Such were the not very pleasant reflections of the field-cornet, on the evening after returning from their successful hunt.
But still less pleasant were they, two weeks later, at the retrospect3 of many an unsuccessful chase from which they had returned—when, after twelve days spent in “jaging” the elephant, they had added only a single pair of tusks4 to the collection, and these the tusks of a cow-elephant, scarce two feet in length, and of little value!
The reflection was not the less painful, that nearly every day they had fallen in with elephants, and had obtained a shot or two at these animals. That did not mend the matter a bit. On the contrary, it taught the hunter how easily they could run away from him, as they invariably did. It taught him how small his chances were of capturing such game, so long as he could only follow it afoot.
The hunter on foot stands but a poor chance with the elephant. Stalking in upon one is easy enough, and perhaps obtaining a single shot; but when the animal trots5 off through the thick jungle, it is tedious work following him. He may go miles before halting, and even if the hunter should overtake him, it may be only to deliver a second shot, and see the game once more disappear into the bushes—perhaps to be spoored no farther.
Now the mounted hunter has this advantage. His horse can overtake the elephant; and it is a peculiarity6 of this animal, that the moment he finds that his enemy, whatever it be, can do that thing, he disdains8 to run any farther, but at once stands to bay; and the hunter may then deliver as many shots as he pleases.
Herein lies the great advantage of the hunter on horseback. Another advantage is the security the horse affords, enabling his rider to avoid the charges of the angry elephant.
No wonder Von Bloom sighed for a horse. No wonder he felt grieved at the want of this noble companion, that would have aided him so much in the chase.
He grieved all the more, now that he had become acquainted with the district, and had found it so full of elephants. Troops of an hundred had been seen; and these far from being shy, or disposed to make off after a shot or two. Perhaps they had never heard the report of a gun before that of his own long roer pealed9 in their huge ears.
With a horse the field-cornet believed he could have killed many, and obtained much valuable ivory. Without one, his chances of carrying out his design were poor indeed. His hopes were likely to end in disappointment.
He felt this keenly. The bright prospects10 he had so ardently11 indulged in, became clouded over; and fears for the future once more harassed12 him. He would only waste his time in this wilderness14. His children would live without books, without education, without society. Were he to be suddenly called away, what would become of them? His pretty Gertrude would be no better off than a little savage—his sons would become not in sport, as he was wont15 to call them, but in reality a trio of “Bush-boys.”
Once more these thoughts filled the heart of the father with pain. Oh! what would he not have given at that moment for a pair of horses, of any sort whatever?
The field-cornet, while making these reflections, was seated in the great nwana-tree, upon the platform, that had been built on the side towards the lake, and from which a full view could be obtained of the water. From this point a fine view could also be obtained of the country which lay to the eastward16 of the lake. At some distance off it was wooded, but nearer the vley a grassy17 plain lay spread before the eye like a green meadow.
The eyes of the hunter were turned outward on this plain, and just then his glance tell upon a troop of animals crossing the open ground, and advancing towards the vley.
They were large animals—nearly of the shape and size of small horses—and travelling in single file; as they were, the troop at a distance presented something of the appearance of a “cafila,” or caravan18. There were in all about fifty individuals in the line; and they marched along with a steady sober pace, as if under the guidance and direction of some wise leader. How very different from the capricious and eccentric movements of the gnoos!
Individually they bore some resemblance to these last-named animals. In the shape of their bodies and tails, in their general ground colour, and in the “brindled” or tiger-like stripes that could be perceived upon their cheeks, neck, and shoulders. These stripes were exactly of the same form as those upon a zebra; but far less distinct, and not extending to the body or limbs, as is the case with the true zebra. In general colour, and in some other respects, the animals reminded one of the ass13; but their heads, necks, and the upper part of their bodies, were of darker hue19, slightly tinged20 with reddish-brown. In fact, the new-comers had points of resemblance to all four—horse, ass, gnoo, and zebra—and yet they were distinct from any. To the zebra they bore the greatest resemblance—for they were in reality a species of zebra—they were quaggas.
Modern naturalists21 have divided the Equidae, or horse family, into two genera—the horse (equus) and the ass (asinus)—the principal points of distinction being, that animals of the horse kind have long flowing manes, full tails, and warty22 callosities on both hind23 and fore2 limbs; while asses24, on the contrary, have short, meagre, and upright manes, tails slender and furnished only with long hairs at the extremity25, and their hind limbs wanting the callosities. These, however, are found on the fore-legs as upon horses.
Although there are many varieties of the horse genus—scores of them, widely differing from each other—they can all be easily recognised by these characteristic marks, from the “Suffolk Punch,” the great London dray-horse, down to his diminutive26 little cousin the “Shetland Pony27.”
The varieties of the ass are nearly as numerous, though this fact is not generally known.
First, we have the common ass (Asinus vulgaris), the type of the genus; and of this there are many breeds in different countries, some nearly as elegant and as highly prized as horses. Next there is the “onagra,” “koulan,” or “wild-ass” (Asinus onager), supposed to be the origin of the common kind. This is a native of Asia, though it is also found in the north-eastern parts of Africa. There is also the “dziggetai,” or “great wild-ass” (Asinus hemionus), of Central and Southern Asia, and another smaller species the “ghur” (Asinus Hamar) found in Persia. Again, there is the “kiang” (Asinus kiang) met with in Ladakh, and the “yo-totze” (Asinus equulus), an inhabitant of Chinese Tartary.
All these are Asiatic species, found in a wild state, and differing from one another in colour, size, form, and even in habits. Many of them are of elegant form, and swift as the swiftest horses.
In this little book we cannot afford room for a description of each, but must confine our remarks to what is more properly our subject—the wild-asses of Africa. Of these there are six or seven kinds—perhaps more.
First, there is the “wild-ass” (Asinus onager), which, as already stated, extends from Asia into the north-eastern parts of Africa, contiguous to the former continent.
Next there is the “koomrah,” of which very little is known, except that it inhabits the forests of Northern Africa, and is solitary28 in its habits, unlike most of the other species. The koomrah has been described as a “wild horse,” but, most probably, it belongs to the genus asinus.
Now there are four other species of “wild-asses” in Africa—wild horses some call them—and a fifth reported by travellers, but as yet undetermined. These species bear such a resemblance to one another in their form, the peculiar7 markings of their bodies, size, and general habits, that they may be classed together under the title of the zebra family. First, there is the true zebra (Equus zebra), perhaps the most beautiful of all quadrupeds, and of which no description need be given. Second, the “dauw,” or “Burchell’s zebra,” as it is more frequently called (Equus Burchellii). Third, the “Congo dauw” (Equus hippotigris), closely resembling the dauw. Fourth, the “quagga” (Equus quagga); and fifth, the undetermined species known as the “white zebra” (Equus Isabellinus), so-called from its pale yellow, or Isabella colour.
These five species evidently have a close affinity29 with each other—all of them being more or less marked with the peculiar transversal bands or “stripes,” which are the well-known characteristics of the zebra. Even the quagga is so banded upon the head and upper parts of its body.
The zebra proper is “striped” from the tip of the nose to its very hoofs30, and the bands are of a uniform black, while the ground colour is nearly white, or white tinged with a pale yellow. The “dauws,” on the other hand, are not banded upon the legs; the rays are not so dark or well defined, and the ground colour is not so pure or clean-looking. For the rest, all these three species are much alike; and it is more than probable that either “Burchell’s” or the “congo dauw”, was the species to which the name of “zebra” was first applied31; for that which is now called the “true zebra” inhabits those parts of Africa where it was less likely to have been the first observed of that genus. At all events, the “congo dauw” is the “hippotigris,” or tiger-horse, of the Romans; and this we infer from its inhabiting a more northerly part of Africa than the others, all of which belong to the southern half of that continent. The habitat of the zebra is said to extend as far north as Abyssinia; but, perhaps, the “congo dauw,” which certainly inhabits Abyssinia, has been mistaken for the true zebra.
Of the four species in South Africa, the zebra is a mountain animal, and dwells among the cliffs, while the dauw and quagga rove over the plains and wild karoo deserts. In similar situations to these has the “white zebra” been observed—though only by the traveller Le Vaillant—and hence the doubt about its existence as a distinct species.
None of the kinds associate together, though each herds32 with other animals! The quagga keeps company with the gnoo, the “dauw” with the “brindled gnoo,” while the tall ostrich33 stalks in the midst of the herds of both!
There is much difference in the nature and disposition34 of the different species. The mountain zebra is very shy and wild; the dauw is almost untameable; while the quagga is of a timid docile35 nature, and may be trained to harness with as much facility as a horse.
The reason why this has not been done, is simply because the farmers of South Africa have horses in plenty, and do not stand in need of the quagga, either for saddle or harness.
But though Von Bloom the farmer had never thought of “breaking in” a quagga, Von Bloom the hunter now did.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c711/8c7110c6592b18f6ee88b0c1624d2cff50b7bbbb" alt=""
点击
收听单词发音
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9800/d9800aa57a2817132ac898b1fdffe18ba341b3ed" alt="收听单词发音"
1
mere
![]() |
|
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2
fore
![]() |
|
adv.在前面;adj.先前的;在前部的;n.前部 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3
retrospect
![]() |
|
n.回顾,追溯;v.回顾,回想,追溯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4
tusks
![]() |
|
n.(象等动物的)长牙( tusk的名词复数 );獠牙;尖形物;尖头 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5
trots
![]() |
|
小跑,急走( trot的名词复数 ); 匆匆忙忙地走 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6
peculiarity
![]() |
|
n.独特性,特色;特殊的东西;怪癖 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7
peculiar
![]() |
|
adj.古怪的,异常的;特殊的,特有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8
disdains
![]() |
|
鄙视,轻蔑( disdain的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9
pealed
![]() |
|
v.(使)(钟等)鸣响,(雷等)发出隆隆声( peal的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10
prospects
![]() |
|
n.希望,前途(恒为复数) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11
ardently
![]() |
|
adv.热心地,热烈地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12
harassed
![]() |
|
adj. 疲倦的,厌烦的 动词harass的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13
ass
![]() |
|
n.驴;傻瓜,蠢笨的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14
wilderness
![]() |
|
n.杳无人烟的一片陆地、水等,荒漠 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15
wont
![]() |
|
adj.习惯于;v.习惯;n.习惯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16
eastward
![]() |
|
adv.向东;adj.向东的;n.东方,东部 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17
grassy
![]() |
|
adj.盖满草的;长满草的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18
caravan
![]() |
|
n.大蓬车;活动房屋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19
hue
![]() |
|
n.色度;色调;样子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20
tinged
![]() |
|
v.(使)发丁丁声( ting的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21
naturalists
![]() |
|
n.博物学家( naturalist的名词复数 );(文学艺术的)自然主义者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22
warty
![]() |
|
adj.有疣的,似疣的;瘤状 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23
hind
![]() |
|
adj.后面的,后部的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24
asses
![]() |
|
n. 驴,愚蠢的人,臀部 adv. (常用作后置)用于贬损或骂人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25
extremity
![]() |
|
n.末端,尽头;尽力;终极;极度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26
diminutive
![]() |
|
adj.小巧可爱的,小的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27
pony
![]() |
|
adj.小型的;n.小马 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28
solitary
![]() |
|
adj.孤独的,独立的,荒凉的;n.隐士 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29
affinity
![]() |
|
n.亲和力,密切关系 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30
hoofs
![]() |
|
n.(兽的)蹄,马蹄( hoof的名词复数 )v.(兽的)蹄,马蹄( hoof的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31
applied
![]() |
|
adj.应用的;v.应用,适用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32
herds
![]() |
|
兽群( herd的名词复数 ); 牧群; 人群; 群众 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33
ostrich
![]() |
|
n.鸵鸟 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34
disposition
![]() |
|
n.性情,性格;意向,倾向;排列,部署 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35
docile
![]() |
|
adj.驯服的,易控制的,容易教的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |