Chald?an chronology has within the last few years been brought into the domain7 of history, and carried back to a date almost, if not quite, as remote as that of Egypt. And this has been effected by a process identical in the two cases, the decipherment of an unknown language in inscriptions on ancient monuments. Until this discovery the little that was known of the early history of Chald?a was derived8 almost entirely9 from two sources: the Bible, and the fragments quoted by later writers from the lost work of Berosus. Berosus was a learned priest of Babylon, who lived about 300 b.c., shortly after the conquest of Alexander, and wrote in Greek a history of the country from the most ancient times, compiled from the annals preserved in the 43 temples, and from the oldest traditions. He began with a Cosmogony, fragments of which only are preserved, from which little could be inferred, except that it bore some general resemblance to that of Genesis, until the complete Chald?an Cosmogony was deciphered by Mr. George Smith from tablets in the British Museum. Then followed a mythical period of the reigns10 of ten gods or demi-gods, reigning12 for 432,000 years, in the middle of which period the divine fish-man, Ea-Han or Oannes, was said to have come up out of the Persian Gulf13, and taught mankind letters, sciences, laws, and all the arts of civilization; 259,000 years after Oannes, under Xisuthros (the Greek translation of Hasisastra), the last of the ten kings, a Deluge14 is said to have occurred; which is described in terms so similar to the narrative15 of Noah's deluge in Genesis, as to leave no doubt that they are different versions of the same legend.
Prior to the appearance of Oannes, Berosus relates, "that Chald?a had been colonized16 by a mixed multitude of men of foreign race, who lived without order like animals," thus carrying back the existence of mankind in large numbers, to some date anterior17 to 259,000 years before the Deluge. There is also a legend resembling that of the Tower of Babel and the confusion of languages, recorded in another fragment of Berosus. These accounts are all so obviously mythical that no historical value can be attached to them, and they have only been preserved because early Christian18 writers saw in them some sort of distorted confirmation19 of the corresponding narratives20 in the Old Testament21.
For anything like historical dates therefore the Bible remained the principal authority, until the recent 44 discoveries made from the monuments of Chald?a and Assyria. This authority does not carry us very far back. The first event which can advance any claim to be considered as historical, is that of the migration23 of Terah from Ur of the Chaldees to Haran, and the further migration of his son Abraham from Haran to Palestine. This is said to have taken place in the ninth generation after Noah, about 290 years after the Deluge, and it presupposes the existence of a dense24 population and a number of large cities both in Upper and Lower Mesopotamia. It mentions also an event, apparently25 historical, as occurring in Abraham's time, viz. a campaign by Chedorlaomer, King of Elam, with four allies, one of whom is a King of Shinar, against five petty kings in Southern Syria. Chedorlaomer has been identified from inscriptions with Khuder-lagomer, one of the kings of the Elamite dynasty, who conquered Chald?a about 2300 b.c., and were expelled before 2000 b.c.
A long interval26 then occurs during which the scattered27 notices in the Bible relate mainly to the intercourse28 of the Hebrews with Egypt, with the races of Canaan, with the Philistines29, with the Ph?nicians of Tyre, and with the Syrians of Damascus. Mesopotamia first appears after the rise of the Assyrian Empire had united nearly the whole of Western Asia under the warlike kings who reigned30 at Nineveh, and when Palestine had become the battle-field between them and the declining power of Egypt, which under the eighteenth and nineteenth Egyptian dynasties had extended to the Euphrates. The capture of Jerusalem in the reign11 of Rehoboam by Shishak, the first king of the twenty-second Egyptian dynasty, affords the first certain synchronism between sacred and profane31 history. The 45 date may be fixed32 within a few years at 970 b.c. Assyria first appears on the scene two hundred years later in the reign of Menahem King of Israel, when Pul, better known as Tiglath-Pileser II., came against the land, and exacted a large ransom33 from Menahem, whom he confirmed as a tributary34 vassal35.
From this time forward the succession of Assyrian kings is recorded more or less accurately36 in the Bible. Tiglath-Pileser accepted vassalage37 and a large tribute from Ahaz to come to his assistance against Rezin King of Syria, and Pekah King of Israel, who were besieging38 Jerusalem, and Tiglath-Pileser came to his aid and captured and sacked Damascus. Shalmaneser came up against Hoshea King of Judah, who submitted, but was deposed39 for intriguing40 with Egypt, and Shalmaneser then took Samaria and carried the ten tribes of Israel away into Assyria, placing them in the cities of the Medes. Sennacherib, in the fourteenth year of Hezekiah, took all the fenced cities of Judah, and his general, Rab-shakeh, besieged41 Jerusalem, which was saved by the repulse42 of the main army under the king when marching to invade Egypt. The murder of Sennacherib by his two sons and the succession of Esarhaddon are next mentioned.
Nineveh then disappears from the scene, and the great Babylonian conqueror43, Nebuchadnezzar, puts an end to the kingdom of Jud?a, by taking Jerusalem and carrying the people captive to Babylon. This historical retrospect45 carries us back a very short distance, and little can be gathered in the way of accurate chronology from the few vague references prior to this date. So stood the question until the date of Chald?an history and civilization was unexpectedly 46 carried back at least 3000 years by the discovery of its monuments.
When the first Assyrian sculptures were found by Botta and Layard not fifty years ago in the mounds47 of rubbish which covered the ruins of Nineveh, and brought home to Europe, it was seen that they were covered with inscriptions in an unknown character. It was called the cuneiform, because it was made up of combinations of a single sign, resembling a thin wedge or arrow-head. This sign was made in three fundamental ways, i.e. either horizontal [symbol], vertical48[symbol], or angular [symbol], and all the characters were made up of combinations of these primary forms, which were obviously produced by impressing a style with a triangular49 head on moist clay. They resembled, in fact, very much the strokes and dashes used in spelling out the words conveyed by the electric telegraph, in which letters are formed by oscillations of the needle.
This mode of writing had apparently been developed from picture-writing, for several, of the groups of characters bore an unmistakable resemblance to natural objects. In the very oldest inscriptions which have been discovered the writing, is hardly yet cuneiform, and the primitive50 pictorial51 character of the signs is apparent.
But the bulk of the cuneiform inscriptions not being pictorial, there could be little doubt that they were phonetic52, or represented sounds. The question was, what sounds these characters signified, and when translated into sounds, what words and what language did the groups of signs represent?
The first clue to these questions was, as in the parallel case of Egypt, afforded by a trilingual inscription. 47 The kings of the Persian Empire reigned over subjects of various races and languages. The three principal were the Persians, an Aryan race who spoke53 an inflectional language which has been preserved in old Persian and Zend; Semites, who spoke Aramaic, a language closely allied54 to Hebrew; and descendants of the older Accadian races, whose language was Turanian, or agglutinative.
It is almost the same at the present day in the same region, where edicts or inscriptions, to be readily intelligible55 to all classes of subjects, would require to be made in Persian, Arabic, and Turkish.
Accordingly, the pompous56 inscriptions and royal edicts of these ancient monarchs58 were frequently made in the three languages, and specimens59 of these were brought to Europe. The difficulty of deciphering them was, however, great, for the inscriptions were all written, though in different languages, in the same cuneiform characters, so that the aid afforded in the case of the Rosetta stone by a Greek translation of the hieroglyphic60 inscription was not forthcoming.
The ingenuity61 of a German scholar, Grotefend, furnished the first clue by discovering that certain groups of signs represented the names of known Persian kings, and thus identifying the component62 signs in the Persian inscription as letters of an alphabet.
A few years later Sir Henry Rawlinson copied, and succeeded in deciphering, a famous inscription engraved63 by the great Persian monarch57, Darius the first, high up in the face of a precipice64 forming the wall of a narrow defile65 at Behistan, and giving an historical record of the exploits of his reign. The clue thus afforded was rapidly followed up by a host of scholars, among whom 48 the names of Rawlinson, Burnouf, Lassen, and Oppert were most conspicuous66, and before long the text of inscriptions in Persian and Semitic could be read with great certainty. The task was one which required a vast amount of patience and ingenuity, for the cuneiform writing turned out to be one of great complexity67, Though phonetic in the main, the characters did not always represent the simple elements of sounds, or letters of an alphabet, but frequently syllables68 containing one or more consonants69 united by vowels70, and a considerable number were ideographic or conventional representations of ideas, like our numerals 1, 2, 3, which have no relation to spoken sounds.
Thus the simple vertical wedge [symbol] represented "man," and was prefixed to proper names of kings so as to show that the signs which followed denoted the name of a man; the sign [symbol] denoted country, and so on. The difficulties were, however, surmounted71, and inscriptions in the two known languages could be read with considerable certainty.
The third language, however, remained unknown until the finishing stroke to its decipherment was given by the discovery by Layard under the great mound46 of Koyunjik near Mosul on the Tigris, the site of the ancient Nineveh, of the royal palace of Asshurbanipal, or Sardanapalus, the grandson of Sennacherib, and one of the greatest Assyrian monarchs, who lived about 650 b.c. This palace contained a royal library like that of Alexandria or the British Museum, the contents of which had been carefully collected from the oldest records of previous libraries and temples, and almost miraculously73 preserved. The secret of the preservation74 of these Assyrian and Chald?an remains75, is that the 49 district contains no stone, and all the great buildings were constructed mainly of sun-dried bricks, and built on mounds or platforms of the same material to raise them above the alluvial76 plain. These, when the cities were deserted77, crumbled78 rapidly under the action of the air and rains, which are torrential at certain seasons, into shapeless rubbish heaps of fine dry dust and sand, under which everything of more durable79 material was securely buried.
So rapid was the process, that when Xenophon on the famous retreat of the ten thousand traversed the site of Nineveh only two hundred years after its destruction, he found nothing but the ruins of a deserted city, the very name and memory of which had been lost.
As regards the contents of the library the explanation of their perfect preservation is equally simple. The books were written, not on perishable80 paper or parchment, but on cylinders81 of clay. It is evident that the cuneiform characters were exceedingly well adapted for this description of writing, and probably originated from the nature of the material. A fine tenacious82 clay cost nothing, was readily moulded into cylinders, and when slightly moist was easily engraved by a tool or style stamping on it those wedge-like characters, so that when hardened by a slow fire the book was practically indestructible. So much so, indeed, that though the palace, including the library with its shelves and upper stories, had all fallen to the ground, and the book-cylinders lay scattered on the floor, they were mostly in a state of perfect preservation. Other similar finds have been made since, notably83 one of another great library of the priestly college at Erech, founded or enlarged as far back as 2000 b.c. by Sargon II. Among the books 50 thus preserved there are fortunately translations of old Accadian works into the more modern Aramaic or Assyrian, either interlined or in parallel columns, and, also grammars and dictionaries of the old language to assist in its study. It appears that as far back as 2000 years b.c. this old language had already become obsolete84, and was preserved as Latin or Vedic Sanscrit are at the present day, as the venerable language for religious uses, in which the earliest sacred books, historical annals, and astrological and magical formulas had been written. With these aids this ancient Accadian language can now be read with almost as much certainty as Egyptian hieroglyphics85, and the records written in it are accumulating rapidly with every fresh exploration. Some idea of the wealth of the materials already found may be formed from the fact that the number of tablets in the different museums of Europe from the Nineveh library alone exceeds 10,000. They present to us a most interesting picture of the religion, literature, laws, and social life of a period long antecedent to that commonly assigned for the destruction of the world by Noah's Deluge, or even to that of the creation of Adam. To some of these we shall have occasion subsequently to refer, but for the present I confine myself to the immediate86 object in view, that of verifying the earliest historical dates.
The first certain date is fixed by the annals of the Assyrian King Asshurbanipal, grandson of Sennacherib, who conquered Elam and destroyed its capital, Susa, in the year 645 b.c. The king says that he took away all the statues from the great temple of Susa, and among others, one of the Chald?an goddess Nana, which had been carried away from her own temple in the city of 51 Erech, by a king of Elam who conquered the land of Accad 1635 years before. This conquest, and the accession of an Elamite dynasty which lasted for nearly 300 years, is confirmed from a variety of other sources, and its date is thus fixed, beyond the possibility of a doubt, at 2280 b.c. A king of this dynasty, Khudur-Lagamar, synchronizes87 with Abraham, assuming Abraham and the narrative in the Old Testament respecting his defeat of that monarch to be historical.
This Elamite conquest of Chald?a is a memorable88 historical era, for it inaugurates the period of great wars and of the rise and fall of empires, which play such a conspicuous part in the subsequent annals of nations. Elam was a small province between the Kurdish mountains and the Tigris, extending to the Persian Gulf, and its capital, Susa, was an ancient and famous city; which afterwards became one of the principal seats of the Persian monarchs. The Elamites were originally a Turanian race like the Accads, and spoke a language which was a dialect of Accadian, but, as in Chald?a and Assyria, the kings and aristocracy appear to have been Semites from an early period. It was apparently an organized and civilized89 State, and the conquest was not a passing irruption of barbarians90, but the result of a campaign by regular troops, who founded a dynasty which lasted for more than 200 years. It evidently disturbed the equilibrium91 of Western Asia, and led to a succession of wars. The invasion of Egypt by the Hyksos followed closely on it. Then came the reaction which drove the Elamites from Chald?a and the Hyksos from Egypt. Then the great wars of the eighteenth Egyptian dynasty, which carried the arms of Ahmes and Thotmes to the Euphrates and Black Sea, and 52 established for a time the supremacy92 of Egypt over Western Asia. Then the rise of the Hittite Empire, which extended over Asia Minor93, and contended on equal terms with Ramses II. in Syria. Then the rise of the Assyrian Empire, which crushed the Hittites and all surrounding nations, and twice conquered and overran Egypt. Finally, the rise of the Medes, the fall of Nineveh, the short supremacy of Babylon, and the establishment of the great Persian Empire. From the Persian we pass to the Greek, and then to the Roman Empire, and find ourselves in full modern history. It may be fairly said, therefore, that modern history, with its series of great wars and revolutions, commences with this record of the Elamite conquest of Chald?a in 2280 b.c.
The next tolerably certain date is that of Ur-ea, and his son Dungi, two kings of the old Accadian race, who reigned at Ur over the united kingdoms of Sumir and Accad. They were great builders and restorers of temples, and have left numerous traces of their existence in the monuments both at Ur, and at Larsam, Sirgalla, Erech, and other ancient cities. Among other relics94 of these kings there is in the British Museum the signet-cylinder of Ur-ea himself, on which is engraved the Moon-God, the patron deity95 of Ur, with the king and priests worshipping him. The date of Ur-ea is ascertained96 as follows—Nabonidus, the last king of Babylon, 550 b.c., was a great restorer of the old temples, and, as Professor Sayce says, "a zealous97 antiquarian who busied himself much with the disinterment of the memorial cylinders which their founders99 and restorers had buried beneath their foundations." The results of his discoveries he recorded on special 53 cylinders for the information of posterity100, which have fortunately been preserved. Among others he restored the Sun-temple at Larsam, in which he found intact in its chamber101 under the corner-stone, a cylinder of King Hummurabi or Khammuragas, stating that the temple was commenced by Ur-ea and finished by his son Dungi, 700 years before his time. Hummurabi was a well-known historical king who expelled the Elamites, and made Babylon for the first time the capital of Chald?a, about 2000 b.c. The date of Ur-ea cannot therefore be far from 2700 b.c.
The same fortunate circumstance of the habit, by kings who built or restored famous temples, of laying the foundation-stone, such as our royal personages often do at the present day, and depositing under it, in a secure chamber, a cylinder recording102 the fact, has given us a still more ancient date, that of Sharrukin or Sargon I. of Agade. The same Nabonidus repaired the great Sun-temple of Sippar, and he says "that having dug deep in its foundations for the cylinders of the founder98, the Sun-god suffered him to behold103 the foundation cylinder of Naram-Sin, son of Sharrukin or (Sargon I.), which for three thousand and two hundred years none of the kings who lived before him had seen." This gives 3750 b.c. as the date of Naram-Sin, or, allowing for the long reign of Sargon I., about 3800 b.c. as the date of that monarch. This discovery revolutionized the accepted ideas of Chald?an chronology, and carried it back at one stroke 1000 years before the date of Ur-ea, making it contemporary with the fourth Egyptian dynasty who built the great Pyramids. The evidence is not so conclusive104 as in the case of Egypt, where the lists of Manetho give us the whole series of successive kings 54 and dynasties, a great majority of which are confirmed by contemporary records and monuments. The date of Sargon I. rests mainly on the authority of Nabonidus, who lived more than 3000 years later, and may have been mistaken, but he was in the best position to consult the oldest records, and had apparently no motive105 to make a wilful106 mis-statement. Moreover, other documents have been found in different places confirming the statement on the cylinder of Nabonidus, and the opinion of the best and latest authorities has come round to accept the date of about 3800 b.c. as authentic107. Professor Sayce, in his Hibbert Lecture in 1888, gives a detailed108 account of the evidence which had overcome his original scepticism, and forced him to admit the accuracy of this very distant date. Since the discovery of the cylinder of Nabonidus, several tablets have been found and deciphered, containing lists of kings and dynasties of the same character as the Egyptian lists of Manetho. One tablet of the kings who reigned at Babylon takes us back, reign by reign, to about 2400 b.c. Other tablets, though incomplete, give the names of at least sixty kings which are not found in this record of the Babylonian era, and who presumedly reigned during the interval of about 1400 years between Khammuragas and Sargon I. The names are mostly Accadian, and if they did not reign during this interval they must have preceded the foundation of a Semite dynasty by Sargon I., and thus extend the date of Chald?an history still further back. The probability of such a remote date is enhanced by the certainty that a high civilization existed in Egypt as long ago as 5000 b.c., and there is no apparent reason why it should not have existed in the valleys of the Tigris and Euphrates as soon as in that of the Nile.
55 Boscawen, in a paper read at the Victoria Institute in 1886, says that inscriptions found at Larsa, a neighbouring city to Ur of the Chaldees, show that from as early a period as 3750 b.c. a Semitic population existed in the latter city, speaking a language akin44 to Hebrew, carrying on trade and commerce, and with a religion which, although not Monotheist, had at the head of its pantheon a supreme109 god, Ilu or El, from whose name that of Elohim and Allah has been inherited as the name of God by the Hebrews and Arabs. The latest discoveries all point to the earliest dates, and some authorities think that genuine traces of the earliest Accadian civilization can be found as far back as 6000 b.c. There can be no doubt, moreover, that this Sharrukin or Sargon I. is a perfect historical personage. A statue of him has been found at Agade or Accad, and also his cylinder with an inscription on it giving his name and exploits. It begins, "Sharrukin the mighty110 king am I," and goes on to say, "that he knew not his father, but his mother was a royal princess, who to conceal111 his birth placed him in a basket of rushes closed with bitumen112, and cast him into the river, from which he was saved by Akki the water-carrier, who brought him up as his own child." It is singular how the same or a very similar story is told of Moses, Cyrus, and other heroes of antiquity113. It is probable from this that he was a military adventurer who rose to the throne; but there can be no doubt that he was a great monarch, who united the two provinces of Shumir and Accad, or of Lower and Upper Mesopotamia, into one kingdom, as Menes did the Upper and Lower Egypts, and extended his rule over some of the adjoining countries. He says "that he had reigned for forty-five 56 years, and governed the black-headed (Accadian) race. In multitudes of bronze chariots I rode over rugged114 lands. I governed the upper countries. Three times to the coast of the sea I advanced." If there is any truth in this inscription it would be very interesting as showing the existence in Western Asia of nations to be conquered in great campaigns, with a force of horse-chariots, at this remote period, 2000 years earlier than the campaigns of Ahmes and Thotmes recorded in the Egyptian monuments of the eighteenth dynasty.
CYLINDER SEAL OF SARGON I., FROM AGADE. (Hommel, "Gesch. Babyloniens u. Assyriens.")
The reality of these campaigns is moreover confirmed by inscriptions and images of this Sargon having been found in Cyprus and on the opposite coast of Syria, and by a Babylonian cylinder of his son Naram-Sin, found by Cesnola in the Cyprian temple of Kurion. In another direction he and his son carried their arms into the peninsula of Sinai, attracted doubtless by the copper115 and turquoise116 mines of Wady Maghera, which were worked by the Egyptians under the third dynasty. Sargon I. is also known to have been a great patron of literature, and to have founded the library of Agade, 57 which was long one of the most famous in Babylonia. A work on Astronomy and Astrology, in seventy-two books, which was so well known in the time of Berosus as to be translated by him into Greek, was also compiled for him.
Another king of the same name, known as Sargon II., who reigned about 2000 b.c., either founded or enlarged the library of the priestly college at Erech, which was one of the oldest and most famous cities of Lower Chald?a, and known as the "City of Books." It was also considered to be a sacred city, and its necropolis extends over a great part of the adjoining desert, and contains innumerable tombs and graves ranging over all periods of Chald?an and Assyrian history, up to an unknown antiquity.
The exact historical date of Sargon I. may be a little uncertain; but whatever its antiquity may be, it is evident that it is already far removed from the beginnings of Chald?an civilization. Sargon II. is perfectly117 historical, and his library and the state of the arts and literature in his reign prove this conclusively118. He states in his tablets that 350 kings had reigned before him, and in such a literary age he could hardly have made such a statement without some foundation. If anything like this number of kings had reigned before 2000 b.c., the date of Sargon II.'s Chald?an chronology would have to be extended to a date preceding that of Egypt. Moreover, Sargon was a Semite, who founded a powerful monarchy119 over a mixed population, consisting mainly of a primitive Accadian race, who had already built large cities and famous temples, written sacred books, and made considerable progress in literature, science, agriculture, and industrial arts. This primitive race was 58 neither Semitic nor Aryan, but Turanian. They spoke an agglutinative language, and resembled the Chinese very much both in physical type and in character. They were a short, thick-set people, with yellow skins, coarse black hair, and, judging from the ancient statues recently discovered, of decidedly Tartar or Mongolian features. They were, like the Chinese, a peaceable, patient, and industrious120 people, addicted121 to agriculture, and specially122 skilled in irrigation. They were educated and literary, but very superstitious123 in regard to ghosts, omens124, and evil spirits. This resemblance to the Chinese has been remarkably125 confirmed by the discovery made within the last few years, that the Accadian and Chinese languages are closely allied, and that a great many words are identical. The early prehistoric126 and astronomical legends were almost similar, and in some instances, as in the division of the year, the names and order of the planets, and the number and duration of the fabulous127 reigns of gods, so identical as to leave no doubt of their having had a common origin. But as the Chinese annals do not extend farther back than about 2700 b.c., the priority of invention must be assigned to the Accadians.
This Turanian population had been long settled in Mesopotamia before the accession of Sargon I., and before the supremacy of the Semitic races began to assert itself. Though called Accadian, which is said to mean "Highlanders," their principal seat was in Shumir or Lower Mesopotamia, in the alluvial delta formed in the course of ages by the Euphrates, Tigris, and other rivers which flow into the Persian Gulf; and their traditions point to their civilization having come from the shores of this Gulf, and having gradually spread northwards. Their 59 most ancient cities and temples were in the Lower Province of Shumir, and the bulk of the population continued for ages to be Turanian, while in Accad or Upper Mesopotamia, where the land rises from the alluvial plain up to the mountains of Kurdistan and Armenia, the Semitic element preponderated128 from an early period, though the civilization and religion long remained those of Shumir or Chald?a proper.
When the Semite Sargon I. founded the united monarchy, the capital of which was Agade in the upper province, he made no change in the established state of things, maintained the old temples, and built new ones to the same gods. Before his reign we have, as in the parallel case of Egypt before Menes, little definite information from monuments or historical records. We only know that the country was divided into a number of small states, each grouped about a city with a temple dedicated129 to some god; as Eridhu, the sanctuary130 of Ea, one of the trinity of supreme gods; Larsam, with its Temple of the Sun; Ur, the city of the Moon-god; Sirgalla, with another famous temple. These small states were ruled by patesi, or priest-kings, a term corresponding to the Horsheshu of Egypt; and a fortunate discovery by M. de Sarzec in 1881 at Tell-loh, the site of the ancient Sirgalla, has given us valuable information respecting its patesi. To the surprise of the scientific world, with whom it had been a settled belief that no statues were ever found in Assyrian art, M. de Sarzec discovered and brought home nine large statues of diorite, a very hard black basalt of the same material as that of the statue of Chephren, the builder of the second pyramid, and in the same sitting attitude. The heads had been broken off, but one head was discovered which was of 60 unmistakably Turanian type, beardless, shaved, and with a turban for head-dress. With these statues a number of small works of art were found, representing men and animals of a highly artistic131 design and exquisite132 finish, and also several cylinders. Both these and the backs of the statues are covered with cuneiform inscriptions in the old Accadian characters, which furnish valuable historical information. The name of one of the patesi whose statues were found was Gud-Ea, and his date is computed133 by some of the best authorities at from 4000 to 4500 b.c., probably earlier, and certainly not later than 4000 b.c. This makes the patesi of Sirgalla contemporary with the earliest Egyptian kings, or even earlier, and it shows a state of the arts and civilization then prevailing134 in Chald?a very similar to those of the fourth dynasty in Egypt, and in both cases as advanced as those of 2000 or 3000 years later date.
HEAD OF ANCIENT CHALD?AN. FROM TELL-LOH (SIRGALLA). SARZEC COLLECTION.
(Perrot and Chipiez.)
Before such a temple as that of Sirgalla could have been built and such statues and works of art made, there must have been older and smaller temples and ruder 61 works, just as in Egypt the brick pyramids of Sakkarah and the oldest temples of Heliopolis and Denderah preceded the great pyramids of Gizeh, the temple of Pthah at Memphis, and the diorite statues, wooden statuettes, and other finished works of art of the fourth dynasty.
STATUE OF GUD-EA, WITH INSCRIPTION; FROM TELL-LOH (SIRBURLA OR SIRGALLA) SARZEC COLLECTION. (Hommel.)
It is important to remark that in those earliest monuments both the language and art are primitive Accadian, with no trace of Semitic influences, which must have long prevailed before Sargon I. could have established a Semitic dynasty over an united population 62 of Accads and Semites living together on friendly terms. The normal Semites must have settled gradually in Chald?a, and adopted to a great extent the higher civilization of the Accadians, much as the Tartars in later times did that of the Chinese. It is remarkable135 also that this pre-Semitic Accadian people must have had extensive intercourse with foreign regions, for the diorite of which the statues of Sirgalla are formed is exactly similar to that of the statue of the Egyptian Chephren, and in both cases is only found in the peninsula of Sinai. In fact, an inscription on one of the statues tells us that the stone was brought from the land of Magan, which was the Accadian name for that peninsula. This implies a trade by sea, between Eridhu, the sea-port of Chald?a in early times, and the Red Sea, as such blocks of diorite could hardly have been transported such a distance over such mountains and deserts by land; and this is confirmed by references in old geographical136 tablets to Magan as the land of bronze from the copper mines of Wady-Maghera, and to "ships of Magan" trading from Eridhu.
In any case, it is certain that a very long period of purely137 Accadian civilization must have existed prior to the introduction of Semitic influences, and long before the foundation of a Semitic dynasty by Sargon I. With these facts it will no longer seem surprising that some high authorities assign as early a date as 6000 b.c. for the dawn of Chald?an civilization, and consider that it may be quite as old or even older than that of Egypt.
The great antiquity assigned to these dates from books and monuments is confirmed by other deductions138. The city of Eridhu, which was generally considered to 63 be the oldest in Chald?a, and was the sanctuary of the principal god, Ea, appears to have been a sea-port in those early days, situated139 where the Euphrates flowed into the Persian Gulf. The ruins now stand far inland, and Sayce computes140 that about 6000 years must have elapsed since the sea reached up to them.
Astronomy affords a still more definite confirmation. The earliest records and traditions show that before the commencement of any historic period the year had been divided into twelve months, the course of the sun mapped out among the stars, and a zodiac established of the twelve constellations141, which has continued in use to the present day. The year began with the vernal equinox, and the first month was named after the "propitious142 Bull," whose figure constantly appears on the monuments as opening the year. The sun, therefore, was in Taurus at the vernal equinox when this calendar was formed, which could only be after long centuries of astronomical observation; but it has been in Aries since about 2500 b.c., and first entered in Taurus about 4700 b.c.
Records of eclipses were also kept in the time of Sargon I., which imply a long preceding period of accurate observation; and the Ziggurat, or temple observatory143, built up in successive stages above the alluvial plain, which gave rise to the legend of the Tower of Babel, is found in connection with the earliest temples. The diorite statues also and engraved gems144 found at Sirgalla testify to a thorough knowledge of the arts of metallurgy at this remote period, and to a commercial intercourse with foreign countries from which the copper and tin must have been derived for making bronze tools capable of cutting such hard materials.
64 The existence of such a commercial intercourse in remote times is confirmed by the example of Egypt, where bronze implements145 must have been in use long before the date of Menes; and although copper might have been obtained from Sinai or Cyprus, tin or bronze must have been imported from distant foreign countries alike in Egypt and in Chald?a.
Chald?an chronology therefore leads to almost exactly the same results as that of Egypt. In each case we have a standard or measuring-rod of authentic historical record, of certainly not less than 6000, and more probably 7000 years from the present time; and in each case we find ourselves at this remote date, in presence, not of rude beginnings, but of a civilization already ancient and far advanced. We have populous146 cities, celebrated147 temples, an organized priesthood, an advanced state of agriculture and of the industrial and fine arts; writing and books so long known that their origin is lost in myth; religions in which advanced philosophical148 and moral ideas are already developed; astronomical systems which imply a long course of accurate observations. How long this prehistoric age may have lasted, and how many centuries it may have taken to develop such a civilization, from the primitive beginnings of neolithic149 and pal22?olithic origins, is a matter of conjecture150. Bunsen thinks it may have taken 10,000 years, but there are no dates from which we can infer the time that may be required for civilization to grow up by spontaneous evolution, among nations where it is not aided by contact with more advanced civilizations from without. All we can infer is, that it must have required an immense time, probably much longer than that embraced by the subsequent period of historical record. And 65 we can say with certainty that during the whole of this historical period of 6000 or 7000 years there has been no change in the established order of Nature. The earth has revolved151 round its axis152 and round the sun, the moon and planets have pursued their courses, the duration of human life has not varied153, and there have been no destructions and renovations of life or other traces of miraculous72 interference. And more than this, we can affirm with absolute certainty that 6000 years have not been enough to alter in any perceptible degree the existing physical types of the different races of men and animals, or the primary linguistic154 types of their forms of speech. The Negro, the Turanian, the Semite, and the Aryan, all stand out as clearly distinguished155 in the paintings on Egyptian monuments as they do at the present day; and the agglutinative languages are as distinct from the inflectional, and the Semite from the Aryan forms of inflections, in the old Chald?an cylinders as they are in the nineteenth century.
点击收听单词发音
1 mythical | |
adj.神话的;虚构的;想像的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 inscriptions | |
(作者)题词( inscription的名词复数 ); 献词; 碑文; 证劵持有人的登记 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 inscription | |
n.(尤指石块上的)刻印文字,铭文,碑文 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 cylinder | |
n.圆筒,柱(面),汽缸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 delta | |
n.(流的)角洲 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 astronomical | |
adj.天文学的,(数字)极大的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 domain | |
n.(活动等)领域,范围;领地,势力范围 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 derived | |
vi.起源;由来;衍生;导出v.得到( derive的过去式和过去分词 );(从…中)得到获得;源于;(从…中)提取 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 reigns | |
n.君主的统治( reign的名词复数 );君主统治时期;任期;当政期 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 reign | |
n.统治时期,统治,支配,盛行;v.占优势 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 reigning | |
adj.统治的,起支配作用的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 gulf | |
n.海湾;深渊,鸿沟;分歧,隔阂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 deluge | |
n./vt.洪水,暴雨,使泛滥 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 narrative | |
n.叙述,故事;adj.叙事的,故事体的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 colonized | |
开拓殖民地,移民于殖民地( colonize的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 anterior | |
adj.较早的;在前的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 Christian | |
adj.基督教徒的;n.基督教徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 confirmation | |
n.证实,确认,批准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 narratives | |
记叙文( narrative的名词复数 ); 故事; 叙述; 叙述部分 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 testament | |
n.遗嘱;证明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 pal | |
n.朋友,伙伴,同志;vi.结为友 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 migration | |
n.迁移,移居,(鸟类等的)迁徙 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 dense | |
a.密集的,稠密的,浓密的;密度大的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 apparently | |
adv.显然地;表面上,似乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 interval | |
n.间隔,间距;幕间休息,中场休息 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 scattered | |
adj.分散的,稀疏的;散步的;疏疏落落的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 intercourse | |
n.性交;交流,交往,交际 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 philistines | |
n.市侩,庸人( philistine的名词复数 );庸夫俗子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 reigned | |
vi.当政,统治(reign的过去式形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 profane | |
adj.亵神的,亵渎的;vt.亵渎,玷污 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 fixed | |
adj.固定的,不变的,准备好的;(计算机)固定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 ransom | |
n.赎金,赎身;v.赎回,解救 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 tributary | |
n.支流;纳贡国;adj.附庸的;辅助的;支流的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 vassal | |
n.附庸的;属下;adj.奴仆的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 accurately | |
adv.准确地,精确地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 vassalage | |
n.家臣身份,隶属 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 besieging | |
包围,围困,围攻( besiege的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 deposed | |
v.罢免( depose的过去式和过去分词 );(在法庭上)宣誓作证 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 intriguing | |
adj.有趣的;迷人的v.搞阴谋诡计(intrigue的现在分词);激起…的好奇心 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 besieged | |
包围,围困,围攻( besiege的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 repulse | |
n.击退,拒绝;vt.逐退,击退,拒绝 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 conqueror | |
n.征服者,胜利者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 akin | |
adj.同族的,类似的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 retrospect | |
n.回顾,追溯;v.回顾,回想,追溯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 mound | |
n.土墩,堤,小山;v.筑堤,用土堆防卫 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 mounds | |
土堆,土丘( mound的名词复数 ); 一大堆 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 vertical | |
adj.垂直的,顶点的,纵向的;n.垂直物,垂直的位置 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 triangular | |
adj.三角(形)的,三者间的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 primitive | |
adj.原始的;简单的;n.原(始)人,原始事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 pictorial | |
adj.绘画的;图片的;n.画报 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 phonetic | |
adj.语言的,语言上的,表示语音的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 allied | |
adj.协约国的;同盟国的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 intelligible | |
adj.可理解的,明白易懂的,清楚的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 pompous | |
adj.傲慢的,自大的;夸大的;豪华的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 monarch | |
n.帝王,君主,最高统治者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 monarchs | |
君主,帝王( monarch的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 specimens | |
n.样品( specimen的名词复数 );范例;(化验的)抽样;某种类型的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60 hieroglyphic | |
n.象形文字 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61 ingenuity | |
n.别出心裁;善于发明创造 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62 component | |
n.组成部分,成分,元件;adj.组成的,合成的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63 engraved | |
v.在(硬物)上雕刻(字,画等)( engrave的过去式和过去分词 );将某事物深深印在(记忆或头脑中) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64 precipice | |
n.悬崖,危急的处境 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65 defile | |
v.弄污,弄脏;n.(山间)小道 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
66 conspicuous | |
adj.明眼的,惹人注目的;炫耀的,摆阔气的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
67 complexity | |
n.复杂(性),复杂的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
68 syllables | |
n.音节( syllable的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
69 consonants | |
n.辅音,子音( consonant的名词复数 );辅音字母 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
70 vowels | |
n.元音,元音字母( vowel的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
71 surmounted | |
战胜( surmount的过去式和过去分词 ); 克服(困难); 居于…之上; 在…顶上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
72 miraculous | |
adj.像奇迹一样的,不可思议的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
73 miraculously | |
ad.奇迹般地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
74 preservation | |
n.保护,维护,保存,保留,保持 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
75 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
76 alluvial | |
adj.冲积的;淤积的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
77 deserted | |
adj.荒芜的,荒废的,无人的,被遗弃的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
78 crumbled | |
(把…)弄碎, (使)碎成细屑( crumble的过去式和过去分词 ); 衰落; 坍塌; 损坏 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
79 durable | |
adj.持久的,耐久的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
80 perishable | |
adj.(尤指食物)易腐的,易坏的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
81 cylinders | |
n.圆筒( cylinder的名词复数 );圆柱;汽缸;(尤指用作容器的)圆筒状物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
82 tenacious | |
adj.顽强的,固执的,记忆力强的,粘的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
83 notably | |
adv.值得注意地,显著地,尤其地,特别地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
84 obsolete | |
adj.已废弃的,过时的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
85 hieroglyphics | |
n.pl.象形文字 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
86 immediate | |
adj.立即的;直接的,最接近的;紧靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
87 synchronizes | |
n.同步器( synchronize的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
88 memorable | |
adj.值得回忆的,难忘的,特别的,显著的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
89 civilized | |
a.有教养的,文雅的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
90 barbarians | |
n.野蛮人( barbarian的名词复数 );外国人;粗野的人;无教养的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
91 equilibrium | |
n.平衡,均衡,相称,均势,平静 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
92 supremacy | |
n.至上;至高权力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
93 minor | |
adj.较小(少)的,较次要的;n.辅修学科;vi.辅修 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
94 relics | |
[pl.]n.遗物,遗迹,遗产;遗体,尸骸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
95 deity | |
n.神,神性;被奉若神明的人(或物) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
96 ascertained | |
v.弄清,确定,查明( ascertain的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
97 zealous | |
adj.狂热的,热心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
98 Founder | |
n.创始者,缔造者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
99 founders | |
n.创始人( founder的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
100 posterity | |
n.后裔,子孙,后代 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
101 chamber | |
n.房间,寝室;会议厅;议院;会所 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
102 recording | |
n.录音,记录 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
103 behold | |
v.看,注视,看到 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
104 conclusive | |
adj.最后的,结论的;确凿的,消除怀疑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
105 motive | |
n.动机,目的;adv.发动的,运动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
106 wilful | |
adj.任性的,故意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
107 authentic | |
a.真的,真正的;可靠的,可信的,有根据的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
108 detailed | |
adj.详细的,详尽的,极注意细节的,完全的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
109 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
110 mighty | |
adj.强有力的;巨大的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
111 conceal | |
v.隐藏,隐瞒,隐蔽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
112 bitumen | |
n.沥青 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
113 antiquity | |
n.古老;高龄;古物,古迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
114 rugged | |
adj.高低不平的,粗糙的,粗壮的,强健的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
115 copper | |
n.铜;铜币;铜器;adj.铜(制)的;(紫)铜色的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
116 turquoise | |
n.绿宝石;adj.蓝绿色的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
117 perfectly | |
adv.完美地,无可非议地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
118 conclusively | |
adv.令人信服地,确凿地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
119 monarchy | |
n.君主,最高统治者;君主政体,君主国 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
120 industrious | |
adj.勤劳的,刻苦的,奋发的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
121 addicted | |
adj.沉溺于....的,对...上瘾的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
122 specially | |
adv.特定地;特殊地;明确地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
123 superstitious | |
adj.迷信的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
124 omens | |
n.前兆,预兆( omen的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
125 remarkably | |
ad.不同寻常地,相当地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
126 prehistoric | |
adj.(有记载的)历史以前的,史前的,古老的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
127 fabulous | |
adj.极好的;极为巨大的;寓言中的,传说中的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
128 preponderated | |
v.超过,胜过( preponderate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
129 dedicated | |
adj.一心一意的;献身的;热诚的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
130 sanctuary | |
n.圣所,圣堂,寺庙;禁猎区,保护区 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
131 artistic | |
adj.艺术(家)的,美术(家)的;善于艺术创作的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
132 exquisite | |
adj.精美的;敏锐的;剧烈的,感觉强烈的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
133 computed | |
adj.[医]计算的,使用计算机的v.计算,估算( compute的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
134 prevailing | |
adj.盛行的;占优势的;主要的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
135 remarkable | |
adj.显著的,异常的,非凡的,值得注意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
136 geographical | |
adj.地理的;地区(性)的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
137 purely | |
adv.纯粹地,完全地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
138 deductions | |
扣除( deduction的名词复数 ); 结论; 扣除的量; 推演 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
139 situated | |
adj.坐落在...的,处于某种境地的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
140 computes | |
v.计算,估算( compute的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
141 constellations | |
n.星座( constellation的名词复数 );一群杰出人物;一系列(相关的想法、事物);一群(相关的人) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
142 propitious | |
adj.吉利的;顺利的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
143 observatory | |
n.天文台,气象台,瞭望台,观测台 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
144 gems | |
growth; economy; management; and customer satisfaction 增长 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
145 implements | |
n.工具( implement的名词复数 );家具;手段;[法律]履行(契约等)v.实现( implement的第三人称单数 );执行;贯彻;使生效 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
146 populous | |
adj.人口稠密的,人口众多的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
147 celebrated | |
adj.有名的,声誉卓著的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
148 philosophical | |
adj.哲学家的,哲学上的,达观的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
149 neolithic | |
adj.新石器时代的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
150 conjecture | |
n./v.推测,猜测 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
151 revolved | |
v.(使)旋转( revolve的过去式和过去分词 );细想 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
152 axis | |
n.轴,轴线,中心线;坐标轴,基准线 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
153 varied | |
adj.多样的,多变化的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
154 linguistic | |
adj.语言的,语言学的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
155 distinguished | |
adj.卓越的,杰出的,著名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |