Basil returned, bringing with him the great bird. It was a female—as Lucien knew—and one of the largest, being over twelve pounds in weight, and measuring seven feet between the tips of the wings when expanded. The bird of this species rarely exceeds eight pounds in weight, and is proportionately small in other respects.
The white-headed eagle (Falco leucocephalus), or “bald eagle,” as he is generally called because his white head gives him somewhat of a bald appearance—has been adopted by the United States as the emblem1 of their Republic. If his disposition2 be considered, he would be a more fit emblem for a band of robbers—for a more absolute robber and tyrant3 does not exist among the feathered races. He robs the osprey of his fish, and the vulture of his carrion5; in short, lords it over every creature weaker than himself. Now this is not the character of the nation he represents—far from it. It is true they have shown a desire to extend their territory, and have made conquests to this end. But what is the motive6 of these conquests? Is it to enslave and render tribute? No. They conquer not to enslave, but to make free! There are two motives7 for Anglo-American—I may say Anglo-Saxon, conquest, for true Englishmen feel these motives as much as Americans do. They wish to bring the whole world under a liberal form of government—one that will bear the scrutiny8 of reason—one that in time may extinguish crime, and render poverty a thing of the past—one that is not a patent usurpation9 and a robbery—a robbery perhaps more criminal in the eyes of God than waylaying10 on the highroad, or piracy11 on the high seas—more criminal, because more extensive in its fatal effects. Anglo-Saxons wish to destroy despotism, lest they or their descendants might again become what their ancestors once were—its victims. This, then, is one motive of their conquests, and it is nothing more than the naked instinct of self-preservation. But there is another motive—a nobler and more generous one. They have drunk from the cup of Liberty—the draught12 has pleased them, has given them happiness and joy; and, urged by that better part of our nature, they wish to share that sweet cup—ample for all—with all men. This is the true motive of the conquest of civilisation13; and under the banner of such a cause, it is a question whether war and anarchy14 and confusion be not preferable to the deceptive15 peace and apparent prosperity of despotism, that, like the death-dealing vampire16, soothes17 while it destroys.
I do not say that all Americans nor all Englishmen are entitled to the glory of such a holy motive for conquest. No. Too large a proportion, alas18! are actuated only by the ignoble19 idea of selfish or national aggrandisement. The robber is often found in the same camp, and fighting under the same banner, with the soldier of Freedom. It is not strange, therefore, that the true sons of Liberty should sometimes be associated with its bastard20 children of the shackle21 and the whip.
But, I shall not weary you with any more political science. Not that I consider it of small importance to you. On the contrary, I deem that science the most important of all others that have ever occupied the attention of men. Its influence extends to almost every object around you. It shapes the carriage in which you ride, and the ship in which you sail. Its knowledge modifies the nature of your soul, and decides whether you shall be a slave or a freeman. It even extends to the form of your body, giving it the abject22 attitude and gloomy aspect of slavery and guilt23, or the bold, upright carriage and joyous24 look of virtue25, which God gave to the first man when He made him after His own image.
But come, boy reader! I have promised not to weary you with these things. Such teachings I must reserve for a future opportunity; when, God willing, I shall present them to intellects older than yours. Perhaps you yourselves may then be old enough to take an interest in them; and if so, you may learn some truths that for long years have been the study of your friend—the author.
Now let us return to the eagle. I am thinking what a pity it is that the Americans should have chosen this tyrant-bird as the emblem of their liberty; for, although he is most appropriate for one portion of their people, he is far from being a fit emblem of the principles of the great republic. So thought the wise Franklin. There are many other animals, peculiar26 to the territory of the United States, far more deserving of the distinction. There is the bold but harmless buffalo27, the stately elk28, and the industrious29 beaver30; or if a bird must needs be upon the banner, where could one be found better suited to that end than the wild-turkey, possessing as he does a combination of good qualities—grace, beauty, courage, and usefulness? Thus reasoned Franklin; and it might be yet worth the while of the American people to give consideration to his reasoning, and discard the eagle; or, at all events, change the species—for peculiar to the United States territory there is another bird of the kind, far nobler, as well as larger and more beautiful.
It is curious to observe how many countries have adopted this rapacious31 bird for their emblem; and it forms a sad index to the motives that have hitherto actuated nations. In ancient times it was seen upon the banners of Persia and Rome. In modern days Napoleon spread its wings like black shadows over France. It is the emblem of Russian despotism and American freedom. Austria, Prussia, Poland, Sicily, Spain, Sardinia, and many of the small governments of Germany, look up to the eagle on their standards; while, upon the other side of the Atlantic, it waves over the great nations of the United States and Mexico, as well as several of the smaller republics. Why, a general war among the nations of the world would be almost exclusively a war among the eagles! It is not improbable that the lion would insist upon having a claw in the quarrel; although his honesty and nobility of disposition are very much doubted, particularly by the jackal and some other animals. He is, therefore, no better qualified32 to act as the representative of a pacific people than the very worst of the eagles; but he fortunately has a wise keeper, called Public Opinion, who of late has held him under some restraint.
“What a chain of destruction!” exclaimed Lucien. “One creature preying33 upon another.”
“Ay,” added François; “and how curious it should begin with a bird and end with a bird. Look at the two together. Ha! ha!”
As François made this remark, he pointed34 to the little humming-bird and the great eagle—which had been laid side by side upon the grass, and, sure enough, presented in size and appearance a most singular contrast to each other.
“You forget, François,” said Lucien, “there were two other links to the chain, and perhaps many more.”
“What other links?” demanded François.
“The humming-bird, you remember, when attacked, was himself a destroyer. He was killing35 the little blue-winged fly.”
“That is certainly another link, but—”
“Who killed the eagle?”
“Ah, true! Basil, then, was the last link in the chain of destruction.”
“Perhaps the most criminal, too,” said Lucien, “because the least necessary. The other creatures were but following out their instincts to procure36 food, whereas Basil’s only motive was one of wanton destruction.”
“I beg to differ with you, Luce,” said Basil, interrupting his brother, sharply, “it was no such thing. I shot that eagle because he killed the kite, and robbed him of his prey4, instead of using his industry and getting food for himself. That’s why I added a link to your chain.”
“In that sense,” replied Lucien, smiling at his brother—who seemed a little ruffled37 at being thus charged with unnecessary cruelty,—“in that sense you were, perhaps, justifiable38; though it is difficult to understand why the eagle was more guilty than the kite himself. He took only one life, and so did the kite.”
“But,” rejoined Basil, “in addition to taking away the life of his victim, he robbed him. Robbery and murder both. Now the kite was guilty only of the latter.”
“Ha! ha! ha!” laughed Lucien and François together. “There is a distinction with a difference!”
“But, brother Luce,” inquired François, “what did you mean when you said there might be many more links to this chain?”
“Why, who knows but the blue-winged fly was preying upon some other creatures smaller than himself? And these again, upon others still less; who, though invisible to our eyes, possess life and organisation39 as well as we. Who knows to the contrary? And who knows the reason why a mysterious Providence40 has created those beings to be the food of each other? That is a question about which we can arrive at no satisfactory conclusion.”
“Who knows, brother,” said François, “since you are speculating—who knows but there may be an extra link at the other end of the chain? Ho, Basil! what say you? Suppose we fall in with grizzly41 bears.” And François laughed as he put the question.
“And supposing we do,” replied Basil, “you are as likely to form that link as anybody else.”
“Heaven forbid!” exclaimed Lucien. “I hope that in all our travels we shall see neither a grizzly bear nor an Indian.”
“And I hope for nothing of the sort,” rejoined Basil. “I long to have a crack at a grizzly; and as for Indians, I haven’t the least fear of them, so long as I carry this.”
As Basil made this remark, he drew out the little beaded case from his bosom42, held it up a moment, and then returned it to its place again.
“Now, brother,” cried François, “tell as about that pouch43, and how it is to save us from Indians. I am really curious to know.”
“Not now, my boy,” replied Basil, with a patronising air. “Not now. We must prepare our supper, and get to sleep. We have lost half a day drying our rags, so we must make up for it by an early start in the morning. Then for the prairies!”
“Then for the prairies!” echoed François,—“the prairies—the wild horses—the big-horns—and the buffalo!”
点击收听单词发音
1 emblem | |
n.象征,标志;徽章 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 disposition | |
n.性情,性格;意向,倾向;排列,部署 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 tyrant | |
n.暴君,专制的君主,残暴的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 prey | |
n.被掠食者,牺牲者,掠食;v.捕食,掠夺,折磨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 carrion | |
n.腐肉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 motive | |
n.动机,目的;adv.发动的,运动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 motives | |
n.动机,目的( motive的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 scrutiny | |
n.详细检查,仔细观察 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 usurpation | |
n.篡位;霸占 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 waylaying | |
v.拦截,拦路( waylay的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 piracy | |
n.海盗行为,剽窃,著作权侵害 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 draught | |
n.拉,牵引,拖;一网(饮,吸,阵);顿服药量,通风;v.起草,设计 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 civilisation | |
n.文明,文化,开化,教化 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 anarchy | |
n.无政府状态;社会秩序混乱,无秩序 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 deceptive | |
adj.骗人的,造成假象的,靠不住的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 vampire | |
n.吸血鬼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 soothes | |
v.安慰( soothe的第三人称单数 );抚慰;使舒服;减轻痛苦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 alas | |
int.唉(表示悲伤、忧愁、恐惧等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 ignoble | |
adj.不光彩的,卑鄙的;可耻的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 bastard | |
n.坏蛋,混蛋;私生子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 shackle | |
n.桎梏,束缚物;v.加桎梏,加枷锁,束缚 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 abject | |
adj.极可怜的,卑屈的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 guilt | |
n.犯罪;内疚;过失,罪责 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 joyous | |
adj.充满快乐的;令人高兴的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 virtue | |
n.德行,美德;贞操;优点;功效,效力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 peculiar | |
adj.古怪的,异常的;特殊的,特有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 buffalo | |
n.(北美)野牛;(亚洲)水牛 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 elk | |
n.麋鹿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 industrious | |
adj.勤劳的,刻苦的,奋发的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 beaver | |
n.海狸,河狸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 rapacious | |
adj.贪婪的,强夺的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 qualified | |
adj.合格的,有资格的,胜任的,有限制的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 preying | |
v.掠食( prey的现在分词 );掠食;折磨;(人)靠欺诈为生 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 pointed | |
adj.尖的,直截了当的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 killing | |
n.巨额利润;突然赚大钱,发大财 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 procure | |
vt.获得,取得,促成;vi.拉皮条 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 ruffled | |
adj. 有褶饰边的, 起皱的 动词ruffle的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 justifiable | |
adj.有理由的,无可非议的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 organisation | |
n.组织,安排,团体,有机休 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 providence | |
n.深谋远虑,天道,天意;远见;节约;上帝 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 grizzly | |
adj.略为灰色的,呈灰色的;n.灰色大熊 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 bosom | |
n.胸,胸部;胸怀;内心;adj.亲密的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 pouch | |
n.小袋,小包,囊状袋;vt.装...入袋中,用袋运输;vi.用袋送信件 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |