And is that merely the spiritual deficiency of a Nibelung—or the effort of a young author to be smart? Would you like to hear that view of the most vital of Christian3 doctrines4 set forth5 in the language of scholarship and culture? Would you like to know how an ecclesiastical authority, equipped with every tool of modern learning, would set about voicing the idea that the function of the teaching of Heaven is to chloroform the poor, so that the rich may continue to rob them in security?
Here under my hand is a volume in the newest dress of scholarship, dated 1912, and written by Professor Georges Chatterton-Hill, of the University of Geneva. Its title is "The Sociological Value of Christianity", and from cover to cover it is a warning to the rich of the danger they run in giving up their religion and ceasing to support its priests. It explains how "the genius of Christianity has succeeded in making the individual suffering, the individual sacrifices, which are indispensible for the welfare of the collectivity, appear as indispensible for the individual welfare." The learned professor makes plain just what he means by "individual suffering, individual sacrifices"; he means all the horrors of capitalism6; and the advantage of Christianity is that it makes you think that by submitting to these horrors, you are profiting your own soul. "By making individual salvation7 depend on the acceptance of suffering, on the voluntary sacrifice of egotistical interests, Christianity adapts the individual to society". And this, as the professor explains, is not an easy thing to do, in a world in which so many people are thinking for themselves. "The only means of causing the rationalized individual to consent to the sacrifice...... is to captivate him with a sufficiently8 powerful idea!" And the professor shows how beautifully Jesus can be used for this purpose. "Jesus, the so-called humanitarian9, never ceased to insist on the necessity of suffering, the desirableness of suffering—of that suffering which a weak and sickly humanitarianism10 would fain suppress if it could."
You get this, you "blanket-stiff", you "husky", or "wop", or whatever you are—you disinherited of the earth, you proletarians who have only your labor-power to sell, you weak and sickly ones who are condemned11 to elimination12? There has come, let us say, a period of "overproduction"; you have raised too much food, and therefore you are starving, you have woven too much cloth, and therefore you are naked, you have finished the world for your masters, and it is time for you to move out of the way. As the sociologist13 from Geneva phrases it, "Your suppression imposes itself as an imperious necessity." And the function of the Christian religion is to make you enjoy the process, by "captivating you with a sufficiently powerful ideal"! The priest will fill your nostrils14 with incense15, your eyes with candle-lights and images, your ears with sweet music and soothing16 words; and so you will perish without raising a finger! "Here," reflects the professor, "we see how magnificently the teaching of Jesus applies to all classes of society!"
Somebody has evidently put up to our Christian sociologist the embarrassing fact that so many of those who survive under the capitalist system are godless scoundrels. But do you think that troubles him? Not for long. Like all religious thinkers, he carries with his scholar's equipment a pair of metaphysical wings, wherewith at any moment he may soar into the empyrean, out of reach of vulgar materialists, like you and me. "Inequality signifies inequality of capacity," he explains; but the standard whereby we judge this capacity "cannot be the standard of the moral law."
The laws which govern the biological evolution of man are known, but those which govern his moral nature cannot be known; the moral nature appertains to the Absolute, and hence is not subject to the law of inequality!
As an exhibition of metaphysical wing-power, that is almost as wonderful as the flight of Cardinal17 Newman when confronted with the fact that his divinely guided church had burned men for teaching the Copernican view of the universe; that infallible popes had again and again condemned this heresy18 ex cathedra. Said the eloquent19 cardinal:
Scripture20 says that the sun moves and the earth is stationary21, and science that the earth moves and the sun is comparatively at rest. How can we determine which of these opposite statements is the very truth till we know what motion is?
点击收听单词发音
1 bowels | |
n.肠,内脏,内部;肠( bowel的名词复数 );内部,最深处 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 immortality | |
n.不死,不朽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 Christian | |
adj.基督教徒的;n.基督教徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 doctrines | |
n.教条( doctrine的名词复数 );教义;学说;(政府政策的)正式声明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 forth | |
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 capitalism | |
n.资本主义 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 salvation | |
n.(尤指基督)救世,超度,拯救,解困 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 sufficiently | |
adv.足够地,充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 humanitarian | |
n.人道主义者,博爱者,基督凡人论者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 humanitarianism | |
n.博爱主义;人道主义;基督凡人论 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 condemned | |
adj. 被责难的, 被宣告有罪的 动词condemn的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 elimination | |
n.排除,消除,消灭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 sociologist | |
n.研究社会学的人,社会学家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 nostrils | |
鼻孔( nostril的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 incense | |
v.激怒;n.香,焚香时的烟,香气 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 soothing | |
adj.慰藉的;使人宽心的;镇静的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 cardinal | |
n.(天主教的)红衣主教;adj.首要的,基本的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 heresy | |
n.异端邪说;异教 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 eloquent | |
adj.雄辩的,口才流利的;明白显示出的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 scripture | |
n.经文,圣书,手稿;Scripture:(常用复数)《圣经》,《圣经》中的一段 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 stationary | |
adj.固定的,静止不动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |