Idealism is only considering everything in its practical essence. Idealism only means that we should consider a poker15 in reference to poking16 before we discuss its suitability for wife-beating; that we should ask if an egg is good enough for practical poultry-rearing before we decide that the egg is bad enough for practical politics. But I know that this primary pursuit of the theory (which is but pursuit of the aim) exposes one to the cheap charge of fiddling17 while Rome is burning. A school, of which Lord Rosebery is representative, has endeavored to substitute for the moral or social ideals which have hitherto been the motive18 of politics a general coherency or completeness in the social system which has gained the nick-name of “efficiency.” I am not very certain of the secret doctrine19 of this sect20 in the matter. But, as far as I can make out, “efficiency” means that we ought to discover everything about a machine except what it is for. There has arisen in our time a most singular fancy: the fancy that when things go very wrong we need a practical man. It would be far truer to say, that when things go very wrong we need an unpractical man. Certainly, at least, we need a theorist. A practical man means a man accustomed to mere daily practice, to the way things commonly work. When things will not work, you must have the thinker, the man who has some doctrine about why they work at all. It is wrong to fiddle21 while Rome is burning; but it is quite right to study the theory of hydraulics while Rome is burning.
It is then necessary to drop one’s daily agnosticism and attempt rerum cognoscere causas. If your aeroplane has a slight indisposition, a handy man may mend it. But, if it is seriously ill, it is all the more likely that some absent-minded old professor with wild white hair will have to be dragged out of a college or laboratory to analyze22 the evil. The more complicated the smash, the whiter-haired and more absent-minded will be the theorist who is needed to deal with it; and in some extreme cases, no one but the man (probably insane) who invented your flying-ship could possibly say what was the matter with it.
“Efficiency,” of course, is futile for the same reason that strong men, will-power and the superman are futile. That is, it is futile because it only deals with actions after they have been performed. It has no philosophy for incidents before they happen; therefore it has no power of choice. An act can only be successful or unsuccessful when it is over; if it is to begin, it must be, in the abstract, right or wrong. There is no such thing as backing a winner; for he cannot be a winner when he is backed. There is no such thing as fighting on the winning side; one fights to find out which is the winning side. If any operation has occurred, that operation was efficient. If a man is murdered, the murder was efficient. A tropical sun is as efficient in making people lazy as a Lancashire foreman bully23 in making them energetic. Maeterlinck is as efficient in filling a man with strange spiritual tremors24 as Messrs. Crosse and Blackwell are in filling a man with jam. But it all depends on what you want to be filled with. Lord Rosebery, being a modern skeptic25, probably prefers the spiritual tremors. I, being an orthodox Christian26, prefer the jam. But both are efficient when they have been effected; and inefficient27 until they are effected. A man who thinks much about success must be the drowsiest28 sentimentalist; for he must be always looking back. If he only likes victory he must always come late for the battle. For the man of action there is nothing but idealism.
This definite ideal is a far more urgent and practical matter in our existing English trouble than any immediate29 plans or proposals. For the present chaos30 is due to a sort of general oblivion of all that men were originally aiming at. No man demands what he desires; each man demands what he fancies he can get. Soon people forget what the man really wanted first; and after a successful and vigorous political life, he forgets it himself. The whole is an extravagant31 riot of second bests, a pandemonium32 of pis-aller. Now this sort of pliability33 does not merely prevent any heroic consistency34, it also prevents any really practical compromise. One can only find the middle distance between two points if the two points will stand still. We may make an arrangement between two litigants35 who cannot both get what they want; but not if they will not even tell us what they want. The keeper of a restaurant would much prefer that each customer should give his order smartly, though it were for stewed36 ibis or boiled elephant, rather than that each customer should sit holding his head in his hands, plunged37 in arithmetical calculations about how much food there can be on the premises38. Most of us have suffered from a certain sort of ladies who, by their perverse39 unselfishness, give more trouble than the selfish; who almost clamor for the unpopular dish and scramble40 for the worst seat. Most of us have known parties or expeditions full of this seething41 fuss of self-effacement. From much meaner motives42 than those of such admirable women, our practical politicians keep things in the same confusion through the same doubt about their real demands. There is nothing that so much prevents a settlement as a tangle43 of small surrenders. We are bewildered on every side by politicians who are in favor of secular44 education, but think it hopeless to work for it; who desire total prohibition45, but are certain they should not demand it; who regret compulsory46 education, but resignedly continue it; or who want peasant proprietorship47 and therefore vote for something else. It is this dazed and floundering opportunism that gets in the way of everything. If our statesmen were visionaries something practical might be done. If we ask for something in the abstract we might get something in the concrete. As it is, it is not only impossible to get what one wants, but it is impossible to get any part of it, because nobody can mark it out plainly like a map. That clear and even hard quality that there was in the old bargaining has wholly vanished. We forget that the word “compromise” contains, among other things, the rigid48 and ringing word “promise.” Moderation is not vague; it is as definite as perfection. The middle point is as fixed49 as the extreme point.
If I am made to walk the plank50 by a pirate, it is vain for me to offer, as a common-sense compromise, to walk along the plank for a reasonable distance. It is exactly about the reasonable distance that the pirate and I differ. There is an exquisite51 mathematical split second at which the plank tips up. My common-sense ends just before that instant; the pirate’s common-sense begins just beyond it. But the point itself is as hard as any geometrical diagram; as abstract as any theological dogma.
点击收听单词发音
1 philosophical | |
adj.哲学家的,哲学上的,达观的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 futile | |
adj.无效的,无用的,无希望的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 inquiry | |
n.打听,询问,调查,查问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 frivolous | |
adj.轻薄的;轻率的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 felicitous | |
adj.恰当的,巧妙的;n.恰当,贴切 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 evolutionary | |
adj.进化的;演化的,演变的;[生]进化论的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 monstrous | |
adj.巨大的;恐怖的;可耻的,丢脸的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 recurring | |
adj.往复的,再次发生的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 mere | |
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 dart | |
v.猛冲,投掷;n.飞镖,猛冲 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 complexities | |
复杂性(complexity的名词复数); 复杂的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 embryo | |
n.胚胎,萌芽的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 morbid | |
adj.病的;致病的;病态的;可怕的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 poker | |
n.扑克;vt.烙制 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 poking | |
n. 刺,戳,袋 vt. 拨开,刺,戳 vi. 戳,刺,捅,搜索,伸出,行动散慢 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 fiddling | |
微小的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 motive | |
n.动机,目的;adv.发动的,运动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 doctrine | |
n.教义;主义;学说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 sect | |
n.派别,宗教,学派,派系 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 fiddle | |
n.小提琴;vi.拉提琴;不停拨弄,乱动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 analyze | |
vt.分析,解析 (=analyse) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 bully | |
n.恃强欺弱者,小流氓;vt.威胁,欺侮 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 tremors | |
震颤( tremor的名词复数 ); 战栗; 震颤声; 大地的轻微震动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 skeptic | |
n.怀疑者,怀疑论者,无神论者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 Christian | |
adj.基督教徒的;n.基督教徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 inefficient | |
adj.效率低的,无效的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 drowsiest | |
adj.欲睡的,半睡的,使人昏昏欲睡的( drowsy的最高级 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 immediate | |
adj.立即的;直接的,最接近的;紧靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 chaos | |
n.混乱,无秩序 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 extravagant | |
adj.奢侈的;过分的;(言行等)放肆的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 pandemonium | |
n.喧嚣,大混乱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 pliability | |
n.柔韧性;可弯性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 consistency | |
n.一贯性,前后一致,稳定性;(液体的)浓度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 litigants | |
n.诉讼当事人( litigant的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 stewed | |
adj.焦虑不安的,烂醉的v.炖( stew的过去式和过去分词 );煨;思考;担忧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 plunged | |
v.颠簸( plunge的过去式和过去分词 );暴跌;骤降;突降 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 premises | |
n.建筑物,房屋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 perverse | |
adj.刚愎的;坚持错误的,行为反常的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 scramble | |
v.爬行,攀爬,杂乱蔓延,碎片,片段,废料 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 seething | |
沸腾的,火热的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 motives | |
n.动机,目的( motive的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 tangle | |
n.纠缠;缠结;混乱;v.(使)缠绕;变乱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 secular | |
n.牧师,凡人;adj.世俗的,现世的,不朽的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 prohibition | |
n.禁止;禁令,禁律 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 compulsory | |
n.强制的,必修的;规定的,义务的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 proprietorship | |
n.所有(权);所有权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 rigid | |
adj.严格的,死板的;刚硬的,僵硬的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 fixed | |
adj.固定的,不变的,准备好的;(计算机)固定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 plank | |
n.板条,木板,政策要点,政纲条目 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 exquisite | |
adj.精美的;敏锐的;剧烈的,感觉强烈的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |