If the cells as well as men are immortal beings, the question naturally arises: what becomes of these incessantly6 dying cell generations? The answer must necessarily be apparent if[126] we can show, First, that the tie between the soul and the cells is indissoluble so that man’s organism, i. e., his spiritual body, consists of the same cell-individuals in a future life as here in time; Second, that the cells at the same time are self-existent and so independent of the soul, that in a future existence also, as here in time, they can and must build up man’s organism independently.
In such case no reason can be advanced that would prevent the dying cell-generations from immediately arising to a new and higher evolution, which, as we will endeavor to prove, must be identical with the upbuilding of the higher, transfigured body which man shall possess in a future life. This form of resurrection must be common to all organisms because they are all built according to the same general plan and are consequently subject to the same general process of evolution. Men are themselves the cells in another higher organism, humanity, which entity7 cannot rise to a richer life in another[127] world otherwise than through its upbuilding by the dying human generations under the new conditions that exist over there.
As a preliminary experiment in order to find out if the soul is indispensable to the life of the organism, or if the cells possibly might do without the soul, we may appropriately remove the latter from an organism and thus directly observe the importance of the soul for the cells.
But how can this be done, or at least, how may we deprive the organism of all influence from the soul? The physiologists8 have proved the possibility of such an experiment. It is fully9 established that the soul communicates with the body through the brain proper, or the cerebrum, and experience shows that this important organ may be removed and yet the body continue to live. We will here give briefly10 the results of such experiments made with animals.
If the brain be removed from a dove[128] or a hen, the bird often recovers from the radical11 operation and may remain alive for months and even years. But the dove has become an entirely12 different being. Immobile she sits on the same place. If she were not heard to breathe she might be taken for a stuffed bird. She lacks ability to judge her position and resembles a living machine that breathes, and swallows the food brought into her bill. The higher qualities of the dove are entirely lost. She shows no signs of fear and is incapable13 of initiative. She remains14 sitting in the same place and will not even fly down from small heights. If thrown into the air, she flies until her wings are tired or until she strikes an obstacle that she makes no effort to avoid. From the first day she must be fed artificially, but she digests her food as usual. The heart, the circulation of the blood, the respiration15, in short, all the vegetative functions of life continue regularly. Such a state[129] has been characterized by Flourens as a continuous sleep without dreams.
The same observations have been made with regard to dogs that have been deprived of a large part of the brain.
With lowered head and dead eyes, such a dog moves about indifferent to everything taking place around him. He shows no signs of fear, envy or joy. Neither threats nor friendly speech impress him. He never partakes in the barking of other dogs and is, as a rule, mute. Only should he be hungry he might set up a howl. Although indifferent to the strongest light or sound, he is not entirely blind or deaf. At the stronger sounds he might move his head slightly. All higher life is lost, but he digests his food and all vegetative functions continue just as regularly as if he were in normal condition.
Observation of the effect of certain accidents and diseases intimates that man forms no exception but that the same[130] results would probably be obtained from similar experiments with him. Though such experiments are out of the question, we can, however, in many different ways ascertain16 that the soul of man is also inactive in the vegetative functions of his organism. In earliest childhood this is perfectly17 evident. To possess a soul that has no functions is, as far as the result is concerned, identical with possessing no soul.
If we observe a child during the very earliest period of its life we will find that it behaves essentially18 just as the animals referred to above. Even the child remains in the position it is given and is unable to comprehend what happens around him. The child would likewise starve to death unless food were brought to his mouth, but he swallows and digests the nourishment19 normally. The movements of the heart, the circulation of the blood and respiration all take place as normally as with the fully developed man during[131] sleep when his soul also ceases to function.
The fact that the vegetative processes of the organism are not governed and controlled by the soul may be observed by anyone also during his conscious state. In regard to respiration we may repress it only for a few minutes. A command is soon given by certain cells in the central nerve-system which against the soul’s will brings the organ in question into action. Experience tells us that strong agitations20 generally disturb the vegetative processes. Sudden fear, for instance, accelerates the heart’s motion. Therefore these processes take place more evenly with animals deprived of their brain just because disturbing influences from the soul are then impossible.
Thus it is certain beyond doubt that the cells not only execute but regulate and control through the central nerve-system a multitude of functions in which the soul does not take part. But just as certain it is that there are[132] many functions which the cells could not perform without the co-operation of the soul. Vision, hearing, smelling, tasting and feeling would be entirely meaningless to the cells without the aid of the soul. The same is the case in a high degree with the motions of the body which also require such a higher guidance. The dove could fly, the dog walk, and so forth21, but the motions were relatively22 purposeless. The predetermined plan was lacking. The cells could assimilate the food, when brought into the body, but they could not search it in nature. Such action requires a power of combination that exceeds their measure of intelligence.
We see consequently that the cells may do without the soul in such functions as are not related to the exterior23 world comprehensible through our senses. Here they need the guidance of a higher, more developed intelligence. In the outside world with its more complicated relations, the soul is[133] to the cells very nearly what we mean by the word Providence24. The soul performs, in the interest of the cells, such a higher, regulating and guiding function.
The organism, then, is divided into two sections, separated by a sharply defined boundary. As independent and autocratic as the cells are in one of them, is the soul in the other. This bisection in two widely separated spheres is in itself remarkable25, but may be explained, if we remember that the organism is an individual composed of lower individuals. As different as these classes of individuals are in their nature and faculties26, equally incongruous are also the realms in which they dwell. The cells move in the atomic and molecular27 world. To them the molecules28 and atoms appear with a clearness comparable to the plainness with which the exterior world reveals itself to us. It is natural then that the cells attend to the vegetative functions of the organism which just fall within[134] their sphere of life, a sphere of which the soul can obtain knowledge only indirectly29 by way of deductions30. Equally obvious it is that only the soul can employ the organs of the body, the functions of which fall within the visible world.
We have now endeavored to obtain an understanding of the importance of the soul to the cells by depriving the latter of the direct influence of the former. This resulted from the removal of the brain, the organ by which the soul more directly expresses itself. But the soul is not actually removed from the body. It still remains in the whole cell-mass. The brain itself consists of cells, in which the soul is not present except as in all the other cells. The difference is only that the brain-cells are developed for the functions of thought, whereas the cells in the other organs are intended for their specific purposes. In order to remove the soul from the body we must remove the life from every cell. The soul, as we intend[135] to show, is inseparably connected with every particular cell-individual. But in order to understand how the cells may be at once independent of, and yet intimately united with the soul, we must first know what an organism really is. Its nature and fundamental idea is the only thing that can explain this remarkable relationship. But it is just here as to the essential qualities of an organism that the conceptions are generally very dim and vague.
Commonly the organism is thought of as a very complicated mechanism31 whose members and organs mutually depend upon each other. The organism is what the word implies, a tool. But every tool is intended for somebody’s use. Who this one is, is not said, simply because it is considered self-evident. If it be a human organism, it is obviously the man who uses it; if it be an animal organism, it is the animal, and so on. That this is a truth, cannot be denied; but still it[136] expresses only half the truth and scarcely that. Every organic body is used directly by the individuals that form its building material. The human organism is a society of cells, and it is these latter that first of all use the body’s organs for their purposes. But so dominating are the old ideas about the body, that even the cytologists themselves have not been able to shake them off. The cells are continually studied from man’s point of view, but what man may be from the cell’s point of view is never thought of.
We do not hereby deny all justification32 to the old conception. The body is also an organ for the soul. The latter, as experience shows, uses the body for its own specific purposes. But this takes place only to a somewhat limited extent. The incomparably larger part of the soul’s work, cares, and endeavors, is devoted33 to finding means to satisfy bodily wants. But so far as the soul provides for the necessities of the body, it acts as organ for the cells.[137] When man believes that he is running his own errands, he is in reality carrying out the missions of those beings that compose his body. These latter demand for their purposes, if not all, yet at least the largest part of all the work the soul performs in this world.
点击收听单词发音
1 immortal | |
adj.不朽的;永生的,不死的;神的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 immortality | |
n.不死,不朽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 renewal | |
adj.(契约)延期,续订,更新,复活,重来 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 glandular | |
adj.腺体的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 embryonic | |
adj.胚胎的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 incessantly | |
ad.不停地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 entity | |
n.实体,独立存在体,实际存在物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 physiologists | |
n.生理学者( physiologist的名词复数 );生理学( physiology的名词复数 );生理机能 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 fully | |
adv.完全地,全部地,彻底地;充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 briefly | |
adv.简单地,简短地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 radical | |
n.激进份子,原子团,根号;adj.根本的,激进的,彻底的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 incapable | |
adj.无能力的,不能做某事的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 respiration | |
n.呼吸作用;一次呼吸;植物光合作用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 ascertain | |
vt.发现,确定,查明,弄清 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 perfectly | |
adv.完美地,无可非议地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 essentially | |
adv.本质上,实质上,基本上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 nourishment | |
n.食物,营养品;营养情况 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 agitations | |
(液体等的)摇动( agitation的名词复数 ); 鼓动; 激烈争论; (情绪等的)纷乱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 forth | |
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 relatively | |
adv.比较...地,相对地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 exterior | |
adj.外部的,外在的;表面的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 providence | |
n.深谋远虑,天道,天意;远见;节约;上帝 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 remarkable | |
adj.显著的,异常的,非凡的,值得注意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 faculties | |
n.能力( faculty的名词复数 );全体教职员;技巧;院 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 molecular | |
adj.分子的;克分子的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 molecules | |
分子( molecule的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 indirectly | |
adv.间接地,不直接了当地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 deductions | |
扣除( deduction的名词复数 ); 结论; 扣除的量; 推演 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 mechanism | |
n.机械装置;机构,结构 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 justification | |
n.正当的理由;辩解的理由 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 devoted | |
adj.忠诚的,忠实的,热心的,献身于...的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |