The question is often asked how individuals, having no right to dispose of their own lives, can transfer to the Sovereign a right which they do not possess. The difficulty of answering this question seems to me to lie in its being wrongly stated. Every man has a right to risk his own life in order to preserve it. Has it ever, been said that a man who throws himself out of the window to escape from a fire is guilty of suicide? Has such a crime ever been laid to the charge of him who perishes in a storm because, when he went on board, he knew of the danger?
The social treaty has for its end the preservation1 of the contracting parties. He who wills the end wills the means also, and the means must involve some risks, and even some losses. He who wishes to preserve his life at others expense should also, when it is necessary, be ready to give it up for their sake. Furthermore, the citizen is no longer the judge of the dangers to which the law desires him to expose himself; and when the prince says to him: "It is expedient2 for the State that you should die," he ought to die, because it is only on that condition that he has been living in security up to the present, and because his life is no longer a mere3 bounty4 of nature, but a gift made conditionally5 by the State.
The death-penalty inflicted6 upon criminals may be looked on in much the same light: it is in order that we may not fall victims to an assassin that we consent to die if we ourselves turn assassins. In this treaty, so far from disposing of our own lives, we think only of securing them, and it is not to be assumed that any of the parties then expects to get hanged.
Again, every malefactor7, by attacking social rights, becomes on forfeit8 a rebel and a traitor9 to his country; by violating its laws he ceases to be a member of it; he even makes war upon it. In such a case the preservation of the State is inconsistent with his own, and one or the other must perish; in putting the guilty to death, we slay10 not so much the citizen as an enemy. The trial and the judgment11 are the proofs that he has broken the social treaty, and is in consequence no longer a member of the State. Since, then, he has recognised himself to be such by living there, he must be removed by exile as a violator of the compact, or by death as a public enemy; for such an enemy is not a moral person, but merely a man; and in such a case the right of war is to kill the vanquished12.
But, it will be said, the condemnation13 of a criminal is a particular act. I admit it: but such condemnation is not a function of the Sovereign; it is a right the Sovereign can confer without being able itself to exert it. All my ideas are consistent, but I cannot expound14 them all at once.
We may add that frequent punishments are always a sign of weakness or remissness15 on the part of the government. There is not a single ill-doer who could not be turned to some good. The State has no right to put to death, even for the sake of making an example, any one whom it can leave alive without danger.
The right of pardoning or exempting16 the guilty from a penalty imposed by the law and pronounced by the judge belongs only to the authority which is superior to both judge and law, i.e. the Sovereign; even its right in this matter is far from clear, and the cases for exercising it are extremely rare. In a well-governed State, there are few punishments, not because there are many pardons, but because criminals are rare; it is when a State is in decay that the multitude of crimes is a guarantee of impunity17. Under the Roman Republic, neither the Senate nor the Consuls18 ever attempted to pardon; even the people never did so, though it sometimes revoked19 its own decision. Frequent pardons mean that crime will soon need them no longer, and no-one can help seeing whither that leads. But I feel my heart protesting and restraining my pen; let us leave these questions to the just man who has never offended, and would himself stand in no need of pardon.
点击收听单词发音
1 preservation | |
n.保护,维护,保存,保留,保持 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 expedient | |
adj.有用的,有利的;n.紧急的办法,权宜之计 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 mere | |
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 bounty | |
n.慷慨的赠予物,奖金;慷慨,大方;施与 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 conditionally | |
adv. 有条件地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 inflicted | |
把…强加给,使承受,遭受( inflict的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 malefactor | |
n.罪犯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 forfeit | |
vt.丧失;n.罚金,罚款,没收物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 traitor | |
n.叛徒,卖国贼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 slay | |
v.杀死,宰杀,杀戮 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 judgment | |
n.审判;判断力,识别力,看法,意见 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 vanquished | |
v.征服( vanquish的过去式和过去分词 );战胜;克服;抑制 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 condemnation | |
n.谴责; 定罪 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 expound | |
v.详述;解释;阐述 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 remissness | |
n.玩忽职守;马虎;怠慢;不小心 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 exempting | |
使免除[豁免]( exempt的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 impunity | |
n.(惩罚、损失、伤害等的)免除 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 consuls | |
领事( consul的名词复数 ); (古罗马共和国时期)执政官 (古罗马共和国及其军队的最高首长,同时共有两位,每年选举一次) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 revoked | |
adj.[法]取消的v.撤销,取消,废除( revoke的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |