But in the modern world we are primarily confronted with the extraordinary spectacle of people turning to new ideals because they have not tried the old. Men have not got tired of Christianity; they have never found enough Christianity to get tired of. Men have never wearied of political justice; they have wearied of waiting for it.
Now, for the purpose of this book, I propose to take only one of these old ideals; but one that is perhaps the oldest. I take the principle of domesticity: the ideal house; the happy family, the holy family of history. For the moment it is only necessary to remark that it is like the church and like the republic, now chiefly assailed11 by those who have never known it, or by those who have failed to fulfil it. Numberless modern women have rebelled against domesticity in theory because they have never known it in practice. Hosts of the poor are driven to the workhouse without ever having known the house. Generally speaking, the cultured class is shrieking12 to be let out of the decent home, just as the working class is shouting to be let into it.
Now if we take this house or home as a test, we may very generally lay the simple spiritual foundations of the idea. God is that which can make something out of nothing. Man (it may truly be said) is that which can make something out of anything. In other words, while the joy of God be unlimited13 creation, the special joy of man is limited creation, the combination of creation with limits. Man’s pleasure, therefore, is to possess conditions, but also to be partly possessed14 by them; to be half-controlled by the flute15 he plays or by the field he digs. The excitement is to get the utmost out of given conditions; the conditions will stretch, but not indefinitely. A man can write an immortal16 sonnet17 on an old envelope, or hack18 a hero out of a lump of rock. But hacking19 a sonnet out of a rock would be a laborious20 business, and making a hero out of an envelope is almost out of the sphere of practical politics. This fruitful strife21 with limitations, when it concerns some airy entertainment of an educated class, goes by the name of Art. But the mass of men have neither time nor aptitude22 for the invention of invisible or abstract beauty. For the mass of men the idea of artistic23 creation can only be expressed by an idea unpopular in present discussions—the idea of property. The average man cannot cut clay into the shape of a man; but he can cut earth into the shape of a garden; and though he arranges it with red geraniums and blue potatoes in alternate straight lines, he is still an artist; because he has chosen. The average man cannot paint the sunset whose colors be admires; but he can paint his own house with what color he chooses, and though he paints it pea green with pink spots, he is still an artist; because that is his choice. Property is merely the art of the democracy. It means that every man should have something that he can shape in his own image, as he is shaped in the image of heaven. But because he is not God, but only a graven image of God, his self-expression must deal with limits; properly with limits that are strict and even small.
I am well aware that the word “property” has been defied in our time by the corruption24 of the great capitalists. One would think, to hear people talk, that the Rothchilds and the Rockefellers were on the side of property. But obviously they are the enemies of property; because they are enemies of their own limitations. They do not want their own land; but other people’s. When they remove their neighbor’s landmark25, they also remove their own. A man who loves a little triangular26 field ought to love it because it is triangular; anyone who destroys the shape, by giving him more land, is a thief who has stolen a triangle. A man with the true poetry of possession wishes to see the wall where his garden meets Smith’s garden; the hedge where his farm touches Brown’s. He cannot see the shape of his own land unless he sees the edges of his neighbor’s. It is the negation27 of property that the Duke of Sutherland should have all the farms in one estate; just as it would be the negation of marriage if he had all our wives in one harem.
点击收听单词发音
1 propound | |
v.提出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 propounding | |
v.提出(问题、计划等)供考虑[讨论],提议( propound的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 maxim | |
n.格言,箴言 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 frightful | |
adj.可怕的;讨厌的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 stunning | |
adj.极好的;使人晕倒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 virgin | |
n.处女,未婚女子;adj.未经使用的;未经开发的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 martyrs | |
n.martyr的复数形式;烈士( martyr的名词复数 );殉道者;殉教者;乞怜者(向人诉苦以博取同情) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 defiantly | |
adv.挑战地,大胆对抗地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 horrified | |
a.(表现出)恐惧的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 miraculous | |
adj.像奇迹一样的,不可思议的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 assailed | |
v.攻击( assail的过去式和过去分词 );困扰;质问;毅然应对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 shrieking | |
v.尖叫( shriek的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 unlimited | |
adj.无限的,不受控制的,无条件的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 possessed | |
adj.疯狂的;拥有的,占有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 flute | |
n.长笛;v.吹笛 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 immortal | |
adj.不朽的;永生的,不死的;神的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 sonnet | |
n.十四行诗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 hack | |
n.劈,砍,出租马车;v.劈,砍,干咳 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 hacking | |
n.非法访问计算机系统和数据库的活动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 laborious | |
adj.吃力的,努力的,不流畅 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 strife | |
n.争吵,冲突,倾轧,竞争 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 aptitude | |
n.(学习方面的)才能,资质,天资 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 artistic | |
adj.艺术(家)的,美术(家)的;善于艺术创作的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 corruption | |
n.腐败,堕落,贪污 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 landmark | |
n.陆标,划时代的事,地界标 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 triangular | |
adj.三角(形)的,三者间的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 negation | |
n.否定;否认 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |