Mourir pour la patrie est un si digne sort
Qu’on briguerait en foule, une si belle2 mort.
So high his meed who for his country dies,
Men should contend to gain the glorious prize.
He might as well exclaim, “fiddlestick!” Again! is Jerusalem his country? He has probably heard of his ancestors of old; that they had formerly3 inhabited a sterile4 and stony5 country, which is bordered by a horrible desert, of which little country the Turks are at present masters, but derive6 little or nothing from it. Jerusalem is, therefore, not his country. In short, he has no country: there is not a square foot of land on the globe which belongs to him.
The Gueber, more ancient, and a hundred times more respectable than the Jew, a slave of the Turks, the Persians, or the Great Mogul, can he regard as his country the fire-altars which he raises in secret among the mountains? The Banian, the Armenian, who pass their lives in wandering through all the east, in the capacity of money-brokers, can they exclaim, “My dear country, my dear country”— who have no other country than their purses and their account-books?
Among the nations of Europe, all those cutthroats who let out their services to hire, and sell their blood to the first king who will purchase it — have they a country? Not so much so as a bird of prey7, who returns every evening to the hollow of the rock where its mother built its nest! The monks8 — will they venture to say that they have a country? It is in heaven, they say. All in good time; but in this world I know nothing about one.
This expression, “my country,” how sounds it from the mouth of a Greek, who, altogether ignorant of the previous existence of a Miltiades, an Agesilaus, only knows that he is the slave of a janissary, who is the slave of an aga, who is the slave of a pasha, who is the slave of a vizier, who is the slave of an individual whom we call, in Paris, the Grand Turk?
What, then, is country? — Is it not, probably, a good piece of ground, in the midst of which the owner, residing in a well-built and commodious9 house, may say: “This field which I cultivate, this house which I have built, is my own; I live under the protection of laws which no tyrant10 can infringe11. When those who, like me, possess fields and houses assemble for their common interests, I have a voice in such assembly. I am a part of the whole, one of the community, a portion of the sovereignty: behold12 my country!” What cannot be included in this description too often amounts to little beyond studs of horses under the command of a groom13, who employs the whip at his pleasure. People may have a country under a good king, but never under a bad one.
§ II.
A young pastry-cook who had been to college, and who had mustered14 some phrases from Cicero, gave himself airs one day about loving his country. “What dost thou mean by country?” said a neighbor to him. “Is it thy oven? Is it the village where thou wast born, which thou hast never seen, and to which thou wilt16 never return? Is it the street in which thy father and mother reside? Is it the town hall, where thou wilt never become so much as a clerk or an alderman? Is it the church of Notre Dame17, in which thou hast not been able to obtain a place among the boys of the choir18, although a very silly person, who is archbishop and duke, obtains from it an annual income of twenty-four thousand louis d’or?”
The young pastry-cook knew not how to reply; and a person of reflection, who overheard the conversation, was led to infer that a country of moderate extent may contain many millions of men who have no country at all. And thou, voluptuous19 Parisian, who hast never made a longer voyage than to Dieppe, to feed upon fresh sea-fish — who art acquainted only with thy splendid town-house, thy pretty villa15 in the country, thy box at that opera which all the world makes it a point to feel tiresome20 but thyself — who speakest thy own language agreeably enough, because thou art ignorant of every other; thou lovest all this, no doubt, as well as thy brilliant champagne21 from Rheims, and thy rents, payable22 every six months; and loving these, thou dwellest upon thy love for thy country.
Speaking conscientiously23, can a financier cordially love his country? Where was the country of the duke of Guise24, surnamed Balafré— at Nancy, at Paris, at Madrid, or at Rome? What country had your cardinals25 Balue, Duprat, Lorraine, and Mazarin? Where was the country of Attila situated26, or that of a hundred other heroes of the same kind, who, although eternally travelling, make themselves always at home? I should be much obliged to any one who would acquaint me with the country of Abraham.
The first who observed that every land is our country in which we “do well,” was, I believe, Euripides, in his “Ph?do”:
?? πανταχ?? γε πατρ?? Βοσχο?σα γ?.
The first man, however, who left the place of his birth to seek a greater share of welfare in another, said it before him.
§ III.
A country is a composition of many families; and as a family is commonly supported on the principle of self-love, when, by an opposing interest, the same self-love extends to our town, our province, or our nation, it is called love of country. The greater a country becomes, the less we love it; for love is weakened by diffusion27. It is impossible to love a family so numerous that all the members can scarcely be known.
He who is burning with ambition to be edile, tribune, pr?tor, consul28, or dictator, exclaims that he loves his country, while he loves only himself. Every man wishes to possess the power of sleeping quietly at home, and of preventing any other man from possessing the power of sending him to sleep elsewhere. Every one would be certain of his property and his life. Thus, all forming the same wishes, the particular becomes the general interest. The welfare of the republic is spoken of, while all that is signified is love of self.
It is impossible that a state was ever formed on earth, which was not governed in the first instance as a republic: it is the natural march of human nature. On the discovery of America, all the people were found divided into republics; there were but two kingdoms in all that part of the world. Of a thousand nations, but two were found subjugated29.
It was the same in the ancient world; all was republican in Europe before the little kinglings of Etruria and of Rome. There are yet republics in Africa: the Hottentots, towards the south, still live as people are said to have lived in the first ages of the world — free, equal, without masters, without subjects, without money, and almost without wants. The flesh of their sheep feeds them; they are clothed with their skins; huts of wood and clay form their habitations. They are the most dirty of all men, but they feel it not, but live and die more easily than we do. There remain eight republics in Europe without monarchs30 — Venice, Holland, Switzerland, Genoa, Lucca, Ragusa, Geneva, and San Marino. Poland, Sweden, and England may be regarded as republics under a king, but Poland is the only one of them which takes the name.
But which of the two is to be preferred for a country — a monarchy31 or a republic? The question has been agitated32 for four thousand years. Ask the rich, and they will tell you an aristocracy; ask the people, and they will reply a democracy; kings alone prefer royalty33. Why, then, is almost all the earth governed by monarchs? Put that question to the rats who proposed to hang a bell around the cat’s neck. In truth, the genuine reason is, because men are rarely worthy34 of governing themselves.
It is lamentable35, that to be a good patriot36 we must become the enemy of the rest of mankind. That good citizen, the ancient Cato, always gave it as his opinion, that Carthage must be destroyed: “Delenda est Carthago.” To be a good patriot is to wish our own country enriched by commerce, and powerful by arms; but such is the condition of mankind, that to wish the greatness of our own country is often to wish evil to our neighbors. He who could bring himself to wish that his country should always remain as it is, would be a citizen of the universe.
点击收听单词发音
1 queries | |
n.问题( query的名词复数 );疑问;询问;问号v.质疑,对…表示疑问( query的第三人称单数 );询问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 belle | |
n.靓女 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 formerly | |
adv.从前,以前 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 sterile | |
adj.不毛的,不孕的,无菌的,枯燥的,贫瘠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 stony | |
adj.石头的,多石头的,冷酷的,无情的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 derive | |
v.取得;导出;引申;来自;源自;出自 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 prey | |
n.被掠食者,牺牲者,掠食;v.捕食,掠夺,折磨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 monks | |
n.修道士,僧侣( monk的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 commodious | |
adj.宽敞的;使用方便的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 tyrant | |
n.暴君,专制的君主,残暴的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 infringe | |
v.违反,触犯,侵害 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 behold | |
v.看,注视,看到 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 groom | |
vt.给(马、狗等)梳毛,照料,使...整洁 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 mustered | |
v.集合,召集,集结(尤指部队)( muster的过去式和过去分词 );(自他人处)搜集某事物;聚集;激发 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 villa | |
n.别墅,城郊小屋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 wilt | |
v.(使)植物凋谢或枯萎;(指人)疲倦,衰弱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 dame | |
n.女士 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 choir | |
n.唱诗班,唱诗班的席位,合唱团,舞蹈团;v.合唱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 voluptuous | |
adj.肉欲的,骄奢淫逸的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 tiresome | |
adj.令人疲劳的,令人厌倦的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 champagne | |
n.香槟酒;微黄色 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 payable | |
adj.可付的,应付的,有利益的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 conscientiously | |
adv.凭良心地;认真地,负责尽职地;老老实实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 guise | |
n.外表,伪装的姿态 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 cardinals | |
红衣主教( cardinal的名词复数 ); 红衣凤头鸟(见于北美,雄鸟为鲜红色); 基数 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 situated | |
adj.坐落在...的,处于某种境地的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 diffusion | |
n.流布;普及;散漫 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 consul | |
n.领事;执政官 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 subjugated | |
v.征服,降伏( subjugate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 monarchs | |
君主,帝王( monarch的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 monarchy | |
n.君主,最高统治者;君主政体,君主国 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 agitated | |
adj.被鼓动的,不安的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 royalty | |
n.皇家,皇族 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 worthy | |
adj.(of)值得的,配得上的;有价值的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 lamentable | |
adj.令人惋惜的,悔恨的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 patriot | |
n.爱国者,爱国主义者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |