But what sort of language would we have the world speak, if we were told the miracle of Babel was presently to be reversed?
If I may take a daring image, a mediaeval liberty, I would suppose that in this lonely place the Spirit of Creation spoke5 to us on this matter. “You are wise men,” that Spirit might say — and I, being a suspicious, touchy6, over-earnest man for all my predisposition to plumpness, would instantly scent7 the irony8 (while my companion, I fancy, might even plume9 himself), “and to beget10 your wisdom is chiefly why the world was made. You are so good as to propose an acceleration11 of that tedious multitudinous evolution upon which I am engaged. I gather, a universal tongue would serve you there. While I sit here among these mountains — I have been filing away at them for this last aeon12 or so, just to attract your hotels, you know — will you be so kind ——? A few hints ——?”
Then the Spirit of Creation might transiently smile, a smile that would be like the passing of a cloud. All the mountain wilderness13 about us would be radiantly lit. (You know those swift moments, when warmth and brightness drift by, in lonely and desolate14 places.)
Yet, after all, why should two men be smiled into apathy15 by the Infinite? Here we are, with our knobby little heads, our eyes and hands and feet and stout16 hearts, and if not us or ours, still the endless multitudes about us and in our loins are to come at last to the World State and a greater fellowship and the universal tongue. Let us to the extent of our ability, if not answer that question, at any rate try to think ourselves within sight of the best thing possible. That, after all, is our purpose, to imagine our best and strive for it, and it is a worse folly17 and a worse sin than presumption18, to abandon striving because the best of all our bests looks mean amidst the suns.
Now you as a botanist19 would, I suppose, incline to something as they say, “scientific.” You wince20 under that most offensive epithet21 — and I am able to give you my intelligent sympathy — though “pseudo-scientific” and “quasi-scientific” are worse by far for the skin. You would begin to talk of scientific languages, of Esperanto, La Langue Bleue, New Latin, Volapuk, and Lord Lytton, of the philosophical22 language of Archbishop Whateley, Lady Welby’s work upon Significs and the like. You would tell me of the remarkable23 precisions, the encyclopaedic quality of chemical terminology24, and at the word terminology I should insinuate25 a comment on that eminent26 American biologist, Professor Mark Baldwin, who has carried the language biological to such heights of expressive28 clearness as to be triumphantly29 and invincibly30 unreadable. (Which foreshadows the line of my defence.)
You make your ideal clear, a scientific language you demand, without ambiguity31, as precise as mathematical formulae, and with every term in relations of exact logical consistency32 with every other. It will be a language with all the inflexions of verbs and nouns regular and all its constructions inevitable33, each word clearly distinguishable from every other word in sound as well as spelling.
That, at any rate, is the sort of thing one hears demanded, and if only because the demand rests upon implications that reach far beyond the region of language, it is worth considering here. It implies, indeed, almost everything that we are endeavouring to repudiate34 in this particular work. It implies that the whole intellectual basis of mankind is established, that the rules of logic27, the systems of counting and measurement, the general categories and schemes of resemblance and difference, are established for the human mind for ever — blank Comte-ism, in fact, of the blankest description. But, indeed, the science of logic and the whole framework of philosophical thought men have kept since the days of Plato and Aristotle, has no more essential permanence as a final expression of the human mind, than the Scottish Longer Catechism. Amidst the welter of modern thought, a philosophy long lost to men rises again into being, like some blind and almost formless embryo36, that must presently develop sight, and form, and power, a philosophy in which this assumption is denied. [Footnote: The serious reader may refer at leisure to Sidgwick’s Use of Words in Reasoning (particularly), and to Bosanquet’s Essentials of Logic, Bradley’s Principles of Logic, and Sigwart’s Logik; the lighter37 minded may read and mark the temper of Professor Case in the British Encyclopaedia38, article Logic (Vol. XXX.). I have appended to his book a rude sketch39 of a philosophy upon new lines, originally read by me to the Oxford40 Phil. Soc. in 1903.]
All through this Utopian excursion, I must warn you, you shall feel the thrust and disturbance41 of that insurgent42 movement. In the reiterated43 use of “Unique,” you will, as it were, get the gleam of its integument44; in the insistence45 upon individuality, and the individual difference as the significance of life, you will feel the texture46 of its shaping body. Nothing endures, nothing is precise and certain (except the mind of a pedant), perfection is the mere47 repudiation48 of that ineluctable marginal inexactitude which is the mysterious inmost quality of Being. Being, indeed! — there is no being, but a universal becoming of individualities, and Plato turned his back on truth when he turned towards his museum of specific ideals. Heraclitus, that lost and misinterpreted giant, may perhaps be coming to his own. . . .
There is no abiding49 thing in what we know. We change from weaker to stronger lights, and each more powerful light pierces our hitherto opaque50 foundations and reveals fresh and different opacities51 below. We can never foretell52 which of our seemingly assured fundamentals the next change will not affect. What folly, then, to dream of mapping out our minds in however general terms, of providing for the endless mysteries of the future a terminology and an idiom! We follow the vein53, we mine and accumulate our treasure, but who can tell which way the vein may trend? Language is the nourishment54 of the thought of man, that serves only as it undergoes metabolism55, and becomes thought and lives, and in its very living passes away. You scientific people, with your fancy of a terrible exactitude in language, of indestructible foundations built, as that Wordsworthian doggerel56 on the title-page of Nature says, “for aye,” are marvellously without imagination!
The language of Utopia will no doubt be one and indivisible; all mankind will, in the measure of their individual differences in quality, be brought into the same phase, into a common resonance57 of thought, but the language they will speak will still be a living tongue, an animated58 system of imperfections, which every individual man will infinitesimally modify. Through the universal freedom of exchange and movement, the developing change in its general spirit will be a world-wide change; that is the quality of its universality. I fancy it will be a coalesced59 language, a synthesis of many. Such a language as English is a coalesced language; it is a coalescence60 of Anglo-Saxon and Norman French and Scholar’s Latin, welded into one speech more ample and more powerful and beautiful than either. The Utopian tongue might well present a more spacious61 coalescence, and hold in the frame of such an uninflected or slightly inflected idiom as English already presents, a profuse62 vocabulary into which have been cast a dozen once separate tongues, superposed and then welded together through bilingual and trilingual compromises. [Footnote: Vide an excellent article, La Langue Francaise en l’an 2003, par35 Leon Bollack, in La Revue, 15 Juillet, 1903.] In the past ingenious men have speculated on the inquiry63, “Which language will survive?” The question was badly put. I think now that this wedding and survival of several in a common offspring is a far more probable thing.
点击收听单词发音
1 linguistic | |
adj.语言的,语言学的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 intercourse | |
n.性交;交流,交往,交际 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 sufficiently | |
adv.足够地,充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 inscription | |
n.(尤指石块上的)刻印文字,铭文,碑文 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 touchy | |
adj.易怒的;棘手的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 scent | |
n.气味,香味,香水,线索,嗅觉;v.嗅,发觉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 irony | |
n.反语,冷嘲;具有讽刺意味的事,嘲弄 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 plume | |
n.羽毛;v.整理羽毛,骚首弄姿,用羽毛装饰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 beget | |
v.引起;产生 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 acceleration | |
n.加速,加速度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 aeon | |
n.极长的时间;永久 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 wilderness | |
n.杳无人烟的一片陆地、水等,荒漠 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 desolate | |
adj.荒凉的,荒芜的;孤独的,凄凉的;v.使荒芜,使孤寂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 apathy | |
n.漠不关心,无动于衷;冷淡 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 folly | |
n.愚笨,愚蠢,蠢事,蠢行,傻话 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 presumption | |
n.推测,可能性,冒昧,放肆,[法律]推定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 botanist | |
n.植物学家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 wince | |
n.畏缩,退避,(因痛苦,苦恼等)面部肌肉抽动;v.畏缩,退缩,退避 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 epithet | |
n.(用于褒贬人物等的)表述形容词,修饰语 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 philosophical | |
adj.哲学家的,哲学上的,达观的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 remarkable | |
adj.显著的,异常的,非凡的,值得注意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 terminology | |
n.术语;专有名词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 insinuate | |
vt.含沙射影地说,暗示 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 eminent | |
adj.显赫的,杰出的,有名的,优良的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 logic | |
n.逻辑(学);逻辑性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 expressive | |
adj.表现的,表达…的,富于表情的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 triumphantly | |
ad.得意洋洋地;得胜地;成功地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 invincibly | |
adv.难战胜地,无敌地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 ambiguity | |
n.模棱两可;意义不明确 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 consistency | |
n.一贯性,前后一致,稳定性;(液体的)浓度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 inevitable | |
adj.不可避免的,必然发生的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 repudiate | |
v.拒绝,拒付,拒绝履行 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 par | |
n.标准,票面价值,平均数量;adj.票面的,平常的,标准的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 embryo | |
n.胚胎,萌芽的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 lighter | |
n.打火机,点火器;驳船;v.用驳船运送;light的比较级 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 encyclopaedia | |
n.百科全书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 sketch | |
n.草图;梗概;素描;v.素描;概述 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 Oxford | |
n.牛津(英国城市) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 disturbance | |
n.动乱,骚动;打扰,干扰;(身心)失调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 insurgent | |
adj.叛乱的,起事的;n.叛乱分子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 reiterated | |
反复地说,重申( reiterate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 integument | |
n.皮肤 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 insistence | |
n.坚持;强调;坚决主张 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 texture | |
n.(织物)质地;(材料)构造;结构;肌理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 mere | |
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 repudiation | |
n.拒绝;否认;断绝关系;抛弃 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 abiding | |
adj.永久的,持久的,不变的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 opaque | |
adj.不透光的;不反光的,不传导的;晦涩的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 opacities | |
n.不透明性( opacity的名词复数 );费解;难懂;模糊 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 foretell | |
v.预言,预告,预示 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 vein | |
n.血管,静脉;叶脉,纹理;情绪;vt.使成脉络 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 nourishment | |
n.食物,营养品;营养情况 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 metabolism | |
n.新陈代谢 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 doggerel | |
n.拙劣的诗,打油诗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 resonance | |
n.洪亮;共鸣;共振 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 animated | |
adj.生气勃勃的,活跃的,愉快的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 coalesced | |
v.联合,合并( coalesce的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60 coalescence | |
n.合并,联合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61 spacious | |
adj.广阔的,宽敞的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62 profuse | |
adj.很多的,大量的,极其丰富的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63 inquiry | |
n.打听,询问,调查,查问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |