In Homer and the Epic1, ten or twelve years ago, I examined the literary objections to Homeric unity2. These objections are chiefly based on alleged3 discrepancies4 in the narrative5, of which no one poet, it is supposed, could have been guilty. The critics repose6, I venture to think, mainly on a fallacy. We may style it the fallacy of “the analytical7 reader.” The poet is expected to satisfy a minutely critical reader, a personage whom he could not foresee, and whom he did not address. Nor are “contradictory instances” examined — that is, as Blass has recently reminded his countrymen, Homer is put to a test which Goethe could not endure. No long fictitious8 narrative can satisfy “the analytical reader.”
The fallacy is that of disregarding the Homeric poet’s audience. He did not sing for Aristotle or for Aristarchus, or for modern minute and reflective inquirers, but for warriors9 and ladies. He certainly satisfied them; but if he does not satisfy microscopic10 professors, he is described as a syndicate of many minstrels, living in many ages.
In the present volume little is said in defence of the poet’s consistency11. Several chapters on that point have been excised12. The way of living which Homer describes is examined, and an effort is made to prove that he depicts13 the life of a single brief age of culture. The investigation14 is compelled to a tedious minuteness, because the points of attack — the alleged discrepancies in descriptions of the various details of existence — are so minute as to be all but invisible.
The unity of the Epics15 is not so important a topic as the methods of criticism. They ought to be sober, logical, and self-consistent. When these qualities are absent, Homeric criticism may be described, in the recent words of Blass, as “a swamp haunted by wandering fires, will o’ the wisps.”
In our country many of the most eminent17 scholars are no believers in separatist criticism. Justly admiring the industry and erudition of the separatists, they are unmoved by their arguments, to which they do not reply, being convinced in their own minds. But the number and perseverance18 of the separatists make on “the general reader” the impression that Homeric unity is chose jugée, that scientia locuta est, and has condemned19 Homer. This is far from being the case: the question is still open; “science” herself is subject to criticism; and new materials, accruing20 yearly, forbid a tame acquiescence21 in hasty theories.
May I say a word to the lovers of poetry who, in reading Homer, feel no more doubt than in reading Milton that, on the whole, they are studying a work of one age, by one author? Do not let them be driven from their natural impression by the statement that Science has decided22 against them. The certainties of the exact sciences are one thing: the opinions of Homeric commentators23 are other and very different things. Among all the branches of knowledge which the Homeric critic should have at his command, only philology24, archaeology25, and anthropology26 can be called “sciences”; and they are not exact sciences: they are but skirmishing advances towards the true solution of problems prehistoric27 and “proto-historic.”
Our knowledge shifts from day to day; on every hand, in regard to almost every topic discussed, we find conflict of opinions. There is no certain scientific decision, but there is the possibility of working in the scientific spirit, with breadth of comparison; consistency of logic16; economy of conjecture28; abstinence from the piling of hypothesis on hypothesis.
Nothing can be more hurtful to science than the dogmatic assumption that the hypothesis most in fashion is scientific.
Twenty years ago, the philological29 theory of the Solar Myth was preached as “scientific” in the books, primers, and lectures of popular science. To-day its place knows it no more. The separatist theories of the Homeric poems are not more secure than the Solar Myth, “like a wave shall they pass and be passed.”
When writing on “The Homeric House” (Chapter X.) I was unacquainted with Mr. Percy Gardner’s essay, “The Palaces of Homer” (Journal of Hellenic Studies, vol. iii. pp. 264–282). Mr. Gardner says that Dasent’s plan of the Scandinavian Hall “offers in most respects not likeness30, but a striking contrast to the early Greek hall.” Mr. Monro, who was not aware of the parallel which I had drawn31 between the Homeric and Icelandic houses, accepted it on evidence more recent than that of Sir George Dasent. Cf. his Odyssey32, vol. ii. pp. 490–494.
Mr. R. W. Raper33, of Trinity College, Oxford34, has read the proof sheets of this work with his habitual35 kindness, but is in no way responsible for the arguments. Mr. Walter Leaf has also obliged me by mentioning some points as to which I had not completely understood his position, and I have tried as far as possible to represent his ideas correctly. I have also received assistance from the wide and minute Homeric lore36 of Mr. A. Shewan, of St. Andrews, and have been allowed to consult other scholars on various points.
The first portion of the chapter on “Bronze and Iron” appeared in the Revue Archéologique for April 1905, and the editor, Monsieur Salomon Reinach, obliged me with a note on the bad iron swords of the Celts as described by Polybius.
The design of men in three shields of different shapes, from a Dipylon vase, is reproduced, with permission, from the British Museum Guide to the Antiquities38 of the Iron Age; and the shielded chessmen from Catalogue of Scottish Society of Antiquaries. Thanks for the two ships with men under shield are offered to the Rev37. Mr. Browne, S.J., author of Handbook of Homeric Studies (Longmans). For the Mycenaean gold corslet I thank Mr. John Murray (Schliemann’s Mycenae and Tiryns), and for all the other Mycenaean illustrations Messrs. Macmillan and Mr. Leaf, publishers and author of Mr. Leaf’s edition of the Iliad.
1 epic | |
n.史诗,叙事诗;adj.史诗般的,壮丽的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 unity | |
n.团结,联合,统一;和睦,协调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 alleged | |
a.被指控的,嫌疑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 discrepancies | |
n.差异,不符合(之处),不一致(之处)( discrepancy的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 narrative | |
n.叙述,故事;adj.叙事的,故事体的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 repose | |
v.(使)休息;n.安息 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 analytical | |
adj.分析的;用分析法的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 fictitious | |
adj.虚构的,假设的;空头的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 warriors | |
武士,勇士,战士( warrior的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 microscopic | |
adj.微小的,细微的,极小的,显微的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 consistency | |
n.一贯性,前后一致,稳定性;(液体的)浓度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 excised | |
v.切除,删去( excise的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 depicts | |
描绘,描画( depict的第三人称单数 ); 描述 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 investigation | |
n.调查,调查研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 epics | |
n.叙事诗( epic的名词复数 );壮举;惊人之举;史诗般的电影(或书籍) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 logic | |
n.逻辑(学);逻辑性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 eminent | |
adj.显赫的,杰出的,有名的,优良的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 perseverance | |
n.坚持不懈,不屈不挠 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 condemned | |
adj. 被责难的, 被宣告有罪的 动词condemn的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 accruing | |
v.增加( accrue的现在分词 );(通过自然增长)产生;获得;(使钱款、债务)积累 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 acquiescence | |
n.默许;顺从 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 commentators | |
n.评论员( commentator的名词复数 );时事评论员;注释者;实况广播员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 philology | |
n.语言学;语文学 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 archaeology | |
n.考古学 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 anthropology | |
n.人类学 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 prehistoric | |
adj.(有记载的)历史以前的,史前的,古老的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 conjecture | |
n./v.推测,猜测 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 philological | |
adj.语言学的,文献学的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 likeness | |
n.相像,相似(之处) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 drawn | |
v.拖,拉,拔出;adj.憔悴的,紧张的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 odyssey | |
n.长途冒险旅行;一连串的冒险 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 raper | |
[法] 强奸犯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 Oxford | |
n.牛津(英国城市) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 habitual | |
adj.习惯性的;通常的,惯常的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 lore | |
n.传说;学问,经验,知识 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 rev | |
v.发动机旋转,加快速度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 antiquities | |
n.古老( antiquity的名词复数 );古迹;古人们;古代的风俗习惯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |