If K is a Galileian co-ordinate system. then every other co-ordinate system K′ is a Galileian one, when, in relation to K, it is in a condition of uniform motion of translation. Relative to K′ the mechanical laws of Galilei-Newton hold good exactly as they do with respect to K.
We advance a step farther in our generalisation when we express the tenet thus: If, relative to K, K′ is a uniformly moving co-ordinate system devoid4 of rotation5, then natural phenomena6 run their course with respect to K′ according to exactly the same general laws as with respect to K. This statement is called the principle of relativity (in the restricted sense).
As long as one was convinced that all natural phenomena were capable of representation with the help of classical mechanics, there was no need to doubt the validity of this principle of relativity. But in view of the more recent development of electrodynamics and optics it became more and more evident that classical mechanics affords an insufficient8 foundation for the physical description of all natural phenomena. At this juncture9 the question of the validity of the principle of relativity became ripe for discussion, and it did not appear impossible that the answer to this question might be in the negative.
Nevertheless, there are two general facts which at the outset speak very much in favour of the validity of the principle of relativity. Even though classical mechanics does not supply us with a sufficiently10 broad basis for the theoretical presentation of all physical phenomena, still we must grant it a considerable measure of “truth,” since it supplies us with the actual motions of the heavenly bodies with a delicacy11 of detail little short of wonderful. The principle of relativity must therefore apply with great accuracy in the domain12 of mechanics. But that a principle of such broad generality should hold with such exactness in one domain of phenomena, and yet should be invalid13 for another, is a priori not very probable.
We now proceed to the second argument, to which, moreover, we shall return later. If the principle of relativity (in the restricted sense) does not hold, then the Galileian co-ordinate systems K, K′, K″, etc., which are moving uniformly relative to each other, will not be equivalent for the description of natural phenomena. In this case we should be constrained14 to believe that natural laws are capable of being formulated15 in a particularly simple manner, and of course only on condition that, from amongst all possible Galileian co-ordinate systems, we should have chosen one (upper K 0) of a particular state of motion as our body of reference. We should then be justified16 (because of its merits for the description of natural phenomena) in calling this system “absolutely at rest,” and all other Galileian systems K “in motion.” If, for instance, our embankment were the system upper K 0 then our railway carriage would be a system K, relative to which less simple laws would hold than with respect to upper K 0. This diminished simplicity17 would be due to the fact that the carriage K would be in motion (i.e. “really”) with respect to upper K 0. In the general laws of nature which have been formulated with reference to K, the magnitude and direction of the velocity of the carriage would necessarily play a part. We should expect, for instance, that the note emitted by an organpipe placed with its axis18 parallel to the direction of travel would be different from that emitted if the axis of the pipe were placed perpendicular19 to this direction.
Now in virtue20 of its motion in an orbit round the sun, our earth is comparable with a railway carriage travelling with a velocity of about 30 kilometres per second. If the principle of relativity were not valid7 we should therefore expect that the direction of motion of the earth at any moment would enter into the laws of nature, and also that physical systems in their behaviour would be dependent on the orientation21 in space with respect to the earth. For owing to the alteration22 in direction of the velocity of revolution of the earth in the course of a year, the earth cannot be at rest relative to the hypothetical system upper K 0 throughout the whole year. However, the most careful observations have never revealed such anisotropic properties in terrestrial physical space, i.e. a physical non-equivalence of different directions. This is very powerful argument in favour of the principle of relativity.
点击收听单词发音
1 attain | |
vt.达到,获得,完成 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 velocity | |
n.速度,速率 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 raven | |
n.渡鸟,乌鸦;adj.乌亮的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 devoid | |
adj.全无的,缺乏的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 rotation | |
n.旋转;循环,轮流 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 phenomena | |
n.现象 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 valid | |
adj.有确实根据的;有效的;正当的,合法的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 insufficient | |
adj.(for,of)不足的,不够的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 juncture | |
n.时刻,关键时刻,紧要关头 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 sufficiently | |
adv.足够地,充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 delicacy | |
n.精致,细微,微妙,精良;美味,佳肴 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 domain | |
n.(活动等)领域,范围;领地,势力范围 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 invalid | |
n.病人,伤残人;adj.有病的,伤残的;无效的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 constrained | |
adj.束缚的,节制的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 formulated | |
v.构想出( formulate的过去式和过去分词 );规划;确切地阐述;用公式表示 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 justified | |
a.正当的,有理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 simplicity | |
n.简单,简易;朴素;直率,单纯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 axis | |
n.轴,轴线,中心线;坐标轴,基准线 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 perpendicular | |
adj.垂直的,直立的;n.垂直线,垂直的位置 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 virtue | |
n.德行,美德;贞操;优点;功效,效力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 orientation | |
n.方向,目标;熟悉,适应,情况介绍 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 alteration | |
n.变更,改变;蚀变 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |