The Archbishop of Canterbury is making his second quadrennial visitation to his diocese, and delivering an elaborate Charge to the clergy1, in seven instalments. Of these the first two are reported at considerable length in the Times of the 27th and 28th inst., a couple of columns of small print being given to each. The Times has moreover generously vouchsafed2 a leading article of encouragement and approval on each; and surely the State Church ought to be proud of such lofty patronage3, and Lambeth Palace ought to be very grateful to Printing House Square. The Daily News could only spare half a column for the first; and the Daily Telegraph, whose exuberant4 Christianity, hot and strong as boiling rancid oil, amazes the world on every great festival of the Church, showed its estimate of the importance of our Primate5’s manifesto6 by allotting7 to it eight or nine lines of small print at the foot of a column—a pickpocket8 in a police-court gets as much notice.
Let us glance down the Times’ reports, pausing at anything worth a note if not by its intrinsic value yet on account of the position of the speaker:—
“I wish to set before you some thoughts as to the particular duties, which at this time devolve upon the Established Church as the National Church of this country. In the days in which we live some even hesitate to assign to us the position of a National Church. A National Church is a national protest for God and for Christ, for goodness and for truth; and if we of this National Church are not making this national protest, no one else certainly makes one. No other body in this country can claim that commanding influence over the thought of the age, which by God’s blessing9 is assigned to us. No other religious body in the country has either that connection with the State, or if that be thought a small matter, that power of influencing the whole nation which, thank God, is still reserved to us.”
It will be noticed that the Archbishop in his definition of a National Church has humbly10 copied the unorthodox Matthew Arnold, who in his address to London clergymen at Sion College, (reviewed in the Secularist11 of April 8) declared with an exquisitely12 humorous gravity that he regarded the Church of England as a great national society for the promotion13 of goodness! But the Archbishop is really too loose in his imitation of this charitable definition bestowed14 by a man of letters. He says: “A National Church is a national protest for God and for Christ;” according to which, Mohammedanism, Brahmanism, and Buddhism15, as the national churches of several countries, are so many national protests for God and Christ. We do not expect a mere16 Primate in these days to write with the precision of an accomplished17 literary man, but we do think that he ought to be somewhat less inaccurate18 than this. However, it is to the last two sentences quoted that I would particularly call attention. The Church of England has a commanding influence over the thought of the age! It has the power of influencing the whole nation! Here be truly astonishing announcements. The thought of the age in our country is embodied19 in such persons as Spencer and Darwin, Huxley and Tyndall, Carlyle and Browning, George Eliot and George Meredith; and what a commanding influence the State Church has over these! As for its influence over the whole nation, is it not the fact that a large portion of the educated classes, and the great bulk 01 the artisans, are either sceptical or indifferent, and that more than a half of the shopkeepers are Nonconformists bent20 on Disestablishment and Disendowment? The Archbishop has made a most unlucky start.
Passing over some commonplace and common-sense remarks on the duties of the clergy, we come to the following:—
“This is an age in which there is a great deal of uneasy thought seething21 throughout the nation. It is a time when, more than any other, serious and earnest learning is required to meet the wants of those among whom we live. Let us be thankful that the arrangements of cathedral bodies do provide quiet places where men may follow a studious course, and cause their light to be seen throughout the land, guiding the thought of those who are in need of guidance in this anxious age.”
Admitting the truth of the opening sentences we may add that in every age since the supremacy22 of the Church was first shaken by the invention of printing, the recovery of the Greek and Latin classics, and the revival23 of science, there has been a great deal of uneasy thought seething throughout this nation and every other nation in Christendom, and that age by age this seething has scalded more and more pitilessly the dogmas, the Scriptures24, and the authority of the Church, whose Hebrew old clothes, as Carlyle fitly calls them, must soon be literally25 boiled to rags. We may also freely admit that the arrangements of Cathedral bodies do provide quiet places where men may follow a studious course; but we ask, how many of them really pursue it? How many of them cause their light to shine throughout the land? How many guide the thought of those who need guidance in this anxious age? Is it not as notorious as it is disgraceful to the Church, that, with few exceptions, the canons and other dignitaries make scarcely any contribution to the thought, or scholarship, or science of the age, in return for the large leisure and ample stipends26 with which they are endowed? These stalled canons may ruminate27 much, even like stalled oxen, but what nourishment28 do we get from the rumination29 of the former? Look through lists of standard works, of really important works, published during the last quarter of a century, and see how few of them, even in theology and kindred departments, have come from the “learned leasure” of our rich cathedrals.
If there is one thing more closely connected than any other with true religion, that thing is money. Always the most spiritual exhortations30 and speculations31 end in very practical appeals to the pockets—of course the pockets of the laity33. We are reminded what Paul Louis Courier said of the clergy in his day: “They have need of good examples and will find them amongst us. But if we are stronger than they as to the commandments of God, they in their turn have the advantage of us in respect to the commandments of the Church, which they remember better than we, and of which the principal is, I believe, to give all we have for heaven. ‘You ask me,’ said that worthy34 preacher Barlette, ‘how to get to Paradise? The bells of the convent tell you: Giving, giving, giving,’ The Latin of the monk35 is charming: “Vos qu?ritis a me, fratres carissimi, quomodo itur ad paradisupi? Hoc dicunt vobis campance monasterii, dando, dando, dando” Very early in his discourse36 does our Primate ring this favorite chime of all church bells, but with a noble disinterestedness37, a magnanimous depreciation:—
“We may think lightly of the vast sums of money which of late years have been poured into the treasury38 of the Established Church for the re-edification of our buildings; we may think lightly even of the vast sums which have been contributed by the members of our Church for the instruction of our poorer brethren, thinking that, after all, it is not the silver and the gold, but the precious doctrine39 of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the purity and holiness which attend the true profession of that doctrine on which we have to rest our claims. But still even the outward signs of the influence which God has given us are not to be despised.”
“We may think lightly of the vast sums of money!” we, the archbishop with £15,000 a year and a palace rent-free, and the members of the Cathedral body of Canterbury each with our several hundreds a year and our snug40 residences! Very lightly, no doubt! But “still even the outward signs of the influence which God has given us are not to be despised.” How unworldly, how humble41, is our right reverend father in God; it is a pity that his voice here has such a twang of Pecksniff and Uriah Heap. I really believe that he is too much of a gentleman to speak in this tone with his natural voice; it is that fatal falsetto of the pulpit. Well, in sober truth, these Churchmen had better not despise the outward signs of their influence, for there is an abundant lack of inward ones. And discreetly42 do they boast of the re-edification of their buildings, for edification or re-edification of their congregations, alas43, there is little or none whereof to boast. Having rang this preliminary diffident chime of Dando dando, dando, the Archbishop revels44 in riotous45 peals32 to the same words before concluding:—
“Depend upon it a country that produces in a short time £30,000,000 [sic in Times; Daily News, ‘three millions’] to restore the outward fabric46 of our churches, will not fail to respond to any appeal when made for the funds which may be wanted to assist those who otherwise cannot provide themselves with a due education that they may be fitted for the ministry47. Another matter which I think presses upon us is this. Is it not desirable something should be done to provide the means of passing their last days in comfort, for those worn out in the service of Christ? Here again I feel confident that an appeal to the wealthy of this country would be answered at once if those who have the leisure—none more fit than the dignitaries of our cathedral churches—were to take up this question, and to our existing charities might well be added some means of supplementing the resources and meeting the wants of the poorer clergy. I visited yesterday the Clergy Orphan48 School. I was informed that that school was perfectly49 full—more full than it had ever been before—and still there were twice as many applicants50 for admission as there were places to admit them to. Does not this show it is very desirable we should all of us direct our efforts to see that the charity of our fellow-Churchmen should be appealed to, to assist in the education of the orphan children of our clergy, and not only the orphan children?”
Our fellow Christians51, the laymen52, having laid for us three million golden eggs in a short time (the lavish53 geese!) will not fail to give us more to educate young men for the ministry; and more yet to pension our worn-out clergy; and more yet again to educate the children, orphan and not orphan, of our clergy. We archbishop and bishops54, dean and chapter, are so poor, so poor, so very very poor, that we can do nothing at all for any of these miserable55 clerical critters; the whole revenues of our State Church are so insignificant56 that they are quite inadequate57 to provide decently for its ministers! But we know well that our dear, good, stupid, unedified lay brethren and sisters will give all the out-door relief we have the impudence58 to ask; will educate our young and pension our old; marching ever briskly heavenwards to that cheerfulest church chime: Giving, giving, giving; Dando, dando, dando! Does not our Archbishop rival or outrival that worthy preaching monk, Barlette? Here I must pause, but shall have to return again to the Charge, which threatens to be a heavy charge indeed to the purses of the richer and more foolish members of our impoverished59 State Church.
点击收听单词发音
1 clergy | |
n.[总称]牧师,神职人员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 vouchsafed | |
v.给予,赐予( vouchsafe的过去式和过去分词 );允诺 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 patronage | |
n.赞助,支援,援助;光顾,捧场 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 exuberant | |
adj.充满活力的;(植物)繁茂的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 primate | |
n.灵长类(目)动物,首席主教;adj.首要的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 manifesto | |
n.宣言,声明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 allotting | |
分配,拨给,摊派( allot的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 pickpocket | |
n.扒手;v.扒窃 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 blessing | |
n.祈神赐福;祷告;祝福,祝愿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 humbly | |
adv. 恭顺地,谦卑地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 secularist | |
n.现世主义者,世俗主义者;宗教与教育分离论者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 exquisitely | |
adv.精致地;强烈地;剧烈地;异常地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 promotion | |
n.提升,晋级;促销,宣传 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 bestowed | |
赠给,授予( bestow的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 Buddhism | |
n.佛教(教义) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 mere | |
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 accomplished | |
adj.有才艺的;有造诣的;达到了的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 inaccurate | |
adj.错误的,不正确的,不准确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 embodied | |
v.表现( embody的过去式和过去分词 );象征;包括;包含 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 bent | |
n.爱好,癖好;adj.弯的;决心的,一心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 seething | |
沸腾的,火热的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 supremacy | |
n.至上;至高权力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 revival | |
n.复兴,复苏,(精力、活力等的)重振 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 scriptures | |
经文,圣典( scripture的名词复数 ); 经典 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 literally | |
adv.照字面意义,逐字地;确实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 stipends | |
n.(尤指牧师的)薪俸( stipend的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 ruminate | |
v.反刍;沉思 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 nourishment | |
n.食物,营养品;营养情况 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 rumination | |
n.反刍,沉思 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 exhortations | |
n.敦促( exhortation的名词复数 );极力推荐;(正式的)演讲;(宗教仪式中的)劝诫 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 speculations | |
n.投机买卖( speculation的名词复数 );思考;投机活动;推断 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 peals | |
n.(声音大而持续或重复的)洪亮的响声( peal的名词复数 );隆隆声;洪亮的钟声;钟乐v.(使)(钟等)鸣响,(雷等)发出隆隆声( peal的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 laity | |
n.俗人;门外汉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 worthy | |
adj.(of)值得的,配得上的;有价值的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 monk | |
n.和尚,僧侣,修道士 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 discourse | |
n.论文,演说;谈话;话语;vi.讲述,著述 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 disinterestedness | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 treasury | |
n.宝库;国库,金库;文库 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 doctrine | |
n.教义;主义;学说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 snug | |
adj.温暖舒适的,合身的,安全的;v.使整洁干净,舒适地依靠,紧贴;n.(英)酒吧里的私房 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 humble | |
adj.谦卑的,恭顺的;地位低下的;v.降低,贬低 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 discreetly | |
ad.(言行)审慎地,慎重地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 alas | |
int.唉(表示悲伤、忧愁、恐惧等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 revels | |
n.作乐( revel的名词复数 );狂欢;着迷;陶醉v.作乐( revel的第三人称单数 );狂欢;着迷;陶醉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 riotous | |
adj.骚乱的;狂欢的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 fabric | |
n.织物,织品,布;构造,结构,组织 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 ministry | |
n.(政府的)部;牧师 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 orphan | |
n.孤儿;adj.无父母的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 perfectly | |
adv.完美地,无可非议地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 applicants | |
申请人,求职人( applicant的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 Christians | |
n.基督教徒( Christian的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 laymen | |
门外汉,外行人( layman的名词复数 ); 普通教徒(有别于神职人员) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 lavish | |
adj.无节制的;浪费的;vt.慷慨地给予,挥霍 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 bishops | |
(基督教某些教派管辖大教区的)主教( bishop的名词复数 ); (国际象棋的)象 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 miserable | |
adj.悲惨的,痛苦的;可怜的,糟糕的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 insignificant | |
adj.无关紧要的,可忽略的,无意义的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 inadequate | |
adj.(for,to)不充足的,不适当的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 impudence | |
n.厚颜无耻;冒失;无礼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 impoverished | |
adj.穷困的,无力的,用尽了的v.使(某人)贫穷( impoverish的过去式和过去分词 );使(某物)贫瘠或恶化 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |