WHEN first the idea became widely spread among men that the Word of God, instead of being truly the foundation of all existing institutions, was rather a stone which the builders had rejected, it was but natural that the consequent havoc2 among received opinions should be accompanied by the generation of many new and lively hopes for the future. Somewhat as in the early days of the French Revolution, men must have looked for an immediate3 and universal improvement in their condition. Christianity, up to that time, had been somewhat of a failure politically. The reason was now obvious, the capital flaw was detected, the sickness of the body politic5 traced at last to its efficient cause. It was only necessary to put the Bible thoroughly6 into practice, to set themselves strenuously7 to realise in life the Holy Commonwealth8, and all abuses and iniquities9 would surely pass away. Thus, in a pageant10 played at Geneva in the year 1523, the world was represented as a sick man at the end of his wits for help, to whom his doctor recommends Lutheran specifics. 60 The Reformers themselves had set their affections in a different world, and professed11 to look for the finished result of their endeavours on the other side of death. They took no interest in politics as such; they even condemned13 political action as Antichristian: notably14, Luther in the case of the Peasants’ War. And yet, as the purely15 religious question was inseparably complicated with political difficulties, and they had to make opposition16, from day to day, against principalities and powers, they were led, one after another, and again and again, to leave the sphere which was more strictly17 their own, and meddle18, for good and evil, with the affairs of State. Not much was to be expected from interference in such a spirit. Whenever a minister found himself galled20 or hindered, he would be inclined to suppose some contravention of the Bible. Whenever Christian4 liberty was restrained (and Christian liberty for each individual would be about coextensive with what he wished to do), it was obvious that the State was Antichristian. The great thing, and the one thing, was to push the Gospel and the Reformers’ own interpretation21 of it. Whatever helped was good; whatever hindered was evil; and if this simple classification proved inapplicable over the whole field, it was no business of his to stop and reconcile incongruities22. He had more pressing concerns on hand; he had to save souls; he had to be about his Father’s business. This short-sighted view resulted in a doctrine23 that was actually Jesuitical in application. They had no serious ideas upon politics, and they were ready, nay24, they seemed almost bound, to adopt and support whichever ensured for the moment the greatest benefit to the souls of their fellow-men. They were dishonest in all sincerity25. Thus Labitte, in the introduction to a book 61 in which he exposes the hypocritical democracy of the Catholics under the League, steps aside for a moment to stigmatise the hypocritical democracy of the Protestants. And nowhere was this expediency26 in political questions more apparent than about the question of female sovereignty. So much was this the case that one James Thomasius, of Leipsic, wrote a little paper 62 about the religious partialities of those who took part in the controversy, in which some of these learned disputants cut a very sorry figure.
60 Gaberel’s EGLIST DE GENEVE, i. 88.
61 LA DEMOCRATIE CHEZ LES PREDICATEURS DE LA LIGUE.
62 HISTORIA AFFECTUUM SE IMMISCENTIUM CONTROVERSIAE DE GYNAECOCRATIA. It is in his collected prefaces, Leipsic, 1683.
Now Knox has been from the first a man well hated; and it is somewhat characteristic of his luck that he figures here in the very forefront of the list of partial scribes who trimmed their doctrine with the wind in all good conscience, and were political weathercocks out of conviction. Not only has Thomasius mentioned him, but Bayle has taken the hint from Thomasius, and dedicated29 a long note to the matter at the end of his article on the Scotch30 Reformer. This is a little less than fair. If any one among the evangelists of that period showed more serious political sense than another, it was assuredly Knox; and even in this very matter of female rule, although I do not suppose any one nowadays will feel inclined to endorse31 his sentiments, I confess I can make great allowance for his conduct. The controversy, besides, has an interest of its own, in view of later controversies32.
John Knox, from 1556 to 1559, was resident in Geneva, as minister, jointly33 with Goodman, of a little church of English refugees. He and his congregation were banished34 from England by one woman, Mary Tudor, and proscribed36 in Scotland by another, the Regent Mary of Guise37. The coincidence was tempting38: here were many abuses centring about one abuse; here was Christ’s Gospel persecuted39 in the two kingdoms by one anomalous40 power. He had not far to go to find the idea that female government was anomalous. It was an age, indeed, in which women, capable and incapable41, played a conspicuous42 part upon the stage of European history; and yet their rule, whatever may have been the opinion of here and there a wise man or enthusiast43, was regarded as an anomaly by the great bulk of their contemporaries. It was defended as an anomaly. It, and all that accompanied and sanctioned it, was set aside as a single exception; and no one thought of reasoning down from queens and extending their privileges to ordinary women. Great ladies, as we know, had the privilege of entering into monasteries44 and cloisters45, otherwise forbidden to their sex. As with one thing, so with another. Thus, Margaret of Navarre wrote books with great acclamation, and no one, seemingly, saw fit to call her conduct in question; but Mademoiselle de Gournay, Montaigne’s adopted daughter, was in a controversy with the world as to whether a woman might be an author without incongruity46. Thus, too, we have Theodore Agrippa d’Aubigne writing to his daughters about the learned women of his century, and cautioning them, in conclusion, that the study of letters was unsuited to ladies of a middling station, and should be reserved for princesses. 63 And once more, if we desire to see the same principle carried to ludicrous extreme, we shall find that Reverend Father in God the Abbot of Brantome, claiming, on the authority of some lord of his acquaintance, a privilege, or rather a duty, of free love for great princesses, and carefully excluding other ladies from the same gallant48 dispensation. 64 One sees the spirit in which these immunities49 were granted; and how they were but the natural consequence of that awe50 for courts and kings that made the last writer tell us, with simple wonder, how Catherine de Medici would “laugh her fill just like another” over the humours of pantaloons and zanies. And such servility was, of all things, what would touch most nearly the republican spirit of Knox. It was not difficult for him to set aside this weak scruple51 of loyalty52. The lantern of his analysis did not always shine with a very serviceable light; but he had the virtue53, at least, to carry it into many places of fictitious54 holiness, and was not abashed55 by the tinsel divinity that hedged kings and queens from his contemporaries. And so he could put the proposition in the form already mentioned: there was Christ’s Gospel persecuted in the two kingdoms by one anomalous power plainly, then, the “regiment56 of women” was Antichristian. Early in 1558 he communicated this discovery to the world, by publishing at Geneva his notorious book — THE FIRST BLAST OF THE TRUMPET57 AGAINST THE MONSTROUS58 REGIMENT OF WOMEN. 65
63 Oeuvres de d’Aubigne, i. 449.
64 Dames60 Illustres, pp. 358-360.
65 Works of John Knox, iv. 349.
As a whole, it is a dull performance; but the preface, as is usual with Knox, is both interesting and morally fine. Knox was not one of those who are humble61 in the hour of triumph; he was aggressive even when things were at their worst. He had a grim reliance in himself, or rather in his mission; if he were not sure that he was a great man, he was at least sure that he was one set apart to do great things. And he judged simply that whatever passed in his mind, whatever moved him to flee from persecution62 instead of constantly facing it out, or, as here, to publish and withhold63 his name from the title-page of a critical work, would not fail to be of interest, perhaps of benefit, to the world. There may be something more finely sensitive in the modern humour, that tends more and more to withdraw a man’s personality from the lessons he inculcates or the cause that he has espoused64; but there is a loss herewith of wholesome66 responsibility; and when we find in the works of Knox, as in the Epistles of Paul, the man himself standing67 nakedly forward, courting and anticipating criticism, putting his character, as it were, in pledge for the sincerity of his doctrine, we had best waive68 the question of delicacy69, and make our acknowledgments for a lesson of courage, not unnecessary in these days of anonymous70 criticism, and much light, otherwise unattainable, on the spirit in which great movements were initiated71 and carried forward. Knox’s personal revelations are always interesting; and, in the case of the “First Blast,” as I have said, there is no exception to the rule. He begins by stating the solemn responsibility of all who are watchmen over God’s flock; and all are watchmen (he goes on to explain, with that fine breadth of spirit that characterises him even when, as here, he shows himself most narrow), all are watchmen “whose eyes God doth open, and whose conscience he pricketh to admonish72 the ungodly.” And with the full consciousness of this great duty before him, he sets himself to answer the scruples73 of timorous74 or worldly-minded people. How can a man repent75, he asks, unless the nature of his transgression76 is made plain to him? “And therefore I say,” he continues, “that of necessity it is that this monstriferous empire of women (which among all enormities that this day do abound77 upon the face of the whole earth, is most detestable and damnable) be openly and plainly declared to the world, to the end that some may repent and be saved.” To those who think the doctrine useless, because it cannot be expected to amend78 those princes whom it would dispossess if once accepted, he makes answer in a strain that shows him at his greatest. After having instanced how the rumour79 of Christ’s censures80 found its way to Herod in his own court, “even so,” he continues, “may the sound of our weak trumpet, by the support of some wind (blow it from the south, or blow it from the north, it is of no matter), come to the ears of the chief offenders81. BUT WHETHER IT DO OR NOT, YET DARE WE NOT CEASE TO BLOW AS GOD WILL GIVE STRENGTH. FOR WE ARE DEBTORS82 TO MORE THAN TO PRINCES, TO WIT, TO THE GREAT MULTITUDE OF OUR BRETHREN, of whom, no doubt, a great number have heretofore offended by error and ignorance.”
It is for the multitude, then, he writes; he does not greatly hope that his trumpet will be audible in palaces, or that crowned women will submissively discrown themselves at his appeal; what he does hope, in plain English, is to encourage and justify83 rebellion; and we shall see, before we have done, that he can put his purpose into words as roundly as I can put it for him. This he sees to be a matter of much hazard; he is not “altogether so brutish and insensible, but that he has laid his account what the finishing of the work may cost.” He knows that he will find many adversaries84, since “to the most part of men, lawful85 and godly appeareth whatsoever86 antiquity87 hath received.” He looks for opposition, “not only of the ignorant multitude, but of the wise, politic, and quiet spirits of the earth.” He will be called foolish, curious, despiteful, and a sower of sedition88; and one day, perhaps, for all he is now nameless, he may be attainted of treason. Yet he has “determined to obey God, notwithstanding that the world shall rage thereat.” Finally, he makes some excuse for the anonymous appearance of this first instalment: it is his purpose thrice to blow the trumpet in this matter, if God so permit; twice he intends to do it without name; but at the last blast to take the odium upon himself, that all others may be purged90.
Thus he ends the preface, and enters upon his argument with a secondary title: “The First Blast to awake Women degenerate91.” We are in the land of assertion without delay. That a woman should bear rule, superiority, dominion92 or empire over any realm, nation, or city, he tells us, is repugnant to nature, contumely to God, and a subversion93 of good order. Women are weak, frail94, impatient, feeble, and foolish. God has denied to woman wisdom to consider, or providence95 to foresee, what is profitable to a commonwealth. Women have been ever lightly esteemed96; they have been denied the tutory of their own sons, and subjected to the unquestionable sway of their husbands; and surely it is irrational98 to give the greater where the less has been withheld99, and suffer a woman to reign27 supreme100 over a great kingdom who would be allowed no authority by her own fireside. He appeals to the Bible; but though he makes much of the first transgression and certain strong texts in Genesis and Paul’s Epistles, he does not appeal with entire success. The cases of Deborah and Huldah can be brought into no sort of harmony with his thesis. Indeed, I may say that, logically, he left his bones there; and that it is but the phantom102 of an argument that he parades thenceforward to the end. Well was it for Knox that he succeeded no better; it is under this very ambiguity103 about Deborah that we shall find him fain to creep for shelter before he is done with the regiment of women. After having thus exhausted104 Scripture105, and formulated106 its teaching in the somewhat blasphemous107 maxim108 that the man is placed above the woman, even as God above the angels, he goes on triumphantly109 to adduce the testimonies110 of Tertullian, Augustine, Ambrose, Basil, Chrysostom, and the Pandects; and having gathered this little cloud of witnesses about him, like pursuivants about a herald111, he solemnly proclaims all reigning112 women to be traitoresses and rebels against God; discharges all men thenceforward from holding any office under such monstrous regiment, and calls upon all the lieges with one consent to “STUDY TO REPRESS THE INORDINATE113 PRIDE AND TYRANNY” OF QUEENS. If this is not treasonable teaching, one would be glad to know what is; and yet, as if he feared he had not made the case plain enough against himself, he goes on to deduce the startling corollary that all oaths of allegiance must be incontinently broken. If it was sin thus to have sworn even in ignorance, it were obstinate114 sin to continue to respect them after fuller knowledge. Then comes the peroration115, in which he cries aloud against the cruelties of that cursed Jezebel of England — that horrible monster Jezebel of England; and after having predicted sudden destruction to her rule and to the rule of all crowned women, and warned all men that if they presume to defend the same when any “noble heart” shall be raised up to vindicate116 the liberty of his country, they shall not fail to perish themselves in the ruin, he concludes with a last rhetorical flourish: “And therefore let all men be advertised, for THE TRUMPET HATH ONCE BLOWN.”
The capitals are his own. In writing, he probably felt the want of some such reverberation118 of the pulpit under strong hands as he was wont119 to emphasise120 his spoken utterances123 withal; there would seem to him a want of passion in the orderly lines of type; and I suppose we may take the capitals as a mere124 substitute for the great voice with which he would have given it forth125, had we heard it from his own lips. Indeed, as it is, in this little strain of rhetoric117 about the trumpet, this current allusion126 to the fall of Jericho, that alone distinguishes his bitter and hasty production, he was probably right, according to all artistic127 canon, thus to support and accentuate128 in conclusion the sustained metaphor129 of a hostile proclamation. It is curious, by the way, to note how favourite an image the trumpet was with the Reformer. He returns to it again and again; it is the Alpha and Omega of his rhetoric; it is to him what a ship is to the stage sailor; and one would almost fancy he had begun the world as a trumpeter’s apprentice130. The partiality is surely characteristic. All his life long he was blowing summonses before various Jerichos, some of which fell duly, but not all. Wherever he appears in history his speech is loud, angry, and hostile; there is no peace in his life, and little tenderness; he is always sounding hopefully to the front for some rough enterprise.
And as his voice had something of the trumpet’s hardness, it had something also of the trumpet’s warlike inspiration. So Randolph, possibly fresh from the sound of the Reformer’s preaching, writes of him to Cecil:- “Where your honour exhorteth us to stoutness131, I assure you the voice of one man is able, in an hour, to put more life in us than six hundred trumpets132 continually blustering133 in our ears.” 66
66 M’Crie’s LIFE OF KNOX, ii. 41.
Thus was the proclamation made. Nor was it long in wakening all the echoes of Europe. What success might have attended it, had the question decided134 been a purely abstract question, it is difficult to say. As it was, it was to stand or fall, not by logic101, but by political needs and sympathies. Thus, in France, his doctrine was to have some future, because Protestants suffered there under the feeble and treacherous136 regency of Catherine de Medici; and thus it was to have no future anywhere else, because the Protestant interest was bound up with the prosperity of Queen Elizabeth. This stumbling-block lay at the very threshold of the matter; and Knox, in the text of the “First Blast,” had set everybody the wrong example and gone to the ground himself. He finds occasion to regret “the blood of innocent Lady Jane Dudley.” But Lady Jane Dudley, or Lady Jane Grey, as we call her, was a would-be traitoress and rebel against God, to use his own expressions. If, therefore, political and religious sympathy led Knox himself into so grave a partiality, what was he to expect from his disciples137?
If the trumpet gave so ambiguous a sound, who could heartily138 prepare himself for the battle? The question whether Lady Jane Dudley was an innocent martyr139, or a traitoress against God, whose inordinate pride and tyranny had been effectually repressed, was thus left altogether in the wind; and it was not, perhaps, wonderful if many of Knox’s readers concluded that all right and wrong in the matter turned upon the degree of the sovereign’s orthodoxy and possible helpfulness to the Reformation. He should have been the more careful of such an ambiguity of meaning, as he must have known well the lukewarm indifference140 and dishonesty of his fellow-reformers in political matters. He had already, in 1556 or 1557, talked the matter over with his great master, Calvin, in “a private conversation;” and the interview 67 must have been truly distasteful to both parties. Calvin, indeed, went a far way with him in theory, and owned that the “government of women was a deviation141 from the original and proper order of nature, to be ranked, no less than slavery, among the punishments consequent upon the fall of man.” But, in practice, their two roads separated. For the Man of Geneva saw difficulties in the way of the Scripture proof in the cases of Deborah and Huldah, and in the prophecy of Isaiah that queens should be the nursing mothers of the Church. And as the Bible was not decisive, he thought the subject should be let alone, because, “by custom and public consent and long practice, it has been established that realms and principalities may descend142 to females by hereditary143 right, and it would not be lawful to unsettle governments which are ordained144 by the peculiar145 providence of God.” I imagine Knox’s ears must have burned during this interview. Think of him listening dutifully to all this — how it would not do to meddle with anointed kings — how there was a peculiar providence in these great affairs; and then think of his own peroration, and the “noble heart” whom he looks for “to vindicate the liberty of his country;” or his answer to Queen Mary, when she asked him who he was, to interfere19 in the affairs of Scotland:- “Madam, a subject born within the same!” Indeed, the two doctors who differed at this private conversation represented, at the moment, two principles of enormous import in the subsequent history of Europe. In Calvin we have represented that passive obedience146, that toleration of injustice147 and absurdity148, that holding back of the hand from political affairs as from something unclean, which lost France, if we are to believe M. Michelet, for the Reformation; a spirit necessarily fatal in the long run to the existence of any sect149 that may profess12 it; a suicidal doctrine that survives among us to this day in narrow views of personal duty, and the low political morality of many virtuous150 men. In Knox, on the other hand, we see foreshadowed the whole Puritan Revolution and the scaffold of Charles I.
67 Described by Calvin in a letter to Cecil, Knox’s Works, vol. iv.
There is little doubt in my mind that this interview was what caused Knox to print his book without a name. 68 It was a dangerous thing to contradict the Man of Geneva, and doubly so, surely, when one had had the advantage of correction from him in a private conversation; and Knox had his little flock of English refugees to consider. If they had fallen into bad odour at Geneva, where else was there left to flee to? It was printed, as I said, in 1558; and, by a singular MAL-A-PROPOS, in that same year Mary died, and Elizabeth succeeded to the throne of England. And just as the accession of Catholic Queen Mary had condemned female rule in the eyes of Knox, the accession of Protestant Queen Elizabeth justified151 it in the eyes of his colleagues. Female rule ceases to be an anomaly, not because Elizabeth can “reply to eight ambassadors in one day in their different languages,” but because she represents for the moment the political future of the Reformation. The exiles troop back to England with songs of praise in their mouths. The bright accidental star, of which we have all read in the Preface to the Bible, has risen over the darkness of Europe. There is a thrill of hope through the persecuted Churches of the Continent. Calvin writes to Cecil, washing his hands of Knox and his political heresies152. The sale of the “First Blast” is prohibited in Geneva; and along with it the bold book of Knox’s colleague, Goodman — a book dear to Milton — where female rule was briefly153 characterised as a “monster in nature and disorder154 among men.” 69 Any who may ever have doubted, or been for a moment led away by Knox or Goodman, or their own wicked imaginations, are now more than convinced. They have seen the accidental star. Aylmer, with his eye set greedily on a possible bishopric, and “the better to obtain the favour of the new Queen,” 70 sharpens his pen to confound Knox by logic. What need? He has been confounded by facts. “Thus what had been to the refugees of Geneva as the very word of God, no sooner were they back in England than, behold156! it was the word of the devil.” 71
68 It was anonymously157 published, but no one seems to have been in doubt about its authorship; he might as well have set his name to it, for all the good he got by holding it back.
69 Knox’s Works, iv. 358.
70 Strype’s AYLMER, p. 16.
71 It may interest the reader to know that these (so says Thomasius) are the “ipsissima verba Schlusselburgii.”
Now, what of the real sentiments of these loyal subjects of Elizabeth? They professed a holy horror for Knox’s position: let us see if their own would please a modern audience any better, or was, in substance, greatly different.
John Aylmer, afterwards Bishop155 of London, published an answer to Knox, under the title of AN HARBOUR FOR FAITHFUL AND TRUE SUBJECTS AGAINST THE LATE BLOWN BLAST, CONCERNING THE GOVERNMENT OF WOMEN. 72 And certainly he was a thought more acute, a thought less precipitate159 and simple, than his adversary160. He is not to be led away by such captious161 terms as NATURAL AND UNNATURAL162. It is obvious to him that a woman’s disability to rule is not natural in the same sense in which it is natural for a stone to fall or fire to burn. He is doubtful, on the whole, whether this disability be natural at all; nay, when he is laying it down that a woman should not be a priest, he shows some elementary conception of what many of us now hold to be the truth of the matter. “The bringing-up of women,” he says, “is commonly such” that they cannot have the necessary qualifications, “for they are not brought upon learning in schools, nor trained in disputation.” And even so, he can ask, “Are there not in England women, think you, that for learning and wisdom could tell their household and neighbours as good a tale as any Sir John there?” For all that, his advocacy is weak. If women’s rule is not unnatural in a sense preclusive163 of its very existence, it is neither so convenient nor so profitable as the government of men. He holds England to be specially164 suitable for the government of women, because there the governor is more limited and restrained by the other members of the constitution than in other places; and this argument has kept his book from being altogether forgotten. It is only in hereditary monarchies165 that he will offer any defence of the anomaly. “If rulers were to be chosen by lot or suffrage166, he would not that any women should stand in the election, but men only.” The law of succession of crowns was a law to him, in the same sense as the law of evolution is a law to Mr. Herbert Spencer; and the one and the other counsels his readers, in a spirit suggestively alike, not to kick against the pricks167 or seek to be more wise than He who made them. 73 If God has put a female child into the direct line of inheritance, it is God’s affair. His strength will be perfected in her weakness. He makes the Creator address the objectors in this not very flattering vein:- “I, that could make Daniel, a sucking babe, to judge better than the wisest lawyers; a brute168 beast to reprehend169 the folly170 of a prophet; and poor fishers to confound the great clerks of the world — cannot I make a woman to be a good ruler over you?” This is the last word of his reasoning. Although he was not altogether without Puritanic leaven171, shown particularly in what he says of the incomes of Bishops172, yet it was rather loyalty to the old order of things than any generous belief in the capacity of women, that raised up for them this clerical champion. His courtly spirit contrasts singularly with the rude, bracing173 republicanism of Knox. “Thy knee shall bow,” he says, “thy cap shall off, thy tongue shall speak reverently174 of thy sovereign.” For himself, his tongue is even more than reverent175. Nothing can stay the issue of his eloquent176 adulation. Again and again, “the remembrance of Elizabeth’s virtues” carries him away; and he has to hark back again to find the scent28 of his argument. He is repressing his vehement177 adoration178 throughout, until, when the end comes, and he feels his business at an end, he can indulge himself to his heart’s content in indiscriminate laudation of his royal mistress. It is humorous to think that this illustrious lady, whom he here praises, among many other excellences179, for the simplicity180 of her attire181 and the “marvellous meekness182 of her stomach,” threatened him, years after, in no very meek183 terms, for a sermon against female vanity in dress, which she held as a reflection on herself. 74
72 I am indebted for a sight of this book to the kindness of Mr. David Laing, the editor of Knox’s Works.
73 SOCIAL STATICS, p. 64, etc.
74 Hallam’s CONST. HIST. OF ENGLAND, i. 225, note m.
Whatever was wanting here in respect for women generally, there was no want of respect for the Queen; and one cannot very greatly wonder if these devoted184 servants looked askance, not upon Knox only, but on his little flock, as they came back to England tainted89 with disloyal doctrine. For them, as for him, the accidental star rose somewhat red and angry. As for poor Knox, his position was the saddest of all. For the juncture185 seemed to him of the highest importance; it was the nick of time, the flood-water of opportunity. Not only was there an opening for him in Scotland, a smouldering brand of civil liberty and religious enthusiasm which it should be for him to kindle186 into flame with his powerful breath but he had his eye seemingly on an object of even higher worth. For now, when religious sympathy ran so high that it could be set against national aversion, he wished to begin the fusion187 together of England and Scotland, and to begin it at the sore place. If once the open wound were closed at the Border, the work would be half done. Ministers placed at Berwick and such places might seek their converts equally on either side of the march; old enemies would sit together to hear the gospel of peace, and forget the inherited jealousies188 of many generations in the enthusiasm of a common faith; or — let us say better — a common heresy189. For people are not most conscious of brotherhood190 when they continue languidly together in one creed191, but when, with some doubt, with some danger perhaps, and certainly not without some reluctance192, they violently break with the tradition of the past, and go forth from the sanctuary193 of their fathers to worship under the bare heaven. A new creed, like a new country, is an unhomely place of sojourn194; but it makes men lean on one another and join hands. It was on this that Knox relied to begin the union of the English and the Scotch. And he had, perhaps, better means of judging than any even of his contemporaries. He knew the temper of both nations; and already during his two years’ chaplaincy at Berwick, he had seen his scheme put to the proof. But whether practicable or not, the proposal does him much honour. That he should thus have sought to make a love-match of it between the two peoples, and tried to win their inclination195 towards a union instead of simply transferring them, like so many sheep, by a marriage, or testament196, or private treaty, is thoroughly characteristic of what is best in the man. Nor was this all. He had, besides, to assure himself of English support, secret or avowed197, for the reformation party in Scotland; a delicate affair, trenching upon treason. And so he had plenty to say to Cecil, plenty that he did not care to “commit to paper neither yet to the knowledge of many.” But his miserable198 publication had shut the doors of England in his face. Summoned to Edinburgh by the confederate lords, he waited at Dieppe, anxiously praying for leave to journey through England. The most dispiriting tidings reach him. His messengers, coming from so obnoxious199 a quarter, narrowly escape imprisonment200. His old congregation are coldly received, and even begin to look back again to their place of exile with regret. “My First Blast,” he writes ruefully, “has blown from me all my friends of England.” And then he adds, with a snarl201, “The Second Blast, I fear, shall sound somewhat more sharp, except men be more moderate than I hear they are.” 75 But the threat is empty; there will never be a second blast — he has had enough of that trumpet. Nay, he begins to feel uneasily that, unless he is to be rendered useless for the rest of his life, unless he is to lose his right arm and go about his great work maimed and impotent, he must find some way of making his peace with England and the indignant Queen. The letter just quoted was written on the 6th of April 1559; and on the 10th, after he had cooled his heels for four days more about the streets of Dieppe, he gave in altogether, and writes a letter of capitulation to Cecil. In this letter, 76 which he kept back until the 22d, still hoping that things would come right of themselves, he censures the great secretary for having “followed the world in the way of perdition,” characterises him as “worthy203 of hell,” and threatens him, if he be not found simple, sincere, and fervent204 in the cause of Christ’s gospel, that he shall “taste of the same cup that politic heads have drunken in before him.” This is all, I take it, out of respect for the Reformer’s own position; if he is going to be humiliated205, let others be humiliated first; like a child who will not take his medicine until he has made his nurse and his mother drink of it before him. “But I have, say you, written a treasonable book against the regiment and empire of women. . . . The writing of that book I will not deny; but to prove it treasonable I think it shall be hard. . . . It is hinted that my book shall be written against. If so be, sir, I greatly doubt they shall rather hurt nor (than) mend the matter.” And here come the terms of capitulation; for he does not surrender unconditionally206, even in this sore strait: “And yet if any,” he goes on, “think me enemy to the person, or yet to the regiment, of her whom God hath now promoted, they are utterly207 deceived in me, FOR THE MIRACULOUS208 WORK OF GOD, COMFORTING HIS AFFLICTED209 BY MEANS OF AN INFIRM VESSEL210, I DO ACKNOWLEDGE, AND THE POWER OF HIS MOST POTENT202 HAND I WILL OBEY. MORE PLAINLY TO SPEAK, IF QUEEN ELIZABETH SHALL CONFESS, THAT THE EXTRAORDINARY DISPENSATION OF GOD’S GREAT MERCY MAKETH THAT LAWFUL UNTO HER WHICH BOTH NATURE AND GOD’S LAW DO DENY TO ALL WOMEN, then shall none in England be more willing to maintain her lawful authority than I shall be. But if (God’s wondrous211 work set aside) she ground (as God forbid) the justness of her title upon consuetude, laws, or ordinances212 of men, then” — Then Knox will denounce her? Not so; he is more politic nowadays — then, he “greatly fears” that her ingratitude213 to God will not go long without punishment.
75 Knox to Mrs. Locke, 6th April 1559. Works, vi. 14.
76 Knox to Sir William Cecil, 10th April 1559. Works, ii. 16, or vi. 15.
His letter to Elizabeth, written some few months later, was a mere amplification214 of the sentences quoted above. She must base her title entirely215 upon the extraordinary providence of God; but if she does this, “if thus, in God’s presence, she humbles216 herself, so will he with tongue and pen justify her authority, as the Holy Ghost hath justified the same in Deborah, that blessed mother in Israel.” 77 And so, you see, his consistency217 is preserved; he is merely applying the doctrine of the “First Blast.” The argument goes thus: The regiment of women is, as before noted218 in our work, repugnant to nature, contumely to God, and a subversion of good order. It has nevertheless pleased God to raise up, as exceptions to this law, first Deborah, and afterward158 Elizabeth Tudor — whose regiment we shall proceed to celebrate.
77 Knox to Queen Elizabeth, July. 20th, 1559. Works, vi. 47, or ii. 26.
There is no evidence as to how the Reformer’s explanations were received, and indeed it is most probable that the letter was never shown to Elizabeth at all. For it was sent under cover of another to Cecil, and as it was not of a very courtly conception throughout, and was, of all things, what would most excite the Queen’s uneasy jealousy219 about her title, it is like enough that the secretary exercised his discretion220 (he had Knox’s leave in this case, and did not always wait for that, it is reputed) to put the letter harmlessly away beside other valueless or unpresentable State Papers. I wonder very much if he did the same with another, 78 written two years later, after Mary had come into Scotland, in which Knox almost seeks to make Elizabeth an accomplice221 with him in the matter of the “First Blast.” The Queen of Scotland is going to have that work refuted, he tells her; and “though it were but foolishness in him to prescribe unto her Majesty222 what is to be done,” he would yet remind her that Mary is neither so much alarmed about her own security, nor so generously interested in Elizabeth’s, “that she would take such pains, UNLESS HER CRAFTY223 COUNSEL IN SO DOING SHOT AT A FURTHER MARK.” There is something really ingenious in this letter; it showed Knox in the double capacity of the author of the “First Blast” and the faithful friend of Elizabeth; and he combines them there so naturally, that one would scarcely imagine the two to be incongruous.
78 Knox to Queen Elizabeth, August 6th, 1561. Works, vi. 126.
Twenty days later he was defending his intemperate224 publication to another queen — his own queen, Mary Stuart. This was on the first of those three interviews which he has preserved for us with so much dramatic vigour225 in the picturesque226 pages of his history. After he had avowed the authorship in his usual haughty227 style, Mary asked: “You think, then, that I have no just authority?” The question was evaded228. “Please your Majesty,” he answered, “that learned men in all ages have had their judgments229 free, and most commonly disagreeing from the common judgment230 of the world; such also have they published by pen and tongue; and yet notwithstanding they themselves have lived in the common society with others, and have borne patiently with the errors and imperfections which they could not amend.” Thus did “Plato the philosopher:” thus will do John Knox. “I have communicated my judgment to the world: if the realm finds no inconvenience from the regiment of a woman, that which they approve, shall I not further disallow231 than within my own breast; but shall be as well content to live under your Grace, as Paul was to live under Nero. And my hope is, that so long as ye defile232 not your hands with the blood of the saints of God, neither I nor my book shall hurt either you or your authority.” All this is admirable in wisdom and moderation, and, except that he might have hit upon a comparison less offensive than that with Paul and Nero, hardly to be bettered. Having said thus much, he feels he needs say no more; and so, when he is further pressed, he closes that part of the discussion with an astonishing sally. If he has been content to let this matter sleep, he would recommend her Grace to follow his example with thankfulness of heart; it is grimly to be understood which of them has most to fear if the question should be reawakened. So the talk wandered to other subjects. Only, when the Queen was summoned at last to dinner (“for it was afternoon”) Knox made his salutation in this form of words: “I pray God, Madam, that you may be as much blessed within the Commonwealth of Scotland, if it be the pleasure of God, as ever Deborah was in the Commonwealth of Israel.” 79 Deborah again.
79 Knox’s Works, ii. 278-280.
But he was not yet done with the echoes of his own “First Blast.” In 1571, when he was already near his end, the old controversy was taken up in one of a series of anonymous libels against the Reformer affixed233, Sunday after Sunday, to the church door. The dilemma234 was fairly enough stated. Either his doctrine is false, in which case he is a “false doctor” and seditious; or, if it be true, why does he “avow and approve the contrare, I mean that regiment in the Queen of England’s person; which he avoweth and approveth, not only praying for the maintenance of her estate, but also procuring235 her aid and support against his own native country?” Knox answered the libel, as his wont was, next Sunday, from the pulpit. He justified the “First Blast” with all the old arrogance236; there is no drawing back there. The regiment of women is repugnant to nature, contumely to God, and a subversion of good order, as before. When he prays for the maintenance of Elizabeth’s estate, he is only following the example of those prophets of God who warned and comforted the wicked kings of Israel; or of Jeremiah, who bade the Jews pray for the prosperity of Nebuchadnezzar. As for the Queen’s aid, there is no harm in that: QUIA (these are his own words) QUIA OMNIA MUNDA MUNDIS: because to the pure all things are pure. One thing, in conclusion, he “may not pretermit” to give the lie in the throat to his accuser, where he charges him with seeking support against his native country. “What I have been to my country,” said the old Reformer, “What I have been to my country, albeit237 this unthankful age will not know, yet the ages to come will be compelled to bear witness to the truth. And thus I cease, requiring of all men that have anything to oppone against me, that he may (they may) do it so plainly, as that I may make myself and all my doings manifest to the world. For to me it seemeth a thing unreasonable238, that, in this my decrepit239 age, I shall be compelled to fight against shadows, and howlets that dare not abide240 the light.” 80
80 Calderwood’s HISTORY OF THE KIRK OF Scotland, edition of the Wodrow Society, iii. 51-54.
Now, in this, which may be called his LAST BLAST, there is as sharp speaking as any in the “First Blast” itself. He is of the same opinion to the end, you see, although he has been obliged to cloak and garble241 that opinion for political ends. He has been tacking242 indeed, and he has indeed been seeking the favour of a queen; but what man ever sought a queen’s favour with a more virtuous purpose, or with as little courtly policy? The question of consistency is delicate, and must be made plain. Knox never changed his opinion about female rule, but lived to regret that he had published that opinion. Doubtless he had many thoughts so far out of the range of public sympathy, that he could only keep them to himself, and, in his own words, bear patiently with the errors and imperfections that he could not amend. For example, I make no doubt myself that, in his own heart, he did hold the shocking dogma attributed to him by more than one calumniator243; and that, had the time been ripe, had there been aught to gain by it, instead of all to lose, he would have been the first to assert that Scotland was elective instead of hereditary — “elective as in the days of paganism,” as one Thevet says in holy horror. 81 And yet, because the time was not ripe, I find no hint of such an idea in his collected works. Now, the regiment of women was another matter that he should have kept to himself; right or wrong, his opinion did not fit the moment; right or wrong, as Aylmer puts it, “the BLAST was blown out of season.” And this it was that he began to perceive after the accession of Elizabeth; not that he had been wrong, and that female rule was a good thing, for he had said from the first that “the felicity of some women in their empires” could not change the law of God and the nature of created things; not this, but that the regiment of women was one of those imperfections of society which must be borne with because yet they cannot be remedied. The thing had seemed so obvious to him, in his sense of unspeakable masculine superiority, and his fine contempt for what is only sanctioned by antiquity and common consent, he had imagined that, at the first hint, men would arise and shake off the debasing tyranny. He found himself wrong, and he showed that he could be moderate in his own fashion, and understood the spirit of true compromise. He came round to Calvin’s position, in fact, but by a different way. And it derogates nothing from the merit of this wise attitude that it was the consequence of a change of interest. We are all taught by interest; and if the interest be not merely selfish, there is no wiser preceptor under heaven, and perhaps no sterner.
81 BAYLE’S HISTORICAL DICTIONARY, art. Knox, remark G.
Such is the history of John Knox’s connection with the controversy about female rule. In itself, this is obviously an incomplete study; not fully47 to be understood, without a knowledge of his private relations with the other sex, and what he thought of their position in domestic life. This shall be dealt with in another paper.
II. — Private Life.
TO those who know Knox by hearsay244 only, I believe the matter of this paper will be somewhat astonishing. For the hard energy of the man in all public mattress245 has possessed246 the imagination of the world; he remains247 for posterity248 in certain traditional phrases, browbeating249 Queen Mary, or breaking beautiful carved work in abbeys and cathedrals, that had long smoked themselves out and were no more than sorry ruins, while he was still quietly teaching children in a country gentleman’s family. It does not consist with the common acceptation of his character to fancy him much moved, except with anger. And yet the language of passion came to his pen as readily, whether it was a passion of denunciation against some of the abuses that vexed250 his righteous spirit, or of yearning251 for the society of an absent friend. He was vehement in affection, as in doctrine. I will not deny that there may have been, along with his vehemence252, something shifty, and for the moment only; that, like many men, and many Scotchmen, he saw the world and his own heart, not so much under any very steady, equable light, as by extreme flashes of passion, true for the moment, but not true in the long run. There does seem to me to be something of this traceable in the Reformer’s utterances: precipitation and repentance253, hardy254 speech and action somewhat circumspect255, a strong tendency to see himself in a heroic light and to place a ready belief in the disposition256 of the moment. Withal he had considerable confidence in himself, and in the uprightness of his own disciplined emotions, underlying257 much sincere aspiration258 after spiritual humility259. And it is this confidence that makes his intercourse260 with women so interesting to a modern. It would be easy, of course, to make fun of the whole affair, to picture him strutting261 vaingloriously among these inferior creatures, or compare a religious friendship in the sixteenth century with what was called, I think, a literary friendship in the eighteenth. But it is more just and profitable to recognise what there is sterling262 and human underneath263 all his theoretical affectations of superiority. Women, he has said in his “First Blast,” are, “weak, frail, impatient, feeble, and foolish;” and yet it does not appear that he was himself any less dependent than other men upon the sympathy and affection of these weak, frail, impatient, feeble, and foolish creatures; it seems even as if he had been rather more dependent than most.
Of those who are to act influentially264 on their fellows, we should expect always something large and public in their way of life, something more or less urbane266 and comprehensive in their sentiment for others. We should not expect to see them spend their sympathy in idyls, however beautiful. We should not seek them among those who, if they have but a wife to their bosom267, ask no more of womankind, just as they ask no more of their own sex, if they can find a friend or two for their immediate need. They will be quick to feel all the pleasures of our association — not the great ones alone, but all. They will know not love only, but all those other ways in which man and woman mutually make each other happy — by sympathy, by admiration269, by the atmosphere they bear about them — down to the mere impersonal270 pleasure of passing happy faces in the street. For, through all this gradation, the difference of sex makes itself pleasurably felt. Down to the most lukewarm courtesies of life, there is a special chivalry271 due and a special pleasure received, when the two sexes are brought ever so lightly into contact. We love our mothers otherwise than we love our fathers; a sister is not as a brother to us; and friendship between man and woman, be it never so unalloyed and innocent, is not the same as friendship between man and man. Such friendship is not even possible for all. To conjoin tenderness for a woman that is not far short of passionate272 with such disinterestedness273 and beautiful gratuity274 of affection as there is between friends of the same sex, requires no ordinary disposition in the man. For either it would presuppose quite womanly delicacy of perception, and, as it were, a curiosity in shades of differing sentiment; or it would mean that he had accepted the large, simple divisions of society: a strong and positive spirit robustly275 virtuous, who has chosen a better part coarsely, and holds to it steadfastly277, with all its consequences of pain to himself and others; as one who should go straight before him on a journey, neither tempted278 by wayside flowers nor very scrupulous279 of small lives under foot. It was in virtue of this latter disposition that Knox was capable of those intimacies280 with women that embellished281 his life; and we find him preserved for us in old letters as a man of many women friends; a man of some expansion toward the other sex; a man ever ready to comfort weeping women, and to weep along with them.
Of such scraps282 and fragments of evidence as to his private life and more intimate thoughts as have survived to us from all the perils283 that environ written paper, an astonishingly large proportion is in the shape of letters to women of his familiarity. He was twice married, but that is not greatly to the purpose; for the Turk, who thinks even more meanly of women than John Knox, is none the less given to marrying. What is really significant is quite apart from marriage. For the man Knox was a true man, and woman, the EWIG-WEIBLICHE, was as necessary to him, in spite of all low theories, as ever she was to Goethe. He came to her in a certain halo of his own, as the minister of truth, just as Goethe came to her in a glory of art; he made himself necessary to troubled hearts and minds exercised in the painful complications that naturally result from all changes in the world’s way of thinking; and those whom he had thus helped became dear to him, and were made the chosen companions of his leisure if they were at hand, or encouraged and comforted by letter if they were afar.
It must not be forgotten that Knox had been a presbyter of the old Church, and that the many women whom we shall see gathering285 around him, as he goes through life, had probably been accustomed, while still in the communion of Rome, to rely much upon some chosen spiritual director, so that the intimacies of which I propose to offer some account, while testifying to a good heart in the Reformer, testify also to a certain survival of the spirit of the confessional in the Reformed Church, and are not properly to be judged without this idea. There is no friendship so noble, but it is the product of the time; and a world of little finical observances, and little frail proprieties287 and fashions of the hour, go to make or to mar35, to stint288 or to perfect, the union of spirits the most loving and the most intolerant of such interference. The trick of the country and the age steps in even between the mother and her child, counts out their caresses289 upon niggardly290 fingers, and says, in the voice of authority, that this one thing shall be a matter of confidence between them, and this other thing shall not. And thus it is that we must take into reckoning whatever tended to modify the social atmosphere in which Knox and his women friends met, and loved and trusted each other. To the man who had been their priest and was now their minister, women would be able to speak with a confidence quite impossible in these latter days; the women would be able to speak, and the man to hear. It was a beaten road just then; and I daresay we should be no less scandalised at their plain speech than they, if they could come back to earth, would be offended at our waltzes and worldly fashions. This, then, was the footing on which Knox stood with his many women friends. The reader will see, as he goes on, how much of warmth, of interest, and of that happy mutual268 dependence291 which is the very gist292 of friendship, he contrived293 to ingraft upon this somewhat dry relationship of penitent294 and confessor.
It must be understood that we know nothing of his intercourse with women (as indeed we know little at all about his life) until he came to Berwick in 1549, when he was already in the forty-fifth year of his age. At the same time it is just possible that some of a little group at Edinburgh, with whom he corresponded during his last absence, may have been friends of an older standing. Certainly they were, of all his female correspondents, the least personally favoured. He treats them throughout in a comprehensive sort of spirit that must at times have been a little wounding. Thus, he remits295 one of them to his former letters, “which I trust be common betwixt you and the rest of our sisters, for to me ye are all equal in Christ.” 82 Another letter is a gem296 in this way. “Albeit” it begins, “albeit I have no particular matter to write unto you, beloved sister, yet I could not refrain to write these few lines to you in declaration of my remembrance of you. True it is that I have many whom I bear in equal remembrance before God with you, to whom at present I write nothing, either for that I esteem97 them stronger than you, and therefore they need the less my rude labours, or else because they have not provoked me by their writing to recompense their remembrance.” 83 His “sisters in Edinburgh” had evidently to “provoke his attention pretty constantly; nearly all his letters are, on the face of them, answers to questions, and the answers are given with a certain crudity297 that I do not find repeated when he writes to those he really cares for. So when they consult him about women’s apparel (a subject on which his opinion may be pretty correctly imagined by the ingenious reader for himself) he takes occasion to anticipate some of the most offensive matter of the “First Blast” in a style of real brutality298. 84 It is not merely that he tells them “the garments of women do declare their weakness and inability to execute the office of man,” though that in itself is neither very wise nor very opportune299 in such a correspondence one would think; but if the reader will take the trouble to wade300 through the long, tedious sermon for himself, he will see proof enough that Knox neither loved, nor very deeply respected, the women he was then addressing. In very truth, I believe these Edinburgh sisters simply bored him. He had a certain interest in them as his children in the Lord; they were continually “provoking him by their writing;” and, if they handed his letters about, writing to them was as good a form of publication as was then open to him in Scotland. There is one letter, however, in this budget, addressed to the wife of Clerk-Register Mackgil, which is worthy of some further mention. The Clerk-Register had not opened his heart, it would appear, to the preaching of the Gospel, and Mrs. Mackgil has written, seeking the Reformer’s prayers in his behalf. “Your husband,” he answers, “is dear to me for that he is a man indued with some good gifts, but more dear for that he is your husband. Charity moveth me to thirst his illumination, both for his comfort and for the trouble which you sustain by his coldness, which justly may be called infidelity.” He wishes her, however, not to hope too much; he can promise that his prayers will be earnest, but not that they will be effectual; it is possible that this is to be her “cross” in life; that “her head, appointed by God for her comfort, should be her enemy.” And if this be so, well, there is nothing for it; “with patience she must abide God’s merciful deliverance,” taking heed301 only that she does not “obey manifest iniquity302 for the pleasure of any mortal man.” 85 I conceive this epistle would have given a very modified sort of pleasure to the Clerk-Register, had it chanced to fall into his hands. Compare its tenor303 — the dry resignation not without a hope of merciful deliverance therein recommended — with these words from another letter, written but the year before to two married women of London: “Call first for grace by Jesus, and thereafter communicate with your faithful husbands, and then shall God, I doubt not, conduct your footsteps, and direct your counsels to His glory.” 86 Here the husbands are put in a very high place; we can recognise here the same hand that has written for our instruction how the man is set above the woman, even as God above the angels. But the point of the distinction is plain. For Clerk-Register Mackgil was not a faithful husband; displayed, indeed, towards religion a “coldness which justly might be called infidelity.” We shall see in more notable instances how much Knox’s conception of the duty of wives varies according to the zeal304 and orthodoxy of the husband.
82 Works, iv. 244.
83 Works, iv. 246.
84 IB. iv. 225.
85 Works, iv. 245.
86 IB. iv. 221.
As I have said, he may possibly have made the acquaintance of Mrs. Mackgil, Mrs. Guthrie, or some other, or all, of these Edinburgh friends while he was still Douglas of Longniddry’s private tutor. But our certain knowledge begins in 1549. He was then but newly escaped from his captivity305 in France, after pulling an oar276 for nineteen months on the benches of the galley306 NOSTRE DAME59; now up the rivers, holding stealthy intercourse with other Scottish prisoners in the castle of Rouen; now out in the North Sea, raising his sick head to catch a glimpse of the far-off steeples of St. Andrews. And now he was sent down by the English Privy307 Council as a preacher to Berwick-upon-Tweed; somewhat shaken in health by all his hardships, full of pains and agues, and tormented308 by gravel309, that sorrow of great men; altogether, what with his romantic story, his weak health, and his great faculty310 of eloquence311, a very natural object for the sympathy of devout312 women. At this happy juncture he fell into the company of a Mrs. Elizabeth Bowes, wife of Richard Bowes, of Aske, in Yorkshire, to whom she had borne twelve children. She was a religious hypochondriac, a very weariful woman, full of doubts and scruples, and giving no rest on earth either to herself or to those whom she honoured with her confidence. From the first time she heard Knox preach she formed a high opinion of him, and was solicitous313 ever after of his society. 87 Nor was Knox unresponsive. “I have always delighted in your company,” he writes, “and when labours would permit, you know I have not spared hours to talk and commune with you.” Often when they had met in depression he reminds her, “God hath sent great comfort unto both.” 88 We can gather from such letters as are yet extant how close and continuous was their intercourse. “I think it best you remain till the morrow,” he writes once, “and so shall we commune at large at afternoon. This day you know to be the day of my study and prayer unto God; yet if your trouble be intolerable, or, if you think my presence may release your pain, do as the Spirit shall move you. . . . Your messenger found me in bed, after a sore trouble and most dolorous314 night, and so dolour may complain to dolour when we two meet. . . . And this is more plain than ever I spoke121, to let you know you have a companion in trouble.” 89 Once we have the curtain raised for a moment, and can look at the two together for the length of a phrase. “After the writing of this preceding,” writes Knox, “your brother and mine, Harrie Wycliffe, did advertise me by writing, that our adversary (the devil) took occasion to trouble you because that I DID START BACK FROM YOU REHEARSING YOUR INFIRMITIES. I REMEMBER MYSELF SO TO HAVE DONE, AND THAT IS MY COMMON ON CONSUETUDE WHEN ANYTHING PIERCETH OR TOUCHETH MY HEART. CALL TO YOUR MIND WHAT I DID STANDING AT THE CUPBOARD AT ALNWICK. In very deed I thought that no creature had been tempted as I was; and when I heard proceed from your mouth the very same words that he troubles me with, I did wonder and from my heart lament315 your sore trouble, knowing in myself the dolour thereof.” 90 Now intercourse of so very close a description, whether it be religious intercourse or not, is apt to displease316 and disquiet317 a husband; and we know incidentally from Knox himself that there was some little scandal about his intimacy318 with Mrs. Bowes. “The slander319 and fear of men,” he writes, “has impeded320 me to exercise my pen so oft as I would; YEA, VERY SHAME HATH HOLDEN ME FROM YOUR COMPANY, WHEN I WAS MOST SURELY PERSUADED THAT GOD HAD APPOINTED ME AT THAT TIME TO COMFORT AND FEED YOUR HUNGRY AND AFFLICTED SOUL. GOD IN HIS INFINITE MERCY,” he goes on, “REMOVE NOT ONLY FROM ME ALL FEAR THAT TENDETH NOT TO GODLINESS, BUT FROM OTHERS SUSPICION TO JUDGE OF ME OTHERWISE THAN IT BECOMETH ONE MEMBER TO JUDGE OF ANOTHER,” 91 And the scandal, such as it was, would not be allayed322 by the dissension in which Mrs. Bowes seems to have lived with her family upon the matter of religion, and the countenance323 shown by Knox to her resistance. Talking of these conflicts, and her courage against “her own flesh and most inward affections, yea, against some of her most natural friends,” he writes it, “to the praise of God, he has wondered at the bold constancy which he has found in her when his own heart was faint.” 92
87 Works, vi. 514.
88 IB. iii. 338.
89 IB. iii. 352, 353.
90 Works, iii. 350.
91 IB. iii. 390, 391.
92 Works, iii. 142.
Now, perhaps in order to stop scandalous mouths, perhaps out of a desire to bind324 the much-loved evangelist nearer to her in the only manner possible, Mrs. Bowes conceived the scheme of marrying him to her fifth daughter, Marjorie; and the Reformer seems to have fallen in with it readily enough. It seems to have been believed in the family that the whole matter had been originally made up between these two, with no very spontaneous inclination on the part of the bride. 93 Knox’s idea of marriage, as I have said, was not the same for all men; but on the whole, it was not lofty. We have a curious letter of his, written at the request of Queen Mary, to the Earl of Argyle, on very delicate household matters; which, as he tells us, “was not well accepted of the said Earl.” 94 We may suppose, however, that his own home was regulated in a similar spirit. I can fancy that for such a man, emotional, and with a need, now and again, to exercise parsimony325 in emotions not strictly needful, something a little mechanical, something hard and fast and clearly understood, would enter into his ideal of a home. There were storms enough without, and equability was to be desired at the fireside even at a sacrifice of deeper pleasures. So, from a wife, of all women, he would not ask much. One letter to her which has come down to us is, I had almost said, conspicuous for coldness. 95 He calls her, as he called other female correspondents, “dearly beloved sister;” the epistle is doctrinal, and nearly the half of it bears, not upon her own case, but upon that of her mother. However, we know what Heine wrote in his wife’s album; and there is, after all, one passage that may be held to intimate some tenderness, although even that admits of an amusingly opposite construction. “I think,” he says, “I THINK this be the first letter I ever wrote to you.” This, if we are to take it literally326, may pair off with the “two OR THREE children” whom Montaigne mentions having lost at nurse; the one is as eccentric in a lover as the other in a parent. Nevertheless, he displayed more energy in the course of his troubled wooing than might have been expected. The whole Bowes family, angry enough already at the influence he had obtained over the mother, set their faces obdurately327 against the match. And I daresay the opposition quickened his inclination. I find him writing to Mrs. Bowes that she need no further trouble herself about the marriage; it should now be his business altogether; it behoved him now to jeopard his life “for the comfort of his own flesh, both fear and friendship of all earthly creature laid aside.” 96 This is a wonderfully chivalrous328 utterance122 for a Reformer forty-eight years old; and it compares well with the leaden coquetries of Calvin, not much over thirty, taking this and that into consideration, weighing together dowries and religious qualifications and the instancy of friends, and exhibiting what M. Bungener calls “an honourable329 and Christian difficulty” of choice, in frigid330 indecisions and insincere proposals. But Knox’s next letter is in a humbler tone; he has not found the negotiation331 so easy as he fancied; he despairs of the marriage altogether, and talks of leaving England, — regards not “what country consumes his wicked carcass.” “You shall understand,” he says, “that this sixth of November, I spoke with Sir Robert Bowes” (the head of the family, his bride’s uncle) “in the matter you know, according to your request; whose disdainful, yea, despiteful, words hath so pierced my heart that my life is bitter to me. I bear a good countenance with a sore troubled heart, because he that ought to consider matters with a deep judgment is become not only a despiser, but also a taunter332 of God’s messengers — God be merciful unto him! Amongst others his most unpleasing words, while that I was about to have declared my heart in the whole matter, he said, ‘Away with your rhetorical reasons! for I will not be persuaded with them.’ God knows I did use no rhetoric nor coloured speech; but would have spoken the truth, and that in most simple manner. I am not a good orator333 in my own cause; but what he would not be content to hear of me, God shall declare to him one day to his displeasure, unless he repent.” 97 Poor Knox, you see, is quite commoved. It has been a very unpleasant interview. And as it is the only sample that we have of how things went with him during his courtship, we may infer that the period was not as agreeable for Knox as it has been for some others.
93 IB. iii. 378.
94 LB. ii. 379.
95 Works, iii. 394.
96 Works, iii. 376.
97 Works, iii. 378.
However, when once they were married, I imagine he and Marjorie Bowes hit it off together comfortably enough. The little we know of it may be brought together in a very short space. She bore him two sons. He seems to have kept her pretty busy, and depended on her to some degree in his work; so that when she fell ill, his papers got at once into disorder. 98 Certainly she sometimes wrote to his dictation; and, in this capacity, he calls her “his left hand.” 99 In June 1559, at the headiest moment of the Reformation in Scotland, he writes regretting the absence of his helpful colleague, Goodman, “whose presence” (this is the not very grammatical form of his lament) “whose presence I more thirst, than she that is my own flesh.” 100 And this, considering the source and the circumstances, may be held as evidence of a very tender sentiment. He tells us himself in his history, on the occasion of a certain meeting at the Kirk of Field, that “he was in no small heaviness by reason of the late death of his dear bed-fellow, Marjorie Bowes.” 101 Calvin, condoling334 with him, speaks of her as “a wife whose like is not to be found everywhere” (that is very like Calvin), and again, as “the most delightful335 of wives.” We know what Calvin thought desirable in a wife, “good humour, chastity, thrift336, patience, and solicitude337 for her husband’s health,” and so we may suppose that the first Mrs. Knox fell not far short of this ideal.
98 Works, vi. 104.
99 IB. v. 5.
100 IB. vi. 27.
101 IB. ii. 138.
The actual date of the marriage is uncertain but by September 1566, at the latest, the Reformer was settled in Geneva with his wife. There is no fear either that he will be dull; even if the chaste338, thrifty339, patient Marjorie should not altogether occupy his mind, he need not go out of the house to seek more female sympathy; for behold! Mrs. Bowes is duly domesticated340 with the young couple. Dr. M’Crie imagined that Richard Bowes was now dead, and his widow, consequently, free to live where she would; and where could she go more naturally than to the house of a married daughter? This, however, is not the case. Richard Bowes did not die till at least two years later. It is impossible to believe that he approved of his wife’s desertion, after so many years of marriage, after twelve children had been born to them; and accordingly we find in his will, dated 1558, no mention either of her or of Knox’s wife. 102 This is plain sailing. It is easy enough to understand the anger of Bowes against this interloper, who had come into a quiet family, married the daughter in spite of the father’s opposition, alienated341 the wife from the husband and the husband’s religion, supported her in a long course of resistance and rebellion, and, after years of intimacy, already too close and tender for any jealous spirit to behold without resentment342, carried her away with him at last into a foreign land. But it is not quite easy to understand how, except out of sheer weariness and disgust, he was ever brought to agree to the arrangement. Nor is it easy to square the Reformer’s conduct with his public teaching. We have, for instance, a letter by him, Craig, and Spottiswood, to the Archbishops of Canterbury and York, anent “a wicked and rebellious343 woman,” one Anne Good, spouse65 to “John Barron, a minister of Christ Jesus his evangel,” who, “after great rebellion shown unto him, and divers344 admonitions given, as well by himself as by others in his name, that she should in no wise depart from this realm, nor from his house without his license345, hath not the less stubbornly and rebelliously346 departed, separated herself from his society, left his house, and withdrawn347 herself from this realm.” 103 Perhaps some sort of license was extorted348, as I have said, from Richard Bowes, weary with years of domestic dissension; but setting that aside, the words employed with so much righteous indignation by Knox, Craig, and Spottiswood, to describe the conduct of that wicked and rebellious woman, Mrs. Barron, would describe nearly as exactly the conduct of the religious Mrs. Bowes. It is a little bewildering, until we recollect349 the distinction between faithful and unfaithful husbands; for Barron was “a minister of Christ Jesus his evangel,” while Richard Bowes, besides being own brother to a despiser and taunter of God’s messengers, is shrewdly suspected to have been “a bigoted350 adherent351 of the Roman Catholic faith,” or, as Know himself would have expressed it, “a rotten Papist.”
102 Mr. Laing’s preface to the sixth volume of Knox’s Works, p. lxii.
103 Works. vi. 534.
You would have thought that Know was now pretty well supplied with female society. But we are not yet at the end of the roll. The last year of his sojourn in England had been spent principally in London, where he was resident as one of the chaplains of Edward the Sixth; and here he boasts, although a stranger, he had, by God’s grace, found favour before many. 104 The godly women of the metropolis352 made much of him; once he writes to Mrs. Bowes that her last letter had found him closeted with three, and he and the three women were all in tears. 105 Out of all, however, he had chosen two. “GOD,” he writes to them, “BROUGHT US IN SUCH FAMILIAR ACQUAINTANCE, THAT YOUR HEARTS WERE INCENSED353 AND KINDLED354 WITH A SPECIAL CARE OVER ME, AS A MOTHER USETH TO BE OVER HER NATURAL CHILD; and my heart was opened and compelled in your presence to be more plain than ever I was to any.” 106 And out of the two even he had chosen one, Mrs. Anne Locke, wife to Mr. Harry355 Locke, merchant, nigh to Bow Kirk, Cheapside, in London, as the address runs. If one may venture to judge upon such imperfect evidence, this was the woman he loved best. I have a difficulty in quite forming to myself an idea of her character. She may have been one of the three tearful visitors before alluded356 to; she may even have been that one of them who was so profoundly moved by some passages of Mrs. Bowes’s letter, which the Reformer opened, and read aloud to them before they went. “O would to God,” cried this impressionable matron, “would to God that I might speak with that person, for I perceive there are more tempted than I.” 107 This may have been Mrs. Locke, as I say; but even if it were, we must not conclude from this one fact that she was such another as Mrs. Bowes. All the evidence tends the other way. She was a woman of understanding, plainly, who followed political events with interest, and to whom Knox thought it worth while to write, in detail, the history of his trials and successes. She was religious, but without that morbid357 perversity358 of spirit that made religion so heavy a burden for the poor-hearted Mrs. Bowes. More of her I do not find, save testimony359 to the profound affection that united her to the Reformer. So we find him writing to her from Geneva, in such terms as these:- “You write that your desire is earnest to see me. DEAR SISTER, IF I SHOULD EXPRESS THE THIRST AND LANGUOR360 WHICH I HAVE HAD FOR YOUR PRESENCE, I SHOULD APPEAR TO PASS MEASURE . . . YEA, I WEEP AND REJOICE IN REMEMBRANCE OF YOU; but that would evanish by the comfort of your presence, which I assure you is so dear to me, that if the charge of this little flock here, gathered together in Christ’s name, did not impede321 me, my coming should prevent my letter.” 108 I say that this was written from Geneva; and yet you will observe that it is no consideration for his wife or mother-in-law, only the charge of his little flock, that keeps him from setting out forthwith for London, to comfort himself with the dear presence of Mrs. Locke. Remember that was a certain plausible361 enough pretext362 for Mrs. Locke to come to Geneva — “the most perfect school of Christ that ever was on earth since the days of the Apostles” — for we are now under the reign of that “horrible monster Jezebel of England,” when a lady of good orthodox sentiments was better out of London. It was doubtful, however, whether this was to be. She was detained in England, partly by circumstances unknown, “partly by empire of her head,” Mr. Harry Locke, the Cheapside merchant. It is somewhat humorous to see Knox struggling for resignation, now that he has to do with a faithful husband (for Mr. Harry Locke was faithful). Had it been otherwise, “in my heart,” he says, “I could have wished - yea,” here he breaks out, “yea, and cannot cease to wish — that God would guide you to this place.” 109 And after all, he had not long to wait, for, whether Mr. Harry Locke died in the interval363, or was wearied, he too, into giving permission, five months after the date of the letter last quoted, “Mrs. Anne Locke, Harry her son, and Anne her daughter, and Katherine her maid,” arrived in that perfect school of Christ, the Presbyterian paradise, Geneva. So now, and for the next two years, the cup of Knox’s happiness was surely full. Of an afternoon, when the bells rang out for the sermon, the shops closed, and the good folk gathered to the churches, psalm-book in hand, we can imagine him drawing near to the English chapel364 in quite patriarchal fashion, with Mrs. Knox and Mrs. Bowes and Mrs. Locke, James his servant, Patrick his pupil, and a due following of children and maids. He might be alone at work all morning in his study, for he wrote much during these two years; but at night, you may be sure there was a circle of admiring women, eager to hear the new paragraph, and not sparing of applause. And what work, among others, was he elaborating at this time, but the notorious “First Blast”? So that he may have rolled out in his big pulpit voice, how women were weak, frail, impatient, feeble, foolish, inconstant, variable, cruel, and lacking the spirit of counsel, and how men were above them, even as God is above the angels, in the ears of his own wife, and the two dearest friends he had on earth. But he had lost the sense of incongruity, and continued to despise in theory the sex he honoured so much in practice, of whom he chose his most intimate associates, and whose courage he was compelled to wonder at, when his own heart was faint.
104 Works, iv. 220.
105 IB. iii. 380.
106 IB. iv. 220.
107 Works, iii. 380.
108 Works, iv. 238.
109 Works, iv. 240.
We may say that such a man was not worthy of his fortune; and so, as he would not learn, he was taken away from that agreeable school, and his fellowship of women was broken up, not to be reunited. Called into Scotland to take at last that strange position in history which is his best claim to commemoration, he was followed thither365 by his wife and his mother-in-law. The wife soon died. The death of her daughter did not altogether separate Mrs. Bowes from Knox, but she seems to have come and gone between his house and England. In 1562, however, we find him characterised as “a sole man by reason of the absence of his mother-in-law, Mrs. Bowes,” and a passport is got for her, her man, a maid, and “three horses, whereof two shall return,” as well as liberty to take all her own money with her into Scotland. This looks like a definite arrangement; but whether she died at Edinburgh, or went back to England yet again, I cannot find.
With that great family of hers, unless in leaving her husband she had quarrelled with them all, there must have been frequent occasion for her presence, one would think. Knox at least survived her; and we possess his epigraph to their long intimacy, given to the world by him in an appendix to his latest publication. I have said in a former paper that Knox was not shy of personal revelations in his published works. And the trick seems to have grown on him. To this last tract135, a controversial onslaught on a Scottish Jesuit, he prefixed a prayer, not very pertinent366 to the matter in hand, and containing references to his family which were the occasion of some wit in his adversary’s answer; and appended what seems equally irrelevant367, one of his devout letters to Mrs. Bowes, with an explanatory preface. To say truth, I believe he had always felt uneasily that the circumstances of this intimacy were very capable of misconstruction; and now, when he was an old man, taking “his good night of all the faithful in both realms,” and only desirous “that without any notable sclander to the evangel of Jesus Christ, he might end his battle; for as the world was weary of him, so was he of it;” — in such a spirit it was not, perhaps, unnatural that he should return to this old story, and seek to put it right in the eyes of all men, ere he died. “Because that God,” he says, “because that God now in His mercy hath put an end to the battle of my dear mother, Mistress Elizabeth Bowes, before that He put an end to my wretched life, I could not cease but declare to the world what was the cause of our great familiarity and long acquaintance; which was neither flesh nor blood, but a troubled conscience upon her part, which never suffered her to rest but when she was in the company of the faithful, of whom (from the first hearing of the word at my mouth) she judged me to be one. . . . Her company to me was comfortable (yea, honourable and profitable, for she was to me and mine a mother), but yet it was not without some cross; for besides trouble and fashery of body sustained for her, my mind was seldom quiet, for doing somewhat for the comfort of her troubled conscience.” 110 He had written to her years before, from his first exile in Dieppe, that “only God’s hand” could withhold him from once more speaking with her face to face; and now, when God’s hand has indeed interposed, when there lies between them, instead of the voyageable straits, that great gulf368 over which no man can pass, this is the spirit in which he can look back upon their long acquaintance. She was a religious hypochondriac, it appears, whom, not without some cross and fashery of mind and body, he was good enough to tend. He might have given a truer character of their friendship, had he thought less of his own standing in public estimation, and more of the dead woman. But he was in all things, as Burke said of his son in that ever memorable369 passage, a public creature. He wished that even into this private place of his affections posterity should follow him with a complete approval; and he was willing, in order that this might be so, to exhibit the defects of his lost friend, and tell the world what weariness he had sustained through her unhappy disposition. There is something here that reminds one of Rousseau.
110 Works, vi. 513, 514.
I do not think he ever saw Mrs. Locke after he left Geneva; but his correspondence with her continued for three years. It may have continued longer, of course, but I think the last letters we possess read like the last that would be written. Perhaps Mrs. Locke was then remarried, for there is much obscurity over her subsequent history. For as long as their intimacy was kept up, at least, the human element remains in the Reformer’s life. Here is one passage, for example, the most likable utterance of Knox’s that I can quote:- Mrs Locke has been upbraiding370 him as a bad correspondent. “My remembrance of you,” he answers, “is not so dead, but I trust it shall be fresh enough, albeit it be renewed by no outward token for one year. OF NATURE, I AM CHURLISH; YET ONE THING I ASHAME NOT TO AFFIRM, THAT FAMILIARITY ONCE THOROUGHLY CONTRACTED WAS NEVER YET BROKEN ON MY DEFAULT. THE CAUSE MAY BE THAT I HAVE RATHER NEED OF ALL, THAN THAT ANY HAVE NEED OF ME. However it (THAT) be, it cannot be, as I say, the corporal absence of one year or two that can quench371 in my heart that familiar acquaintance in Christ Jesus, which half a year did engender372, and almost two years did nourish and confirm. And therefore, whether I write or no, be assuredly persuaded that I have you in such memory as becometh the faithful to have of the faithful.” 111 This is the truest touch of personal humility that I can remember to have seen in all the five volumes of the Reformer’s collected works: it is no small honour to Mrs. Locke that his affection for her should have brought home to him this unwonted feeling of dependence upon others. Everything else in the course of the correspondence testifies to a good, sound, down-right sort of friendship between the two, less ecstatic than it was at first, perhaps, but serviceable and very equal. He gives her ample details is to the progress of the work of reformation; sends her the sheets of the CONFESSION286 OF FAITH, “in quairs,” as he calls it; asks her to assist him with her prayers, to collect money for the good cause in Scotland, and to send him books for himself — books by Calvin especially, one on Isaiah, and a new revised edition of the “Institutes.” “I must be bold on your liberality,” he writes, “not only in that, but in greater things as I shall need.” 112 On her part she applies to him for spiritual advice, not after the manner of the drooping373 Mrs. Bowes, but in a more positive spirit, — advice as to practical points, advice as to the Church of England, for instance, whose ritual he condemns374 as a “mingle-mangle.” 113 Just at the end she ceases to write, sends him “a token, without writing.” “I understand your impediment,” he answers, “and therefore I cannot complain. Yet if you understood the variety of my temptations, I doubt not but you would have written somewhat.” 114 One letter more, and then silence.
111 Works, vi. ii.
112 Works, vi. pp. 21. 101, 108, 130.
113 IB. vi. 83.
114 IB. vi. 129.
And I think the best of the Reformer died out with that correspondence. It is after this, of course, that he wrote that ungenerous description of his intercourse with Mrs. Bowes. It is after this, also, that we come to the unlovely episode of his second marriage. He had been left a widower375 at the age of fifty-five. Three years after, it occurred apparently376 to yet another pious377 parent to sacrifice a child upon the altar of his respect for the Reformer. In January 1563, Randolph writes to Cecil: “Your Honour will take it for a great wonder when I shall write unto you that Mr. Knox shall marry a very near kinswoman of the Duke’s, a Lord’s daughter, a young lass not above sixteen years of age.” 115 He adds that he fears he will be laughed at for reporting so mad a story. And yet it was true; and on Palm Sunday, 1564, Margaret Stewart, daughter of Andrew Lord Stewart of Ochiltree, aged284 seventeen, was duly united to John Knox, Minister of St. Giles’s Kirk, Edinburgh, aged fifty-nine, — to the great disgust of Queen Mary from family pride, and I would fain hope of many others for more humane378 considerations. “In this,” as Randolph says, “I wish he had done otherwise.” The Consistory of Geneva, “that most perfect school of Christ that ever was on earth since the days of the Apostles,” were wont to forbid marriages on the ground of too great a disproportion in age. I cannot help wondering whether the old Reformer’s conscience did not uneasily remind him, now and again, of this good custom of his religious metropolis, as he thought of the two-and-forty years that separated him from his poor bride. Fitly enough, we hear nothing of the second Mrs. Knox until she appears at her husband’s deathbed, eight years after. She bore him three daughters in the interval; and I suppose the poor child’s martyrdom was made as easy for her as might be. She was extremely attentive379 to him “at the end, we read and he seems to have spoken to her with some confidence. Moreover, and this is very characteristic, he had copied out for her use a little volume of his own devotional letters to other women.
115 Works, vi. 532.
This is the end of the roll, unless we add to it Mrs. Adamson, who had delighted much in his company “by reason that she had a troubled conscience,” and whose deathbed is commemorated380 at some length in the pages of his history. 116
116 Works, i. 246.
And now, looking back, it cannot be said that Knox’s intercourse with women was quite of the highest sort. It is characteristic that we find him more alarmed for his own reputation than for the reputation of the women with whom he was familiar. There was a fatal preponderance of self in all his intimacies: many women came to learn from him, but he never condescended381 to become a learner in his turn. And so there is not anything idyllic382 in these intimacies of his; and they were never so renovating383 to his spirit as they might have been. But I believe they were good enough for the women. I fancy the women knew what they were about when so many of them followed after Knox. It is not simply because a man is always fully persuaded that he knows the right from the wrong and sees his way plainly through the maze384 of life, great qualities as these are, that people will love and follow him, and write him letters full of their “earnest desire for him” when he is absent. It is not over a man, whose one characteristic is grim fixity of purpose, that the hearts of women are “incensed and kindled with a special care,” as it were over their natural children. In the strong quiet patience of all his letters to the weariful Mrs. Bowes, we may perhaps see one cause of the fascination385 he possessed for these religious women. Here was one whom you could besiege386 all the year round with inconsistent scruples and complaints; you might write to him on Thursday that you were so elated it was plain the devil was deceiving you, and again on Friday that you were so depressed387 it was plain God had cast you off for ever; and he would read all this patiently and sympathetically, and give you an answer in the most reassuring388 polysyllables, and all divided into heads — who knows? — like a treatise389 on divinity. And then, those easy tears of his. There are some women who like to see men crying; and here was this great-voiced, bearded man of God, who might be seen beating the solid pulpit every Sunday, and casting abroad his clamorous390 denunciations to the terror of all, and who on the Monday would sit in their parlours by the hour, and weep with them over their manifold trials and temptations. Nowadays, he would have to drink a dish of tea with all these penitents391. . . . It sounds a little vulgar, as the past will do, if we look into it too closely. We could not let these great folk of old into our drawing-rooms. Queen Elizabeth would positively392 not be eligible393 for a housemaid. The old manners and the old customs go sinking from grade to grade, until, if some mighty394 emperor revisited the glimpses of the moon, he would not find any one of his way of thinking, any one he could strike hands with and talk to freely and without offence, save perhaps the porter at the end of the street, or the fellow with his elbows out who loafs all day before the public-house. So that this little note of vulgarity is not a thing to be dwelt upon; it is to be put away from us, as we recall the fashion of these old intimacies; so that we may only remember Knox as one who was very long-suffering with women, kind to them in his own way, loving them in his own way — and that not the worst way, if it was not the best — and once at least, if not twice, moved to his heart of hearts by a woman, and giving expression to the yearning he had for her society in words that none of us need be ashamed to borrow.
And let us bear in mind always that the period I have gone over in this essay begins when the Reformer was already beyond the middle age, and already broken in bodily health: it has been the story of an old man’s friendships. This it is that makes Knox enviable. Unknown until past forty, he had then before him five-and-thirty years of splendid and influential265 life, passed through uncommon395 hardships to an uncommon degree of power, lived in his own country as a sort of king, and did what he would with the sound of his voice out of the pulpit. And besides all this, such a following of faithful women! One would take the first forty years gladly, if one could be sure of the last thirty. Most of us, even if, by reason of great strength and the dignity of gray hairs, we retain some degree of public respect in the latter days of our existence, will find a falling away of friends, and a solitude396 making itself round about us day by day, until we are left alone with the hired sick-nurse. For the attraction of a man’s character is apt to be outlived, like the attraction of his body; and the power to love grows feeble in its turn, as well as the power to inspire love in others. It is only with a few rare natures that friendship is added to friendship, love to love, and the man keeps growing richer in affection — richer, I mean, as a bank may be said to grow richer, both giving and receiving more — after his head is white and his back weary, and he prepares to go down into the dust of death.
The End
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c711/8c7110c6592b18f6ee88b0c1624d2cff50b7bbbb" alt=""
点击
收听单词发音
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9800/d9800aa57a2817132ac898b1fdffe18ba341b3ed" alt="收听单词发音"
1
controversy
![]() |
|
n.争论,辩论,争吵 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2
havoc
![]() |
|
n.大破坏,浩劫,大混乱,大杂乱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3
immediate
![]() |
|
adj.立即的;直接的,最接近的;紧靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4
Christian
![]() |
|
adj.基督教徒的;n.基督教徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5
politic
![]() |
|
adj.有智虑的;精明的;v.从政 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6
thoroughly
![]() |
|
adv.完全地,彻底地,十足地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7
strenuously
![]() |
|
adv.奋发地,费力地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8
commonwealth
![]() |
|
n.共和国,联邦,共同体 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9
iniquities
![]() |
|
n.邪恶( iniquity的名词复数 );极不公正 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10
pageant
![]() |
|
n.壮观的游行;露天历史剧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11
professed
![]() |
|
公开声称的,伪称的,已立誓信教的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12
profess
![]() |
|
v.声称,冒称,以...为业,正式接受入教,表明信仰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13
condemned
![]() |
|
adj. 被责难的, 被宣告有罪的 动词condemn的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14
notably
![]() |
|
adv.值得注意地,显著地,尤其地,特别地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15
purely
![]() |
|
adv.纯粹地,完全地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16
opposition
![]() |
|
n.反对,敌对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17
strictly
![]() |
|
adv.严厉地,严格地;严密地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18
meddle
![]() |
|
v.干预,干涉,插手 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19
interfere
![]() |
|
v.(in)干涉,干预;(with)妨碍,打扰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20
galled
![]() |
|
v.使…擦痛( gall的过去式和过去分词 );擦伤;烦扰;侮辱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21
interpretation
![]() |
|
n.解释,说明,描述;艺术处理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22
incongruities
![]() |
|
n.不协调( incongruity的名词复数 );不一致;不适合;不协调的东西 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23
doctrine
![]() |
|
n.教义;主义;学说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24
nay
![]() |
|
adv.不;n.反对票,投反对票者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25
sincerity
![]() |
|
n.真诚,诚意;真实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26
expediency
![]() |
|
n.适宜;方便;合算;利己 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27
reign
![]() |
|
n.统治时期,统治,支配,盛行;v.占优势 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28
scent
![]() |
|
n.气味,香味,香水,线索,嗅觉;v.嗅,发觉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29
dedicated
![]() |
|
adj.一心一意的;献身的;热诚的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30
scotch
![]() |
|
n.伤口,刻痕;苏格兰威士忌酒;v.粉碎,消灭,阻止;adj.苏格兰(人)的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31
endorse
![]() |
|
vt.(支票、汇票等)背书,背署;批注;同意 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32
controversies
![]() |
|
争论 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33
jointly
![]() |
|
ad.联合地,共同地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34
banished
![]() |
|
v.放逐,驱逐( banish的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35
mar
![]() |
|
vt.破坏,毁坏,弄糟 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36
proscribed
![]() |
|
v.正式宣布(某事物)有危险或被禁止( proscribe的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37
guise
![]() |
|
n.外表,伪装的姿态 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38
tempting
![]() |
|
a.诱人的, 吸引人的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39
persecuted
![]() |
|
(尤指宗教或政治信仰的)迫害(~sb. for sth.)( persecute的过去式和过去分词 ); 烦扰,困扰或骚扰某人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40
anomalous
![]() |
|
adj.反常的;不规则的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41
incapable
![]() |
|
adj.无能力的,不能做某事的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42
conspicuous
![]() |
|
adj.明眼的,惹人注目的;炫耀的,摆阔气的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43
enthusiast
![]() |
|
n.热心人,热衷者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44
monasteries
![]() |
|
修道院( monastery的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45
cloisters
![]() |
|
n.(学院、修道院、教堂等建筑的)走廊( cloister的名词复数 );回廊;修道院的生活;隐居v.隐退,使与世隔绝( cloister的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46
incongruity
![]() |
|
n.不协调,不一致 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47
fully
![]() |
|
adv.完全地,全部地,彻底地;充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48
gallant
![]() |
|
adj.英勇的,豪侠的;(向女人)献殷勤的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49
immunities
![]() |
|
免除,豁免( immunity的名词复数 ); 免疫力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50
awe
![]() |
|
n.敬畏,惊惧;vt.使敬畏,使惊惧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51
scruple
![]() |
|
n./v.顾忌,迟疑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52
loyalty
![]() |
|
n.忠诚,忠心 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53
virtue
![]() |
|
n.德行,美德;贞操;优点;功效,效力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54
fictitious
![]() |
|
adj.虚构的,假设的;空头的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55
abashed
![]() |
|
adj.窘迫的,尴尬的v.使羞愧,使局促,使窘迫( abash的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56
regiment
![]() |
|
n.团,多数,管理;v.组织,编成团,统制 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57
trumpet
![]() |
|
n.喇叭,喇叭声;v.吹喇叭,吹嘘 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58
monstrous
![]() |
|
adj.巨大的;恐怖的;可耻的,丢脸的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59
dame
![]() |
|
n.女士 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60
dames
![]() |
|
n.(在英国)夫人(一种封号),夫人(爵士妻子的称号)( dame的名词复数 );女人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61
humble
![]() |
|
adj.谦卑的,恭顺的;地位低下的;v.降低,贬低 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62
persecution
![]() |
|
n. 迫害,烦扰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63
withhold
![]() |
|
v.拒绝,不给;使停止,阻挡 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64
espoused
![]() |
|
v.(决定)支持,拥护(目标、主张等)( espouse的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65
spouse
![]() |
|
n.配偶(指夫或妻) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
66
wholesome
![]() |
|
adj.适合;卫生的;有益健康的;显示身心健康的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
67
standing
![]() |
|
n.持续,地位;adj.永久的,不动的,直立的,不流动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
68
waive
![]() |
|
vt.放弃,不坚持(规定、要求、权力等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
69
delicacy
![]() |
|
n.精致,细微,微妙,精良;美味,佳肴 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
70
anonymous
![]() |
|
adj.无名的;匿名的;无特色的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
71
initiated
![]() |
|
n. 创始人 adj. 新加入的 vt. 开始,创始,启蒙,介绍加入 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
72
admonish
![]() |
|
v.训戒;警告;劝告 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
73
scruples
![]() |
|
n.良心上的不安( scruple的名词复数 );顾虑,顾忌v.感到于心不安,有顾忌( scruple的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
74
timorous
![]() |
|
adj.胆怯的,胆小的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
75
repent
![]() |
|
v.悔悟,悔改,忏悔,后悔 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
76
transgression
![]() |
|
n.违背;犯规;罪过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
77
abound
![]() |
|
vi.大量存在;(in,with)充满,富于 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
78
amend
![]() |
|
vt.修改,修订,改进;n.[pl.]赔罪,赔偿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
79
rumour
![]() |
|
n.谣言,谣传,传闻 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
80
censures
![]() |
|
v.指责,非难,谴责( censure的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
81
offenders
![]() |
|
n.冒犯者( offender的名词复数 );犯规者;罪犯;妨害…的人(或事物) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
82
debtors
![]() |
|
n.债务人,借方( debtor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
83
justify
![]() |
|
vt.证明…正当(或有理),为…辩护 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
84
adversaries
![]() |
|
n.对手,敌手( adversary的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
85
lawful
![]() |
|
adj.法律许可的,守法的,合法的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
86
whatsoever
![]() |
|
adv.(用于否定句中以加强语气)任何;pron.无论什么 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
87
antiquity
![]() |
|
n.古老;高龄;古物,古迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
88
sedition
![]() |
|
n.煽动叛乱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
89
tainted
![]() |
|
adj.腐坏的;污染的;沾污的;感染的v.使变质( taint的过去式和过去分词 );使污染;败坏;被污染,腐坏,败坏 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
90
purged
![]() |
|
清除(政敌等)( purge的过去式和过去分词 ); 涤除(罪恶等); 净化(心灵、风气等); 消除(错事等)的不良影响 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
91
degenerate
![]() |
|
v.退步,堕落;adj.退步的,堕落的;n.堕落者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
92
dominion
![]() |
|
n.统治,管辖,支配权;领土,版图 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
93
subversion
![]() |
|
n.颠覆,破坏 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
94
frail
![]() |
|
adj.身体虚弱的;易损坏的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
95
providence
![]() |
|
n.深谋远虑,天道,天意;远见;节约;上帝 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
96
esteemed
![]() |
|
adj.受人尊敬的v.尊敬( esteem的过去式和过去分词 );敬重;认为;以为 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
97
esteem
![]() |
|
n.尊敬,尊重;vt.尊重,敬重;把…看作 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
98
irrational
![]() |
|
adj.无理性的,失去理性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
99
withheld
![]() |
|
withhold过去式及过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
100
supreme
![]() |
|
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
101
logic
![]() |
|
n.逻辑(学);逻辑性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
102
phantom
![]() |
|
n.幻影,虚位,幽灵;adj.错觉的,幻影的,幽灵的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
103
ambiguity
![]() |
|
n.模棱两可;意义不明确 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
104
exhausted
![]() |
|
adj.极其疲惫的,精疲力尽的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
105
scripture
![]() |
|
n.经文,圣书,手稿;Scripture:(常用复数)《圣经》,《圣经》中的一段 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
106
formulated
![]() |
|
v.构想出( formulate的过去式和过去分词 );规划;确切地阐述;用公式表示 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
107
blasphemous
![]() |
|
adj.亵渎神明的,不敬神的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
108
maxim
![]() |
|
n.格言,箴言 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
109
triumphantly
![]() |
|
ad.得意洋洋地;得胜地;成功地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
110
testimonies
![]() |
|
(法庭上证人的)证词( testimony的名词复数 ); 证明,证据 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
111
herald
![]() |
|
vt.预示...的来临,预告,宣布,欢迎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
112
reigning
![]() |
|
adj.统治的,起支配作用的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
113
inordinate
![]() |
|
adj.无节制的;过度的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
114
obstinate
![]() |
|
adj.顽固的,倔强的,不易屈服的,较难治愈的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
115
peroration
![]() |
|
n.(演说等之)结论 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
116
vindicate
![]() |
|
v.为…辩护或辩解,辩明;证明…正确 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
117
rhetoric
![]() |
|
n.修辞学,浮夸之言语 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
118
reverberation
![]() |
|
反响; 回响; 反射; 反射物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
119
wont
![]() |
|
adj.习惯于;v.习惯;n.习惯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
120
emphasise
![]() |
|
vt.加强...的语气,强调,着重 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
121
spoke
![]() |
|
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
122
utterance
![]() |
|
n.用言语表达,话语,言语 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
123
utterances
![]() |
|
n.发声( utterance的名词复数 );说话方式;语调;言论 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
124
mere
![]() |
|
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
125
forth
![]() |
|
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
126
allusion
![]() |
|
n.暗示,间接提示 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
127
artistic
![]() |
|
adj.艺术(家)的,美术(家)的;善于艺术创作的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
128
accentuate
![]() |
|
v.着重,强调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
129
metaphor
![]() |
|
n.隐喻,暗喻 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
130
apprentice
![]() |
|
n.学徒,徒弟 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
131
stoutness
![]() |
|
坚固,刚毅 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
132
trumpets
![]() |
|
喇叭( trumpet的名词复数 ); 小号; 喇叭形物; (尤指)绽开的水仙花 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
133
blustering
![]() |
|
adj.狂风大作的,狂暴的v.外强中干的威吓( bluster的现在分词 );咆哮;(风)呼啸;狂吹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
134
decided
![]() |
|
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
135
tract
![]() |
|
n.传单,小册子,大片(土地或森林) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
136
treacherous
![]() |
|
adj.不可靠的,有暗藏的危险的;adj.背叛的,背信弃义的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
137
disciples
![]() |
|
n.信徒( disciple的名词复数 );门徒;耶稣的信徒;(尤指)耶稣十二门徒之一 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
138
heartily
![]() |
|
adv.衷心地,诚恳地,十分,很 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
139
martyr
![]() |
|
n.烈士,殉难者;vt.杀害,折磨,牺牲 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
140
indifference
![]() |
|
n.不感兴趣,不关心,冷淡,不在乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
141
deviation
![]() |
|
n.背离,偏离;偏差,偏向;离题 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
142
descend
![]() |
|
vt./vi.传下来,下来,下降 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
143
hereditary
![]() |
|
adj.遗传的,遗传性的,可继承的,世袭的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
144
ordained
![]() |
|
v.任命(某人)为牧师( ordain的过去式和过去分词 );授予(某人)圣职;(上帝、法律等)命令;判定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
145
peculiar
![]() |
|
adj.古怪的,异常的;特殊的,特有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
146
obedience
![]() |
|
n.服从,顺从 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
147
injustice
![]() |
|
n.非正义,不公正,不公平,侵犯(别人的)权利 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
148
absurdity
![]() |
|
n.荒谬,愚蠢;谬论 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
149
sect
![]() |
|
n.派别,宗教,学派,派系 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
150
virtuous
![]() |
|
adj.有品德的,善良的,贞洁的,有效力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
151
justified
![]() |
|
a.正当的,有理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
152
heresies
![]() |
|
n.异端邪说,异教( heresy的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
153
briefly
![]() |
|
adv.简单地,简短地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
154
disorder
![]() |
|
n.紊乱,混乱;骚动,骚乱;疾病,失调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
155
bishop
![]() |
|
n.主教,(国际象棋)象 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
156
behold
![]() |
|
v.看,注视,看到 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
157
anonymously
![]() |
|
ad.用匿名的方式 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
158
afterward
![]() |
|
adv.后来;以后 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
159
precipitate
![]() |
|
adj.突如其来的;vt.使突然发生;n.沉淀物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
160
adversary
![]() |
|
adj.敌手,对手 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
161
captious
![]() |
|
adj.难讨好的,吹毛求疵的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
162
unnatural
![]() |
|
adj.不自然的;反常的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
163
preclusive
![]() |
|
adj.除外的,妨碍的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
164
specially
![]() |
|
adv.特定地;特殊地;明确地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
165
monarchies
![]() |
|
n. 君主政体, 君主国, 君主政治 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
166
suffrage
![]() |
|
n.投票,选举权,参政权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
167
pricks
![]() |
|
刺痛( prick的名词复数 ); 刺孔; 刺痕; 植物的刺 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
168
brute
![]() |
|
n.野兽,兽性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
169
reprehend
![]() |
|
v.谴责,责难 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
170
folly
![]() |
|
n.愚笨,愚蠢,蠢事,蠢行,傻话 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
171
leaven
![]() |
|
v.使发酵;n.酵母;影响 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
172
bishops
![]() |
|
(基督教某些教派管辖大教区的)主教( bishop的名词复数 ); (国际象棋的)象 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
173
bracing
![]() |
|
adj.令人振奋的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
174
reverently
![]() |
|
adv.虔诚地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
175
reverent
![]() |
|
adj.恭敬的,虔诚的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
176
eloquent
![]() |
|
adj.雄辩的,口才流利的;明白显示出的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
177
vehement
![]() |
|
adj.感情强烈的;热烈的;(人)有强烈感情的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
178
adoration
![]() |
|
n.爱慕,崇拜 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
179
excellences
![]() |
|
n.卓越( excellence的名词复数 );(只用于所修饰的名词后)杰出的;卓越的;出类拔萃的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
180
simplicity
![]() |
|
n.简单,简易;朴素;直率,单纯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
181
attire
![]() |
|
v.穿衣,装扮[同]array;n.衣着;盛装 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
182
meekness
![]() |
|
n.温顺,柔和 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
183
meek
![]() |
|
adj.温顺的,逆来顺受的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
184
devoted
![]() |
|
adj.忠诚的,忠实的,热心的,献身于...的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
185
juncture
![]() |
|
n.时刻,关键时刻,紧要关头 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
186
kindle
![]() |
|
v.点燃,着火 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
187
fusion
![]() |
|
n.溶化;熔解;熔化状态,熔和;熔接 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
188
jealousies
![]() |
|
n.妒忌( jealousy的名词复数 );妒羡 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
189
heresy
![]() |
|
n.异端邪说;异教 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
190
brotherhood
![]() |
|
n.兄弟般的关系,手中情谊 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
191
creed
![]() |
|
n.信条;信念,纲领 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
192
reluctance
![]() |
|
n.厌恶,讨厌,勉强,不情愿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
193
sanctuary
![]() |
|
n.圣所,圣堂,寺庙;禁猎区,保护区 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
194
sojourn
![]() |
|
v./n.旅居,寄居;逗留 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
195
inclination
![]() |
|
n.倾斜;点头;弯腰;斜坡;倾度;倾向;爱好 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
196
testament
![]() |
|
n.遗嘱;证明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
197
avowed
![]() |
|
adj.公开声明的,承认的v.公开声明,承认( avow的过去式和过去分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
198
miserable
![]() |
|
adj.悲惨的,痛苦的;可怜的,糟糕的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
199
obnoxious
![]() |
|
adj.极恼人的,讨人厌的,可憎的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
200
imprisonment
![]() |
|
n.关押,监禁,坐牢 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
201
snarl
![]() |
|
v.吼叫,怒骂,纠缠,混乱;n.混乱,缠结,咆哮 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
202
potent
![]() |
|
adj.强有力的,有权势的;有效力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
203
worthy
![]() |
|
adj.(of)值得的,配得上的;有价值的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
204
fervent
![]() |
|
adj.热的,热烈的,热情的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
205
humiliated
![]() |
|
感到羞愧的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
206
unconditionally
![]() |
|
adv.无条件地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
207
utterly
![]() |
|
adv.完全地,绝对地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
208
miraculous
![]() |
|
adj.像奇迹一样的,不可思议的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
209
afflicted
![]() |
|
使受痛苦,折磨( afflict的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
210
vessel
![]() |
|
n.船舶;容器,器皿;管,导管,血管 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
211
wondrous
![]() |
|
adj.令人惊奇的,奇妙的;adv.惊人地;异乎寻常地;令人惊叹地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
212
ordinances
![]() |
|
n.条例,法令( ordinance的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
213
ingratitude
![]() |
|
n.忘恩负义 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
214
amplification
![]() |
|
n.扩大,发挥 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
215
entirely
![]() |
|
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
216
humbles
![]() |
|
v.使谦恭( humble的第三人称单数 );轻松打败(尤指强大的对手);低声下气 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
217
consistency
![]() |
|
n.一贯性,前后一致,稳定性;(液体的)浓度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
218
noted
![]() |
|
adj.著名的,知名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
219
jealousy
![]() |
|
n.妒忌,嫉妒,猜忌 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
220
discretion
![]() |
|
n.谨慎;随意处理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
221
accomplice
![]() |
|
n.从犯,帮凶,同谋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
222
majesty
![]() |
|
n.雄伟,壮丽,庄严,威严;最高权威,王权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
223
crafty
![]() |
|
adj.狡猾的,诡诈的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
224
intemperate
![]() |
|
adj.无节制的,放纵的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
225
vigour
![]() |
|
(=vigor)n.智力,体力,精力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
226
picturesque
![]() |
|
adj.美丽如画的,(语言)生动的,绘声绘色的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
227
haughty
![]() |
|
adj.傲慢的,高傲的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
228
evaded
![]() |
|
逃避( evade的过去式和过去分词 ); 避开; 回避; 想不出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
229
judgments
![]() |
|
判断( judgment的名词复数 ); 鉴定; 评价; 审判 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
230
judgment
![]() |
|
n.审判;判断力,识别力,看法,意见 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
231
disallow
![]() |
|
v.不允许;拒绝 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
232
defile
![]() |
|
v.弄污,弄脏;n.(山间)小道 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
233
affixed
![]() |
|
adj.[医]附着的,附着的v.附加( affix的过去式和过去分词 );粘贴;加以;盖(印章) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
234
dilemma
![]() |
|
n.困境,进退两难的局面 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
235
procuring
![]() |
|
v.(努力)取得, (设法)获得( procure的现在分词 );拉皮条 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
236
arrogance
![]() |
|
n.傲慢,自大 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
237
albeit
![]() |
|
conj.即使;纵使;虽然 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
238
unreasonable
![]() |
|
adj.不讲道理的,不合情理的,过度的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
239
decrepit
![]() |
|
adj.衰老的,破旧的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
240
abide
![]() |
|
vi.遵守;坚持;vt.忍受 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
241
garble
![]() |
|
v.曲解,窜改 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
242
tacking
![]() |
|
(帆船)抢风行驶,定位焊[铆]紧钉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
243
calumniator
![]() |
|
n.中伤者,诽谤者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
244
hearsay
![]() |
|
n.谣传,风闻 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
245
mattress
![]() |
|
n.床垫,床褥 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
246
possessed
![]() |
|
adj.疯狂的;拥有的,占有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
247
remains
![]() |
|
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
248
posterity
![]() |
|
n.后裔,子孙,后代 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
249
browbeating
![]() |
|
v.(以言辞或表情)威逼,恫吓( browbeat的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
250
vexed
![]() |
|
adj.争论不休的;(指问题等)棘手的;争论不休的问题;烦恼的v.使烦恼( vex的过去式和过去分词 );使苦恼;使生气;详细讨论 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
251
yearning
![]() |
|
a.渴望的;向往的;怀念的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
252
vehemence
![]() |
|
n.热切;激烈;愤怒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
253
repentance
![]() |
|
n.懊悔 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
254
hardy
![]() |
|
adj.勇敢的,果断的,吃苦的;耐寒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
255
circumspect
![]() |
|
adj.慎重的,谨慎的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
256
disposition
![]() |
|
n.性情,性格;意向,倾向;排列,部署 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
257
underlying
![]() |
|
adj.在下面的,含蓄的,潜在的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
258
aspiration
![]() |
|
n.志向,志趣抱负;渴望;(语)送气音;吸出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
259
humility
![]() |
|
n.谦逊,谦恭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
260
intercourse
![]() |
|
n.性交;交流,交往,交际 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
261
strutting
![]() |
|
加固,支撑物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
262
sterling
![]() |
|
adj.英币的(纯粹的,货真价实的);n.英国货币(英镑) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
263
underneath
![]() |
|
adj.在...下面,在...底下;adv.在下面 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
264
influentially
![]() |
|
adv.有影响地;有力地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
265
influential
![]() |
|
adj.有影响的,有权势的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
266
urbane
![]() |
|
adj.温文尔雅的,懂礼的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
267
bosom
![]() |
|
n.胸,胸部;胸怀;内心;adj.亲密的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
268
mutual
![]() |
|
adj.相互的,彼此的;共同的,共有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
269
admiration
![]() |
|
n.钦佩,赞美,羡慕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
270
impersonal
![]() |
|
adj.无个人感情的,与个人无关的,非人称的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
271
chivalry
![]() |
|
n.骑士气概,侠义;(男人)对女人彬彬有礼,献殷勤 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
272
passionate
![]() |
|
adj.热情的,热烈的,激昂的,易动情的,易怒的,性情暴躁的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
273
disinterestedness
![]() |
|
参考例句: |
|
|
274
gratuity
![]() |
|
n.赏钱,小费 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
275
robustly
![]() |
|
adv.要用体力地,粗鲁地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
276
oar
![]() |
|
n.桨,橹,划手;v.划行 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
277
steadfastly
![]() |
|
adv.踏实地,不变地;岿然;坚定不渝 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
278
tempted
![]() |
|
v.怂恿(某人)干不正当的事;冒…的险(tempt的过去分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
279
scrupulous
![]() |
|
adj.审慎的,小心翼翼的,完全的,纯粹的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
280
intimacies
![]() |
|
亲密( intimacy的名词复数 ); 密切; 亲昵的言行; 性行为 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
281
embellished
![]() |
|
v.美化( embellish的过去式和过去分词 );装饰;修饰;润色 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
282
scraps
![]() |
|
油渣 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
283
perils
![]() |
|
极大危险( peril的名词复数 ); 危险的事(或环境) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
284
aged
![]() |
|
adj.年老的,陈年的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
285
gathering
![]() |
|
n.集会,聚会,聚集 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
286
confession
![]() |
|
n.自白,供认,承认 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
287
proprieties
![]() |
|
n.礼仪,礼节;礼貌( propriety的名词复数 );规矩;正当;合适 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
288
stint
![]() |
|
v.节省,限制,停止;n.舍不得化,节约,限制;连续不断的一段时间从事某件事 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
289
caresses
![]() |
|
爱抚,抚摸( caress的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
290
niggardly
![]() |
|
adj.吝啬的,很少的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
291
dependence
![]() |
|
n.依靠,依赖;信任,信赖;隶属 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
292
gist
![]() |
|
n.要旨;梗概 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
293
contrived
![]() |
|
adj.不自然的,做作的;虚构的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
294
penitent
![]() |
|
adj.后悔的;n.后悔者;忏悔者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
295
remits
![]() |
|
n.职权范围,控制范围,影响范围( remit的名词复数 )v.免除(债务),宽恕( remit的第三人称单数 );使某事缓和;寄回,传送 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
296
gem
![]() |
|
n.宝石,珠宝;受爱戴的人 [同]jewel | |
参考例句: |
|
|
297
crudity
![]() |
|
n.粗糙,生硬;adj.粗略的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
298
brutality
![]() |
|
n.野蛮的行为,残忍,野蛮 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
299
opportune
![]() |
|
adj.合适的,适当的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
300
wade
![]() |
|
v.跋涉,涉水;n.跋涉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
301
heed
![]() |
|
v.注意,留意;n.注意,留心 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
302
iniquity
![]() |
|
n.邪恶;不公正 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
303
tenor
![]() |
|
n.男高音(歌手),次中音(乐器),要旨,大意 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
304
zeal
![]() |
|
n.热心,热情,热忱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
305
captivity
![]() |
|
n.囚禁;被俘;束缚 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
306
galley
![]() |
|
n.(飞机或船上的)厨房单层甲板大帆船;军舰舰长用的大划艇; | |
参考例句: |
|
|
307
privy
![]() |
|
adj.私用的;隐密的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
308
tormented
![]() |
|
饱受折磨的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
309
gravel
![]() |
|
n.砂跞;砂砾层;结石 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
310
faculty
![]() |
|
n.才能;学院,系;(学院或系的)全体教学人员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
311
eloquence
![]() |
|
n.雄辩;口才,修辞 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
312
devout
![]() |
|
adj.虔诚的,虔敬的,衷心的 (n.devoutness) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
313
solicitous
![]() |
|
adj.热切的,挂念的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
314
dolorous
![]() |
|
adj.悲伤的;忧愁的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
315
lament
![]() |
|
n.悲叹,悔恨,恸哭;v.哀悼,悔恨,悲叹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
316
displease
![]() |
|
vt.使不高兴,惹怒;n.不悦,不满,生气 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
317
disquiet
![]() |
|
n.担心,焦虑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
318
intimacy
![]() |
|
n.熟悉,亲密,密切关系,亲昵的言行 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
319
slander
![]() |
|
n./v.诽谤,污蔑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
320
impeded
![]() |
|
阻碍,妨碍,阻止( impede的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
321
impede
![]() |
|
v.妨碍,阻碍,阻止 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
322
allayed
![]() |
|
v.减轻,缓和( allay的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
323
countenance
![]() |
|
n.脸色,面容;面部表情;vt.支持,赞同 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
324
bind
![]() |
|
vt.捆,包扎;装订;约束;使凝固;vi.变硬 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
325
parsimony
![]() |
|
n.过度节俭,吝啬 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
326
literally
![]() |
|
adv.照字面意义,逐字地;确实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
327
obdurately
![]() |
|
adv.顽固地,执拗地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
328
chivalrous
![]() |
|
adj.武士精神的;对女人彬彬有礼的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
329
honourable
![]() |
|
adj.可敬的;荣誉的,光荣的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
330
frigid
![]() |
|
adj.寒冷的,凛冽的;冷淡的;拘禁的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
331
negotiation
![]() |
|
n.谈判,协商 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
332
taunter
![]() |
|
taunt(嘲笑,奚落;辱骂;说挖苦话)的变形 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
333
orator
![]() |
|
n.演说者,演讲者,雄辩家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
334
condoling
![]() |
|
v.表示同情,吊唁( condole的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
335
delightful
![]() |
|
adj.令人高兴的,使人快乐的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
336
thrift
![]() |
|
adj.节约,节俭;n.节俭,节约 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
337
solicitude
![]() |
|
n.焦虑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
338
chaste
![]() |
|
adj.贞洁的;有道德的;善良的;简朴的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
339
thrifty
![]() |
|
adj.节俭的;兴旺的;健壮的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
340
domesticated
![]() |
|
adj.喜欢家庭生活的;(指动物)被驯养了的v.驯化( domesticate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
341
alienated
![]() |
|
adj.感到孤独的,不合群的v.使疏远( alienate的过去式和过去分词 );使不友好;转让;让渡(财产等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
342
resentment
![]() |
|
n.怨愤,忿恨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
343
rebellious
![]() |
|
adj.造反的,反抗的,难控制的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
344
divers
![]() |
|
adj.不同的;种种的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
345
license
![]() |
|
n.执照,许可证,特许;v.许可,特许 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
346
rebelliously
![]() |
|
adv.造反地,难以控制地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
347
withdrawn
![]() |
|
vt.收回;使退出;vi.撤退,退出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
348
extorted
![]() |
|
v.敲诈( extort的过去式和过去分词 );曲解 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
349
recollect
![]() |
|
v.回忆,想起,记起,忆起,记得 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
350
bigoted
![]() |
|
adj.固执己见的,心胸狭窄的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
351
adherent
![]() |
|
n.信徒,追随者,拥护者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
352
metropolis
![]() |
|
n.首府;大城市 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
353
incensed
![]() |
|
盛怒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
354
kindled
![]() |
|
(使某物)燃烧,着火( kindle的过去式和过去分词 ); 激起(感情等); 发亮,放光 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
355
harry
![]() |
|
vt.掠夺,蹂躏,使苦恼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
356
alluded
![]() |
|
提及,暗指( allude的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
357
morbid
![]() |
|
adj.病的;致病的;病态的;可怕的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
358
perversity
![]() |
|
n.任性;刚愎自用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
359
testimony
![]() |
|
n.证词;见证,证明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
360
languor
![]() |
|
n.无精力,倦怠 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
361
plausible
![]() |
|
adj.似真实的,似乎有理的,似乎可信的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
362
pretext
![]() |
|
n.借口,托词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
363
interval
![]() |
|
n.间隔,间距;幕间休息,中场休息 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
364
chapel
![]() |
|
n.小教堂,殡仪馆 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
365
thither
![]() |
|
adv.向那里;adj.在那边的,对岸的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
366
pertinent
![]() |
|
adj.恰当的;贴切的;中肯的;有关的;相干的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
367
irrelevant
![]() |
|
adj.不恰当的,无关系的,不相干的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
368
gulf
![]() |
|
n.海湾;深渊,鸿沟;分歧,隔阂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
369
memorable
![]() |
|
adj.值得回忆的,难忘的,特别的,显著的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
370
upbraiding
![]() |
|
adj.& n.谴责(的)v.责备,申斥,谴责( upbraid的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
371
quench
![]() |
|
vt.熄灭,扑灭;压制 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
372
engender
![]() |
|
v.产生,引起 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
373
drooping
![]() |
|
adj. 下垂的,无力的 动词droop的现在分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
374
condemns
![]() |
|
v.(通常因道义上的原因而)谴责( condemn的第三人称单数 );宣判;宣布…不能使用;迫使…陷于不幸的境地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
375
widower
![]() |
|
n.鳏夫 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
376
apparently
![]() |
|
adv.显然地;表面上,似乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
377
pious
![]() |
|
adj.虔诚的;道貌岸然的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
378
humane
![]() |
|
adj.人道的,富有同情心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
379
attentive
![]() |
|
adj.注意的,专心的;关心(别人)的,殷勤的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
380
commemorated
![]() |
|
v.纪念,庆祝( commemorate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
381
condescended
![]() |
|
屈尊,俯就( condescend的过去式和过去分词 ); 故意表示和蔼可亲 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
382
idyllic
![]() |
|
adj.质朴宜人的,田园风光的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
383
renovating
![]() |
|
翻新,修复,整修( renovate的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
384
maze
![]() |
|
n.迷宫,八阵图,混乱,迷惑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
385
fascination
![]() |
|
n.令人着迷的事物,魅力,迷恋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
386
besiege
![]() |
|
vt.包围,围攻,拥在...周围 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
387
depressed
![]() |
|
adj.沮丧的,抑郁的,不景气的,萧条的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
388
reassuring
![]() |
|
a.使人消除恐惧和疑虑的,使人放心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
389
treatise
![]() |
|
n.专著;(专题)论文 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
390
clamorous
![]() |
|
adj.吵闹的,喧哗的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
391
penitents
![]() |
|
n.后悔者( penitent的名词复数 );忏悔者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
392
positively
![]() |
|
adv.明确地,断然,坚决地;实在,确实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
393
eligible
![]() |
|
adj.有条件被选中的;(尤指婚姻等)合适(意)的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
394
mighty
![]() |
|
adj.强有力的;巨大的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
395
uncommon
![]() |
|
adj.罕见的,非凡的,不平常的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
396
solitude
![]() |
|
n. 孤独; 独居,荒僻之地,幽静的地方 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |