This criticism of the modern type of righteous indignation must have come into many people's minds, I think, in reading Dr. Horton's eloquent9 expressions of disgust at the "corrupt10 Press," especially in connection with the Limerick craze. Upon the Limerick craze itself, I fear Dr. Horton will not have much effect; such fads11 perish before one has had time to kill them. But Dr. Horton's protest may really do good if it enables us to come to some clear understanding about what is really wrong with the popular Press, and which means it might be useful and which permissible12 to use for its reform. We do not want a censorship of the Press; but we are long past talking about that. At present it is not we that silence the Press; it is the Press that silences us. It is not a case of the Commonwealth14 settling how much the editors shall say; it is a case of the editors settling how much the Commonwealth shall know. If we attack the Press we shall be rebelling, not repressing. But shall we attack it?
Now it is just here that the chief difficulty occurs. It arises from the very rarity and rectitude of those minds which commonly inaugurate such crusades. I have the warmest respect for Dr. Horton's thirst after righteousness; but it has always seemed to me that his righteousness would be more effective without his refinement15. The curse of the Nonconformists is their universal refinement. They dimly connect being good with being delicate, and even dapper; with not being grotesque16 or loud or violent; with not sitting down on one's hat. Now it is always a pleasure to be loud and violent, and sometimes it is a duty. Certainly it has nothing to do with sin; a man can be loudly and violently virtuous—nay, he can be loudly and violently saintly, though that is not the type of saintliness that we recognise in Dr. Horton. And as for sitting on one's hat, if it is done for any sublime17 object (as, for instance, to amuse the children), it is obviously an act of very beautiful self-sacrifice, the destruction and surrender of the symbol of personal dignity upon the shrine18 of public festivity. Now it will not do to attack the modern editor merely for being unrefined, like the great mass of mankind. We must be able to say that he is immoral19, not that he is undignified or ridiculous. I do not mind the Yellow Press editor sitting on his hat. My only objection to him begins to dawn when he attempts to sit on my hat; or, indeed (as is at present the case), when he proceeds to sit on my head.
But in reading between the lines of Dr. Horton's invective20 one continually feels that he is not only angry with the popular Press for being unscrupulous: he is partly angry with the popular Press for being popular. He is not only irritated with Limericks for causing a mean money-scramble; he is also partly irritated with Limericks for being Limericks. The enormous size of the levity21 gets on his nerves, like the glare and blare of Bank Holiday. Now this is a motive22 which, however human and natural, must be strictly23 kept out of the way. It takes all sorts to make a world; and it is not in the least necessary that everybody should have that love of subtle and unobtrusive perfections in the matter of manners or literature which does often go with the type of the ethical24 idealist. It is not in the least desirable that everybody should be earnest. It is highly desirable that everybody should be honest, but that is a thing that can go quite easily with a coarse and cheerful character. But the ineffectualness of most protests against the abuse of the Press has been very largely due to the instinct of democracy (and the instinct of democracy is like the instinct of one woman, wild but quite right) that the people who were trying to purify the Press were also trying to refine it; and to this the democracy very naturally and very justly objected. We are justified25 in enforcing good morals, for they belong to all mankind; but we are not justified in enforcing good manners, for good manners always mean our own manners. We have no right to purge26 the popular Press of all that we think vulgar or trivial. Dr. Horton may possibly loathe27 and detest28 Limericks just as I loathe and detest riddles29; but I have no right to call them flippant and unprofitable; there are wild people in the world who like riddles. I am so afraid of this movement passing off into mere formless rhetoric30 and platform passion that I will even come close to the earth and lay down specifically some of the things that, in my opinion, could be, and ought to be, done to reform the Press.
First, I would make a law, if there is none such at present, by which an editor, proved to have published false news without reasonable verification, should simply go to prison. This is not a question of influences or atmospheres; the thing could be carried out as easily and as practically as the punishment of thieves and murderers. Of course there would be the usual statement that the guilt31 was that of a subordinate. Let the accused editor have the right of proving this if he can; if he does, let the subordinate be tried and go to prison. Two or three good rich editors and proprietors32 properly locked up would take the sting out of the Yellow Press better than centuries of Dr. Horton.
Second, it's impossible to pass over altogether the most unpleasant, but the most important part of this problem. I will deal with it as distantly as possible. I do not believe there is any harm whatever in reading about murders; rather, if anything, good; for the thought of death operates very powerfully with the poor in the creation of brotherhood33 and a sense of human dignity. I do not believe there is a pennyworth of harm in the police news, as such. Even divorce news, though contemptible34 enough, can really in most cases be left to the discretion35 of grown people; and how far children get hold of such things is a problem for the home and not for the nation. But there is a certain class of evils which a healthy man or woman can actually go through life without knowing anything about at all. These, I say, should be stamped and blackened out of every newspaper with the thickest black of the Russian censor13. Such cases should either be always tried in camera or reporting them should be a punishable offence. The common weakness of Nature and the sins that flesh is heir to we can leave people to find in newspapers. Men can safely see in the papers what they have already seen in the streets. They may safely find in their journals what they have already found in themselves. But we do not want the imaginations of rational and decent people clouded with the horrors of some obscene insanity36 which has no more to do with human life than the man in Bedlam37 who thinks he is a chicken. And, if this vile38 matter is admitted, let it be simply with a mention of the Latin or legal name of the crime, and with no details whatever. As it is, exactly the reverse is true. Papers are permitted to terrify and darken the fancy of the young with innumerable details, but not permitted to state in clean legal language what the thing is about. They are allowed to give any fact about the thing except the fact that it is a sin.
Third, I would do my best to introduce everywhere the practice of signed articles. Those who urge the advantages of anonymity39 are either people who do not realise the special peril40 of our time or they are people who are profiting by it. It is true, but futile41, for instance, to say that there is something noble in being nameless when a whole corporate42 body is bent43 on a consistent aim: as in an army or men building a cathedral. The point of modern newspapers is that there is no such corporate body and common aim; but each man can use the authority of the paper to further his own private fads and his own private finances.
点击收听单词发音
1 simplicity | |
n.简单,简易;朴素;直率,单纯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 pointed | |
adj.尖的,直截了当的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 mere | |
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 villains | |
n.恶棍( villain的名词复数 );罪犯;(小说、戏剧等中的)反面人物;淘气鬼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 frustrated | |
adj.挫败的,失意的,泄气的v.使不成功( frustrate的过去式和过去分词 );挫败;使受挫折;令人沮丧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 bribery | |
n.贿络行为,行贿,受贿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 illiterate | |
adj.文盲的;无知的;n.文盲 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 exquisite | |
adj.精美的;敏锐的;剧烈的,感觉强烈的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 eloquent | |
adj.雄辩的,口才流利的;明白显示出的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 corrupt | |
v.贿赂,收买;adj.腐败的,贪污的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 fads | |
n.一时的流行,一时的风尚( fad的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 permissible | |
adj.可允许的,许可的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 censor | |
n./vt.审查,审查员;删改 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 commonwealth | |
n.共和国,联邦,共同体 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 refinement | |
n.文雅;高尚;精美;精制;精炼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 grotesque | |
adj.怪诞的,丑陋的;n.怪诞的图案,怪人(物) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 sublime | |
adj.崇高的,伟大的;极度的,不顾后果的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 shrine | |
n.圣地,神龛,庙;v.将...置于神龛内,把...奉为神圣 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 immoral | |
adj.不道德的,淫荡的,荒淫的,有伤风化的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 invective | |
n.痛骂,恶意抨击 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 levity | |
n.轻率,轻浮,不稳定,多变 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 motive | |
n.动机,目的;adv.发动的,运动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 strictly | |
adv.严厉地,严格地;严密地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 ethical | |
adj.伦理的,道德的,合乎道德的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 justified | |
a.正当的,有理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 purge | |
n.整肃,清除,泻药,净化;vt.净化,清除,摆脱;vi.清除,通便,腹泻,变得清洁 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 loathe | |
v.厌恶,嫌恶 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 detest | |
vt.痛恨,憎恶 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 riddles | |
n.谜(语)( riddle的名词复数 );猜不透的难题,难解之谜 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 rhetoric | |
n.修辞学,浮夸之言语 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 guilt | |
n.犯罪;内疚;过失,罪责 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 proprietors | |
n.所有人,业主( proprietor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 brotherhood | |
n.兄弟般的关系,手中情谊 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 contemptible | |
adj.可鄙的,可轻视的,卑劣的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 discretion | |
n.谨慎;随意处理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 insanity | |
n.疯狂,精神错乱;极端的愚蠢,荒唐 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 bedlam | |
n.混乱,骚乱;疯人院 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 vile | |
adj.卑鄙的,可耻的,邪恶的;坏透的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 anonymity | |
n.the condition of being anonymous | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 peril | |
n.(严重的)危险;危险的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 futile | |
adj.无效的,无用的,无希望的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 corporate | |
adj.共同的,全体的;公司的,企业的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 bent | |
n.爱好,癖好;adj.弯的;决心的,一心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |