Zoroastrianism is commonly supposed to derive8 its name from its founder9 Zoroaster, a Bactrian sage10 or prophet, who lived in the reign11 of King Gushtasp the First. Zoroaster’s name has come down to us from antiquity12 in much the same relation to this form of religion as that of Moses to Judaism, or of Sakya-Mouni to Buddhism13. As in those cases, certain learned commentators14 have endeavoured to show that the alleged15 founder was purely16 mythical17 and had no real historical existence, basing their argument mainly on the fact that a number of supernatural attributes, and embodiments of metaphysical and theological ideas, became attached to the name, just as a whole cycle of solar myths became associated with the name of Hercules. But this seems to be carrying scepticism too far. Experience shows that religions have generally[198] originated in the crystallisation of ideas floating in solution at certain periods of the evolution of societies, about the nucleus18 of some powerful personality. Nearly all the great religions of the world, such as Buddhism, Confucianism, Christianity, and Mahometanism, clearly had historical founders20, and it would be hypercritical to deny that such a man as Jesus of Nazareth really lived because many of his sayings and doings may be traced to applications, more or less erroneous, of ancient prophecies, or because his human nature became transfigured into the Logos and other metaphysical conceptions of the Alexandrian philosophy.
In the case of Zoroaster, the argument for his historical existence seems even stronger, for his name is connected with historical reigns21 and places, and his genuine early history contains nothing supernatural or improbable. He is represented as simply a deep thinker and powerful preacher, like Luther, who gave new form and expression to the vague religious and philosophical22 ideas of his age and nation, reformed its superstitions24 and abuses, and converted the leading minds of his day, including the monarch25, by the earnestness and eloquence26 of his discourses28. At any rate, for my purpose I shall assume his personality, for my object is not to write a critical essay on the origin and development of the Zoroastrian religion, but to show that in its fundamental ideas and essential spirit it approximates wonderfully to those of the most advanced modern thought, and gives the outline of a creed29 which goes further than any other to meet the practical wants of the present day, and to reconcile the conflict between faith and science. This will be most clearly and vividly30 shown by assuming the commonly accepted historical existence[199] of Zoroaster to be true, and by confining myself to the broad, leading principles of his religion, without dwelling31 on its varying phases, or on the mythical legends and ritualistic observances which, as in the case of all other old religions, have crystallised about the primitive32 idea and the primitive founder.
Zara-thustra, or, as he is commonly called, Zoroaster, and the religion which goes by his name, are known to us mainly from the sacred books which have been preserved by the modern Parsees. The Parsees, a small remnant of the Persians who under Cyrus founded one of the mightiest34 empires of the ancient world, flying from their native country to escape from persecution35 after the Mahometan conquest, formed a colony in India, and are now settled at Bombay. They form a small but highly intelligent community, who have preserved their ancient religion, and, fortunately, some considerable fragments of their sacred scriptures37. The oldest of these are written in the Gata dialect of the Avesta or Zend language, which is contemporary with Sanskrit, and bears much the same relation to it as Latin does to Greek. The primitive Aryan family at some very remote period became divided into two branches, and radiated from their Central Asian home in two directions. The Hindoo branch migrated to the south into the Punjaub and Hindostan; the Iranian westwards, into Bactria and Persia; while other successive waves of Aryan migration38 in prehistoric39 times rolled still further westwards over Europe, obliterating40 all but a few traces of the aboriginal41 population.
The period of this separation of the Iranian and Hindoo races must be very remote, for the Rig-Veda is probably at least 4,000 years old, and the divergence42[200] between its form of Sanskrit and the Gata dialect of the Zend is already as great as that between two kindred European languages such as Greek and Latin. The divergence of religious ideas is also evidently of very early date. In the Hindoo, and all other races of the primitive Aryan stock, the word used for gods and good spirits is taken from the root ‘div,’ to shine. Thus, Daeva in Sanskrit, Zeus and Theos in Greek, Deus in Latin, Tius in German, Diews in Lutheranism, Dia in Irish, Dew in Kymric, all mean the bright or shining one represented by the vault43 of heaven. But in Iranian the word has an opposite sense, and the ‘deevs’ correspond to our ‘devils.’
The primitive Aryan religions were evidently all derived44 from a contemplation of the powers and phenomena45 of nature. The sky, with its flood of light and vault of ethereal blue, was considered to be the highest manifestation46 of a Supreme47 Power; while the sun and moon, the stars and planets, the winds and clouds, the earth and waters, were personified, either as symbols of the Deity48 or as subordinate gods. The original simple faith was thus apt to degenerate49 into a system of polytheism, and, as the gods came to be represented by visible forms, into idolatry.
Zoroaster appears to us, like Mahomet at a later age and among a ruder people, as a prophet or reformer who abolished these abuses and restored the ancient faith in a loftier and more intellectual form, adapted to the use of an advanced and civilised society. The records of his life and teaching have fortunately been preserved in so authentic50 a form, that distant as he is from us we can form a singularly accurate idea of who he was and what he taught.
[201]
Some 3,200 years ago a sight might have been seen in the ancient city of Balkh—the famous capital of Bactria, the ‘Mother of Cities’—very like that witnessed some fourteen centuries later at our own Canterbury. The king and his chief nobles and courtiers were assembled to hear the discourse27 of a preacher who proposed to teach them a better religion. Gushtasp listened to Zoroaster, as Ethelbert listened to Augustine, and in each case reason and eloquence carried conviction, and the nation became converts to the new doctrine4.
This conversion was effected without miracles, for it is expressly stated in the celebrated52 speech of the prophet, preserved in the 30th chapter of the Yasna, that he relied solely53 on persuasion54 and argument. Ferdousi, the Persian Homer, thus describes the first interview between Zoroaster and Gushtasp: ‘Learn,’ he said, ‘the rites and doctrines of the religion of excellence55. For without religion there cannot be any worth in a king. When the mighty56 monarch heard him speak of the excellent religion, he accepted from him the excellent rites and doctrines.’
The doctrines of this ‘excellent religion’ are extremely simple. The leading idea is that of monotheism, but the one God has far fewer anthropomorphic attributes, and is relegated57 much farther back into the vague and infinite, than the god of any other monotheistic religion. Ahura-Mazda, of which the more familiar appellation59 Ormuzd is an abbreviation, means the ‘All-knowing Lord;’ he is said sometimes to dwell in the infinite luminous60 space, and sometimes to be identical with it. He is, in fact, not unlike the inscrutable First Cause, whom we may regard with awe61 and reverence62, with love and hope, but whom we cannot[202] pretend to define or to understand. But the radical63 difference between Zoroastrianism and other religions is that it does not conceive of this one God as an omnipotent64 Creator, who might make the universe as he chose, and therefore was directly responsible for all the evil in it; but as a Being acting65 by certain fixed66 laws, one of which was, for reasons totally inscrutable to us, that existence implied polarity, and therefore that there could be no good without corresponding evil.
Dr. Haug, who is the greatest authority on all questions connected with the Zend scriptures, says: ‘Having arrived at the grand idea of the unity36 and indivisibility of the Supreme Being, Zoroaster undertook to solve the great problem which has engaged the attention of so many wise men of antiquity and even in modern times, viz. how are the imperfections discernible in the world, the various kind of evils, wickedness, and baseness, compatible with the goodness, holiness, and justness of God? This great thinker of remote antiquity solved this difficult question philosophically67, by the supposition of two prim33?val causes, which, though different, were united, and produced the world of material things as well as that of spirit. These two prim?val principles are the two moving causes in the universe, united from the beginning, and therefore called twins. They are present everywhere—in the Ahura Mazda, or Supreme Deity, as well as in man.’
They are called in the Vendidad Spento Mainyush, or the ‘beneficent spirit,’ and Angro Mainyush, or the ‘hurtful spirit.’ The latter is generally known as Ahriman, the Prince of Darkness; and the former as Ormuzd, is identified with Ahura Mazda, the good God, though, strictly68 speaking, Ahura Mazda is the great[203] unknown First Cause, who comprehends within himself both principles as a necessary law of existence, and in whom believers may hope that evil and good will ultimately be reconciled.
Anquetil du Perron, the first translator of the Zendavesta, in his ‘Critical View of the Theological and Ceremonial System of Zar-thurst,’ thus sums up the Parsee creed: ‘The first point in the theological system of Zoroaster is to recognise and adore the Master of all that is good, the Principle of all righteousness, Ormuzd, according to the form of worship prescribed by him, and with purity of thought, of word, and of action, a purity which is marked and preserved by purity of body. Next, to have a respect, accompanied by gratitude70, for the intelligence to which Ormuzd has committed the care of nature (i.e. to the laws of nature), to take in our actions their attributes for models, to copy in our conduct the harmony which reigns in the different parts of the universe, and generally to honour Ormuzd in all that he has produced. The second part of their religion consists in detesting71 the author of all evil, moral and physical, Ahriman—his productions, and his works; and to contribute, as far as in us lies, to exalt72 the glory of Ormuzd by enfeebling the tyranny which the Evil Principle exercises over the world.’
It is evident that this simple and sublime73 religion is one to which, by whatever name we may call it, the best modern thought is fast approximating. Men of science like Huxley, philosophers like Herbert Spencer, poets like Tennyson, might all subscribe74 to it; and even enlightened Christian19 divines, like Dr. Temple, are not very far from it when they admit the idea of a Creator behind the atoms and energies, whose original impress,[204] given in the form of laws of nature, was so perfect as to require no secondary interference. Admit that Christ is the best personification of the Spenta Mainyush, or good principle in the inscrutable Divine polarity of existence, and a man may be at the same time a Christian and a Zoroastrian.
The religion of Zoroaster has, however, this great advantage in the existing conditions of modern thought, that it is not dragged down by such a dead weight of traditional dogmas and miracles as still hangs upon the skirts of Christianity. Its dogmas are comprised in the statement that there is one supreme, unknown, First Cause, who manifests himself in the universe under fixed laws which involve the principle of polarity. This is hardly so much a dogma as a statement of fact, or of the ultimate and absolute truth at which it is possible for human faculty75 to arrive. No progress of science or philosophy conflicts with it, but rather they confirm it, by showing more and more clearly with every discovery that this is in very fact and deed the literal truth. Religion, or the feeling of reverence and love for the Great Unknown which lies beyond the sphere of human sense and reason, shines more brightly through this pure medium than through the fogs of misty76 metaphysics; and we can worship God in spirit and in truth without puzzling our brains as to the precise nature of the Logos, or exercising them on the insoluble problem how one can be equal to three, and at the same time three equal to one.
As regards miracles, which are another millstone about the neck of Catholic Christianity, the religion of Zoroaster is entirely77 free from them. There are, it is true, a few miraculous78 myths about him in some of the[205] later writings in the Pehlvi language, as of his conception by his mother drinking a cup of the sacred Homa, but these are of no authority and form no part of the religion. On the contrary, the original scriptures which profess79 to record his exact words and precepts80 disclaim82 all pretension83 to divine nature or miraculous power, and base the claims of the ‘excellent religion’ purely on reason. This is an immense advantage in the ‘struggle for life,’ when every day is making it more impossible for educated men to believe that real miracles ever actually occurred, and when the evidence on which they were accepted is crumbling84 to pieces under the light of critical enquiry. The Parsee has no reason to tremble for his faith if a Galileo invents the telescope or a Newton discovers the law of gravity. He has no occasion to argue for Noah’s deluge85, or for the order of Creation described in Genesis. Nay86 even, he may remain undisturbed by that latest and most fatal discovery that man has existed on the earth for untold87 ages, and, instead of falling from a high estate, has risen continuously by slow and painful progress from the rudest origins. How many orthodox Christians88 can say the same, or deny that their faith in their sacred books and venerable traditions has been rudely shaken?
The code of morality enjoined89 by the Zoroastrian religion is as pure as its theory is perfect. Dr. Haug enumerates90 the following sins denounced by its code, and considered as such by the present Parsees: Murder, infanticide, poisoning, adultery on the part of men as well as women, sorcery, sodomy, cheating in weight and measure, breach91 of promise whether made to a Zoroastrian or non-Zoroastrian, telling lies and deceiving,[206] false covenants92, slander93 and calumny94, perjury95, dishonest appropriation96 of wealth, taking bribes97, keeping back the wages of labourers, misappropriation of religious property, removal of a boundary stone, turning people out of their property, maladministration and defrauding98, apostasy99, heresy100, rebellion. These are positive injunctions. The following are condemnable101 from a religious point of view: Abandoning the husband; not acknowledging one’s children on the part of the father; cruelty towards subjects on the part of a ruler; avarice102, laziness, illiberality103 and egotism, envy. In addition there are a number of special precepts adapted to the peculiar104 rites of the Zoroastrian religion which aim principally at the enforcement of sanitary105 rules, kindness to animals, hospitality to strangers and travellers, respect to superiors, and help to the poor and needy106.
It is evident that this is the most complete and comprehensive code of morals to be found in any system of religion. It comprises all that is best in the codes of Buddhism, Judaism, and Christianity, with a much more ample definition of many vices107 and virtues109 which, even in the Christian religion, are left to be drawn111 as inferences rather than inculcated as precepts. Thus, laziness, cheating, selfishness, and envy are distinctly defined as crimes, and their opposites as virtues, and not merely left to be inferred from the general maxims112 of ‘loving your neighbour as yourself,’ and ‘doing unto others as you would be done by.’ The comprehensiveness and liberal spirit of the code is also remarkable113, for we are repeatedly told that these rules of morality apply to non-Zoroastrians as well as to Zoroastrians. The application of religious precepts to practical life is another distinguishing feature. Thus kindness to[207] animals is specially114 enjoined, and it is considered a sin to ill-treat animals of the good creation, such as cattle, sheep, horses, or dogs, by starving, beating, or unnecessarily killing115 them. With true practical wisdom, however, the ‘falsehood of extremes’ is avoided, and this precept81 is not, as in the case of Brahminism and Buddhism, carried so far as to prohibit altogether the taking of animal life, which is expressly sanctioned when necessary. This sober practical wisdom, or what Matthew Arnold calls ‘sweet reasonableness,’ is a very characteristic feature of Zoroaster’s religion, and very remarkable as having been taught at so early a period in the history of civilisation116.
Another precept, which might well have been made by an English board of health in the nineteenth century, is not to pollute water by throwing impure117 matter into it.
The only special Parsee rites which would be unsuited for modern European society, are the worship of the sacred fire and the disposal of the dead. It is true that the former is distinctly understood to be merely a symbol of the Deity, and used exactly as water is in baptism, or as the ascending118 flame of candles and smoke from swinging incense119 are in the Catholic ritual, to bring more vividly before the minds of the worshippers the idea of the spirit soaring upwards120 towards heaven. Still, in modern society fire is too well understood as merely a particular form of chemical combination, and is too familiar as the strong slave and household drudge121 of man, to acquire a leading place in a religious ritual where it has not been hallowed by the usage of a long line of ancestors and the traditions of a venerable antiquity. All that can be said is, that if religious[208] rites and ceremonies are to be maintained in an age when science has become the prevailing122 mode of thought, appropriate symbolism, especially that of music, must more and more take the place of appeals to the intellect on metaphysical questions, and of repetitions of traditional formul? which have lost all living significance.
Another Parsee rite6, which is even less adapted for general usage, is that of disposing of the dead on towers of silence, where the body moulders123 away or is devoured124 by birds of prey125. It originates in a poetical126 motive127 of not defiling128 the pure elements, fire, earth, or water, by corruption129; but it is obviously unsuited for the conditions of civilisation and climate which prevail in crowded cities under a humid sky.
There is little prospect130 therefore of any general conversion to the sect131 of Zoroastrians; but what seems probable is the gradual transformation132 of existing modes both of religious and secular133 thought into something which is, in principle, very closely akin69 to the ‘excellent religion’ taught by the Bactrian prophet.
The miraculous theory of the universe being virtually dead, the only theory that can reconcile facts with feelings, and the ineradicable emotions and aspirations134 of the human mind with the incontrovertible conclusions of science, is that of a remote and more or less unknown and incomprehensible First Cause, which has given the original atoms and energies so perfect an impress from the first, that all phenomena are evolved from them by fixed laws, one of the principal of such laws being that of polarity, which develops the ever-increasing complexities135 and contrasts of the inorganic136 and organic worlds, of moralities, philosophies, religions, and human societies.[209] True religion consists in a recognition of this truth, a feeling of reverence in presence of the unknown, and, above all, a feeling of love and admiration137 for the good principle in whatever form it is manifested, in the beauties of nature and of art, in moral and physical purity and perfection, and all else that falls within the domain138 of the Prince of Light, in whose service, whether we conceive of him as an abstract principle, or accept some personification of him as a living figure, we enlist139 as loyal soldiers, doing our best to fight in his ranks against the powers of evil.
The application of the all-pervading principle of polarity is exemplified in the realm of art. The glorious Greek drama turned mainly on the conflict between resistless fate and heroic free-will, and is typified in its highest form by ?schylus, when he depicts140 Prometheus chained to the rock hurling141 defiance142 at the tyrant143 of heaven. Our own Milton, in like manner, gives us the spectacle of the fallen archangel opposing his indomitable will and fertile resources to the extremity144 of adverse145 circumstance and to Almighty146 power.
The greatest of modern dramas, Goethe’s ‘Faust,’ turns so entirely on the opposition147 between the human soul striving after the infinite, and the spirit der verneint, who combats ideal aspirations with a cynical148 sneer149, that it might well be called a Zoroastrian drama. It is a picture of the conflict between the two opposite principles of good and evil, of affirmation and negation150, of the beautiful and the ugly, personified in Faust and Mephistopheles, and it is painted on a background of the great mysterious unknown. ‘Wer darf ihn nennen?’
Who dares to name Him,
Who to say of Him, ‘I believe’?
[210]
Who is there ever with a heart to dare
To utter, ‘I believe Him not’?
So in poetry, Tennyson, the poet of modern thought, touches the deepest chords when he asks—
and paints in the sharpest contrast on the background of the unknown, the conflict between the faith that
God is love indeed,
And love creation’s final law,
and the harsh realities of nature, which
Red in tooth and claw
or again in his later work, ‘The Ancient Sage,’ he says—
Thou canst not prove the Nameless, O my son!
Nor yet disproven.
In like manner in the works of art which embrace a wider range, and hold up the mirror to human nature, as in Shakespeare’s plays, and the novels of Walter Scott and other great authors, the interest arises mainly from the polarity of the various characters. We care little for the goody-good heroes or vulgar villains154, but we recognise a touch of that nature which makes all the world akin in a Macbeth drawn by metaphysical suggestion to wade155 through a sea of blood; in Othello’s noble nature caught like a lion in the toils156 by the net of circumstances woven by a wily hunter; in Falstaff, a rogue157, a liar58, and a glutton158, yet made almost likeable by his ready wit, imperturbable159 good-humour, and fertile resources. Shakespeare is, in fact, the greatest of artists, because he is the most multipolar. He has poles of[211] sympathy in him which, as the poles of carbon attract so many elements and form so many combinations, enable him to take into his own nature, assimilate, and reproduce every varied160 shade of character from a Miranda to a Caliban, from an Imogen to a Lady Macbeth, from a Falstaff to an Othello. Sir Walter Scott and all our great novelists have the same faculty, though in a less degree, and are great in exact proportion as they have many poles in their nature, and as those are poles of powerful polarity. The characters and incidents which affect us strongly and dwell in the memory are those in which the clash and conflict of opposites are most vividly represented. We feel infinite pity for a Maggie Tulliver dashing her young life, like a prisoned wild bird, against the bars of trivial and prosaic161 environment which hem51 her in; or for a Colonel Newcome opposing the patience of a gentle nature to the buffets162 of such a fate as meets us in the everyday world of modern life, the failure of his bank and the naggings of the Old Campaigner. On a higher level of art we sympathise with a Lancelot and a Guinevere because they are types of what we may meet in many a London drawing-room, noble natures drawn by some fatal fairy fascination163 into ignoble164 acts, but still retaining something of their original nobility, and while
appearing to ordinary mortals little less than ‘archangels ruined.’ Or even if we descend166 to the lowest level of the penny dreadful or suburban167 drama, we find that the polarity between vice108 and virtue110, however coarsely delineated, is that which mostly fascinates the uncultured mind.
[212]
The affinity168 between Zoroastrianism and art is easily explained when we consider that in one respect it has a manifest advantage over most Christian forms of religion. Christianity in its early origins received a taint169 of Oriental asceticism171 which it never shook off, and which in the declining centuries of the Roman empire, and in the barbarism and superstition23 of the Middle Ages, developed into what may be almost called a devil-worship of the ugly and repulsive172. The antithesis173 between the flesh and the spirit was carried to such an extreme and false extent, that everything that was pleasant and beautiful came to be regarded as sinful, and the odour of sanctity was an odour which the passer-by would do well to keep on the windward side of. This leaven174 of asceticism is the rock upon which Puritanism, monasticism, and many of the highest forms of Christian life have invariably split. It is contrary to human nature, and directly opposed to the spirit of the life and doctrines of the Founder of the religion. Jesus, who was ‘a Jew living among Jews and speaking to Jews,’ adopted the true Jewish point of view of making religion amiable175 and attractive, and denouncing, as all the best Jewish doctors of the Talmud did, the pharisaical strictness which insisted on ritualistic observances and arbitrary restrictions176. In no passages of his life does the ‘sweet reasonableness’ of his character appear more conspicuous177 than where we find him strolling through the fields with his disciples178 and plucking ears of corn on the Sabbath, and replying to the formalists who were scandalised, ‘The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath.’ The ascetic170 bias179 subsequently introduced may have been a necessary element in counteracting180 the corruption[213] of Rome; but the pendulum181 in its reaction swung much too far, and when organised in the celibacy182 of the clergy183 and monastic institutions asceticism became the source of great evils. Even at a late period we can see in the reaction of the reign of Charles II. how antagonistic184 the puritanical185 creed, even of men like Cromwell and Milton, proved to the healthy natural instinct of the great mass of the English nation. And at the present day it remains186 one of the main causes of the indifference187 or hostility188 to religion which is so widely spreading among the mass of the population. Children are brought up to consider Sunday as a day of penance189, and church-going as a disagreeable necessity; while grown-up men, especially those of the working classes, resent being told that a walk in the country, a cricket-match, or a visit to a library or museum on their only holiday, is sinful.
In view of the approximation between the Zoroastrian religion and the forms of modern thought it is interesting to note how the former works among its adherents190 in actual practice. For, after all, the practical side of a religion is more important than its speculative191 or philosophical theories. Thus, for instance, the Quakers have a faith which is about the most reasonable of any of the numerous sects192 of Christianity and nearest to the spirit of its Founder, and yet Quakerism remains a narrow sect which is far from being victorious193 in the ‘struggle for life,’ Mahometanism, again, while dying out among civilised nations, shows itself superior to Christianity in the work of raising the barbarous, fetish-worshipping negroes of Africa to a higher level. And Mormonism, based on the most obvious imposture194 and absurdity195, is the only[214] new religion which, in recent times, has taken root and to a certain extent flourished.
Tried by this test, Zoroastrianism has made good its claim to be called the ‘excellent religion.’ Its followers196, the limited community of Parsees in India, are honourably197 distinguished198 for probity, intelligence, enterprise, public spirit, benevolence199, tolerance200, and other good qualities. By virtue of these qualities they have raised themselves to a prominent position in our Indian empire, and take a leading part in its commerce and industrial enterprise. The chief shipbuilder at Bombay, the first great native railway contractor201, the founder of cotton factories, are all Parsees, and they are found as merchants, traders, and shopkeepers in all the chief towns of British India, and distant places such as Aden and Zanzibar. Their commercial probity is proverbial, and, as in England, they have few written agreements, the word of a Parsee, like that of an Englishman, being considered as good as his bond. Their high character and practical aptitude202 for business are attested203 by the fact that the first mayor, or chairman of the Corporation of Bombay, was a Parsee who was elected by the unanimous vote both of Europeans and natives.
The position of women affords perhaps the best test of the real civilisation and intrinsic worth of any community. Where men consider women as inferior creatures it is a sure proof that they themselves are so. They are totally wanting in that delicacy204 and refinement205 of nature which distinguishes the true gentleman from the snob206 or the savage207, and are coarse, vulgar brutes208, however disguised under a veneer210 of outward polish. On the other hand, respect for women implies self-respect, nobility of nature, capability211 of rising to[215] high ideals above the sordid212 level of animal appetite and the selfish supremacy213 of brute209 force.
The Parsees in this respect stand high, far higher than any other Oriental people, and on a level with the best European civilisation. The equality of the sexes is distinctly laid down in the Zoroastrian scriptures. Women are always mentioned as a necessary part of the religious community. They have the same religious rites as the men. The spirits of deceased women are invoked214 as well as those of men. Long contact with the other races of India, and the necessity for some outward conformity215 to the practices of Hindoo and Mahometan rulers, did something to impair216 the position of females as regards public appearances, though the Parsee wife and mother always remained a principal figure in the Parsee household; and latterly, under the security of English rule, Parsee ladies may be seen everywhere in public, enjoying just as much liberty as the ladies of Europe or America. Nor are they at all behind their Western sisters in education, accomplishments217, and, it may be added, in daintiness of fashionable attire218. In fact, an eager desire for education has become a prominent feature among all classes of the Parsee community, and they are quite on a par1 with the Scotch219, German, and other European races in their efforts to establish schools, and in the numbers who attend, and especially of those who obtain distinguished places in the higher schools and colleges, such as the Elphinstone Institute and the Bombay University. Female education is also actively220 promoted, and no prejudices stand in the way of attendance at the numerous girls’ schools which have been established, or even of studying in medical colleges, where Parsee women attend lectures on all branches of[216] medical science along with male students. Those who know the position of inferiority and seclusion221 in which women are kept among all other Oriental nations can best appreciate the largeness and liberality of spirit of a religion which, in spite of all surrounding influences, has rendered such a thing possible in such a country as India.
Another prominent trait of the Parsee character is that of philanthropy and public spirit. In proportion to their numbers and means they raise more money for charitable objects than any other religious sect. And they raise it in a way which does the greatest credit to their tolerance and liberality. For instance, the Parsees were the principal subscribers to a fund raised in Bombay in aid of the ‘Scottish Corporation,’ and quite recently a Parsee gentleman gave 16,000l. towards the establishment of a female hospital under the care of lady doctors, although the benefit of such an institution would be confined principally to Mahometan and Hindoo women, Parsee women having no prejudice against employing male doctors.
The public spirit shown by acts like this is the trait by which the Parsee community is most honourably distinguished, and in respect of which it must be candidly222 confessed it far surpasses not only other Oriental races, but most European nations, including our own. Whatever the reason may be, the fact is certain that in England, while a great deal of money is spent in charity, lamentably223 little is spent from the enormous surplus wealth of the country on what may be called public objects. There is neither religious influence nor social opinion brought to bear on the numerous class who have incomes far beyond any possible want, to teach[217] them that it should be both a pleasure and a pride to associate their names with some act of noble liberality. A better spirit we may hope is springing up, and there have been occasional instances of large sums applied224 to public purposes, such as parks and colleges, by private individuals, principally of the trading and manufacturing classes, such as the Salts, Crossleys, Baxters, and Holloways; but on the whole the amount contributed is miserably225 small. It is probably part of the price we pay for aristocratic institutions that those who inherit or accumulate great fortunes consider it their primary object to perpetuate226 or to found great families. Be this as it may, a totally different spirit prevails among the Parsees of Bombay, where it has been truly stated that hardly a year passes without some wealthy Parsee coming forward to perform a work of public generosity227. The instance of Sir Jamsedjee Jijibhoy, who attained228 a European reputation for his noble benevolence, is only one conspicuous instance out of a thousand of this ‘public spirit’ which has become almost an instinctive229 element in Parsee society.
How far the large and liberal religion may be the cause of the large and liberal practice, it is impossible to say. Other influences have doubtless been at work. The Parsees are a commercial people, and commerce is always more liberal with its money than land. They are the descendants of a persecuted230 race, and as a rule it is better to be persecuted than to persecute231. Still, after making all allowances, it remains that the tree cannot be bad which bears such fruits; the religion must be a good one which produces good men and women and good deeds.
Statistical232 facts testify quite as strongly to the high[218] standard of the Parsee race, and the practical results which follow from the observance of the Zoroastrian ritual. A small death-rate and a large proportion of children prove the vigorous vitality233 of a race. The Parsees have the lowest death-rate of any of the many races who inhabit Bombay. The average for the two years 1881 and 1882 per thousand was for Hindoos 26·11; for Mussulmans 30·46; for Europeans 20·18; for Parsees 19·26. The percentage of children under two years old to women between fifteen and forty-five was 30·27 for Parsees, as against Hindoos 22·24, and Mussulmans 24·9, showing incontestably greater vitality and greater care for human life.
Of 6,618 male and 2,966 female mendicants in the city of Bombay, only five male and one female were Parsees.
These figures speak for themselves. It is evident that a religion in which such results are possible cannot be unfavourable to the development of the ‘mens sana in corpore sano;’ and that, although we may not turn Zoroastrians, we may envy some of the results of a creed which inculcates worship of the good, the pure, and the beautiful in the concerns of daily life, as well as in the abstract regions of theological and philosophical speculation234.
点击
收听单词发音
收听单词发音 |
1
par
|
|
| n.标准，票面价值，平均数量；adj.票面的，平常的，标准的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
2
conversion
|
|
| n.转化，转换，转变 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
3
doctrines
|
|
| n.教条( doctrine的名词复数 )；教义；学说；（政府政策的）正式声明 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
4
doctrine
|
|
| n.教义；主义；学说 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
5
rites
|
|
| 仪式，典礼( rite的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
6
rite
|
|
| n.典礼，惯例，习俗 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
7
probity
|
|
| n.刚直；廉洁，正直 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
8
derive
|
|
| v.取得；导出；引申；来自；源自；出自 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
9
Founder
|
|
| n.创始者，缔造者 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
10
sage
|
|
| n.圣人，哲人；adj.贤明的，明智的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
11
reign
|
|
| n.统治时期，统治，支配，盛行；v.占优势 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
12
antiquity
|
|
| n.古老；高龄；古物，古迹 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
13
Buddhism
|
|
| n.佛教（教义） | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
14
commentators
|
|
| n.评论员( commentator的名词复数 )；时事评论员；注释者；实况广播员 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
15
alleged
|
|
| a.被指控的，嫌疑的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
16
purely
|
|
| adv.纯粹地，完全地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
17
mythical
|
|
| adj.神话的；虚构的；想像的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
18
nucleus
|
|
| n.核，核心，原子核 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
19
Christian
|
|
| adj.基督教徒的；n.基督教徒 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
20
founders
|
|
| n.创始人( founder的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
21
reigns
|
|
| n.君主的统治( reign的名词复数 )；君主统治时期；任期；当政期 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
22
philosophical
|
|
| adj.哲学家的，哲学上的，达观的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
23
superstition
|
|
| n.迷信，迷信行为 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
24
superstitions
|
|
| 迷信，迷信行为( superstition的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
25
monarch
|
|
| n.帝王，君主，最高统治者 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
26
eloquence
|
|
| n.雄辩；口才，修辞 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
27
discourse
|
|
| n.论文，演说；谈话；话语；vi.讲述，著述 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
28
discourses
|
|
| 论文( discourse的名词复数 )； 演说； 讲道； 话语 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
29
creed
|
|
| n.信条；信念，纲领 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
30
vividly
|
|
| adv.清楚地，鲜明地，生动地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
31
dwelling
|
|
| n.住宅，住所，寓所 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
32
primitive
|
|
| adj.原始的；简单的；n.原(始)人，原始事物 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
33
prim
|
|
| adj.拘泥形式的，一本正经的；n.循规蹈矩，整洁；adv.循规蹈矩地，整洁地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
34
mightiest
|
|
| adj.趾高气扬( mighty的最高级 )；巨大的；强有力的；浩瀚的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
35
persecution
|
|
| n. 迫害,烦扰 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
36
unity
|
|
| n.团结，联合，统一；和睦，协调 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
37
scriptures
|
|
| 经文，圣典( scripture的名词复数 )； 经典 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
38
migration
|
|
| n.迁移，移居，（鸟类等的）迁徙 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
39
prehistoric
|
|
| adj.（有记载的）历史以前的，史前的，古老的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
40
obliterating
|
|
| v.除去( obliterate的现在分词 )；涂去；擦掉；彻底破坏或毁灭 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
41
aboriginal
|
|
| adj.（指动植物）土生的，原产地的，土著的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
42
divergence
|
|
| n.分歧，岔开 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
43
vault
|
|
| n.拱形圆顶，地窖，地下室 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
44
derived
|
|
| vi.起源；由来；衍生；导出v.得到( derive的过去式和过去分词 )；（从…中）得到获得；源于；（从…中）提取 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
45
phenomena
|
|
| n.现象 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
46
manifestation
|
|
| n.表现形式；表明；现象 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
47
supreme
|
|
| adj.极度的，最重要的；至高的，最高的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
48
deity
|
|
| n.神，神性；被奉若神明的人(或物) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
49
degenerate
|
|
| v.退步，堕落；adj.退步的，堕落的；n.堕落者 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
50
authentic
|
|
| a.真的，真正的；可靠的，可信的，有根据的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
51
hem
|
|
| n.贴边，镶边；vt.缝贴边；(in)包围，限制 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
52
celebrated
|
|
| adj.有名的，声誉卓著的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
53
solely
|
|
| adv.仅仅，唯一地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
54
persuasion
|
|
| n.劝说；说服；持有某种信仰的宗派 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
55
excellence
|
|
| n.优秀，杰出，(pl.)优点，美德 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
56
mighty
|
|
| adj.强有力的；巨大的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
57
relegated
|
|
| v.使降级( relegate的过去式和过去分词 )；使降职；转移；把…归类 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
58
liar
|
|
| n.说谎的人 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
59
appellation
|
|
| n.名称，称呼 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
60
luminous
|
|
| adj.发光的，发亮的；光明的；明白易懂的；有启发的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
61
awe
|
|
| n.敬畏，惊惧；vt.使敬畏，使惊惧 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
62
reverence
|
|
| n.敬畏，尊敬，尊严；Reverence:对某些基督教神职人员的尊称；v.尊敬，敬畏，崇敬 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
63
radical
|
|
| n.激进份子，原子团，根号；adj.根本的，激进的，彻底的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
64
omnipotent
|
|
| adj.全能的，万能的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
65
acting
|
|
| n.演戏，行为，假装；adj.代理的，临时的，演出用的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
66
fixed
|
|
| adj.固定的，不变的，准备好的；(计算机)固定的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
67
philosophically
|
|
| adv.哲学上；富有哲理性地；贤明地；冷静地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
68
strictly
|
|
| adv.严厉地，严格地；严密地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
69
akin
|
|
| adj.同族的，类似的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
70
gratitude
|
|
| adj.感激，感谢 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
71
detesting
|
|
| v.憎恶，嫌恶，痛恨( detest的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
72
exalt
|
|
| v.赞扬，歌颂，晋升，提升 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
73
sublime
|
|
| adj.崇高的，伟大的；极度的，不顾后果的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
74
subscribe
|
|
| vi.(to)订阅，订购；同意；vt.捐助，赞助 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
75
faculty
|
|
| n.才能；学院，系；(学院或系的)全体教学人员 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
76
misty
|
|
| adj.雾蒙蒙的，有雾的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
77
entirely
|
|
| ad.全部地，完整地；完全地，彻底地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
78
miraculous
|
|
| adj.像奇迹一样的，不可思议的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
79
profess
|
|
| v.声称，冒称，以...为业，正式接受入教，表明信仰 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
80
precepts
|
|
| n.规诫，戒律，箴言( precept的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
81
precept
|
|
| n.戒律；格言 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
82
disclaim
|
|
| v.放弃权利，拒绝承认 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
83
pretension
|
|
| n.要求；自命，自称；自负 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
84
crumbling
|
|
| adj.摇摇欲坠的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
85
deluge
|
|
| n./vt.洪水，暴雨，使泛滥 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
86
nay
|
|
| adv.不；n.反对票，投反对票者 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
87
untold
|
|
| adj.数不清的，无数的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
88
Christians
|
|
| n.基督教徒( Christian的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
89
enjoined
|
|
| v.命令( enjoin的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
90
enumerates
|
|
| v.列举，枚举，数( enumerate的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
91
breach
|
|
| n.违反，不履行；破裂；vt.冲破，攻破 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
92
covenants
|
|
| n.（有法律约束的）协议( covenant的名词复数 )；盟约；公约；（向慈善事业、信托基金会等定期捐款的）契约书 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
93
slander
|
|
| n./v.诽谤，污蔑 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
94
calumny
|
|
| n.诽谤，污蔑，中伤 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
95
perjury
|
|
| n.伪证；伪证罪 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
96
appropriation
|
|
| n.拨款，批准支出 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
97
bribes
|
|
| n.贿赂( bribe的名词复数 )；向（某人）行贿，贿赂v.贿赂( bribe的第三人称单数 )；向（某人）行贿，贿赂 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
98
defrauding
|
|
| v.诈取，骗取( defraud的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
99
apostasy
|
|
| n.背教，脱党 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
100
heresy
|
|
| n.异端邪说；异教 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
101
condemnable
|
|
| adj.该罚的，该受责备的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
|
102
avarice
|
|
| n.贪婪；贪心 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
103
illiberality
|
|
| n.吝啬，小气 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
104
peculiar
|
|
| adj.古怪的，异常的；特殊的，特有的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
105
sanitary
|
|
| adj.卫生方面的，卫生的，清洁的，卫生的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
106
needy
|
|
| adj.贫穷的，贫困的，生活艰苦的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
107
vices
|
|
| 缺陷( vice的名词复数 )； 恶习； 不道德行为； 台钳 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
108
vice
|
|
| n.坏事；恶习；[pl.]台钳，老虎钳；adj.副的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
109
virtues
|
|
| 美德( virtue的名词复数 )； 德行； 优点； 长处 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
110
virtue
|
|
| n.德行，美德；贞操；优点；功效，效力 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
111
drawn
|
|
| v.拖，拉，拔出；adj.憔悴的，紧张的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
112
maxims
|
|
| n.格言，座右铭( maxim的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
113
remarkable
|
|
| adj.显著的，异常的，非凡的，值得注意的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
114
specially
|
|
| adv.特定地；特殊地；明确地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
115
killing
|
|
| n.巨额利润；突然赚大钱，发大财 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
116
civilisation
|
|
| n.文明，文化，开化，教化 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
117
impure
|
|
| adj.不纯净的，不洁的；不道德的，下流的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
118
ascending
|
|
| adj.上升的，向上的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
119
incense
|
|
| v.激怒；n.香，焚香时的烟，香气 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
120
upwards
|
|
| adv.向上，在更高处...以上 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
121
drudge
|
|
| n.劳碌的人；v.做苦工，操劳 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
122
prevailing
|
|
| adj.盛行的；占优势的；主要的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
123
moulders
|
|
| v.腐朽( moulder的第三人称单数 )；腐烂，崩塌 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
124
devoured
|
|
| 吞没( devour的过去式和过去分词 )； 耗尽； 津津有味地看； 狼吞虎咽地吃光 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
125
prey
|
|
| n.被掠食者，牺牲者，掠食；v.捕食，掠夺，折磨 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
126
poetical
|
|
| adj.似诗人的；诗一般的；韵文的；富有诗意的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
127
motive
|
|
| n.动机，目的；adv.发动的，运动的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
128
defiling
|
|
| v.玷污( defile的现在分词 )；污染；弄脏；纵列行进 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
129
corruption
|
|
| n.腐败，堕落，贪污 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
130
prospect
|
|
| n.前景，前途；景色，视野 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
131
sect
|
|
| n.派别，宗教，学派，派系 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
132
transformation
|
|
| n.变化；改造；转变 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
133
secular
|
|
| n.牧师，凡人；adj.世俗的，现世的，不朽的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
134
aspirations
|
|
| 强烈的愿望( aspiration的名词复数 )； 志向； 发送气音； 发 h 音 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
135
complexities
|
|
| 复杂性(complexity的名词复数)； 复杂的事物 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
136
inorganic
|
|
| adj.无生物的；无机的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
137
admiration
|
|
| n.钦佩，赞美，羡慕 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
138
domain
|
|
| n.(活动等)领域，范围；领地，势力范围 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
139
enlist
|
|
| vt.谋取(支持等)，赢得；征募；vi.入伍 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
140
depicts
|
|
| 描绘，描画( depict的第三人称单数 )； 描述 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
141
hurling
|
|
| n.爱尔兰式曲棍球v.猛投，用力掷( hurl的现在分词 )；大声叫骂 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
142
defiance
|
|
| n.挑战，挑衅，蔑视，违抗 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
143
tyrant
|
|
| n.暴君，专制的君主，残暴的人 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
144
extremity
|
|
| n.末端，尽头；尽力；终极；极度 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
145
adverse
|
|
| adj.不利的；有害的；敌对的，不友好的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
146
almighty
|
|
| adj.全能的，万能的；很大的，很强的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
147
opposition
|
|
| n.反对，敌对 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
148
cynical
|
|
| adj.(对人性或动机)怀疑的，不信世道向善的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
149
sneer
|
|
| v.轻蔑；嘲笑；n.嘲笑，讥讽的言语 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
150
negation
|
|
| n.否定；否认 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
151
strife
|
|
| n.争吵，冲突，倾轧，竞争 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
152
shrieks
|
|
| n.尖叫声( shriek的名词复数 )v.尖叫( shriek的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
153
worthy
|
|
| adj.(of)值得的，配得上的；有价值的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
154
villains
|
|
| n.恶棍( villain的名词复数 )；罪犯；（小说、戏剧等中的）反面人物；淘气鬼 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
155
wade
|
|
| v.跋涉，涉水；n.跋涉 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
156
toils
|
|
| 网 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
157
rogue
|
|
| n.流氓；v.游手好闲 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
158
glutton
|
|
| n.贪食者，好食者 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
159
imperturbable
|
|
| adj.镇静的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
160
varied
|
|
| adj.多样的，多变化的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
161
prosaic
|
|
| adj.单调的，无趣的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
162
buffets
|
|
| （火车站的）饮食柜台( buffet的名词复数 )； （火车的）餐车； 自助餐 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
163
fascination
|
|
| n.令人着迷的事物，魅力，迷恋 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
164
ignoble
|
|
| adj.不光彩的，卑鄙的；可耻的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
165
dishonour
|
|
| n./vt.拒付（支票、汇票、票据等）；vt.凌辱，使丢脸；n.不名誉，耻辱，不光彩 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
166
descend
|
|
| vt./vi.传下来，下来，下降 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
167
suburban
|
|
| adj.城郊的，在郊区的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
168
affinity
|
|
| n.亲和力，密切关系 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
169
taint
|
|
| n.污点；感染；腐坏；v.使感染；污染 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
170
ascetic
|
|
| adj.禁欲的；严肃的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
171
asceticism
|
|
| n.禁欲主义 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
172
repulsive
|
|
| adj.排斥的，使人反感的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
173
antithesis
|
|
| n.对立；相对 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
174
leaven
|
|
| v.使发酵；n.酵母；影响 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
175
amiable
|
|
| adj.和蔼可亲的，友善的，亲切的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
176
restrictions
|
|
| 约束( restriction的名词复数 )； 管制； 制约因素； 带限制性的条件（或规则） | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
177
conspicuous
|
|
| adj.明眼的，惹人注目的；炫耀的，摆阔气的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
178
disciples
|
|
| n.信徒( disciple的名词复数 )；门徒；耶稣的信徒；（尤指）耶稣十二门徒之一 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
179
bias
|
|
| n.偏见，偏心，偏袒；vt.使有偏见 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
180
counteracting
|
|
| 对抗，抵消( counteract的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
181
pendulum
|
|
| n.摆，钟摆 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
182
celibacy
|
|
| n.独身(主义) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
183
clergy
|
|
| n.[总称]牧师，神职人员 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
184
antagonistic
|
|
| adj.敌对的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
185
puritanical
|
|
| adj.极端拘谨的；道德严格的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
186
remains
|
|
| n.剩余物，残留物；遗体，遗迹 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
187
indifference
|
|
| n.不感兴趣，不关心，冷淡，不在乎 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
188
hostility
|
|
| n.敌对，敌意；抵制［pl.］交战，战争 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
189
penance
|
|
| n.（赎罪的）惩罪 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
190
adherents
|
|
| n.支持者，拥护者( adherent的名词复数 )；党羽；徒子徒孙 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
191
speculative
|
|
| adj.思索性的，暝想性的，推理的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
192
sects
|
|
| n.宗派，教派( sect的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
193
victorious
|
|
| adj.胜利的，得胜的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
194
imposture
|
|
| n.冒名顶替，欺骗 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
195
absurdity
|
|
| n.荒谬，愚蠢；谬论 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
196
followers
|
|
| 追随者( follower的名词复数 )； 用户； 契据的附面； 从动件 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
197
honourably
|
|
| adv.可尊敬地，光荣地，体面地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
198
distinguished
|
|
| adj.卓越的，杰出的，著名的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
199
benevolence
|
|
| n.慈悲，捐助 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
200
tolerance
|
|
| n.宽容；容忍，忍受；耐药力；公差 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
201
contractor
|
|
| n.订约人，承包人，收缩肌 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
202
aptitude
|
|
| n.(学习方面的)才能，资质，天资 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
203
attested
|
|
| adj.经检验证明无病的，经检验证明无菌的v.证明( attest的过去式和过去分词 )；证实；声称…属实；使宣誓 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
204
delicacy
|
|
| n.精致，细微，微妙，精良；美味，佳肴 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
205
refinement
|
|
| n.文雅；高尚；精美；精制；精炼 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
206
snob
|
|
| n.势利小人，自以为高雅、有学问的人 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
207
savage
|
|
| adj.野蛮的；凶恶的，残暴的；n.未开化的人 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
208
brutes
|
|
| 兽( brute的名词复数 )； 畜生； 残酷无情的人； 兽性 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
209
brute
|
|
| n.野兽，兽性 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
210
veneer
|
|
| n.(墙上的)饰面，虚饰 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
211
capability
|
|
| n.能力；才能；(pl)可发展的能力或特性等 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
212
sordid
|
|
| adj.肮脏的，不干净的，卑鄙的，暗淡的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
213
supremacy
|
|
| n.至上；至高权力 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
214
invoked
|
|
| v.援引( invoke的过去式和过去分词 )；行使（权利等）；祈求救助；恳求 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
215
conformity
|
|
| n.一致，遵从，顺从 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
216
impair
|
|
| v.损害，损伤；削弱，减少 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
217
accomplishments
|
|
| n.造诣；完成( accomplishment的名词复数 )；技能；成绩；成就 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
218
attire
|
|
| v.穿衣，装扮[同]array；n.衣着；盛装 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
219
scotch
|
|
| n.伤口，刻痕；苏格兰威士忌酒；v.粉碎，消灭，阻止；adj.苏格兰(人)的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
220
actively
|
|
| adv.积极地，勤奋地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
221
seclusion
|
|
| n.隐遁，隔离 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
222
candidly
|
|
| adv.坦率地，直率而诚恳地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
223
lamentably
|
|
| adv.哀伤地，拙劣地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
224
applied
|
|
| adj.应用的；v.应用，适用 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
225
miserably
|
|
| adv.痛苦地；悲惨地；糟糕地；极度地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
226
perpetuate
|
|
| v.使永存，使永记不忘 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
227
generosity
|
|
| n.大度，慷慨，慷慨的行为 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
228
attained
|
|
| （通常经过努力）实现( attain的过去式和过去分词 )； 达到； 获得； 达到（某年龄、水平、状况） | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
229
instinctive
|
|
| adj.(出于)本能的；直觉的；(出于)天性的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
230
persecuted
|
|
| （尤指宗教或政治信仰的）迫害(~sb. for sth.)( persecute的过去式和过去分词 )； 烦扰，困扰或骚扰某人 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
231
persecute
|
|
| vt.迫害，虐待；纠缠，骚扰 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
232
statistical
|
|
| adj.统计的，统计学的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
233
vitality
|
|
| n.活力，生命力，效力 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
234
speculation
|
|
| n.思索，沉思；猜测；投机 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
| 欢迎访问英文小说网 |