In 1901, a reviewer of the Roman Index of Forbidden Books opened his criticism by congratulating himself upon having before him a genuine copy of that book, of which, he says, only a very limited number were printed for the exclusive use of “the leaders of the Church.” Owing to its scarcity1, he thinks, the owner of the volume, which he had borrowed, must have paid at least two hundred dollars for it. He could have bought a brand new copy for $2.25. The Index of which he speaks, issued by order of Leo XIII, in 1900, is for sale in this country by B. Herder, St. Louis, Mo. So 2are the three later editions (1901, 1904, 1907), the last two issued under, and by order of, our gloriously reigning2 Pontiff, Pius X. When the critic felt his heart beat with joy upon being allowed to view with his own blessed eyes a book so rare, so expensive, and so jealously guarded by “the leaders of the Church,” a whole edition of that same book had already been sold, and a second was about to be put on the market. Its title is now:
Index librorum prohibitorum, Leonis XIII Sum. Pont. auctoritate recognitus SS. D. N. Pii P. X iussu editus. Pr?mittuntur Constitutiones Apostolic? de examine et prohibitione librorum. (Index of forbidden books, revised by the authority of Pope Leo XIII, and issued by order of His Holiness Pope Pius X. Preceded by the Apostolic Constitutions on the examination and prohibition3 of books.)
A glance at the neatly4 printed volume will disclose the reason why it is called “Index”;—almost nine-tenths of it consists of a catalogue of books condemned6 by the Roman authorities. Of still greater 3importance than this catalogue are the first thirty-four pages, which give, in the “Apostolic Constitutions,” the general laws of the Church regarding books.
There are only two “Constitutions.” But the whole work is introduced by a brief of Leo XIII, in which the Pontiff declares that this edition is to be the authentic7 one for the whole Church. It is to be binding9 on all the faithful of the universe, regardless of race or language, nationality or country, education, learning or station in life. In a preface headed “Lectori S.,” the Secretary of the Roman “Congregatio Indicis” compares this edition of the “Index” with the former ones, points out the changes that were made, and explains the technical arrangement of the book.
After these preliminaries follow the “Constitutions.” The first is the “Officiorum ac munerum” of Leo XIII, dated Jan. 25, 1896. This document recasts the whole legislation of the Church regarding the production, dissemination10, reprinting and prohibition of such books as the Church may and must concern herself with. It 4abrogates all former laws and regulations of General Councils as well as of Sovereign Pontiffs, with one exception: the Constitution Sollicita ac provida of Benedict XIV, also reprinted here, by which this great pope established or rather sanctioned a method—the one still in use—of examining and passing sentence on the books submitted to the Roman authorities.
These two Constitutions contain the entire general legislation of the Church on the head of books.
There is no “Index expurgatorius.” If there were, it would consist of books condemned conditionally11, donec corrigatur, “until amended12.” But such books are all entered in the ordinary Index, with those two Latin words added. In Pope Leo’s edition they are, besides, marked with an asterisk13.
2. The Power of the Church.
That the Church has the right to legislate14 on the publication and use of all books that touch on questions of faith and morals, must be evident to every Catholic. It is 5a truth clearly contained in the words of Christ to St. Peter: “Feed my lambs, feed my sheep,” and in the duty imposed on the Apostles of “teaching the faithful to observe all, whatsoever15 I have commanded you.”
The fact that general councils as well as many popes have issued laws and decrees regarding books, is sufficient evidence of their power and of their commission to do this. This very fact must also convince us that the observation of these laws must be salutary and conducive16 to the welfare of the Church at large and of the individual Christian17.
The inventions, discoveries and progress of our times can introduce no change in this respect. The human mind is still as prone18 to err19 and as much subject to the persuasive20 influence of books as it ever was. Good books are as useful to-day as they were in olden times, and objectionable writings have the same deplorable effects they had a thousand years ago.
Nor can the Church, possessing the power to watch over our reading, neglect 6to make use of this power when the salvation21 of souls calls for its exercise. Bad literature is one of the worst enemies of mankind. The Church can never allow it to corrupt22 the hearts of her children or to undermine the foundation of their faith, without at least raising a warning voice.
How great are the precautions the civil authorities take in case of an epidemic23; yet, no matter how seriously the precautions hamper24 traffic and trade, we find them reasonable. We should even censure25 our executive and legislative26 officers if they omitted to take proper precautions. But, says Pope Leo, in the Constitution Officiorum ac munerum, nothing can be conceived more pernicious, more apt to defile27 souls than uncurbed license28 in the writing and disseminating29 of bad books. “Therefore,” he continues, “the Church, whose office it is to watch over the integrity of faith and morals, has ever striven, as far as in her power lay, to restrain the faithful from the reading of bad books as from a deadly poison.”
“The early days of the Church witnessed the earnest zeal32 of St. Paul,” when the Christians33 at Ephesus brought together all the superstitious34 books they had in their possession and burned them publicly. This example of loyalty35 to the Church cost them, as Holy Scripture36 says, between eight and nine thousand dollars. Such was the policy in regard to bad books at Ephesus at a time when the Apostle whom many love to call the most liberal and broadminded, ruled that part of the Church.
Every subsequent age records similar measures of vigilance. The first General Council of Nic?a, in 325, besides proscribing37 the heresy38 of Arius, also issued a decree prohibiting the use of Arius’ book Thalia, which contained his heresy; indeed, at all times the condemnation39 of a heresy by the Church entailed40 the prohibition of the works propagating it. Pope St. Leo the Great, 440–461, does not hesitate to declare that one who reads forbidden 8books cannot be considered a Catholic.
In the early days the Church had to direct her attention largely to the many so-called apocryphal41 books, falsely claimed to have been inspired by God and to form part of Holy Scripture. In 496, Pope Gelasius issued his famous decree, in which he enumerates42 the true books of the Bible, a number of the writings of the Fathers, (which he recommends,) together with a short list of apocryphal and heretical books, the reading of which he forbids.
In 745, by order of the Pope, a Roman synod examined and forbade a number of superstitious books sent by St. Boniface, who had found them among the Germans.
In fact, already in those days the entire present-day book legislation of the Church existed in all its essential features, though there were few written decrees. It seems the loyal Christian’s duty of avoiding bad books, and the power of the Church to prohibit them, were held to be so self-evident that the need of written laws was not felt.
The necessity of watching over the mental food of the faithful became more urgent 9when, in the fifteenth century, was invented printing, which popes and bishops43 hailed as a “divine art” and eulogised as the greatest blessing45 of God’s providence46 in the natural order. It spread rapidly. Before the year 1500, the city of Rome alone had one hundred and ninety printing establishments. The oldest of them, in the first seven years of its existence, produced not less than twenty-eight works in forty-seven editions, the total number of pages being one hundred and twenty-four millions.
As to the moral quality of the books printed at that period, a German, Wimpheling, writes with pardonable pride in 1507: “We Germans practically control the whole intellectual market of civilized47 Europe; the books, however, which we bring to this market are for the most part high-class works, tending to the honor of God, the salvation of souls, and the civilisation48 of the people.” How soon, alas49, was this to change! Even while these words were written, the evil was already striking root, and steps had been taken by the civil as well as by the ecclesiastical power, to 10prevent the printing and spreading of noxious50 books.
But it was not until the beginning of the so-called Reformation that the boundless51 increase of heretical and other pernicious literature called for radical52 and extensive measures. They began in 1520 with the solemn condemnation of Luther’s doctrine53 and the prohibition of his writings. About that time the first indexes or catalogues of forbidden books appeared. They were not issued by the popes, but emanated54 mostly from bishops, provincial55 councils, or universities. The civil power was expected to enforce them. In some cases the princes themselves or the magistrates56 of cities and republics issued their own indexes, in full harmony and after consultation57 with the clergy58.
As the object of these measures was to safeguard the faithful against imminent59 danger, we can easily understand that catalogues of forbidden books were most numerous in those countries that were most exposed to heresy, namely, Germany, Belgium, France, and Northern Italy.
11It is remarkable60 that Henry VIII of England, who afterwards fell away from the Church, was among the first to legislate against heretical books, his index of forbidden books appearing as early as 1526. After his apostasy61 he continued with increased severity the policy of prohibiting books which he deemed objectionable.
4. The Roman Index.
More than thirty years after the first index of Henry VIII had appeared, the first Roman Index of Forbidden Books was compiled and issued by order of Paul IV. It remained in force only a few years, till 1564, when the so-called Tridentine Index was published under Pius IV. It was called “Tridentine,” because it had been drawn62 up by a commission appointed for this purpose by the Council of Trent. It was milder than the Index of Paul IV, and contained divers63 “Index rules,” the forerunners64 of the general decrees embodied65 in the Constitution “Officiorum ac munerum.”
The Tridentine Index remained the Roman Index for more than three hundred 12years. Its “rules” were occasionally modified, new regulations were added or old ones abrogated66, other books were inserted in the catalogue; but the essential features remained the same.
In 1897, Leo XIII took the matter up again. The index of forbidden books was thoroughly67 revised. About a thousand were dropped. The “rules,” too, were overhauled68, “to make them milder, without altering their nature, so that it cannot be difficult or irksome for any person of good will to obey them.”
This, then, represents the whole book legislation of the Church. There are no other documents, except the decrees by which, as occasion demanded, individual books were forbidden. The encyclical of Pius X on Modernism merely enjoins69 on the bishops special vigilance in regard to publications infected with modernistic views.
This universal legislation, however, does not preclude70 the local prohibition of books by bishops or other ecclesiastical authorities. Thus Spain had, until 1820, its own 13Index, controlled by the Spanish Inquisition.
5. Books Forbidden by General or Particular Decrees.
As we have already mentioned, the Constitution “Officiorum ac munerum” establishes the general laws by which books are forbidden. As will be seen in our Summary, these laws deal with classes of books. The only one named expressly is the Bible. But all the books clearly contained in these classes are as strictly71, and sometimes even more strictly, condemned than those listed singly in the second part of the Index.
Pope Leo changed the Tridentine rules “without altering their nature.” It is, indeed, difficult to see how the nature of these regulations could have been changed. They simply express the point of view from which the Church must look upon objectionable publications. While opposing and condemning72 spoken error, the Church surely cannot allow full sway to the printed. In regard to the second part, or Index proper, many wrong notions are current. 14One of these is, that this Index contains all the books forbidden by the Church, and that there are no others which we are obliged to avoid. From the foregoing remarks, it must, on the contrary, be concluded that there are many other books forbidden by the laws of the Church. The worst of them are not in this special Index at all, because they fall under the general decrees.
It is by no means the intention of the Roman authorities to catalogue all the literary virus that has been vomited73 forth74 by printing presses all over the world in the course of four and a half centuries. By means of the general laws laid down in the “Officiorum ac munerum” we are in all cases able to see our duty.
There are especially two purposes for which books are prohibited separately and by name.
Whenever there is a doubt about the nature of a book, recourse may be had to Rome; sometimes the Roman authorities appointed for this purpose, will take up the 15matter without being appealed to. They will investigate and decide by putting the book on the Index, or, by dismissing it. This is the case with most books publicly censured75. It was the case with the books of Schell and Loisy, which, it was strongly urged by learned men, propagated ideas contrary, or at least dangerous, to the faith, though a host of followers76 admired them as orthodox masterpieces. Rome had to speak, and settled the controversy77 by condemning the books in question.
Dismissal does not always mean that a book is unobjectionable. The authorities may refrain from pronouncing deserved condemnation for reasons of prudence78 and expediency79.
Sometimes the preservation80 of discipline or religious unity81 necessitates82 this step. Thus about two hundred years ago the Pope had imposed silence on two factions83 that were carrying on a theological feud84. This silence was violated on both sides, a book appearing for the defence of either position. What was more natural than that both 16books should be put on the Index? These and similar cases could not be covered so clearly by the general decrees.
What has thus far been said, offers a partial solution of another current error. The Index is not a studiously selected, not even a systematically85 arranged catalogue of objectionable books. It was the need of the moment, doctrinal blunders, cavillations and heresies86, grievous trespasses87 against discipline and charity, proceeding88 from animosity or want of tact89, that caused the insertion of most of the books. In nearly all cases the Roman authorities confine themselves to books concerning which they are appealed to; and as there is no system in the making of these appeals, there can be no system in the condemnations. In the new Leonine edition of the Index the books are enumerated90 alphabetically91 by authors or pseudonyms92; anonymous93 books are listed according to titles.
It must now be obvious to the attentive94 reader why most of the books put on the Index are works on theology, or on the history and government of the Church, and 17why (as may be expected in the case of such publications), a considerable percentage are written in Latin. However, a goodly number of books are on the Index because they are detrimental95 to good morals. There are very few there which treat of the natural sciences. The Index will not busy itself with publications on electricity or X-rays, unless an author on a subject of this sort devote a considerable part of his work to attacks upon religion.
There are some well-meaning people who, while agreeing that the productions of Zola, Dumas and other writers of the same sort, fully96 deserve condemnation, cannot understand why works like Ranke’s History of the Popes, which is an acknowledged authority in its line, should be proscribed97. Such works are not on the Index for the good things they contain, but for the poison they mix with the wholesome98 food so cleverly that it takes more than ordinary scholarship and discretion99 to separate the one from the other.
The Roman Committee of Cardinals100, which has charge of this part of ecclesiastical 18discipline, is not at all bent102 on proscribing books. Works like the one mentioned are never put on the Index unless it is quite clear that the mischief103 to be feared from them will far outweigh104 the good they may do. Scholars and students well grounded in their faith, who have a real and legitimate105 cause for reading a forbidden book can easily obtain a dispensation.
It is clear from the preceding explanations that a book may sometimes be dropped from the Index. This is done when a book has long ceased to be dangerous, or a cause of dissension, or if it has fallen into oblivion. Thus Pope Leo XIII caused to be expunged106 about a thousand titles. This does not imply a reproach for the authorities of former centuries, much less the giving up of an iota107 of the old principles.
6. Duties Imposed by Law and by Nature.
Suppose a person were so well grounded in faith and virtue108, so thoroughly versed109 in theology, philosophy, and the natural sciences, that the reading of books e. g. 19on Christian Science, or the works of Voltaire, would not harm him. The Index prohibits these books; would he whom they could not harm be allowed to read them? As we put the case, he would, by reading them, not commit the sin of seriously endangering his soul. Yet he would sin by disregarding a positive law of the Church. These laws are like the precautionary measures taken by the civil authorities in times of epidemic; if they are to have the desired effect, they must be observed by all. When the community is under quarantine, those who declare themselves free from the disease must observe the regulations as well as the rest.
Let those who think they have a good reason for reading a forbidden book, and who are not mistaken in supposing that there is no danger for them, humbly110 ask for permission, as did the Saints. By doing so they declare that the standpoint of the Church is theirs, and that they willingly submit to a power which was entrusted111 with the care of “teaching to observe whatsoever I have commanded you.” “We 20have to develop a loving habit of loyalty and obedience112 to the Church as to Christ, our Savior.”
Suppose, on the other hand, there were no Church laws prohibiting pernicious reading. In that case should we be allowed to read any book we pleased? By no means. We should then, it is true, by reading, e. g., Zola’s novels, not commit an act of disobedience to the Church. But, as already hinted, there is another duty imposed on us by God Himself—the grave duty to guard our soul from serious danger. This duty does not depend on any positive law or decree of authority, and it equally binds113 the Christian and the non-Christian. It is expressed in the fifth commandment: “Thou shalt not kill.” This duty corresponds on our part to what we ask of God in the sixth petition of the Our Father: “Lead us not into temptation.” We should undoubtedly114 violate it by reading Zola’s filthy115 works. The prohibition of these works by the Church merely adds another obligation to that imposed by the natural law, thereby116 considerably117 strengthening 21our will and enabling us to resist every enticement118 to read what can be read only at a serious risk to our soul.
This grave duty, therefore, is not imposed by the Church and cannot be taken away by the Church. It is a natural duty and as such remains119 in force even after we are granted a formal permission, which is neither intended nor able to suppress temptations that may arise from the perusal120 of bad books. If we have a good reason to apply for permission—curiosity is not a good reason—then and then only can we expect a special protection from Divine Providence. Of course, this protection does not dispense121 us from the necessity of using all the means of self-protection, both natural and supernatural.
I know of a priest who was in every way a model man. He fell suddenly away from the Church, married, and is now a foremost champion in the ranks of the enemy. His apostasy is, not without reason, attributed to the reading of infidel books, though no doubt he had the necessary dispensation.
22There was another priest, who has meanwhile died the death of the just, a celebrated122 author and art critic. In writing a work on Voltaire he had to study the books of that arch-agnostic. He obtained the requisite123 permission, but, while perusing124 Voltaire’s writings, he was on his knees, to implore125, as it were, by this humble126 posture127 the protection of God against the wicked influence to which he was exposed.
St. Francis of Sales, the great and learned Bishop44 of Geneva, had obtained permission to read the books of heretics in order to refute them, and he is careful to let his readers know the fact, at the same time thanking God in pathetic words that his soul had suffered no harm in so great a danger.
This grave natural duty in the choice of our reading matter extends much farther than the legislation of the Church. Parents and priests do not comply with their obligation of controlling the reading of their charges if they merely look up the Index to see whether a certain book is mentioned there. If an otherwise unobjectionable 23book contains an obscene passage of a page or so, no one will claim that it falls under the general law prohibiting obscene books. Nor is it likely to be put on the Index. Yet such a book is apt to work havoc128 in the innocent soul of your daughter or son, perhaps in your own. As long as that passage is in it, the book—even though it is not on the Index—cannot and must not, under pain of sin, be allowed in the hands of children.
Would that this twofold duty were always faithfully complied with, especially in our large cities, where books of every sort are within easy reach. Do not many, perhaps all, public libraries offer among other books such as are “derogatory to the Church, the hierarchy129, the religious state,” and especially novels which “defend as lawful130 or tolerable, freemasonry, suicide, divorce”? How can we expect our young people to have Catholic views on courtship and marriage, on the priesthood, on the veneration131 of the saints, if we allow them to imbibe132 the ideas of such writers as Balzac or Dumas? It is deplorable enough 24that the modern novel is the catechism of millions outside of the Church. We must not allow it to displace the Catholic catechism or to unteach, totally or in part, the truths taught by it.
7. Who Puts Books On The Index?
The popes have at all times exercised the prerogative133 of their supreme134 office as guardians135 of the faith by condemning books opposed to the faith. The latest of such condemnations is that, in 1862, of the works of the Munich professor, Frohschammer, who answered this condemnation by falling away from the Church. There are in all 144 books that were individually proscribed by a papal document. In Pope Leo’s edition they are marked with a dagger136. Yet only in cases of the utmost importance did the popes act themselves. To facilitate the government of the world-wide Church, in the course of centuries special committees of cardinals were appointed, to whom part of the pontiff’s various duties were entrusted. These committees are styled Congregations. A larger or smaller 25number of learned priests and bishops, generally called Consultors, assist the cardinals and practically do the greater part of the work, though the final decision in all cases is reserved to the cardinals.
The highest of these Roman Congregations is the Sacrum Officium or “General Inquisition,” called also the “Congregation of the Holy Office,” of which the Pope himself is Prefect. Its purpose is especially to watch over the purity of faith. It is this august body that, after the Pope himself, is in the first place called to judge the doctrines137 propounded138 in any book. It was this Congregation that performed the preparatory work for the first Index of Paul IV, and, although another congregation for the examining of books was soon after established, the Sacrum Officium continued to exercise the same power. As may be expected, especially such works as seemed to affect the integrity of the faith, were submitted to this supreme court. In our days the works of the French priest Loisy were proscribed by the Sacrum Officium.
26But the bulk of this work is at present performed by the Congregatio Indicis librorum prohibitorum, or “Congregation of the Index of Forbidden Books.” It was founded by Saint Pius V in 1571, seven years after the publication of the Tridentine Index. Since then about eighty per cent. of all individual prohibitions of books have emanated from it. Its Prefect is a cardinal101. The present one is Cardinal Segna. The perpetual assistant and secretary are always members of the Dominican order. Besides the seven or ten cardinals there are about thirty consultors, many of whom are bishops.
Though three or four prohibitions of books have emanated from other Roman authorities, the practice has been to let either the Sacrum Officium or the Congregation of the Index decide in all cases. The latter Congregation, moreover, had to register all condemnations pronounced by any of the legitimate authorities and to see that they were entered in the new editions of the Index.
Our present Holy Father, Pius X, has 27lately brought about a long desired reform in the central government of the Church. The competency of many of the Roman Congregations has been more clearly defined, and several of those originally instituted have been either suppressed or united with others. The Congregation of the Index has received a wider sphere and greater power. While formerly139 it passed only on books in regard to which it was expressly appealed to, it has now become a regular vigilance committee for the whole Church. The Holy Father says: “For the future it shall be the province of this Sacred Congregation not only to examine diligently140 the books reported to it, to prohibit them, if this should seem well, and to concede dispensations; but also to officially investigate in the best available way whether writings of any kind that should be condemned are being circulated; and to remind the ordinaries how strictly they are bound to condemn5 pernicious writings and to denounce them to the Holy See.”
On the relation of the Congregation of the Index to that of the Sacrum Officium 28(Holy Office) the Pope says: “As the prohibition of books has very frequently the scope of defense141 of the Faith, which is also the object of the Congregation of the Holy Office, we decree that in future in all things relating to the prohibition of books, and in those alone, the Cardinals, Consultors and officers of both congregations, may communicate with one another, and that all of them shall be bound by the same secret.”
The Roman Congregations are not infallible. But they represent the Pope in his highest capacity as shepherd of the entire flock of Christ. Therefore we owe them obedience. Their regulations and orders must find us even more willing to obey than those of our bishops and pastors142, to whom only a small portion of Christ’s kingdom is entrusted.
8. The Method of Examination.
Our confidence in the fairness of the verdicts of the S. Congregation of the Index will be much increased, if we acquaint ourselves with the method it follows in carrying 29out its arduous144, odious145 and yet very important task. This method is practically the same for both the Holy Office and the Index. The usual procedure is based mainly on the regulations laid down in the Bull of Pope Benedict XIV, “Sollicita ac provida.”
When a book is reported to the Index Congregation, the secretary first tries to ascertain146 whether it is worth examining. He also inquires by letter from bishops and other reliable persons about the advisability of a condemnation. Several consultors assist him in this preliminary investigation147; but the Cardinal Prefect has to ratify148 their decision.
If they think the book should be examined, it is handed to a consultor, who has to study it carefully and to draw up a detailed149 report, noting exactly the passages which he finds objectionable, and conscientiously150 pointing out all redeeming151 features. His report together with the book is passed on to other consultors, each of whom can thus satisfy himself whether the first “examiner’s” verdict is fair, and has 30also an opportunity to formulate152 his own view. One question they have to answer is, whether the condemnation is likely to have a good effect.
After comparing the opinions of the consultors, the secretary of the Congregation draws up an official statement of the reasons for and against a prohibition, which statement together with the book is submitted to the Cardinal Prefect, by whose orders it is printed and a copy sent to each cardinal and consultor of the Congregation.
Next a preparatory meeting of the consultors is called for a previous discussion. The consultor who examined the book speaks first, then all the others, beginning with the youngest. The secretary carefully records the views of each consultor, together with his reasons.
At least ten days must elapse between this meeting and the solemn session of the whole Congregation, in which the question is finally decided153 by a vote of the cardinals.
The decision arrived at is commonly given in one of these four technical phrases: 31Damnetur, “condemned”; dimittatur, “dismissed”; donec corrigatur, “forbidden until amended”; res dilata, “the case is postponed154.” The verdict donec corrigatur of course, can only be given when a book admits of correction; when it is thoroughly bad (e. g. written for the sole purpose of eulogizing Freemasonry or maligning155 Catholic bishops), a donec corrigatur would have no meaning.
Finally, the secretary of the Congregation lays the whole matter before the Pope, who, if he sees fit, authorizes156 the publication of the decree.
Nobody will deny that this is a very excellent method of procedure. Under it a book is examined at least three times, and twenty-five or thirty picked scholars participate in the proceedings157, each of whom has taken a solemn oath never to allow himself to be influenced by sympathy or antipathy158 and to have nothing in view but the eternal welfare of souls.
If the author is a Catholic, he must be informed before the decree is published. If but a few copies of the book have been 32sold, and the author promises either to suppress it, or to issue an amended edition, if possible, the decree is not published. But even when this cannot be prevented, e. g. when a whole edition is already in circulation, credit is given to the author in the decree itself for declaring his submission159, by adding the words: auctor laudabiliter se subjecit, “the author has praiseworthily submitted.”
Great care is taken to have all books examined by men who are not only well versed in the subject matter, but who also understand thoroughly the language in which they happen to be written. Nor does the Congregation in important cases confine itself to its regular consultors; whenever it seems advisable, the services of other competent critics are enlisted160.
All the members of the Congregation are bound by oath to keep absolute secrecy161 with regard to every detail of the official transactions, no matter whether a book under discussion is finally condemned or not. By this means each feels more free in 33giving his opinion, and the reputation of the author is spared as long and as much as possible.
9. The Spirit of the Congregation of the Index.
As to the spirit that should actuate the members of the Congregation of the Index, the rules laid down for its consultors by Benedict XIV in the Bull “Sollicita ac provida” are instructive.
“Ipsos ... monemus ac vehementer hortamur ut in examine iudicioque librorum sequentes regulas diligenter inspiciant accurateque custodiant.” “We wish to admonish162 and exhort163 them most urgently to study carefully and observe accurately164 the following rules for examining and judging books:
1. Let them not imagine that it is their duty to use every means to bring about the condemnation of the books submitted to them. They ought rather to study such books conscientiously, without passion or anxiety (sedato animo), in order to 34furnish such well-found observations, such objective reasons, as will enable the Congregation to pass a just verdict.
2. Should a consultor find that he is not competent to judge a book which he is asked to examine, let him know that he will not be free from guilt165, either before God or man, unless he at once confesses his incompetence166. Far from damaging his reputation with the pope or the cardinals, such an avowal167 will rather gain their esteem168 and praise for his straightforwardness169 and honesty.
3. Let them set aside absolutely all prejudice in favor of nation, family, school or order; let them relinquish170 all party spirit, and keep before their minds the undoubted doctrine of the Church, as laid down in the decrees of the councils, in papal documents, etc., knowing that there are opinions that, while they seem certain to one nation, school, or order, are, with the knowledge of the Holy See, opposed by others; the Holy See leaving all these opinions in their degree of probability.
4. It must also be borne in mind that 35it is impossible to judge fairly the meaning of a passage, unless the entire book is studied, and unless the various statements found in different sections are compared with one another, and the whole purpose of the book is steadily171 kept in view.
5. If an author who enjoys the reputation of sound theological learning, has used expressions which might be understood in a wrong as well as in a right meaning, fairness demands that they be, as far as possible, interpreted in his favor.
These and similar rules ... must be kept before the minds of the consultors, in order that they may have due regard for their own conscience, the good name of authors, the interests of the Church, and the welfare of souls.”
10. Further Explanations.
A. Why an Author is Not Permitted to Defend His Book.
If an author could accompany every copy of his work that leaves the bookstore or library, he would be able to explain 36obscure passages and to show what meaning he wished doubtful phrases to convey to the reader. It is precisely172 because he cannot multiply himself that he employs printer’s ink to convey his ideas to others. It must, therefore, be supposed that his words mean what he intends to say. The reader, at any rate, has no corrective. He has only the book, not the author to fall back upon. It is impossible to recur173 to the author when there is question of the correctness or incorrectness of a book. If the author has to be called upon to explain the meaning of his book, he should have left it unprinted.
Moreover, it is hardly credible174, as Pope Benedict XIV points out, that anything an author might advance in his favor, should escape so many examiners without receiving due attention and emphasis.
The whole procedure is primarily not intended as a measure against the author, although pecuniary175 loss may ensue, but to protect the faithful. A condemnation is rather a warning to the would-be reader, than a punishment inflicted176 upon the 37author. It is not an act of jurisdiction177. Were the author’s personal views under investigation, he would be summoned personally before another tribunal and tried according to a method that would give him the amplest opportunity to defend himself.
These considerations also show that the condemnation of a book after its author’s death is not unreasonable178. A book remains what it is independently of its author. Nor would it change the nature of a book were the author afterwards to prove his orthodoxy to the satisfaction of the authorities, or to do penance179 in sackcloth and ashes, or for the rest of his mortal life consort180 with the Trappists. Were it morally certain, however, that almost all the copies of a book were destroyed, a prohibitory decree would fail of its purpose.
B. The Index Does Not Advertise Bad Books.
Now and then there is expressed an apprehension181 lest the Index, far from suppressing, rather advertises bad books and arouses a desire to read them. It is even 38maintained that in some cases evil-minded authors have intentionally182 written so as to get their books put on the Index.
Now, every prohibitory law may have the effect of increasing the inclination183 of men towards the prohibited thing or act. Thus a person may possibly feel a stronger appetite for meat on Friday than on any other day of the week. We have inherited this tendency from Eve, who, when tempted184, saw that the forbidden fruit “was good to eat and fair to the eye and delightful185 to behold,” and then proceeded to violate the first prohibitory law ever given. But is that a reason to do away with every prohibitory law?
Who does not see at once that the Index must prove a very poor advertising186 medium? Those who have it are certainly not the prospective187 buyers of immoral188 novels or of works which propagate heretical views in theology; while those who hanker after sensationalism or doubtful theology will not invest $2.25 for a book list which contains, e. g. for the year 1898, fully eight 39titles, four of which are German, and for 1903 fifteen, all French.
This side of the question, as we have remarked elsewhere, is also in each case carefully weighed by the Sacred Congregation, before it resolves upon a prohibition.
Even if the sale of a book should be increased by the fact of its condemnation, the Index would nevertheless achieve its main purpose, namely, to warn the faithful that the ideas advocated in the proscribed book are contrary to faith and morals. This is enough for all men of good will to enable them to shun189 the poison. Those who refuse to heed190 the warning will have to blame their own ignorance or malice191 if the reading of a condemned book results in spiritual hurt.
C. Index Decisions Not Omitted for Fear of Apostasies192.
A book, we are reminded, often represents the opinions not only of its author, but of many of his disciples193 and admirers. By forbidding it and thus branding such 40opinions as erroneous, it is said, many influential194 men may become embittered195 and may even be driven into an attitude of open hostility196.
However, the Church is in duty bound to exercise her guardianship197; which she cannot do if every one is to have his own way. Nor can the Church neglect the mass of her children in order to accommodate this or that coterie198 or school, whose opinions are manifestly wrong.
Moreover, to be a trustworthy guide, the Church must state the truth clearly and unmistakably. The faithful are not guided by ambiguous circumlocutions, by terms that may be understood in two or perhaps more ways. Neither may she keep exclusively in the lofty heights of theory; but she must instruct with regard to the facts of everyday life. The dangers arising from books are concrete not abstract, and they must be met by concrete measures. This can be done effectively only by an energetic and unmistakable “thou shalt not,” which makes men realize that they are “under authority.”
41No one has ever stated the truth more clearly, more unmistakably than Christ our Lord. Was it not precisely for this very fact that “many of His disciples went back and walked no more with Him”? (John 6, 67.)
D. The “Good Catholic.”
“I am a Catholic. I live up to my religion and go regularly to the sacraments. I have had a good Catholic education and hear a sermon every Sunday. I do not see why I should be afraid to read any book, even if it belonged to those forbidden by the Index.”
You may do so; but you may fare in consequence as David fared—David who was a saint and yet committed adultery and murder. If you read a forbidden book without permission, you are as good a Catholic as one who eats meat on Friday. The object of the law of abstinence is to make sure that every Christian performs at least a certain minimum of penance. Now there are saintly persons who, in imitation of our crucified Savior, do more penance on 42ordinary days than the average Catholic does by abstaining199 from meat on twenty or more Fridays; and yet they are not exempted200 from the law of abstinence and would be the last to claim such an exemption201.
Similarly the object of the Index is to make sure that every Christian avoids at least the worst books. By obeying its laws we declare that our standpoint is that of the Church of God. This result cannot be obtained unless the prohibition is made universal, exempting202 no one, no matter how pious203 or learned he may be. Therefore, all Christians, good and bad, priests, religious and lay people, students and professors, unless they have a dispensation, are bound by the ecclesiastical laws regarding books. By asking for a dispensation we implicitly204 acknowledge and approve of the official position of the Church on the subject of wicked books, and, so far as in us lies, ratify and sanction the reasons which lead to their condemnation.
You say you are a good Catholic, and therefore this law does not bind8 you. Are 43there any commandments of the Church that bind only bad Catholics?
E. A Mortal Sin.
“I am told that a transgression206 of the Index law is a mortal sin. Can it be true that the Church, the kindest of mothers, should load us down with such a severe obligation?”
According to the theologians, the reading of a forbidden book, or of a considerable part of it, is a mortal sin. The selection of the books on which our souls feed is a matter of no small importance. True, the Church is the kindest of mothers; but she is also the wisest. To direct the consciences of her children and “to restrain them from the reading of bad books as from a deadly poison,” is the great object of her legislation. Under the leadership of a mastermind like that of Leo XIII, the Roman authorities have labored207 for years in formulating208 the present ecclesiastical laws about books. These laws are the voice of the supreme pastor143, the successor of St. Peter. 44Let us not spurn209 it like the heathen and the publican.
F. The Galileo Case.
The Roman Congregations are no more infallible than our bishops and pastors. And yet there is practically but one case, during more than three centuries, in which they are accused of having made a mistake. It is the condemnation, by both the Holy Office and the Index, of Galileo Galilei Linceo (died 1639) for defending the theory that the earth moves around its own axis210 and around the sun.
This teaching was according to the common belief of Catholics and Protestants, at that time, clearly opposed to Holy Scripture, which the Church was bound to vindicate211. If Galileo’s theory was true, the traditional interpretation212 of sundry213 Bible texts would have had to be abandoned.
The Church had weighty reasons for not allowing this. The new theory was not at all certain. Galileo himself admitted he could not establish more than a probability. 45Several very obvious objections he was unable to explain satisfactorily. None of the real proofs used in our days were known to him. He was told by the Jesuit Cardinal Bellarmin, if he could advance any convincing proof for his theory, the traditional interpretation of those passages would be given up. But all Galileo had to offer was an ingenious hypothesis. Had he advocated it as such with due respect for the time-honored interpretation of the Book of Books, had he not used bold, sometimes bitter and defying language, no steps would have been taken against him, who had until then been a favorite of the pope and of many dignitaries. As matters stood, “the Church could wait for the education of a physical system, but she could not allow a change in the universally accepted interpretation of Scripture, before the necessity of such a change was proved.” (Guggenberger, History of the Christian Era. Vol. II, pp. 456, etc.)
“The marvelous unanimity214 of the enemies of the Church in concentrating all their attacks against the Roman Congregation 46on the case of Galileo, is a striking negative testimony215 to the value of the decisions of courts which have been at work for centuries.” (Rome.)
G. State and Protestant Book Laws.
As we have already remarked, Henry VIII continued his policy of proscribing books opposed to his views long after he had constituted himself the head of the English Church. Between 1526 and 1546 there were issued by the King’s authority nine catalogues of books which Englishmen were forbidden to read. Among these books were the works of the continental216 “reformers”; for some years the English Bible; also writings against the King’s matrimonial projects.
The Protestants on the continent followed the same system. Calvin condemned a Spanish physician, who happened to come to Geneva, to be burned at the stake, because he had written a heretical book. The Protestant princes and republics had each its special book-legislation, which was made 47to serve not only religious but also political purposes.
After the middle of the eighteenth century, in almost all Catholic countries, the civil power usurped217 the monopoly of proscribing books, and practiced it in a truly despotic way. Thus in Austria 639 books were forbidden within five years. No book was allowed to be printed without previous permission, not even on forestry218 or cattle-raising. Bishops were severely219 reproved for enforcing the prohibitions of the Roman Index in their seminaries.
Napoleon I had a publisher shot, practically without trial, for issuing a work contrary to his political plans. One book was publicly burned because it contained the picture of Pius VII. To enable the authorities to control the book trade more effectively, no printing establishment was allowed to have, in Paris more than four, and in the provinces more than two, presses.
Needless to remark, the civil authorities have the right to prohibit books that seriously endanger the common welfare. If 48they use this right in a reasonable way, their measures are likely to bring about good and prevent evil. We all have occasional opportunities to observe this in the measures taken against immoral literature by the police or the post-office department.
H. Some Examples of Submission to the Index.
The first Roman Index, that of 1559, was considered rather severe. One of the influential men who tried hard to have its provisions softened220, was Blessed Peter Canisius, the “Second Apostle of Germany.” Yet the very letters he wrote to Rome for this purpose show that he scrupulously221 observed all the regulations, though he himself, called the “Hammer of Heretics,” surely incurred222 little personal risk by reading forbidden books.
About 1698, a book by Archbishop Fénelon was under investigation at Rome. Fénelon was a great scholar and one of the greatest preachers of all centuries, but he was also a loyal son of the Church. He knew a condemnation of his book would 49mean his own condemnation in the eyes of Catholic France. His friends as well as his antagonists223 were eagerly awaiting Rome’s decision on one of the great churchman’s books. At last the verdict was pronounced in the most solemn way by the Pope himself, and it was a condemnation. Fénelon was just ascending224 his pulpit, March 25, 1699, when his brother broke the news to him. The great Archbishop at once proceeded to read to his own flock the papal document and preached an eloquent225 sermon on the obedience every Christian owes to his superiors. We can imagine what a profound impression his words must have made. His was a truly heroic example of self-abnegation.
In 1861 there died in Munich Ernest von Lasaulx, a famous professor of the University. In his writings he had now and then been very bold, and it was rumored226 that the Congregation of the Index thought of censuring227 some of his books. Von Lasaulx knew this. A few weeks before his death he made an implicit205 retraction228 of the errors he might have involuntarily committed, 50which was forwarded to Rome by his friends. Already some years before he had declared that he had never intended to contravene229 the doctrine of the Church, but that he feared there were many errors in his books. “If Rome would think it advisable to put my books on the Index, I should consider the verdict perfectly230 just, since I firmly believe that such measures are truly in the interest of the Catholic Church in our times.” Four of his books were really condemned after his death.
In July, 1906, an Italian novel, Il Santo, (The Saint) by Fogazzaro, was put on the Index. The author “submitted himself.” An American edition of the book had meanwhile appeared; “but the prohibition by the Roman authorities was duly respected by the publishers of the leading Catholic papers of America, which declined to accept advertisements of the book.” (Putnam.)
点击
收听单词发音
收听单词发音 |
1
scarcity
|
|
| n.缺乏，不足，萧条 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
2
reigning
|
|
| adj.统治的，起支配作用的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
3
prohibition
|
|
| n.禁止；禁令，禁律 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
4
neatly
|
|
| adv.整洁地，干净地，灵巧地，熟练地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
5
condemn
|
|
| vt.谴责，指责；宣判(罪犯)，判刑 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
6
condemned
|
|
| adj. 被责难的, 被宣告有罪的 动词condemn的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
7
authentic
|
|
| a.真的，真正的；可靠的，可信的，有根据的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
8
bind
|
|
| vt.捆，包扎；装订；约束；使凝固；vi.变硬 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
9
binding
|
|
| 有约束力的，有效的，应遵守的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
10
dissemination
|
|
| 传播,宣传,传染(病毒) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
11
conditionally
|
|
| adv. 有条件地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
12
Amended
|
|
| adj. 修正的 动词amend的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
13
asterisk
|
|
| n.星号，星标 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
14
legislate
|
|
| vt.制定法律；n.法规，律例；立法 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
15
whatsoever
|
|
| adv.（用于否定句中以加强语气）任何；pron.无论什么 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
16
conducive
|
|
| adj.有益的，有助的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
17
Christian
|
|
| adj.基督教徒的；n.基督教徒 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
18
prone
|
|
| adj.(to)易于…的，很可能…的；俯卧的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
19
err
|
|
| vi.犯错误，出差错 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
20
persuasive
|
|
| adj.有说服力的，能说得使人相信的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
21
salvation
|
|
| n.（尤指基督）救世，超度，拯救，解困 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
22
corrupt
|
|
| v.贿赂，收买；adj.腐败的，贪污的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
23
epidemic
|
|
| n.流行病；盛行；adj.流行性的，流传极广的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
24
hamper
|
|
| vt.妨碍，束缚，限制；n.(有盖的)大篮子 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
25
censure
|
|
| v./n.责备；非难；责难 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
26
legislative
|
|
| n.立法机构，立法权；adj.立法的，有立法权的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
27
defile
|
|
| v.弄污，弄脏；n.(山间)小道 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
28
license
|
|
| n.执照，许可证，特许；v.许可，特许 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
29
disseminating
|
|
| 散布，传播( disseminate的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
30
prohibitions
|
|
| 禁令，禁律( prohibition的名词复数 )； 禁酒； 禁例 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
31
antedating
|
|
| v.（在历史上）比…为早( antedate的现在分词 )；先于；早于；（在信、支票等上）填写比实际日期早的日期 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
|
32
zeal
|
|
| n.热心，热情，热忱 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
33
Christians
|
|
| n.基督教徒( Christian的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
34
superstitious
|
|
| adj.迷信的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
35
loyalty
|
|
| n.忠诚，忠心 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
36
scripture
|
|
| n.经文，圣书，手稿；Scripture:(常用复数)《圣经》，《圣经》中的一段 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
37
proscribing
|
|
| v.正式宣布（某事物）有危险或被禁止( proscribe的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
38
heresy
|
|
| n.异端邪说；异教 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
39
condemnation
|
|
| n.谴责; 定罪 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
40
entailed
|
|
| 使…成为必要( entail的过去式和过去分词 )； 需要； 限定继承； 使必需 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
41
apocryphal
|
|
| adj.假冒的，虚假的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
42
enumerates
|
|
| v.列举，枚举，数( enumerate的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
43
bishops
|
|
| （基督教某些教派管辖大教区的）主教( bishop的名词复数 )； （国际象棋的）象 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
44
bishop
|
|
| n.主教，（国际象棋）象 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
45
blessing
|
|
| n.祈神赐福；祷告；祝福，祝愿 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
46
providence
|
|
| n.深谋远虑，天道，天意；远见；节约；上帝 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
47
civilized
|
|
| a.有教养的，文雅的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
48
civilisation
|
|
| n.文明，文化，开化，教化 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
49
alas
|
|
| int.唉(表示悲伤、忧愁、恐惧等) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
50
noxious
|
|
| adj.有害的，有毒的；使道德败坏的，讨厌的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
51
boundless
|
|
| adj.无限的；无边无际的；巨大的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
52
radical
|
|
| n.激进份子，原子团，根号；adj.根本的，激进的，彻底的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
53
doctrine
|
|
| n.教义；主义；学说 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
54
emanated
|
|
| v.从…处传出，传出( emanate的过去式和过去分词 )；产生，表现，显示 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
55
provincial
|
|
| adj.省的，地方的；n．外省人，乡下人 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
56
magistrates
|
|
| 地方法官，治安官( magistrate的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
57
consultation
|
|
| n.咨询；商量；商议；会议 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
58
clergy
|
|
| n.[总称]牧师，神职人员 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
59
imminent
|
|
| adj.即将发生的，临近的，逼近的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
60
remarkable
|
|
| adj.显著的，异常的，非凡的，值得注意的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
61
apostasy
|
|
| n.背教，脱党 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
62
drawn
|
|
| v.拖，拉，拔出；adj.憔悴的，紧张的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
63
divers
|
|
| adj.不同的；种种的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
64
forerunners
|
|
| n.先驱( forerunner的名词复数 )；开路人；先兆；前兆 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
65
embodied
|
|
| v.表现( embody的过去式和过去分词 )；象征；包括；包含 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
66
abrogated
|
|
| 废除（法律等）( abrogate的过去式和过去分词 )； 取消； 去掉； 抛开 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
67
thoroughly
|
|
| adv.完全地，彻底地，十足地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
68
overhauled
|
|
| v.彻底检查( overhaul的过去式和过去分词 )；大修；赶上；超越 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
69
enjoins
|
|
| v.命令( enjoin的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
70
preclude
|
|
| vt.阻止，排除，防止；妨碍 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
71
strictly
|
|
| adv.严厉地，严格地；严密地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
72
condemning
|
|
| v.（通常因道义上的原因而）谴责( condemn的现在分词 )；宣判；宣布…不能使用；迫使…陷于不幸的境地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
73
vomited
|
|
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
74
forth
|
|
| adv.向前；向外，往外 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
75
censured
|
|
| v.指责，非难，谴责( censure的过去式 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
76
followers
|
|
| 追随者( follower的名词复数 )； 用户； 契据的附面； 从动件 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
77
controversy
|
|
| n.争论，辩论，争吵 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
78
prudence
|
|
| n.谨慎，精明，节俭 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
79
expediency
|
|
| n.适宜；方便；合算；利己 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
80
preservation
|
|
| n.保护，维护，保存，保留，保持 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
81
unity
|
|
| n.团结，联合，统一；和睦，协调 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
82
necessitates
|
|
| 使…成为必要，需要( necessitate的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
83
factions
|
|
| 组织中的小派别，派系( faction的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
84
feud
|
|
| n.长期不和；世仇；v.长期争斗；世代结仇 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
85
systematically
|
|
| adv.有系统地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
86
heresies
|
|
| n.异端邪说，异教( heresy的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
87
trespasses
|
|
| 罪过( trespass的名词复数 )； 非法进入 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
88
proceeding
|
|
| n.行动，进行，(pl.)会议录，学报 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
89
tact
|
|
| n.机敏，圆滑，得体 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
90
enumerated
|
|
| v.列举，枚举，数( enumerate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
91
alphabetically
|
|
| adv.照字母顺序排列地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
92
pseudonyms
|
|
| n.假名，化名，（尤指）笔名( pseudonym的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
93
anonymous
|
|
| adj.无名的；匿名的；无特色的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
94
attentive
|
|
| adj.注意的，专心的；关心(别人)的，殷勤的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
95
detrimental
|
|
| adj.损害的，造成伤害的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
96
fully
|
|
| adv.完全地，全部地，彻底地；充分地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
97
proscribed
|
|
| v.正式宣布（某事物）有危险或被禁止( proscribe的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
98
wholesome
|
|
| adj.适合；卫生的；有益健康的；显示身心健康的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
99
discretion
|
|
| n.谨慎；随意处理 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
100
cardinals
|
|
| 红衣主教( cardinal的名词复数 )； 红衣凤头鸟（见于北美，雄鸟为鲜红色）； 基数 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
101
cardinal
|
|
| n.(天主教的)红衣主教；adj.首要的，基本的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
102
bent
|
|
| n.爱好，癖好；adj.弯的；决心的，一心的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
103
mischief
|
|
| n.损害，伤害，危害；恶作剧，捣蛋，胡闹 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
104
outweigh
|
|
| vt.比...更重，...更重要 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
105
legitimate
|
|
| adj.合法的，合理的，合乎逻辑的；v.使合法 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
106
expunged
|
|
| v.擦掉( expunge的过去式和过去分词 )；除去；删去；消除 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
107
iota
|
|
| n.些微，一点儿 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
108
virtue
|
|
| n.德行，美德；贞操；优点；功效，效力 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
109
versed
|
|
| adj. 精通，熟练 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
110
humbly
|
|
| adv. 恭顺地，谦卑地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
111
entrusted
|
|
| v.委托，托付( entrust的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
112
obedience
|
|
| n.服从，顺从 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
113
binds
|
|
| v.约束( bind的第三人称单数 )；装订；捆绑；（用长布条）缠绕 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
114
undoubtedly
|
|
| adv.确实地，无疑地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
115
filthy
|
|
| adj.卑劣的；恶劣的，肮脏的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
116
thereby
|
|
| adv.因此，从而 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
117
considerably
|
|
| adv.极大地；相当大地；在很大程度上 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
118
enticement
|
|
| n.诱骗，诱人 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
119
remains
|
|
| n.剩余物，残留物；遗体，遗迹 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
120
perusal
|
|
| n.细读，熟读；目测 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
121
dispense
|
|
| vt.分配，分发；配(药)，发(药)；实施 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
122
celebrated
|
|
| adj.有名的，声誉卓著的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
123
requisite
|
|
| adj.需要的，必不可少的；n.必需品 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
124
perusing
|
|
| v.读（某篇文字）( peruse的现在分词 )；（尤指）细阅；审阅；匆匆读或心不在焉地浏览（某篇文字） | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
125
implore
|
|
| vt.乞求，恳求，哀求 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
126
humble
|
|
| adj.谦卑的，恭顺的；地位低下的；v.降低，贬低 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
127
posture
|
|
| n.姿势，姿态，心态，态度；v.作出某种姿势 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
128
havoc
|
|
| n.大破坏，浩劫，大混乱，大杂乱 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
129
hierarchy
|
|
| n.等级制度；统治集团，领导层 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
130
lawful
|
|
| adj.法律许可的，守法的，合法的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
131
veneration
|
|
| n.尊敬，崇拜 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
132
imbibe
|
|
| v.喝，饮；吸入，吸收 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
133
prerogative
|
|
| n.特权 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
134
supreme
|
|
| adj.极度的，最重要的；至高的，最高的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
135
guardians
|
|
| 监护人( guardian的名词复数 )； 保护者，维护者 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
136
dagger
|
|
| n.匕首，短剑，剑号 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
137
doctrines
|
|
| n.教条( doctrine的名词复数 )；教义；学说；（政府政策的）正式声明 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
138
propounded
|
|
| v.提出（问题、计划等）供考虑[讨论]，提议( propound的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
139
formerly
|
|
| adv.从前，以前 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
140
diligently
|
|
| ad.industriously;carefully | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
141
defense
|
|
| n.防御，保卫；[pl.]防务工事；辩护，答辩 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
142
pastors
|
|
| n.（基督教的）牧师( pastor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
143
pastor
|
|
| n.牧师，牧人 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
144
arduous
|
|
| adj.艰苦的，费力的，陡峭的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
145
odious
|
|
| adj.可憎的，讨厌的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
146
ascertain
|
|
| vt.发现，确定，查明，弄清 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
147
investigation
|
|
| n.调查，调查研究 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
148
ratify
|
|
| v.批准，认可，追认 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
149
detailed
|
|
| adj.详细的，详尽的，极注意细节的，完全的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
150
conscientiously
|
|
| adv.凭良心地；认真地，负责尽职地；老老实实 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
151
redeeming
|
|
| 补偿的，弥补的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
152
formulate
|
|
| v.用公式表示；规划；设计；系统地阐述 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
153
decided
|
|
| adj.决定了的，坚决的；明显的，明确的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
154
postponed
|
|
| vt.& vi.延期，缓办，（使）延迟vt.把…放在次要地位；[语]把…放在后面（或句尾）vi.（疟疾等）延缓发作（或复发） | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
155
maligning
|
|
| vt.污蔑，诽谤（malign的现在分词形式） | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
156
authorizes
|
|
| 授权，批准，委托( authorize的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
157
proceedings
|
|
| n.进程，过程，议程；诉讼(程序)；公报 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
158
antipathy
|
|
| n.憎恶；反感，引起反感的人或事物 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
159
submission
|
|
| n.服从，投降；温顺，谦虚；提出 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
160
enlisted
|
|
| adj.应募入伍的v.（使）入伍， （使）参军( enlist的过去式和过去分词 )；获得（帮助或支持） | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
161
secrecy
|
|
| n.秘密，保密，隐蔽 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
162
admonish
|
|
| v.训戒；警告；劝告 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
163
exhort
|
|
| v.规劝，告诫 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
164
accurately
|
|
| adv.准确地，精确地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
165
guilt
|
|
| n.犯罪；内疚；过失，罪责 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
166
incompetence
|
|
| n.不胜任，不称职 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
167
avowal
|
|
| n.公开宣称，坦白承认 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
168
esteem
|
|
| n.尊敬，尊重；vt.尊重，敬重；把…看作 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
169
straightforwardness
|
|
| n.坦白，率直 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
170
relinquish
|
|
| v.放弃，撤回，让与，放手 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
171
steadily
|
|
| adv.稳定地；不变地；持续地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
172
precisely
|
|
| adv.恰好，正好，精确地，细致地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
173
recur
|
|
| vi.复发，重现，再发生 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
174
credible
|
|
| adj.可信任的，可靠的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
175
pecuniary
|
|
| adj.金钱的；金钱上的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
176
inflicted
|
|
| 把…强加给，使承受，遭受( inflict的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
177
jurisdiction
|
|
| n.司法权，审判权，管辖权，控制权 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
178
unreasonable
|
|
| adj.不讲道理的，不合情理的，过度的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
179
penance
|
|
| n.（赎罪的）惩罪 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
180
consort
|
|
| v.相伴；结交 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
181
apprehension
|
|
| n.理解，领悟；逮捕，拘捕；忧虑 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
182
intentionally
|
|
| ad.故意地，有意地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
183
inclination
|
|
| n.倾斜；点头；弯腰；斜坡；倾度；倾向；爱好 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
184
tempted
|
|
| v.怂恿（某人）干不正当的事；冒…的险（tempt的过去分词） | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
185
delightful
|
|
| adj.令人高兴的，使人快乐的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
186
advertising
|
|
| n.广告业；广告活动 a.广告的；广告业务的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
187
prospective
|
|
| adj.预期的，未来的，前瞻性的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
188
immoral
|
|
| adj.不道德的，淫荡的，荒淫的，有伤风化的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
189
shun
|
|
| vt.避开，回避，避免 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
190
heed
|
|
| v.注意，留意；n.注意，留心 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
191
malice
|
|
| n.恶意，怨恨，蓄意；[律]预谋 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
192
apostasies
|
|
| n.背信，变节，叛教( apostasy的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
193
disciples
|
|
| n.信徒( disciple的名词复数 )；门徒；耶稣的信徒；（尤指）耶稣十二门徒之一 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
194
influential
|
|
| adj.有影响的，有权势的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
195
embittered
|
|
| v.使怨恨，激怒( embitter的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
196
hostility
|
|
| n.敌对，敌意；抵制［pl.］交战，战争 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
197
guardianship
|
|
| n. 监护, 保护, 守护 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
198
coterie
|
|
| n.(有共同兴趣的)小团体，小圈子 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
199
abstaining
|
|
| 戒（尤指酒），戒除( abstain的现在分词 )； 弃权（不投票） | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
200
exempted
|
|
| 使免除[豁免]( exempt的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
201
exemption
|
|
| n.豁免，免税额，免除 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
202
exempting
|
|
| 使免除[豁免]( exempt的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
203
pious
|
|
| adj.虔诚的；道貌岸然的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
204
implicitly
|
|
| adv. 含蓄地, 暗中地, 毫不保留地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
205
implicit
|
|
| a.暗示的，含蓄的，不明晰的，绝对的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
206
transgression
|
|
| n.违背；犯规；罪过 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
207
labored
|
|
| adj.吃力的，谨慎的v.努力争取(for)( labor的过去式和过去分词 )；苦干；详细分析；（指引擎）缓慢而困难地运转 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
208
formulating
|
|
| v.构想出( formulate的现在分词 )；规划；确切地阐述；用公式表示 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
209
spurn
|
|
| v.拒绝，摈弃；n.轻视的拒绝；踢开 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
210
axis
|
|
| n.轴，轴线，中心线；坐标轴，基准线 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
211
vindicate
|
|
| v.为…辩护或辩解，辩明；证明…正确 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
212
interpretation
|
|
| n.解释，说明，描述；艺术处理 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
213
sundry
|
|
| adj.各式各样的，种种的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
214
unanimity
|
|
| n.全体一致，一致同意 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
215
testimony
|
|
| n.证词；见证，证明 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
216
continental
|
|
| adj.大陆的，大陆性的，欧洲大陆的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
217
usurped
|
|
| 篡夺，霸占( usurp的过去式和过去分词 )； 盗用； 篡夺，篡权 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
218
forestry
|
|
| n.森林学；林业 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
219
severely
|
|
| adv.严格地；严厉地；非常恶劣地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
220
softened
|
|
| （使）变软( soften的过去式和过去分词 )； 缓解打击； 缓和； 安慰 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
221
scrupulously
|
|
| adv.一丝不苟地；小心翼翼地，多顾虑地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
222
incurred
|
|
| [医]招致的，遭受的； incur的过去式 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
223
antagonists
|
|
| 对立[对抗] 者，对手，敌手( antagonist的名词复数 )； 对抗肌； 对抗药 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
224
ascending
|
|
| adj.上升的，向上的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
225
eloquent
|
|
| adj.雄辩的，口才流利的；明白显示出的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
226
rumored
|
|
| adj.传说的，谣传的v.传闻( rumor的过去式和过去分词 )；[古]名誉；咕哝；[古]喧嚷 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
227
censuring
|
|
| v.指责，非难，谴责( censure的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
228
retraction
|
|
| n.撤消；收回 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
229
contravene
|
|
| v.违反，违背，反驳，反对 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
230
perfectly
|
|
| adv.完美地，无可非议地，彻底地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
| 欢迎访问英文小说网 |