I think seriously, on the whole, that the more serious is the discussion the more grotesque should be the terms. For this, as I say, there is an evident reason. For a subject is really solemn and important in so far as it applies to the whole cosmos9, or to some great spheres and cycles of experience at least. So far as a thing is universal it is serious. And so far as a thing is universal it is full of comic things. If you take a small thing, it may be entirely10 serious: Napoleon, for instance, was a small thing, and he was serious: the same applies to microbes. If you isolate11 a thing, you may get the pure essence of gravity. But if you take a large thing (such as the Solar System) it must be comic, at least in parts. The germs are serious, because they kill you. But the stars are funny, because they give birth to life, and life gives birth to fun. If you have, let us say, a theory about man, and if you can only prove it by talking about Plato and George Washington, your theory may be a quite frivolous12 thing. But if you can prove it by talking about the butler or the postman, then it is serious, because it is universal. So far from it being irreverent to use silly metaphors13 on serious questions, it is one's duty to use silly metaphors on serious questions. It is the test of one's seriousness. It is the test of a responsible religion or theory whether it can take examples from pots and pans and boots and butter-tubs. It is the test of a good philosophy whether you can defend it grotesquely14. It is the test of a good religion whether you can joke about it.
When I was a very young journalist I used to be irritated at a peculiar15 habit of printers, a habit which most persons of a tendency similar to mine have probably noticed also. It goes along with the fixed16 belief of printers that to be a Rationalist is the same thing as to be a Nationalist. I mean the printer's tendency to turn the word "cosmic" into the word "comic." It annoyed me at the time. But since then I have come to the conclusion that the printers were right. The democracy is always right. Whatever is cosmic is comic.
Moreover, there is another reason that makes it almost inevitable17 that we should defend grotesquely what we believe seriously. It is that all grotesqueness18 is itself intimately related to seriousness. Unless a thing is dignified19, it cannot be undignified. Why is it funny that a man should sit down suddenly in the street? There is only one possible or intelligent reason: that man is the image of God. It is not funny that anything else should fall down; only that a man should fall down. No one sees anything funny in a tree falling down. No one sees a delicate absurdity20 in a stone falling down. No man stops in the road and roars with laughter at the sight of the snow coming down. The fall of thunderbolts is treated with some gravity. The fall of roofs and high buildings is taken seriously. It is only when a man tumbles down that we laugh. Why do we laugh? Because it is a grave religious matter: it is the Fall of Man. Only man can be absurd: for only man can be dignified.
The above, which occupies the great part of my article, is a parenthises. It is time that I returned to my choleric21 correspondent who rebuked22 me for being too frivolous about the problem of Spiritualism. My correspondent, who is evidently an intelligent man, is very angry with me indeed. He uses the strongest language. He says I remind him of a brother of his: which seems to open an abyss or vista23 of infamy24. The main substance of his attack resolves itself into two propositions. First, he asks me what right I have to talk about Spiritualism at all, as I admit I have never been to a séance. This is all very well, but there are a good many things to which I have never been, but I have not the smallest intention of leaving off talking about them. I refuse (for instance) to leave off talking about the Siege of Troy. I decline to be mute in the matter of the French Revolution. I will not be silenced on the late indefensible assassination25 of Julius Cæsar. If nobody has any right to judge of Spiritualism except a man who has been to a séance, the results, logically speaking, are rather serious: it would almost seem as if nobody had any right to judge of Christianity who had not been to the first meeting at Pentecost. Which would be dreadful. I conceive myself capable of forming my opinion of Spiritualism without seeing spirits, just as I form my opinion of the Japanese War without seeing the Japanese, or my opinion of American millionaires without (thank God) seeing an American millionaire. Blessed are they who have not seen and yet have believed: a passage which some have considered as a prophecy of modern journalism26.
But my correspondent's second objection is more important. He charges me with actually ignoring the value of communication (if it exists) between this world and the next. I do not ignore it. But I do say this—That a different principle attaches to investigation27 in this spiritual field from investigation in any other. If a man baits a line for fish, the fish will come, even if he declares there are no such things as fishes. If a man limes a twig28 for birds, the birds will be caught, even if he thinks it superstitious29 to believe in birds at all. But a man cannot bait a line for souls. A man cannot lime a twig to catch gods. All wise schools have agreed that this latter capture depends to some extent on the faith of the capturer. So it comes to this: If you have no faith in the spirits your appeal is in vain; and if you have—is it needed? If you do not believe, you cannot. If you do—you will not.
That is the real distinction between investigation in this department and investigation in any other. The priest calls to the goddess, for the same reason that a man calls to his wife, because he knows she is there. If a man kept on shouting out very loud the single word "Maria," merely with the object of discovering whether if he did it long enough some woman of that name would come and marry him, he would be more or less in the position of the modern spiritualist. The old religionist cried out for his God. The new religionist cries out for some god to be his. The whole point of religion as it has hitherto existed in the world was that you knew all about your gods, even before you saw them, if indeed you ever did. Spiritualism seems to me absolutely right on all its mystical side. The supernatural part of it seems to me quite natural. The incredible part of it seems to me obviously true. But I think it so far dangerous or unsatisfactory that it is in some degree scientific. It inquires whether its gods are worth inquiring into. A man (of a certain age) may look into the eyes of his lady-love to see that they are beautiful. But no normal lady will allow that young man to look into her eyes to see whether they are beautiful. The same vanity and idiosyncrasy has been generally observed in gods. Praise them; or leave them alone; but do not look for them unless you know they are there. Do not look for them unless you want them. It annoys them very much.
点击收听单词发音
1 flippancy | |
n.轻率;浮躁;无礼的行动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 justify | |
vt.证明…正当(或有理),为…辩护 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 controversies | |
争论 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 grotesque | |
adj.怪诞的,丑陋的;n.怪诞的图案,怪人(物) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 exponent | |
n.倡导者,拥护者;代表人物;指数,幂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 bishops | |
(基督教某些教派管辖大教区的)主教( bishop的名词复数 ); (国际象棋的)象 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 minor | |
adj.较小(少)的,较次要的;n.辅修学科;vi.辅修 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 philosophical | |
adj.哲学家的,哲学上的,达观的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 cosmos | |
n.宇宙;秩序,和谐 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 isolate | |
vt.使孤立,隔离 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 frivolous | |
adj.轻薄的;轻率的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 metaphors | |
隐喻( metaphor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 grotesquely | |
adv. 奇异地,荒诞地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 peculiar | |
adj.古怪的,异常的;特殊的,特有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 fixed | |
adj.固定的,不变的,准备好的;(计算机)固定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 inevitable | |
adj.不可避免的,必然发生的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 grotesqueness | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 dignified | |
a.可敬的,高贵的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 absurdity | |
n.荒谬,愚蠢;谬论 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 choleric | |
adj.易怒的,性情暴躁的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 rebuked | |
责难或指责( rebuke的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 vista | |
n.远景,深景,展望,回想 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 infamy | |
n.声名狼藉,出丑,恶行 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 assassination | |
n.暗杀;暗杀事件 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 journalism | |
n.新闻工作,报业 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 investigation | |
n.调查,调查研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 twig | |
n.小树枝,嫩枝;v.理解 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 superstitious | |
adj.迷信的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |