So, too, the exploits of the Japanese bombers3 in China; the blazing houses, the heaped dead, the smashed women and children, and the rapes4 and murders of the invaders5, were accepted by the world as the last word in frightfulness6 instead of mere7 earnests of worse ahead. When again the Italians clenched8 their conquest of Abyssinia by the surprise use of mustard gas, which they had ‘expressly agreed to abandon, it seemed as though treachery and bad faith had made their crowning triumph. All these events which people with untrammelled imaginations would have realised were mere intimations and sketches9 of things to come, were treated as being the final achievement of destructiveness. Why were people so stupid? The facts are plain enough. There was and there is no visible limit to the size and range of aircraft. They were, they are, certain to go on increasing in power and speed so long as air war remained a possibility. What else can happen? Neither was there any limit apparent to the destructive power of a bomb, which again must increase to world-destroying dimensions. Nor was there any perceptible limit to the amount of misdirection and social disorganisation that could be achieved by sustained lying, by the use of poisons, infections, blockades and terrorism. The human mind was amazingly reluctant to look these glaring inevitabilities in the face.
Tewler Americanus in particular was irritated by a harsh logic10 that overrode11 his dearest belief in his practical isolation12 whenever he chose to withdraw himself, from the affairs of the rest of the world. He had escaped from the old world and he hated to feel that he was being drawn13 back to share a common destiny with the rest of mankind.
By the summer of 1939 the blowing-up of the old civilisation14 was proceeding15 briskly. It was a progressive process. It went from strength to strength. It was a spreading fire in an uncharted wilderness16 of explosives. There was not one forthright17 bang of everything. It was much more like a big series of magazines and oil stores of unknown depth and extent blowing up and blazing one after another, each outbreak starting and incorporating still more violent explosions. The fighting of ‘39 was mild in comparison with ‘40, and ‘40 was mild in comparison with ‘41. Nobody had planned this. There is no sign in Mein Kampf of any realisation on the part of Rudolf Hess and Adolf Hitler that they had fired a limitless mine. They felt they were brilliant cynical18 lads who had taken the world by surprise. As a matter of fact, modern warfare19 took them by surprise. By 1941 they were as helplessly anxious as everybody else to put out the fire again and crawl away with any loot they could lay their hands on.
Goering promised that no allied20 air raids should ever distress21 the German homeland. He probably made that promise in perfect good faith. For a time he had the upper hand and the German public had little to complain of. They made war in the lands of other peoples according to a century-old tradition. War has still to come home to them. Whatever the allies did to Germany, said Goering, he would retaliate22 tenfold. What he did not realise until it was too late was that he had no monopoly in this war weapon he was using and that the Luftwaffe he had launched would not only kick back but grow to overwhelming dimensions.
In ‘40 the Germans nearly won the war with the great tank and the dive-bomber. Then opportunity passed. In ‘41 tanks were pouring out of factories by the thousand, and both Britain and Russia and America were drawing ahead of the German outfit23 in quantity and quality alike.
In 1941 the Nazis24, feeling the nets closing about their adventure, struck hysterically26 at Russia, and for the first time encountered a people who had divested27 themselves of their Morningside encumbrance28, who were united in their dislike to the German Herrenvolk and fought with an undivided mind. They had discovered that in warfare you cannot be too careless. “Safety last!” said the Russians. The Russians, falling back slowly upon their main line of defence, “scorching the earth” before this last convulsive thrust of the Nazi25, were something very different from the crowded fugitives29 in the milder, already outmoded warfare of Holland, Belgium and France. War mounted another step in the scale of destruction, and aeroplanes and tanks by the thousand fought gigantic fleet actions upon land.
The old wars of history ebbed30 as they exhausted31 the scanty32 resources of their period, but this new warfare gathered destructive force as it went on.
In the summer of 1941 it was evidently dawning upon the central group of Nazis that the theory of totalitarian war was unsound, because of this unanticipated and uncontrollable crescendo33. They began to gabble of a new world order. But they had lied so unscrupulously and professed34 lying so unblushingly that now even the British Hessians and the American Lindberghs could hardly pretend to believe them. They had destroyed their own ladder of escape and, as a gang at any rate, they were doomed35. But that does not mean that the crescendo of destruction would come to an end. Their elimination36 would be of little more significance by itself than the sinking of a ship or the destruction of a tank. Even the Germans would hardly miss them. There is no dearth37 of feeble-minded mascots38 in central Europe. The world would still have a vindictive39 post-Hitler Germany recovering its strength for a new Fuehrer and a new convulsion; pluto-Christian40 democracy would still be showing its unclean and irregular teeth at the dreaded41 Bolshevik. World disaste would at the best, take breath, before deeper and higher and wider detonations42 scattered43 the shreds44 of the Christian peace Billions of lies, millions of foul45 murders, persecution46, organised indignity47, none of these things can save a world still dominated by mercenary Christian nationalism from the Avenging48 Fates,
But none of the people who embody49 the Tewler mind in governments and authorities seem able to see a yard ahead of anything they do. They are as capable of starting trouble as monkeys with matches, and as little capable of coping with the result.
“Cosmopolis in thought and life, or extinction,” says Destiny, toying idly with the bones of a Brontosaurus and awaiting the decision of Homo Tewler without haste indeed, but also without any touch of hesitation50. “Time is almost up, Homo Tewler. Which shall it be?”
点击收听单词发音
1 prospect | |
n.前景,前途;景色,视野 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 horrified | |
a.(表现出)恐惧的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 bombers | |
n.轰炸机( bomber的名词复数 );投弹手;安非他明胶囊;大麻叶香烟 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 rapes | |
n.芸苔( rape的名词复数 );强奸罪;强奸案;肆意损坏v.以暴力夺取,强夺( rape的第三人称单数 );强奸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 invaders | |
入侵者,侵略者,侵入物( invader的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 frightfulness | |
可怕; 丑恶; 讨厌; 恐怖政策 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 mere | |
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 clenched | |
v.紧握,抓紧,咬紧( clench的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 sketches | |
n.草图( sketch的名词复数 );素描;速写;梗概 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 logic | |
n.逻辑(学);逻辑性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 overrode | |
越控( override的过去式 ); (以权力)否决; 优先于; 比…更重要 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 isolation | |
n.隔离,孤立,分解,分离 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 drawn | |
v.拖,拉,拔出;adj.憔悴的,紧张的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 civilisation | |
n.文明,文化,开化,教化 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 proceeding | |
n.行动,进行,(pl.)会议录,学报 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 wilderness | |
n.杳无人烟的一片陆地、水等,荒漠 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 forthright | |
adj.直率的,直截了当的 [同]frank | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 cynical | |
adj.(对人性或动机)怀疑的,不信世道向善的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 warfare | |
n.战争(状态);斗争;冲突 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 allied | |
adj.协约国的;同盟国的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 distress | |
n.苦恼,痛苦,不舒适;不幸;vt.使悲痛 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 retaliate | |
v.报复,反击 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 outfit | |
n.(为特殊用途的)全套装备,全套服装 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 Nazis | |
n.(德国的)纳粹党员( Nazi的名词复数 );纳粹主义 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 Nazi | |
n.纳粹分子,adj.纳粹党的,纳粹的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 hysterically | |
ad. 歇斯底里地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 divested | |
v.剥夺( divest的过去式和过去分词 );脱去(衣服);2。从…取去…;1。(给某人)脱衣服 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 encumbrance | |
n.妨碍物,累赘 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 fugitives | |
n.亡命者,逃命者( fugitive的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 ebbed | |
(指潮水)退( ebb的过去式和过去分词 ); 落; 减少; 衰落 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 exhausted | |
adj.极其疲惫的,精疲力尽的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 scanty | |
adj.缺乏的,仅有的,节省的,狭小的,不够的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 crescendo | |
n.(音乐)渐强,高潮 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 professed | |
公开声称的,伪称的,已立誓信教的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 doomed | |
命定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 elimination | |
n.排除,消除,消灭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 dearth | |
n.缺乏,粮食不足,饥谨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 mascots | |
n.吉祥物( mascot的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 vindictive | |
adj.有报仇心的,怀恨的,惩罚的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 Christian | |
adj.基督教徒的;n.基督教徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 dreaded | |
adj.令人畏惧的;害怕的v.害怕,恐惧,担心( dread的过去式和过去分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 detonations | |
n.爆炸 (声)( detonation的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 scattered | |
adj.分散的,稀疏的;散步的;疏疏落落的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 shreds | |
v.撕碎,切碎( shred的第三人称单数 );用撕毁机撕毁(文件) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 foul | |
adj.污秽的;邪恶的;v.弄脏;妨害;犯规;n.犯规 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 persecution | |
n. 迫害,烦扰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 indignity | |
n.侮辱,伤害尊严,轻蔑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 avenging | |
adj.报仇的,复仇的v.为…复仇,报…之仇( avenge的现在分词 );为…报复 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 embody | |
vt.具体表达,使具体化;包含,收录 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 hesitation | |
n.犹豫,踌躇 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |