I know this view is to some extent opposed to the common ideas of people at large (and especially of that particular European people which "dearly loves a lord") as to the relative position of aristocracies and democracies in the sliding scale of human development. There is a common though wholly unfounded belief knocking about the world, that the aristocrat4 is better in intelligence, in culture, in arts, in manners, than the ordinary plebeian5. The fact is, being, like all barbarians6, a boastful creature, he has gone on so long asserting his own profound superiority by birth to the world around him—a superiority as of fine porcelain8 to common clay—that the world around him has at last actually begun to accept him at his own valuation. Most English people in particular think that a lord is born a better judge of pictures and wines and books and deportment than the human average of us. But history shows us the exact opposite. It is a plain historical fact, provable by simple enumeration9, that almost all the aristocracies the world has ever known have taken their rise in the conquest of civilised and cultivated races by barbaric invaders10; and that the barbaric invaders have seldom or never learned the practical arts and handicrafts which are the civilising element in the life of the conquered people around them.
To begin with the aristocracies best known to most of us, the noble families of modern and medi?val Europe sprang, as a whole, from the Teutonic invasion of the Roman Empire. In Italy, it was the Lombards and the Goths who formed the bulk of the great ruling families; all the well-known aristocratic names of medi?val Italy are without exception Teutonic. In Gaul it was the rude Frank who gave the aristocratic element to the mixed nationality, while it was the civilised and cultivated Romano-Celtic provincial11 who became, by fate, the mere12 roturier. The great revolution, it has been well said, was, ethnically13 speaking, nothing more than the revolt of the Celtic against the Teutonic fraction; and, one might add also, the revolt of the civilised Romanised serf against the barbaric seigneur. In Spain, the hidalgo is just the hi d'al Go, the son of the Goth, the descendant of those rude Visigothic conquerors who broke down the old civilisation of Iberian and Romanised Hispania. And so on throughout. All over Europe, if you care to look close, you will find the aristocrat was the son of the intrusive14 barbarian7; the democrat15 was the son of the old civilised and educated autochthonous people.
It is just the same elsewhere, wherever we turn. Take Greece, for example. Its most aristocratic state was undoubtedly16 Sparta, where a handful of essentially17 barbaric Dorians held in check a much larger and Helotised population of higher original civilisation. Take the East: the Persian was a wild mountain adventurer who imposed himself as an aristocrat upon the far more cultivated Babylonian, Assyrian, and Egyptian. The same sort of thing had happened earlier in time in Babylonia and Assyria themselves, where barbaric conquerors had similarly imposed themselves upon the first known historical civilisations. Take India under the Moguls, once more; the aristocracy of the time consisted of the rude Mahommedan Tartar, who lorded it over the ancient enchorial culture of Rajpoot and Brahmin. Take China: the same thing over again—a Tartar horde18 imposing19 its savage20 rule over the most ancient civilised people of Asia. Take England: its aristocracy at different times has consisted of the various barbaric invaders, first the Anglo-Saxon (if I must use that hateful and misleading word)—a pirate from Sleswick; then the Dane, another pirate from Denmark direct; then the Norman, a yet younger Danish pirate, with a thin veneer21 of early French culture, who came over from Normandy to better himself after just two generations of Christian22 apprenticeship23. Go where you will, it matters not where you look; from the Aztec in Mexico to the Turk at Constantinople or the Arab in North Africa, the aristocrat belongs invariably to a lower race than the civilised people whom he has conquered and subjugated24.
"That may be true, perhaps," you object, "as to the remote historical origin of aristocracies; but surely the aristocrat of later generations has acquired all the science, all the art, all the polish of the people he lives amongst. He is the flower of their civilisation." Don't you believe it! There isn't a word of truth in it. From first to last the aristocrat remains25, what Matthew Arnold so justly called him, a barbarian. I often wonder, indeed, whether Arnold himself really recognised the literal and actual truth of his own brilliant generalisation. For the aristocratic ideas and the aristocratic pursuits remain to the very end essentially barbaric. The "gentleman" never soils his high-born hands with dirty work; in other words, he holds himself severely26 aloof27 from the trades and handicrafts which constitute civilisation. The arts that train and educate hand, eye, and brain he ignorantly despises. In the early middle ages he did not even condescend28 to read and write, those inferior accomplishments29 being badges of serfdom. If you look close at the "occupations of a gentleman" in the present day, you will find they are all of purely30 barbaric character. They descend2 to us direct from the semi-savage invaders who overthrew31 the structure of the Roman empire, and replaced its civilised organisation32 by the military and barbaric system of feudalism. The "gentleman" is above all things a fighter, a hunter, a fisher—he preserves the three simplest and commonest barbaric functions. He is not a practiser of any civilised or civilising art—a craftsman33, a maker34, a worker in metal, in stone, in textile fabrics35, in pottery36. These are the things that constitute civilisation; but the aristocrat does none of them; in the famous words of one who now loves to mix with English gentlemen, "he toils37 not, neither does he spin." The things he may do are, to fight by sea and land, like his ancestor the Goth and his ancestor the Viking; to slay38 pheasant and partridge, like his predatory forefathers39; to fish for salmon40 in the Highlands; to hunt the fox, to sail the yacht, to scour42 the earth in search of great game—lions, elephants, buffalo43. His one task is to kill—either his kind or his quarry44.
Observe, too, the essentially barbaric nature of the gentleman's home—his trappings, his distinctive45 marks, his surroundings, his titles. He lives by choice in the wildest country, like his skin-clad ancestors, demanding only that there be game and foxes and fish for his delectation. He loves the moors46, the wolds, the fens47, the braes, the Highlands, not as the painter, the naturalist48, or the searcher after beauty of scenery loves them—for the sake of their wild life, their heather and bracken, their fresh keen air, their boundless49 horizon—but for the sake of the thoroughly50 barbarous existence he and his dogs and his gillies can lead in them. The fact is, neither he nor his ancestors have ever been really civilised. Barbarians in the midst of an industrial community, they have lived their own life of slaying51 and playing, untouched by the culture of the world below them. Knights52 in the middle ages, squires53 in the eighteenth century, they have never received a tincture of the civilising arts and crafts and industries; they have fought and fished and hunted in uninterrupted succession since the days when wild in woods the noble savage ran, to the days when they pay extravagant54 rents for Scottish grouse55 moors. Their very titles are barbaric and military—knight and earl and marquis and duke, early crystallised names for leaders in war or protectors of the frontier. Their crests56 and coats of arms are but the totems of their savage predecessors57, afterwards utilised by medi?val blacksmiths as distinguishing marks for the summit of a helmet. They decorate their halls with savage trophies58 of the chase, like the Zulu or the Red Indian; they hang up captured arms and looted Chinese jars from the Summer Palace in their semi-civilised drawing-rooms. They love to be surrounded by grooms59 and gamekeepers and other barbaric retainers; they pass their lives in the midst of serfs; their views about the position and rights of women—especially the women of the "lower orders"—are frankly60 African. They share the sentiments of Achilles as to the individuality of Chryseis and Briseis.
Such is the actual aristocrat, as we now behold61 him. Thus, living his own barbarous life in the midst of a civilised community of workers and artists and thinkers and craftsmen62, with whom he seldom mingles63, and with whom he has nothing in common, this chartered relic64 of worse days preserves from first to last many painful traits of the low moral and social ideas of his ancestors, from which he has never varied65. He represents most of all, in the modern world, the surviving savage. His love of gewgaws, of titles, of uniform, of dress, of feathers, of decorations, of Highland41 kilts, and stars and garters, is but one external symbol of his lower grade of mental and moral status. All over Europe, the truly civilised classes have gone on progressing by the practice of peaceful arts from generation to generation; but the aristocrat has stood still at the same half-savage level, a hunter and fighter, an orgiastic roysterer, a killer66 of wild boars and wearer of absurd medi?val costumes, too childish for the civilised and cultivated commoner.
Government by aristocrats67 is thus government by the mentally and morally inferior. And yet—a Bill for giving at last some scant68 measure of self-government to persecuted69 Ireland has to run the gauntlet, in our nineteenth-century England, of an irresponsible House of hereditary70 barbarians!
点击收听单词发音
1 conquerors | |
征服者,占领者( conqueror的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 descend | |
vt./vi.传下来,下来,下降 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 civilisation | |
n.文明,文化,开化,教化 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 aristocrat | |
n.贵族,有贵族气派的人,上层人物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 plebeian | |
adj.粗俗的;平民的;n.平民;庶民 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 barbarians | |
n.野蛮人( barbarian的名词复数 );外国人;粗野的人;无教养的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 barbarian | |
n.野蛮人;adj.野蛮(人)的;未开化的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 porcelain | |
n.瓷;adj.瓷的,瓷制的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 enumeration | |
n.计数,列举;细目;详表;点查 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 invaders | |
入侵者,侵略者,侵入物( invader的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 provincial | |
adj.省的,地方的;n.外省人,乡下人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 mere | |
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 ethnically | |
adv.人种上,民族上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 intrusive | |
adj.打搅的;侵扰的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 democrat | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士;民主党党员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 undoubtedly | |
adv.确实地,无疑地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 essentially | |
adv.本质上,实质上,基本上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 horde | |
n.群众,一大群 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 imposing | |
adj.使人难忘的,壮丽的,堂皇的,雄伟的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 savage | |
adj.野蛮的;凶恶的,残暴的;n.未开化的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 veneer | |
n.(墙上的)饰面,虚饰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 Christian | |
adj.基督教徒的;n.基督教徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 apprenticeship | |
n.学徒身份;学徒期 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 subjugated | |
v.征服,降伏( subjugate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 severely | |
adv.严格地;严厉地;非常恶劣地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 aloof | |
adj.远离的;冷淡的,漠不关心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 condescend | |
v.俯就,屈尊;堕落,丢丑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 accomplishments | |
n.造诣;完成( accomplishment的名词复数 );技能;成绩;成就 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 purely | |
adv.纯粹地,完全地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 overthrew | |
overthrow的过去式 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 organisation | |
n.组织,安排,团体,有机休 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 craftsman | |
n.技工,精于一门工艺的匠人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 maker | |
n.制造者,制造商 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 fabrics | |
织物( fabric的名词复数 ); 布; 构造; (建筑物的)结构(如墙、地面、屋顶):质地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 pottery | |
n.陶器,陶器场 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 toils | |
网 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 slay | |
v.杀死,宰杀,杀戮 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 forefathers | |
n.祖先,先人;祖先,祖宗( forefather的名词复数 );列祖列宗;前人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 salmon | |
n.鲑,大马哈鱼,橙红色的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 highland | |
n.(pl.)高地,山地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 scour | |
v.搜索;擦,洗,腹泻,冲刷 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 buffalo | |
n.(北美)野牛;(亚洲)水牛 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 quarry | |
n.采石场;v.采石;费力地找 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 distinctive | |
adj.特别的,有特色的,与众不同的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 moors | |
v.停泊,系泊(船只)( moor的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 fens | |
n.(尤指英格兰东部的)沼泽地带( fen的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 naturalist | |
n.博物学家(尤指直接观察动植物者) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 boundless | |
adj.无限的;无边无际的;巨大的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 thoroughly | |
adv.完全地,彻底地,十足地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 slaying | |
杀戮。 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 knights | |
骑士; (中古时代的)武士( knight的名词复数 ); 骑士; 爵士; (国际象棋中)马 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 squires | |
n.地主,乡绅( squire的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 extravagant | |
adj.奢侈的;过分的;(言行等)放肆的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 grouse | |
n.松鸡;v.牢骚,诉苦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 crests | |
v.到达山顶(或浪峰)( crest的第三人称单数 );到达洪峰,达到顶点 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 predecessors | |
n.前任( predecessor的名词复数 );前辈;(被取代的)原有事物;前身 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 trophies | |
n.(为竞赛获胜者颁发的)奖品( trophy的名词复数 );奖杯;(尤指狩猎或战争中获得的)纪念品;(用于比赛或赛跑名称)奖 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 grooms | |
n.新郎( groom的名词复数 );马夫v.照料或梳洗(马等)( groom的第三人称单数 );使做好准备;训练;(给动物)擦洗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60 frankly | |
adv.坦白地,直率地;坦率地说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61 behold | |
v.看,注视,看到 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62 craftsmen | |
n. 技工 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63 mingles | |
混合,混入( mingle的第三人称单数 ); 混进,与…交往[联系] | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64 relic | |
n.神圣的遗物,遗迹,纪念物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65 varied | |
adj.多样的,多变化的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
66 killer | |
n.杀人者,杀人犯,杀手,屠杀者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
67 aristocrats | |
n.贵族( aristocrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
68 scant | |
adj.不充分的,不足的;v.减缩,限制,忽略 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
69 persecuted | |
(尤指宗教或政治信仰的)迫害(~sb. for sth.)( persecute的过去式和过去分词 ); 烦扰,困扰或骚扰某人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
70 hereditary | |
adj.遗传的,遗传性的,可继承的,世袭的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |