frock coats, scribbling10 colonels. They are the idea. They pointed11 the way and whispered “Go!” They ride the world now to catastrophe12. It is as if God in a moment of wild humour had lent his whirlwinds for an outing to half-a-dozen fleas13.
And the real task before mankind is quite beyond the business of the fighting line, the simple awful business of discrediting14 and discouraging these stupidities by battleship, artillery15, rifle and the blood and courage of seven million men. The real task of mankind is to get better sense into the heads of these Germans, and therewith and thereby16 into the heads of humanity generally, and to end not simply a war, but the idea of war. What printing and writing and talking have done, printing and writing and talking can undo17. Let no man be fooled by bulk and matter. Rifles do but kill men, and fresh men are born to follow them. Our business is to kill ideas. The ultimate purpose of this war is propaganda, the destruction of certain beliefs, and the creation of others. It is to this propaganda that reasonable men must address themselves.
And when I write propaganda, I do not for a moment mean the propaganda with which the name of 99Mr. Norman Angell is associated; this great modern gospel that war does not pay. That is indeed the only decent and attractive thing that can still be said for war. Nothing that is really worth having in life does pay. Men live in order that they may pay for the unpaying things. Love does not pay, art does not pay, happiness does not pay, honesty is not the best policy, generosity18 invites the ingratitude19 of the mean; what is the good of this huckster’s argument? It revolts all honourable20 men. But war, whether it pay or not, is an atrociously ugly thing, cruel, destroying countless21 beauties. Who cares whether war pays or does not pay, when one thinks of some obstinate22 Belgian peasant woman being interrogated23 and shot by a hectoring German officer, or of the weakly whimpering mess of some poor hovel with little children in it, struck by a shell? Even if war paid twelve-and-a-half per cent. per annum for ever on every pound it cost to wage, would it be any the less a sickening abomination to every decent soul? And, moreover, it is a bore. It is an unendurable bore. War and the preparation for war, the taxes, the drilling, the interference with every free activity, the arrest and stiffening24 up of life, the obedience25 to third-rate people in uniform, of which Berlin-struck Germans have been the implacable exponents26, have become an unbearable27 nuisance to all humanity. Neither Belgium nor France nor Britain is fighting now for 100glory or advantage. I do not believe Russia is doing so; we are all, I believe, fighting in a fury of resentment28 because at last after years of waste and worry to prevent it, we have been obliged to do so. Our grievance29 is the grievance of every decent life-loving German, of every German mother and sweetheart who watched her man go off under his incompetent30 leaders to hardship and mutilations and death. And our propaganda against the Prussian idea has to be no vile31 argument to the pocket, but an appeal to the common sense and common feeling of humanity. We have to clear the heads of the Germans, and keep the heads of our own people clear about this war. Particularly is there need to dissuade32 our people against the dream of profit-filching, the “War against German Trade.” We have to reiterate33 over and over again that we fight, resolved that at the end no nationality shall oppress any nationality or language again in Europe for ever, and by way of illustration, we want not those ingenious arrangements of figures that touch the Angell imagination, but photographs of the Kaiser in his glory at a review, and photographs of the long, unintelligent side-long face of the Crown Prince, his son, photographs of that great original Krupp taking his pleasures at Capri and, to set beside these, photographs pitilessly showing men killed and horribly torn upon the battlefield, and men crippled and women and men murdered, and homes burnt and, to 101the verge34 of indecency, all the peculiar filthiness35 of war. And the case that has thus to be stated has to be brought before the minds of the Germans, of Americans, of French people, and English people, of Swedes and Russians and Italians as our common evil, which, though it be at the expense of several Governments, we have to end.
Now, how is this literature to be spread! How are we to reach the common people of the Western European countries with these explanations, these assurances, these suggestions that are necessary for the proper ending of this war? I could wish we had a Government capable of something more articulate than “Wait and see!” a Government that dared confess a national intention to all the world. For what a Government says is audible to all the world. King George, too, has the ear of a thousand million people. If he saw fit to say simply and clearly what it is we fight for and what we seek, his voice would be heard universally, through Germany, through all America. No other voice has such penetration36. He is, he has told us, watching the war with interest, but that is not enough; we could have guessed that, knowing his spirit. As a nation, we need expression that shall reach the other side. But our Government is, I fear, one of those that obey necessity; it is only very reluctantly creative; it rests, therefore, with us who, outside all formal government, represent the national will and 102intention, to take this work into our hands. By means of a propaganda of books, newspaper articles, leaflets, tracts37 in English, French, German, Dutch, Swedish, Norwegian, Italian, Chinese and Japanese we have to spread this idea, repeat this idea, and impose upon this war the idea that this war must end war. We have to create a wide common conception of a re-mapped and pacified38 Europe, released from the abominable39 dangers of a private trade in armaments, largely disarmed40 and pledged to mutual41 protection. This conception has sprung up in a number of minds, and there have been proposals at once most extraordinary and feasible for its realisation, projects of aeroplanes scattering42 leaflets across Germany, of armies distributing tracts as they advance, of prisoners of war much afflicted43 by such literature. These ideas have the absurdity44 of novelty, but otherwise they are by no means absurd. They will strike many soldiers as being indecent, but the world is in revolt against the standards of soldiering.
Never before has the world seen clearly as it now sees clearly, the r?le of thought in the making of war. This new conception carries with it the corollary of an entirely45 new campaign.
How can we get at the minds of our enemies? How can we make explanation more powerful than armies and fleets? Failing an articulate voice at the head of our country, we must needs look for the 103resonating appeal we need in other quarters. We look to the Church that takes for its purposes the name of the Prince of Peace. In England, except for the smallest, meekest46 protest against war, any sort of war, on the part of a handful of Quakers, Christianity is silent. Its universally present organisation48 speaks no coherent counsels. Its workers for the most part are buried in the loyal manufacture of flannel49 garments and an inordinate50 quantity of bed-socks for the wounded. It is an extraordinary thing to go now and look at one’s parish church and note the pulpit, the orderly arrangements for the hearers, the proclamations on the doors, to sit awhile on the stone wall about the graves and survey the comfortable vicarage, and to reflect that this is just the local representation of a universally present organisation for the communication of ideas; that all over Europe there are such pulpits, such possibilities of gathering51 and saying, and that it gathers nothing and has nothing to say. Pacific, patriotic52 sentiment it utters perhaps, but nothing that anyone can act upon, nothing to draw together, will, and make an end. It is strange to sit alive in the sunshine and realise that, and to think of how tragically53 that same realisation came to another mind in Europe.
Several things have happened during the past few weeks with the intensest symbolical54 quality; the murder of Jaurès, for example; but surely nothing has 104occurred so wonderful and touching55 as the death of the Pope, that faithful, honest, simple old man. The war and the perplexity of the war darkened his last hours. “Once the Church could have stopped this thing,” he said, with a sense of threads missed and controls that have slipped away—it may be with a sense of vivifying help discouraged and refused. The Tribuna tells a story that, if not true, is marvellously invented, of the Austrian representative coming to ask him for a blessing56 on the Austrian arms. He feigned57 not to hear, or perhaps he did not hear. The Austrian asked again, and again there was silence. Then, at the third request, when he could be silent no longer, he broke out: “No! Bless peace!” As the temperature of his weary body rose, his last clear moments were spent in attempts to word telegrams that should have some arresting hold upon the gigantic crash that was coming, and in his last delirium58 he lamented59 war and the impotence of the Church....
Intellect without faith is the devil, but faith without intellect is a negligent60 angel with rusty61 weapons. This European catastrophe is the tragedy of the weak though righteous Christian47 will. We begin to see that to be right and indolent, or right and scornfully silent, or right and abstinent62 from the conflict is to be wrong. Righteousness has need to be as clear and efficient and to do things as sedulously63 in the right way as any evil doer. There is 105no meaning in the Christianity of a Christian who is not now a propagandist for peace—who is not now also a politician. There is no faith in the Liberalism that merely carps at the manner of our entanglement64 in a struggle that must alter all the world for ever. We need not only to call for peace, but to seek and show and organise65 the way of peace....
One thinks of Governments and the Church and the Press, and then, turning about for some other source of mental control, we recall the organisations, the really quite opulent organisations, that are professedly devoted66 to the promotion67 of peace. There is no voice from The Hague. The so-called peace movement in our world has consumed money enough and service enough to be something better than a weak little grumble68 at the existence of war. What is this movement and its organisations doing now? Ninety-nine people in Europe out of every hundred are complaining of war now. It needs no specially69 endowed committees to do that. They preach to a converted world. The question is how to end it and prevent its recurrence70. But have these specially peace-seeking people ever sought for the secret springs of war, or looked into the powers that war for war, or troubled to learn how to grasp war and subdue71 it? All Germany is knit by the fighting spirit, and armed beyond the rest of the world. Until the mind of Germany is changed, 106there can be no safe peace on earth. But that, it seems, does not trouble the professional peace advocate if only he may cry Peace, and live somewhere in comfort, and with the comfortable sense of a superior dissent72 from the general emotion.
How are we to gather together the wills and understanding of men for the tremendous necessities and opportunities of this time? Thought, speech, persuasion73, an incessant74 appeal for clear intentions, clear statements for the dispelling75 of suspicion and the abandonment of secrecy76 and trickery; there is work for every man who writes or talks and has the slightest influence upon another creature. This monstrous77 conflict in Europe, the slaughtering78, the famine, the confusion, the panic and hatred79 and lying pride, it is all of it real only in the darkness of the mind. At the coming of understanding it will vanish as dreams vanish at awakening80. But never will it vanish until understanding has come. It goes on only because we, who are voices, who suggest, who might elucidate81 and inspire, are ourselves such little scattered82 creatures that though we strain to the breaking point, we still have no strength to turn on the light that would save us. There have been moments in the last three weeks when life has been a waking nightmare, one of those frozen nightmares when, with salvation83 within one’s reach, one cannot move, and the voice dies in one’s throat.
The End
点击收听单词发音
1 putrefaction | |
n.腐坏,腐败 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 misery | |
n.痛苦,苦恼,苦难;悲惨的境遇,贫苦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 obsessed | |
adj.心神不宁的,鬼迷心窍的,沉迷的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 cant | |
n.斜穿,黑话,猛扔 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 peculiar | |
adj.古怪的,异常的;特殊的,特有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 excellence | |
n.优秀,杰出,(pl.)优点,美德 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 destined | |
adj.命中注定的;(for)以…为目的地的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 theatricalism | |
n.演出法,戏剧风格 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 pretentious | |
adj.自命不凡的,自负的,炫耀的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 scribbling | |
n.乱涂[写]胡[乱]写的文章[作品]v.潦草的书写( scribble的现在分词 );乱画;草草地写;匆匆记下 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 pointed | |
adj.尖的,直截了当的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 catastrophe | |
n.大灾难,大祸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 fleas | |
n.跳蚤( flea的名词复数 );爱财如命;没好气地(拒绝某人的要求) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 discrediting | |
使不相信( discredit的现在分词 ); 使怀疑; 败坏…的名声; 拒绝相信 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 artillery | |
n.(军)火炮,大炮;炮兵(部队) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 thereby | |
adv.因此,从而 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 undo | |
vt.解开,松开;取消,撤销 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 generosity | |
n.大度,慷慨,慷慨的行为 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 ingratitude | |
n.忘恩负义 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 honourable | |
adj.可敬的;荣誉的,光荣的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 countless | |
adj.无数的,多得不计其数的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 obstinate | |
adj.顽固的,倔强的,不易屈服的,较难治愈的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 interrogated | |
v.询问( interrogate的过去式和过去分词 );审问;(在计算机或其他机器上)查询 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 stiffening | |
n. (使衣服等)变硬的材料, 硬化 动词stiffen的现在分词形式 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 obedience | |
n.服从,顺从 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 exponents | |
n.倡导者( exponent的名词复数 );说明者;指数;能手 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 unbearable | |
adj.不能容忍的;忍受不住的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 resentment | |
n.怨愤,忿恨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 grievance | |
n.怨愤,气恼,委屈 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 incompetent | |
adj.无能力的,不能胜任的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 vile | |
adj.卑鄙的,可耻的,邪恶的;坏透的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 dissuade | |
v.劝阻,阻止 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 reiterate | |
v.重申,反复地说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 verge | |
n.边,边缘;v.接近,濒临 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 filthiness | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 penetration | |
n.穿透,穿人,渗透 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 tracts | |
大片土地( tract的名词复数 ); 地带; (体内的)道; (尤指宣扬宗教、伦理或政治的)短文 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 pacified | |
使(某人)安静( pacify的过去式和过去分词 ); 息怒; 抚慰; 在(有战争的地区、国家等)实现和平 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 abominable | |
adj.可厌的,令人憎恶的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 disarmed | |
v.裁军( disarm的过去式和过去分词 );使息怒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 mutual | |
adj.相互的,彼此的;共同的,共有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 scattering | |
n.[物]散射;散乱,分散;在媒介质中的散播adj.散乱的;分散在不同范围的;广泛扩散的;(选票)数量分散的v.散射(scatter的ing形式);散布;驱散 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 afflicted | |
使受痛苦,折磨( afflict的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 absurdity | |
n.荒谬,愚蠢;谬论 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 meekest | |
adj.温顺的,驯服的( meek的最高级 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 Christian | |
adj.基督教徒的;n.基督教徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 organisation | |
n.组织,安排,团体,有机休 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 flannel | |
n.法兰绒;法兰绒衣服 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 inordinate | |
adj.无节制的;过度的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 gathering | |
n.集会,聚会,聚集 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 patriotic | |
adj.爱国的,有爱国心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 tragically | |
adv. 悲剧地,悲惨地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 symbolical | |
a.象征性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 touching | |
adj.动人的,使人感伤的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 blessing | |
n.祈神赐福;祷告;祝福,祝愿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 feigned | |
a.假装的,不真诚的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 delirium | |
n. 神智昏迷,说胡话;极度兴奋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 lamented | |
adj.被哀悼的,令人遗憾的v.(为…)哀悼,痛哭,悲伤( lament的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60 negligent | |
adj.疏忽的;玩忽的;粗心大意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61 rusty | |
adj.生锈的;锈色的;荒废了的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62 abstinent | |
adj.饮食有度的,有节制的,禁欲的;n.禁欲者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63 sedulously | |
ad.孜孜不倦地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64 entanglement | |
n.纠缠,牵累 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65 organise | |
vt.组织,安排,筹办 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
66 devoted | |
adj.忠诚的,忠实的,热心的,献身于...的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
67 promotion | |
n.提升,晋级;促销,宣传 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
68 grumble | |
vi.抱怨;咕哝;n.抱怨,牢骚;咕哝,隆隆声 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
69 specially | |
adv.特定地;特殊地;明确地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
70 recurrence | |
n.复发,反复,重现 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
71 subdue | |
vt.制服,使顺从,征服;抑制,克制 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
72 dissent | |
n./v.不同意,持异议 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
73 persuasion | |
n.劝说;说服;持有某种信仰的宗派 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
74 incessant | |
adj.不停的,连续的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
75 dispelling | |
v.驱散,赶跑( dispel的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
76 secrecy | |
n.秘密,保密,隐蔽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
77 monstrous | |
adj.巨大的;恐怖的;可耻的,丢脸的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
78 slaughtering | |
v.屠杀,杀戮,屠宰( slaughter的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
79 hatred | |
n.憎恶,憎恨,仇恨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
80 awakening | |
n.觉醒,醒悟 adj.觉醒中的;唤醒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
81 elucidate | |
v.阐明,说明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
82 scattered | |
adj.分散的,稀疏的;散步的;疏疏落落的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
83 salvation | |
n.(尤指基督)救世,超度,拯救,解困 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |