The Christian1 World is distinguished2 among religious journals by a certain breadth and vigor3. On all social and political subjects it is remarkably4 advanced and outspoken6, and its treatment of theological questions is far more liberal and intelligent than sceptics would expect. Of late years it has opened its columns to correspondence on many topics, some of a watery7 character, like the reality of Noah's flood, and others of a burning kind, like the doctrine8 of eternal punishment, on all of which great freedom of expression has been allowed. The editor himself, who is, we suspect, far more sceptical than most of his readers, has had his say on the question of Hell, and it is to be inferred from his somewhat guarded utterance9 that he has little belief in any such place. This, however, we state with considerable hesitation10, for the majority of Christians11 still regard the doctrine of everlasting12 torture as indubitable and sacred, and we have no desire to lower him in the estimation of the Christian world in which he labors13, or to cast a doubt on the orthodoxy of his creed14. But the editor will not take it amiss if we insist that his paper is liberal in its Christianity, and unusually tolerant of unbelief.
Yet, while entitled to praise on his ground, the Christian World deserves something else than praise on another. It has recently published a series of articles for the purpose of stimulating15 faith and allaying16 doubt. If undertaken by a competent writer, able and willing to face the mighty17 difference between Christianity and the scientific spirit of our age, such a series of articles might be well worth reading. We might then admire if we could not agree, and derive18 benefit from friendly contact with an antagonist19 mind. But the writer selected for the task appears to possess neither of these qualifications. Instead of thinking he gushes20; instead of reason he supplies us with unlimited21 sentiment. We expect to tread solid ground, or at least to find it not perilously22 soft; and lo! the soil is moist, and now and then we find ourselves up to the knees in unctuous23 mud. How difficult it is nowadays to discover a really argumentative Christian! The eminent24 favorites of orthodoxy write sentimental25 romances and call them "Lives of Christ," and preach sermons with no conceivable relation to the human intellect; while the apologists of faith imitate the tactics of the cuttle-fish, and when pursued cast out their opaque26 fluid of sentimentality to conceal27 their position. They mostly dabble28 in the shallows of scepticism, never daring to venture in the deeps; and what they take pride in as flashes of spiritual light resembles neither the royal gleaming of the sun nor the milder radiance of the moon, but rather the phosphorescence of corruption29.
In the last article of the series referred to, entitled "Thou art a God that Hidest Thyself," there is an abundance of fictitious30 emotion and spurious rhetoric31. From beginning to end there is a painful strain that never relaxes, reminding us of singers who pitch their voices too high and have to render all the upper notes in falsetto. An attempt is made to employ poetical32 imagery, but it ludicrously fails. The heaven of the Book of Revelation, with its gold and silver and precious stones, is nothing but a magnified jeweller's shop, and a study of it has influenced the style of later writers. At present Christian gushers33 have descended34 still lower, dealing35 not even in gold and jewels, but in Brummagem and paste. The word gem36 is greatly in vogue37. Talmage uses it about twenty times in every lecture, Parker delights in it, and it often figures on the pages of serious books. In the article before us it is made to do frequent service. A promise of redemption is represented as shining gem-like on the brow of Revelation, Elims gem the dark bosom38 of the universal desert, and the morning gleams on the dew-gemmed earth. Perhaps a good recipe for this kind of composition would be an hour's gloat on the flaming window of a jeweller's shop in the West End.
But let us deal with the purport39 and purpose of the article. It aims at showing that God hides himself, and why he does so. The fact which it is attempted to explain none will deny. Moses ascended40 Mount Sinai to see God and converse41 with him, Abraham and God walked and talked together, and according to St. Paul the Almighty42 is not far from any one of us. But the modern mind is not prone43 to believe these things. The empire of reason has been enlarged at the expense of faith, whose provinces have one after another been annexed44 until only a small territory is left her, and that she finds it difficult to keep. Coincidently, God has become less and less a reality and more and more a dream. The reign45 of law is perceived everywhere, and all classes of phenomena46 may be explained without recourse to supernatural power. When Napoleon objected to Laplace that divine design was omitted from his mechanical theory of the universe, the French philosopher characteristically replied: "I had no need of that hypothesis." And the same disposition47 prevails in other departments of science. Darwin, for instance, undertakes to explain the origin and development of man, physical, intellectual and moral, without assuming any cause other than those which obtain wherever life exists. God is being slowly but surely driven from the domain48 of intermediate causes, and transformed into an ultimate cause, a mere49 figment of the imagination. He is being banished50 from nature into that poetical region inhabited by the gods of Polytheism, to keep company there with Jupiter and Apollo and Neptune51 and Juno and Venus, and all the rest of that glorious Pantheon. He no longer rules the actual life and struggle of the world, but lives at peace with his old rivals in—
Where never creeps a cloud or moves a wind,
Nor ever falls the least white star of snow,
Nor ever lowest roll of thunder moans;
Their sacred everlasting calm." *
* Tennyson: "Lucretius."
The essence of all this is admitted by the writer in the Christian World; he admits the facts, but denies the inference. They show us one of God's ways of hiding himself. Order prevails, but it is the expression of God's will, and not a mere result of the working of material forces. He operates by method, not by caprice, and hence the unchanging stability of things. While doing nothing in particular, he does everything in general. And this idea must be extended to human history. God endows man with powers, and allows him freedom to employ them as he will. But, strangely enough, God has a way of "ruling our freedom," and always there is "a restraining and restoring hand." How man's will can be free and yet overruled passes our merely carnal understanding, although it may be intelligible53 enough to minds steeped in the mysteries of theology. According to this writer, God's government of mankind is a "constitutional kingdom." Quite so. It was once arbitrary and despotic; now it is far milder and less exacting54, having dwindled55 into the "constitutional" stage, wherein the King reigns56 but does not govern. Will the law of human growth and divine decay stop here? We think not. As the despotism has changed to a constitutional monarchy57, so that will change to a republic, and the empty throne be preserved among other curious relics58 of the past.
God also hides himself in history. Although unapparent on the surface of events, his spirit is potent59 within them. "What," the writer asks, "is history—with all its dark passages of horror, its stormy revolutions, its ceaseless conflict, its tears, its groans60, its blood—but the chronicle of an ever-widening realm of light, of order, of intelligence, wisdom, truth, and charity?" But if we admit the progress, we need not explain it as the work of God. Bunsen wrote a book on "God in History," which a profane61 wag said should have been called "Bunsen in History;" yet his attempt to justify62 the ways of God to men was not very successful. It is simply a mockery to ask us to believe that the slow progress of humanity must be attributed to omniscient63 omnipotence64. A God who can evolve virtue65 and happiness only out of infinite evil and misery66, and elevate us only through the agency of perpetual blood and tears, is scarcely a being to be loved and worshipped, unless we assume that his power and wisdom are exceedingly limited. Are we to suppose that God has woven himself a garment of violence, evil, and deceit, in order that we might not see too clearly his righteousness, goodness, and truth?
It must further be observed that Christian Theists cannot be permitted to ascribe all the good in the world to God, and all the evil to man, or else leave it absolutely unexplained. In the name of humanity we protest against this indignity67 to our race. Let God be responsible for good and evil both, or for neither; and if man is to consider himself chargeable with all the world's wrong, he should at least be allowed credit for all the compensating68 good.
The theory of evolution is being patronised by Theists rather too fulsomely69. Not long ago they treated it with obloquy70 and contempt, but now they endeavor to use it as an argument for their faith, and in doing so they distort language as only theological controversialists can. Changing "survival of the fittest" into "survival of the best," they transform a physical fact into a moral law; and thus, as they think, take a new north-west passage to the old harbor of "whatever is is right." But while-evolution may be construed71 as progress, which some would contest, it cannot be construed as the invariable survival of the best; nor, if it were, could the process by which this result is achieved be justified72. For evolution works through a universal struggle for existence, in which the life and well-being73 of some can be secured only through the suffering and final extinction74 of others; and even in its higher stages, cunning and unscrupulous strength frequently overcomes humane75 wisdom fettered76 by weakness. "Nature, red in tooth and claw, with ravin shrieks77 against the creed" of the Theist. If God is working through evolution, we must admit that he has marvellously hidden himself, and agree with the poet that he does "move in a mysterious way his wonders to perform."
The writer in the Christian World borrows an image from the puling scepticism of "In Memoriam," which describes man as
"An infant crying in the night,
And with no language but a cry."
This image of the infant is put to strange use. The writer says that God is necessarily hidden from us because we can grasp "his inscrutable nature and methods" only as "an infant can grasp the thought and purpose of a man." Similes78 are dangerous things. When it is demanded that they shall run upon all fours, they often turn against their masters. This one does so. The infant grows into a man in due course, and then he can not only grasp the thought and purpose of his father, but also, it may be, comprehend still greater things. Will the infant mind of man, when it reaches maturity79, be thus related to God's? If not, the analogy is fallacious. Man is quite mature enough already, and has been so for thousands of years, to understand something of God's thought and purpose if he had only chosen to reveal them. This, however, if there be a God, he has not condescended80 to do. An appeal to the various pretended revelations of the world serves to convince us that all are the words of fallible men. Their very discord81 discredits82 them. As D'Holbach said, if God had spoken, the universe would surely be convinced, and the same conviction would fill every breast.
The reason given for God's hiding himself is very curious. "If," says the writer, "the way of God were not in large measure hidden, it would mean that we could survey all things from the height and the depth of God." Truly an awful contemplation! May it not be that God is hidden from us because there is none to be revealed, that "all the oracles83 are dumb or cheat because they have no secret to express"?
But, says the writer in the Christian World, there is one revelation of God that can never be gainsaid84; "while the Cross stands as earth's most sacred symbol, there can be no utter hiding of his love." This, however, we venture to dispute. That Cross which was laid upon the back of Jesus poor mankind has been compelled to carry ever since, with no Simon to ease it of the load. Jesus was crucified on Calvary, and in his name man has suffered centuries of crucifixion. The immolation85 of Jesus can be no revelation of God's love. If the Nazarene was God, his crucifixion involves a complicated arrangement for murder; the Jews who demanded his death were divinely instigated86, and Judas Iscariot was pre-ordained to betray his master; in which case his treachery was a necessary element of the drama, entitling him not to vituperation but to gratitude87, even perhaps to the monument which Benjamin Disraeli suggested as his proper reward. Looking also at the history of Christianity, and seeing how the Cross has sheltered oppressors of mind and body, sanctioned immeasurable shedding of blood, and frightened peoples from freedom, while even now it symbolises all that is reactionary88 and accursed in Europe, we are constrained89 to say that the love it reveals is as noxious90 as the vilest91 hate.
点击收听单词发音
1 Christian | |
adj.基督教徒的;n.基督教徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 distinguished | |
adj.卓越的,杰出的,著名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 vigor | |
n.活力,精力,元气 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 remarkably | |
ad.不同寻常地,相当地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 mar | |
vt.破坏,毁坏,弄糟 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 outspoken | |
adj.直言无讳的,坦率的,坦白无隐的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 watery | |
adj.有水的,水汪汪的;湿的,湿润的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 doctrine | |
n.教义;主义;学说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 utterance | |
n.用言语表达,话语,言语 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 hesitation | |
n.犹豫,踌躇 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 Christians | |
n.基督教徒( Christian的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 everlasting | |
adj.永恒的,持久的,无止境的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 labors | |
v.努力争取(for)( labor的第三人称单数 );苦干;详细分析;(指引擎)缓慢而困难地运转 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 creed | |
n.信条;信念,纲领 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 stimulating | |
adj.有启发性的,能激发人思考的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 allaying | |
v.减轻,缓和( allay的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 mighty | |
adj.强有力的;巨大的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 derive | |
v.取得;导出;引申;来自;源自;出自 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 antagonist | |
n.敌人,对抗者,对手 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 gushes | |
n.涌出,迸发( gush的名词复数 )v.喷,涌( gush的第三人称单数 );滔滔不绝地说话 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 unlimited | |
adj.无限的,不受控制的,无条件的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 perilously | |
adv.充满危险地,危机四伏地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 unctuous | |
adj.油腔滑调的,大胆的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 eminent | |
adj.显赫的,杰出的,有名的,优良的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 sentimental | |
adj.多愁善感的,感伤的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 opaque | |
adj.不透光的;不反光的,不传导的;晦涩的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 conceal | |
v.隐藏,隐瞒,隐蔽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 dabble | |
v.涉足,浅赏 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 corruption | |
n.腐败,堕落,贪污 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 fictitious | |
adj.虚构的,假设的;空头的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 rhetoric | |
n.修辞学,浮夸之言语 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 poetical | |
adj.似诗人的;诗一般的;韵文的;富有诗意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 gushers | |
n.喷油井( gusher的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 descended | |
a.为...后裔的,出身于...的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 dealing | |
n.经商方法,待人态度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 gem | |
n.宝石,珠宝;受爱戴的人 [同]jewel | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 Vogue | |
n.时髦,时尚;adj.流行的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 bosom | |
n.胸,胸部;胸怀;内心;adj.亲密的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 purport | |
n.意义,要旨,大要;v.意味著,做为...要旨,要领是... | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 ascended | |
v.上升,攀登( ascend的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 converse | |
vi.谈话,谈天,闲聊;adv.相反的,相反 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 almighty | |
adj.全能的,万能的;很大的,很强的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 prone | |
adj.(to)易于…的,很可能…的;俯卧的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 annexed | |
[法] 附加的,附属的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 reign | |
n.统治时期,统治,支配,盛行;v.占优势 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 phenomena | |
n.现象 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 disposition | |
n.性情,性格;意向,倾向;排列,部署 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 domain | |
n.(活动等)领域,范围;领地,势力范围 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 mere | |
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 banished | |
v.放逐,驱逐( banish的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 Neptune | |
n.海王星 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 lucid | |
adj.明白易懂的,清晰的,头脑清楚的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 intelligible | |
adj.可理解的,明白易懂的,清楚的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 exacting | |
adj.苛求的,要求严格的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 dwindled | |
v.逐渐变少或变小( dwindle的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 reigns | |
n.君主的统治( reign的名词复数 );君主统治时期;任期;当政期 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 monarchy | |
n.君主,最高统治者;君主政体,君主国 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 relics | |
[pl.]n.遗物,遗迹,遗产;遗体,尸骸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 potent | |
adj.强有力的,有权势的;有效力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60 groans | |
n.呻吟,叹息( groan的名词复数 );呻吟般的声音v.呻吟( groan的第三人称单数 );发牢骚;抱怨;受苦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61 profane | |
adj.亵神的,亵渎的;vt.亵渎,玷污 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62 justify | |
vt.证明…正当(或有理),为…辩护 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63 omniscient | |
adj.无所不知的;博识的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64 omnipotence | |
n.全能,万能,无限威力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65 virtue | |
n.德行,美德;贞操;优点;功效,效力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
66 misery | |
n.痛苦,苦恼,苦难;悲惨的境遇,贫苦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
67 indignity | |
n.侮辱,伤害尊严,轻蔑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
68 compensating | |
补偿,补助,修正 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
69 fulsomely | |
参考例句: |
|
|
70 obloquy | |
n.斥责,大骂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
71 construed | |
v.解释(陈述、行为等)( construe的过去式和过去分词 );翻译,作句法分析 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
72 justified | |
a.正当的,有理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
73 well-being | |
n.安康,安乐,幸福 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
74 extinction | |
n.熄灭,消亡,消灭,灭绝,绝种 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
75 humane | |
adj.人道的,富有同情心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
76 fettered | |
v.给…上脚镣,束缚( fetter的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
77 shrieks | |
n.尖叫声( shriek的名词复数 )v.尖叫( shriek的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
78 similes | |
(使用like或as等词语的)明喻( simile的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
79 maturity | |
n.成熟;完成;(支票、债券等)到期 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
80 condescended | |
屈尊,俯就( condescend的过去式和过去分词 ); 故意表示和蔼可亲 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
81 discord | |
n.不和,意见不合,争论,(音乐)不和谐 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
82 discredits | |
使不相信( discredit的第三人称单数 ); 使怀疑; 败坏…的名声; 拒绝相信 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
83 oracles | |
神示所( oracle的名词复数 ); 神谕; 圣贤; 哲人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
84 gainsaid | |
v.否认,反驳( gainsay的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
85 immolation | |
n.牺牲品 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
86 instigated | |
v.使(某事物)开始或发生,鼓动( instigate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
87 gratitude | |
adj.感激,感谢 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
88 reactionary | |
n.反动者,反动主义者;adj.反动的,反动主义的,反对改革的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
89 constrained | |
adj.束缚的,节制的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
90 noxious | |
adj.有害的,有毒的;使道德败坏的,讨厌的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
91 vilest | |
adj.卑鄙的( vile的最高级 );可耻的;极坏的;非常讨厌的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |