—A partial prohibition2.
—What is prohibition?
—An absolute restriction.
—So that what is said of one is true of the other?
—Yes, comparatively. They bear the same relation to each other that the arc of the circle does to the circle.
—Then if prohibition is bad, restriction cannot be good.
—No more than the arc can be straight if the circle is curved.
—What is the common name for restriction and prohibition?
—Protection.
—What is the definite effect of protection?
—Why are men so attached to the protective system?
—Because, since liberty would accomplish the same result with less labor, this apparent diminution4 of labor frightens them.
—Why do you say apparent?
—What?
—That cannot and need not be determined8.
—Why?
—Because, if the total of the comforts of France could be gained with a diminution of one-tenth on the total of its labor, no one could determine what comforts it would procure9 with the labor remaining at its disposal. One person would prefer to be better clothed, another better fed, another better taught, and another more amused.
—Explain the workings and effect of protection.
—It is not an easy matter. Before taking hold of a complicated instance, it must be studied in the simplest one.
—Take the simplest you choose.
—Yes. He cut down a tree, and then with his ax hewed12 the trunk on both sides until he got it down to the thickness of a board.
—And that gave him an abundance of work?
—Fifteen full days.
—What did he live on during this time?
—His provisions.
—What happened to the ax?
—It was all blunted.
—Very good; but there is one thing which, perhaps, you do not know. At the moment that Robinson gave the first blow with his ax, he saw a plank which the waves had cast up on the shore.
—Oh, the lucky accident! He ran to pick it up?
—It was his first impulse; but he checked himself, reasoning thus:
"If I go after this plank, it will cost me but the labor of carrying it and the time spent in going to and returning from the shore.
"But if I make a plank with my ax, I shall in the first place obtain work for fifteen days, then I shall wear out my ax, which will give me an opportunity of repairing it, and I shall consume my provisions, which will be a third source of labor, since they must be replaced. Now, labor is wealth. It is plain that I will ruin myself if I pick up this stranded13 board. It is important to protect my personal labor, and now that I think of it, I can create myself additional labor by kicking this board back into the sea."
—But this reasoning was absurd!
—Certainly. Nevertheless it is that adopted by every nation which protects itself by prohibition. It rejects the plank which is offered it in exchange for a little labor, in order to give itself more labor. It sees a gain even in the labor of the custom house officer. This answers to the trouble which Robinson took to give back to the waves the present they wished to make him. Consider the nation a collective being, and you will not find an atom of difference between its reasoning and that of Robinson.
—Did not Robinson see that he could use the time saved in doing something else?
—What 'something else'?
—So long as one has wants and time, one has always something to do. I am not bound to specify14 the labor that he could undertake.
—I can specify very easily that which he would have avoided.
—I assert, that Robinson, with incredible blindness, confounded labor with its result, the end with the means, and I will prove it to you.
—It is not necessary. But this is the restrictive or prohibitory system in its simplest form. If it appears absurd to you, thus stated, it is because the two qualities of producer and consumer are here united in the same person.
—Let us pass, then, to a more complicated instance.
—Willingly. Some time after all this, Robinson having met Friday, they united, and began to work in common. They hunted for six hours each morning and brought home four hampers15 of game. They worked in the garden for six hours each afternoon, and obtained four baskets of vegetables.
One day a canoe touched at the Island of Despair. A good-looking stranger landed, and was allowed to dine with our two hermits16. He tasted, and praised the products of the garden, and before taking leave of his hosts, said to them:
"Generous Islanders, I dwell in a country much richer in game than this, but where horticulture is unknown. It would be easy for me to bring you every evening four hampers of game if you would give me only two baskets of vegetables."
At these words Robinson and Friday stepped on one side, to have a consultation17, and the debate which followed is too interesting not to be given in extenso:
Friday. Friend, what do you think of it?
Robinson. If we accept we are ruined.
Friday. Is that certain? Calculate!
Robinson. It is all calculated. Hunting, crushed out by competition, will be a lost branch of industry for us.
Friday. What difference does that make, if we have the game?
Robinson. Theory! It will not be the product of our labor.
Friday. Yes, it will, since we will have to give vegetables to get it.
Robinson. Then what shall we make?
Friday. The four hampers of game cost us six hours' labor. The stranger gives them to us for two baskets of vegetables, which take us but three hours. Thus three hours remain at our disposal.
Robinson. Say rather that they are taken from our activity. There is our loss. Labor is wealth, and if we lose a fourth of our time we are one-fourth poorer.
Friday. Friend, you make an enormous mistake. The same amount of game and vegetables and three free hours to boot make progress, or there is none in the world.
Friday. We will do something else.
Robinson. Ah, now I have you. You can specify nothing. It is very easy to say something else—something else.
Robinson. Utopia! Is it certain that we will do this rather than that?
Friday. Well, if we have no wants, we will rest. Is rest nothing?
Robinson. When one rests one dies of hunger.
Friday. Friend, you are in a vicious circle. I speak of a rest which diminishes neither our gains nor our vegetables. You always forget that by means of our commerce with this stranger, nine hours of labor will give us as much food as twelve now do.
Robinson. It is easy to see that you were not reared in Europe. Perhaps you have never read the Moniteur Industriel? It would have taught you this: "All time saved is a dear loss. Eating is not the important matter, but working. Nothing which we consume counts, if it is not the product of our labor. Do you wish to know whether you are rich? Do not look at your comforts, but at your trouble." This is what the Moniteur Industriel would have taught you. I, who am not a theorist, see but the loss of our hunting.
Friday. What a strange perversion20 of ideas. But—
Robinson. No buts. Besides, there are political reasons for rejecting the interested offers of this perfidious21 stranger.
Friday. Political reasons!
Robinson. Yes. In the first place he makes these offers only because they are for his advantage.
Friday. So much the better, since they are for ours also.
Robinson. Then by these exchanges we shall become dependent on him.
Friday. And he on us. We need his game, he our vegetables, and we will live in good friendship.
Robinson. Fancy! Do you want I should leave you without an answer?
Friday. Let us see; I am still waiting a good reason.
Robinson. Supposing that the stranger learns to cultivate a garden, and that his island is more fertile than ours. Do you see the consequences?
Friday. Yes. Our relations with the stranger will stop. He will take no more vegetables from us, since he can get them at home with less trouble. He will bring us no more game, since we will have nothing to give in exchange, and we will be then just where you want us to be now.
Robinson. Short-sighted savage22! You do not see that after having destroyed our hunting, by inundating23 us with game, he will kill our gardening by overwhelming us with vegetables.
Friday. But he will do that only so long as we give him something else; that is to say, so long as we find something else to produce, which will economize6 our labor.
Robinson. Something else—something else! You always come back to that. You are very vague, friend Friday; there is nothing practical in your views.
The contest lasted a long time, and, as often happens, left each one convinced that he was right. However, Robinson having great influence over Friday, his views prevailed, and when the stranger came for an answer, Robinson said to him:
"Stranger, in order that your proposition may be accepted, we must be quite sure of two things:
"The first is, that your island is not richer in game than ours, for we will struggle but with equal arms.
"The second is, that you will lose by the bargain. For, as in every exchange there is necessarily a gainer and a loser, we would be cheated, if you were not. What have you to say?".
"Nothing, nothing," replied the stranger, who burst out laughing, and returned to his canoe.
—The story would not be bad if Robinson was not so foolish.
—He is no more so than the committee in Hauteville street.
—Oh, there is a great difference. You suppose one solitary24 man, or, what comes to the same thing, two men living together. This is not our world; the diversity of occupations, and the intervention25 of merchants and money, change the question materially.
—All this complicates26 transactions, but does not change their nature.
—What! Do you propose to compare modern commerce to mere exchanges?
—Commerce is but a multitude of exchanges; the real nature of the exchange is identical with the real nature of commerce, as small labor is of the same nature with great, and as the gravitation which impels27 an atom is of the same nature as that which attracts a world.
—Thus, according to you, these arguments, which in Robinson's mouth are so false, are no less so in the mouths of our protectionists?
—Yes; only error is hidden better under the complication of circumstances.
—Well, now, select some instance from what has actually occurred.
—Very well; in France, in view of custom and the exigencies28 of the climate, cloth is an useful article. Is it the essential thing to make it, or to have it?
—A pretty question! To have it, we must make it.
—That is not necessary. It is certain that to have it some one must make it; but it is not necessary that the person or country using it should make it. You did not produce that which clothes you so well, nor France the coffee it uses for breakfast.
—But I purchased my cloth, and France its coffee.
—Exactly, and with what?
—With specie.
—But you did not make the specie, nor did France.
—We bought it.
—With what?
—With our products which went to Peru.
—Then it is in reality your labor that you exchange for cloth, and French labor that is exchanged for coffee?
—Certainly.
—Then it is not absolutely necessary to make what one consumes?
—No, if one makes something else, and gives it in exchange.
—In other words, France has two ways of procuring29 a given quantity of cloth. The first is to make it, and the second is to make something else, and exchange that something else abroad for cloth. Of these two ways, which is the best?
—I do not know.
—It seems so.
—Which is best for a nation, to have the choice of these two ways, or to have the law forbid its using one of them at the risk of rejecting the best?
—It seems to me that it would be best for the nation to have the choice, since in these matters it always makes a good selection.
—The law which prohibits the introduction of foreign cloth, decides, then, that if France wants cloth, it must make it at home, and that it is forbidden to make that something else with which it could purchase foreign cloth?
—That is true.
—And as it is obliged to make cloth, and forbidden to make something else, just because the other thing would require less labor (without which France would have no occasion to do anything with it), the law virtually decrees, that for a certain amount of labor, France shall have but one yard of cloth, making it itself, when, for the same amount of labor, it could have had two yards, by making something else.
—But what other thing?
—No matter what. Being free to choose, it will make something else only so long as there is something else to make.
—That is possible; but I cannot rid myself of the idea that the foreigners may send us cloth and not take something else, in which case we shall be prettily31 caught. Under all circumstances, this is the objection, even from your own point of view. You admit that France will make this something else, which is to be exchanged for cloth, with less labor than if it had made the cloth itself?
—Doubtless.
—Yes; but people will be no worse clothed—a little circumstance which causes the whole misunderstanding. Robinson lost sight of it, and our protectionists do not see it, or pretend not to. The stranded plank thus paralyzed for fifteen days Robinson's labor, so far as it was applied33 to the making of a plank, but it did not deprive him of it. Distinguish, then, between these two kinds of diminution of labor, one resulting in privation, and the other in comfort. These two things are very different, and if you assimilate them, you reason like Robinson. In the most complicated, as in the most simple instances, the sophism34 consists in this: Judging of the utility of labor by its duration and intensity35, and not by its results, which leads to this economic policy, a reduction of the results of labor, in order to increase its duration and intensity.
点击
收听单词发音
收听单词发音 |
1
restriction
|
|
| n.限制，约束 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
2
prohibition
|
|
| n.禁止；禁令，禁律 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
3
labor
|
|
| n.劳动，努力，工作，劳工；分娩；vi.劳动，努力，苦干；vt.详细分析；麻烦 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
4
diminution
|
|
| n.减少；变小 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
5
economized
|
|
| v.节省，减少开支( economize的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
6
economize
|
|
| v.节约，节省 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
7
devoted
|
|
| adj.忠诚的，忠实的，热心的，献身于...的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
8
determined
|
|
| adj.坚定的；有决心的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
9
procure
|
|
| vt.获得，取得，促成；vi.拉皮条 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
10
recollect
|
|
| v.回忆，想起，记起，忆起，记得 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
11
plank
|
|
| n.板条，木板，政策要点，政纲条目 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
12
hewed
|
|
| v.（用斧、刀等）砍、劈( hew的过去式和过去分词 )；砍成；劈出；开辟 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
13
stranded
|
|
| a.搁浅的，进退两难的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
14
specify
|
|
| vt.指定，详细说明 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
15
hampers
|
|
| 妨碍，束缚，限制( hamper的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
16
hermits
|
|
| （尤指早期基督教的）隐居修道士，隐士，遁世者( hermit的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
17
consultation
|
|
| n.咨询；商量；商议；会议 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
18
mere
|
|
| adj.纯粹的；仅仅，只不过 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
19
adorn
|
|
| vt.使美化，装饰 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
20
perversion
|
|
| n.曲解；堕落；反常 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
21
perfidious
|
|
| adj.不忠的，背信弃义的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
22
savage
|
|
| adj.野蛮的；凶恶的，残暴的；n.未开化的人 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
23
inundating
|
|
| v.淹没( inundate的现在分词 )；（洪水般地）涌来；充满；给予或交予（太多事物）使难以应付 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
24
solitary
|
|
| adj.孤独的，独立的，荒凉的；n.隐士 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
25
intervention
|
|
| n.介入，干涉，干预 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
26
complicates
|
|
| 使复杂化( complicate的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
27
impels
|
|
| v.推动、推进或敦促某人做某事( impel的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
28
exigencies
|
|
| n.急切需要 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
29
procuring
|
|
| v.（努力）取得， （设法）获得( procure的现在分词 )；拉皮条 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
30
fixed
|
|
| adj.固定的，不变的，准备好的；(计算机)固定的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
31
prettily
|
|
| adv.优美地；可爱地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
32
inert
|
|
| adj.无活动能力的，惰性的；迟钝的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
33
applied
|
|
| adj.应用的；v.应用，适用 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
34
sophism
|
|
| n.诡辩 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
35
intensity
|
|
| n.强烈，剧烈；强度；烈度 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
| 欢迎访问英文小说网 |