There must have been some magical influence in the Old Manse or in its surrounding scenery, to have stimulated2 both Emerson’s and Hawthorne’s love of Nature to such a degree. Emerson’s eye dilates3 as he looks upon the sunshine gilding4 the trunks of the balm of Gilead trees on his avenue; and Hawthorne dwells with equal delight on the luxuriant squash vines which spread over his vegetable garden. Discoursing5 on this he says:
“Speaking of summer squashes, I must say a word of their beautiful and varied6 forms. They presented an endless diversity of urns7 and vases, shallow or deep, scalloped or plain, molded in patterns which a sculptor8 would do well to copy, since art has never invented anything more graceful9.”
And again:
“A cabbage, too—especially the early Dutch cabbage, which swells10 to a monstrous11 circumference12, until its ambitious heart often bursts asunder—is a matter to be proud of when we can claim a share with the earth and sky in producing it.”
It would seem as if no one before Hawthorne had rightly observed these common vegetables, whose external appearance is always before our eyes. He not only humanizes whatever attracts his attention, but he looks through a refining medium of his own personality. He has the gift of Midas to bring back the Golden Age for us. Who besides Homer has been able to describe a chariot-race, and who but Hawthorne could extract such poetry from a farmer’s garden?
If we compare this introductory chapter with such earlier sketches13 as “The Vision at the Fountain” and “The Toll-Gatherer’s Day,” we recognize the progress that Hawthorne has made since the first volume of “Twice Told Tales.” We are no longer reminded of the plain unpainted house on Lake Sebago. His style is not only more graceful, but has acquired greater fulness of expression, and he is evidently working in a deeper and richer vein14 of thought. Purity of expression is still his polar star, and his writing is nowhere overloaded15, but it has a warmer tone, a deeper perspective, and an atmospheric16 quality which painters call chi-aroscuro. He charms with pleasing fancies, while he penetrates17 to the soul.
Hawthorne rarely repeats himself in details, and never in designs. Two of Dickens’s most interesting novels, “Oliver Twist” and “David Copperfield,” are constructed on the same theme, but each of the studies in this collection has a distinct individuality which appeals to the reader after a fashion of its own. Each has its moral, or rather central, idea to which all its component18 parts are related, and teaches a lesson of its own, so unobtrusively that we become possessed19 of it almost unawares. Some are intensely, even tragically20, serious; others so light and airy that they seem as if woven out of gossamer22.
There are a few, however, that do not harmonize with the general tone and character of the rest,—especially “Mrs. Bull-Frog,” which Hawthorne himself confessed to having been an experiment, and which strangely enough is much more in the style of his son Julian. “Monsieur du Miroir” and “Sketches from Memory” are relics23 of his earlier writings; perhaps also “Feather-Top” and “The Procession of Life.” It would have been better perhaps if “Young Goodman Brown” had been used to light a fire at the Old Manse.
“Monsieur du Miroir” is chiefly interesting as an example of Hawthorne’s faculty24 for elaborating the most simple subject until every possible phase of it has been exhausted25. It may also throw some light scientifically on the origin of consciousness. We see ourselves reflected not only in the mirror, but on the blade of a knife, or a puddle26 in the road; and, if we look sharply enough, in the eyes of other men—even in the expression of their faces. In such manner does Nature force upon us a recognition of our various personalities—the nucleus27 of self-knowledge, and self-respect.
Whittier once spoke28 of “Young Goodman Brown” as indicating a mental peculiarity30 in Hawthorne, which like the cuttle-fish rarely rises to the surface. The plot is cynical31, and largely enigmatical. The very name of it (in the way Hawthorne develops the story) is a fearful satire32 on human nature. He may have intended this for an exposure of the inconsistency, and consequent hypocrisy33, of Puritanism; but the name of Goodman Brown’s wife is Faith, and this suggests that Brown may have been himself intended for an incarnation of doubt, or disbelief carried to a logical extreme. Whatever may have been Hawthorne’s design, the effect is decidedly unpleasant.
Emerson talked in proverbs, and Hawthorne in parables34. The finest sketches in this collection are parables. “The Birth Mark,” “Rappacini’s Daughter,” “A select Party,” “Egotism,” and “The Artist of the Beautiful.” “The Celestial35 Railroad” is an allegory, a variation on “Pilgrim’s Progress.”
“The Birth Mark” and “Rappacini’s Daughter” are like divergent lines, which originate at an single point; and that point is the radical36 viciousness of trying experiments on human beings. It is bad enough, although excusable, to vivisect dogs and rabbits; but why should we attempt the same course of procedure with those that are nearest and dearest to us? Such parables were not required in the time of Tiberius C?sar and men and women grew up in a natural, vigorous manner; but now we have become so scientific that we continually attempt to improve on Nature,—like the artist who left the rainbow out of his picture of Niagara because its colors did not harmonize with the background.
The line of divergence38 in “The Birth Mark” is indicated by its name. We all have our birth-marks,—traits of character, which may be temporarily suppressed, or relegated39 to the background, but which cannot be eradicated40 and are certain to reappear at unguarded moments, or on exceptional occasions. Education and culture can do much to soften41 and temper the disposition42, but the original material remains43 the same. The father who attempts to force his son into a mode of life for which Nature did not intend him, or the mother who quarrels with her daughter’s friends, commits an error similar to that of Hawthorne’s alchemist, who endeavors to remove the birthmark from the otherwise beautiful face of his wife, but only succeeds in effecting this together with her death. The tragical21 termination of the alchemist’s experiments, the pathetic yielding up of life by his sweet “Clytie,” is described with an impressive tenderness. She sinks to her last sleep without a murmur44 of reproach.
“Rappacini’s Daughter” might serve as a protest against bringing up children in an exceptional and abnormal manner. I once knew an excellent lady, who, with the best possible intentions, brought up her daughter to be different from all other girls. As a consequence, she was different,—could not assimilate herself to others. She had no admirers, or young friends of her own sex, for there were few points of contact between herself and general society. Her mother was her only friend. She aged45 rapidly and died early. Similarly, a boy brought up in a secluded46 condition of purity and ignorance, finally developed into one of the most vicious of men.
Hawthorne has prefigured this by a bright colored flower which sparkles like a gem47, very attractive at a distance, but exhaling48 a deadly perfume. He may not have been aware that the opium49 poppy has so brilliant a flower that it can be seen at a distance from which all other flowers are invisible. The scene of his story is placed in Italy,—the land of beauty, but also the country of poisoners. Rappacini, an old botanist50 and necromancer51, has trained up his daughter in the solitary52 companionship of this flower, from which she has acquired its peculiar29 properties. A handsome young student is induced to enter the garden, partly from curiosity and partly through the legerdemain53 of Rappacini. The student soon falls under the daughter’s influence and finds himself being gradually poisoned. A watchful54 apothecary55, who has penetrated56 the necromancer’s secret, provides the young man with an antidote57 which saves him, but deprives the maiden58 of life. She crosses the barrier which separated her from a healthy existence, and the poison reacts upon her system and kills her. The old apothecary looks out from his window, and cries, “O Rappacini! Is this the consummation of your experiment?”
The underlying59 agreement between this story and “The Birth Mark” becomes apparent when we observe that the termination of one is simply a variation upon the last scene of the other. In one instance a beautiful daughter is sacrificed by her father, and in the other a lovely wife is victimized by her husband. There have been thousands, if not millions, of such cases.
There is no other writer but Shakespeare who has portrayed60 the absolute devotion of a woman’s love with such delicacy61 of feeling and depth of sympathy as Hawthorne. In the two stories we have just considered, and also in “The Bosom62 Serpent,” this element serves, like the refrain of a Greek chorus, to give a sweet, penetrating63 undertone which reconciles us to much that would otherwise seem intolerable. The heroines in these pieces have such a close spiritual relationship that one suspects them of having been studied from the same model, and who could this have been so likely as Hawthorne’s own wife. {Footnote: Notice also the similar character of Sophia in J. Hawthorne’s “Bressant."}
The theme of “The Bosom Serpent” is a husband’s jealousy65; and it is the self-forgetful devotion of his wife that finally cures his malady66 and relieves him of his unpleasant companion. The tale ends with one of those mystifying passages which Hawthorne weaves so skilfully67, so that it is difficult to determine from the text whether there was a real serpent secreted68 under the man’s clothing, or only an imaginary one,—although we presume the latter. Francis of Verulam says, “the best fortune for a husband is for his wife to consider him wise, which she will never do if she find him jealous”; and with good reason, for if he is unreasonably69 jealous, it shows a lack of confidence in her; but mutal confidence is the well-spring from which love flows, and if the well dries up, there is an end of it.
“The select Party” is quite a relief, after this tragical trilogy. It is easy to believe that Hawthorne imagined this dream of a summer evening, while watching the great cumulus clouds, tinted70 with rose and lavender like aerial snow-mountains, floating toward the horizon. Here were true castles in the air, which he could people with shapes according to his fancy; but he chose the most common abstract conceptions, such as, the Clerk of the Weather, the Beau Ideal, Mr. So-they-say, the Coming Man, and other ubiquitous personages, whom we continually hear of, but never see. The Man of Fancy invites these and many others to a banquet in his cloud-castle, where they all converse71 and behave according to their special characters. A ripple72 of delicate humor, like the ripple made by a light summer breeze upon the calm surface of a lake, runs through the piece from the first sentence to the last; and the scene is brought to a close by the approach of a thunder-storm, which spreads consternation73 among these unsubstantial guests, much like that which takes place at a picnic under similar circumstances; and Hawthorne, with his customary mystification, leaves us in doubt as to whether they ever reached terra firma again.
There is one proverbial character, however, whom Hawthorne has omitted from this account; namely, Mr. Everybody. “What Everybody says, must be true;” but unfortunately Everybody’s information is none of the best, and his judgment74 does not rise above his information. His self-confidence, however, is enormous. He understands law better than the lawyer, and medicine better than the physicians. He is never tired of settling the affairs of the country, and of proposing constitutional amendments75. Is it not perfectly76 natural that Everybody should understand Everybody’s business as well as or better than his own? He is continually predicting future events, and if they fail to take place he predicts them again. He is omnipresent, but if you seek him he is nowhere to be found,—which we may presume to be the reason why he did not appear at the entertainment given by the Man of Fancy.
That which gives the elevated character to Raphael’s faces—as in the “Sistine Madonna” and other paintings—is not their drawing, though that is always refined, but the expression of the eyes, which are truly the windows of the soul. It was the same in Hawthorne’s face, and may be observed in all good portraits of him. An immutable77 calmness overspread his features, but in and about his eyes there was a spring-like mirthfulness; while down in the shadowy depth of those luminous78 orbs79 was concealed80 the pathos81 that formed the undercurrent of his life. So it is that high comedy, as Plato long ago observed, lies very close to tragedy.
A well-known French writer compares English humor, in a general way, to beer-drinking, and this is more particularly applicable to Dickens’s characters. The very name of Mark Tapley suggests ale bottles. Thackeray’s humor is of a more refined quality, but a trifle sharp and satirical. It is, however, pure and healthful and might be compared to Rhine-wine. Hawthorne’s humor at its best is more refined than Thackeray’s, as well as of a more amiable82 quality, and reminds one (on Taine’s principle) of those delicate Italian wines which have very little body, but a delightful83 bouquet84. As a humorist, however, Hawthorne varies in different times and places more than in any other respect. He adapts himself to his subject; is light and playful in “The select Party”; takes on a more serious vein in “The Celestial Railroad”; in his resuscitation85 of Byron, in the letter from a lunatic called “P’s Correspondence” he is simply sardonic86; and “The Virtuoso87’s Collection” has all the effect, although he does not anywhere descend88 to low comedy, of a roaring farce89. In “Mrs. Bull-Frog,” as the title intimates, he approaches closely to the grotesque90.
In “The Virtuoso’s Collection” we have the humor of impossibility. Nothing is more common than this, but Hawthorne gives it a peculiar value of his own. A procession of mythological91 objects, strange historical relics, and the odd creations of fiction passes before our eyes. The abruptness92 of their juxtaposition93 excites continuous laughter in us. It would be an extremely phlegmatic94 person who could read it with a serious face. Don Quixote’s Rosinante, Doctor Johnson’s cat, Shelley’s skylark, a live phoenix95, Prospero’s magic wand, the hard-ridden Pegasus, the dove which brought the olive branch, and many others appear in such rapid succession that the reader has no time to take breath, or to consider what will turn up next. Like an accomplished96 showman, Hawthorne enlivens the performance here and there with original reflections on life, which are perfectly dignified97, but become humorous from contrast with their surroundings. In spite of its comical effect, the piece has a very genteel air, for its material is taken from that general stock of information that passes current in cultivated families. The young man of fashion who had never heard of Elijah, or of Poe’s “Raven,” would not have understood it.
In “The Hall of Fantasy,” we catch some glimpses of Hawthorne’s favorite authors:
“The grand old countenance98 of Homer, the shrunken and decrepit99 form, but vivid face, of ?sop64, the dark presence of Dante, the wild Ariosto, Rabelais’s smile of deep-wrought mirth, the profound, pathetic humor of Cervantes, the all glorious Shakespeare, Spenser, meet guest for an allegoric structure, the severe divinity of Milton and Bunyan, molded of the homeliest clay, but instinct with celestial fire—were those that chiefly attracted my eye. Fielding, Richardson, and Scott occupied conspicuous100 pedestals.”
He also adds Goethe and Swedenborg, and remarks of them:
“Were ever two men of transcendent imagination more unlike?”
It is evident that Byron was not a favorite with Hawthorne. In addition to his severe treatment of that poet, in “P’s Correspondence,” he says in “Earth’s Holocaust,” where he imagines the works of various authors to be consumed in a bonfire:
“Speaking of the properties of flame, me-thought Shelley’s poetry emitted a purer light than almost any other productions of his day, contrasting beautifully with the fitful and lurid101 gleams and gushes102 of black vapor103 that flashed and eddied104 from the volumes of Lord Byron.”
This seems like rather puritanical105 treatment. If there are false lines in Byron, there are quite as many weak lines in Shelley. If sincerity106 were to give out a pure flame, Byron would stand that test equal to any. His real fault is to be found in his somewhat glaring diction, like the voix blanc in singing, and in an occasional stroke of persiflage107. This increases his attractiveness to youthful minds, but to a nature like Hawthorne’s anything of an exhibitory character must always be unpleasant.
Emerson and Hawthorne only knew Goethe through the translations of Dwight, Carlyle and Margaret Fuller, and yet his poetry made a deeper impression on them than on Lowell and Longfellow, who read it in the original. Hawthorne appears to have taken lessons in German while at Brook108 Farm, for we find him studying a German book at the Old Manse, with a grammar and lexicon109; but, as he confesses in his diary, without making satisfactory progress.
“The Artist of the Beautiful” is a Dantean allegory, and a poetic110 gem. A young watchmaker, imbued111 with a spirit above his calling, neglects the profits of his business in order to construct an artificial butterfly,—at once the type of useless beauty and the symbol of immortality112, and he perseveres113 in spite of the difficulties of the undertaking114 and the contemptuous opposition115 of his acquaintances. He finally succeeds in making one which seems to be almost endowed with life, but only to be informed that it is no better than a toy, and that he has wasted his time on a thing which has no practical value. A child (who represents the thoughtlessness of the great world) crushes the exquisite116 piece of workmanship in his little hand; but the watch-maker does not repine at this, for he realizes that after having achieved the beautiful, in his own spirit, the outward symbol of it has comparatively little value. The Artist of the Beautiful is Hawthorne himself; and in this exquisite fable117 he has not only unfolded the secret of all high art, but his own life-secret as well.
HAWTHORNE AND TRANSCENDENTALISM
The French and English scepticism of the eighteenth century, produced a reaction in the more contemplative German nature, which took the form of a strong assertion of spirit or mind as an entity118 in itself, and distinct from matter. This movement was more like a national impulse than the proselytism of a sect37, but the individual in whom this spiritual impulse of the German people manifested itself at that time was Immanuel Kant. Without discrediting119 the revelations of Hebrew tradition, he taught the doctrine120 that instead of looking for evidence of a Supreme121 Being in the external world, we should seek him in our own hearts; that every man could find a revelation in his own conscience,—in the consciousness of good and evil, by which man improves his condition on earth; that the ideas of a Supreme Being, or of immortality and freedom of will, are inherent in the human mind, and are not to be acquired from experience; but that, as the finite mind cannot comprehend the infinite, we cannot know God in the same sense that we know our own earthly fathers, or as Goethe afterwards expressed it,—-
“Who can say I know Him;
Who can say, I know Him not;”
and that it is in this aspiration123 for the unattainable, in this reverence124 for absolute purity, wisdom and love, that the spirit of true religion consists.
The new philosophy was named “Transcendentalism” by Kant’s followers125, because it included ideas which were beyond the range of experience. It became popular in Germany, as Platonism, to which it is closely related, became popular in ancient Greece. It has never been accepted in France, where scepticism still predominates, though we hear of it in Taine and a few other writers; but in Great Britain, although the English universities repudiated126 it, Transcendentalism became so influential127 that Gladstone has spoken of it, in his Romanes lecture, as the dominant128 philosophy of the nineteenth century. Every notable English writer of that period, with the exception of Macaulay, Mill, and Spencer, became largely imbued with it. In America its influence did not extend much beyond New England, but in that section at least its proselytes were numbered by thousands, and it effected an intellectual revolution which has since influenced the whole country.
The Concord group of transcendentalists did not accept the teaching of Kant in its original purity; but mixed with it a number of other imported products, that in no way appertain to it. Thoreau was an American sansculotte, a believer in the natural man; Ripley was mainly a socialist129; Margaret Fuller was one of the earliest leaders in woman’s rights; Alcott was a Neo-Platonist, a vegetarian130, and a non-resistant; while Emerson sympathized largely with Thoreau, and from his poetic exaltation of Nature was looked upon as a pantheist by those who were not accustomed to nice discriminations. Thus it happened that Transcendentalism came to be associated in the public mind with any exceptional mode or theory of life. Its best representatives in America, like Professor Hedge of Harvard, Reverend David A. Wasson and Doctor William T. Harris (so long Chief of the National Bureau of Education), were much abler men than Emerson’s followers, but did not attract so much attention, simply because they lived according to the customs of good society.
Sleepy Hollow, before it was converted into a cemetery131, was one of the most attractive sylvan132 resorts in the environs of Concord. It was a sort of natural amphitheatre, a small oval plane, more than half surrounded by a low wooded ridge133; a sheltered and sequestered134 spot, cool in summer, but also warm and sunny in spring, where the wild flowers bloomed and the birds sang earlier than in other places.
There, on August 22, 1842, a notable meeting took place, between Hawthorne, Emerson, and Margaret Fuller, who came that afternoon to enjoy the inspiration of the place, without preconcerted agreement. Margaret Fuller was first on the ground, and Hawthorne found her seated on the hill-side—his gravestone now overlooks the spot—reading a book with a peculiar name, which he “did not understand, and could not afterward122 recollect135.” Such a description could only apply to Kant’s “Critique of Pure Reason,” the original fountain-head and gospel of Transcendentalism.
It does not appear that Nathaniel Hawthorne ever studied “The Critique of Pure Reason.” His mind was wholly of the artistic136 order,—the most perfect type of an artist, one might say, living at that time,—and a scientific analysis of the mental faculties137 would have been as distasteful to him as the dissection138 of a human body. History, biography, fiction, did not appear to him as a logical chain of cause and effect, but as a succession of pictures illustrating139 an ideal determination of the human race. He could not even look at a group of turkeys without seeing a dramatic situation in them. In addition to this, as a true artist, he was possessed of a strong dislike for everything eccentric and abnormal; he wished for symmetry in all things, and above all in human actions; and those restless, unbalanced spirits, who attached themselves to the transcendental movement and the anti-slavery cause, were particularly objectionable to him. It has been rightly affirmed that no revolutionary movement could be carried through without the support of that ill-regulated class of persons who are always seeking they know not what, and they have their value in the community, like the rest of us; but Hawthorne was not a revolutionary character, and to his mind they appeared like so many obstacles to the peaceable enjoyment140 of life. His motto was, “Live and let live.” There are passages in his Concord diary in which he refers to the itinerant141 transcendentalist in no very sympathetic manner.
His experience at Brook Farm may have helped to deepen this feeling. There is no necessary connection between such an idyllic-socialistic experiment and a belief in the direct perception of a great First Clause; but Brook Farm was popularly supposed at that time to be an emanation of Transcendentalism, and is still largely so considered. He was wearied at Brook Farm by the philosophical142 discussions of George Ripley and his friends, and took to walking in the country lanes, where he could contemplate143 and philosophize in his own fashion,—which after all proved to be more fruitful than theirs. Having exchanged his interest in the West Roxbury Association for the Old Manse at Concord (truly a poetic bargain), he wrote the most keenly humorous of his shorter sketches, his “The Celestial Railroad,” and in it represented the dismal144 cavern145 where Bunyan located the two great enemies of true religion, the Pope and the Pagan, as now occupied by a German giant, the Transcendentalist, who “makes it his business to seize upon honest travellers and fat them for his table with plentiful146 meals of smoke, mist, moonshine, raw potatoes, and sawdust.”
That Transcendentalism was largely associated in Hawthorne’s mind with the unnecessary discomforts147 and hardships of his West Roxbury life is evident from a remark which he lets fall in “The Virtuoso’s Collection.” The Virtuoso calls his attention to the seven-league boots of childhood mythology148, and Hawthorne replies, “I could show you quite as curious a pair of cowhide boots at the transcendental community of Brook Farm.” Yet there could have been no malice149 in his satire, for Mrs. Hawthorne’s two sisters, Mrs. Mann and Miss Peabody, were both transcendentalists; and so was Horace Mann himself, so far as we know definitely in regard to his metaphysical creed150. Do not we all feel at times that the search for abstract truth is like a diet of sawdust or Scotch151 mist,—a “chimera buzzing in a vacuum”?
James Russell Lowell similarly attacked Emerson in his Class Day poem, and afterward became converted to Emerson’s views through the influence of Maria White. It is possible that a similar change took place in Hawthorne’s consciousness; although his consciousness was so profound and his nature so reticent152 that what happened in the depths of it was never indicated by more than a few bubbles at the surface. He was emphatically an idealist, as every truly great artist must be, and Transcendentalism was the local costume which ideality wore in Hawthorne’s time. He was a philosopher after a way of his own, and his reflections on life and manners often have the highest value. It was inevitable153 that he should feel and assimilate something from the wave of German thought which was sweeping154 over England and America, and if he did this unconsciously it was so much the better for the quality of his art.
There are evidences of this even among his earliest sketches. In his account of “Sunday at Home” he says: “Time—where a man lives not—what is it but Eternity155?” Does he not recognize in this condensed statement Kant’s theorem that time is a mental condition, which only exists in man, and for man, and has no place in the external world? In fact, it only exists by divisions of time, and it is man who makes the divisions. The rising of the sun does not constitute time; for the sun is always rising—somewhere. The positivists and Herbert Spencer deny this, and argue to prove that time is an external entity—independent of man—like electricity; but Hawthorne did not agree with them. He evidently trusted the validity of his consciousness. In that exquisite pastoral, “The Vision at the Fountain,” he says:
“We were aware of each other’s presence, not by sight or sound or touch, but by an inward consciousness. Would it not be so among the dead?”
You have probably heard of the German who attempted to evolve a camel out of his inner consciousness. That and similar jibes156 are common among those persons of whom the Scriptures157 tell us that they are in the habit of straining at gnats158; but Hawthorne believed consciousness to be a trustworthy guide. Why should he not? It was the consciousness of self that raised man above the level of the brute160. This was the rock from which Moses struck forth161 the fountain of everlasting162 life.
Again, in “Fancy’s Show-Box” we meet with the following:
“Or, while none but crimes perpetrated are cognizable before an earthly tribunal, will guilty thoughts,—of which guilty deeds are no more than shadows,—will these draw down the full weight of a condemning163 sentence in the supreme court of eternity?”
Is this not an induction164 from or corollary to the preceding? If it is not Kantian philosophy, it is certainly Goethean. Margaret Fuller was the first American critic, if not the first of all critics, to point out that Goethe in writing “Elective Affinities” designed to show that an evil thought may have consequences as serious and irremediable as an evil action—in addition to the well-known homily that evil thoughts lead to evil actions. In his “Hall of Fantasy” Hawthorne mentions Goethe and Swedenborg as two literary idols165 of the present time who may be expected to endure through all time. Emerson makes the same prediction in one of his poems.
In “Rappacini’s Daughter” Hawthorne says: “There is something truer and more real than what we can see with the eyes and touch with the finger.”
And in “The select Party” he remarks: “To such beholders it was unreal because they lacked the imaginative faith. Had they been worthy159 to pass within its portals, they would have recognized the truth that the dominions166 which the spirit conquers for itself among unrealities become a thousand times more real than the earth whereon they stamp their feet, saying, ‘This is solid and substantial! This may be called a fact!’”
The essence of Transcendentalism is the assertion of the indestructibility of spirit, that mind is more real than matter, and the unseen than the seen. “The visible has value only,” says Carlyle, “when it is based on the invisible.” No writer of the nineteenth century affirms this more persistently167 than Hawthorne, and in none of his romances is the principle so conspicuous as in “The House of the Seven Gables.” It is a sister’s love which, like a cord stronger than steel, binds168 together the various incidents of the story, while the avaricious169 Judge Pyncheon, “with his landed estate, public honors, offices of trust and other solid unrealities,” has after all only succeeded in building a card castle for himself, which may be dissipated by a single breath. Holgrave, the daguerreotypist, who serves as a contrast to the factitious judge, is a genuine character, and may stand for a type of the young New England liberal of 1850: a freethinker, and so much of a transcendentalist that we suspect Hawthorne’s model for him to have been one of the younger associates of the Brook Farm experiment. He is evidently studied from life, and Hawthorne says of him:
“Altogether, in his culture and want of culture, in his crude, wild, and misty170 philosophy, and the practical experience that counteracted171 some of its tendencies; in his magnanimous zeal172 for man’s welfare, and his recklessness of whatever the ages had established in man’s behalf; in his faith, and in his infidelity; in what he had, and in what he lacked, the artist might fitly enough stand forth as the representative of many compeers in his native land.”
This is a fairly sympathetic portrait, and it largely represents the class of young men who went to hear Emerson and supported Charles Sumner. In the story, Holgrave achieves the reward of a veracious173 nature by winning the heart of the purest and loveliest young woman in American fiction.
If Hawthorne were still living he might object to the foregoing argument as a misrepresentation; nor could he be blamed for this, for Ripley, Thoreau, Alcott and other like visionary spirits have so vitiated the significance of Transcendentalism that it ought now to be classed among words of doubtful and uncertain meaning.
Students of German philosophy are now chiefly known as Kantists or Hegelians, and outside of the universities they are commonly classed as Emersonians.
点击收听单词发音
1 concord | |
n.和谐;协调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 stimulated | |
a.刺激的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 dilates | |
v.(使某物)扩大,膨胀,张大( dilate的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 gilding | |
n.贴金箔,镀金 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 discoursing | |
演说(discourse的现在分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 varied | |
adj.多样的,多变化的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 urns | |
n.壶( urn的名词复数 );瓮;缸;骨灰瓮 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 sculptor | |
n.雕刻家,雕刻家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 graceful | |
adj.优美的,优雅的;得体的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 swells | |
增强( swell的第三人称单数 ); 肿胀; (使)凸出; 充满(激情) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 monstrous | |
adj.巨大的;恐怖的;可耻的,丢脸的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 circumference | |
n.圆周,周长,圆周线 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 sketches | |
n.草图( sketch的名词复数 );素描;速写;梗概 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 vein | |
n.血管,静脉;叶脉,纹理;情绪;vt.使成脉络 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 overloaded | |
a.超载的,超负荷的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 atmospheric | |
adj.大气的,空气的;大气层的;大气所引起的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 penetrates | |
v.穿过( penetrate的第三人称单数 );刺入;了解;渗透 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 component | |
n.组成部分,成分,元件;adj.组成的,合成的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 possessed | |
adj.疯狂的;拥有的,占有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 tragically | |
adv. 悲剧地,悲惨地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 tragical | |
adj. 悲剧的, 悲剧性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 gossamer | |
n.薄纱,游丝 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 relics | |
[pl.]n.遗物,遗迹,遗产;遗体,尸骸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 faculty | |
n.才能;学院,系;(学院或系的)全体教学人员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 exhausted | |
adj.极其疲惫的,精疲力尽的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 puddle | |
n.(雨)水坑,泥潭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 nucleus | |
n.核,核心,原子核 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 peculiar | |
adj.古怪的,异常的;特殊的,特有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 peculiarity | |
n.独特性,特色;特殊的东西;怪癖 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 cynical | |
adj.(对人性或动机)怀疑的,不信世道向善的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 satire | |
n.讽刺,讽刺文学,讽刺作品 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 hypocrisy | |
n.伪善,虚伪 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 parables | |
n.(圣经中的)寓言故事( parable的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 celestial | |
adj.天体的;天上的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 radical | |
n.激进份子,原子团,根号;adj.根本的,激进的,彻底的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 sect | |
n.派别,宗教,学派,派系 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 divergence | |
n.分歧,岔开 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 relegated | |
v.使降级( relegate的过去式和过去分词 );使降职;转移;把…归类 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 eradicated | |
画着根的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 soften | |
v.(使)变柔软;(使)变柔和 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 disposition | |
n.性情,性格;意向,倾向;排列,部署 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 murmur | |
n.低语,低声的怨言;v.低语,低声而言 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 aged | |
adj.年老的,陈年的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 secluded | |
adj.与世隔绝的;隐退的;偏僻的v.使隔开,使隐退( seclude的过去式和过去分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 gem | |
n.宝石,珠宝;受爱戴的人 [同]jewel | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 exhaling | |
v.呼出,发散出( exhale的现在分词 );吐出(肺中的空气、烟等),呼气 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 opium | |
n.鸦片;adj.鸦片的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 botanist | |
n.植物学家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 necromancer | |
n. 巫师 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 solitary | |
adj.孤独的,独立的,荒凉的;n.隐士 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 legerdemain | |
n.戏法,诈术 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 watchful | |
adj.注意的,警惕的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 apothecary | |
n.药剂师 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 penetrated | |
adj. 击穿的,鞭辟入里的 动词penetrate的过去式和过去分词形式 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 antidote | |
n.解毒药,解毒剂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 maiden | |
n.少女,处女;adj.未婚的,纯洁的,无经验的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 underlying | |
adj.在下面的,含蓄的,潜在的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60 portrayed | |
v.画像( portray的过去式和过去分词 );描述;描绘;描画 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61 delicacy | |
n.精致,细微,微妙,精良;美味,佳肴 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62 bosom | |
n.胸,胸部;胸怀;内心;adj.亲密的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63 penetrating | |
adj.(声音)响亮的,尖锐的adj.(气味)刺激的adj.(思想)敏锐的,有洞察力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64 sop | |
n.湿透的东西,懦夫;v.浸,泡,浸湿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65 jealousy | |
n.妒忌,嫉妒,猜忌 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
66 malady | |
n.病,疾病(通常做比喻) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
67 skilfully | |
adv. (美skillfully)熟练地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
68 secreted | |
v.(尤指动物或植物器官)分泌( secrete的过去式和过去分词 );隐匿,隐藏 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
69 unreasonably | |
adv. 不合理地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
70 tinted | |
adj. 带色彩的 动词tint的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
71 converse | |
vi.谈话,谈天,闲聊;adv.相反的,相反 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
72 ripple | |
n.涟波,涟漪,波纹,粗钢梳;vt.使...起涟漪,使起波纹; vi.呈波浪状,起伏前进 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
73 consternation | |
n.大为吃惊,惊骇 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
74 judgment | |
n.审判;判断力,识别力,看法,意见 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
75 amendments | |
(法律、文件的)改动( amendment的名词复数 ); 修正案; 修改; (美国宪法的)修正案 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
76 perfectly | |
adv.完美地,无可非议地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
77 immutable | |
adj.不可改变的,永恒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
78 luminous | |
adj.发光的,发亮的;光明的;明白易懂的;有启发的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
79 orbs | |
abbr.off-reservation boarding school 在校寄宿学校n.球,天体,圆形物( orb的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
80 concealed | |
a.隐藏的,隐蔽的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
81 pathos | |
n.哀婉,悲怆 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
82 amiable | |
adj.和蔼可亲的,友善的,亲切的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
83 delightful | |
adj.令人高兴的,使人快乐的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
84 bouquet | |
n.花束,酒香 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
85 resuscitation | |
n.复活 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
86 sardonic | |
adj.嘲笑的,冷笑的,讥讽的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
87 virtuoso | |
n.精于某种艺术或乐器的专家,行家里手 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
88 descend | |
vt./vi.传下来,下来,下降 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
89 farce | |
n.闹剧,笑剧,滑稽戏;胡闹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
90 grotesque | |
adj.怪诞的,丑陋的;n.怪诞的图案,怪人(物) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
91 mythological | |
adj.神话的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
92 abruptness | |
n. 突然,唐突 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
93 juxtaposition | |
n.毗邻,并置,并列 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
94 phlegmatic | |
adj.冷静的,冷淡的,冷漠的,无活力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
95 phoenix | |
n.凤凰,长生(不死)鸟;引申为重生 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
96 accomplished | |
adj.有才艺的;有造诣的;达到了的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
97 dignified | |
a.可敬的,高贵的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
98 countenance | |
n.脸色,面容;面部表情;vt.支持,赞同 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
99 decrepit | |
adj.衰老的,破旧的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
100 conspicuous | |
adj.明眼的,惹人注目的;炫耀的,摆阔气的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
101 lurid | |
adj.可怕的;血红的;苍白的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
102 gushes | |
n.涌出,迸发( gush的名词复数 )v.喷,涌( gush的第三人称单数 );滔滔不绝地说话 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
103 vapor | |
n.蒸汽,雾气 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
104 eddied | |
起漩涡,旋转( eddy的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
105 puritanical | |
adj.极端拘谨的;道德严格的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
106 sincerity | |
n.真诚,诚意;真实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
107 persiflage | |
n.戏弄;挖苦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
108 brook | |
n.小河,溪;v.忍受,容让 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
109 lexicon | |
n.字典,专门词汇 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
110 poetic | |
adj.富有诗意的,有诗人气质的,善于抒情的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
111 imbued | |
v.使(某人/某事)充满或激起(感情等)( imbue的过去式和过去分词 );使充满;灌输;激发(强烈感情或品质等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
112 immortality | |
n.不死,不朽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
113 perseveres | |
v.坚忍,坚持( persevere的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
114 undertaking | |
n.保证,许诺,事业 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
115 opposition | |
n.反对,敌对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
116 exquisite | |
adj.精美的;敏锐的;剧烈的,感觉强烈的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
117 fable | |
n.寓言;童话;神话 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
118 entity | |
n.实体,独立存在体,实际存在物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
119 discrediting | |
使不相信( discredit的现在分词 ); 使怀疑; 败坏…的名声; 拒绝相信 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
120 doctrine | |
n.教义;主义;学说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
121 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
122 afterward | |
adv.后来;以后 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
123 aspiration | |
n.志向,志趣抱负;渴望;(语)送气音;吸出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
124 reverence | |
n.敬畏,尊敬,尊严;Reverence:对某些基督教神职人员的尊称;v.尊敬,敬畏,崇敬 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
125 followers | |
追随者( follower的名词复数 ); 用户; 契据的附面; 从动件 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
126 repudiated | |
v.(正式地)否认( repudiate的过去式和过去分词 );拒绝接受;拒绝与…往来;拒不履行(法律义务) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
127 influential | |
adj.有影响的,有权势的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
128 dominant | |
adj.支配的,统治的;占优势的;显性的;n.主因,要素,主要的人(或物);显性基因 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
129 socialist | |
n.社会主义者;adj.社会主义的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
130 vegetarian | |
n.素食者;adj.素食的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
131 cemetery | |
n.坟墓,墓地,坟场 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
132 sylvan | |
adj.森林的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
133 ridge | |
n.山脊;鼻梁;分水岭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
134 sequestered | |
adj.扣押的;隐退的;幽静的;偏僻的v.使隔绝,使隔离( sequester的过去式和过去分词 );扣押 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
135 recollect | |
v.回忆,想起,记起,忆起,记得 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
136 artistic | |
adj.艺术(家)的,美术(家)的;善于艺术创作的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
137 faculties | |
n.能力( faculty的名词复数 );全体教职员;技巧;院 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
138 dissection | |
n.分析;解剖 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
139 illustrating | |
给…加插图( illustrate的现在分词 ); 说明; 表明; (用示例、图画等)说明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
140 enjoyment | |
n.乐趣;享有;享用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
141 itinerant | |
adj.巡回的;流动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
142 philosophical | |
adj.哲学家的,哲学上的,达观的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
143 contemplate | |
vt.盘算,计议;周密考虑;注视,凝视 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
144 dismal | |
adj.阴沉的,凄凉的,令人忧郁的,差劲的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
145 cavern | |
n.洞穴,大山洞 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
146 plentiful | |
adj.富裕的,丰富的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
147 discomforts | |
n.不舒适( discomfort的名词复数 );不愉快,苦恼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
148 mythology | |
n.神话,神话学,神话集 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
149 malice | |
n.恶意,怨恨,蓄意;[律]预谋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
150 creed | |
n.信条;信念,纲领 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
151 scotch | |
n.伤口,刻痕;苏格兰威士忌酒;v.粉碎,消灭,阻止;adj.苏格兰(人)的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
152 reticent | |
adj.沉默寡言的;言不如意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
153 inevitable | |
adj.不可避免的,必然发生的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
154 sweeping | |
adj.范围广大的,一扫无遗的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
155 eternity | |
n.不朽,来世;永恒,无穷 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
156 jibes | |
n.与…一致( jibe的名词复数 );(与…)相符;相匹配v.与…一致( jibe的第三人称单数 );(与…)相符;相匹配 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
157 scriptures | |
经文,圣典( scripture的名词复数 ); 经典 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
158 gnats | |
n.叮人小虫( gnat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
159 worthy | |
adj.(of)值得的,配得上的;有价值的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
160 brute | |
n.野兽,兽性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
161 forth | |
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
162 everlasting | |
adj.永恒的,持久的,无止境的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
163 condemning | |
v.(通常因道义上的原因而)谴责( condemn的现在分词 );宣判;宣布…不能使用;迫使…陷于不幸的境地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
164 induction | |
n.感应,感应现象 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
165 idols | |
偶像( idol的名词复数 ); 受崇拜的人或物; 受到热爱和崇拜的人或物; 神像 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
166 dominions | |
统治权( dominion的名词复数 ); 领土; 疆土; 版图 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
167 persistently | |
ad.坚持地;固执地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
168 binds | |
v.约束( bind的第三人称单数 );装订;捆绑;(用长布条)缠绕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
169 avaricious | |
adj.贪婪的,贪心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
170 misty | |
adj.雾蒙蒙的,有雾的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
171 counteracted | |
对抗,抵消( counteract的过去式 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
172 zeal | |
n.热心,热情,热忱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
173 veracious | |
adj.诚实可靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |