There is a time for boys to learn to swim, hunt, fish, build huts, make boats, gather collections, play ball, love nature, work; or by neglect of this time, to lack interest in142 both work and play for the rest of their lives. There is a time also for learning the social arts and the social virtues1. If this time passes with these lessons unlearned, it becomes highly improbable that they ever will be learned at all.
So far, then, as education is a biological question, it tends to resolve itself into the problem of utilizing3 the boy’s instinctive4 interests as a basis for his formal training. This is especially true of his moral education. We take the boy at an impressionable age, an age during which he is probably more plastic than at any other time of life, either before or after. We can lead him through the group life of the gang, while the social instincts are being born and fashioned, into a social life of the highest ideals and devotion; or on the other hand, we may make him an unsocial or an anti-social being for life. The gang is a natural and a necessary stage in normal development. Carefully watched and wisely controlled, it is both the most natural and the least expensive instrument that we can employ to help our sons143 through one of the most critical periods of their lives. Nine tenths of the gang’s activities depend on primitive5 instinctive impulses, which cannot be suppressed, and which need only to be sanely6 guided to carry the boy along the path which nature has marked out and bring him out at the end a useful citizen and a good man. The men who have been most successful in handling boys, men like Arnold of Rugby, Judge Lindsay and William R. George, are precisely7 the men who have appealed most powerfully to those boyish impulses.
Of all the gang-nurtured social virtues, loyalty8 and its allies stand easily first. The gang, indeed, exists only because of the loyalty of its members to one another. Without this mutual9 loyalty there could be no gangs. All the great leaders and successful trainers of boys use the lever of loyalty in reaching and holding their boys. Note the words of Judge Lindsay with Harry10. “Judge! Judge! If you let me go, I’ll never get you into trouble again!” “I had him. It was the voice of loyalty. I have used144 that appeal to loyalty hundreds of times since in our work with boys and it is almost infallibly successful.” If we study the secret of the power of William R. George, we find him using the same strong lever. He trusts boys; he appeals to their loyalty; and he wins the toughest boys, with whom many others have failed.
This gang loyalty, however, is by no means a loyalty to individuals only; it is a loyalty also to ideals. The boy refuses to “squeal” under pressure, partly to shield his fellows, but still more because squealing11 is contrary to the boys’ moral code. He joins the tribal12 wars, partly because, like the good barbarian13 he is, he loves his neighbor and hates his enemy, but quite as much because certain fightings are demanded by the gang’s standard of honor. The moral education of the gang from the outside, therefore, consists, in part, of a deft14 substitution of the best ideals of the grown-up world in place of the crude standards of youth. But it must be deftly15 done and always, at any price, without violence to the immemorial code of Boyville.
145 Forgetting this, many an honest and zealous16 parent and teacher does irreparable harm when he finds the boy’s moral code at variance17 with the man’s. Unquestionably, for example, all good citizens, if adult, ought to inform the proper authorities of any violations18 of law and order, and to use their best efforts to bring offenders19 to justice. That we do not always take the trouble to do this, is an important reason why we are so badly governed. But the boy’s code is precisely opposite. The good citizen of Boyville will shield the offender20, and persistently21 refuse information to the authorities. It is far better to let boyish offenses22 go unpunished than to encourage boys to violate their native moral instincts; and all great schoolmasters have acted on this principle.
Less gifted teachers are often sorely tempted24 to listen to tell-taleing. It is often the quickest way to solve deep mysteries. Is it not better, however, to remain ignorant and suffer, rather than receive information from the boys’ traitor25? Three out of four of our boys admire the loyal playmate, and despise146 the traitor. When the teacher listens to volunteer assistants, she loses the good will of all the loyalists. From that day on, she has enlisted26 with the minority, who are the traitors28 and outcasts among their playmates.
The fond mamma is, naturally, the chief sinner in this regard. It often happens that dear Charlie comes in from his play and says, “Johnnie hit me.” Mamma says, “I will attend to that matter,” and she volunteers to go over and give Johnnie’s mamma a free lecture on how to raise children. Charlie enjoys the excitement, and reports to his mother the next quarrel which he starts. If Charlie’s mother had said, “Charlie, it takes two to make a quarrel, and when you get into trouble it is more manly29 for you to settle the matter without coming to me,” his whole career of life might have been happier and better. Too often the mother’s encouragement makes a decent and manly boy into a tell-tale and a coward, and so cuts him off from one of the great educative influences of life.
For the explanation why only three in every four boys are in gangs, instead of four147 in every four, is largely that the fourth boy is one whom the gang will not have. Some boys, of course, are solitary30 by nature,—sensitive, retiring boys who do not care for the rough life of the gang, but prefer to play alone, with one companion, or with girls. Some, too, grow up in isolated31 neighborhoods where there are few other boys of the same age. These lose, perforce, the education that comes in the gang. But the rest who stay out of the gang, stay out for the gang’s good. They have been trained, often against their nature, to do violence to the gang’s standard of honor. They fail to pass through the normal development of human males; they lack a fundamental virtue2 and their fellows will not trust them, boy or man.
In the gang, then, we find the natural time and place for the somewhat sudden birth and development of that spirit of loyalty which is the foundation of most of our social relations. We must, in short, look upon the gang as nature’s special training-school for the social virtues. Only by associating himself with other boys can any youth learn the148 knack32 of getting on with his fellow men; acquire and practice co?peration, self-sacrifice, loyalty, fidelity33, team play; and in general prepare himself to become the politician, the business man, the efficient citizen of a democracy. Nature, we must believe, has given the boy the gang instincts for the sake of making easy for him the practice of the gang virtues. It may well be questioned whether any association of state or church or neighborhood or school or order has had a greater influence over the lives of most of us men than had the dozen or so of boys who were our intimate companions between the ages of twelve and fifteen.
We must not forget that the instinctive vices34 of the gang tend largely to be self-limiting, so that the boy, even if left entirely35 alone, would outgrow36 most of his faults. Not so with the gang virtues. The impulses to loyalty, fidelity, co?peration, self-sacrifice, justice, which are at the basis of gang psychology37, are powerfully reinforced, as we have already seen, by nearly all the typical gang activities.
149 Even collective stealing is a lesson in co?peration. Thieving expeditions are often definitely planned; one boy watches while the others steal; one engages the attention of the storekeeper while another annexes38 his property; one member of the gang plagues the victim to get chased, and then the rest loot his goods. Most especially, however, in the group games of the gang do we find the most convenient tool for teaching many of the most essential social qualities. “In playing group games,” says Joseph Lee, “morality is being born and the social man, man the politician, man the citizen; and it is my belief that in most instances this political or social man will get himself thoroughly39 and successfully born in no other way.”
The steady pressure of gang life on the side of the social virtues appears strikingly in the rules and customs of the organizations.
“Put me out,” reports one youth, “because I said one fellow didn’t have spunk40 to play the leader.” “Put a boy out of the gang for fighting when he didn’t need to.” “Put a fellow out once for fighting with150 another boy. The other fellow was in the right.” “Never allow a big fellow to pick on a little one. We were against smoking.” “Had to be at work when he comes into the gang; must pay his dues.” “All stand up for a fellow in trouble.” “Help each other out if we get into trouble.” “If anybody picked on one of our fellows, we would fight them.” “If a fellow didn’t divvy up, we started fighting with him.” “Put a fellow out because he wouldn’t take his share of expense.” “A fellow wouldn’t share up, so we fought him.” “Put three out for bossing and running the place.” “No fellow ever told on us. One fellow was caught. He stayed in Charles Street jail three months before the rest of us were caught.”
Or consider the following unwritten laws of various gangs as a preparation for a law-abiding life. “If there was a dispute, leader settled it. If two fellows were fighting for a thing, he took it away from them and gave it to another fellow. In playing dice41, chuck the fellow out who made the dispute.” “I was leader. Would settle disputes. Would151 say whether it was right or not.” “Quarrel for five or ten minutes, and then ask N. to settle it. We would be satisfied with what he would say.” “The officers would most always settle the disputes. Talk it over, get circumstances, then settle it.” “One of the bigger boys would settle it. They would stop the fighting.” “If we had disputes, we would vote on it. One who would get majority, to him we would leave it go.” “Get a fellow who could keep things to himself.” “If he knew enough to keep still, let him come in.” “If he was a good guy and round the corner every night, after a while let him in if he was not a squealer42.”
A “squealer,” be it observed, is one who, being caught in an escapade, tells on the rest to save his own skin.
Disloyalty is the one unforgivable offense23 in boyish eyes, the one crime which inevitably43 leads to expulsion from the gang. “If he went against us, call him a back-biter. Chuck him out.” “Put a fellow out for squealing on them.” “Put him out because he would run off when needed to fight.”
152 Among twenty-one boys who had been expelled from their gangs, eleven were put out for disloyalty, three for fighting in bad causes, and but one each for all other reasons. There is no other institution on earth that can take its place beside the boys’ gang for the cultivation44 of unswerving loyalty to the group.
Close beside loyalty and fidelity, come the related virtues of obedience45, self-sacrifice, and co?peration. The boy who will not obey the captain cannot play with the group. Baseball and football are impossible without co?peration, and they demand constant self-sacrifice of the individual to the team. The gang fight, brutal46 and useless as it commonly is, also calls for the highest devotion. It is fought, not for personal ends but for the honor of the gang. Often the fight is to redress47 the wrongs of another member of the gang; not infrequently it is on behalf of a younger brother of some member. In the great battle between C—— and E—— in which nearly a thousand boys took part, the casus belli was the wrongs of the little153 C—— lads on whom the E—— gangs had been “picking” beyond custom.
After all, there is nothing finer in all our human history than the loyalty of men to comrade and chief, to regiment48 and king and country, and their obedience even unto death. The Old Guard at Waterloo, the Spartans49 at Thermopyl?, the Boy on the Burning Deck, the Roman Guard at Pompeii, Horatius, Arnold von Winkelried,—who of us was not brought up on these stories? The manly virtues are instinctive in proper men, but men first learn their practice in the gang.
Almost every activity of the gang is a lesson in co?peration. Not only the group games and the fighting, but the peaceful tribal occupations,—the hunting, fishing, exploring, hut-building, swimming, skating,—all have to be done more or less in common. Tact50, adaptability51, skill in getting on with one’s fellows, are among the minor27 virtues of the gang. So, too, is the spirit of democracy, for the gang is as little snobbish52 as any human group. It puts a premium154 also on strength of body, while most of its typical activities involve wholesome53 physical exercise which most boys would hardly undertake alone.
Last, but by no means least, of the gang virtues comes courage. Now courage and self-reliance are partly a matter of habit. One simply gets accustomed to danger, and so meets it without fear, knowing that he can take care of himself. Baseball and football are both brave games. The boy who is afraid to get his shins kicked, or to stand up to bat against a swift pitcher54, has no place in either. Fighting often demands high courage, especially in group fight, where one cannot stop to pick an opponent of his own size but must stand his ground against all comers, little and big. Then there are also the “stunts” and “dares” which the members of the gang give one another. These also are a constant incentive55 to bravery. The coward is a social outcast who has no place in the gang; but the timid boy stands to have his timidity shamed and practiced out of him. For the naturally brave boy in155 the gang, courage soon becomes a fixed56 habit.
Considerations such as the foregoing are rapidly bringing about in the minds of educators, social workers and enlightened parents a radical57 alteration58 of opinion with regard to the nature and influence of boys’ gangs. The time was when it was the nearly universal opinion that all gangs are bad and should be broken up as quickly as possible. This opinion, it must be admitted, is still that of a considerable majority of persons.
Of recent years, however, we are coming to see that this older attitude is not only false but futile59. Man is a social animal, the social spirit in him has had a very long history, and the fundamental social virtues which support the complex structure of our modern civilization have been built into man’s nature through thousands of generations. The little boy is an extreme individualist; somewhere he must be born again into the world of social co?peration. For the beginning of this new life, the gang seems to be the natural156 place. It is through the gang and by means of the gang that the modern educator and the modern parent will train the growing boy to his part in the collective life of the community.
点击收听单词发音
1 virtues | |
美德( virtue的名词复数 ); 德行; 优点; 长处 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 virtue | |
n.德行,美德;贞操;优点;功效,效力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 utilizing | |
v.利用,使用( utilize的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 instinctive | |
adj.(出于)本能的;直觉的;(出于)天性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 primitive | |
adj.原始的;简单的;n.原(始)人,原始事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 sanely | |
ad.神志清楚地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 precisely | |
adv.恰好,正好,精确地,细致地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 loyalty | |
n.忠诚,忠心 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 mutual | |
adj.相互的,彼此的;共同的,共有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 harry | |
vt.掠夺,蹂躏,使苦恼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 squealing | |
v.长声尖叫,用长而尖锐的声音说( squeal的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 tribal | |
adj.部族的,种族的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 barbarian | |
n.野蛮人;adj.野蛮(人)的;未开化的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 deft | |
adj.灵巧的,熟练的(a deft hand 能手) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 deftly | |
adv.灵巧地,熟练地,敏捷地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 zealous | |
adj.狂热的,热心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 variance | |
n.矛盾,不同 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 violations | |
违反( violation的名词复数 ); 冒犯; 违反(行为、事例); 强奸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 offenders | |
n.冒犯者( offender的名词复数 );犯规者;罪犯;妨害…的人(或事物) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 offender | |
n.冒犯者,违反者,犯罪者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 persistently | |
ad.坚持地;固执地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 offenses | |
n.进攻( offense的名词复数 );(球队的)前锋;进攻方法;攻势 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 offense | |
n.犯规,违法行为;冒犯,得罪 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 tempted | |
v.怂恿(某人)干不正当的事;冒…的险(tempt的过去分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 traitor | |
n.叛徒,卖国贼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 enlisted | |
adj.应募入伍的v.(使)入伍, (使)参军( enlist的过去式和过去分词 );获得(帮助或支持) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 minor | |
adj.较小(少)的,较次要的;n.辅修学科;vi.辅修 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 traitors | |
卖国贼( traitor的名词复数 ); 叛徒; 背叛者; 背信弃义的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 manly | |
adj.有男子气概的;adv.男子般地,果断地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 solitary | |
adj.孤独的,独立的,荒凉的;n.隐士 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 isolated | |
adj.与世隔绝的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 knack | |
n.诀窍,做事情的灵巧的,便利的方法 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 fidelity | |
n.忠诚,忠实;精确 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 vices | |
缺陷( vice的名词复数 ); 恶习; 不道德行为; 台钳 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 outgrow | |
vt.长大得使…不再适用;成长得不再要 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 psychology | |
n.心理,心理学,心理状态 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 annexes | |
并吞( annex的名词复数 ); 兼并; 强占; 并吞(国家、地区等); 附加物,附属建筑( annexe的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 thoroughly | |
adv.完全地,彻底地,十足地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 spunk | |
n.勇气,胆量 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 dice | |
n.骰子;vt.把(食物)切成小方块,冒险 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 squealer | |
发出尖叫声的人;雏鸽;小松鸡;小鹌鹑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 inevitably | |
adv.不可避免地;必然发生地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 cultivation | |
n.耕作,培养,栽培(法),养成 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 obedience | |
n.服从,顺从 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 brutal | |
adj.残忍的,野蛮的,不讲理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 redress | |
n.赔偿,救济,矫正;v.纠正,匡正,革除 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 regiment | |
n.团,多数,管理;v.组织,编成团,统制 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 spartans | |
n.斯巴达(spartan的复数形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 tact | |
n.机敏,圆滑,得体 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 adaptability | |
n.适应性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 snobbish | |
adj.势利的,谄上欺下的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 wholesome | |
adj.适合;卫生的;有益健康的;显示身心健康的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 pitcher | |
n.(有嘴和柄的)大水罐;(棒球)投手 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 incentive | |
n.刺激;动力;鼓励;诱因;动机 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 fixed | |
adj.固定的,不变的,准备好的;(计算机)固定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 radical | |
n.激进份子,原子团,根号;adj.根本的,激进的,彻底的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 alteration | |
n.变更,改变;蚀变 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 futile | |
adj.无效的,无用的,无希望的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |