Although English writers have so strangely neglected this important field of research, the Germans have explored it in the most exhaustive manner. The great works of Sprengel, Haeser, Baas, and Puschmann, amongst many others of the same class, sustain the claim that Germany has created the History of Medicine, whilst the well-known but incompleteviii treatise10 of Le Clerc shows what a great French writer could do to make this terra incognita interesting.
Not that Englishmen have entirely11 neglected this branch of literature. Dr. Freind, beginning with Galen’s period, wrote a History of Physic to the Commencement of the Sixteenth Century. Dr. Edward Meryon commenced a History of Medicine, of which Vol. I. only appeared (1861). In special departments Drs. Adams, Greenhill, Aikin, Munk, Wise, Royle, and others have made important contributions to the literature of the subject; but we have nothing to compare with the great German works whose authors we have mentioned above. The encyclop?dic work of Dr. Baas has been translated into English by Dr. Handerson of Cleveland, Ohio.
Sprengel’s work is translated into French, and Dr. Puschmann’s admirable volume on Medical Education has been given in English by Mr. Evan Hare.
None of these important and interesting works, valuable as they are to the professional man, are quite suitable for the general reader, who, it seems to the present writer, is entitled in these latter days to be admitted within the inner courts of the temple of Medical History, and to be permitted to trace the progress of the mystery of the Healing Art from its origin with the medicine-man to its present abode12 in our Medical Schools.
With the exception of an occasional note or brief reference in his text-books of medicine and surgery, the student of medicine has little inducement to direct his attention to the work of the great pioneers of the science he is acquiring.
One consequence of this defect in his education is manifested in the common habit of considering that all the best work of discoverers in the Healing Art has been done in our own times. “History of medicine!” exclaimed a hospital surgeon a few months since. “Why, there was none till forty years ago!” This habit of treating contemptuously the scientific and philosophical13 work of the past is due to imperfect acquaintance with, or absolute ignorance of, the splendid labours of the men of old time, and can only be remedied by devoting some little study to the records of travellers who have preceded us on the same path we are too apt to think we have constructed for ourselves. Professor Billroth declared, “that the great medical faculties14 should make it a point of honour to take care that lectures on the history of medicine are not missing in their curricula.” And at several Germanix universities some steps in this direction have been taken. In England, however—so far as I am aware—nothing of the sort has been attempted, and a young man may attain15 the highest honours of his profession without the ghost of an idea about the long and painful process through which it has become possible for him to acquire his knowledge.
Says Dr. Nathan Davis,1 “A more thorough study of the history of medicine, and in consequence, a greater familiarity with the successive steps or stages in the development of its several branches, would enable us to see more clearly the real relations and value of any new fact, induction16, or remedial agent that might be proposed. It would also enable us to avoid a common error of regarding facts, propositions, and remedies presented under new names, as really new, when they had been well known and used long before, but in connection with other names or theories.” He adds that, “The only remedy for these popular and unjust errors is a frequent recurrence17 to the standard authors of the past generation, or in other words, an honest and thorough study of the history of medicine as a necessary branch of medical education.”
In these times, when no department of science is hidden from the uninitiated, especially when medical subjects and the works of medical men are freely discussed in our great reviews and daily journals, no apology seems necessary for withdrawing the professional veil and admitting the laity18 behind the scenes of professional work.
Medicine now has no mysteries to conceal19 from the true student of nature and the scientific inquirer. Her methods and her principles are open to all who care to know them; the only passport she requires is reverence20, her only desire to satisfy the yearning21 to know. In this spirit and for these ends this work has been conceived and given to the world. “The proper study of mankind is man.”
EDWARD BERDOE.
Tynemouth House,
Victoria Park Gate,
London, April 22nd, 1893.
点击收听单词发音
1 orations | |
n.(正式仪式中的)演说,演讲( oration的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 founders | |
n.创始人( founder的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 surgical | |
adj.外科的,外科医生的,手术上的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 admiration | |
n.钦佩,赞美,羡慕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 monographs | |
n.专著,专论( monograph的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 remarkable | |
adj.显著的,异常的,非凡的,值得注意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 anthropology | |
n.人类学 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 primitive | |
adj.原始的;简单的;n.原(始)人,原始事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 savage | |
adj.野蛮的;凶恶的,残暴的;n.未开化的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 treatise | |
n.专著;(专题)论文 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 abode | |
n.住处,住所 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 philosophical | |
adj.哲学家的,哲学上的,达观的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 faculties | |
n.能力( faculty的名词复数 );全体教职员;技巧;院 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 attain | |
vt.达到,获得,完成 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 induction | |
n.感应,感应现象 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 recurrence | |
n.复发,反复,重现 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 laity | |
n.俗人;门外汉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 conceal | |
v.隐藏,隐瞒,隐蔽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 reverence | |
n.敬畏,尊敬,尊严;Reverence:对某些基督教神职人员的尊称;v.尊敬,敬畏,崇敬 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 yearning | |
a.渴望的;向往的;怀念的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |