Dorothea Beale in age remembered that in youth she had planned ‘an air-castle school, with a central quadrangle, cloisters1 and rooms over.’
To few is it given, as it was given to her, to realise so nearly the dreams of youth, for few possess the sense of purpose and the indomitable will which fell to her portion. But the college of her vision did not come into being without a process of development so slow that for some years progress could hardly be recorded, nor without infinite disappointment even in matters which seemed at the time vital; not without ceaseless effort, seen and unseen, on the part of the Lady Principal.
We have reached, in the twentieth century, a period in the history of education in which schools may be said to be founded ready-made. A great and fine ‘plant,’ opening ceremonies, royal patronage2, appear necessities from the beginning. The Ladies’ College, Cheltenham, was twenty years old before it had a building of its own, its first stone was laid by an unknown hand, its opening rite3 consisted of school prayers in the ordinary way on a Monday morning, at 9 a.m., with the addition of a few words rather nervously4 read by the Lady Principal. The college has never had a patron, nor did it even have any specially5 distinguished6 visitor, till the Empress Frederick came in 1897.
[82]
The Ladies’ College did not originate with Miss Beale. She brought to it, when it was but a weakling and like to perish, all her dreams and all her energies. She made it emphatically her own; but its first inception7 was with a small number of Cheltenham residents, notably8 with the Reverend H. Walford Bellairs, then H.M. Inspector10 of Schools for Gloucestershire,[30] and the Reverend C. A. Bromby,[31] Principal of the Training Colleges. Its foundation was a continuation of work already begun in the town with the opening of Cheltenham College, in 1843. This was one of the earliest of the great nineteenth century public schools, and one of the very few which has no ancient origin. A very slight glance at the history of the town, which has produced two great colleges, will serve to show that their work in its midst has been almost that of a quiet and beneficent revolution.
The mild air and fertile soil of the great plain below the Cotswold Hills were recognised as early as the days of Edward the Confessor, when Cheltenham was called upon to furnish a large amount of bread for the royal kennels11. For centuries only a little market town with a beautiful Early Gothic church on the banks of an insignificant12 stream, it crept out of obscurity in the pages of Ogilby who, in 1785, described it as inhabited by people ‘much given to plant tobacco, though they are suppressed by authority.’
Forty years after this the discovery of the medicinal properties of its waters made the place attractive to those who could afford to take the remedy, and in the later years of George the Third, it came to be the ‘Queen of watering places.’ Details of the long royal visit of 1788[83] may be read in the pages of Fanny Burney and others. The King would afterwards speak of Cheltenham and the Vale of Gloucester as ‘the finest part of my kingdom that I have beheld13.’ Other distinguished visitors followed: the Prince Regent, who gave a ball; Charles James Fox; Wellington, within a year of Waterloo; Louis Philippe and Marie Amélie in their exile; and many others, among whom, as a boy, came Byron, to wander, according to a continental14 biographer, ‘on the seashore at Cheltenham!’
As late as 1870 there was in Cheltenham scarcely a house which did not testify by its grandiose15, pseudo-classic[32] architecture to the past magnificence of a town which had striven to be worthy16 of a court. Even to-day there are but few which do not follow the lines laid down by the builders of the early years of the nineteenth century, a time at which the town grew with mushroom speed. It was a period when population was rapidly increasing all over the country; but in few places were the leaps and bounds so marked as in Cheltenham, where in 1840, a census17 return was tenfold larger than it had been in 1804.
This rapid growth was due, less to the famous wells and pump-rooms than to the reputation of its climate, and the absence of any great winter severity, attractive to those who had lived in tropical countries. Hence Cheltenham became a favourite residence for Anglo-Indians, military and civil. The town grew perhaps a little less distinguished, but not less gay and popular. The fashion in Cheltenham waters passed; kings and dukes sought their ‘cure’ abroad; but it was possible to have balls and other amusements without a Prince Regent, while the[84] hunting season especially became a time of festivity. And side by side with the lovers of pleasure, who formed so large and sparkling a part of Cheltenham society, existed those who took all life with deep, almost forbidding seriousness.
To meet the needs of the rapidly growing population during the first forty years of the nineteenth century, several churches were built under the auspices18 of different persons. Church-building in the days of proprietary19 sittings was a not unprofitable investment; there were also liberal benefactors20 to support Mr. Close, who was incumbent21 of Cheltenham for nearly thirty years, in his schemes for the welfare of his flock.
Francis Close, a disciple22 of Charles Simeon, came to Cheltenham in 1824, as curate-in-charge of Holy Trinity, a newly erected23 chapel-of-ease to the parish church. The living of Cheltenham was already at that time in the hands of Simeon, who had purchased it from its various patrons, and presented it to the Reverend C. Jervis. On the death of Mr. Jervis, Simeon appointed young Close to this important charge. From the first Mr. Close was a very popular preacher. ‘It was,’ says an admirer, ‘a new and interesting sight to see so singularly handsome a young man filled with such religious zeal24.’ A man of pronounced and narrow views, immense activity and determination, combined with geniality25 and cheerfulness, he sought to regulate the ways of society, and to some extent succeeded. He ruled the town from the pulpit of the parish church as from a throne, and earned, among those who loved him least, the name of the ‘Pope of Cheltenham.’[33] He preached against racing,[85] acting26, dancing. But if, as has been said, he established dinner-parties and destroyed the theatre, he acted only with others of his school of thought. Those were the days of eating and drinking, since some form of recreation was necessary, and, moreover, abstinence had a suspiciously Roman look. They were days when all forms of art, not that of the theatre alone, were regarded with distrust. It is true that Mr. Close gave a lecture on ‘Literature and the Fine Arts considered as Legitimate27 Pursuits of a Religious Man’; he also preached a sermon entitled ‘The Restoration of Churches is the Restoration of Popery,’ and he said to the head-mistress of a fashionable boarding-school where dancing was included in the curriculum: ‘When Mrs. Close wished my daughters taught dancing, I reminded her of her marriage vow28.’
Mr. Close’s energies took visible and permanent shape in the buildings which arose during his long incumbency29. Eight churches grew up around the parish church, but that, alas30! was not their model. Most of the new ones displayed all the worst features of a debased style of church architecture: a diminutive31 chancel, three-decker arrangements for parson and clerk, high pews, with safe doors for the congregation.
National schools were built, and training colleges founded, also under the direction of Mr. Close, and he took his share in the institution of the Proprietary College for Boys, in 1843.
With the new churches came new clergy32, among whom, the most popular name at the time, was that of Archibald Boyd, vicar of Christchurch, a very eloquent33 preacher who brought the little schoolroom in the hamlet of Alstone, where he lectured on Sunday evenings, into rivalry34 with the parish church. To-day, he is famous[86] for having had as his curate, for five years, the young Frederick Robertson, whose afternoon sermons at Christchurch, in spite of the suspicion of unorthodoxy which early began to attach itself to his name, drew many thoughtful hearers, such as the Principal of Cheltenham College.
The most leading mind at the time among the younger clergy was that of Charles Henry Bromby, who became vicar of St. Paul’s in 1843. He was a man of large mental gifts, and had special perception of the intellectual needs of his day. The Working Men’s Club, which he established in his parish, was among the very first in the country. All the great educational institutions of Cheltenham are indebted to his outlook and zeal. Joint-founder of Cheltenham College, and later, though he took no public part and earned no name in the matter, of that for ‘Young Ladies and Children,’ his most active interest and work was for the teaching of the poor. He became first Principal of the Training Colleges[34] for headmasters and mistresses of national schools, starting the work on wise and secure lines, and rapidly bringing it to the front among that of kindred institutions.
Mr. Bellairs was actively35 as well as zealously36 associated with Mr. Bromby in all the great schemes, by which Cheltenham, rich and poor, was to be enlightened, and in the case of the Proprietary College for Ladies, it is his name which comes to the front, and it was in his house that the first meeting to draw up its constitution was held.
There was every reason to hope that a high-class day-school for girls, then almost unknown, might succeed in Cheltenham, where parents had had a successful experience[87] of such a school for their boys. Everywhere, people, who cared about a good education for girls, found it difficult to obtain even at great cost. Many liked to keep their children with them; those who were indifferent would be glad to avail themselves of the cheaper method of the day-school, provided it could be run on exclusive lines. There had been for some years in the town, select boarding schools, where a few day-scholars were received. The advantage over these of a large public school, necessarily of a more permanent character than a small private institution could be, was obvious.
At the meeting in the house of Mr. Bellairs, on September 30, 1853, a date which Miss Beale has noted37 as the birthday of the Ladies’ College, there were present but three others. These were the Reverend W. Dobson, Principal of Cheltenham College, the Reverend H. A. Holden, Vice-Principal, and Dr. S. E. Comyn. One other gentleman should be named among these early builders, namely, Mr. Nathaniel Hartland. Colonel Fitzmaurice was also a member of the first council.
The founders38 of this college and day-school for girls were anxious to make it clear that their aim was to develop in the pupils character and fitness for the duties of later life. Hence the first report states that it was intended ‘to afford, on reasonable terms, an education based upon religious principles which, preserving the modesty39 and gentleness of the female character, should so far cultivate [a girl’s] intellectual powers as to fit her for the discharge of those responsible duties which devolve upon her as a wife, mother, mistress and friend, the natural companion and helpmeet for man.’ In framing the constitutions Mr. Bellairs and his colleagues had before their minds the successful College for Boys, and[88] adopted its rules with regard to religious instruction, and the social rank of the pupils.
The draft of the resolutions, made at the first meeting, may still be read. Hardly less remarkable40 than the development of later days is the permanent nature of the impress given to the College at its first start. Some of the resolutions were:—
‘That an Institution for the daughters and young children of Noblemen and Gentlemen be established in Cheltenham, and be entitled the Cheltenham College for the education of young Ladies and Children.
‘The College to be established by means of one hundred shares of £10 each; the possessor of each share to have the power of nominating a Pupil, and a vote at annual and special meetings.
...
‘That the management of the College for the ensuing year shall be vested in the Founders, viz.... who for this purpose shall be constituted the Committee of Management after the expiration41 of the first year, exclusive of the Treasurer42 and Honorary Secretary, who will be ex officio members of the Board, they being shareholders43 and members of the Church of England....
‘That the College be under the direction of a Principal, a Lady from whom the pupils will receive religious instruction at appointed times in accordance with the doctrine44 and the teaching of the Church of England....
‘That at the end of each year the pupils be examined by competent persons appointed by the Committee.
‘That the College shall consist of two departments, the Junior for children of both sexes, admissible after five years of age, the boys to be removed when they have attained45 their eighth year.
‘The appointment of the Lady Principal and all subordinate teachers and officers to be vested in the Committee.’
With few alterations46 these resolutions passed into the prospectus47 issued to the public in November 1853, an exact copy of which will be found in the appendix.[35] Experimental prospectuses49, which never left the hands of[89] the Committee, exist to show how the founders formed and modified their views for the College. It was proposed at one time to have a noble patron and a visitor, besides the working Committee; but as Miss Beale somewhat whimsically relates, this was found to be impracticable. ‘It was thought that it would add to the prestige of the College, and diminish the prejudice which then existed, to have a distinguished patron, and so Lord de Saumerez, then resident in Cheltenham, was applied50 to, but in vain. So there was no Patron.’[36] There was also no visitor until 1875, when Dr. Ellicott, then Bishop51 of Gloucester, kindly52 undertook the charge. The difficulty of securing patronage was probably what caused the Council, in virtue53 of one of their own rules, to invite Mr. Close to accept the office of President, with a seat at the Board. At the same time Mr. Bellairs was appointed Vice-President.
In the first instance it was intended that the College should be confined to day-scholars; then, in case this restriction54 should limit the scope of the work and perhaps injure it financially, a sort of half-measure was planned, and it was proposed to state that: ‘the Committee will not interfere55 with any arrangements made by the Parents and Friends of pupils for Boarding their Children, provided the numbers in any given Boarding-House do not exceed six. Should Boarding-Houses ever be opened offering accommodation to a greater number of pupils than six, the Committee reserve to themselves the power of insisting upon and conferring a License56, before Children in such Boarding-Houses be allowed the privilege of becoming Students in the College.’
As early as the 1st of November three ladies had been found to undertake boarding-houses, and they were not[90] restricted as to numbers. The low terms of the boarding-houses (£40 a year including all expenses, of course without the tuition fees) suggest that the ideas of the liberal-minded Committee may have forestalled57 those of the future Lady Principal, ever eager to help on those who deserved but could not afford education. The tuition fees were on the same low scale; from six guineas to twenty guineas, and including pianoforte lessons, class singing, elementary drawing and needlework, besides English subjects and French.
Shares had been taken up to the number of one hundred and fifty-seven, so the Council had enough money at their disposal to justify58 the necessary initial outlay59. After an unsuccessful effort to obtain Lake House, which its owner declined to let for the purposes of a school, Cambray House, a fine old Georgian building with a beautiful garden, was taken at a rent of £200 a year. Some hundreds of pounds were spent in making this house suitable for its purpose, arranging a schoolroom (40 by 30 feet), a system of heating, and so on, while a part of it was set aside as a residence for the Lady Principal. The Committee appointed in this capacity Mrs. Procter, widow of Colonel Procter, ‘a highly educated officer,’ but her daughter Annie Procter, who was called Vice-Principal, was the actual head of the College. ‘The former,’ ran the first report, ‘is possessed60 of that age and experience which are necessary for the training of the young; the latter of that youth and vigour61 which are necessary for teaching.’ A younger sister had the post of assistant secretary, and several regular teachers and professors were also appointed.
Cambray House.
The College was actually opened on February 13, 1854, the pupils, eighty-two in number, having been examined a week before that date. Thus the inauguration[91] ceremony was the actual beginning of work. When writing her Jubilee63 history of the College, Miss Beale collected reminiscences from some who were present on the opening day. Nothing more impressive was forthcoming than a scrimmage of dogs in the cloak-room, the calling over of names, followed by immediate64 sorting into classes already arranged as a result of the examination, and that ‘various old gentlemen promenaded65 about the first few days, and held conclaves66 in a Board-Room on the right hand of the front door.’ The age of the pupils varied67 considerably68 from that of tiny mites69 to that of grown-up girls. They were arranged in different departments, the lowest being a kind of infant school on raised benches.
At first the numbers increased rapidly, and by the end of the year there were one hundred and twenty pupils. But the fees were too low, and the Committee soon had cause for anxiety over expenses. In the first year, 1854, more than £1300 was expended70 in regular salaries and in payments to visiting teachers; the accounts in December showed a deficit71 of £400. Matters improved but slowly in 1855, and in order to lessen72 expenses, various changes were suggested, such as the substitution of German, which the Vice-Principal could teach, for Latin, and an arrangement by which the pianoforte should be taught on a class system. In the general meeting of that year, it was resolved no longer to admit boys to the College, and with them disappeared the whole of the infant department, not to reappear till the Kindergarten was opened in 1882.
This change led to a slight diminution73 of numbers, and the report of the year 1856 (published in and dated February 1857), while it embodied74 many words of praise from the examiners and showed a balance of receipts[92] above expenditure75 in the current expenses, yet breathed a consciousness of many difficulties and obstacles to be overcome. It was acknowledged that had it been desirable to purchase furniture for the Lady Principal instead of paying her £25 a year for the use of her own, it could not have been done from the funds in hand. ‘In conclusion,’ said the Chairman, ‘your Council beg to express their thanks to those parents who, during the past year, have continued to place confidence in the College and its system. On their own part and on that of the Lady Principal and the Vice-Principal, they desire to assure the public that no efforts shall be wanting on their part to amend76 what may appear, on mature consideration, to be defective77.... They cannot depart from their fundamental principle, which, as they stated, is soundness rather than show; magna est veritas et pr?valebit.’
Next year, 1857, the numbers crept down, first to ninety-three, then to eighty-nine, and the capital account, which had never gone up, was little above £400. Shares which should have been £10, were offered for half that sum. The want of success was partly due to want of harmony between Miss Procter and the Council on points of educational method. In May 1858, when the numbers were again reduced, and the prospect48 of improvement very small, the Procters resigned; also the ladies who took boarders one by one gave up. So poor was the outlook for the College at this time that the Council might have felt justified78 in abandoning the whole scheme. Fortunately, however, those who possessed the foresight79 and courage, which could still carry it on, were supported by the circumstance that the lease of Cambray House had a couple more years to run. So it came to pass that in May 1858, within a fortnight of Miss Procter’s resignation, the Council advertised for a Lady Principal thus:—
[93]
Cheltenham Ladies’ College
‘A Vacancy80 having occurred in the Office of Lady Principal, Candidates for the Appointment are requested to apply by letter (with references) before the 1st of June, to J. P. Bell, Esq., Hon. Sec., Cheltenham.
‘A well-educated and experienced Lady (between the ages of 35 and 45) is desired, capable of conducting an Institution with not less than 100 day-pupils.
‘A competent knowledge of German and French, and a good acquaintance with general English Literature, Arithmetic, and the common branches of female education, are expected.
‘No Testimonials to be sent until applied for, and no answers will be returned except to Candidates apparently83 eligible84.’
The shareholders requested a general meeting in order to receive an explanation of the cause which led to the resignation of Miss Procter, and this was convened85 for June 2. The Committee was occupied during the fortnight which succeeded this in selecting and interviewing some of the fifty candidates for the Headship, and Miss Beale was elected on June 13. In July Miss Procter took her final leave in the following letter to Mr. Hartland:—
Glendale House, July 28, 1858.
‘My dear Sir,—I thank you much for your kind letter enclosing your cheque for £41, 10s. 6d.
‘I take this opportunity of sending you the keys of the College. The house has been cleaned throughout. The Chimneys have all been swept.
‘Some few stores,—nearly a ? cwt. of soap, some dip candles, and two new scrubbing brushes,—are in a closet in the pantry.
‘Two cast-iron fenders, of mine, have been removed from two of the class-rooms.—I remain, my dear Sir, yours very sincerely,
S. Anne Procter.’
Miss Beale heard of a vacancy on the staff of the[94] Ladies’ College in January 1858, when a Queen’s College friend, Miss Mulcaster, wrote her a letter interesting for the glimpses it gives both of Casterton and Cheltenham.
‘I am anxious,’ the letter ran, ‘that you should as soon as possible receive this letter, which is the very earliest reply in my power to make to yours.... I cannot feel very sorry on your own account for your leaving Casterton, although I do so at the manner of it.... I am very glad that you feel the discipline and teaching have been useful to you. I do not know that anything better could be desired for you than a return to Queen’s, but I have something, or rather a shadow of something I wish you to know in case you are disappointed there. I believe a place in the Ladies’ College at Cheltenham is vacant, and if so it might suit you. Miss Procter the Superintendent87 and many of the Committee are considered High Church. Miss Brewer88, I am sure, would be very much pleased to hear from you, and I think would be disposed to facilitate your appointment, if there is still a vacancy. She, being one of the teachers, could answer any inquiries89 better than I. There is no home provided for the teachers by the Committee, but they have hitherto made private arrangements to live together.
‘Cheltenham, to my mind, presents unusual advantages as a place of residence; combining those of town and country, and last but not least those to be derived90 from Canon Boyd’s ministry91 and dear Mr. Bromby’s. I could give you some introductions, but it is too soon to talk of those things yet....’
Miss Beale must have answered this, and probably wrote at the same time to Miss Brewer, whom she had known at Queen’s; but there are no further letters existing on the subject. But she herself told in later life that she declined to apply for the post as she had resolved to seek a Headship. There is no mention of Cheltenham in the diary until May, but it appears that other schools were either applied for or considered. On February 17 we have ‘For school at Holloway.’ On February 18, ‘A letter from a Greenwich school.’ This was perhaps visited on the 22nd, when the diary mentions a journey to Greenwich; but it is not named[95] again. On March 2 we find ‘Mamma wrote to Mrs. Birch about school at Reigate.’ On March 24, ‘Talked to Mr. Hyde about College at Camberwell.’ This possibly appears again in the record of April 17: ‘Mary decides against Camberwell scheme.’
A letter mentioned in Miss Beale’s diary as received from Cheltenham on May 18 was doubtless in answer to her application, after the advertisement had appeared, to inform her that she was accepted as a candidate for the vacant Headship. The record of the next few weeks, brief as it is, bears marks of the zeal and activity with which everything possible was done to procure92 testimonials and the recommendations of friends; while, at the same time, the work went on at Barnes, and the sheets of the Textbook were passing through the press. The writer was obviously full of anxiety and hope, having perceived in Cheltenham a promising93 sphere of work; but she did not relax the daily spiritual combat to which we owe the existence of the diary.
On receipt of a favourable94 answer she went at once to see Mr. Plumptre, and wrote to Dr. Trench95. After the Casterton experience it was necessary to have further recommendations than those which she had taken there from Queen’s College. Among the friends to whom she wrote was Mrs. Lancaster, who replied by return:—
‘I am very sorry that you did not tell me about Cheltenham before: I am one of the Proprietors97! or Committee or something! and my brother is Vice-Principal—indeed he almost established it. I have now written to him telling him my thoughts as to the maturity98 of your mind and judgment99, and I hope it may be successful. If you are not quite determined100 against Penitentiary101 work there is a very nice thing for a Lady Superintendent ... about which the Hon. and Rev9. C. Harris ... would give you full particulars.... It is worked by a[96] Committee, but the Lady Superintendent would be allowed to do as she liked....’
In the course of the next fortnight many more letters were received. Among them one from Miss Elwall of the Barnes School. She wrote:—
‘ ... You have succeeded in making subjects usually styled dry, positively102 attractive, whilst your plan has been successful in forming not merely superficial scholars even whilst producing results in a remarkably103 short period.
‘Your gentleness of manner, patience, and lady-like deportment are all that could be desired, and should you leave me I shall feel the greatest regret at the termination of an engagement which has been equally agreeable to myself and to my pupils.—I am, dear Miss Beale, with much esteem104, yours most sincerely,
M. J. Elwall.’
One from Mrs. Curling, the wife of Dr. Curling, an eminent105 physician and her father’s friend, runs:—
‘39 Grosvenor Street, June 12, 1858.
‘ ... I shall be truly happy if any recommendation of mine can promote your success. I have had the pleasure of knowing you many years, and in your journeys with me abroad I have had frequent opportunities of witnessing your tact106 and common sense, as well as good temper, and believe you to possess in addition the power of management essential for such an appointment. I am sure that the College would be fortunate in obtaining your assistance.’
Some friends wrote direct to the Cheltenham Council. The testimony107 borne to Miss Beale’s high character is genuine and strong, if quaintly108 expressed according to present-day notions in some of these. Mr. Shepheard wrote:—
‘Silverdale, June 1858.
‘I have the greatest pleasure in expressing my high opinion of Miss Beale’s character and attainments109 generally. Though she holds opinions on the subject of sacramental grace entirely111 opposed to my own, it is no more than her due that I should say[97] that her high sense of duty, and inflexible112 integrity of principle, and conscientious113 following of the path of duty without regard to consequences, have won my highest respect and esteem.
‘The circumstances under which she left the Clergy Daughters’ School in this place, were such, that I cannot speak of them in detail, out of unwillingness114 to reflect on the conduct of the authorities there, but I consider her dismissal by them to have been highly honourable115 to herself.
‘As a Teacher, I have reason to believe that she is very highly accomplished116 and has been very successful—though I say this from general impressions only.
H. Shepheard, M.A.
Incumbent of Casterton, late Fellow of Oriel College, Oxford117, and late Head Master of Cheam School, Surrey.’
‘Trinity Terrace, Cheltenham.
‘A friend has asked me whether I can do anything to advance the interests of Miss Beale....
‘Miss Beale is not personally known to me, but from all I have heard she is a very conscientious and hard-working person, as well as one whose attainments are very high in most and I believe all of the departments necessary for the successful discharge of so important an office. Whether her talents for government correspond with her educational skill, and her very high religious and moral character, I know not; but I have been anxious to fulfil her wish in drawing your attention to her application, which she feared might be overlooked as one among many.
The most interesting of this series of letters is one from Miss Alston to Mrs. Lancaster. This, through Mr. Bellairs, undoubtedly119 helped to influence the Council, whose members were wise enough to seek for character as much as attainment110 in the new Head. Others had dwelt on Miss Beale’s talent and power and single-hearted devotion to her calling; Miss Alston could also speak of her life and value at home.
‘Donnington Rectory, June 12, 1858.
‘ ... I heard from Miss Beale this morning that the Cheltenham[98] College had written for her testimonials. I hope she may obtain the appointment she desires, it seems one for which she is so well qualified120. Of her power of teaching others, and making them delight in their studies, there is no doubt. But you do not know her as I do, in her home and daily life; there all look up to her and seek her counsel. Our friendship commenced when we were eighteen; since that time I have not only profited, I trust, by the instruction she has given me in the pursuit of various studies, but I have always consulted her on all my plans, where the welfare of others has been concerned, and have found her counsel full of common sense and kind consideration for the feelings of those we desired to help or instruct. She is good-tempered and has plenty of tact, but shows instantly her dislike to anything untrue in word or act. Forgive this long letter, but I thought you might have some influence, and I am much interested for my friend, and at the same time feel that I should rather place any one I loved under her than with any one else I have met. With kind regards,—Believe me yours very sincerely,
Eliza Ann Alston.’
On June 14 came a letter summoning Miss Beale to Cheltenham. Her diary does not tell us where she stayed, or give any particulars of the interviews she had with the Council as a body, or with individuals. It records her election on the 16th, and the fact that Mr. Bellairs came to breakfast on the 17th. On the same day she saw Mr. Hartland and Dr. Comyn. By the single word ‘dress,’ which concludes her meagre entries of what were such momentous121 events for her, hangs a little tale of personal need supplied by the kind thought of a sister who willingly lent a blue silk gown for the would-be Lady Principal to wear at her first interview with her Council. Absorption in the Textbook and kindred subjects had precluded122 care of the writer’s wardrobe, and when this important moment came, it was felt that neither the simple black nor the mouse-coloured grey was equal to the occasion.[99] The conscientious care of the borrowed plumes123 is still remembered.
On June 18 she returned from Cheltenham, full of hope, to write innumerable letters—stamps, under their ancient name of ‘heads,’ became almost a daily entrance in the diary, which sometimes served as account-book;—to finish the lessons at Barnes, for the school year had not yet ended; and to correct the proofs of the Textbook, with the satisfaction of feeling that she had in it something that would help in the formation of her teachers-to-be. She received many congratulations. Some letters were kept; Mr. Shepheard’s is given, as it bears upon a subject which was about to cause fresh trouble.
‘Silverdale, June 24, 1858.
‘ ... I must tell you how pleased I am on your account personally, at your success—and the triumph of justice in your case over unfairness and tyranny. My pleasure would be indeed great, if I had any hope that you might be led to reconsider those opinions on sacramental grace which have formed the only subject of division in opinion between us. The longer I live the more I am convinced of their danger as containing in fact the germ of all popery; and subverting124 the very nature and essence of vital godliness, by substituting the form for the reality, the outward act for the inward spiritual power and operation.
‘I wish you would read Mr. Litton’s book, The Church of Christ, on that subject; it is unanswerable.
‘What is exactly the name and nature of your College?—Very sincerely yours with all kindest regards,
H. Shepheard.’
There were also through these weeks a good many interchanged visits on matters both of business and pleasure. The name of Miss Vincent occurs twice among others mentioned in the diary. This is the lady who in August of 1858 became Lady Superintendent at[100] Casterton, and remained there till 1888, when she died there in harness at the age of seventy-five.
Dorothea Beale was not, however, destined125 to take possession of her kingdom without a conflict. The old religious dispute was handed on from Casterton, for Mr. Shepheard, with one other whose name does not appear, felt he could not but mention the points he held to be ‘dangerous’ in her religious beliefs. And there was certainly still another letter to discourage the Council, from M. Mariette to Mr. Penrice Bell, questioning Miss Beale’s suitability for the post of Head Mistress on the ground that she was not sympathetic in manner. This appears to have been disregarded, but the partisans126 of Dean Close felt bound to consider the accusation127 of High Church opinions. Miss Beale first learned of the opposition128 which had arisen to her appointment on July 12, in the following letter from Mr. Bell:—
‘July 10, 1858.
‘Dear Miss Beale,—Letters have been put into my hand to-day which cause me much anxiety, and before consulting the Council upon the subject, I think it best to communicate with you, begging an immediate reply in the same spirit of unreserve and candour and frankness as that in which I now write.
‘When here I took pains to impress upon your mind the fact that the Council could not in justice to those whom they represent accept a Lady Principal who holds High Church views or sympathises with them; and that they had rejected most satisfactory testimonials from one of the candidates solely129 on the ground of her professing130 doctrinal views of that character. I was thus explicit131 with you in order to prevent any misunderstanding upon this most important question, but nothing fell from your lips to lead me to suppose you were open to an objection of that nature. I forbore from motives132 of delicacy133 (and probably the other members of the Council did the same), to press this subject upon you in the shape of direct enquiry, feeling sure you would not conceal134 your real views if they were indeed such as I plainly stated to be opposed to those entertained by the founders of the institution. The letters are marked[101] “Private,” so I am not at liberty to name the writers, but I will quote the material portions; and I may remark that both gentlemen speak in the highest terms of your qualifications in general.
‘“She, Miss Beale, is very High Church to say the least, and holds ultra views of Baptismal Regeneration.” ... “She has also a serious and deep religious feeling, and a self-denying character. But she is decidedly High Church. Her opinions on the vital and critical question of sacramental grace are altogether those of the High Church or Tractarian School—assuming the opus operatum of the Sacraments to convey, of necessity and in all cases, the inward grace of which that Sacrament is the sign.”
‘Now you have undoubtedly full right to entertain such opinions as in your conscience you believe to be true, but at the same time you are (and were) bound in honour of good faith, on such occasion as the offering of yourself for the important position to which you have been recently appointed, to avow136 your opinions openly and distinctly; especially when made acquainted with the views of those responsible for your selection.
‘If it be the fact that you do hold opinions such as are attributed to you, it is clear that you will not only inflict138 serious injury on the Institution, but also on yourself, by assuming the office—for if you hold us to the appointment the Council would and must, I imagine, at once give you the three months’ notice (or salary equivalent), and cancel it at the earliest period, publishing their reasons for so extraordinary a step. If, however, you are misrepresented, I shall heartily139 rejoice on every account, but I beg of you, by return of post, to favour me with a definite reply to the two questions I feel it now my duty to put to you:—
‘1st. Do you or do you not hold the doctrine of the opus operatum in the Sacrament of Baptism?
‘2nd. Do you or not sympathise with and are attached to the principles of the High Church party?—Believe me to remain, yours very truly,
J. Penrice Bell, Hon. Sec.
‘PS.—I think it better not to print the Prospectus until the present difficulty is settled in some way.’
This letter, which must have come as a bolt from the blue, was a blow, but not of a crushing nature to one[102] whose energies were ever braced140 by conflict. Miss Beale wrote at once to Mr. Bellairs to tell him what had happened, and to Mr. Bell in answer to his attack. Both letters are given, as they clearly state her religious position. To Mr. Bellairs she wrote:—
‘31 Finsbury Square, July 12.
‘ ... Although our acquaintance has been very short, owing to the kindness with which you received me, I cannot help considering you in some measure as a friend, and feeling that you will understand me: perhaps, also, your office both as Clergyman and Vice-President of the Cheltenham Ladies’ College gives me some right to trouble you upon this occasion.
‘I received this morning a note from Mr. Bell, accusing me of want of candour in not speaking of my religious views, although they were in no way alluded141 to by the Council, and telling me he has been informed that my opinions are those of the Tractarian School. Now, as I have never seen more than a few pages of the “Tracts,” I cannot positively contradict such a statement. I have explained somewhat at large to him what are my opinions; I will not repeat them to you, as you will no doubt see the letter. That my views differ considerably from those of the ultra-evangelical party, of which Mr. Carus Wilson is one of the leaders, and the Record the accredited142 organ, I freely acknowledge; but I think them those of a moderate member of the English Church, and on seeing your name as Vice-President, I concluded the Ladies’ College was not identified with any exclusive party. I have endeavoured to be perfectly143 candid81, for I could not undertake so great a work without the hope of God’s blessing144. Should my own letter not be considered decisive evidence against me, perhaps you would think it worth while to write to Mrs. Lancaster or Mrs. Greene (with whom I think you said you were acquainted). With both of them I have spoken freely on religious subjects, and they would tell you whether they believed my opinions to be extreme. As nothing is farther from my wishes than to deceive the Council, I forward to you by this post two books, which I have published without my name—not because I was ashamed of expressing what I thought right, but because one naturally shrinks from exposing without necessity one’s inner religious life. I feel this more especially with regard to the smaller book, which I must therefore ask you not to mention to others. I[103] send them to you, because they may assist you in coming to a right conclusion, whether for or against my retaining the post to which I have been appointed, and I think the Council will be in a great measure guided by your decision.’
To Mr. Penrice Bell:—
‘31 Finsbury Square, July 12, 1858.
‘On looking at the Prospectus of the Casterton School, I saw on the Committee the names of those who professed145 ultra-evangelical views; I therefore felt it my duty distinctly to explain, before accepting the appointment, wherein my opinions differed from those which I knew them to hold. It was after I had made that statement that I was appointed. On looking at the papers of the Cheltenham College, I found the name of Mr. Close in conjunction with that of Mr. Bellairs and others. From this and what I had heard privately I was led to conclude that you were not identified with any particular party in the Church; that your views were not more exclusive than those of the Educational Committee of Queen’s College, who had expressed themselves satisfied with my teaching. I also placed in your hands a testimonial from the Professor of Theology there; my opinion was still further strengthened by your accepting the recommendation of the Dean of Westminster and including the Liturgy146 of the Church of England amongst the subjects taught.
‘Believing myself to hold moderate, certainly not ultra, views I did not feel myself open to the charge brought against me after my appointment. I think you will remember the subject of religion was in no way alluded to before.
‘Having thus, I hope, justified myself from any accusation of want of candour, I proceed to answer your questions as briefly147 as I can.
‘If you understand by the opus operatum “efficacy” of Baptism,—that all who are baptized are therefore saved (a doctrine which Mr. Shepheard assured me was held by some), I explicitly148 state that I do not hold that doctrine. I believe Baptism to be “an outward and visible sign of an inward and spiritual grace given unto us” (Catechism); to be the appointed means for admitting members into the Church of Christ, according to St. Paul’s teaching that “Christ gave Himself for the Church that He might save it and cleanse149 it by the washing of water by the word” (Eph. v. 26); that “according to His mercy we are saved by the washing of regeneration and renewing of the[104] Holy Ghost” (Tit. iii. 5); that we are therein made “members of Christ” and adopted “children of God”; but when I use the word “regeneration” I do not understand that spoken of by St. John when he says, “he that is born of God cannot sin,” but that gift of life without which we are unable even to think any good thing; a gift which the Bishop solemnly declares to have been already received by those who come to be confirmed (Confirmation Service), but which requires daily renewal150, a gift which we may lose by grieving God’s Holy Spirit by neglecting the means of grace, by hiding our Lord’s treasure. And this teaching I hold because I find it in the Bible, which I acknowledge with the sixth article to be our only rule of faith—because it seems to me the basis of St. Paul’s teaching (1 Cor. iii.; 2 Cor. vi. 10)—and it makes our responsibilities higher and deeper if we acknowledge with the Apostle in the language which he used to the whole of the Corinthian Church, that we are “the temples of the Holy Ghost.” I feel that any partial views which tell us of God’s grace being given to some and not to others are contrary to the whole tenor151 of Scripture152. Your second question again cannot be categorically answered, since it has never been defined what are the opinions of the High Church party; I would say that I differ from some who assume that title....[37] I think no one could entertain a greater dread153 than I of those Romish opinions entertained by some “who went out from us, but were not of us”; indeed during the last six months I have been engaged in preparing an English History for the use of schools, because Ince’s Outlines (a book used in your College) inculcates Romish doctrines154.
‘In conclusion, I must apologize for the unmethodical way in which I have expressed myself, as I am writing in great haste to catch the next post, and I have thought it right to reply to you without consulting any person or book, except the Bible and Prayer Book. I have endeavoured to be perfectly candid;—should the Council decide that my views are so unsound that I am unfit to occupy the position to which I have been appointed, I shall trust that they will allow me to make as public a statement of my opinions as they are obliged to make of my dismissal, for I shall feel that after this no person of moderate views will trust me, and my own conscience would not allow me to work with the extreme party in either high or low church.’
The diary of these two days gives a hint of the anxiety[105] Miss Beale underwent when the attack was made upon her, and before she could receive answers to her own letters:—
‘July 12.—Mr. B(ell)’s letter about H(igh) Church from Cheltenham, and my answer. Some vanity. (Prayer) for resignation.
‘July 13.—Sent proofs to Cheltenham. Dined at the Curlings. Dr. Clarke very agreeable. Felt angry with Mr. Shepheard.’
Mr. Bell’s reply to Miss Beale’s letter suggests that the difficulty before the Council was less directly one of religious principle than that of working a school where certain precise opinions were not professed.
‘July 13, 1858.
‘My dear Miss Beale,—I have to-day laid your reply before Mr. Hartland and Dr. Comyn, the only two of my colleagues now here, and we have no fault to find with its tenor, which is explicit enough. Whether or not the fact of your holding the opinions thus avowed155 will lead to difficulties hereafter, we cannot say. If you feel conscientiously156 bound in and out of class to make known and inculcate your distinctive157 views of doctrine according to your interpretation158 of scripture and of our Liturgy and Articles, then it is easy to foresee the result. If, however (as I hope), you regard it of primary importance in the instruction of the children to inculcate love to God and His Son, and charity (in its manifold phases and with its relative duties), towards our fellows—treating as of far minor159 importance the doctrinal points about which good men differ so widely,—then I should not anticipate any active opposition from those to whom your peculiar160 opinions may be known.
‘The gentleman (a resident clergyman of some influence) to whom the two quoted letters were addressed, is now absent for a few days; and it remains161 to be seen whether his scruples162 and objections are, if not removed, at least rendered quiescent163 by your reply. If he should withdraw his children, and make known the grounds of doing so, the effect would undoubtedly be prejudicial to the College, and the experiment of conducting it under your auspices might be futile164. Much may depend on what answer you can conscientiously make to this question:—
Holding the opinions you have expressed, should you consider[106] it a duty and feel it incumbent on you to inculcate them in your Divinity instruction to the pupils?
If you could favour me by a few lines by return of post (as I leave before post hour on Friday morning) on this point, which I can annex165 to your letter of to-day, I could see my colleagues on the subject once more, and arrange what shall be done in my absence.—Yours truly,
J. Penrice Bell, Hon. Sec.’
Among Miss Beale’s papers exists an undated and much erased166 note, which appears to be her answer to the above. It begins with the remark: ‘I am glad to find the Council has not decided135 that I am so great a heretic as from your first letter I feared they would’; and it closes with the statement: ‘I quite feel it to be a Christian167 duty, if it be possible to live peaceably with all men, not giving heed168 to those things which minister questions rather than godly edifying169, but I am sure you will feel I should be unworthy of your confidence could I through any fear of consequences resort to the least untruthfulness.’ Meanwhile Mr. Bellairs also wrote:—
‘ ... Mr. Bell’s letter was, I imagine, of a private character, as I had heard nothing of the subject of it before the arrival of your note of to-day.
‘So far as I am concerned, my impression is that we of the Council have nothing to do now with your private Theological opinions, whatever they are, unless they are so extreme as would damage the College (and within tolerably wide limits, I individually am very indifferent on the matter). I trust you have good sense and propriety170 sufficient to induce you to avoid all teaching which would in any degree disturb the character which the College ought, in my opinion, to maintain: viz. a place of learning in which all members of the Church of England may receive religious instruction in an honest and straightforward171 way, according to the teaching of the Bible and the formularies of the Church, without extreme interpretation one way or the other. I shall probably hear more of this matter when I see Mr. Bell.’
The storm was over. Though individuals of quite opposing views would, later on, occasionally cavil172 at[107] points in Miss Beale’s method of teaching Scripture, she never really experienced further trouble on this ground. There are many, like the unknown lady to whose ‘High Church’ opinions the Council took objection, who would have felt they could not work in the spirit of compromise implied in the letters of Mr. Bell and Mr. Bellairs. There are some who might have agreed to do so, and in terror of offending, would have shirked the difficult task of religious instruction to the point of making it a lifeless thing. Miss Beale undertook it with her eyes open, and in spite, or possibly because of the hindrances173 in the way, her Scripture lessons became the very pivot174 of her teaching.
The diary again is very characteristic at this point. The anxiety of mind caused by her trouble was not permitted to excuse ill-temper. ‘July 4. Letter from Cheltenham. Neglect of prayer. Several times rude.’ This was the day which practically settled the fate of the Ladies’ College, and was the greatest visible landmark175 in Miss Beale’s life. In the ensuing fortnight, the last she spent at home, though there is an entry for every day, the name of Cheltenham does not occur. Two visits from Miss Brewer, who had been re-appointed to the Cheltenham staff with the title of Vice-Principal, ‘shopping,’ and ‘turning out,’ suggest preparations. There is no entry of the day on which she went, but from deduction176 it was August 4, and in the company of her mother.
点击收听单词发音
1 cloisters | |
n.(学院、修道院、教堂等建筑的)走廊( cloister的名词复数 );回廊;修道院的生活;隐居v.隐退,使与世隔绝( cloister的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 patronage | |
n.赞助,支援,援助;光顾,捧场 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 rite | |
n.典礼,惯例,习俗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 nervously | |
adv.神情激动地,不安地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 specially | |
adv.特定地;特殊地;明确地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 distinguished | |
adj.卓越的,杰出的,著名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 inception | |
n.开端,开始,取得学位 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 notably | |
adv.值得注意地,显著地,尤其地,特别地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 rev | |
v.发动机旋转,加快速度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 inspector | |
n.检查员,监察员,视察员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 kennels | |
n.主人外出时的小动物寄养处,养狗场;狗窝( kennel的名词复数 );养狗场 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 insignificant | |
adj.无关紧要的,可忽略的,无意义的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 beheld | |
v.看,注视( behold的过去式和过去分词 );瞧;看呀;(叙述中用于引出某人意外的出现)哎哟 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 continental | |
adj.大陆的,大陆性的,欧洲大陆的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 grandiose | |
adj.宏伟的,宏大的,堂皇的,铺张的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 worthy | |
adj.(of)值得的,配得上的;有价值的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 census | |
n.(官方的)人口调查,人口普查 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 auspices | |
n.资助,赞助 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 proprietary | |
n.所有权,所有的;独占的;业主 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 benefactors | |
n.捐助者,施主( benefactor的名词复数 );恩人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 incumbent | |
adj.成为责任的,有义务的;现任的,在职的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 disciple | |
n.信徒,门徒,追随者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 ERECTED | |
adj. 直立的,竖立的,笔直的 vt. 使 ... 直立,建立 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 zeal | |
n.热心,热情,热忱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 geniality | |
n.和蔼,诚恳;愉快 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 acting | |
n.演戏,行为,假装;adj.代理的,临时的,演出用的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 legitimate | |
adj.合法的,合理的,合乎逻辑的;v.使合法 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 vow | |
n.誓(言),誓约;v.起誓,立誓 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 incumbency | |
n.职责,义务 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 alas | |
int.唉(表示悲伤、忧愁、恐惧等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 diminutive | |
adj.小巧可爱的,小的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 clergy | |
n.[总称]牧师,神职人员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 eloquent | |
adj.雄辩的,口才流利的;明白显示出的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 rivalry | |
n.竞争,竞赛,对抗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 actively | |
adv.积极地,勤奋地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 zealously | |
adv.热心地;热情地;积极地;狂热地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 noted | |
adj.著名的,知名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 founders | |
n.创始人( founder的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 modesty | |
n.谦逊,虚心,端庄,稳重,羞怯,朴素 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 remarkable | |
adj.显著的,异常的,非凡的,值得注意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 expiration | |
n.终结,期满,呼气,呼出物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 treasurer | |
n.司库,财务主管 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 shareholders | |
n.股东( shareholder的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 doctrine | |
n.教义;主义;学说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 attained | |
(通常经过努力)实现( attain的过去式和过去分词 ); 达到; 获得; 达到(某年龄、水平、状况) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 alterations | |
n.改动( alteration的名词复数 );更改;变化;改变 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 prospectus | |
n.计划书;说明书;慕股书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 prospect | |
n.前景,前途;景色,视野 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 prospectuses | |
n.章程,简章,简介( prospectus的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 applied | |
adj.应用的;v.应用,适用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 bishop | |
n.主教,(国际象棋)象 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 kindly | |
adj.和蔼的,温和的,爽快的;adv.温和地,亲切地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 virtue | |
n.德行,美德;贞操;优点;功效,效力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 restriction | |
n.限制,约束 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 interfere | |
v.(in)干涉,干预;(with)妨碍,打扰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 license | |
n.执照,许可证,特许;v.许可,特许 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 forestalled | |
v.先发制人,预先阻止( forestall的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 justify | |
vt.证明…正当(或有理),为…辩护 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 outlay | |
n.费用,经费,支出;v.花费 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60 possessed | |
adj.疯狂的;拥有的,占有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61 vigour | |
(=vigor)n.智力,体力,精力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62 engraving | |
n.版画;雕刻(作品);雕刻艺术;镌版术v.在(硬物)上雕刻(字,画等)( engrave的现在分词 );将某事物深深印在(记忆或头脑中) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63 jubilee | |
n.周年纪念;欢乐 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64 immediate | |
adj.立即的;直接的,最接近的;紧靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65 promenaded | |
v.兜风( promenade的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
66 conclaves | |
n.秘密会议,教皇选举会议,红衣主教团( conclave的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
67 varied | |
adj.多样的,多变化的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
68 considerably | |
adv.极大地;相当大地;在很大程度上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
69 mites | |
n.(尤指令人怜悯的)小孩( mite的名词复数 );一点点;一文钱;螨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
70 expended | |
v.花费( expend的过去式和过去分词 );使用(钱等)做某事;用光;耗尽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
71 deficit | |
n.亏空,亏损;赤字,逆差 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
72 lessen | |
vt.减少,减轻;缩小 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
73 diminution | |
n.减少;变小 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
74 embodied | |
v.表现( embody的过去式和过去分词 );象征;包括;包含 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
75 expenditure | |
n.(时间、劳力、金钱等)支出;使用,消耗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
76 amend | |
vt.修改,修订,改进;n.[pl.]赔罪,赔偿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
77 defective | |
adj.有毛病的,有问题的,有瑕疵的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
78 justified | |
a.正当的,有理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
79 foresight | |
n.先见之明,深谋远虑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
80 vacancy | |
n.(旅馆的)空位,空房,(职务的)空缺 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
81 candid | |
adj.公正的,正直的;坦率的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
82 upwards | |
adv.向上,在更高处...以上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
83 apparently | |
adv.显然地;表面上,似乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
84 eligible | |
adj.有条件被选中的;(尤指婚姻等)合适(意)的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
85 convened | |
召开( convene的过去式 ); 召集; (为正式会议而)聚集; 集合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
86 zinc | |
n.锌;vt.在...上镀锌 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
87 superintendent | |
n.监督人,主管,总监;(英国)警务长 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
88 brewer | |
n. 啤酒制造者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
89 inquiries | |
n.调查( inquiry的名词复数 );疑问;探究;打听 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
90 derived | |
vi.起源;由来;衍生;导出v.得到( derive的过去式和过去分词 );(从…中)得到获得;源于;(从…中)提取 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
91 ministry | |
n.(政府的)部;牧师 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
92 procure | |
vt.获得,取得,促成;vi.拉皮条 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
93 promising | |
adj.有希望的,有前途的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
94 favourable | |
adj.赞成的,称赞的,有利的,良好的,顺利的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
95 trench | |
n./v.(挖)沟,(挖)战壕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
96 whit | |
n.一点,丝毫 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
97 proprietors | |
n.所有人,业主( proprietor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
98 maturity | |
n.成熟;完成;(支票、债券等)到期 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
99 judgment | |
n.审判;判断力,识别力,看法,意见 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
100 determined | |
adj.坚定的;有决心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
101 penitentiary | |
n.感化院;监狱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
102 positively | |
adv.明确地,断然,坚决地;实在,确实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
103 remarkably | |
ad.不同寻常地,相当地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
104 esteem | |
n.尊敬,尊重;vt.尊重,敬重;把…看作 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
105 eminent | |
adj.显赫的,杰出的,有名的,优良的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
106 tact | |
n.机敏,圆滑,得体 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
107 testimony | |
n.证词;见证,证明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
108 quaintly | |
adv.古怪离奇地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
109 attainments | |
成就,造诣; 获得( attainment的名词复数 ); 达到; 造诣; 成就 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
110 attainment | |
n.达到,到达;[常pl.]成就,造诣 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
111 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
112 inflexible | |
adj.不可改变的,不受影响的,不屈服的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
113 conscientious | |
adj.审慎正直的,认真的,本着良心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
114 unwillingness | |
n. 不愿意,不情愿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
115 honourable | |
adj.可敬的;荣誉的,光荣的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
116 accomplished | |
adj.有才艺的;有造诣的;达到了的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
117 Oxford | |
n.牛津(英国城市) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
118 privately | |
adv.以私人的身份,悄悄地,私下地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
119 undoubtedly | |
adv.确实地,无疑地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
120 qualified | |
adj.合格的,有资格的,胜任的,有限制的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
121 momentous | |
adj.重要的,重大的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
122 precluded | |
v.阻止( preclude的过去式和过去分词 );排除;妨碍;使…行不通 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
123 plumes | |
羽毛( plume的名词复数 ); 羽毛饰; 羽毛状物; 升上空中的羽状物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
124 subverting | |
v.颠覆,破坏(政治制度、宗教信仰等)( subvert的现在分词 );使(某人)道德败坏或不忠 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
125 destined | |
adj.命中注定的;(for)以…为目的地的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
126 partisans | |
游击队员( partisan的名词复数 ); 党人; 党羽; 帮伙 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
127 accusation | |
n.控告,指责,谴责 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
128 opposition | |
n.反对,敌对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
129 solely | |
adv.仅仅,唯一地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
130 professing | |
声称( profess的现在分词 ); 宣称; 公开表明; 信奉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
131 explicit | |
adj.详述的,明确的;坦率的;显然的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
132 motives | |
n.动机,目的( motive的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
133 delicacy | |
n.精致,细微,微妙,精良;美味,佳肴 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
134 conceal | |
v.隐藏,隐瞒,隐蔽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
135 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
136 avow | |
v.承认,公开宣称 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
137 avows | |
v.公开声明,承认( avow的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
138 inflict | |
vt.(on)把…强加给,使遭受,使承担 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
139 heartily | |
adv.衷心地,诚恳地,十分,很 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
140 braced | |
adj.拉牢的v.支住( brace的过去式和过去分词 );撑牢;使自己站稳;振作起来 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
141 alluded | |
提及,暗指( allude的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
142 accredited | |
adj.可接受的;可信任的;公认的;质量合格的v.相信( accredit的过去式和过去分词 );委托;委任;把…归结于 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
143 perfectly | |
adv.完美地,无可非议地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
144 blessing | |
n.祈神赐福;祷告;祝福,祝愿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
145 professed | |
公开声称的,伪称的,已立誓信教的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
146 liturgy | |
n.礼拜仪式 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
147 briefly | |
adv.简单地,简短地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
148 explicitly | |
ad.明确地,显然地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
149 cleanse | |
vt.使清洁,使纯洁,清洗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
150 renewal | |
adj.(契约)延期,续订,更新,复活,重来 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
151 tenor | |
n.男高音(歌手),次中音(乐器),要旨,大意 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
152 scripture | |
n.经文,圣书,手稿;Scripture:(常用复数)《圣经》,《圣经》中的一段 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
153 dread | |
vt.担忧,忧虑;惧怕,不敢;n.担忧,畏惧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
154 doctrines | |
n.教条( doctrine的名词复数 );教义;学说;(政府政策的)正式声明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
155 avowed | |
adj.公开声明的,承认的v.公开声明,承认( avow的过去式和过去分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
156 conscientiously | |
adv.凭良心地;认真地,负责尽职地;老老实实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
157 distinctive | |
adj.特别的,有特色的,与众不同的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
158 interpretation | |
n.解释,说明,描述;艺术处理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
159 minor | |
adj.较小(少)的,较次要的;n.辅修学科;vi.辅修 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
160 peculiar | |
adj.古怪的,异常的;特殊的,特有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
161 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
162 scruples | |
n.良心上的不安( scruple的名词复数 );顾虑,顾忌v.感到于心不安,有顾忌( scruple的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
163 quiescent | |
adj.静止的,不活动的,寂静的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
164 futile | |
adj.无效的,无用的,无希望的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
165 annex | |
vt.兼并,吞并;n.附属建筑物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
166 erased | |
v.擦掉( erase的过去式和过去分词 );抹去;清除 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
167 Christian | |
adj.基督教徒的;n.基督教徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
168 heed | |
v.注意,留意;n.注意,留心 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
169 edifying | |
adj.有教训意味的,教训性的,有益的v.开导,启发( edify的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
170 propriety | |
n.正当行为;正当;适当 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
171 straightforward | |
adj.正直的,坦率的;易懂的,简单的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
172 cavil | |
v.挑毛病,吹毛求疵 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
173 hindrances | |
阻碍者( hindrance的名词复数 ); 障碍物; 受到妨碍的状态 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
174 pivot | |
v.在枢轴上转动;装枢轴,枢轴;adj.枢轴的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
175 landmark | |
n.陆标,划时代的事,地界标 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
176 deduction | |
n.减除,扣除,减除额;推论,推理,演绎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |