But social economy is not confined to this narrow circle. Fourierism, Saint-Simonism, communism, mysticism, sentimentalism, false philanthropy, affected3 aspirations4 to equality and chimerical5 fraternity, questions relative to luxury, to salaries, to machines, to the pretended tyranny of capital, to distant territorial6 acquisitions, to outlets7, to conquests, to population, to association, to emigration, to imposts, to loans, have encumbered8 the field of science with a host of parasitical9 sophisms, which demand the hoe and the sickle10 of the diligent11 economist12. It is not because we do not recognize the fault of this plan, or rather of this absence of plan. To attack, one by one, so many incoherent sophisms which sometimes clash, although more frequently one runs into the other, is to condemn13 one's self to a disorderly, capricious struggle, and to expose one's self to perpetual repetitions.
How much we should prefer to say simply how things are, without occupying ourselves with the thousand aspects in which the ignorant see them! To [153] explain the laws under which societies prosper14 or decay, is virtually to destroy all sophistry15 at once. When La Place had described all that can, as yet, be known of the movements of the heavenly bodies, he had dispersed16, without even naming them, all the astrological dreams of the Egyptians, Greeks, and Hindoos, much more surely than he could have done by directly refuting them through innumerable volumes. Truth is one; the book which exposes it is an imposing17 and durable18 monument:
Il brave les tyrans avides,
Plus hardi que les Pyramides
Et plus durable que l'airain.
Error is manifold, and of ephemeral duration; the work which combats it does not carry within itself a principle of greatness or of endurance.
But if the power, and perhaps the opportunity, have failed us for proceeding19 in the manner of La Place and of Say, we cannot refuse to believe that the form which we have adopted has, also, its modest utility. It appears to us especially well suited to the wants of the age, to the hurried moments which it can consecrate20 to study.
A treatise21 has, doubtless, an incontestable superiority; but upon condition that it be read, meditated22 upon, searched into. It addresses itself to a select public only. Its mission is, at first, to fix, and afterwards to enlarge, the circle of acquired knowledge.
The refutation of vulgar prejudices could not carry with it this high bearing. It aspires24 only to disencumber the route before the march of truth, to prepare the [154] mind, to reform public opinion, to blunt dangerous tools in improper25 hands. It is in social economy above all, that these hand-to-hand struggles, these constantly recurring26 combats with popular errors, have a true practical utility.
We might arrange the sciences under two classes. The one, strictly27, can be known to philosophers only. They are those whose application demands a special occupation. The public profit by their labor28, despite their ignorance of them. They do not enjoy the use of a watch the less, because they do not understand mechanics and astronomy. They are not the less carried along by the locomotive and the steamboat through their faith in the engineer and the pilot. We walk according to the laws of equilibrium29 without being acquainted with them.
But there are sciences which exercise upon the public an influence proportionate with the light of the public itself, not from knowledge accumulated in a few exceptional heads, but from that which is diffused30 through the general understanding. Such are morals, hygiene31, social economy, and in countries which men belong to themselves, politics. It is of these sciences, above all, that Bentham might have said: "That which spreads them is worth more than that which advances them." Of what consequence is it that a great man, a God even, should have promulgated32 moral laws, so long as men, imbued33 with false notions, take virtues34 for vices35, and vices for virtues? Of what value is it that Smith, Say, and, according to Chamans, economists36 of all schools, have proclaimed the superiority of liberty to restraint in commercial transactions, if those [155] who make the laws and those for whom the laws are made, are convinced to the contrary.
These sciences, which are well named social, have this peculiarity37: that for the very reason that they are of a general application, no one confesses himself ignorant of them. Do we wish to decide a question in chemistry or geometry? No one pretends to have the knowledge instinctively38; we are not ashamed to consult Draper; we make no difficulty about referring to Euclid.
But in social science authority is but little recognized. As such a one has to do daily with morals, good or bad, with hygiene, with economy, with politics reasonable or absurd, each one considers himself skilled to comment, discuss, decide, and dogmatize in these matters.
Are you ill? There is no good nurse who does not tell you, at the first moment, the cause and cure of your malady39.
But what are humors? and are these humors?
She does not trouble herself about that. I involuntarily think of this good nurse when I hear all social evils explained by these common phrases: "It is the superabundance of products, the tyranny of capital, industrial plethora," and other idle stories of which we cannot even say: verba et voces pr?tereaque nihil: for they are also fatal mistakes.
From what precedes, two things result—
1st. That the social sciences must abound41 in sophistry much more than the other sciences, because in them each one consults his own judgment42 or instinct alone.
[156]
2d. That in these sciences sophistry is especially injurious, because it misleads public opinion where opinion is a power—that is, law.
Two sorts of books, then, are required by these sciences; those which expound43 them, and those which propagate them; those which show the truth, and those which combat error.
It appears to us that the inherent defect in the form of this little Essay—repetition—is that which constitutes its principal value.
In the question we have treated, each sophism1 has, doubtless, its own set form, and its own range, but all have one common root, which is, "forgetfulness of the interests of man, insomuch as they forget the interests of consumers." To show that the thousand roads of error conduct to this generating sophism, is to teach the public to recognize it, to appreciate it—to distrust it under all circumstances.
We have no expectation that in laying down the book, the reader shall exclaim: "I know." Please Heaven he may be induced to say, "I am ignorant."
"Effort without Result no longer seems to me so desirable as Result without Effort."
"It may probably be true that the secret of commerce does not consist, as that of arms does, in giving and not receiving, according to the definition which the duellist48 in the play gives of it."
[157]
"I consider an article is increased in value by passing through several processes of manufacture; but, in exchange, do two equal values cease to be equal because the one comes from the plough and the other from the power-loom?"
"I confess that I begin to think it singular that humanity should be ameliorated by shackles49, or enriched by taxes: and, frankly50, I should be relieved of a heavy weight, I should experience a pure joy, if I could see demonstrated, which the author assures us of, that there is no incompatibility51 between comfort and justice, between peace and liberty, between the extension of labor and the progress of intelligence."
"So, without feeling satisfied by his arguments, to which I do not know whether to give the name of reasoning or of objections, I will interrogate52 the masters of the science."
Let us terminate by a last and important observation this monograph53 of sophisms. The world does not know, as it ought, the influence which sophistry exerts upon it. If we must say what we think, when the Right of the Strongest was dethroned, sophistry placed the empire in the Right of the Most Cunning; and it would be difficult to say which of these two tyrants54 has been the more fatal to humanity.
Men have an immoderate love for pleasure, influence, position, power—in one word, for wealth.
And at the same time men are impelled55 by a powerful impulse to procure56 these things at the expense of another. But this other, which is the public, has an inclination57 [158] not less strong to keep what it has acquired, provided it can and knows how. Spoliation, which plays so large a part in the affairs of the world, has, then, two agents only: Strength and Cunning; and two limits: Courage and Right.
Power applied58 to spoliation forms the groundwork of human savagism. To retrace59 its history would be to reproduce almost entire the history of all nations—Assyrians, Babylonians, Medes, Persians, Egyptians, Greeks, Romans, Goths, Franks, Huns, Turks, Arabs, Moguls, Tartars—without counting that of the Spaniards in America, the English in India, the French in Africa, the Russians in Asia, etc., etc.
But, at least, among civilized60 nations, the men who produce wealth have become sufficiently61 numerous and sufficiently strong to defend it.
Is that to say that they are no longer despoiled62? By no means; they are robbed as much as ever, and, what is more, they despoil63 one another. The agent alone is changed; it is no longer by violence, but by stratagem64, that the public wealth is seized upon.
In order to rob the public, it must be deceived. To deceive it, is to persuade it that it is robbed for its own advantage; it is to make it accept fictitious65 services, and often worse, in exchange for its property. Hence sophistry, economical sophistry, political sophistry, and financial sophistry—and, since force is held in check, sophistry is not only an evil, it is the parent of other evils. So it becomes necessary to hold it in check, in its turn, and for this purpose to render the public more acute than the cunning; just as it has become more peaceful than the strong.
The End
The End
点击收听单词发音
1 sophism | |
n.诡辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 misuse | |
n.误用,滥用;vt.误用,滥用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 affected | |
adj.不自然的,假装的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 aspirations | |
强烈的愿望( aspiration的名词复数 ); 志向; 发送气音; 发 h 音 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 chimerical | |
adj.荒诞不经的,梦幻的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 territorial | |
adj.领土的,领地的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 outlets | |
n.出口( outlet的名词复数 );经销店;插座;廉价经销店 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 encumbered | |
v.妨碍,阻碍,拖累( encumber的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 parasitical | |
adj. 寄生的(符加的) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 sickle | |
n.镰刀 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 diligent | |
adj.勤勉的,勤奋的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 economist | |
n.经济学家,经济专家,节俭的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 condemn | |
vt.谴责,指责;宣判(罪犯),判刑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 prosper | |
v.成功,兴隆,昌盛;使成功,使昌隆,繁荣 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 sophistry | |
n.诡辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 dispersed | |
adj. 被驱散的, 被分散的, 散布的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 imposing | |
adj.使人难忘的,壮丽的,堂皇的,雄伟的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 durable | |
adj.持久的,耐久的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 proceeding | |
n.行动,进行,(pl.)会议录,学报 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 consecrate | |
v.使圣化,奉…为神圣;尊崇;奉献 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 treatise | |
n.专著;(专题)论文 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 meditated | |
深思,沉思,冥想( meditate的过去式和过去分词 ); 内心策划,考虑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 aspire | |
vi.(to,after)渴望,追求,有志于 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 aspires | |
v.渴望,追求( aspire的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 improper | |
adj.不适当的,不合适的,不正确的,不合礼仪的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 recurring | |
adj.往复的,再次发生的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 strictly | |
adv.严厉地,严格地;严密地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 labor | |
n.劳动,努力,工作,劳工;分娩;vi.劳动,努力,苦干;vt.详细分析;麻烦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 equilibrium | |
n.平衡,均衡,相称,均势,平静 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 diffused | |
散布的,普及的,扩散的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 hygiene | |
n.健康法,卫生学 (a.hygienic) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 promulgated | |
v.宣扬(某事物)( promulgate的过去式和过去分词 );传播;公布;颁布(法令、新法律等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 imbued | |
v.使(某人/某事)充满或激起(感情等)( imbue的过去式和过去分词 );使充满;灌输;激发(强烈感情或品质等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 virtues | |
美德( virtue的名词复数 ); 德行; 优点; 长处 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 vices | |
缺陷( vice的名词复数 ); 恶习; 不道德行为; 台钳 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 economists | |
n.经济学家,经济专家( economist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 peculiarity | |
n.独特性,特色;特殊的东西;怪癖 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 instinctively | |
adv.本能地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 malady | |
n.病,疾病(通常做比喻) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 purged | |
清除(政敌等)( purge的过去式和过去分词 ); 涤除(罪恶等); 净化(心灵、风气等); 消除(错事等)的不良影响 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 abound | |
vi.大量存在;(in,with)充满,富于 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 judgment | |
n.审判;判断力,识别力,看法,意见 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 expound | |
v.详述;解释;阐述 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 delusive | |
adj.欺骗的,妄想的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 scarcity | |
n.缺乏,不足,萧条 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 edified | |
v.开导,启发( edify的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 obstruction | |
n.阻塞,堵塞;障碍物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 duellist | |
n.决斗者;[体]重剑运动员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 shackles | |
手铐( shackle的名词复数 ); 脚镣; 束缚; 羁绊 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 frankly | |
adv.坦白地,直率地;坦率地说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 incompatibility | |
n.不兼容 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 interrogate | |
vt.讯问,审问,盘问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 monograph | |
n.专题文章,专题著作 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 tyrants | |
专制统治者( tyrant的名词复数 ); 暴君似的人; (古希腊的)僭主; 严酷的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 impelled | |
v.推动、推进或敦促某人做某事( impel的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 procure | |
vt.获得,取得,促成;vi.拉皮条 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 inclination | |
n.倾斜;点头;弯腰;斜坡;倾度;倾向;爱好 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 applied | |
adj.应用的;v.应用,适用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 retrace | |
v.折回;追溯,探源 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60 civilized | |
a.有教养的,文雅的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61 sufficiently | |
adv.足够地,充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62 despoiled | |
v.掠夺,抢劫( despoil的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63 despoil | |
v.夺取,抢夺 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64 stratagem | |
n.诡计,计谋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65 fictitious | |
adj.虚构的,假设的;空头的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |