Were the Dissenters2 of this country to abstain4 from all interference in “contested elections,” and to leave both church and state to the care of others, such a course of proceeding5 might be very agreeable to Mr. Perowne, but I question whether it would be serviceable to civil and religious liberty. If, however, there be any guilt6 in this matter, it does not lie exclusively at the door of nonconformist “teachers and members,” and when Mr. P. offers to feel their pulse, and to write out prescriptions7 for them, he ought to remember p. 21the proverb, “Physician heal thyself.” Party politics have, I confess, no charms for me; and I very earnestly desire that all religious men who come in contact with them, whether Church-people or Dissenters, may so conduct themselves as to give no “occasion to the enemies of God to blaspheme.”
Utterly8 forgetful of the strife9 which is often manifested at the “vestry meetings” of his own church, he ventures to attack our “church meetings,” at which, he says, “peaceful and loving scenes sometimes take place.” I dare say that if Mr. Perowne knew much of the history of “church meetings,” from those which were held in Corinth, during the apostolic times, down to our own days, he might tell of some in which peace and love were not very apparent. A thinking mind will perceive, however, that an ecclesiastical system may be good in itself, and even divine in its origin, as that at Corinth was, and yet it may be very imperfectly and improperly10 exhibited and administered by human beings. In such a case the fault is not in the system, but in the men. But whatever exceptions to peace and love may have occasionally appeared in our church meetings, I deny that Mr. Perowne’s description is applicable to their general character. Our churches are formed on the principle that none but those who profess11 and practise the gospel of Christ are eligible12 for membership; and when any person of contrary character is discovered among us, he is excluded from the society, and, as a matter of course, falls into the Establishment. Taking them with all their imperfections, I believe not only that they are formed according to the apostolic model, but that they are among the best societies of men to be found in this sinful world—“and no man shall stop me of p. 22this boasting” on their behalf. The church of which I am the pastor13, was formed about sixteen years ago. It then contained thirteen members, and since then between three and four hundred have been added. Our church meetings are held monthly, for the purposes of devotion, of receiving additional members, and, occasionally, for the transaction of business, necessary to preserve the order and purity of the church. I do not, of course, expect that Mr. Perowne will believe my testimony14 on this subject, but I confidently appeal to the members of my church for evidence respecting the character of our meetings. Those “hallowed influences,” to which Mr. Perowne so contemptuously refers, have abundantly blessed them, nor do I expect to witness any scenes more truly “peaceful and loving,” till “the general assembly and church of the first born” appears in heaven.
Another charge, which Mr. Perowne vehemently15 urges against Dissenters, is that they are aiming to destroy the church to which he belongs. “The leading organs of dissent1,” says he, “openly avow16 that nothing but the destruction of our church will satisfy them.” I should think my own church destroyed, if it were to be overrun with infidelity or heresy17, or if it were to be broken up and dispersed18 as a society of Christians19. But, as Mr. Perowne is acquainted with “the leading organs of dissent,” he knows very well that Dissenters have no desire to see the Church of England brought into such a condition; and that all they wish is that the Established Church would support its own ministers, and pay its own expenses, without taxing other churches. And this, if I understand him rightly, he would call “the destruction of the church.” If so, all the dissenting21 churches are destroyed p. 23already. They have no connection with the state, as a controlling power—they choose their own ministers—and they pay their own expenses. They are therefore, according to Mr. Perowne, in a state of “destruction”—they are “things which are not,” and he may perhaps be aware that such things are sometimes employed “to bring to nought22 things which are.”
But the wholesale23 charge which he brings against the Nonconformists is, that their system “leads men to tear in pieces the body of Christ—to set at nought the powers that be—to speak evil of dignities—to imbibe24 and inculcate a disloyal, republican, revolutionary spirit.” And he might have added, with equal truth, that it is productive of hydrophobia, that it brought the cholera25 into the country a short time ago, and that it turned all the members of our churches into cannibals. Charges such as he has brought, false and ridiculous as they are, have been incessantly26 repeated since the day when the Head of our churches was himself reviled28 by the priests, as “a fellow perverting29 the nation, and forbidding to give tribute to Cæsar.” And they will no doubt continue to be repeated, till “the accuser of the brethren is cast out.” They are always freely used by those who find it more convenient to revile27 than to argue; and they are as useful to such persons, as the broken lantern was to the watchman, who always kept it by him to exhibit as a proof that his victims had been guilty of a riot.
I now proceed to select some specimens30 of the manner in which he has perverted31 the language of my letter, and also some specimens of the literature and logic32 with which his “Observations” are interspersed33.
Alluding34 to the title of my letter he asks, “What p. 24right a Dissenter3 has to remonstrate35 with the members of the church, on any steps they think proper to take with regard to the education of the children belonging to their own communion?” The proper answer to this question is, that I had no right at all to remonstrate on such a subject. But what will the reader think, when I tell him that I never did remonstrate on such a subject, and that Mr. Perowne’s apparent object in giving such a form to his question is to excite a prejudice against my Letter at the very beginning of his “Observations.” He knows that the Infant Schools, which the members of the Establishment projected, were not for “the education of children belonging to their own communion,” but for “the children of persons of all denominations36.” And he knows that my remonstrance37 was directed against those who wished to make the members of one church the Instructors38 of Infants, to the exclusion39 of the members of all other churches. The artifice40 which he has adopted may have answered the purpose which he had in view, but it is not the result of an upright and honourable41 mind, and it manifests much more of the subtilty of the serpent than of the harmlessness of the dove.
Mr. Perowne, having remarked that I had advised the Establishment to act on “the principles on which the Infant Schools in Norwich have hitherto been conducted,” asks, “What are those principles?” And professing42 to gather his reply from my Letter, he answers, “That the Dissenters should have the chief management of them,” while “the members of the Established Church, afford help in directing the concerns, and in defraying the expenses.” Such “counsel,” I admit, is as impertinent as to deny to p. 25Churchmen the right “to educate the children belonging to their own communion.” But I never gave such counsel; and Mr. Perowne’s interpretation43 of my language is both unjust and absurd. The statement in my letter is this. The committees of the Infant Schools “are composed of members of the Establishment and of other Christian20 churches”—and, as it respects the school in St. Miles’, “repeated efforts have been made to induce members of the Established Church to afford greater help in directing its concerns, as well as in defraying its expenses.” Now mark the injustice44 of my commentator45. In professing to quote my language, he leaves out the word “greater,” which is an important word in the sentence, and then he tells his readers that my counsel is “that the Dissenters should have the chief management of the schools” about to be instituted. And now mark his reasoning. The Dissenters have made repeated efforts to induce Churchmen “to afford greater help in directing the schools;” therefore Dissenters desire to have “the chief management of them!” Admirable logic! If “a supposed second Solomon” be needed in the schools of Dissent, no such prodigy46 is required in the Establishment. Her “mountains have laboured,” and her Solomon is born!
点击收听单词发音
1 dissent | |
n./v.不同意,持异议 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 dissenters | |
n.持异议者,持不同意见者( dissenter的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 dissenter | |
n.反对者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 abstain | |
v.自制,戒绝,弃权,避免 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 proceeding | |
n.行动,进行,(pl.)会议录,学报 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 guilt | |
n.犯罪;内疚;过失,罪责 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 prescriptions | |
药( prescription的名词复数 ); 处方; 开处方; 计划 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 utterly | |
adv.完全地,绝对地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 strife | |
n.争吵,冲突,倾轧,竞争 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 improperly | |
不正确地,不适当地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 profess | |
v.声称,冒称,以...为业,正式接受入教,表明信仰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 eligible | |
adj.有条件被选中的;(尤指婚姻等)合适(意)的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 pastor | |
n.牧师,牧人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 testimony | |
n.证词;见证,证明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 vehemently | |
adv. 热烈地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 avow | |
v.承认,公开宣称 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 heresy | |
n.异端邪说;异教 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 dispersed | |
adj. 被驱散的, 被分散的, 散布的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 Christians | |
n.基督教徒( Christian的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 Christian | |
adj.基督教徒的;n.基督教徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 dissenting | |
adj.不同意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 nought | |
n./adj.无,零 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 wholesale | |
n.批发;adv.以批发方式;vt.批发,成批出售 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 imbibe | |
v.喝,饮;吸入,吸收 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 cholera | |
n.霍乱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 incessantly | |
ad.不停地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 revile | |
v.辱骂,谩骂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 reviled | |
v.辱骂,痛斥( revile的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 perverting | |
v.滥用( pervert的现在分词 );腐蚀;败坏;使堕落 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 specimens | |
n.样品( specimen的名词复数 );范例;(化验的)抽样;某种类型的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 perverted | |
adj.不正当的v.滥用( pervert的过去式和过去分词 );腐蚀;败坏;使堕落 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 logic | |
n.逻辑(学);逻辑性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 interspersed | |
adj.[医]散开的;点缀的v.intersperse的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 alluding | |
提及,暗指( allude的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 remonstrate | |
v.抗议,规劝 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 denominations | |
n.宗派( denomination的名词复数 );教派;面额;名称 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 remonstrance | |
n抗议,抱怨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 instructors | |
指导者,教师( instructor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 exclusion | |
n.拒绝,排除,排斥,远足,远途旅行 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 artifice | |
n.妙计,高明的手段;狡诈,诡计 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 honourable | |
adj.可敬的;荣誉的,光荣的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 professing | |
声称( profess的现在分词 ); 宣称; 公开表明; 信奉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 interpretation | |
n.解释,说明,描述;艺术处理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 injustice | |
n.非正义,不公正,不公平,侵犯(别人的)权利 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 commentator | |
n.注释者,解说者;实况广播评论员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 prodigy | |
n.惊人的事物,奇迹,神童,天才,预兆 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |