In the course of this immortal5 paragraph, two things yet remain to be briefly6 noticed. First, he charges me with uttering a direct falsehood, and says that he will not believe my statements unless they are “authenticated by at least two witnesses.” I have already intimated that I shall not trouble myself to gain his assent7 to any statements I have made. He had before him the speeches made at the public meeting; he had before him Mr. Geary’s pamphlet; in both of which the statements I have made are reiterated8; and yet, though he had before him the testimony9 of these three or four witnesses, he says he will not believe, till he has “at least two witnesses.” Let him disbelieve it then. And, secondly10, in his note to the paragraph, he charges some of the clergy11 with consenting to “unite with Dissenters in the Bible Society,” “on condition” that a Dissenter4 should pay their subscriptions12. I hope it is distinctly understood that, in these pages, I make no attack upon the clergy, and that I have to do with Mr. Perowne only; yet, though the clergy do not need me as their defender13, I am bound to declare that, having associated with several of them in the Bible Society for nearly twenty years, I believe that they joined it from true conviction, and not from such a base and paltry14 “condition” as that which Mr. Perowne alleges15. He has, however, carefully abstained16 from mentioning names, and from advancing proofs, both of which p. 33ought to have accompanied such a disreputable accusation17 of his brethren.
The bishops18, of whom he speaks in the next paragraph, were “immured in a prison” on a charge of high treason; and a bill, to exclude them from the House of Lords, passed both houses of parliament, and received the signature of “our martyred Charles.” And, if it was ever “made unlawful for an Episcopalian to worship God according to the dictates19 of his own conscience,” Mr. Perowne ought to know that this was done by parliamentary authority, and that the church might even now visit every Dissenter with pains and penalties, for not worshipping within her walls, were she not mercifully prevented by the Act of Toleration.
One more paragraph yet remains20. I had said in my Letter, that “the essential doctrines21 and hallowed influences” of religion “ought to be far dearer to us all than any forms of ecclesiastical government. For the kingdom of God is not meat and drink; but righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost.” This, he intimates, is equivalent to saying that “forms of ecclesiastical government” are “matters of little moment.” I did not say so. I said that doctrines and influences ought to be “far dearer” to us than such forms. Having, however, made me say that they are “matters of little moment,” he asks, why then do we separate from the church? I ask in reply, why does the church impose them? and why does he write a pamphlet against those who conscientiously22 refuse to comply with them? Let Mr. Perowne regenerate23 a child by baptism, and cross its forehead, if he pleases. Let him kneel at the table, around which Christ and his disciples24 sat, if he pleases. Let him call a Socinian p. 34his “dear brother,” and bury him “in sure and certain hope of the resurrection to eternal life,” if he pleases. But let him not attempt to compel me to adopt such practices; let him not anathematize me for not conforming to a church which declares that it “hath power to decree rites25 and ceremonies,” when I believe that such “power” is possessed26 by Christ alone. I am not the separatist. I “stand fast in the liberty with which Christ hath made me free.” He is the schismatic who insists upon the practice of unscriptural and popish ceremonies, as the terms of communion with the church of Christ. “The schism27,” says Archbishop Laud28, in addressing Papists, and in justifying29 the church of England in her dissent2 from the church of Rome, “The schism is theirs whose the cause of it is; and he makes the separation who gives the first cause of it, not he that makes an actual separation upon a just cause preceding.” Let Mr. Perowne talk no more about separation, but remember that “those who live in a house of glass should never throw stones.”
Mr. Perowne denounces the application which I have made of the passage of Scripture30, which I quoted for the purpose of illustration. “I did not before know,” says he, “that ‘forms of ecclesiastical government,’ and ‘meat and drink’ were synonimous terms.” And what of that? There are many things which Mr. Perowne does not know. He does not know, for instance, how to spell synonymous, and until he has learned that, I shall not undertake to instruct him in higher matters.
Several of the extracts which I have made, from the observations in this wretched pamphlet, place the writer of them in a most unfortunate predicament. p. 35He either believes that his interpretations31 of my language are the true meaning, or he does not so believe. In the former case, his “Observations” manifest a want of sense; in the latter case, a want of honesty. It is impossible to go through his pamphlet without lamenting32 over the condition of a church which is compelled to submit to such incompetent33 or unprincipled instructors34. What must be the follies35 or fanaticism36 of disciples who are taught to explain passages of Scripture on the principles on which “this true son of the church” has explained my Letter. This, however, is a subject on which we are not left to mere37 conjecture38. In the volume which contains some of the “Sermons” with which Mr. Perowne has edified39 his flock, he teaches that Jesus Christ is shortly coming in person to reign40 in Jerusalem—that the saints will be raised from the dead, at least a thousand years before the general resurrection, for the purpose of reigning41 together with Christ—that Jerusalem will be to them “what Windsor castle is to our king and his family”—and that they will have “various enjoyments42 through the medium of the senses,” “meat and drink” included. He also declares, “I have said nothing of the new division of the Holy land, of the rebuilding of the Temple, or of the re-institution of the Temple service; THOUGH ALL THIS WILL CERTAINLY TAKE PLACE!!” There now. Let any Irvingite or Swedenborgian beat that if he can. And let all Dissenters take joyfully43 the abuse which Mr. Perowne has heaped upon them, so long as the law tolerates them in leaving St. John’s Maddermarket, in order to be instructed by those who “understand what they say, and whereof they affirm.”
I have now done with “The Reverend John Perowne, Rector of St. John’s Maddermarket, Norwich.” I have examined his reasonings. I have corrected his mistakes. I have exposed his misrepresentations. In so doing I have endeavoured to comply with the motto which he has inserted in his title page, and to “MARK them which cause divisions and offences;” and I now retire from the study of his “Observations,” deeply impressed with the conviction, that fallen indeed must that cause be, which either needs, or accepts such a defender.
点击收听单词发音
1 Oxford | |
n.牛津(英国城市) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 dissent | |
n./v.不同意,持异议 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 dissenters | |
n.持异议者,持不同意见者( dissenter的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 dissenter | |
n.反对者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 immortal | |
adj.不朽的;永生的,不死的;神的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 briefly | |
adv.简单地,简短地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 assent | |
v.批准,认可;n.批准,认可 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 reiterated | |
反复地说,重申( reiterate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 testimony | |
n.证词;见证,证明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 secondly | |
adv.第二,其次 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 clergy | |
n.[总称]牧师,神职人员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 subscriptions | |
n.(报刊等的)订阅费( subscription的名词复数 );捐款;(俱乐部的)会员费;捐助 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 defender | |
n.保卫者,拥护者,辩护人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 paltry | |
adj.无价值的,微不足道的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 alleges | |
断言,宣称,辩解( allege的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 abstained | |
v.戒(尤指酒),戒除( abstain的过去式和过去分词 );弃权(不投票) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 accusation | |
n.控告,指责,谴责 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 bishops | |
(基督教某些教派管辖大教区的)主教( bishop的名词复数 ); (国际象棋的)象 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 dictates | |
n.命令,规定,要求( dictate的名词复数 )v.大声讲或读( dictate的第三人称单数 );口授;支配;摆布 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 doctrines | |
n.教条( doctrine的名词复数 );教义;学说;(政府政策的)正式声明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 conscientiously | |
adv.凭良心地;认真地,负责尽职地;老老实实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 regenerate | |
vt.使恢复,使新生;vi.恢复,再生;adj.恢复的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 disciples | |
n.信徒( disciple的名词复数 );门徒;耶稣的信徒;(尤指)耶稣十二门徒之一 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 rites | |
仪式,典礼( rite的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 possessed | |
adj.疯狂的;拥有的,占有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 schism | |
n.分派,派系,分裂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 laud | |
n.颂歌;v.赞美 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 justifying | |
证明…有理( justify的现在分词 ); 为…辩护; 对…作出解释; 为…辩解(或辩护) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 scripture | |
n.经文,圣书,手稿;Scripture:(常用复数)《圣经》,《圣经》中的一段 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 interpretations | |
n.解释( interpretation的名词复数 );表演;演绎;理解 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 lamenting | |
adj.悲伤的,悲哀的v.(为…)哀悼,痛哭,悲伤( lament的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 incompetent | |
adj.无能力的,不能胜任的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 instructors | |
指导者,教师( instructor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 follies | |
罪恶,时事讽刺剧; 愚蠢,蠢笨,愚蠢的行为、思想或做法( folly的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 fanaticism | |
n.狂热,盲信 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 mere | |
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 conjecture | |
n./v.推测,猜测 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 edified | |
v.开导,启发( edify的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 reign | |
n.统治时期,统治,支配,盛行;v.占优势 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 reigning | |
adj.统治的,起支配作用的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 enjoyments | |
愉快( enjoyment的名词复数 ); 令人愉快的事物; 享有; 享受 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 joyfully | |
adv. 喜悦地, 高兴地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |