[38]
Seemingly, no decision could have been wiser; seemingly, no child could have been brought up amid more favourable9 surroundings than their boy enjoyed in the splendid home they provided for him on a beautiful slope crested10 with pines. Yet, despite all the love lavished11 on him, despite the prodigious12 efforts to keep him well and strong, he did not thrive.
Before he was seven he displayed "nervous" symptoms that threw his parents into a panic. He suffered from "night terrors," he became excitable and irritable13. The eminent14 physician to whom he was taken made the flattering diagnosis15 that the only trouble with the boy was an unusually sensitive nervous organisation16; prescribed sedatives17, advised outdoor exercise, warned against overstudy, and so forth18. Unfortunately, he did not also emphasise19 the necessity for simplification of the child's environment as a preventive of nerve strain. Nor did he dwell on the supreme20 importance to physical, no less than moral, welfare of sedulously21 cultivating in the[39] little fellow the virtues22 of courage, self-control, and self-denial. Perhaps he did not think it needful to speak of these things to such evidently well-bred and well-intentioned parents; perhaps he did not think of these things at all.
In any event, while acting23 on his advice as to stimulating24 animal activity and retarding25 brain function, the father and mother continued to minister to their son's every whim26, and eternally busied themselves devising amusements and distractions27 for him. In time the "night terrors" were no longer in evidence; but the excitability and irritability28 persisted, and presently other unpleasant traits appeared, notably29 a tendency to conceit30 and selfishness. Naturally, this did not make the poor youngster any too popular among the few playmates with whom his parents allowed him to associate, and naturally the parents blamed the playmates for not appreciating the "sensitiveness" of his disposition31. Thus matters continued until his twelfth year, when his father suddenly awoke to the fact that, intellectually, the[40] naughty playmates were considerably32 ahead of the good little boy. For the first time common sense scored a distinct triumph over excessive and indiscreet parental33 love; the governess who had been unable to handle her self-willed pupil was dismissed, and the boy was sent to school.
There he has been painfully gaining the discipline—the lessons in self-mastery—that should have been given him in the nursery. But he still is lamentably34 arrogant36 and selfish; he still finds it difficult to get along with other boys. Whether his schoolmates will take the trouble to help him overcome the handicap of his early rearing is questionable37; and however this may be, it is hardly likely that the character defects unnecessarily acquired during his childhood will be wholly rooted out.
It must regretfully be added that this boy's case is not an exceptional one. Rather, it is typical of the plight38 of most "only children," who, no matter what their advantages of birth, too often reach manhood and womanhood sadly handicapped and markedly[41] inferior to other children. In a vague way, to be sure, parents with only one child have long realised that they are confronted with special problems in child training; but there is abundant proof that in innumerable instances they signally fail to grasp these problems clearly and work them out satisfactorily.
Everyday observation supports this statement, and it is confirmed by the findings of modern medical, psychological, and sociological investigation39. Statistically40, its most important corroboration41 is forthcoming from the results of a census42 of "only children," undertaken some years ago by the psychological department of Clark University in consequence of certain suggestive indications noticed in the responses received to a questionnaire on peculiar43 and exceptional children.
Of the thousand children described in these responses it was observed that forty-six were specifically mentioned as being "only children," although none of the queries44 in the questionnaire asked directly[42] or indirectly46 about such children. The presumption47 was that a number of the remaining children described in the responses were also of the only-child class. But even if such were not the case, the total of forty-six was surprisingly high, since, according to reliable vital statistics, the average progeny48 of fertile marriages is six, with an only-child average of one out of every thirteen fertile marriages; that is, a proportion of one only child to every seventy-eight children, as contrasted with the proportion of one in fewer than every twenty-two of the "peculiar" children described in the questionnaire reports.
Moreover, on dividing these reports into three groups based on the "advantageous," "neutral," and "disadvantageous" character of the peculiarities49 mentioned, it was found that while considerably less than half of the total number of children fell into the disadvantageous group, two-thirds of the "only children" had to be put into it. Naturally this suggested the desirability of a special investigation with reference to the only child, and accordingly[43] a second questionnaire was issued, with queries relating to age, sex, nationality, health, amusements, intellectual ability, moral traits, and so forth. In this way, from school teachers and other disinterested50 observers, definite information was obtained concerning nearly four hundred "only children"—information which, as finally tabulated51 and analysed by the director of the investigation, Doctor E. W. Bohannon, is of great significance to the parents of every only child and to all interested in individual and racial improvement.
The age average of those whose ages were given—nearly three hundred—was twelve years, including about sixty ranging in age from seventeen to thirty-five. About four-fifths were of American parentage, while the proportion with regard to sex was, roughly speaking, one-third male and two-thirds female, a disparity doubtless attributable in part to the circumstances of the investigation. About one hundred were said not to be in good health, and another hundred to be in outright52 bad health. In one hundred[44] and thirty-three out of two hundred and fifty-eight cases the temperament53 was described as "nervous." Precocity54 was another often-mentioned trait; but on the average the beginning of school life was from a year and a half to two years later than is usual, and in the performance of school work the questionnaire responses also revealed a marked inferiority on the part of many "only children."
In their social relations only eighty were reported as "normal," while one hundred and thirty-four out of a total of two hundred and sixty-nine got along badly with other children, usually because they were unwilling55 or did not know how to make concessions56, or were stubbornly set on having their own way. On this important point Doctor Bohannon says, in detail:
"When they disagree with other children it is usually because of a desire to rule. If they fail in this desire they are likely to refuse to associate with the children who cause the failure, and in a measure succeed in the wish to have their own way, either[45] by choosing younger companions whom they can control, or older ones who are willing to indulge them. Many do not care for a large number of companions, and select one or two for friends, with whom they prefer to spend most of their time.... In numerous instances ... a marked preference for the company of older people is manifest, even when opportunity for younger company is present. But this is no doubt due less to a dislike of suitable companionship than to their inability to understand and be understood by children of near their own age. It is plainly evident that they have as deep longings57 for society as the children of other families, but their isolated58 home life has failed to give them equal skill and ability in social matters. They do not so well understand how to make approaches, to concede this thing and that."
Of two hundred and forty-five in attendance at school, more than one hundred "only children" were recorded as not being normally interested in active games, sixty-two of these scarcely playing at[46] all. "If left to their own devices," Doctor Bohannon infers from the reports which he received concerning the inactive sixty-two, "they are pretty sure to be found in the schoolroom with their teachers at intermission. A number of the boys prefer to play with the girls at strictly59 girls' games, such as keeping house with dolls, and generally come to be called girl-boys."
Effeminacy, in fact, is an unpleasantly frequent characteristic of the male only child, and was noted60 in case after case described in the replies to the questionnaire. Selfishness was set down as the dominant61 trait in ninety-four "only children" of both sexes, and many others were described as being unusually bad-tempered62, vain, naughty, or untruthful.[3]
These depressing findings have since been confirmed by other investigators63, some of whom have contributed specially64 to our knowledge of the state[47] of the only child in adult life. For instance, the well-known English psychologist, Havelock Ellis, studying the life histories of four hundred eminent men and women, found the low percentage of 6.9 for "only children," indicating unmistakably the persistence65 of the intellectual inferiority brought out by the answers to the Bohannon questionnaire. There would also seem to be no doubt that egotism and social inadaptability characterise, the adult only child no less than the immature67 one.
"In later life," affirms the American psychopathologist, A. A. Brill, who has made a special study of the only child from both a medical and psychological point of view, "he is extremely conceited68, jealous, and envious69. He begrudges70 the happiness of friends and acquaintances, and he is therefore shunned71 and disliked." Besides which, speaking from wide experience as a practising specialist in New York City, Doctor Brill insists that the only child, at any age of life, is peculiarly liable to fall a victim to hysteria, neurasthenia, and other serious functional72 nervous[48] and mental maladies; and his belief, as I happen to know from their personal statements to me, is shared by other observant neurologists and psychopathologists, such as Doctors James J. Putnam and I. H. Coriat, of Boston.
This is a point of special interest, for the reason that recent medical research has made it certain that the maladies in question are one and all rooted in faulty habits of thought, usually resultant from errors of training in childhood. Chief among these errors, according to all modern neurologists, is an upbringing which tends to develop excessive occupation with thoughts of self. But this is precisely73 the kind of upbringing given the majority of "only children." Here again the Bohannon investigation affords impressive evidence. One of the queries included in the questionnaire bore on the treatment accorded the only child when at home, and it is indeed significant that in about 75 per cent. of the replies received it was stated that the policy of the parents was one of extreme indulgence.
[49]
"Had her own way in everything," "Her parents gratify her every whim," "She is surrounded by adults who indulge her too much," "Humoured," "Petted," "Coddled," are some of the expressions frequently employed to describe the parental treatment. Many of the answers sent to Doctor Bohannon also testify to an over-anxiety with respect to the child's welfare that might easily give rise to undue74 feelings of self-importance or to an unhealthy habit of introspection. "His mother was always unduly75 anxious about him when he was out of her sight," "She is thought to be quite delicate, and great care is taken of her; she is kept in a warm room and seldom allowed to go out," "His home treatment has made a baby of him," may fairly be cited as typical statements returned by Doctor Bohannon's respondents.
Is it any wonder that the average only child grows up deficient76 in initiative and self-reliance? Is it any wonder that, under the stress of some sudden shock, he reacts badly, allowing himself to be overwhelmed[50] by it, even to the extent of perhaps becoming a neurasthenic wreck77? In short, can it be doubted that the handicap under which he too often has to struggle painfully through life is not a handicap imposed by Nature but is solely78 of his parents' making?
Sometimes this is all too clearly appreciated in later life by the child himself, and the parental error is bitterly resented; or, if the sense of filial piety79 be sufficiently80 strong, is splendidly excused. As in this fragment from an autobiographical statement by an only child:
"Of the selfishness of which a frank woman accused me, my parents were, up to that time, quite as unconscious as I. She had asked my mother to drive with her to the home of a friend in a neighbouring town, where the two were invited to spend the night. My mother declined, on the ground that I, at that time about nine, could not comb my hair and pin my collar properly for school in the morning; and as we then had no maid and my father could at best[51] only have buttoned my frock, the objection seemed insurmountable. But the family friend called me by the ugly title of naughty, selfish little girl, and chided mother for allowing me to monopolise her time, contending that she was making me selfish and dependent.
"Perhaps she was. But I protest that it could hardly have been otherwise, considering that she had in full measure the world-old desire of mothers to spend themselves for their children, and only one child to spend herself on. It had not occurred to my mother, I am confident, that her habit of ministering to me constantly was pampering81; nor had I, in going to her for services that I might easily have learned to perform for myself, made demands in the manner of the arrogant spoiled child."[4]
The compelling power of mother-love and father-love must, of a truth, be recognised in extenuation82 of the spoiling of the only child. But the fact of the spoiling remains83, and the fact also that when the[52] spoiling is achieved the parental pride and joy will be turned to grief and bitter lamentation84. The pity of it is that the only child, simply because he is the only child, ought to be able to grow up healthier, wiser, and more efficient than other children.
For, as psychologists are insisting more and more emphatically, the health, happiness, and efficiency of adult life depend preponderantly on the home influences of early childhood; and, obviously, in a home where the parental attention can be concentrated on a single child, better results should be attained85 than when the work of training involves a division of the attention among several children. Unhappily, when it is a question of training an only child, too many parents seem to take it for granted that training is entirely86 unnecessary, that their child is innately87 so good that he will develop of his own accord into one of the best of men.
In reality, as modern psychology88 has made very clear, every child at the outset of his life is much like every other child, a plastic, unmoral little creature,[53] exceedingly impulsive89 and exceedingly receptive, readily impressed for good or evil by the influences that surround him. Childhood, to repeat a truism hackneyed to psychologists, but seemingly unappreciated by most people, is pre-eminently the suggestible period of life. It is then, when the critical faculty90 still is undeveloped, that whatever ideas are presented to the mind are most surely absorbed by it, to sink into its subconscious91 depths, and there form the nucleus92 for whole systems of thought afterward93 manifesting as habits. Herein lurks94 the special peril95 to the only child afflicted96 with over-loving, over-anxious parents.
Their perpetual solicitude97 for him, acting as a suggestion of irresistible98 force, tends to engender99 in him a mental attitude out of which may afterward spring, according to the subsequent circumstances of his life, a cold, heartless, calculating selfishness, or a morbid100 self-anxiety, perhaps eventuating in all sorts of neurotic101 symptoms. If, as a boy, he is too closely and constantly associated with his mother,[54] the force of suggestion again, acting largely through the imitative instinct, may lead to a development of those feminine traits frequently characteristic of male only children, and often involving pathological conditions of dire45 social as well as individual significance. Further still, by restricting unduly the intercourse102 of only children with playmates of their own age, as is often done, one of the finest agencies in development through the power of suggestion is left unutilised. There is a world of truth in the lament35 of the only child from whose autobiography103 I have already quoted:
"All this carefulness kept me uncontaminated by the naughtiness of little street Arabs, but it also limited my opportunity to imitate where imitation is easiest—among those of my own age; it stunted104 the initiativeness and inventiveness that might, in normal conditions, have developed in me; and it left me lacking in adaptability66. I sometimes disloyally wonder if my chances of being a tolerable citizen might not have been as good if I had been permitted to[55] 'run wild,' and thus secure for myself the companionship I could not have at home."
Of course, association with other children means at least an occasional hard knock, and hard knocks are, above all else, what the doting105 mother wishes to avoid for her darling boy. She forgets that they are certain to be experienced, soon or late, and that the earlier her boy is fitted to withstand them the better they will be withstood. She forgets, too, that if the suggestions emanating106 from playmates are not invariably suggestions for good, they may easily be counteracted107, without sacrificing the advantages to be gained from association with playmates, by proper training in the quiet of the home.
Always, let me repeat, it is the home training that counts for most. If the only child turns out well, the credit must go to the parents; if, alas108! he turns out badly, if he becomes a monster of selfishness or a neurotic weakling, the blame must likewise be theirs.
And now it becomes necessary to add that, if in less degree, the "favourite child" in a family is exposed[56] to dangers similar to those menacing the unwisely brought up "only child." That parent of several children is making a sad mistake if he singles out any one of his children for special affection and solicitude. The consequences of such favouritism are twofold, affecting adversely109, perhaps disastrously110, both the child unduly favoured and the child or children comparatively slighted. So far as the former is concerned, the outcome, when the favouritism involves really excessive love and anxiety, is pretty sure to be much like that in the case of the average only child. That is to say, there is always more than a possibility that the favourite child, no matter how good his inherited qualities, will grow up arrogant, self-centred, and neurotic.
He is usually in less danger than the only child of growing up deficient in initiative and social adaptability. For, unless his parents constantly interfere111 in his behalf, daily intercourse with his brothers and sisters is bound to impress on him at an early age the necessity for developing self-reliance[57] and for making concessions to the rights and susceptibilities of others. On the other hand, because he is the favourite child and because his brothers and sisters instinctively112 resent this, his intercourse with them is likely to be attended with more than the usual amount of friction113. Thereby114 an additional stress will be put on a nervous system already more or less strained by the fussing and fretting115 of indulgent, unthinking parents. During childhood, it is true, he may not give marked evidence of neural116 enfeeblement. But, soon or late, if a kindly117 fortune does not rescue him at an early age from the harmful home environment—as, for example, by his removal to a good boarding-school—one may count on his displaying striking eccentricities118 of character and conduct, if not positively119 pathological conditions.
Consequently, his whole prospects120 for adult life will be adversely affected121. The selfishness fostered by his father's, or mother's, excessive devotion may become intensified122 rather than lessened123 by friction with envious brothers and sisters, with the result[58] that the favourite child passes into manhood abnormally deficient in altruistic124 qualities, and even abnormally misanthropic125. "A favourite son, a bachelor of sixty-two years, who was a wealthy retired126 merchant," notes the psychopathologist Brill, "told me that whenever there was a rise in the market he suffered from severe depression and fits of envy, simply because he knew that some of his friends would make money. He himself had no interest in the market." And, speaking as an observer who has closely studied the subject, Doctor Brill unhesitatingly adds that, like so many "only children," almost all favourite children are in later years "selfish, unhappy, and morose127."
It is true there are notable exceptions. Some favourite children are brought up so well that, aside perhaps from a tendency to nervous ailments128, they display no peculiarities and pass through life creditably, possibly brilliantly. But such exceptions are conspicuous129 by their rarity, for the excellent reason that parents who are wise enough to rear favourite[59] children well are commonly wise enough not to show favouritism to any of their children.
For, no matter, how much the favourite child may benefit from the extra care bestowed130 on him, the mere131 fact that he is thus selected for special attention is sure to work to the detriment132 of the other children in the family. When, as often happens, there is only one other child, the effect on that child may be catastrophic. When the favourite child has several brothers and sisters there is less danger that any of these will be really disastrously affected. At best, however, they will chafe133 under the injustice134 of the favouritism shown by the parent or parents; and, besides instinctively drawing together for mutual135 consolation136 and defence, they may develop a spirit of rebellion destructive to the peace and well-being137 of the entire family.
点击收听单词发音
1 dread | |
vt.担忧,忧虑;惧怕,不敢;n.担忧,畏惧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 fervently | |
adv.热烈地,热情地,强烈地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 undone | |
a.未做完的,未完成的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 residential | |
adj.提供住宿的;居住的;住宅的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 abounded | |
v.大量存在,充满,富于( abound的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 adverse | |
adj.不利的;有害的;敌对的,不友好的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 utterly | |
adv.完全地,绝对地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 favourable | |
adj.赞成的,称赞的,有利的,良好的,顺利的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 crested | |
adj.有顶饰的,有纹章的,有冠毛的v.到达山顶(或浪峰)( crest的过去式和过去分词 );到达洪峰,达到顶点 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 lavished | |
v.过分给予,滥施( lavish的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 prodigious | |
adj.惊人的,奇妙的;异常的;巨大的;庞大的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 irritable | |
adj.急躁的;过敏的;易怒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 eminent | |
adj.显赫的,杰出的,有名的,优良的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 diagnosis | |
n.诊断,诊断结果,调查分析,判断 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 organisation | |
n.组织,安排,团体,有机休 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 sedatives | |
n.镇静药,镇静剂( sedative的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 forth | |
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 emphasise | |
vt.加强...的语气,强调,着重 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 sedulously | |
ad.孜孜不倦地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 virtues | |
美德( virtue的名词复数 ); 德行; 优点; 长处 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 acting | |
n.演戏,行为,假装;adj.代理的,临时的,演出用的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 stimulating | |
adj.有启发性的,能激发人思考的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 retarding | |
使减速( retard的现在分词 ); 妨碍; 阻止; 推迟 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 whim | |
n.一时的兴致,突然的念头;奇想,幻想 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 distractions | |
n.使人分心的事[人]( distraction的名词复数 );娱乐,消遣;心烦意乱;精神错乱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 irritability | |
n.易怒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 notably | |
adv.值得注意地,显著地,尤其地,特别地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 conceit | |
n.自负,自高自大 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 disposition | |
n.性情,性格;意向,倾向;排列,部署 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 considerably | |
adv.极大地;相当大地;在很大程度上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 parental | |
adj.父母的;父的;母的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 lamentably | |
adv.哀伤地,拙劣地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 lament | |
n.悲叹,悔恨,恸哭;v.哀悼,悔恨,悲叹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 arrogant | |
adj.傲慢的,自大的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 questionable | |
adj.可疑的,有问题的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 plight | |
n.困境,境况,誓约,艰难;vt.宣誓,保证,约定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 investigation | |
n.调查,调查研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 statistically | |
ad.根据统计数据来看,从统计学的观点来看 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 corroboration | |
n.进一步的证实,进一步的证据 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 census | |
n.(官方的)人口调查,人口普查 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 peculiar | |
adj.古怪的,异常的;特殊的,特有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 queries | |
n.问题( query的名词复数 );疑问;询问;问号v.质疑,对…表示疑问( query的第三人称单数 );询问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 dire | |
adj.可怕的,悲惨的,阴惨的,极端的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 indirectly | |
adv.间接地,不直接了当地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 presumption | |
n.推测,可能性,冒昧,放肆,[法律]推定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 progeny | |
n.后代,子孙;结果 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 peculiarities | |
n. 特质, 特性, 怪癖, 古怪 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 disinterested | |
adj.不关心的,不感兴趣的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 tabulated | |
把(数字、事实)列成表( tabulate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 outright | |
adv.坦率地;彻底地;立即;adj.无疑的;彻底的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 temperament | |
n.气质,性格,性情 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 precocity | |
n.早熟,早成 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 unwilling | |
adj.不情愿的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 concessions | |
n.(尤指由政府或雇主给予的)特许权( concession的名词复数 );承认;减价;(在某地的)特许经营权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 longings | |
渴望,盼望( longing的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 isolated | |
adj.与世隔绝的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 strictly | |
adv.严厉地,严格地;严密地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60 noted | |
adj.著名的,知名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61 dominant | |
adj.支配的,统治的;占优势的;显性的;n.主因,要素,主要的人(或物);显性基因 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62 bad-tempered | |
adj.脾气坏的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63 investigators | |
n.调查者,审查者( investigator的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64 specially | |
adv.特定地;特殊地;明确地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65 persistence | |
n.坚持,持续,存留 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
66 adaptability | |
n.适应性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
67 immature | |
adj.未成熟的,发育未全的,未充分发展的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
68 conceited | |
adj.自负的,骄傲自满的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
69 envious | |
adj.嫉妒的,羡慕的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
70 begrudges | |
嫉妒( begrudge的第三人称单数 ); 勉强做; 不乐意地付出; 吝惜 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
71 shunned | |
v.避开,回避,避免( shun的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
72 functional | |
adj.为实用而设计的,具备功能的,起作用的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
73 precisely | |
adv.恰好,正好,精确地,细致地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
74 undue | |
adj.过分的;不适当的;未到期的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
75 unduly | |
adv.过度地,不适当地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
76 deficient | |
adj.不足的,不充份的,有缺陷的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
77 wreck | |
n.失事,遇难;沉船;vt.(船等)失事,遇难 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
78 solely | |
adv.仅仅,唯一地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
79 piety | |
n.虔诚,虔敬 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
80 sufficiently | |
adv.足够地,充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
81 pampering | |
v.纵容,宠,娇养( pamper的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
82 extenuation | |
n.减轻罪孽的借口;酌情减轻;细 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
83 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
84 lamentation | |
n.悲叹,哀悼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
85 attained | |
(通常经过努力)实现( attain的过去式和过去分词 ); 达到; 获得; 达到(某年龄、水平、状况) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
86 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
87 innately | |
adv.天赋地;内在地,固有地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
88 psychology | |
n.心理,心理学,心理状态 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
89 impulsive | |
adj.冲动的,刺激的;有推动力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
90 faculty | |
n.才能;学院,系;(学院或系的)全体教学人员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
91 subconscious | |
n./adj.潜意识(的),下意识(的) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
92 nucleus | |
n.核,核心,原子核 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
93 afterward | |
adv.后来;以后 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
94 lurks | |
n.潜在,潜伏;(lurk的复数形式)vi.潜伏,埋伏(lurk的第三人称单数形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
95 peril | |
n.(严重的)危险;危险的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
96 afflicted | |
使受痛苦,折磨( afflict的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
97 solicitude | |
n.焦虑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
98 irresistible | |
adj.非常诱人的,无法拒绝的,无法抗拒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
99 engender | |
v.产生,引起 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
100 morbid | |
adj.病的;致病的;病态的;可怕的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
101 neurotic | |
adj.神经病的,神经过敏的;n.神经过敏者,神经病患者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
102 intercourse | |
n.性交;交流,交往,交际 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
103 autobiography | |
n.自传 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
104 stunted | |
adj.矮小的;发育迟缓的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
105 doting | |
adj.溺爱的,宠爱的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
106 emanating | |
v.从…处传出,传出( emanate的现在分词 );产生,表现,显示 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
107 counteracted | |
对抗,抵消( counteract的过去式 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
108 alas | |
int.唉(表示悲伤、忧愁、恐惧等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
109 adversely | |
ad.有害地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
110 disastrously | |
ad.灾难性地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
111 interfere | |
v.(in)干涉,干预;(with)妨碍,打扰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
112 instinctively | |
adv.本能地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
113 friction | |
n.摩擦,摩擦力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
114 thereby | |
adv.因此,从而 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
115 fretting | |
n. 微振磨损 adj. 烦躁的, 焦虑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
116 neural | |
adj.神经的,神经系统的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
117 kindly | |
adj.和蔼的,温和的,爽快的;adv.温和地,亲切地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
118 eccentricities | |
n.古怪行为( eccentricity的名词复数 );反常;怪癖 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
119 positively | |
adv.明确地,断然,坚决地;实在,确实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
120 prospects | |
n.希望,前途(恒为复数) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
121 affected | |
adj.不自然的,假装的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
122 intensified | |
v.(使)增强, (使)加剧( intensify的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
123 lessened | |
减少的,减弱的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
124 altruistic | |
adj.无私的,为他人着想的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
125 misanthropic | |
adj.厌恶人类的,憎恶(或蔑视)世人的;愤世嫉俗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
126 retired | |
adj.隐退的,退休的,退役的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
127 morose | |
adj.脾气坏的,不高兴的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
128 ailments | |
疾病(尤指慢性病),不适( ailment的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
129 conspicuous | |
adj.明眼的,惹人注目的;炫耀的,摆阔气的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
130 bestowed | |
赠给,授予( bestow的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
131 mere | |
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
132 detriment | |
n.损害;损害物,造成损害的根源 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
133 chafe | |
v.擦伤;冲洗;惹怒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
134 injustice | |
n.非正义,不公正,不公平,侵犯(别人的)权利 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
135 mutual | |
adj.相互的,彼此的;共同的,共有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
136 consolation | |
n.安慰,慰问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
137 well-being | |
n.安康,安乐,幸福 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |