I have called this book of Mr. Quick the most valuable history of education in our mother-tongue, fit only to be compared with Karl von Raumer’s Geschichte der P?dagogik for its presentation of essentials and for the sanity6 of its verdicts.
[viii]
I made my proposal that he “rewrite” his book because I knew that he considered his first edition hastily written and, in many respects, not adequate to the ideal he had conceived of the book. I knew, moreover, that years of continued thinking on a theme necessarily modifies one’s views. He would wish to make some changes in matter presented, some in judgments8 rendered, and many more in style of presentation.
Hence it has come about that after this lapse9 of time Mr. Quick has produced a substantially new book, which, retaining all or nearly all of the admirable features of the first edition, has brought up to their standard of excellence10 many others.
The history of education is a vast field, and we are accustomed to demand bulky treatises11 as the only adequate ones. But the obvious disadvantage of such works has led to the clearly defined ideal of a book like Mr. Quick’s, which separates the gold from the dross12, and offers it small in bulk but precious in value.
The educational reformers are the men above all others who stimulate13 us to think about education. Every one of these was an extremist, and erred14 in his judgment7 as to the value of the methods which prevailed in his time, and also overestimated15 the effects of the new education that he proposed in the place of the old. But thought begins with negations, and originality16 shows itself first not in creating something new, but in removing the fettering17 limitations of its existing environment. The old is attacked—its good and its bad are condemned19 alike. It has been imposed on us by authority, and we have not been allowed to summon it before the bar of our reason and ask of it its credentials20. It informs us that it presented these credentials ages ago to our ancestors—men[ix] older and wiser than we are. Such imposition of authority leaves us no choice but to revolt. We, too, have a right to think as well as our ancestors; we, too, must clear up the ground of our belief and substitute insight for blind faith in tradition.
These educational reformers are prophets of the clearing-up period (Aufkl?rung) of revolution against mere21 authority.
While we are inspired to think for ourselves, however, we must not neglect that more important matter of thinking the truth. Free-thinking, if it does not reach the truth, is not of great value. It sets itself as puny22 individual against the might of the race, which preserves its experience in the forms of institutions—the family, the social organism, the state, the Church.
Hence our wiser and more scientific method studies everything that is, or exists, in its history, and endeavors to discover how it came to be what it is. It inquires into its evolution. The essential truth is not the present fact, but the entire process by which the present fact grew to be what it is. For the living force that made the present fact made also the past facts antecedent to the present, and it will go on making subsequent facts. The revelation of the living forces which make the facts of existence is the object of science. It takes all these facts to reveal the living force that is acting23 and producing them.
Hence the scientific attitude is superior to the attitude of these educational reformers, and we shall in our own minds weigh these men in our scales, asking first of all: What is their view of the world? How much do they value human institutions? How much do they know of the substantial good that is wrought24 by those institutions? If they know nothing of these things, if they see only incumbrance[x] in these institutions, if to them the individual is the measure of all things, we can not do reverence25 to their proposed remedies, but must account their value to us chiefly this, that they have stimulated26 us to thinking, and helped us to discover what they have not discovered—namely, the positive value of institutions.
All education deals with the boundary between ignorance and knowledge and between bad habits and good ones. The pupil as pupil brings with him the ignorance and the bad habits, and is engaged in acquiring good habits and correct knowledge.
This situation gives us a general recipe for a frequently recurring27 type of educational reformer. Any would-be reformer may take his stand on the boundary mentioned, and, casting an angry look at the realm of ignorance and bad habit not yet conquered, condemn18 in wholesale28 terms the system of education that has not been efficient in removing this mental and moral darkness.
Such a reformer selects an examination paper written by a pupil whose ignorance is not yet vanquished29, and parades the same as a product of the work of the school, taking great pains to avoid an accurate and just admeasurement of the actual work done by the school. The reformer critic assumes that there is one factor here, whereas there are three factors—namely, (a) the pupil’s native and acquired powers of learning, (b) his actual knowledge acquired, and (c) the instruction given by the school. The school is not responsible for the first and second of these factors, but it is responsible only for what increment30 has grown under its tutelage. How much and what has the pupil increased his knowledge, and how much his power of acquiring knowledge and of doing?
The educational reformer is always telling us to leave[xi] words and take up things. He dissuades31 from the study of language, and also undervalues the knowledge of manners and customs and laws and usages. He dislikes the study of institutions even. He “loves Nature,” as he informs us. Herbert Spencer wants us to study the body, and to be more interested in biology than in formal logic32; more interested in natural history than in literature. But I think he would be indignant if one were to ask him whether he thought the study of the habits and social instincts of bees and ants is less important than the study of insect anatomy33 and physiology34. Anatomy and physiology are, of course, important, but the social organism is more important than the physiological35 organism, even in bees and ants.
So in man the social organism is transcendent as compared with human physiology, and social hygiene36 compared with physiological hygiene is supreme37.
To suppose that the habits of plants and insects are facts, and that the structure of human languages, the logical structure of the mind itself as revealed in the figures and modes of the syllogism38 and the manners and customs of social life, the deep ethical39 principles which govern peoples as revealed in works of literature—to suppose that these and the like of these are not real facts and worthy40 of study is one of the strangest delusions42 that has ever prevailed.
But it is a worse delusion41 to suppose that the study of Nature is more practical than the study of man, though this is often enough claimed by the educational reformers.
The knowledge of most worth is first and foremost the knowledge of how to behave—a knowledge of social customs and usages. Any person totally ignorant in this regard would not escape imprisonment—perhaps I should[xii] say decapitation—for one day in any city of the world—say in London, in Pekin, in Timbuctoo, or in a pueblo43 of Arizona. A knowledge of human customs and usages, next a knowledge of human views of Nature and man—these are of primordial44 necessity to an individual, and are means of direct self-preservation.
The old trivium or threefold course of study at the university taught grammar, logic, and rhetoric—namely, (1) the structure of language, (2) the structure of mind and the art of reasoning, (3) the principles and art of persuasion45. These may be seen at once to be lofty subjects and worthy objects of science. They will always remain such, but they are not easy for the child. In the course of mastering them he must learn to master himself and gain great intellectual stature46. Pedagogy has wisely graded the road to these heights, and placed much easier studies at the beginning and also made the studies more various. Improvements in methods and in grading—devices for interesting the pupil—so essential to his self-activity, for these we have to thank the Educational Reformers.
W. T. Harris.
Washington, D. C., 1890.
点击收听单词发音
1 noted | |
adj.著名的,知名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 tact | |
n.机敏,圆滑,得体 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 confidential | |
adj.秘(机)密的,表示信任的,担任机密工作的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 judicial | |
adj.司法的,法庭的,审判的,明断的,公正的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 radicalism | |
n. 急进主义, 根本的改革主义 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 sanity | |
n.心智健全,神智正常,判断正确 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 judgment | |
n.审判;判断力,识别力,看法,意见 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 judgments | |
判断( judgment的名词复数 ); 鉴定; 评价; 审判 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 lapse | |
n.过失,流逝,失效,抛弃信仰,间隔;vi.堕落,停止,失效,流逝;vt.使失效 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 excellence | |
n.优秀,杰出,(pl.)优点,美德 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 treatises | |
n.专题著作,专题论文,专著( treatise的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 dross | |
n.渣滓;无用之物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 stimulate | |
vt.刺激,使兴奋;激励,使…振奋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 erred | |
犯错误,做错事( err的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 overestimated | |
对(数量)估计过高,对…作过高的评价( overestimate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 originality | |
n.创造力,独创性;新颖 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 fettering | |
v.给…上脚镣,束缚( fetter的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 condemn | |
vt.谴责,指责;宣判(罪犯),判刑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 condemned | |
adj. 被责难的, 被宣告有罪的 动词condemn的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 credentials | |
n.证明,资格,证明书,证件 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 mere | |
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 puny | |
adj.微不足道的,弱小的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 acting | |
n.演戏,行为,假装;adj.代理的,临时的,演出用的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 wrought | |
v.引起;以…原料制作;运转;adj.制造的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 reverence | |
n.敬畏,尊敬,尊严;Reverence:对某些基督教神职人员的尊称;v.尊敬,敬畏,崇敬 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 stimulated | |
a.刺激的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 recurring | |
adj.往复的,再次发生的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 wholesale | |
n.批发;adv.以批发方式;vt.批发,成批出售 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 vanquished | |
v.征服( vanquish的过去式和过去分词 );战胜;克服;抑制 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 increment | |
n.增值,增价;提薪,增加工资 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 dissuades | |
劝(某人)勿做某事,劝阻( dissuade的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 logic | |
n.逻辑(学);逻辑性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 anatomy | |
n.解剖学,解剖;功能,结构,组织 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 physiology | |
n.生理学,生理机能 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 physiological | |
adj.生理学的,生理学上的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 hygiene | |
n.健康法,卫生学 (a.hygienic) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 syllogism | |
n.演绎法,三段论法 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 ethical | |
adj.伦理的,道德的,合乎道德的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 worthy | |
adj.(of)值得的,配得上的;有价值的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 delusion | |
n.谬见,欺骗,幻觉,迷惑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 delusions | |
n.欺骗( delusion的名词复数 );谬见;错觉;妄想 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 pueblo | |
n.(美国西南部或墨西哥等)印第安人的村庄 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 primordial | |
adj.原始的;最初的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 persuasion | |
n.劝说;说服;持有某种信仰的宗派 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 stature | |
n.(高度)水平,(高度)境界,身高,身材 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |