God, wishing to make a very fine God, has engendered one: “Touton epoie theon genaton.”
It is difficult clearly to comprehend the system of Tim?us, which he perhaps derived5 from the Egyptians or Brahmins. I know not whether it was well understood in his time. It is like decayed and rusty6 medals, the motto of which is effaced7: it could be read formerly8; at present, we put what construction we please upon it.
It does not appear that this sublime9 balderdash made much progress until the time of Plato. It was buried in oblivion, and Plato raised it up. He constructed his edifice10 in the air, but on the model of Tim?us. He admits three divine essences: the Father, the Supreme11 Creator, the Parent of other gods, is the first essence. The second is the visible God, the minister of the invisible one, the “Word,” the understanding, the great spirit. The third is the world.
It is true, that Plato sometimes says quite different and even quite contrary things; it is the privilege of the Greek philosophers; and Plato has made use of his right more than any of the ancients or moderns. A Greek wind wafted12 these philosophical13 clouds from Athens to Alexandria, a town prodigiously14 infatuated with two things — money and chimeras15. There were Jews in Alexandria who, having made their fortunes, turned philosophers.
Metaphysics have this advantage, that they require no very troublesome preliminaries. We may know all about them without having learned anything; and a little to those who have at once subtle and very false minds, will go a great way. Philo the Jew was a philosopher of this kind; he was contemporary with Jesus Christ; but he has the misfortune of not knowing Him any more than Josephus the historian. These two considerable men, employed in the chaos16 of affairs of state, were too far distant from the dawning light. This Philo had quite a metaphysical, allegorical, mystical head. It was he who said that God must have formed the world in six days; he formed it, according to Zoroaster, in six times, “because three is the half of six and two is the third of it; and this number is male and female.”
This same man, infatuated with the ideas of Plato, says, in speaking of drunkenness, that God and wisdom married, and that wisdom was delivered of a well-beloved son, which son is the world. He calls the angels the words of God, and the world the word of God — “logon tou Theou.”
As to Flavius Josephus, he was a man of war who had never heard of the logos, and who held to the dogmas of the Pharisees, who were solely17 attached to their traditions. From the Jews of Alexandria, this Platonic18 philosophy proceeded to those of Jerusalem. Soon, all the school of Alexandria, which was the only learned one, was Platonic; and Christians19 who philosophized, no longer spoke of anything but the logos.
We know that it was in disputes of that time the same as in those of the present. To one badly understood passage, was tacked20 another unintelligible21 one to which it had no relation. A second was inferred from them, a third was falsified, and they fabricated whole books which they attributed to authors respected by the multitude. We have seen a hundred examples of it in the article on “Apocrypha.”
Dear reader, for heaven’s sake cast your eyes on this passage of Clement22 the Alexandrian: “When Plato says, that it is difficult to know the Father of the universe, he demonstrates by that, not only that the world has been engendered, but that it has been engendered as the Son of God.”
Do you understand these logomachies, these equivoques? Do you see the least light in this chaos of obscure expressions? Oh, Locke! Locke! come and define these terms. In all these Platonic disputes I believe there was not a single one understood. They distinguished23 two words, the “logos endiathetos” — the word in thought, and the word produced — “logos prophorikos.” They had the eternity24 from one word, and the prolation, the emanation from another word.
The book of “Apostolic Constitutions,” an ancient monument of fraud, but also an ancient depository of these obscure times, expresses itself thus: “The Father, who is anterior25 to all generation, all commencement, having created all by His only Son, has engendered this Son without a medium, by His will and His power.”
Afterwards Origen advanced, that the Holy Spirit was created by the Son, by the word. After that came Eusebius of C?sarea, who taught that the spirit paraclete is neither of Father nor Son. The advocate Lactantius flourished in that time.
“The Son of God,” says he, “is the word, as the other angels are the spirits of God. The word is a spirit uttered by a significant voice, the spirit proceeding26 from the nose, and the word from the mouth. It follows, that there is a difference between the Son of God and the other angels; those being emanated27 like tacit and silent spirits; while the Son, being a spirit proceeding from the mouth, possesses sound and voice to preach to the people.”
It must be confessed, that Lactantius pleaded his cause in a strange manner. It was truly reasoning à la Plato, and very powerful reasoning. It was about this time that, among the very violent disputes on the Trinity, this famous verse was inserted in the First Epistle of St. John: “There are three that bear witness in earth — the word or spirit, the water, and the blood; and these three are one.”
Those who pretend that this verse is truly St. John’s, are much more embarrassed than those who deny it; for they must explain it. St. Augustine says, that the spirit signifies the Father, water the Holy Ghost, and by blood is meant the Word. This explanation is fine, but it still leaves a little confusion.
St Iren?us goes much farther; he says, that Rahab, the prostitute of Jericho, in concealing28 three spies of the people of God, concealed29 the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost; which is strong, but not consistent. On the other hand, the great and learned Origen confounds us in a different way. The following is one of many of his passages: “The Son is as much below the Father as He and the Holy Ghost are above the most noble creatures.”
What can be said after that? How can we help confessing, with grief, that nobody understands it? How can we help confessing, that from the first — from the primitive30 Christians, the Ebionites, those men so mortified31 and so pious32, who always revered33 Jesus though they believed Him to be the son of Joseph — until the great controversy34 of Athanasius, the Platonism of the Trinity was always a subject of quarrels. A supreme judge was absolutely required to decide, and he was at last found in the Council of Nice, which council afterwards produced new factions35 and wars.
点击收听单词发音
1 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 engendered | |
v.产生(某形势或状况),造成,引起( engender的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 intelligible | |
adj.可理解的,明白易懂的,清楚的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 possessed | |
adj.疯狂的;拥有的,占有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 derived | |
vi.起源;由来;衍生;导出v.得到( derive的过去式和过去分词 );(从…中)得到获得;源于;(从…中)提取 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 rusty | |
adj.生锈的;锈色的;荒废了的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 effaced | |
v.擦掉( efface的过去式和过去分词 );抹去;超越;使黯然失色 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 formerly | |
adv.从前,以前 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 sublime | |
adj.崇高的,伟大的;极度的,不顾后果的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 edifice | |
n.宏伟的建筑物(如宫殿,教室) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 wafted | |
v.吹送,飘送,(使)浮动( waft的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 philosophical | |
adj.哲学家的,哲学上的,达观的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 prodigiously | |
adv.异常地,惊人地,巨大地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 chimeras | |
n.(由几种动物的各部分构成的)假想的怪兽( chimera的名词复数 );不可能实现的想法;幻想;妄想 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 chaos | |
n.混乱,无秩序 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 solely | |
adv.仅仅,唯一地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 platonic | |
adj.精神的;柏拉图(哲学)的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 Christians | |
n.基督教徒( Christian的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 tacked | |
用平头钉钉( tack的过去式和过去分词 ); 附加,增补; 帆船抢风行驶,用粗线脚缝 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 unintelligible | |
adj.无法了解的,难解的,莫明其妙的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 clement | |
adj.仁慈的;温和的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 distinguished | |
adj.卓越的,杰出的,著名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 eternity | |
n.不朽,来世;永恒,无穷 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 anterior | |
adj.较早的;在前的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 proceeding | |
n.行动,进行,(pl.)会议录,学报 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 emanated | |
v.从…处传出,传出( emanate的过去式和过去分词 );产生,表现,显示 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 concealing | |
v.隐藏,隐瞒,遮住( conceal的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 concealed | |
a.隐藏的,隐蔽的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 primitive | |
adj.原始的;简单的;n.原(始)人,原始事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 mortified | |
v.使受辱( mortify的过去式和过去分词 );伤害(人的感情);克制;抑制(肉体、情感等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 pious | |
adj.虔诚的;道貌岸然的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 revered | |
v.崇敬,尊崇,敬畏( revere的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 controversy | |
n.争论,辩论,争吵 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 factions | |
组织中的小派别,派系( faction的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |