Is fire anything more than an element which lights, warms, and burns us? Is not light always fire, though fire is not always light? And is not Boerhaave in the right?
Is not the purest fire extracted from our combustibles, always gross, and partaking of the bodies consumed, and very different from elementary fire? How is fire distributed throughout nature, of which it is the soul?
Ignis ubique latet, naturam amplectitur omnem,
Cuncta parit, renovat, dividit, unit, alit.
Why did Newton, in speaking of rays of light, always say, “De natura radiorum lucis, utrum corpora sint necne non disputamus”; without examining whether they were bodies or not?
Did he only speak geometrically? In that case, this doubt was useless. It is evident that he doubted of the nature of elementary fire, and doubted with reason.
Is elementary fire a body like others, as earth and water? If it was a body of this kind, would it not gravitate like all other matter? Would it escape from the luminous1 body in the right line? Would it have a uniform progression? And why does light never move out of a right line when it is unimpeded in its rapid course?
May not elementary fire have properties of matter little known to us, and properties of substance entirely2 so? May it not be a medium between matter and substances of another kind? And who can say that there are not a million of these substances? I do not say that there are, but I say it is not proved that there may not be.
It was very difficult to believe about a hundred years ago that bodies acted upon one another, not only without touching3, and without emission4, but at great distances; it is, however, found to be true, and is no longer doubted. At present, it is difficult to believe that the rays of the sun are penetrable5 by each other, but who knows what may happen to prove it?
However that may be, I wish, for the novelty of the thing, that this incomprehensible penetrability6 could be admitted. Light has something so divine that we should endeavor to make it a step to the discovery of substances still more pure.
Come to my aid, Empedocles and Democritus; come and admire the wonders of electricity; see if the sparks which traverse a thousand bodies in the twinkling of an eye are of ordinary matter; judge if elementary fire does not contract the heart, and communicate that warmth which gives life! Judge if this element is not the source of all sensation, and if sensation is not the origin of thought; though ignorant and insolent7 pedants8 have condemned9 the proposition, as one which should be persecuted10.
Tell me, if the Supreme11 Being, who presides over all nature, cannot forever preserve these elementary atoms which he has so rarely endowed? “Igneus est ollis vigor12 et c?lestis origo.”
The celebrated13 Le Cat calls this vivifying fluid “an amphibious being, endowed by its author with a superior refinement14 which links it to immaterial beings, and thereby15 ennobles and elevates it into that medium nature which we recognize, and which is the source of all its properties.”
You are of the opinion of Le Cat? I would be so too if I could; but there are so many fools and villains16 that I dare not. I can only think quietly in my own way at Mount Krapak. Let others think as well as they are allowed to think, whether at Salamanca or Bergamo.
§ II.
What is Understood by Fire Used Figuratively.
Fire, particularly in poetry, often signifies love, and is employed more elegantly in the plural17 than in the singular. Corneille often says “un beau feu” for a virtuous18 and noble love. A man has fire in his conversation; that does not mean that he has brilliant and enlightened ideas, but lively expressions animated19 by action.
Fire in writing does not necessarily imply lightness and beauty, but vivacity20, multiplied figures, and spontaneous ideas. Fire is a merit in speech and writing only when it is well managed. It is said that poets are animated with a divine fire when they are sublime21; genius cannot exist without fire, but fire may be possessed22 without genius.
点击收听单词发音
1 luminous | |
adj.发光的,发亮的;光明的;明白易懂的;有启发的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 touching | |
adj.动人的,使人感伤的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 emission | |
n.发出物,散发物;发出,散发 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 penetrable | |
adj.可穿透的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 penetrability | |
n.穿透能;穿透性;能穿透性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 insolent | |
adj.傲慢的,无理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 pedants | |
n.卖弄学问的人,学究,书呆子( pedant的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 condemned | |
adj. 被责难的, 被宣告有罪的 动词condemn的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 persecuted | |
(尤指宗教或政治信仰的)迫害(~sb. for sth.)( persecute的过去式和过去分词 ); 烦扰,困扰或骚扰某人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 vigor | |
n.活力,精力,元气 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 celebrated | |
adj.有名的,声誉卓著的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 refinement | |
n.文雅;高尚;精美;精制;精炼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 thereby | |
adv.因此,从而 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 villains | |
n.恶棍( villain的名词复数 );罪犯;(小说、戏剧等中的)反面人物;淘气鬼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 plural | |
n.复数;复数形式;adj.复数的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 virtuous | |
adj.有品德的,善良的,贞洁的,有效力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 animated | |
adj.生气勃勃的,活跃的,愉快的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 vivacity | |
n.快活,活泼,精神充沛 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 sublime | |
adj.崇高的,伟大的;极度的,不顾后果的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 possessed | |
adj.疯狂的;拥有的,占有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |