There is hardly a simpler law in physics than that according to which light is propagated in empty space. Every child at school knows, or believes he knows, that this propagation takes place in straight lines with a velocity2 c equals 300 comma 000 km./sec. At all events we know with great exactness that this velocity is the same for all colours, because if this were not the case, the minimum of emission3 would not be observed simultaneously4 for different colours during the eclipse of a fixed5 star by its dark neighbour. By means of similar considerations based on observations of double stars, the Dutch astronomer6 De Sitter was also able to show that the velocity of propagation of light cannot depend on the velocity of motion of the body emitting the light. The assumption that this velocity of propagation is dependent on the direction “in space” is in itself improbable.
In short, let us assume that the simple law of the constancy of the velocity of light c (in vacuum) is justifiably7 believed by the child at school. Who would imagine that this simple law has plunged8 the conscientiously9 thoughtful physicist10 into the greatest intellectual difficulties? Let us consider how these difficulties arise.
Of course we must refer the process of the propagation of light (and indeed every other process) to a rigid11 reference-body (co-ordinate system). As such a system let us again choose our embankment. We shall imagine the air above it to have been removed. If a ray of light be sent along the embankment, we see from the above that the tip of the ray will be transmitted with the velocity c relative to the embankment. Now let us suppose that our railway carriage is again travelling along the railway lines with the velocity v, and that its direction is the same as that of the ray of light, but its velocity of course much less. Let us inquire about the velocity of propagation of the ray of light relative to the carriage. It is obvious that we can here apply the consideration of the previous section, since the ray of light plays the part of the man walking along relatively12 to the carriage. The velocity W of the man relative to the embankment is here replaced by the velocity of light relative to the embankment. w is the required velocity of light with respect to the carriage, and we have
w equals c minus v period
The velocity of propagation of a ray of light relative to the carriage thus comes cut smaller than c.
But this result comes into conflict with the principle of relativity set forth13 in Section V. For, like every other general law of nature, the law of the transmission of light in vacuo [in vacuum] must, according to the principle of relativity, be the same for the railway carriage as reference-body as when the rails are the body of reference. But, from our above consideration, this would appear to be impossible. If every ray of light is propagated relative to the embankment with the velocity c, then for this reason it would appear that another law of propagation of light must necessarily hold with respect to the carriage—a result contradictory14 to the principle of relativity.
In view of this dilemma15 there appears to be nothing else for it than to abandon either the principle of relativity or the simple law of the propagation of light in vacuo. Those of you who have carefully followed the preceding discussion are almost sure to expect that we should retain the principle of relativity, which appeals so convincingly to the intellect because it is so natural and simple. The law of the propagation of light in vacuo would then have to be replaced by a more complicated law conformable to the principle of relativity. The development of theoretical physics shows, however, that we cannot pursue this course. The epoch-making theoretical investigations16 of H. A. Lorentz on the electrodynamical and optical phenomena17 connected with moving bodies show that experience in this domain18 leads conclusively19 to a theory of electromagnetic phenomena, of which the law of the constancy of the velocity of light in vacuo is a necessary consequence. Prominent theoretical physicists20 were therefore more inclined to reject the principle of relativity, in spite of the fact that no empirical data had been found which were contradictory to this principle.
At this juncture21 the theory of relativity entered the arena22. As a result of an analysis of the physical conceptions of time and space, it became evident that in reality there is not the least incompatibility between the principle of relativity and the law of propagation of light, and that by systematically23 holding fast to both these laws a logically rigid theory could be arrived at. This theory has been called the special theory of relativity to distinguish it from the extended theory, with which we shall deal later. In the following pages we shall present the fundamental ideas of the special theory of relativity.
点击收听单词发音
1 incompatibility | |
n.不兼容 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 velocity | |
n.速度,速率 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 emission | |
n.发出物,散发物;发出,散发 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 simultaneously | |
adv.同时发生地,同时进行地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 fixed | |
adj.固定的,不变的,准备好的;(计算机)固定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 astronomer | |
n.天文学家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 justifiably | |
adv.无可非议地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 plunged | |
v.颠簸( plunge的过去式和过去分词 );暴跌;骤降;突降 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 conscientiously | |
adv.凭良心地;认真地,负责尽职地;老老实实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 physicist | |
n.物理学家,研究物理学的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 rigid | |
adj.严格的,死板的;刚硬的,僵硬的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 relatively | |
adv.比较...地,相对地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 forth | |
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 contradictory | |
adj.反驳的,反对的,抗辩的;n.正反对,矛盾对立 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 dilemma | |
n.困境,进退两难的局面 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 investigations | |
(正式的)调查( investigation的名词复数 ); 侦查; 科学研究; 学术研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 phenomena | |
n.现象 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 domain | |
n.(活动等)领域,范围;领地,势力范围 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 conclusively | |
adv.令人信服地,确凿地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 physicists | |
物理学家( physicist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 juncture | |
n.时刻,关键时刻,紧要关头 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 arena | |
n.竞技场,运动场所;竞争场所,舞台 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 systematically | |
adv.有系统地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |