As we look back over the history of the English novel, it would appear that every permanent work of fiction has been a great story. Robinson Crusoe, Clarissa, Tom Jones, Humphry Clinker, The Bride of Lammermoor, Pride and Prejudice, Esmond, David Copperfield, The Mill on the Floss, Richard Feverel, The Return of the Native, Treasure Island, The Last of the Mohicans, The Scarlet9 Letter, Huckleberry Finn, although they represent various shades of realism and romanticism, have all been primarily stories, in which we follow the fortunes of the chief actors with steady interest. These books owe their supremacy10 in fiction—at least, most of them do—to a combination of narrative11, character, and style; every one of them, if given in colloquial12 paraphrase13 to a group of men around a camp-fire, would be rewarded with attention.
[3]
Sometimes the very thing that gives a drama or a novel immediate14 currency makes it smell of mortality; by taking advantage of some hotly-discussed social question, general interest is awakened15; but when the question is obsolete16, what becomes of the work of art? I shall not venture to make a prediction; but I think it is at least possible that some of the earlier plays of Ibsen, like The Pretenders, may outlast17 some of the later ones, like Ghosts; the later ones blaze with the flames of public debate, the earlier reflect the light of the stars.
Of all forms of literature, the novel has suffered most by its desertion of art for propaganda. It has been debased by its popularity. It lends itself so easily as a channel for political, social or religious oratory18. Every theorist uses it as a megaphone. Although novels are as common as grasshoppers19, good stories are scarce. Now this desertion of art for propaganda is founded on the fallacy that a work of pure fiction cannot stand or ought not to stand by itself, but should lean on politics, social reform, science, or theology for support. We do not insist on a thesis in sculpture or music or painting or poetry. There have been, indeed, many attempts to turn Pegasus into a[4] cart-horse; and unfortunately the attempt is almost invariably successful.
I prefer novels that express the opinions of the characters in the story to those that express the opinions of the author. I do not mean that all novels ought to be impersonal20; such a result, even when most ardently21 desired by the novelist, is impossible of achievement. The work of every true artist reflects his personality, and is, in a sense, subjective22. Even the coldest novels betray their makers23' sympathies, and the standpoint from which they regard the world. But there is a difference between having ideas and arguing a case. Women who have ideas are always more interesting than those who have only opinions.
Why is it that so many novelists write their best books early in their careers? Is it not sometimes because the original impelling24 artistic25 impulse becomes dulled in contact with society, and thoughts take the place of thought? The thorns of this world spring up and choke them. It is by no accident that The Mill on the Floss is a greater novel than Daniel Deronda.
The most enduring novels come from the silent depths in a writer's soul, not from the[5] turbulent shallows. To live deeply is easier in a country where deep living has been done for centuries than in a country whose human history is brief. If we should really feel chagrined26 by America's native contribution to literature in comparison with that of Europe, we might justifiably27 console ourselves by comparing America with Australia. Surely one reason why the British today write novels rather better than the Americans, is because their roots go down deeper into the rich soil of the past. Men of genius are scarce in any locality, and I am not at this moment thinking of them; but I am constantly surprised at the large number of contemporary novels produced in Great Britain whose literary style bears the unmistakable stamp of distinction. There are leaders, whose names are known everywhere; there are men and women who might conceivably be leaders if they lived out of Europe. The best reason why many admirable twentieth century works of prose fiction in England fail to attract general attention is because the level of excellence28 is so high.
点击收听单词发音
1 mellow | |
adj.柔和的;熟透的;v.变柔和;(使)成熟 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 reverence | |
n.敬畏,尊敬,尊严;Reverence:对某些基督教神职人员的尊称;v.尊敬,敬畏,崇敬 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 hardy | |
adj.勇敢的,果断的,吃苦的;耐寒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 doctrinaire | |
adj.空论的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 triumphant | |
adj.胜利的,成功的;狂欢的,喜悦的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 axiomatic | |
adj.不需证明的,不言自明的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 belied | |
v.掩饰( belie的过去式和过去分词 );证明(或显示)…为虚假;辜负;就…扯谎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 disinterested | |
adj.不关心的,不感兴趣的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 scarlet | |
n.深红色,绯红色,红衣;adj.绯红色的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 supremacy | |
n.至上;至高权力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 narrative | |
n.叙述,故事;adj.叙事的,故事体的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 colloquial | |
adj.口语的,会话的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 paraphrase | |
vt.将…释义,改写;n.释义,意义 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 immediate | |
adj.立即的;直接的,最接近的;紧靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 awakened | |
v.(使)醒( awaken的过去式和过去分词 );(使)觉醒;弄醒;(使)意识到 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 obsolete | |
adj.已废弃的,过时的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 outlast | |
v.较…耐久 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 oratory | |
n.演讲术;词藻华丽的言辞 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 grasshoppers | |
n.蚱蜢( grasshopper的名词复数 );蝗虫;蚂蚱;(孩子)矮小的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 impersonal | |
adj.无个人感情的,与个人无关的,非人称的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 ardently | |
adv.热心地,热烈地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 subjective | |
a.主观(上)的,个人的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 makers | |
n.制造者,制造商(maker的复数形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 impelling | |
adj.迫使性的,强有力的v.推动、推进或敦促某人做某事( impel的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 artistic | |
adj.艺术(家)的,美术(家)的;善于艺术创作的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 chagrined | |
adj.懊恼的,苦恼的v.使懊恼,使懊丧,使悔恨( chagrin的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 justifiably | |
adv.无可非议地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 excellence | |
n.优秀,杰出,(pl.)优点,美德 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |