Often the unthinking lay hold of a catch-word or a pet phrase and repeat and write it, as if it were the last word in social science and philosophy. General Grant, when president, stumbled on such a silly combination of words, and surface-thinkers have been repeating it ever since, simply because it sounds wise and pat. Grant once said that, "The way to repeal4 a bad law is to enforce it." Grant was not a statesman nor a philosopher. He was a soldier. He probably heard some one use this phrase, and it sounded good to him. Out of that has grown the further statement which courts and prosecutors6 have used to excuse themselves for the cruelty of enforcing a law that does violence to the feelings of the people. This statement is to the effect that so long as the law is on the books, it is the duty of officers to enforce it. The smallest investigation7 of the philosophy of law shows how silly and reactionary8 such statements are.
One thing should be remembered. Laws really come from the habits, customs and feelings of the people, as interpreted or understood by legislative9 bodies. When these habits and customs are old enough they become the folk-ways of the people. Legislatures and courts only write them down. When the folk-ways change the laws change, even though no legislature or judge has recorded their repeal.
Since Professor Sumner of Yale University wrote his important book, "Folkways," there is no excuse for any student not knowing that this statement is true. As a matter of fact, no court ever enforced all the written laws, or ever would, or ever could. Only a part of the discarded criminal law is ever repealed by other laws. The rest dies from neglect and lack of use. It is like the rudimentary parts of the human anatomy10. Man's body is filled with rudimentary muscles and nerves that, in the past, served a purpose. These were never removed by operations, but died from disuse. Every criminal code is filled with obsolete11 laws, some of them entirely12 dead, others in the course of dissolution. They cannot be repealed by statute so long as an active minority insists that they remain on the books. When the great mass no longer wants them, it is useless to take the trouble to repeal them. The fugitive13 slave law was never believed in and never obeyed, and it was openly violated and defied by the great mass of the people of the North. The Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments14 to the Federal Constitution, and the statutes15 passed to enforce them, providing political and civil equality for the black man, and forbidding discrimination on railroads, in hotels, restaurants, theatres and all public places, have never really been the law in any state in the union. Their provisions have always been openly violated and no court would think of enforcing them, for the simple reason that public sentiment is against it. Laws condemning16 witchcraft17 and sorcery both in Europe and America did their deadly work and died, for the most part, without repeal. Sabbath laws of all sorts forbidding work and play and amusements are dead letters on the statute books of most states, in spite of many attempts to galvanize them into life. All kinds of revenue laws are openly violated. Most tax-payers of intelligence who own property violate the revenue law openly and notoriously, and all courts and officers as well as the public know it. Many laws which interfere18 with the habits, customs and beliefs of a large number of people, like the prohibition19 laws, never receive the assent20 of so large a percentage as to make people conscious of any wrong in violating them, and therefore people break them when they can. Often this class of laws is enforced upon offenders21 who believe the law is an unwarrantable interference with their rights, and thus causes convictions where no moral turpitude22 is felt.
Every new crusade against crime not only sweeps away a large amount of work that has been slowly and patiently done toward a right understanding of crime, but likewise puts new statutes on the books which would not be placed there if the public were sane23. When it does not do this, it increases penalties which work evil in other directions and awe24 courts, juries, governors and pardon boards, not only preventing them from listening to the voice of humanity and justice, but causing them to deny substantial rights and wreak25 vengeance26 and cruelty upon the weak and helpless.
点击收听单词发音
1 penal | |
adj.刑罚的;刑法上的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 statute | |
n.成文法,法令,法规;章程,规则,条例 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 repealed | |
撤销,废除( repeal的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 repeal | |
n.废止,撤消;v.废止,撤消 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 mischievous | |
adj.调皮的,恶作剧的,有害的,伤人的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 prosecutors | |
检举人( prosecutor的名词复数 ); 告发人; 起诉人; 公诉人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 investigation | |
n.调查,调查研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 reactionary | |
n.反动者,反动主义者;adj.反动的,反动主义的,反对改革的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 legislative | |
n.立法机构,立法权;adj.立法的,有立法权的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 anatomy | |
n.解剖学,解剖;功能,结构,组织 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 obsolete | |
adj.已废弃的,过时的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 fugitive | |
adj.逃亡的,易逝的;n.逃犯,逃亡者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 amendments | |
(法律、文件的)改动( amendment的名词复数 ); 修正案; 修改; (美国宪法的)修正案 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 statutes | |
成文法( statute的名词复数 ); 法令; 法规; 章程 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 condemning | |
v.(通常因道义上的原因而)谴责( condemn的现在分词 );宣判;宣布…不能使用;迫使…陷于不幸的境地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 witchcraft | |
n.魔法,巫术 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 interfere | |
v.(in)干涉,干预;(with)妨碍,打扰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 prohibition | |
n.禁止;禁令,禁律 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 assent | |
v.批准,认可;n.批准,认可 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 offenders | |
n.冒犯者( offender的名词复数 );犯规者;罪犯;妨害…的人(或事物) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 turpitude | |
n.可耻;邪恶 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 sane | |
adj.心智健全的,神志清醒的,明智的,稳健的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 awe | |
n.敬畏,惊惧;vt.使敬畏,使惊惧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 wreak | |
v.发泄;报复 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 vengeance | |
n.报复,报仇,复仇 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |