“Father,” said Mercury, “the sport that is lacking here, may be found for us all, on earth. Look at that broad tract2 of land between the Peneus and Aliacmon. It is all alive with folks in their holiday gear, enjoying the sunshine, eating sweet melons, singing till they are hoarse3, and dancing till they are weary.”
“What then?” asked Jupiter.
“It would be rare sport, oh king of gods and men, to scatter4 all these gaily-robed revellers, and by a shower, spoil their finery.”
“Thou hast lived to little purpose in witty5 companionship, complacent6 son of Maia,” observed the Olympian, “if that be thy idea of sport. But thy thought is susceptible7 of improvement. Let that serene8 priest, who is fast asleep by the deserted9 shrine10 below, announce that a shower is2 indeed about to descend11, but that it shall wet none but fools.”
A slight sound of thunder was heard, and the aroused servant of the gods stood in front of the altar, and made the requisite12 announcement to the people. There was a philosopher close by, leaning against the door-post of his modest habitation. He no sooner heard that the impending13 storm was to wet only the fools, than he first hastily covered his head, and next hurriedly entered his dwelling14-place and shut himself up in his study. Not another individual prepared to avoid the tempest. Each man waited to see the fools drenched16, and every man there was, in two minutes, wet to the very skin.
When the sun re-appeared, the philosopher walked out into the market-place. The thoroughly17-soaked idiots, observing his comfortable condition, hailed the good man with the epithet18 of “fool.” They pelted19 him with sticks and stones, tore his gown, plucked his beard, and loaded him with foul20 terms that would have twisted the jaw21 of Aristophanes.
Bruised22, battered23, deafened24, staggering, the philosopher nevertheless contrived25 to keep his wits. “Oh, sagacious asses26!” said he to the roaring crowd, who at once sank into silence at the compliment paid to their wisdom, “have patience but for a single minute, and I will prove to you that I am not such a fool as I look.” Bending back his head, and turning the palms of his hands upwards27 to the sky, “Oh wise father,” he exclaimed, “of the witty and the witless, vouchsafe28 to send down upon me a deluge29 for my peculiar30 and individual use. Wet me to the skin even as these fools are wet. Constitute me, thereby31, as great a fool as my neighbours; and enable me, in consequence, a fool, to live at peace among fools.”
At these words, the two assemblies,—of idiots below, and of Olympians above, shook with laughter, at once loud and3 inextinguishable. Down came the shower prayed for, upon the person of the philosopher, but peculiar influences were sent down with it, and the dripping sage32 rose from his knees ten times wittier33 than he was before.
Jupiter’s beard was yet wagging with laughter, and merry tears fell from the eyelids34 of Juno, whose head lay in frolicsome35 helplessness upon the bosom36 of her hilarious37 lord,—when the latter exclaimed, “We have spoiled that good fellow’s robe, but we will also make his fortune.”
“That is already accomplished38,” remarked Juno. “I have just breathed into the ear of the chief of the district, and he is now taking the philosopher home with him, to be at once his diverter and instructor39.”
At night, as all Olympus looked down into the court of the prince, near whom, at the banquet, the wise fool lay, pouring out witty truths as fast as his lips could utter them, the gods both envied the fun and admired the wisdom. “That fellow,” cried Jupiter, “shall be the founder40 of a race. Henceforward each court shall have its fool; and fools shall be, for many a long day, the preachers and admonishers of kings. Children,” he added, to the gods and goddesses, “let us drink his health!”
The brilliant society thus addressed could neither drink nor speak, for laughing. “Dear master,” said Hebe, as she took her place behind the monarch41 of divinities, who looked at her inquiringly, “they laugh, because you did not say fools, such as he, should henceforward furnish kings with funny counsel and comic sermons.”
In the legend of the original jester, we cannot well pass over, without some brief illustration, the old, yet ever-young and especial mirth-maker of the court of Olympus itself, where Momus reigned43, the joker of the gods. Perhaps I should rather say there he was tolerated, than that there4 he reigned. For there was this difference between the sublime44 immortals45 and weaker mortals,—that the former could never take a joke from their court fool without wincing46, while the latter laughed the louder as the wit was sharper; for they wisely chose to applaud in such jesting,
“the sportive wit,
Not so, the irritable49 gods, with regard to Momus, who was, significantly enough, the Son of Night. Momus however cared nothing for the irritability50 of his august masters and mistresses. His ready wit pierced them all in turn; and the shafts51 of his ridicule52 excited many an absurd roar of anguish53. When Minerva had built the house of which she was so proud, the Olympian fool at once detected the error made by the Goddess of Wisdom, and remarked, “Had I turned house-builder, I would have had a movable mansion54.”
“Why so, you intellectual ass1?” asked the lady, who was somewhat rough-tongued, and loved antithesis55.
“Because,” answered the son of Nox, “I could then get away from bad neighbourhoods, and the vicinity of foolish women who consort56 with owls57!”
Venus, clad in her usual attire58, and proud in the conviction of her faultlessness, passed by Sir Momus, and turning gracefully59 in his presence, like Mademoiselle Rosati before a box-full of her admirers, defied him to detect a flaw in her unequalled and dazzling form.
Momus clapped his hands to his eyes, half-blinded by the lustre62, and said, “It is true enough, Ourania,—you are not to be looked at without blinking; but before you executed that charming pirouette, I heard your foot-fall on the clouds. Now, a heavy-heeled beauty is not a vessel63 without a flaw.”
Save Venus herself, there was not a goddess within hearing, who did not laugh more or less loudly, at the fool’s5 censure64. Vulcan, to draw off attention from the queen of love, and to gain a compliment for himself, directed the notice of Momus to the clay figure of a man which he had just executed. The critic looked at it for a moment, and turned away with a curl on his lip. “My man,” said he, “should have had a window in his chest. Through such a lattice, I could have looked in, not only upon his ailments65, but his thoughts.”
“My bull here,” said Neptune66, touching67 Momus with his trident, which at will he could extend from his own watery68 plain to the topmost point of Olympus,—“My bull here, of which I am the artist, is more perfect than our limping brother’s man.”
“The beast would have been more perfect still,” cried Momus, from his cradle in the clouds, “if he had had eyes nearer his horns. He would strike more surely than he can now. Leave making bulls, oh son of Ops, to your children in Ierne,—though, even their bulls shall be as laughable as your own.”
In this way the Fool of the Olympian Court treated without reserve the illustrious company, whom he fearlessly mocked and censured69. They never bore the censure well; and, ultimately, they rose and ejected him from Heaven. With a mask in one hand, and a small carved figure in the other, he lightly fell to Earth. “You see I come from the skies,” said the crafty70 fellow to the staring crowds that gathered round him, “and therefore am worthy71 of welcome and worship.”
How could the poor people know that he had been kicked out from Olympus? They raised an altar, hoisted72 the celestial73 exile above it, danced round it like fools, and went home shouting, “Vive la Folie!”
To pretend to show the moral of my story, would be to insult the good sense of my readers.
It is singular that the successor of Momus, as brewer74 of6 laughter to the gods, was Vulcan, and that he also was kicked out from Olympus. On the ninth day of his descent he came in sight of Lemnos, where the people, without stopping to think whether they were about to receive a precious gift or a rejected waif from Heaven, stretched out their arms to catch him. It is not everything that seems to come from above, that is divine.
And mark!—Since Momus fell, Folly has never left the Earth. But Vulcan taught men to labour; and the founder of industry, the great doer of a good work, was reconciled with Heaven. And Olympus did not continue without its fools, near or afar. The dances of Silenus, the lumbering76 grace of Polyphemus, and the coarse jokes of Pan, were provocatives of the empty laughter of the gods; and roystering dances, lumbering graces, and coarse jokes became the stock in trade of fools of later years and of more mortal mould.
They who will take the trouble to recall the incidents in the personal history of many of the philosophers of old, will not fail to perceive that, in many cases, they fulfilled the duties which were performed, much less efficiently77, perhaps, by the official fools at modern courts. They appear to have exercised, generally with impunity78, a marvellous license79 of speech, and to have communicated disagreeable truths to tyrants81 who would not have accepted an unpleasant inuendo from an ordinary courtier, without rewarding it with torture or death. This very rudeness of speech, on the part of many philosophers, to princes who were their patrons, was the distinguishing feature of the modern jester. In this respect they were sometimes imitated by the poets, who occasionally indulged in the criminal folly of making execrable puns; so early do we find an illustration of the remark of Ménage, that in all times the court poet was accounted as being also the court fool. Indeed, we shall see, under the head of French Jesters, a whole flock of7 royal poets vying82 with each other to receive the patent of King’s Fool, on the death of the official who had just departed full of honours and “doubles entendres.”
I believe that a volume might be very respectably filled with illustrations of the identity of philosopher, or poet, and fool,—in the sense of licensed83 court wit. My readers will probably be satisfied with a few rather than with a volume-full of proofs. Thus, it will be remembered that it was rather a perilous84 matter to joke with or to convey rough truths to the mind of the great Alexander. But his favourite philosopher, the light-hearted Anaxarchus, was able to do both, with impunity. What a necessary but disagreeable truth did he impress on his royal master, when the latter was bleeding from a recently received wound. “Ah!” exclaimed the philosopher, pointing to the place, “that shows that, after all, you are only a man, and not a god, as people call you, and as you would like to believe.”
Alexander only smiled at this very sufficient little sermon, and did not resent what perhaps he considered as amusing ignorance. It is remarkable85, however, that as in less remote days we meet with potentates86 who could not tolerate the free-spoken court fool, so in those earlier times we find “tyranni,” who were utterly88 unable to digest a joke or a reproach. Now the speech of Anaxarchus was utterly disgusting to the mind and feelings of Nicocreon of Salamis, who happened to be present when it was uttered. What the philosopher’s especial patron chose to take without discerning offence in it, it was not for Nicocreon to resent; but he never forgot or forgave it. Alexander was hardly dead when Nicocreon contrived to get Anaxarchus into his power, and he ordered that the philosopher should be pounded to death in a mortar89, “Pound away! pound away!” exclaimed the heroic fellow, as the iron hammers were reducing him to pulp90, “it’s only my body! you cannot pound my soul!” Nicocreon told him that if he were not more silent and less8 saucy91, his tongue should be cut out. To show how little Anaxarchus cared for the threat, he bit his tongue in two, and spat92 the mangled93 piece into the face of the tyrant80.
There, indeed, his wit may be said to have failed him, and he acted with less presence of mind than the philosopher Zeno, when the latter was in a precisely94 similar situation. When the inventor of dialectics lay nearly bruised to death under the pestles95 of the executioners employed by Nearchus, he called the latter to him as if he had something of importance to communicate. Nearchus bent96 over the lip of the mortar to listen, and Zeno, availing himself of his opportunity and his excellent teeth, bit off the ear of the tyrant close to his head. Hence “a biting remark, like that of Zeno,” passed into a proverb.
In a later page, it will be seen how the famous jester, Gonella, had the boldness of speech, but lacked the boldness of soul, of Anaxarchus and Zeno. There was a saying of Gonella’s that very nearly resembles one of Hippias, a free-spoken philosopher of Elis, who pleasantly made virtue97 consist in the entire freedom of man from all and every sort of dependence98 upon his fellow-men. Again, in Anaximenes,—not that philosopher who maintained that the stars were the heads of bright nails driven into the solid concave of the sky, but the pupil of Diogenes,—we find a parallel with Chicot, the celebrated99 jester of the French Kings Henry III., the last Valois, and Henry IV., the first Bourbon. Both were occasionally engaged in affairs of political importance, and Anaximenes, on one of these occasions, did capital service to his employers. Lampsacus was being besieged101 by Alexander. It had nobly resisted; but, unable to hold out any longer, the authorities deputed the philosopher to make terms with the besieger102. As soon as the latter beheld103 Anaximenes, guessing his errand, he exclaimed, in a burst of foolish rage, “I entirely104 refuse, beforehand, to grant what you are about to ask.” Chicot used to call9 Henry III. a “simpleton,” but Anaximenes only laughed pleasantly in the face of Alexander, as he said, “May it please your irresistible105 godship, the favour then which I have to ask is, that you will destroy the city of Lampsacus, enslave the citizens, and ruin their delegate who stands before you.” The conqueror106 laughed in his turn, and well rewarded the ready wit of a man who was for some years attached to his person.
The poets were not less free than the philosophers. When King Antigonus once caught his favourite Rhodian poet, Antagoras, cooking fish, he asked the bard107 whether Homer condescended108 to dress meals while he aspired109 to register the deeds of Agamemnon. “I cannot say,” answered the Rhodian, “but I very strongly believe this, that the king did not trouble himself as to whether any man in his army boiled fish or left it alone!”
The boldness of some of the old poets was quite on a par15 with their wit. Their absolute freedom of speech, like that of their official successors, the fools, was as useful and fearless as the modern freedom of the press. There were very few of the parasites111 and jesters of Dionysius who would venture to tell that disagreeable person beneficial truths. Antiphon, his poet, was an exception. The monarch once asked him, “What brass112 was the best?” and Antiphon answered, “That of which the statues of Aristogiton and Harmodius were made.” Considering that these were two patriots113 who rescued Athens from the tyranny of the Pisistratid?, the answer was as daring as it was witty. Dionysius disregarded the wit, and resented the audacity114;—in a sneaking115 way, however, for he put Antiphon to death because he refused to praise the writings of the despot. In one respect, Dionysius was like Cardinal116 Richelieu, he looked with spiteful feelings on every man who ventured to doubt his ability for writing tragedies. But in another sense, the “tyrannus” was superior to the cardinal,10 for he at least wrote his own tragedies, whereas those of Richelieu were written for him by his buffoon117, Boisrobert, who might well afford to praise them. For a better reason than that which induced Richelieu to patronize Boisrobert (who, buffoon as he was, founded the French Academy), Philadelphus patronized the comic poet Aristonymus, whom the king made Keeper of the Library at Alexandria, and who kept the king in good humour by his joyous118 conversation. Aristonymus did not forget that he held a double office; and as the Bards119 censured as well as commended the behaviour of the people, so he scattered120 eulogy121 or blame on the conduct of his patron, according to the latter’s deserts.
We shall find, in subsequent pages, instances of kings going into mourning on the death of their fools, and of the royal patrons raising tombs to them. In ancient times we also have instances of a whole people cherishing their poets quite as fondly as some monarchs122 did their jesters. I will only cite the case of Eupolis, that comic poet of Athens, whose unlicensed wit was so very little to the taste of Alcibiades, and who ultimately perished in a naval123 engagement between the Athenians and the Lacedemonians. His countrymen were so afflicted125 at losing a man whose wit and poetry were as new life to them, that they passed a decree whereby it was ordered that no poet should ever afterwards go to war. Artaxerxes did not mourn more truly for his witty but then deceased slave Tiridates, than the Athenians mourned for Eupolis. But Artaxerxes did not mourn half so long. He sat weeping, indeed, for three days, but he found consolation126 when Aspasia offered her ivory shoulder to support his aching head. So Henry II., of France, mourned for his dead jester Thony, even commissioning Ronsard to write his epitaph, but forgetting poet, fool, and epitaph in contemplating127 the mature beauty of Diana of Poictiers.
Less forgetful of a favourite dead wit was the patron of the comic poet, Timocreon of Rhodes; famous alike for his11 sharp appetite and verses, and for his power of pouring out wit and pouring in wine. It was a brother wit who would not venture to praise him, but who contrived to make the dead jester censure, by celebrating, himself in the apparently128 autograph lines,
“Multa bibens, et multa vorans, mala denique dicens
Multis, h?c jaceo Timocreon Rhodius.”
“Having drunk much, eaten much, and spoken much evil, here I lie, Timocreon of Rhodes.” This heathen jester lived nearly five centuries before the Christian129 era; I might perhaps, had I a right to act “Censor,” suggest that his epitaph would not be unsuitable over many a serious but defunct130 gentleman, born since that era commenced.
Let me rather do justice to the wit and independence of the old poets, generally. While doing so, I cannot but add my conviction that the philosophers were, on the whole, more independent in their jests than the poets. When Apollonius repaired from Chalcis to Rome, to become the tutor of Marcus Antoninus, he refused to go to the palace at all, saying that it was fitter for the pupil to come to the house of the instructor than for the latter to go to the dwelling of the pupil. The imperial hint, good-humouredly conveyed, that he had himself commenced this latter process by repairing from Chalcis to Rome, could not move him.
It has been usual, and Fl?gelA has done it, among others, to rank the elder Aristippus among the ancient court wits. Inasmuch as that he was the chief flatterer of Dionysius of Sicily, and loved Epicurean voluptuousness131, the founder of the Cyrenaic sect132 may be allowed to pass under that title, but he had little in common with the court jester of more modern times. He was as different from the latter in some respects, as he was from Crassus, the grandfather of Crassus the Rich, who according to Pliny was never known to laugh,—not even when his best friend broke his thigh133.
12 It is certain that Dionysius treated his flatterers as later sovereigns did their official jesters,—allowing for the difference of manners, morals, and customs. The poor jester whose head was placed on the executioner’s block by the sportive order of the ducal sovereign of Ferrara, proved indeed to be even worse off than the parasite110 Damocles, when Dionysius seated him on his throne, beneath an unsheathed sword suspended from a horse-hair.
Again, the freedom which the court fool subsequently held by right of office, we find fearlessly exercised by the philosophic134 Demochares, the Athenian ambassador, who being asked, by King Philip of Macedonia, to whom he was sent, what the king could do to most gratify the Athenians, replied, “The most gratifying thing you could do would be to hang yourself.” The courtiers murmured with indignation, but Philip dismissed the envoy135, with the remark, that he hoped the Athenians would perceive he had more wit than their representative, seeing that he could take with indifference136 such a joke as that flung at him by Demochares.
There are two philosophers whose names now occur to me, and of whom some erroneous notions appear to be entertained by their posterity;—Heraclitus and Democritus. We picture them as “Jean qui pleure” and “Jean qui rit,” looking on the first as made up of groans137, and the latter of gaiety. The fact however is, that Heraclitus, though given, as any man might be, at any period, who thought of the matter, to weep over the wickedness of the world, made that world laugh heartily138 by his rough answers to the polite invitations of Darius, who would fain have had him at the Persian court. Heraclitus and Darius remind me of Brusquet and Charles V. Democritus, too, was a different man from what he is generally thought to have been. He laughed, indeed, but it was at the follies139 of mankind; and he did not disdain140, like the weeping Ephesian, to figure at13 the court of Darius. There is one sample of his wit there, which is better than anything ever uttered by Bertholdo, the philosophic buffoon at the court of Alboin, King of the Lombards. Darius was inconsolable for the loss of his wife, declaring that he was the only man who had ever known real adversity. “And I will raise the queen from the dead in a few minutes,” said Democritus, “if I only——” “If you only, what?” impatiently exclaimed Darius, interrupting him. “If I only can find three individuals who have passed through life without adversity of some sort, and whose names I will engrave141 on the queen’s monument.” Darius knew the case was hopeless, and mournfully smiled. If he had given a small estate to the witty philosopher, the latter would have deserved it quite as well as the Joculatores of our first William and John, whose wit or wisdom was rewarded by raising them to the very pleasant condition of holders142 of land.
It is said of some of the German jesters that they occasionally lived on the people of the town, with the lord of which they resided in exercise of their office. A parallel to this may be met with in the annals of the philosophers, in the person of Demonax, who, leaving to his patrons to clothe and lodge143 him, boarded himself in a very facetious144 and economical way, by entering the first house, after he felt himself hungry, and there fully61 satisfying his appetite. But Demonax belonged to a lower class of the order of philosophers, as some later fools did to that of the general order of their profession. There was as much difference between Demonax and Socrates, as there was between Sibilot, as described by Huguenot authors, and our own light and noble-hearted Will Sommers. The happiest idea one can have of Socrates is that of seeing him in the studio of his father Sophroniscus, carving145 that group of the three Graces, the simplicity146 and elegance147 of which excited universal admiration148. He was ever the same,—a rough labourer patiently and certainly14 creating beauty. In him we fail to discern anything of the mere149 unlicensed jester. The Platonic150 and the Xenophontic Socrates may be said equally, though in different ways and measures, to challenge admiration. Leaving the philosopher, to encounter him again presently, let us look over antiquity151 for traces of the fool in people as in individuals.
Among the ancients, perhaps the Tirynthians had the reputation of being the very merriest of fools. Theophrastus is cited by Athen?us in proof of this. Those people of Argolis were so continually merry that they at last got tired of it, and applied152 to the oracle153 at Delphos to save them from being any longer such joyous simpletons.
“You shall be cured,” said the oracular authority, “if after sacrificing an ox to Neptune, you can throw the carcase into the sea, without laughing.”
“That will be easy enough,” said the Tirynthians, laughing all the while, “if we can only keep children away from the sacred fire.”
Of course, however, an enfant terrible managed to be present at the show. He was no sooner discovered than the now solemn Tirynthians began to drive him away, lest he should laugh or raise laughter during the ceremony, by some childish remark or question.
“What are you afraid of?” asked the sprightly154 lad,—“that I should upset the dish” (and he pointed155 to the sea) “that is to hold your beef?”
Poor as the joke was, it so tickled157 the fancy of the Tirynthians, that they laughed till their sides ached; and so they remained merry fools for ever. No jester, at a royal table, was ever so highly esteemed158 as an uproariously gay buffoon from this old city of Hercules—roystering Tirynthia.
The Tirynthians were never excelled, except by the people of Ph?stum, who, by all other Cretans, were reckoned15 as the first jesters in the world. In the days of those merry fellows, it may be observed, that the cleverest of them had to exercise their vocation159 on melancholy160 occasions. When Petronius Arbiter161 was committing slow suicide by alternately opening and closing his veins162, nothing excited him to more laughter than the sharply comic epigrams uttered by the jokers who stood around him.
Under the cloak of folly, good service has been rendered by wise men. By feigning163 want of wit, the elder Brutus saved himself to save his country; revenged a wrong, and converted regal Rome into a republic. We have another notable instance in the case of Solon, who, when the Athenian law forbade mention of the subject of Salamis, that island which gave Athens such an infinite world of trouble, assumed the bearing of one out of his wits, and, in better verse than a fool could have indited164, told truths that led to great consequences, and exhibited the patriotic165 courage and humour of the celebrated sage. Assuredly Solon was no fool, for he refused to be a king, and he invented taxation166. I will revert167 for a moment to Aristippus, the lover of La?s, and the flatterer of Dionysius,—the rosy168 philosopher who only cared for the present moment, but who had of the jester only his liberty of speech. When thrust into an inferior seat at table, and being asked, if he liked it as well as his higher place of the day before: “Ay, truly,” said he to Dionysius; “for the place I held yesterday, I despise today, since I hold it no longer. I honoured the seat, the seat did not honour me. So, today’s seat, which, yesterday, was without dignity, because I was not in it, is now dignified169 by holding me.” The court laughed; but the wit and the wisdom of the speech seem to be of the very mildest nature.
That the ancients carried their idea of “fooling” too far, may be seen in the fact that, as Sir Thomas Brown observes, “some drew provocatives of mirth from anatomies170, and jugglers showed tricks with skeletons.” It was not any16 reverend gentleman or philosopher who improved the occasion of Egyptian feasts, by showing a model mummy, but a light-hearted slave who exhibited the ivory effigy171 to the garlanded guests with, “Behold what we must all come to!” Antiquity went further than this in its patronage172 of the fool. In the funeral train, followed the arch-mime lately retained by the deceased patrician173; and it was this good fellow’s business to keep the mourners merry, by imitations of the speech, gesture, and manners of the deceased himself. Of this custom, the author last-named rightly says, that “it was too light for such solemnities, contradicting their funeral orations174 and doleful rites175 of the grave.” The mourners must have been sadly in want of the extract of Cachunde or Liberans, which was once a famous and highly magnified composition, used in the East Indies, to drive away melancholy.
How highly mirth was accounted of, even in grave sport, is proved by one fact,—that Lycurgus raised an image of Laughter, and caused it to be worshipped as a God. He loved, he said, to see people merry at feasts and assemblies.
Of the professional wit, we find a trace in a curious custom of Roman gentlemen. When these discovered that learning and wit began to be in more general estimation than arms or wealth, the clever fellows among them got on well enough, and setting their minds to discipline, became the favoured guests at the most brilliant parties. The dull millionaires were rather nettled176 at this, but they fell upon an exquisite177 plan to be on an equality with their sparkling rivals. They had neither wit nor learning themselves, but they purchased slaves, and especially Greek slaves, who possessed178 both. Had they to attend an assembly where philosophy was most in fashion, they took with them their more learned bondsmen; but was the evening expected to be mirthful, then the stolid179 owners ordered the slaves with comic dispositions181 and merry turns of thought and expression,17 to accompany them. These delightful182 fellows were ever welcome, and when their sallies produced explosions of laughter and applause, their masters stroked their beards complacently183, and assumed a modest composure, as if they had said all the good things uttered by their serfs.
Like the fools of later ages, these jesters were the more acceptable, because they helped mortal man to kill Time. When society was without books, it learned what it could, and amused itself as it might, by the help of philosophers, minstrels, or jesters. Printing, indeed, killed neither mirth, music, nor philosophy; but the decline of the profession of the hired fool certainly began at the period of the discovery of printing.
I might find opportunity here of saying something touching the office of the parasite, as a jester; but I have treated that subject at such length, in my “Table Traits,” that I will rather refer my readers to that little volume than repeat what is said in it, here. I may notice, however, in addition, that the old classical, professional jesters, in Athens, had the privilege of entering any company, without invitation. Plautus, therefore, calls them “Flies.” The parasite was of this profession, and there was not much civility vouchsafed184 towards him, if he was of the class that did not wait to be invited. The host would rudely order him to play the fool for the amusement of the company; to whom he narrated185 all the jokes he could remember, and when his memory ran dry, he would ignobly186 descend to read them from manuscripts. Ma?tre Guillaume, a fool at the court of Henri IV., did much the same. The parasite was interested personally, as well as pecuniarily187, in amusing his hearers, for if he failed to do so, they had no hesitation188 in rising, kicking his seat from under him, raining blows upon his body, breaking the dishes upon his head, and, fixing a rope, or collar, round his neck, flinging him headlong into the street.
Xenophon, in his account of the banquet at the marine18 villa189 of Callias, affords us an excellent idea of the person and merits of the professional buffoon. The name of the latter is Philip. This fool by vocation, when all the gentlemen are at supper, knocks at the door, and with a rollicking sort of impudence190, says to the servant who opens it, “Here we are! the gentlemen need not deliberate about letting me in to supper. I am provided with everything necessary for doing so, for nothing. My bay horse is tired with carrying nothing in his stomach, and I am quite as weary with running about to see how I can best fill my own.” And then forcing his way in, he raises a laugh, by exclaiming—“Gentlemen, you all know me and my professional privilege. But I have come uninvited, chiefly because I have an aversion from ceremony, and a disinclination to put you to the trouble of a formal invitation.”
Callias remarks, “We must not refuse him his dish;” and the host then welcomes the jester, by bidding him take place; for serious conversation has made the guests dull, and they will be glad of an opportunity to indulge in laughter.
Philip cut a thousand jokes without being able to tickle156 his hearers into laughter; and it was only when he affected192 to be broken-hearted and about to die with shame at his ill-success or their dulness, that they promised to try and find something risible193 in his professional mirth. And this must have been a very sorry joke indeed.
The best, perhaps the only tolerable scintillation of wit struck out by the “laughter-maker,” is to be found, after the circus-girl who accompanies the Syracusan showman has leaped through the hoop194 in which knives are planted with every point towards the passing leaper. Philip has then a fling at an Athenian alderman who belonged to the Peace-party of his day:—“Ah!” he exclaims, “what pleasure should I enjoy to see Pisander, that grave counsellor, taking lessons from this girl; he that is ready to19 swoon away at the sight of a lance, and says it is a barbarous cruel custom to go to war and kill men!” This is not extremely lively, but it is at least as good a joke as when he says to Socrates, on the assertion of the philosopher that he intended to dance: “Well, I believe your thighs195 and shoulders are of the same weight; and that if you put the one into one scale, and the other into another, just as the constable196 weighs bread in the market-place, you will not be in danger of being forfeited197, so justly poised198 will be the respective weights.” And, therewith, the buffoon expresses a desire to dance with Socrates, and begins awkwardly imitating the previous graceful60 dancing of the girl, raising peals199 of mirth from the little company of nobles and sages200, and ending, heated and panting, with a sly look towards the slaves standing201 in grim repose202 before the board on which was placed the wine. With a sly remark, he wishes they were like coachmen, who are the more prized for being quick in their driving and dexterous203 in turning. This remark, of course, sets the wine-bearers rapidly moving towards Philip and among the company generally.
This professional fool, it is to be observed, is proud of his profession. “I suppose you value yourself,” says Lycon, “on your power to make men laugh?”
“Ay, truly,” answers Philip;—“and have I not better reason for being proud of this, than the finical Callipides of piquing204 himself at making men weep at his tragic205 verses in the theatre?—Proud of my trade!” he subsequently exclaims, “oh, oh, I should think so; for see you, when people are in the way of good fortune, they invite me to their houses; but when misfortune or misery206 falls upon them, they carefully avoid meeting me.” Nicerates is struck by the remark, for he is one of those men whose friends, ruined by their extravagance, expect him to extricate207 them from their difficulties. He sighs, when he compares his own condition with that of the fool, whose vocation at this renowned20 banquet terminates by a taste of his craft, when he approvingly winks208 to the Syracusan, and, after his fashion, says Amen to that lucky showman’s prayer, soliciting209 the gods to send plenty of everything, wherever he came, save of judgment210 and good sense.
This is his last joke, for Socrates grows weary of him and of his chattering211. “But it is not proper,” says Philip, a little nettled, “that we should be silent at a feast.”
“Very true,” replies the philosophic son of a statuary and a midwife, “but it is also true that it is better to be silent than say what it were more profitable to leave unsaid.” And this very strong hint extinguishes the jester.
It is impossible to read the graphic212 sketch213 by Xenophon, taking it as a faithful account of an actual scene, without feeling wonder that an intellectual party, like the one depicted214, should need, or should tolerate, such aids to enjoyment215 as those professed216 to be afforded by the buffoon and the mountebank217 with his pretty dancing-girl and ballet company. The wit and the wisdom are all on the side of the gentlemen, and of Socrates in particular, who, to do him justice, is quite as merry as he is wise. His wit sparkles throughout the banquet, and perhaps a hecatomb of witty fools would never have bethought themselves of giving a description so graceful, so touching, and so true, of the rich uses and the vast abuses of wine, as Socrates does at this very party. Nor is stately Xenophon himself without his joke,—as though moved by the fact of his dealing218 here with jesters. “When the little ballet of ‘Bacchus and Ariadne’ was played out,” says the author, “the company found it so natural in its pantomime, that they became convinced of what had not previously219 entered their minds, namely that the youth and girl who had represented the chief characters were actually in love with one another. This,” adds Xenophon, “caused the guests who were married, and some who were not, to mount their horses forthwith, and ride full21 speed to Athens, with the briskest resolutions imaginable.” But while the husbands went home to greet their spouses220, and lovers to pay homage221 to their respective Lalages, some stayed behind—Socrates was of the number—and these “went a-walking with Lycon, Autolicus, and Callias.” But the fool went not with the philosopher, the nobles, and the young Autolicus, who had won a prize at the Olympic Games,—and, consequently, we must keep in the company with which we are bound to journey.
This species of company was not equally pleasant to all men. Athen?us tells us that the Scythian Anacharsis was once present at a banquet, at which a number of professional fools did their office so drolly222, that every one laughed,—save the Scythian. Presently, a monkey was introduced, and at this animal’s singular tricks, Anacharsis laughed till the tears ran down his cheeks. As some surprise was expressed at this, by the company, the Scythian justified223 himself by remarking,—“The monkey is comic and risible by nature, and without effort; but man is so only by art and affectation.” In a similar sense, Athen?us quotes a passage from Euripides, in which the poet says:—“There are numerous people who study the art of raising laughter by witty speeches and sparkling repartees. For my part, I hate these elaborate buffoons224, whose unrestrained tongue spares not the wise, and whom, indeed, I do not reckon worthy of being accounted among ‘men.’”
In the days of King Philip, the Macedonian, whenever a man told an extremely witty story, he was pretty sure to be met with the remark, “Ah, that comes from the Sixty.” It was as much as doubting the originality225 of the wit. “The Sixty” was, in fact, a club of wits. They met in Athens, not at a tavern226, but in the temple of Hercules. We should as soon expect to hear of a convivial227 body of wits assembling every Saturday night in “Rowland Hill’s Chapel228.” They were fellows who had the very highest22 opinion of their own abilities, for they regularly entered in a book all the witticisms229 of the evening. This was, probably, the very first jest-book ever put together. To listen to it, when the Secretary took it with him to private parties, must have been an antepast of ‘Punch.’ The precious book has perished, but Athen?us has preserved the names of a few of the members, which, however, are not worth repeating, though it may be stated, that the owners had also nicknames; and one tall, clever, nimble fellow, Callimedes, was familiarly hailed by his fellow-clubbists as “the Grasshopper230.” Philip heard of this merry, social, witty company, and longing231 to know more of them, their sayings and doings, he did not indeed invite them to his distant court, but he sent them a talent (nearly £200 sterling232), and requested the loan of the last volume of the transactions of the “Sixty Club.” The book was duly despatched; and perhaps the loan of a volume was never paid for at so high a rate: the authors thus played the part of court fools by deputy. Their jokes were stereotyped233, and had a long and merry life of it. It was useless for any man to fire one off as his own, for the source was instantly discovered, and the company would derisively234 call out, “An Old Sixty!” just as dull retailers235 of faded jests are suppressed, in our own day, by the cry of, “An Old Joe!”
Philip is said to have possessed his own court fool in Clisophus. Fl?gel says, that the latter excited shouts of laughter by his imitations of his royal master’s style, voice, manner, and even infirmities. But, according to Athen?us, Clisophus seems to have been a parasite, who imitated his patron out of flattery, and did not mimic236 him in order to excite risibility237. At other courts there were mimics238 who played the fool before their sovereign lords, by caricatured imitations of fencers, singers, and even orators,—especially of their defects. The most celebrated, perhaps, was Herodotus,23 a burly namesake of the father of history, who kept the court of Antiochus ever merry by his mimicry239, and who was named, par excellence240, Logomimus.
The fools and the philosophers were not always identical, and they often came in contact, as was to be expected. We have an instance in the buffoon Satyrion, named by Lucian, and the grave Alcidamas, who wrote a treatise241 on death. The sage could not tolerate the fun and the Egyptian accent of the ugly and close-cropped fool; and when the latter called the man of wisdom a “lap-dog,” the philosopher challenged him to single combat. Some of the guests were ashamed, and some laughed, to see sciolist and sage heartily belabouring each other; but the laughter was universal when the philosopher, beaten to a mummy, confessed himself vanquished242, and afterwards stood as mute as a courtesan in a Greek play.
Socrates (as I have previously remarked) is said, by more than one writer, ancient and modern, to have united in his own person the philosopher and the fool. His ugliness, deformity, and uncouthness,—his childish play, his extravagant243 dancing, his inclination191 to laugh at everything,—all these and more have been cited as foundations for reckoning him among the jesters. Zeno, according to Cicero, especially styled him the “Athenian buffoon,” which was probably meant for a compliment. The best description of him is that of Alcibiades, in Plato, who says that Socrates resembled the large images of Silenus, which were filled with little statuettes of the gods. Fl?gel rejects the picture of Socrates, represented by Aristophanes in the ‘Clouds,’ as “suspicious.” But Socrates has nothing of the fool in him in that play, except that he is represented as proprietor244 of the Thinking-Shop, and deriving245 powers of humbug246 and circumlocution247, from the clouds. In this play, the recognized freedom of the fool, as regards liberty of speech at the expense of the audience, is exercised by the characters24 “Just Cause” and “Unjust Cause,” as the following sample will show:—
“Unj. Now, then, tell me: from what class do the lawyers come?
“Just. From the blackguards.
“Unj. Very good! And the public speakers?
“Just. Oh, from the blackguards, also.
“Just. I am looking.
“Unj. But what do you see?
“Just. By all the gods, I see more blackguards than anything else. That fellow, I particularly know; and him yonder; and that blackguard with the long hair.”
The above was the true license of the fool, in the professional use of the term; and the Athenian blackguards only laughed to hear themselves thus distinguished249.
The above is among the boldest of the personal assaults made by Aristophanes against the vices250 or failings of his countrymen. He claimed the privileges of Comedy, as the Fool did those of his cap and bells. This he does, especially in ‘The Acharnians,’ when Dic?opolis, looking straight at the audience, says, “Think nothing the worse of me, Athenian gentlemen, if, although I am a beggar, I hazard touching on your affairs of state, in comic verse; for even comedy knows what is proper, and, if you find me sharp, you shall also find me just.” Still nearer did the poet come to the license of the jester, when, in ‘The Knights,’ he himself turns actor as well as author, and so dressed, looked, and mimicked251, without once employing the name of, the great demagogue whom he was satirizing252, that every spectator recognized the well-known Cleon. The same author’s attack on the litigious spirit of the Athenians, in his ‘Wasps,’ is another instance of what I am attempting to illustrate253. This is more particularly the case when he makes his characters25 address themselves immediately to the audience, as may be supposed to occur in the Parabasis of the last-named piece. Here the satirist254 bids the audience to provide themselves with clearer understandings, if they would enjoy the poets thoroughly. “Henceforth, good gentlemen,” are his words, “have more love and regard for such of your poets as treat you to something original. Preserve their sayings, and keep them in your chests with your apples. If you do this, there will be a scent75 of cleverness from your clothes, that shall last you through a whole year.” In his ‘Peace,’ the finest touch of satire255 is not in what is said, but in what is left unsaid; for the goddess whose name gives a title to the piece, never once opens her mouth. The licensed jester appears as broadly in the author’s dealings with the gods, whose place in Heaven is represented as occupied by the Demon124 of War, who is engaged in braying256 the Greek States in a stupendous mortar. The daring of the author, as exercised in pelting257 the gods themselves with jokes, is still more flagrant in ‘The Birds,’ where he burlesques258 the national mythology259, in presence of a people whose jealous fury was just then aroused by suspicion of a conspiracy260 existing against the national religion. That the audience should have tolerated the audacity of their favourite jester, is a proof of the power he held over them. Nevertheless, they were probably more delighted with his personalities261, and they recognized with shouts of laughter the brace262 of gallant263 military gentlemen thus described by one of the women in the ‘Lysistrata’:—“By Jove, I saw a man with long hair, a commander of cavalry264, on horseback, who was pouring into his brazen265 helmet a lot of pease-soup, which he had just bought from an old woman. I saw also a Thracian, with shield and javelin266, like Tereus. He went up to the woman who sold figs267, and, frightening her away with his arms, took up her ripe figs and began swallowing them.” The national satirist is seen again in the recommendation put in the mouth of the male chorus in26 the same play, and which is to this effect:—“If the Athenians would only follow my advice, their ambassadors should never go upon their missions, except when drunk. Sobriety and Common Sense do not go together with us. If, for instance, we send sober legates to Sparta, they only watch for opportunity to create mischief268. If the Spartans269 speak, we do not heed270 them; if they are silent, we wrongly suspect them. Let our envoys271 get drunk, and agree in what they hear, and in the reports they send home.” Nor does Aristophanes spare the women more than the men. How archly, no doubt, did Mnesilochus look at the audience, when he ungallantly remarked, in ‘The Thesmophoriazus?,’—“Among all the ladies of the present day, you would seek in vain to find a Penelope. They are Ph?dras, every one of them.” It is not to be supposed that the comic poet ever offended by his trenchant272 jests, although a passage delivered by the chorus, in ‘The Ecclesiazus?’ (that exquisite satire against the ideal republics of philosophers, with impracticable laws), would seem, perhaps, to imply something of the sort. Turning to the audience, the Chorus remarks, “I am going to make a little suggestion to you. I wish the clever among you to be on my side; for remember how clever I am myself. They who laugh merrily will prefer me, I know, because of my own mirthful jesting.” This suggestion sounds as if the dunces and dullards had been sneering273 at the satirist for his smartness and sprightliness274. Even if so, he continued to laugh at gods and men. At both, as in ‘Plutus,’ where he ridicules275 the deities276 for their many names, by which they hoped to catch a gift under one appellation277, which they lost under another; and where he illustrates278 the irreligiousness of men, by remarking that nowadays they never enter a temple, except for a purpose which, it will be recollected279, was religiously avoided by the Essenes on the Sabbath. The last illustration is made in the very spirit and letter which marked the “Fools” of the27 fifteenth century. They pleaded for such jokes the immunities280 of their office, and Aristophanes does something very like this when he makes Xanthias exclaim, in ‘The Frogs,’ “Oh, they are always carrying baggage in comedy!”
Fl?gel has been too anxious to increase his list of Fools, by including among them the planus, or impostor. He takes for a joker, the cheat denounced by Horace in the 17th of the First Book of his Epistles. That cheat is simply a street vagabond, who deceives the humane281 by pretending to have broken his leg, and who laughs at them when they have passed on, after giving him relief. Even this sorry joke he cannot often repeat. Then we have, from Athen?us, other comical fellows cited, whose funny things won the admiration of Greece and Rome, the people of which countries must have been easily pleased. Among these are the Alexandrian Matreas, who wrote chapters of a ‘Comic Natural History,’ wherein he discussed such questions as, “Why, when the sun sets at sea, does he not set off swimming?” “Why do the swans never get drunk with what they imbibe282?” Then we hear of a Cephisodorus,—neither the tragic poet nor the historian,—whose stock joke consisted in his running breathless, either from or towards the city honoured by his residence, and with an air of frantic283 terror, informing all whom he passed or encountered, of some awful calamity284. It is hardly possible to imagine that people laughed more than once, if once, at a sorry fool like this. Not much more risible was that Pantaleon, who was wont285 to address strangers in the street in tirades286 of bombastic287 nonsense, utterly meaningless and incomprehensible. The joke was for the standers-by, who knew Pantaleon, and enjoyed the astounded288 look of those whom he addressed. According to Athen?us, the last comicality of Pantaleon was in imposing289 on his two sons, whom he called separately to his side, when dying, and confidentially290 told each where he would find a hidden treasure. When they had looked for28 this in vain, they probably understood why their respectable sire had died laughing. Many of this class of fools can only be considered as “hoaxers.” Such was another Cephisodorus, who disgraced his dignified name by very undignified tricks,—as when he hired a host of hardy291 day-labourers, and gave them rendezvous292 in such a narrow street that, when all were assembled, it was impossible to move either backward or forward. The “Berners Street Hoax,” by Theodore Hook, was entirely after the fashion of Cephisodorus, and was not the more excusable on that account.
Forcatulus, a learned writer on law, accepts as true a story, very like one to be found in Rabelais, and which Fl?gel quotes from another accomplished jurist, Accursius. It is a story in which ignorance is made to pass for wisdom, and is therefore, although common, yet not quite so excellent a joke as it would pretend to be; and is to this effect:—
The Romans sent an ambassador to Greece, in order to procure293 a copy of the Laws of the twelve Tables. The Greeks would make no such costly294 gift till they were satisfied that the petitioners295 had men amongst them who could comprehend the wisdom of the Laws. They despatched an envoy to look into the matter; and when the Romans heard of him and his purpose, they resolved to defeat him by means of a fool. They clothed the latter in purple, surrounded him with a guard of honour, and dismissed him to encounter the accomplished ambassador from Greece, with one single point of instruction,—he was on no account to open his mouth.
The Athenian commissioner296, seeing the representative of Roman wisdom standing before him, grave and speechless, observed, with a smile, “I understand. The gentleman is a Pythagorean, and carries on an argument only by signs. With all my heart!” And, thereupon he raised a single finger, to imply that there was only one principle of nature in the universe.
29 The simpleton sent by Rome, not dreaming that this was the opening of a philosophical297 argument, but looking upon it rather as a menace, extended two fingers and a thumb towards the Greek, as if about to take him by the nose.
“Good! very good!” murmured the Athenian. “He shows me the Pythagorean Trias,—the triple God in one. I must intimate that I understand him;”—and the philosophical envoy approached the stolid Roman, with the flat of his hand extended towards him. He intended thereby to imply that the divine Trias was the upholder of all things. The Roman, however, thinking it an approximation to a box on the ear, drew back a step, lifted his doubled fist, and awaited the coming of the Greek.
The face of the latter was covered by a radiant smile. He could only exclaim, “Perfect! charming! divine! The silent sage tells me that the divine supporter of all things is in himself All-mighty. Admirably done! a nation with such sages must be worthy of laws enacted298 by the leaders of civilization.”
Now if this story be, as Forcatulus will have it, historically true, I must add that it has been improved in the hands of the story-tellers. These, of course, have made it a Christian disputation, in which the hired fool has but one eye. The real metaphysician reads in the signs of the simpleton the whole Christian revelation, but the story is improved by the fool’s own description of the matter. “When I saw him raise one finger, I thought he mocked me, as having but one eye; and I held out two fingers, meaning that my single eye was as good as his two. But when he, therefore, held out three fingers, signifying that there were only three eyes between us, I doubled my fist, to knock him down for his insolence299.”
Among the old class of jesters some writers rank the Aretalogi, who appear to have been improvisers of merry or wonderful stories for the amusement of a company, by30 whom they were invited, or hired. Juvenal says that when Ulysses, at the table of Alcinous, described the person and deeds of the cannibal Polyphemus, some of the guests turned pale, while the narrator, to others seemed only a jester:
“Risum fortasse quibusdam
Moverat mendax Aretalogus;”
or, as the Jesuit Tarteron translates this passage,—“Les autres pamoient de rire, et regardoient Ulysse comme un diseur de contes faits à plaisir.” Some of the guests, in fact, laughed at Ulysses as they would have done at a regular romancer.
Again, Suetonius, in the 74th chapter of his Life of Augustus, after describing the pleasant social customs of the emperor, his agreeable company, and his courteous300 and affable manner with them, adds that, to encourage their mirth and their freedom, “aut acroamata et histriones, aut etiam triviales ex circo ludios interponebat, ac frequentius aretalogos.” To show the value of this last word, according to English writers, I turn to an old translation of Suetonius, published in 1692, and there I find that, “for mirth’s sake, Augustus would often have at his table either some to tell stories, or players, or common Merry Andrews out of the Circus, but more frequently boasting pedagogues302 and maintainers of paradoxes303.”
It might easily be concluded that the Aretalogus was really of the number of professional jesters, were it not that I find Lampridius quoted by Fl?gel as including Ulpian in this class, because he sat at the table of Alexander Severus, “ut haberet fabulas literales.” But it is almost impossible to admit of this, for the wise Ulpian was the solemn president of the Imperial Council of State, a great lawyer, a great reformer, a moral and a religious man, according to the light possessed by him. He was, as it seems to me, rather the Mentor304 than the Jester of Severus, who was, for31 a time, the bright example of men,—of any and every rank. The imperial virtues305 were held to be the result of the teaching and practices of Ulpian. To his frugal306 table the Emperor invited men of learning and virtue, and Ulpian was invariably of the number. So far, however, was the profound jurisconsult from being a mere jester, that, as we are told, the pauses in the pleasing and instructive conversation of himself and fellow-guests “were occasionally enlivened by the recital308 of some pleasing composition, which,” says Gibbon, “supplied the place of the dancers, comedians309, and even gladiators, so frequently summoned to the tables of the rich and luxurious310 Romans.” That there was little or nothing of the conceited311 Aretalogus in Ulpian, may be seen in the fact that his virtue was of too stern a quality, and that he was slain312 by the Pr?torian guards because he was more wise than merry.
We next come to the Scurra, a jester, of whom we find an illustration in ancient comedy. When the witnesses called by Agorastocles (in the ‘P?nulus’ of Plautus) pompously313 order Collybiscus to walk in their rear, that personage remarks,
“They act exactly like buffoons, who put every man behind them;” in which we see something of the ordinarily insolent314 character of these individuals.
Yet they are themselves said to have been originally the “followers315” in the retinue316 of great men, and their name, Scurra, or Sequura, is derived317 by some lexicographers from ‘sequi,’ to follow. Their wit was sharp but polished, and to be scurrilous318, in the olden time, was rather a credit than a disgrace; and if the enemies of Cicero called him the scurra consularis, it was not that they found his sarcasms320 coarse, but that they felt them penetrating321 and fatal.
The Scurr?, however, seem to have sunk to a level with32 the common buffoons, as we collect from the letter of Pliny to Genitor (l. ix. ep. 17). Pliny’s friend had written to him to express his disgust at a splendid entertainment where he had been a guest, being marred322 by the jokes, antics, and wiles323 of the professional scurr?, cin?di, and moriones. The difference between the first and the last who belonged to the profession of fools, consisted in this,—the Scurra professed the art of exciting his hearers to risibility by extravagant yet sparkling wit. The Morio worked more quietly, and as if he joked licentiously325 by natural disposition180 thereto. It is worthy of observation that Pliny rather chides326 his friend. He writes, substantially, in reply, “Pray smooth your brow. I do not hire such fellows myself, but I do not turn up my nose at those who follow a contrary fashion. There is nothing novel or grateful to me in the hackneyed gestures of the wanton, the pleasantry of the jester, or the nonsense of the fool.” And the philosopher adds, with great fairness, “You see it is not so much my judgment as my taste that is against them;” and, he says further, “When I have reading, music, or the company of an actor at my own house, there are some guests who leave directly, or who, if they stay, look as ‘glumpy’ at the diversions I provide, as you did at those which lately marred your entertainment. The truth is,” thus concludes the philosopher, and it is advice as valuable now as ever, “we should accept, as well-meant, the diversions provided for us by others, that they, in their turn, may be indulgent towards those we provide for them.” One thing noteworthy here is, that the sensible people in Rome did not really care for the “fool.” If the conquest of Scipio Asiaticus over Antiochus brought in that sort of entertainment, the best philosophers (for some stooped to folly) protested against it by both precept327 and example.
The Scurra, as I have said, was not in every age a polished fool. The buffoon at the fair who obtained the applause of33 his audience for grunting328 like a pig, and, as the audience thought, more like a pig than the animal itself, is called by Ph?drus a “Scurra.” He probably sank lower in his practice than any of his class, for he announced that the entertainment he was about to exhibit had never before been known on any stage. But even the best of the Scurr? seem to me to justify329 rather the censure of Genitor than the praise of Horace. The latter, it will be remembered, on the famous journey to Brundusium, was present at the cudgelling of brains between Sarmentus (who had run away from slavery to set up as a Scurra) and Cicerrus, who was a well-to-do parasite of his day. Horace asserts that the wit of these two induced them all to merrily prolong their supper; and yet all the fun perpetrated was of a dreary330 cast. The Scurra joked coarsely on the deformity and infirmity of the parasite, and the latter retorted by reproaching the Scurra with his condition of slave, and the puny331 insignificance332 of his body. If Sarmentus was the “delight” of C?sar Augustus, that monarch was very easily pleased.
Perhaps there was no greater patron of the Scurr?, and all similar and many more degraded persons, than Sylla. He wasted his colossal333 fortune on fools of every description,—some of them monsters of uncleanness. Fl?gel, when noticing the criminal liberality of Sylla towards the crowds of debauched followers who occupied his table and house, and accompanied him abroad, says that for their sakes and under their influences, he neglected public business. But the fact is, that Sylla did not lead this disreputable life until after he had abdicated334 the dictatorship, and had gone into his sensual and unhappy retirement335 at Puteoli.
Antony was not more choice than Sylla in his “jolly companions,” nor in his own conduct. He was often indeed his own fool, and few great men ever played that character so thoroughly, but all were not fools and jesters and jugglers, whom historians have placed round the table and at34 the hearth336 of Antony. Fl?gel especially errs337 in classing among the jugglers retained by the Triumvir the beautiful Cytheris, or Lycoris, that slave whom the gentle and gallant Gallus loved, but whose desertion of him for Antony gained for us the tender eclogue of Virgil.
Juvenal cites with Sarmentus, the name of Galba as a buffoon or parasite of Augustus, and he does this (Sat. v.) in order to shame a dissolute friend who saw no harm in allowing his “loins to grow fat by others’ meat.” “What!” exclaims the Satirist, “are you not yet ashamed of your course of life? Can you still believe that sovereign happiness consists in living at another man’s table,—where you support more insults than were ever heaped on Sarmentus and Galba at the table of C?sar?”
Galba was an aristocratic Demonax. He was, moreover, a short hump-backed fellow, and he seems rather to have been the cause of wit in others than witty himself. It was in allusion338 to his deformity that Augustus remarked, after Galba had maintained some absurd proposition, “I can tell you what is right, yet I can’t put you straight.” It is of Galba that is told the story of his feigning to go to sleep at his own table while M?cenas was saying very polite things to the host’s wife; but when another of the guests attempted to filch339 something from the board, “Hold there!” cried Galba, “I am asleep for him, but not for you!”
Martial340 complains that he himself was less known to his contemporaries, all witty poet as he was, than Caballus, the buffoon of Tiberius. This individual is supposed to be the same with the Claudius Gallus of Suetonius. But Gallus seems to have been as much of a friend as a man could be, of an Emperor who was accustomed to behead such of his acquaintances as got the better of him in argument. That Gallus was hardly a professional fool may be gathered from the words of Suetonius, according to the quaint341 translation of the edition of 1692. “Claudius Gallus, a most notorious35 old Sir Jolly, who had been formerly342 branded for his debauches by Augustus, and severely343 reprimanded by himself (Tiberius) in the Senate, inviting344 him (Tiberius) to supper, he promised to come, on the terms that nothing were omitted of his usual way of entertainment,”—which, according to the context, seems to have been of a terribly licentious324 character.
Fl?gel refers, for an example of the impunity of Court Fools, in the bold wagging of their tongue at the Courts of the Roman Emperors, to the remark of a jester to Vespasian. The former had been saying sharp things to all around him, but, observed the Emperor, “you have addressed no observation to me.” Now Vespasian, whom we are accustomed to picture to ourselves as a towering personage of heroic carriage, was a poorly built fellow who went about in a half-sitting posture345, like Mr. Wright in the part of the retired346 coachman, whose limbs have stiffened347 into the posture which he had preserved through a long course of years, on the box. The jester joked very indecently on this weakness of the monarch, but I do not think the sorry humourist was a wit by profession. “Quidam urbanorum,” is the way in which he is described, but this may mean “one of the men about town,” and the old translation from which I have already made an extract, renders it “one of the wits of the time.” Whichever it be, it seems to show that the jokers could take great liberties with some emperors. Other instances prove that some emperors took deadly vengeance348 on the jokers.
Commodus Antoninus may be reckoned among those princes who have been their own fools, and he played the part rarely; but it was more in the spirit of insane than witty folly. His fun, like the club of Hercules, which he for ever carried on his shoulder, was crushing rather than exhilarating. Gallienus, who resembled him in many respects, and was as cruel, licentious, depraved, and cold-hearted,36 kept a second table for his buffoons; which they occupied like regular gentlemen of the Imperial household. When this potentate87 played the fool for his own amusement, he could be, by caprice at least, less bloodthirsty in his frolicsomeness349 than Commodus; as, for instance, when he ordered a knave350 of a jeweller to be flung into the arena351, and let loose upon him—not a roaring lion, but a poor capon. The joke, as poor as the bird, was, of course, received with universal applause.
We have some insight afforded us with regard to the position occupied by the retained jester, in the account of the strange supper given by Nasidienus to M?cenas and others. The guest just named took with him his two “shadows” uninvited. They were expected to contribute to the hilarity352 of the feast, and they occupied the same couch with their patron, the latter reclining between them. Nasidienus was in the same way supported by his two parasites, one of whom excited the mirth of the company by swallowing whole cheesecakes at once, like a clown in a pantomime; and the other extolled353 the dishes generally. These two, however, drank little or nothing; they appear to have been trained to spare their master’s wine. The guests and their parasites observed no such temperance, but tippled freely, and one of the latter especially kept up the laughter of the visitors by mock compliments on the feast, and mock sentiment on things, generally.
The Morio, as I have previously observed, was usually a mis-shapen creature, a sort of monstrous354 imbecile, heavy and hideous355 in body, and childish in mind; a simpleton, whose naturally foolish remarks contrasted with his strength and rude shape of body. Ladies in the olden time kept them, as ladies of a later period kept monkeys, for their amusement in their own chambers356. There was even a market for them, and at the Forum357 Morionum, a thoroughly frightful358 and foolish animal of this species would fetch about eighty pounds sterling.
37 Many Emperors, too, bought specimens359 of these monstrosities, a fashion which was only less hideous than the mania360 of a later time for china monsters, who exonerated361 their stomachs of the liquor required by their mistresses. Heliogabalus was a prodigal362 amateur of the former kind of property; and it has been suggested that an imbecile Morio was kept by a dull owner, that his own stupidity might seem wit by comparison.
That a noble Roman maintained slaves whose wit should entertain himself and his friends, we know from several instances. The same slaves were also employed to lighten the last hours, and to render death easy to their masters,—if they could. Nay363, it must be confessed that it seems they sometimes succeeded. Witness the case of Petronius Arbiter, that magnificent Consul307, who almost renders vice100 attractive, like Boccaccio, by writing of it in choice and elegant (yet mournful) phraseology. When that very superb gentleman was stretched on his death-couch, he might have remarked, with the Irish squire364, that he died in perfect ease of mind, for he had never denied himself anything. But Petronius could not die easily without a little stimulant365. He felt himself ennuyé, and he sent for his wittiest366 friends and his choicest slaves. Of the latter he freed some and whipped others, and he found a mild pleasure in both. But the dearest solace367 of this dying Roman noble was in the amusing stories and ridiculous epigrams recited to him. With these he amused his fancy till his jaws368 suddenly fixed369 in a fit of laughter, and the jesters around look down upon a corpse370. Thus died an accomplished Roman gentleman A.D. 66.
But we are departing from the official fool, of whom it is said, that, with his place and privileges properly marked in a household, he was not known in Europe till the period of the Lower Empire. It is certain that the stern Attila brought professional jesters, as well as irresistible warriors371, with him38 across the Roman frontiers. When the ambassadors of Theodosius the Younger were entertained at a banquet by the Hun, the pomp, gravity, and tremendous drinking were accompanied by an immoderate amount of foolery. “A Moorish372 and a Scythian buffoon,” says Gibbon, “successively excited the mirth of the rude spectators, by their deformed373 figure, ridiculous dress, antic gestures, absurd speeches, and the strange unintelligible374 confusion of the Latin, the Gothic, and the Hunnic languages; and the hall resounded375 with loud and licentious peals of laughter. In the midst of this intemperate376 riot, Attila alone, without a change of countenance377, maintained his stern and inflexible378 gravity.” We hear, too, of the presence of a Harlequin at the state ceremonies of the great barbarian379 and dignified chief. It is, however, indisputable that the professional, though perhaps not exactly the court fool, was known in Rome nearly two hundred years before the period of Attila. To do honour to the accession of Gallienus (when Valerian was alive, but a captive in Persia), numbers of Persian prisoners were paraded at the festival in Rome. At this festival, certain buffoons, we are told, committed an act of audacity for which the common crowd of spectators had not courage. They crossed over among the prisoners, and curiously380 and deliberately381 scanned the features of every man there. “Gallienus,” as I have noticed in ‘Monarchs Retired from Business,’ “expected some mirth, but seeing nothing come of it, and that the buffoons were retiring with a disconsolate382 look, he asked the meaning of the episode. ‘Well,’ said they, with a little hesitation, ‘we went over to these Persians to see if we might discover among them the great Valerian, your gracious divinity’s father.’ Gallienus thought this a very sorry joke indeed. He ordered the buffoons to be bound together, and to be burnt alive in one batch383. It was a very serious matter to joke with, and it was a mortal matter to joke against, this Emperor of Rome.”
39 We come to a later illustration in the Baron384 de Reiffenburg’s book (‘Le Lundi,’ p. 251), where it is stated that Theophilus, Emperor of Constantinople, found pleasure in witnessing the follies of a jester, Danderi, whose spirit of curiosity led him to the discovery that the Empress Theodora had little images in her oratory385 to which she prayed. The fool was not cunning in betraying the secret to the Iconoclast386 husband of Theodora. The Empress, more crafty, persuaded Theophilus that the images were only dolls, for the amusement of their children. So, at least, says the legend, which does discredit387 to the most accomplished of Eastern Emperors, though he had a hatred388 for trade, and a love for gaudy389 toys and jewellery.
Before leaving this part of my subject, let me notice another Court appendage390 from which ancient monarchs drew incentives391 to mirth,—namely, the Dwarfs393. These sometimes rank among the Moriones, and as they formed a portion of the Court household, parents often made dwarfs of their children, by stunting394 their growth, in order to obtain profit by them. The most clever exhibited their little prowess, in full armour395, in mimic fights which sometimes terminated seriously to the combatants, in wounds of certain gravity. Augustus did not disdain either to converse396, or gossip rather, and play at various games with them;—or to listen to them chattering and see them playing with each other. By some writers, this taste of Augustus is denied, but it may be believed, since of one dwarf392, Lucius, he had a statue sculptured, the eyes of which were of precious stones. That these little personages sometimes exercised great influence may be seen in a passage of the sixty-first chapter of the Tiberius (in Suetonius’s “Lives”), wherein it is said:—“A person of Consular319 dignity, in his Annals, has this passage, that at a great feast, where he himself was also present, the question was put suddenly and loudly to Tiberius by a dwarf, who was standing in waiting40 near the table among the dirty buffoons (‘inter copreas’), ‘Why Paconius, who had been condemned397 for treason, was still living?’” Suetonius adds indeed that the dwarf was sent to prison for being impertinent, but also that Tiberius, thus reminded of the existence of an enemy, sent orders to the Senate, that speedy care might be taken for his execution. Domitian was the Emperor who especially delighted in putting arms into the hands of his dwarfs, and setting them to pink out each other’s little lives. From the Court the fashion reached wealthy people generally, and Dio, in his ‘History of Rome,’ tells us of these small personages being kept by Roman ladies, in whose rooms they ran about all day long, and perfectly398 naked. The fashion did not cease till after the accession of Alexander Severus, who drove from his Court the whole tribe of dwarfs, male and female, and indeed other equally unseemly appendages399 to the household of a grave and dignified prince. They became matters of attraction to the mob, and being vulgar, are no more heard of in the palaces of kings and the mansions400 of nobles, till a later period and in highly civilized401 Christian courts. Let us do with them as Alexander Severus did, and consider now the condition of the more modern Court Fool, though in doing so we may have to look occasionally to a more remote antiquity than that at which I close this Chapter. It will perhaps be found that kings and their fools must, for a time, have had a rather pleasant time of it. “He,” so ran an old proverb quoted by Seneca, “he who thinks to achieve every object that enters his head, must either be a born king or a born fool.” Herein, it is supposed, is intimated the proximity402 in degrees of happiness of the respective individuals, who could neither be called to account for things done nor for words uttered.
点击收听单词发音
1 ass | |
n.驴;傻瓜,蠢笨的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 tract | |
n.传单,小册子,大片(土地或森林) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 hoarse | |
adj.嘶哑的,沙哑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 scatter | |
vt.撒,驱散,散开;散布/播;vi.分散,消散 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 witty | |
adj.机智的,风趣的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 complacent | |
adj.自满的;自鸣得意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 susceptible | |
adj.过敏的,敏感的;易动感情的,易受感动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 serene | |
adj. 安详的,宁静的,平静的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 deserted | |
adj.荒芜的,荒废的,无人的,被遗弃的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 shrine | |
n.圣地,神龛,庙;v.将...置于神龛内,把...奉为神圣 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 descend | |
vt./vi.传下来,下来,下降 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 requisite | |
adj.需要的,必不可少的;n.必需品 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 impending | |
a.imminent, about to come or happen | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 dwelling | |
n.住宅,住所,寓所 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 par | |
n.标准,票面价值,平均数量;adj.票面的,平常的,标准的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 drenched | |
adj.湿透的;充满的v.使湿透( drench的过去式和过去分词 );在某人(某物)上大量使用(某液体) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 thoroughly | |
adv.完全地,彻底地,十足地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 epithet | |
n.(用于褒贬人物等的)表述形容词,修饰语 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 pelted | |
(连续地)投掷( pelt的过去式和过去分词 ); 连续抨击; 攻击; 剥去…的皮 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 foul | |
adj.污秽的;邪恶的;v.弄脏;妨害;犯规;n.犯规 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 jaw | |
n.颚,颌,说教,流言蜚语;v.喋喋不休,教训 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 bruised | |
[医]青肿的,瘀紫的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 battered | |
adj.磨损的;v.连续猛击;磨损 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 deafened | |
使聋( deafen的过去式和过去分词 ); 使隔音 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 contrived | |
adj.不自然的,做作的;虚构的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 asses | |
n. 驴,愚蠢的人,臀部 adv. (常用作后置)用于贬损或骂人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 upwards | |
adv.向上,在更高处...以上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 vouchsafe | |
v.惠予,准许 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 deluge | |
n./vt.洪水,暴雨,使泛滥 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 peculiar | |
adj.古怪的,异常的;特殊的,特有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 thereby | |
adv.因此,从而 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 sage | |
n.圣人,哲人;adj.贤明的,明智的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 wittier | |
机智的,言辞巧妙的,情趣横生的( witty的比较级 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 eyelids | |
n.眼睑( eyelid的名词复数 );眼睛也不眨一下;不露声色;面不改色 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 frolicsome | |
adj.嬉戏的,闹着玩的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 bosom | |
n.胸,胸部;胸怀;内心;adj.亲密的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 hilarious | |
adj.充满笑声的,欢闹的;[反]depressed | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 accomplished | |
adj.有才艺的;有造诣的;达到了的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 instructor | |
n.指导者,教员,教练 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 Founder | |
n.创始者,缔造者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 monarch | |
n.帝王,君主,最高统治者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 majesties | |
n.雄伟( majesty的名词复数 );庄严;陛下;王权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 reigned | |
vi.当政,统治(reign的过去式形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 sublime | |
adj.崇高的,伟大的;极度的,不顾后果的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 immortals | |
不朽的人物( immortal的名词复数 ); 永生不朽者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 wincing | |
赶紧避开,畏缩( wince的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 folly | |
n.愚笨,愚蠢,蠢事,蠢行,傻话 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 deigned | |
v.屈尊,俯就( deign的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 irritable | |
adj.急躁的;过敏的;易怒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 irritability | |
n.易怒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 shafts | |
n.轴( shaft的名词复数 );(箭、高尔夫球棒等的)杆;通风井;一阵(疼痛、害怕等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 ridicule | |
v.讥讽,挖苦;n.嘲弄 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 anguish | |
n.(尤指心灵上的)极度痛苦,烦恼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 mansion | |
n.大厦,大楼;宅第 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 antithesis | |
n.对立;相对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 consort | |
v.相伴;结交 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 owls | |
n.猫头鹰( owl的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 attire | |
v.穿衣,装扮[同]array;n.衣着;盛装 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 gracefully | |
ad.大大方方地;优美地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60 graceful | |
adj.优美的,优雅的;得体的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61 fully | |
adv.完全地,全部地,彻底地;充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62 lustre | |
n.光亮,光泽;荣誉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63 vessel | |
n.船舶;容器,器皿;管,导管,血管 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64 censure | |
v./n.责备;非难;责难 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65 ailments | |
疾病(尤指慢性病),不适( ailment的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
66 Neptune | |
n.海王星 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
67 touching | |
adj.动人的,使人感伤的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
68 watery | |
adj.有水的,水汪汪的;湿的,湿润的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
69 censured | |
v.指责,非难,谴责( censure的过去式 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
70 crafty | |
adj.狡猾的,诡诈的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
71 worthy | |
adj.(of)值得的,配得上的;有价值的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
72 hoisted | |
把…吊起,升起( hoist的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
73 celestial | |
adj.天体的;天上的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
74 brewer | |
n. 啤酒制造者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
75 scent | |
n.气味,香味,香水,线索,嗅觉;v.嗅,发觉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
76 lumbering | |
n.采伐林木 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
77 efficiently | |
adv.高效率地,有能力地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
78 impunity | |
n.(惩罚、损失、伤害等的)免除 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
79 license | |
n.执照,许可证,特许;v.许可,特许 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
80 tyrant | |
n.暴君,专制的君主,残暴的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
81 tyrants | |
专制统治者( tyrant的名词复数 ); 暴君似的人; (古希腊的)僭主; 严酷的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
82 vying | |
adj.竞争的;比赛的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
83 licensed | |
adj.得到许可的v.许可,颁发执照(license的过去式和过去分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
84 perilous | |
adj.危险的,冒险的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
85 remarkable | |
adj.显著的,异常的,非凡的,值得注意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
86 potentates | |
n.君主,统治者( potentate的名词复数 );有权势的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
87 potentate | |
n.统治者;君主 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
88 utterly | |
adv.完全地,绝对地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
89 mortar | |
n.灰浆,灰泥;迫击炮;v.把…用灰浆涂接合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
90 pulp | |
n.果肉,纸浆;v.化成纸浆,除去...果肉,制成纸浆 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
91 saucy | |
adj.无礼的;俊俏的;活泼的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
92 spat | |
n.口角,掌击;v.发出呼噜呼噜声 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
93 mangled | |
vt.乱砍(mangle的过去式与过去分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
94 precisely | |
adv.恰好,正好,精确地,细致地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
95 pestles | |
n.(捣碎或碾磨用的)杵( pestle的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
96 bent | |
n.爱好,癖好;adj.弯的;决心的,一心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
97 virtue | |
n.德行,美德;贞操;优点;功效,效力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
98 dependence | |
n.依靠,依赖;信任,信赖;隶属 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
99 celebrated | |
adj.有名的,声誉卓著的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
100 vice | |
n.坏事;恶习;[pl.]台钳,老虎钳;adj.副的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
101 besieged | |
包围,围困,围攻( besiege的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
102 besieger | |
n. 围攻者, 围攻军 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
103 beheld | |
v.看,注视( behold的过去式和过去分词 );瞧;看呀;(叙述中用于引出某人意外的出现)哎哟 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
104 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
105 irresistible | |
adj.非常诱人的,无法拒绝的,无法抗拒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
106 conqueror | |
n.征服者,胜利者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
107 bard | |
n.吟游诗人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
108 condescended | |
屈尊,俯就( condescend的过去式和过去分词 ); 故意表示和蔼可亲 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
109 aspired | |
v.渴望,追求( aspire的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
110 parasite | |
n.寄生虫;寄生菌;食客 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
111 parasites | |
寄生物( parasite的名词复数 ); 靠他人为生的人; 诸虫 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
112 brass | |
n.黄铜;黄铜器,铜管乐器 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
113 patriots | |
爱国者,爱国主义者( patriot的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
114 audacity | |
n.大胆,卤莽,无礼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
115 sneaking | |
a.秘密的,不公开的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
116 cardinal | |
n.(天主教的)红衣主教;adj.首要的,基本的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
117 buffoon | |
n.演出时的丑角 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
118 joyous | |
adj.充满快乐的;令人高兴的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
119 bards | |
n.诗人( bard的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
120 scattered | |
adj.分散的,稀疏的;散步的;疏疏落落的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
121 eulogy | |
n.颂词;颂扬 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
122 monarchs | |
君主,帝王( monarch的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
123 naval | |
adj.海军的,军舰的,船的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
124 demon | |
n.魔鬼,恶魔 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
125 afflicted | |
使受痛苦,折磨( afflict的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
126 consolation | |
n.安慰,慰问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
127 contemplating | |
深思,细想,仔细考虑( contemplate的现在分词 ); 注视,凝视; 考虑接受(发生某事的可能性); 深思熟虑,沉思,苦思冥想 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
128 apparently | |
adv.显然地;表面上,似乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
129 Christian | |
adj.基督教徒的;n.基督教徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
130 defunct | |
adj.死亡的;已倒闭的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
131 voluptuousness | |
n.风骚,体态丰满 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
132 sect | |
n.派别,宗教,学派,派系 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
133 thigh | |
n.大腿;股骨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
134 philosophic | |
adj.哲学的,贤明的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
135 envoy | |
n.使节,使者,代表,公使 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
136 indifference | |
n.不感兴趣,不关心,冷淡,不在乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
137 groans | |
n.呻吟,叹息( groan的名词复数 );呻吟般的声音v.呻吟( groan的第三人称单数 );发牢骚;抱怨;受苦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
138 heartily | |
adv.衷心地,诚恳地,十分,很 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
139 follies | |
罪恶,时事讽刺剧; 愚蠢,蠢笨,愚蠢的行为、思想或做法( folly的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
140 disdain | |
n.鄙视,轻视;v.轻视,鄙视,不屑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
141 engrave | |
vt.(在...上)雕刻,使铭记,使牢记 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
142 holders | |
支持物( holder的名词复数 ); 持有者; (支票等)持有人; 支托(或握持)…之物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
143 lodge | |
v.临时住宿,寄宿,寄存,容纳;n.传达室,小旅馆 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
144 facetious | |
adj.轻浮的,好开玩笑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
145 carving | |
n.雕刻品,雕花 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
146 simplicity | |
n.简单,简易;朴素;直率,单纯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
147 elegance | |
n.优雅;优美,雅致;精致,巧妙 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
148 admiration | |
n.钦佩,赞美,羡慕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
149 mere | |
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
150 platonic | |
adj.精神的;柏拉图(哲学)的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
151 antiquity | |
n.古老;高龄;古物,古迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
152 applied | |
adj.应用的;v.应用,适用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
153 oracle | |
n.神谕,神谕处,预言 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
154 sprightly | |
adj.愉快的,活泼的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
155 pointed | |
adj.尖的,直截了当的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
156 tickle | |
v.搔痒,胳肢;使高兴;发痒;n.搔痒,发痒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
157 tickled | |
(使)发痒( tickle的过去式和过去分词 ); (使)愉快,逗乐 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
158 esteemed | |
adj.受人尊敬的v.尊敬( esteem的过去式和过去分词 );敬重;认为;以为 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
159 vocation | |
n.职业,行业 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
160 melancholy | |
n.忧郁,愁思;adj.令人感伤(沮丧)的,忧郁的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
161 arbiter | |
n.仲裁人,公断人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
162 veins | |
n.纹理;矿脉( vein的名词复数 );静脉;叶脉;纹理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
163 feigning | |
假装,伪装( feign的现在分词 ); 捏造(借口、理由等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
164 indited | |
v.写(文章,信等)创作,赋诗,创作( indite的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
165 patriotic | |
adj.爱国的,有爱国心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
166 taxation | |
n.征税,税收,税金 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
167 revert | |
v.恢复,复归,回到 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
168 rosy | |
adj.美好的,乐观的,玫瑰色的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
169 dignified | |
a.可敬的,高贵的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
170 anatomies | |
n.解剖( anatomy的名词复数 );(详细的)分析;(生物体的)解剖结构;人体 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
171 effigy | |
n.肖像 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
172 patronage | |
n.赞助,支援,援助;光顾,捧场 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
173 patrician | |
adj.贵族的,显贵的;n.贵族;有教养的人;罗马帝国的地方官 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
174 orations | |
n.(正式仪式中的)演说,演讲( oration的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
175 rites | |
仪式,典礼( rite的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
176 nettled | |
v.拿荨麻打,拿荨麻刺(nettle的过去式与过去分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
177 exquisite | |
adj.精美的;敏锐的;剧烈的,感觉强烈的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
178 possessed | |
adj.疯狂的;拥有的,占有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
179 stolid | |
adj.无动于衷的,感情麻木的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
180 disposition | |
n.性情,性格;意向,倾向;排列,部署 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
181 dispositions | |
安排( disposition的名词复数 ); 倾向; (财产、金钱的)处置; 气质 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
182 delightful | |
adj.令人高兴的,使人快乐的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
183 complacently | |
adv. 满足地, 自满地, 沾沾自喜地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
184 vouchsafed | |
v.给予,赐予( vouchsafe的过去式和过去分词 );允诺 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
185 narrated | |
v.故事( narrate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
186 ignobly | |
卑贱地,下流地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
187 pecuniarily | |
adv.在金钱上,在金钱方面 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
188 hesitation | |
n.犹豫,踌躇 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
189 villa | |
n.别墅,城郊小屋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
190 impudence | |
n.厚颜无耻;冒失;无礼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
191 inclination | |
n.倾斜;点头;弯腰;斜坡;倾度;倾向;爱好 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
192 affected | |
adj.不自然的,假装的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
193 risible | |
adj.能笑的;可笑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
194 hoop | |
n.(篮球)篮圈,篮 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
195 thighs | |
n.股,大腿( thigh的名词复数 );食用的鸡(等的)腿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
196 constable | |
n.(英国)警察,警官 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
197 forfeited | |
(因违反协议、犯规、受罚等)丧失,失去( forfeit的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
198 poised | |
a.摆好姿势不动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
199 peals | |
n.(声音大而持续或重复的)洪亮的响声( peal的名词复数 );隆隆声;洪亮的钟声;钟乐v.(使)(钟等)鸣响,(雷等)发出隆隆声( peal的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
200 sages | |
n.圣人( sage的名词复数 );智者;哲人;鼠尾草(可用作调料) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
201 standing | |
n.持续,地位;adj.永久的,不动的,直立的,不流动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
202 repose | |
v.(使)休息;n.安息 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
203 dexterous | |
adj.灵敏的;灵巧的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
204 piquing | |
v.伤害…的自尊心( pique的现在分词 );激起(好奇心) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
205 tragic | |
adj.悲剧的,悲剧性的,悲惨的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
206 misery | |
n.痛苦,苦恼,苦难;悲惨的境遇,贫苦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
207 extricate | |
v.拯救,救出;解脱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
208 winks | |
v.使眼色( wink的第三人称单数 );递眼色(表示友好或高兴等);(指光)闪烁;闪亮 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
209 soliciting | |
v.恳求( solicit的现在分词 );(指娼妇)拉客;索求;征求 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
210 judgment | |
n.审判;判断力,识别力,看法,意见 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
211 chattering | |
n. (机器振动发出的)咔嗒声,(鸟等)鸣,啁啾 adj. 喋喋不休的,啾啾声的 动词chatter的现在分词形式 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
212 graphic | |
adj.生动的,形象的,绘画的,文字的,图表的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
213 sketch | |
n.草图;梗概;素描;v.素描;概述 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
214 depicted | |
描绘,描画( depict的过去式和过去分词 ); 描述 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
215 enjoyment | |
n.乐趣;享有;享用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
216 professed | |
公开声称的,伪称的,已立誓信教的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
217 mountebank | |
n.江湖郎中;骗子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
218 dealing | |
n.经商方法,待人态度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
219 previously | |
adv.以前,先前(地) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
220 spouses | |
n.配偶,夫或妻( spouse的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
221 homage | |
n.尊敬,敬意,崇敬 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
222 drolly | |
adv.古里古怪地;滑稽地;幽默地;诙谐地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
223 justified | |
a.正当的,有理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
224 buffoons | |
n.愚蠢的人( buffoon的名词复数 );傻瓜;逗乐小丑;滑稽的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
225 originality | |
n.创造力,独创性;新颖 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
226 tavern | |
n.小旅馆,客栈;小酒店 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
227 convivial | |
adj.狂欢的,欢乐的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
228 chapel | |
n.小教堂,殡仪馆 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
229 witticisms | |
n.妙语,俏皮话( witticism的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
230 grasshopper | |
n.蚱蜢,蝗虫,蚂蚱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
231 longing | |
n.(for)渴望 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
232 sterling | |
adj.英币的(纯粹的,货真价实的);n.英国货币(英镑) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
233 stereotyped | |
adj.(指形象、思想、人物等)模式化的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
234 derisively | |
adv. 嘲笑地,嘲弄地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
235 retailers | |
零售商,零售店( retailer的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
236 mimic | |
v.模仿,戏弄;n.模仿他人言行的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
237 risibility | |
n.爱笑,幽默感 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
238 mimics | |
n.模仿名人言行的娱乐演员,滑稽剧演员( mimic的名词复数 );善于模仿的人或物v.(尤指为了逗乐而)模仿( mimic的第三人称单数 );酷似 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
239 mimicry | |
n.(生物)拟态,模仿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
240 excellence | |
n.优秀,杰出,(pl.)优点,美德 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
241 treatise | |
n.专著;(专题)论文 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
242 vanquished | |
v.征服( vanquish的过去式和过去分词 );战胜;克服;抑制 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
243 extravagant | |
adj.奢侈的;过分的;(言行等)放肆的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
244 proprietor | |
n.所有人;业主;经营者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
245 deriving | |
v.得到( derive的现在分词 );(从…中)得到获得;源于;(从…中)提取 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
246 humbug | |
n.花招,谎话,欺骗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
247 circumlocution | |
n. 绕圈子的话,迂回累赘的陈述 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
248 abounds | |
v.大量存在,充满,富于( abound的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
249 distinguished | |
adj.卓越的,杰出的,著名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
250 vices | |
缺陷( vice的名词复数 ); 恶习; 不道德行为; 台钳 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
251 mimicked | |
v.(尤指为了逗乐而)模仿( mimic的过去式和过去分词 );酷似 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
252 satirizing | |
v.讽刺,讥讽( satirize的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
253 illustrate | |
v.举例说明,阐明;图解,加插图 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
254 satirist | |
n.讽刺诗作者,讽刺家,爱挖苦别人的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
255 satire | |
n.讽刺,讽刺文学,讽刺作品 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
256 braying | |
v.发出驴叫似的声音( bray的现在分词 );发嘟嘟声;粗声粗气地讲话(或大笑);猛击 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
257 pelting | |
微不足道的,无价值的,盛怒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
258 burlesques | |
n.滑稽模仿( burlesque的名词复数 );(包括脱衣舞的)滑稽歌舞杂剧v.(嘲弄地)模仿,(通过模仿)取笑( burlesque的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
259 mythology | |
n.神话,神话学,神话集 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
260 conspiracy | |
n.阴谋,密谋,共谋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
261 personalities | |
n. 诽谤,(对某人容貌、性格等所进行的)人身攻击; 人身攻击;人格, 个性, 名人( personality的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
262 brace | |
n. 支柱,曲柄,大括号; v. 绷紧,顶住,(为困难或坏事)做准备 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
263 gallant | |
adj.英勇的,豪侠的;(向女人)献殷勤的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
264 cavalry | |
n.骑兵;轻装甲部队 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
265 brazen | |
adj.厚脸皮的,无耻的,坚硬的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
266 javelin | |
n.标枪,投枪 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
267 figs | |
figures 数字,图形,外形 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
268 mischief | |
n.损害,伤害,危害;恶作剧,捣蛋,胡闹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
269 spartans | |
n.斯巴达(spartan的复数形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
270 heed | |
v.注意,留意;n.注意,留心 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
271 envoys | |
使节( envoy的名词复数 ); 公使; 谈判代表; 使节身份 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
272 trenchant | |
adj.尖刻的,清晰的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
273 sneering | |
嘲笑的,轻蔑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
274 sprightliness | |
n.愉快,快活 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
275 ridicules | |
n.嘲笑( ridicule的名词复数 );奚落;嘲弄;戏弄v.嘲笑,嘲弄,奚落( ridicule的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
276 deities | |
n.神,女神( deity的名词复数 );神祗;神灵;神明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
277 appellation | |
n.名称,称呼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
278 illustrates | |
给…加插图( illustrate的第三人称单数 ); 说明; 表明; (用示例、图画等)说明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
279 recollected | |
adj.冷静的;镇定的;被回忆起的;沉思默想的v.记起,想起( recollect的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
280 immunities | |
免除,豁免( immunity的名词复数 ); 免疫力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
281 humane | |
adj.人道的,富有同情心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
282 imbibe | |
v.喝,饮;吸入,吸收 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
283 frantic | |
adj.狂乱的,错乱的,激昂的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
284 calamity | |
n.灾害,祸患,不幸事件 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
285 wont | |
adj.习惯于;v.习惯;n.习惯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
286 tirades | |
激烈的长篇指责或演说( tirade的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
287 bombastic | |
adj.夸夸其谈的,言过其实的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
288 astounded | |
v.使震惊(astound的过去式和过去分词);愕然;愕;惊讶 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
289 imposing | |
adj.使人难忘的,壮丽的,堂皇的,雄伟的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
290 confidentially | |
ad.秘密地,悄悄地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
291 hardy | |
adj.勇敢的,果断的,吃苦的;耐寒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
292 rendezvous | |
n.约会,约会地点,汇合点;vi.汇合,集合;vt.使汇合,使在汇合地点相遇 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
293 procure | |
vt.获得,取得,促成;vi.拉皮条 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
294 costly | |
adj.昂贵的,价值高的,豪华的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
295 petitioners | |
n.请求人,请愿人( petitioner的名词复数 );离婚案原告 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
296 commissioner | |
n.(政府厅、局、处等部门)专员,长官,委员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
297 philosophical | |
adj.哲学家的,哲学上的,达观的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
298 enacted | |
制定(法律),通过(法案)( enact的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
299 insolence | |
n.傲慢;无礼;厚颜;傲慢的态度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
300 courteous | |
adj.彬彬有礼的,客气的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
301 pone | |
n.玉米饼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
302 pedagogues | |
n.教师,卖弄学问的教师( pedagogue的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
303 paradoxes | |
n.似非而是的隽语,看似矛盾而实际却可能正确的说法( paradox的名词复数 );用于语言文学中的上述隽语;有矛盾特点的人[事物,情况] | |
参考例句: |
|
|
304 mentor | |
n.指导者,良师益友;v.指导 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
305 virtues | |
美德( virtue的名词复数 ); 德行; 优点; 长处 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
306 frugal | |
adj.节俭的,节约的,少量的,微量的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
307 consul | |
n.领事;执政官 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
308 recital | |
n.朗诵,独奏会,独唱会 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
309 comedians | |
n.喜剧演员,丑角( comedian的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
310 luxurious | |
adj.精美而昂贵的;豪华的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
311 conceited | |
adj.自负的,骄傲自满的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
312 slain | |
杀死,宰杀,杀戮( slay的过去分词 ); (slay的过去分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
313 pompously | |
adv.傲慢地,盛大壮观地;大模大样 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
314 insolent | |
adj.傲慢的,无理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
315 followers | |
追随者( follower的名词复数 ); 用户; 契据的附面; 从动件 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
316 retinue | |
n.侍从;随员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
317 derived | |
vi.起源;由来;衍生;导出v.得到( derive的过去式和过去分词 );(从…中)得到获得;源于;(从…中)提取 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
318 scurrilous | |
adj.下流的,恶意诽谤的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
319 consular | |
a.领事的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
320 sarcasms | |
n.讥讽,讽刺,挖苦( sarcasm的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
321 penetrating | |
adj.(声音)响亮的,尖锐的adj.(气味)刺激的adj.(思想)敏锐的,有洞察力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
322 marred | |
adj. 被损毁, 污损的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
323 wiles | |
n.(旨在欺骗或吸引人的)诡计,花招;欺骗,欺诈( wile的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
324 licentious | |
adj.放纵的,淫乱的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
325 licentiously | |
adv.licentious(放荡的)的变形 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
326 chides | |
v.责骂,责备( chide的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
327 precept | |
n.戒律;格言 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
328 grunting | |
咕哝的,呼噜的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
329 justify | |
vt.证明…正当(或有理),为…辩护 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
330 dreary | |
adj.令人沮丧的,沉闷的,单调乏味的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
331 puny | |
adj.微不足道的,弱小的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
332 insignificance | |
n.不重要;无价值;无意义 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
333 colossal | |
adj.异常的,庞大的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
334 abdicated | |
放弃(职责、权力等)( abdicate的过去式和过去分词 ); 退位,逊位 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
335 retirement | |
n.退休,退职 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
336 hearth | |
n.壁炉炉床,壁炉地面 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
337 errs | |
犯错误,做错事( err的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
338 allusion | |
n.暗示,间接提示 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
339 filch | |
v.偷窃 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
340 martial | |
adj.战争的,军事的,尚武的,威武的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
341 quaint | |
adj.古雅的,离奇有趣的,奇怪的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
342 formerly | |
adv.从前,以前 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
343 severely | |
adv.严格地;严厉地;非常恶劣地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
344 inviting | |
adj.诱人的,引人注目的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
345 posture | |
n.姿势,姿态,心态,态度;v.作出某种姿势 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
346 retired | |
adj.隐退的,退休的,退役的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
347 stiffened | |
加强的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
348 vengeance | |
n.报复,报仇,复仇 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
349 frolicsomeness | |
参考例句: |
|
|
350 knave | |
n.流氓;(纸牌中的)杰克 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
351 arena | |
n.竞技场,运动场所;竞争场所,舞台 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
352 hilarity | |
n.欢乐;热闹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
353 extolled | |
v.赞颂,赞扬,赞美( extol的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
354 monstrous | |
adj.巨大的;恐怖的;可耻的,丢脸的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
355 hideous | |
adj.丑陋的,可憎的,可怕的,恐怖的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
356 chambers | |
n.房间( chamber的名词复数 );(议会的)议院;卧室;会议厅 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
357 forum | |
n.论坛,讨论会 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
358 frightful | |
adj.可怕的;讨厌的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
359 specimens | |
n.样品( specimen的名词复数 );范例;(化验的)抽样;某种类型的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
360 mania | |
n.疯狂;躁狂症,狂热,癖好 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
361 exonerated | |
v.使免罪,免除( exonerate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
362 prodigal | |
adj.浪费的,挥霍的,放荡的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
363 nay | |
adv.不;n.反对票,投反对票者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
364 squire | |
n.护卫, 侍从, 乡绅 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
365 stimulant | |
n.刺激物,兴奋剂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
366 wittiest | |
机智的,言辞巧妙的,情趣横生的( witty的最高级 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
367 solace | |
n.安慰;v.使快乐;vt.安慰(物),缓和 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
368 jaws | |
n.口部;嘴 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
369 fixed | |
adj.固定的,不变的,准备好的;(计算机)固定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
370 corpse | |
n.尸体,死尸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
371 warriors | |
武士,勇士,战士( warrior的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
372 moorish | |
adj.沼地的,荒野的,生[住]在沼地的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
373 deformed | |
adj.畸形的;变形的;丑的,破相了的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
374 unintelligible | |
adj.无法了解的,难解的,莫明其妙的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
375 resounded | |
v.(指声音等)回荡于某处( resound的过去式和过去分词 );产生回响;(指某处)回荡着声音 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
376 intemperate | |
adj.无节制的,放纵的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
377 countenance | |
n.脸色,面容;面部表情;vt.支持,赞同 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
378 inflexible | |
adj.不可改变的,不受影响的,不屈服的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
379 barbarian | |
n.野蛮人;adj.野蛮(人)的;未开化的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
380 curiously | |
adv.有求知欲地;好问地;奇特地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
381 deliberately | |
adv.审慎地;蓄意地;故意地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
382 disconsolate | |
adj.忧郁的,不快的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
383 batch | |
n.一批(组,群);一批生产量 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
384 baron | |
n.男爵;(商业界等)巨头,大王 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
385 oratory | |
n.演讲术;词藻华丽的言辞 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
386 iconoclast | |
n.反对崇拜偶像者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
387 discredit | |
vt.使不可置信;n.丧失信义;不信,怀疑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
388 hatred | |
n.憎恶,憎恨,仇恨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
389 gaudy | |
adj.华而不实的;俗丽的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
390 appendage | |
n.附加物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
391 incentives | |
激励某人做某事的事物( incentive的名词复数 ); 刺激; 诱因; 动机 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
392 dwarf | |
n.矮子,侏儒,矮小的动植物;vt.使…矮小 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
393 dwarfs | |
n.侏儒,矮子(dwarf的复数形式)vt.(使)显得矮小(dwarf的第三人称单数形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
394 stunting | |
v.阻碍…发育[生长],抑制,妨碍( stunt的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
395 armour | |
(=armor)n.盔甲;装甲部队 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
396 converse | |
vi.谈话,谈天,闲聊;adv.相反的,相反 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
397 condemned | |
adj. 被责难的, 被宣告有罪的 动词condemn的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
398 perfectly | |
adv.完美地,无可非议地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
399 appendages | |
n.附属物( appendage的名词复数 );依附的人;附属器官;附属肢体(如臂、腿、尾等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
400 mansions | |
n.宅第,公馆,大厦( mansion的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
401 civilized | |
a.有教养的,文雅的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
402 proximity | |
n.接近,邻近 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |