We know too well that man is not a perfect being. Were he perfect, he would not reflect a vague resemblance of God; he would be God himself. He is imperfect, then,—subject to error and to suffering,—but, on the other hand, were he stationary6, what title could he have to claim the unspeakable privilege of bearing in himself the image of a perfect being?
Moreover, if intelligence, which is the faculty7 of comparing, of judging, of rectifying8 errors, of learning, does not constitute individual perfectibility, what can constitute it?
And if the union of all individual perfectibilities, especially among beings capable of communicating to each other their acquisitions, does not afford a guarantee for collective perfectibility, we must renounce9 all philosophy and all moral and political science.
What constitutes man’s perfectibility is his intelligence, or the [p509] faculty which has been given to him of passing from error, which is the parent of evil, to truth, which is the generating principle of good.
It is science and experience which cause man to abandon, in his mind, error for truth, and afterwards, in his conduct, evil for good; it is the discovery which he makes, in phenomena10 and in acts, of effects which he had not suspected.
But to enable him to acquire this science, he must have an interest in acquiring it. In order that he should profit by this experience, he must have an interest in profiting by it. It is in the law of responsibility, then, that we must search for the means of realizing human perfectibility.
And as we can form no idea of responsibility apart from liberty; as acts which are not voluntary can afford neither instruction nor available experience; as beings capable of being improved or deteriorated11 by the exclusive action of external causes without the participation12 of choice, reflection, or free will (although this happens in the case of unconscious organized matter), could not be called perfectible, in the moral acceptation of the word, we must conclude that liberty is the very essence of progress. To impair13 man’s liberty is not only to hurt and degrade him; it is to change his nature; it is (in the measure and proportion in which such oppression is exercised) to render him incapable14 of improvement; it is to despoil15 him of his resemblance to the Creator; it is to dim and deaden in his noble nature that vital spark which glowed there from the beginning.
But in thus proclaiming aloud our fixed16 and unalterable belief in human perfectibility, and in progress, which is necessary in every sense, and which, by a marvellous correspondence, is as much more active in one direction as it is more active in all others, we must not be regarded as indulging in Utopianism, or be considered as optimists17, believing “all to be for the best, in the best of worlds,” and expecting the immediate18 arrival of the millennium19.
Alas20! when we turn our regards on the world as it is, and see around us the enormous amount of mud and meanness, suffering and complaint, vice21 and crime, which still exist,—when we reflect on the moral action exerted on society by the classes who ought to point out to the lagging multitude the way to the New Jerusalem,—when we ask ourselves what use the rich make of their fortune, the poets of their genius, philosophers of their scientific lucubrations, journalists of the ministry22 with which they are invested, high functionaries23, ministers of state, representatives of the people, kings, of the power which fate has placed in their hands,—when [p510] we witness revolutions like that which has recently agitated24 Europe, and in which each man seems to be in search of what must in the long-run prove fatal to himself and to society at large,—when we see cupidity25 in all shapes and among all ranks, the constant sacrifice of the interests of others to our own selfish interest, and of the future to the present,—when we see that great and inevitable26 moving spring of the human race, personal interest, still making its appearance only in manifestations27 the most material and the most improvident,—when we see the working classes, preyed28 upon by the parasitism29 of public functionaries, rise up in revolutionary convulsions, not against this withering30 parasitism, but against wealth legitimately31 acquired, that is to say, against the very element of their own deliverance and the principle of their own right and force,—when such spectacles present themselves to us on all sides, we get afraid of ourselves, we tremble for our faith in human perfectibility, the light would seem to waver, and be on the eve of extinction32, leaving us in the fearful darkness of Pessimism33.
But no—there is no ground for despair. Whatever be the impressions which too recent circumstances have made upon us, humanity still moves onward34. What causes the illusion is that we measure the life of nations by the short span of our own individual lives; and because a few years are a long period for us, we imagine them also a long period for them. But even adopting this inadequate35 measure, the progress of society on all sides is visible. I need scarcely remind you of the marvels36 which have already been accomplished37 in what concerns material advantages, the improved salubrity of towns, and in the means of locomotion38 and communication, etc.
In a political point of view, has the French nation gained no experience? Who dares affirm that had all the difficulties through which we have just passed presented themselves half a century ago, or sooner, France would have overcome them with as much ability, prudence39, and wisdom, and with so few sacrifices? I write these lines in a country which has been fertile in revolutions. Florence used to have a rising every five years, and at each rising one-half of her citizens robbed and murdered the other half. Had we only a little more imagination—not that which creates, invents, and assumes facts, but that which recalls them and brings them to mind—we should be more just to our times and to our contemporaries! What remains40 true, and it is a truth which no one can know better than an Economist41, is this, that human progress, especially in its dawn, is excessively slow, so very slow as to give rise to despair in the heart of the philanthropist. . . . . [p511]
Men whose genius invests them with the power of the press ought, it seems to me, to regard things more nearly, before scattering42 amidst the social fermentation discouraging speculations43 which imply for humanity the alternative of two modes of degradation44.
We have already seen some examples of this, when treating of population, of rent, of machinery45, of the division of inheritance, etc.
Here is another, taken from M. de Chateaubriand, who merely formulates46 a fashionable conventionalism: “The corruption48 of morals and the civilisation49 of nations march abreast50. If the last present means of liberty, the first is an inexhaustible source of slavery.”
It is beyond doubt that civilisation presents means of liberty, and it is equally beyond doubt that corruption is a source of slavery. That which is doubtful, more than doubtful,—and what for my own part I deny solemnly and formally,—is this, that civilisation and corruption march abreast. If it were so, a fatal equilibrium51 would be established between the means of liberty and the sources of slavery; and immobility would be the fate of the human race.
There cannot, moreover, enter into the human heart a thought more melancholy52, more discouraging, more desolating53, a thought more fitted to urge us to despair, to irreligion, to impiety54, to blasphemy55, than this, that every human being, whether he wills it or not, whether he doubts it or not, proceeds on the road of civilisation—and civilisation is corruption!
Then, if all civilisation be corruption, wherein consist its advantages? It is impossible to pretend that civilisation is unattended with moral, intellectual, and material advantages, for then it would cease to be civilisation. As Chateaubriand employs the term, civilisation signifies material progress, an increase of population, of wealth, of prosperity, the development of intelligence, the advancement56 of the sciences; and all these steps of progress imply, according to him, a corresponding retrogression of the moral sense.
This were enough to tempt57 men to a wholesale58 suicide; for I repeat that material and intellectual progress is not of our preparation and ordination59. God himself has decreed it, in giving us expansible desires and improvable faculties60. We are urged on to it without wishing it, without knowing it,—Chateaubriand, and his equals, if he has any, more than any one else. And this progress is to sink us deeper and deeper into immorality61 and slavery, by means of corruption. . . . . . . [p512]
I thought at first that Chateaubriand had let slip an unguarded phrase, as poets frequently do, without examining it too narrowly. With that class of writers, sound sometimes runs away with sense. Provided the antithesis62 is symmetrical, what matters it that the thought be false or objectionable? Provided the metaphor63 produces its intended effect, that it has an air of inspiration and depth, that it secures the applause of the public, and enables the author to pass for an oracle64, of what importance are exactitude and truth?
I had thought, then, that Chateaubriand, giving way to a momentary65 excess of misanthropy, had allowed himself to formulate47 a conventionalism, a vulgarism dragged from the kennel66. “Civilisation and corruption march abreast,” is a phrase that has been repeated since the days of Heraclitus, but it is not more true on that account.
At a distance of several years, however, the same great writer has reproduced the same thought, and in a more didactic form; which shows that it expressed his deliberate opinion. It is proper to combat it, not because it comes from Chateaubriand, but because it has got abroad, and so generally prevails.
“The material condition is ameliorated,” he says, “intellectual progress advances, and nations, in place of profiting, decay. Here is the explanation of the decay of society and the growth of the individual. Had the moral sense been developed in proportion to the development of intelligence, there would have been a counter weight, and the human race would have grown greater without danger. But it is just the contrary which happens. The perception of good and evil is obscured in proportion as intelligence is enlightened; conscience becomes narrowed in proportion as ideas are enlarged.”—Mémoires d’Outre-Tombe, vol. xi.
点击
收听单词发音
收听单词发音 |
1
effulgence
|
|
| n.光辉 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
2
domain
|
|
| n.(活动等)领域，范围；领地，势力范围 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
3
chastisement
|
|
| n.惩罚 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
4
lessening
|
|
| 减轻，减少，变小 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
5
scrutinize
|
|
| n.详细检查，细读 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
6
stationary
|
|
| adj.固定的，静止不动的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
7
faculty
|
|
| n.才能；学院，系；(学院或系的)全体教学人员 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
8
rectifying
|
|
| 改正，矫正( rectify的现在分词 )； 精馏； 蒸流； 整流 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
9
renounce
|
|
| v.放弃；拒绝承认，宣布与…断绝关系 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
10
phenomena
|
|
| n.现象 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
11
deteriorated
|
|
| 恶化，变坏( deteriorate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
12
participation
|
|
| n.参与，参加，分享 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
13
impair
|
|
| v.损害，损伤；削弱，减少 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
14
incapable
|
|
| adj.无能力的，不能做某事的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
15
despoil
|
|
| v.夺取，抢夺 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
16
fixed
|
|
| adj.固定的，不变的，准备好的；(计算机)固定的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
17
optimists
|
|
| n.乐观主义者( optimist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
18
immediate
|
|
| adj.立即的；直接的，最接近的；紧靠的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
19
millennium
|
|
| n.一千年，千禧年；太平盛世 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
20
alas
|
|
| int.唉(表示悲伤、忧愁、恐惧等) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
21
vice
|
|
| n.坏事；恶习；[pl.]台钳，老虎钳；adj.副的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
22
ministry
|
|
| n.(政府的)部；牧师 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
23
functionaries
|
|
| n.公职人员，官员( functionary的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
24
agitated
|
|
| adj.被鼓动的，不安的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
25
cupidity
|
|
| n.贪心，贪财 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
26
inevitable
|
|
| adj.不可避免的，必然发生的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
27
manifestations
|
|
| n.表示，显示（manifestation的复数形式） | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
28
preyed
|
|
| v.掠食( prey的过去式和过去分词 )；掠食；折磨；（人）靠欺诈为生 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
29
parasitism
|
|
| n.寄生状态，寄生病；寄生性 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
30
withering
|
|
| 使人畏缩的，使人害羞的，使人难堪的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
31
legitimately
|
|
| ad.合法地；正当地，合理地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
32
extinction
|
|
| n.熄灭，消亡，消灭，灭绝，绝种 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
33
pessimism
|
|
| n.悲观者，悲观主义者，厌世者 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
34
onward
|
|
| adj.向前的，前进的；adv.向前，前进，在先 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
35
inadequate
|
|
| adj.(for,to)不充足的，不适当的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
36
marvels
|
|
| n.奇迹( marvel的名词复数 )；令人惊奇的事物（或事例）；不平凡的成果；成就v.惊奇，对…感到惊奇( marvel的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
37
accomplished
|
|
| adj.有才艺的；有造诣的；达到了的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
38
locomotion
|
|
| n.运动，移动 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
39
prudence
|
|
| n.谨慎，精明，节俭 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
40
remains
|
|
| n.剩余物，残留物；遗体，遗迹 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
41
economist
|
|
| n.经济学家，经济专家，节俭的人 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
42
scattering
|
|
| n.[物]散射；散乱，分散；在媒介质中的散播adj.散乱的；分散在不同范围的；广泛扩散的；（选票）数量分散的v.散射(scatter的ing形式)；散布；驱散 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
43
speculations
|
|
| n.投机买卖( speculation的名词复数 )；思考；投机活动；推断 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
44
degradation
|
|
| n.降级；低落；退化；陵削；降解；衰变 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
45
machinery
|
|
| n.(总称)机械，机器；机构 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
46
formulates
|
|
| v.构想出( formulate的第三人称单数 )；规划；确切地阐述；用公式表示 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
47
formulate
|
|
| v.用公式表示；规划；设计；系统地阐述 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
48
corruption
|
|
| n.腐败，堕落，贪污 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
49
civilisation
|
|
| n.文明，文化，开化，教化 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
50
abreast
|
|
| adv.并排地；跟上(时代)的步伐，与…并进地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
51
equilibrium
|
|
| n.平衡，均衡，相称，均势，平静 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
52
melancholy
|
|
| n.忧郁，愁思；adj.令人感伤（沮丧）的，忧郁的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
53
desolating
|
|
| 毁坏( desolate的现在分词 )； 极大地破坏； 使沮丧； 使痛苦 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
54
impiety
|
|
| n.不敬；不孝 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
55
blasphemy
|
|
| n.亵渎，渎神 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
56
advancement
|
|
| n.前进，促进，提升 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
57
tempt
|
|
| vt.引诱，勾引，吸引，引起…的兴趣 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
58
wholesale
|
|
| n.批发；adv.以批发方式；vt.批发，成批出售 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
59
ordination
|
|
| n.授任圣职 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
60
faculties
|
|
| n.能力( faculty的名词复数 )；全体教职员；技巧；院 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
61
immorality
|
|
| n. 不道德, 无道义 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
62
antithesis
|
|
| n.对立；相对 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
63
metaphor
|
|
| n.隐喻，暗喻 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
64
oracle
|
|
| n.神谕，神谕处，预言 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
65
momentary
|
|
| adj.片刻的，瞬息的；短暂的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
66
kennel
|
|
| n.狗舍，狗窝 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
| 欢迎访问英文小说网 |