I have always had a horror of war. I hoped and thought up to the last moment that it would be averted2. It seemed impossible that France and Germany could come to blows; the cost looked to be too big. Yet I see the Kaiser swept away by the war party behind him, urged by that mysticism, which always characterised him, to believe that war was a divine duty. This is the only reason I can find for his declaration. He loved to preach and pray and live and talk among the stars. The impulse of religious fervour ran riot in him, and he persuaded himself that to plunge3 the world into the most horrible war of all time was his divine mission.
The horror of war which we feel was naturally{243} enough not shared by the Kaiser and the war party in Berlin. They had grown used to the idea, for years it had been among their ambitions, and many of them had spent all their lives training for it. In fact, that is the biggest and most tragic4 mistake of modern history—Germany’s conception that to conquer the rest of Europe was her divinely appointed mission; you can see it in every bellicose5 utterance6 of the Kaiser! This was never a mere7 pose. He was in his private life exactly the same man as in his public utterances8.
What is to be the result of this war? The setbacks are obvious. It will take Great Britain, with all the wealth and resources of her Empire, a dozen years to recover from the exhaustion9 of it. France, with large stretches of her country desolated10, and crippled financially, will perhaps take longer. Russia will feel it less in many ways, and certainly will reap one big benefit in that the war will, I do not doubt, help to cement her scattered11 and immense population and bring in a new era of unity12.
It may well be, indeed, that the end of the war will see a Russia reborn, rid of her antiquated13 systems of local government, released from methods{244} which were medi?val—a country set upon a definite road to freedom.
I do not mean that a Russian republic is a likely result. I think the war will strengthen the monarchy14; a successful war always does.
Why, even in France to-day there is a widespread feeling that a return to monarchy would be welcome. Personally, however, I do not believe the monarchical15 party will gain much headway; the whole tendency of the world is against it.
The spirit of the times is democratic. When a people realises that kings and queens are in no way superior mortals it gradually brings about a republic. This is the only natural and logical conclusion of things. France has learned this lesson well enough, she will never go back from her present methods of government—methods which have developed the natural genius and intelligence of her people and brought such prosperity that she has become one of the wealthiest countries in the world. The aristocracy of France has not sufficient power to overthrow16 the people, especially now when the people have been fighting with true patriotism17, not for the ideal{245} of a kingship, but for the ideal of a country—confraternity.
This spirit of democracy, I think, will extend all over Europe. Republics will arise, not by force of arms, mutinies or revolutions, but by natural evolution. To kill a king does not make a republic; that comes from the natural growth of ideas and ideals, from the development of the democratic spirit, the spirit of freedom, which follows in the wake of liberal education.
One effect of the war, then, may be to substantiate18 monarchy for the time being, save in France, where I think it will create a bigger confidence in the Republic. In other words, if the Allies emerge with considerable success, conditions of government as they are will be strengthened, particularly in Russia.
A great deal has been written in the past about the tottering20 power of the monarchy in Russia. All of this has been mostly untrue, and certainly misleading. I can recall statements in print of the fear of the Tsar to appear before his people. This is not the truth. When I was in Petrograd he often came to visit me practically unattended, and whenever he{246} has been counselled to take precaution he has adopted such measures only because he has thought it best for his country. He loves Russia; how much has been splendidly evident since the war broke out, and when all is over one effect will surely be that he will be all the more beloved by Russia. I see, too, as a result of his generous attitude the possibility of a resurrected Poland, whose populace will freely give suzerainty to Nicholas II. because they recognise amid all the riot and disaster of to-day that he is their friend.
Exaggerated statements have also been made that the Tsaritza fears assassination21. The writers have based their reports no doubt on the fact that the Tsar’s grandfather met his death in this way, and they have no doubt assumed the fears of the present monarchs22 as a matter of course. The Empress is said visibly to tremble in public, but this is occasioned simply because she is unhappily a sufferer from timidity!
But more interesting than these things is the question of armament—or rather disarmament. Is the{247} latter possible? Arbitration25 in council instead of the sword and the gun—shall we, any of us, live to see that dream come true? Democracy, and a world-wide development of a Hague Conference of the Powers—these are the hopes of those who think. Is it too near the Utopia of the Romanticists? Is it the impossible Millennium26?
I do most honestly believe this will be the last big war; it will be a lesson to the wide world of the cost of fighting, the cost in lives, in comforts, in money. The English will surely feel this; they are fond of luxury. When I visited England I was impressed by the almost reckless extravagance of living; money did not count so long as entertainment was obtained; women seemed to have a careless disregard of all things save pleasure. I have wondered and marvelled27 at the way they have acted since war broke out; now no sacrifice is too great for them to make. Truly the English are remarkable28; they are on the surface lovers of ease and lazy luxury, so as to seem almost degenerate29. Yet, beneath it all, there is stamina30, grit31, the power to bear hardship, the spirit of the real adventurer. The war will do English social life good—for a time; but though for a little{248} while the English will eschew32 gaiety perhaps—I mean the recklessly extravagant33 gaieties which were their wont—will their phlegmatic34 nature presently allow this disturbance35 to be forgotten and the old conditions to recur36?
Sincerely I hope not. To end some of the senseless dissipations would be one of the best results of the war; there is no room in life for stupid extravagances, for heedless rushing after novel excitement. For English Society I hope the lesson will go too deep to be forgotten lightly. And I am interested too in the movement which is just now on foot in England to prohibit, or at least to curtail37 so extensive a sale of alcohol. An abstemious38 Europe would have made the war almost worth while. And why should it be impossible? France has closed down the sale of absinthe, Russia sells and consumes no more vodka. In England the evil is whisky.
But the question of disarmament: there is so much to hinder it. Each country has a different condition of things to consider; England, for instance, has never kept her army for her own insular39 needs; her army has been maintained to protect and uphold the ends of her Empire—and those needs will remain;{249} how can she disarm24 altogether when India has to be considered, and while she has interests to defend, not against the great Powers, but against the native insurgent40 in so many parts of the world, it is vital to her—and the present crisis emphasises it beyond mistake—that the seas should be kept open, and were there no force behind that need she as well as her food supply would be at the mercy of any pirate. Similarly France has colonies which call for a guard by land and sea.
But the day of the big military power will surely pass with the defeat of Prussian militarism, and the nations should see to it that never again shall one country deliberately41 arm herself so as to be a menace to the world’s peace. Is it not possible that the great nations should have an amalgamated42 navy and army powerful enough to command peace from insurgents—to be a sort of world-wide police? Surely at some conference of the Powers a decision should be arrived at by which the boundaries and influence of nations could be fixed43 for all time, with due regard to the scope required for the natural development of the ambitions of each.
It is certain that there is enough territory in the{250} world for the peoples of the earth; it is equally certain that the laws of supply and demand would balance and leave a reasonable living for all the people of the world if only economic conditions could be properly adjusted. I fancy that here lie the big problems of the future—not the conquering of one another by the force of sword and gun, but the equalisation of the possibilities of possession. There are too many men with big fortunes and too many homes with not sufficient income; on the face of it there should be a way to balance these discrepancies44, and there the big thinkers and the students of political economy will step in. The ultimate destiny of the world, when this terrible war is over and done with, will rest upon the shoulders of those thinkers and economists45, and upon the success of their efforts will depend the peace and happiness of our children’s children.
I know that here I am laying down the ethics46 of Socialism, but not the Socialism that depends upon labour upheavals47 in which the worker merely seeks to get all he can from the employer, but that larger Socialism whose aim is the good of the community{251} as opposed to the fortune of the individual in the pursuit of the general well-being48.
I see all over the world evidences that this spirit is alive and prospering49. In Switzerland, for instance, if a company earns more than a certain percentage upon its capital the surplus goes to the State to be used in the public interest—subsidise education and mitigate50 such poverty as there may be. As a fact—and as a result—you see very little poverty in Switzerland. In the Scandinavian countries, too, no man may become absurdly wealthy, and even in rich England a levelling-up process is in the act of formation by means of taxes upon the very wealthy. Soon I am hopeful that this spirit will spread among our Governments; it is the way to universal peace, for unquestionably money and the acquisition of money lies at the back of most international unrest.
It lies, if you think of it, behind this war. What was at the back of Germany’s dream of world-wide conquest? Was it not the expansion of her commerce? Was it not her envy of other nations’ wealth that drove her to seek a first place among the nations? She wanted to extend her borders, to en{252}large her trade, to increase her wealth. End this amazing of private fortunes and you will end this constant fighting and intriguing51 for power and position. America’s worship of the almighty52 dollar influences her attitude to-day.
I wonder shall we ever find a substitute for money which will reduce its value. The value of money is the curse of life; it leads to wars, it creates half the intrigues53 in Court and political life, it provokes senseless luxury. But I am talking of a Utopia, and we live in an age of greed and personal aggrandisement, however sure to those who look beneath the surface are the signs of coming reform.
One good thing the war will leave in its train is a recurrence54 of simplicity55. It cannot but be that the awful costliness56 of it all will reduce the means left for wastefulness57 in living. I wish the larger nations—and especially England and America—would study the life of the Scandinavian towns and see how much preferable is their simpler life, how much happier folk are when there is not this greed for gold, which takes up all one’s time and makes men forget the joy and the meaning of life while they are earning and cheating and hoarding58. There{253} should be a law preventing great possessions. I don’t mean that the genius in his business or profession should not be able to earn enough to give him greater comforts than those who have not succeeded so well as he—probably because they have not tried so hard. To give the industrious59 and the indolent an equal reward, to be sure, would set a premium60 on laziness, and much of the world’s work would go undone61. But there ought to be a limit to what a man can own, or what one company can earn, especially when there are so many quite deserving poor who are poor not because of indolence but through lack of opportunity.
This is a part of Socialism, and I know in England Socialism is a bad word to use. Socialism is unfortunate in its champions in England; Socialism has come to mean, in the popular, thoughtless sense of the word, strikes and demands for improved wages and conditions. No doubt Socialism would so revolutionise industry that the present wages and conditions would then seem antiquated to the point of medi?valism, but I think your wise men of England are those who carry on the work of social reformation and leave the word Socialism alone. Mr. Lloyd{254} George has the right idea; I call him a Socialist62, though perhaps he wouldn’t agree with the designation.
Will the new era which follows the close of this European holocaust63 be one of social advancement64? If so, the war will not have been in vain. And everything points that way.
In a second way, the war will bring improvement more complete than a generation of peace could ever have done. On the battlefields of France the British aristocrat65 and the boy from the slums will have met and become brothers. Class distinctions will break down not a little, and this is a good thing, for the private who came from the estates whereon his ancestors have lived for centuries, and the soldier who came from the foundry or the pit, have found each other of the same flesh and blood, comrades in a common cause. Hitherto the class distinctions have been very definite; they did not merge19. After the war those barriers will become far more shadowy.
Surely also if there are no more gigantic wars, but a vast curtailment66 of armaments, millions and millions will be saved, and this money, after settling the{255} war bills, will be available for setting our houses in order.
I do not think there will be any great hardships and poverty when the war is over. On the contrary I anticipate a great trade revival67, and in this respect the understanding between the present Allies will greatly increase the business done by them. Germany will no doubt be crippled, her military role will end, and her business men—among the best in the world—will find many of the old works closed. It will take Germany many years to rebuild her fortunes, for she will have made her one gigantic throw for world power, and lost.
France and England and Russia have between them most of the necessities of life, and this should tend to keep down the cost of those necessities. But I hope that a revival of trade will not mean a return to riotous68 living and deadening indulgence.
To all the Allies the war has brought individual unity within their own boundaries; there was danger of internal trouble in all three a year before the cloud burst. Undoubtedly69 the fears of civil war in Great Britain had some foundation; France was in a certain sense in a condition of unpreparedness;{256} and Russia was on the edge of a revolution. In a day these questions were laid aside. To-day the French army is as one man; France has behaved with a splendour that cannot be over-extolled, and she will never lose that power of cohesion70 she gained through the opening stages of this conflict. Indeed, in all the countries of the Allies I fancy the old questions will never recur in the same degree.
On the whole, then, the outlook has its bright side. We are appalled71 at the loss of life, at the desolation of territory, at the complicated wastage of war. But the Allies will come out of it stronger in many ways, not only with recovered territory—France with her long-lost children returned, and Russia no doubt with her southern port (which means her emancipation)—but with ancient instincts of race reawakened and sharpened, with broader views, particularly on the part of France and Great Britain; for this war has killed the distance across the English Channel, and England, losing her insularity72, will become more and more closely attached to her great Republican neighbour.
The End
The End
点击
收听单词发音
收听单词发音 |
1
civilisation
|
|
| n.文明，文化，开化，教化 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
2
averted
|
|
| 防止，避免( avert的过去式和过去分词 )； 转移 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
3
plunge
|
|
| v.跳入，(使)投入，(使)陷入；猛冲 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
4
tragic
|
|
| adj.悲剧的，悲剧性的，悲惨的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
5
bellicose
|
|
| adj.好战的；好争吵的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
6
utterance
|
|
| n.用言语表达，话语，言语 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
7
mere
|
|
| adj.纯粹的；仅仅，只不过 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
8
utterances
|
|
| n.发声( utterance的名词复数 )；说话方式；语调；言论 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
9
exhaustion
|
|
| n.耗尽枯竭，疲惫，筋疲力尽，竭尽，详尽无遗的论述 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
10
desolated
|
|
| adj.荒凉的，荒废的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
11
scattered
|
|
| adj.分散的，稀疏的；散步的；疏疏落落的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
12
unity
|
|
| n.团结，联合，统一；和睦，协调 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
13
antiquated
|
|
| adj.陈旧的，过时的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
14
monarchy
|
|
| n.君主，最高统治者；君主政体，君主国 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
15
monarchical
|
|
| adj. 国王的，帝王的，君主的，拥护君主制的 =monarchic | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
16
overthrow
|
|
| v.推翻，打倒，颠覆；n.推翻，瓦解，颠覆 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
17
patriotism
|
|
| n.爱国精神，爱国心，爱国主义 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
18
substantiate
|
|
| v.证实；证明...有根据 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
19
merge
|
|
| v.(使)结合，(使)合并，(使)合为一体 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
20
tottering
|
|
| adj.蹒跚的，动摇的v.走得或动得不稳( totter的现在分词 )；踉跄；蹒跚；摇摇欲坠 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
21
assassination
|
|
| n.暗杀；暗杀事件 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
22
monarchs
|
|
| 君主，帝王( monarch的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
23
prophesy
|
|
| v.预言；预示 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
24
disarm
|
|
| v.解除武装，回复平常的编制，缓和 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
25
arbitration
|
|
| n.调停，仲裁 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
26
millennium
|
|
| n.一千年，千禧年；太平盛世 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
27
marvelled
|
|
| v.惊奇，对…感到惊奇( marvel的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
28
remarkable
|
|
| adj.显著的，异常的，非凡的，值得注意的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
29
degenerate
|
|
| v.退步，堕落；adj.退步的，堕落的；n.堕落者 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
30
stamina
|
|
| n.体力；精力；耐力 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
31
grit
|
|
| n.沙粒，决心，勇气；v.下定决心，咬紧牙关 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
32
eschew
|
|
| v.避开，戒绝 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
33
extravagant
|
|
| adj.奢侈的；过分的；(言行等)放肆的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
34
phlegmatic
|
|
| adj.冷静的，冷淡的，冷漠的，无活力的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
35
disturbance
|
|
| n.动乱，骚动；打扰，干扰；(身心)失调 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
36
recur
|
|
| vi.复发，重现，再发生 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
37
curtail
|
|
| vt.截短，缩短；削减 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
38
abstemious
|
|
| adj.有节制的，节俭的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
39
insular
|
|
| adj.岛屿的，心胸狭窄的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
40
insurgent
|
|
| adj.叛乱的，起事的；n.叛乱分子 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
41
deliberately
|
|
| adv.审慎地；蓄意地；故意地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
42
amalgamated
|
|
| v.（使）（金属）汞齐化( amalgamate的过去式和过去分词 )；（使）合并；联合；结合 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
43
fixed
|
|
| adj.固定的，不变的，准备好的；(计算机)固定的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
44
discrepancies
|
|
| n.差异，不符合（之处），不一致（之处）( discrepancy的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
45
economists
|
|
| n.经济学家，经济专家( economist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
46
ethics
|
|
| n.伦理学；伦理观，道德标准 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
47
upheavals
|
|
| 突然的巨变( upheaval的名词复数 )； 大动荡； 大变动； 胀起 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
48
well-being
|
|
| n.安康，安乐，幸福 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
49
prospering
|
|
| 成功，兴旺( prosper的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
50
mitigate
|
|
| vt.（使）减轻，（使）缓和 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
51
intriguing
|
|
| adj.有趣的；迷人的v.搞阴谋诡计(intrigue的现在分词)；激起…的好奇心 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
52
almighty
|
|
| adj.全能的，万能的；很大的，很强的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
53
intrigues
|
|
| n.密谋策划( intrigue的名词复数 )；神秘气氛；引人入胜的复杂情节v.搞阴谋诡计( intrigue的第三人称单数 )；激起…的好奇心 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
54
recurrence
|
|
| n.复发，反复，重现 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
55
simplicity
|
|
| n.简单，简易；朴素；直率，单纯 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
56
costliness
|
|
| 昂贵的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
|
57
wastefulness
|
|
| 浪费，挥霍，耗费 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
58
hoarding
|
|
| n.贮藏；积蓄；临时围墙；囤积v.积蓄并储藏（某物）( hoard的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
59
industrious
|
|
| adj.勤劳的，刻苦的，奋发的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
60
premium
|
|
| n.加付款；赠品；adj.高级的；售价高的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
61
undone
|
|
| a.未做完的，未完成的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
62
socialist
|
|
| n.社会主义者；adj.社会主义的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
63
holocaust
|
|
| n.大破坏；大屠杀 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
64
advancement
|
|
| n.前进，促进，提升 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
65
aristocrat
|
|
| n.贵族，有贵族气派的人，上层人物 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
66
curtailment
|
|
| n.缩减，缩短 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
67
revival
|
|
| n.复兴，复苏，（精力、活力等的）重振 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
68
riotous
|
|
| adj.骚乱的；狂欢的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
69
undoubtedly
|
|
| adv.确实地，无疑地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
70
cohesion
|
|
| n.团结，凝结力 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
71
appalled
|
|
| v.使惊骇，使充满恐惧( appall的过去式和过去分词)adj.惊骇的；丧胆的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
72
insularity
|
|
| n.心胸狭窄；孤立；偏狭；岛国根性 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
| 欢迎访问英文小说网 |